Wednesday 11 February 2009

Beard or Bust!


If you are really Master of your Fate, it shouldn't make any difference to you whether Cleopatra or the Bearded Lady is your mate.
- Ogden Nash

I never had long hair before I got busted. I never had a beard before I got busted.
- Charles Manson

If the beard were all, goats could preach.
- Danish proverb

You can't grow a beard if you shave.
- Bob Blue

NO! Not the beard!
- Lord of The Rings

In Hollywood, you can keep a mistress, or a boyfriend, maybe both. You can go gay, bi, or pan-sexual. Just don't tell anybody, and don't get caught.
- Rock Hudson

1,340 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   801 – 1000 of 1340   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

OMG and WFT2ers do not comment on Babble or DC. Those forums don't allow Jake is gay discussions. They would just get deleted. Babblers and the JIS crowd on the other hand are free to comment there and so they don't let up. Endless, tedius jake is straight propoganda. Fortunately thats what scroll is for. Like they really think they can change my mind about Jake being gay just because they say so.

Jakes fandom really is down. He was at the Fincher thing, then the play but no crowd of fans bothered to show up to see him. Before Reeke he always pulled a crowd.

Anonymous said...

I figured that would be the case, 11:20. Not too many are interested in him anymore. Thanks for that info.

Anonymous said...

"Endless, tedius jake is straight propoganda."

ITA Also straight propogandized Jake is endless and tedius.

Anonymous said...

"Jakes fandom really is down."

That's what happens when you haven't been in a movie since Oct. 2007, when your next three films are postponed, and when you've spent more time over the past 16 months arranging a fauxmance consisting of staged photo-ops and planted false rumors than acting (stage or screen), writing, producing, directing or doing any meaningful political work.

"He was at the Fincher thing, then the play but no crowd of fans bothered to show up to see him."

The odd thing about Fincher's festschrift was not who showed up, but who didn't show up. Fincher has worked with major stars like Brad Pitt, Gweneth Paltrow, Morgan Freeman, Robert Downey, Jr., Mark Ruffalo and Cate Blanchett. Where were they? Why was Jake the only established, famous star on the roster?

"WFT1, OMG are the only Jake blogs that are now attracting posters that are sharp & smart"

Hear, hear.

"what about Beverly Hills Beard and the Last Goatee. or Die Straighter. or The Control Identity. or Midget:Imposterer JIS."

See what I mean? LOL!

Anonymous said...

"Babblers and the JIS crowd on the other hand are free to comment there and so they don't let up."

Yeah all 4 of them. LOL

Anonymous said...

Jones: Way ahead of you, sir, only the dogcatcher said he didn’t want to be associated with this project, said it was demeaning. We’ll have to settle for an NBC television writer.

Ay, that is harsh!

Anonymous said...

What if PoP is a commercial flop?
I think Jake should have tried to deliver quality work instead of looking for a franchise.


Flop or not, I think it's very important to use this time before PoP to get new, good and high profile project. I would really hate to see Jake becoming another Brendan Fraser.

Anonymous said...

Jake thinkin *my god even after I packed all this crap in the car to cover up the cum stains me and Austin left last night she's still asking me 'what's that smell' What is she, a freakin bloodhound?*

LMAO!

Anonymous said...

IUC Exclusive: Which Hollywood actor recently got a lead role by letting a director in where the sun don’t shine?

*pictures of 15 actors, actresses and Jake*

IUC

Anonymous said...

^^ Its Big Bird.

Anonymous said...

That cheap whore!

Anonymous said...

I respect those egg laying chickens a whole lot more now.

Anonymous said...

Afterwards i walked like a duck and couldn't poop for a week.

Anonymous said...

IUC Exclusive: Which Hollywood actor recently got a lead role by letting a director in where the sun don’t shine?

Isn't this an older BI? I remember reading it before.

Anonymous said...

Amateurs.

Anonymous said...

Isn't this an older BI?

Toothy bigwig BI or ...?

Anonymous said...

Toothy bigwig BI or ...?

No, it wasn't Toothy related, just a BI from PageSix or Ent lawyer. I remember reading something similar a while ago but I don't know where.

Anonymous said...

If this is not a showmance, if Jake wants a family of his own, why not look for a nice single lady and have his own children? Why put up with Witherspoon and her and douchbag Phillippe's spawn?

Anonymous said...

Which Hollywood actor recently got a lead role

Isn't this an older BI?


"recently got"

Anonymous said...

I would really hate to see Jake becoming another Brendan Fraser.

That's exactly what's gonna happen if he stays in Witherspoon's company and chooses movies like PoP. I hope he'll wisen up soon.

Anonymous said...

5.40 am, ITA and someone younger, not a actress, someone who will devote 100% time to the kids and his career.

Anonymous said...

PoP 2 = Legally Blonde 2

Anonymous said...

PoP 3 = Four Christmases 2

Anonymous said...

Four Christmases 2 = mass suicides

Anonymous said...

^^IA. I think the arranged photo ops are mostly her idea, also the one's in the most inappropriate times. Jake went along, because he's a bit of a wimp I think. It's frustrating.

Anonymous said...

I already got nice, *tight* and tall, but he's no lady!

Anonymous said...

Let's hope he's a gentleman :)

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
I would really hate to see Jake becoming another Brendan Fraser.

That's exactly what's gonna happen if he stays in Witherspoon's company and chooses movies like PoP. I hope he'll wisen up soon.



ITA

Anonymous said...

The odd thing about Fincher's festschrift was not who showed up, but who didn't show up. Fincher has worked with major stars like Brad Pitt, Gweneth Paltrow, Morgan Freeman, Robert Downey, Jr., Mark Ruffalo and Cate Blanchett. Where were they?

Yes, that was strange.

Anonymous said...

S. Darko: A Donnie Darko Tale: Poster, News, and Trailer

The biggest story of the day seems to be the announcement of a "Donnie Darko," sequel known as "S. Darko." However, studios seem to be taking the picture lightly with Chris Fisher helming the project and actors Jake Gyllenhaal with Maggie Gyllenhaal suspiciously absent. Instead prepare for Ed Westwick and Elizabeth Berkley to headline...

S. Darko takes place in the summer of 1995, seven years after the original film. It follows Donnie Darko's younger sister, Samantha (Daveigh Chase), who, in the wake of his death, has found herself at age 17 with a broken family, mired in feelings of insignificance. She and her best friend Corey (Evigan) set off on a road trip to Hollywood in a bid to 'make it big', but their journey is cut short when their car breaks down unexpectedly, leaving them stranded in a small desert town. When a meteorite happens to crash-land nearby, Samantha is plagued by bizarre visions telling of the universe's end and it appears that their breakdown was part of some grander plan. When she finds out she was actually adopted by the Darkos, and that she is in no way related to Donnie, she must face her own demons and, in doing so, save the world and herself(Internet).

This breaking story from Bloody-disgusting.com states that "S. Darko," will be heading straight to DVD/Blu-ray formats and thus, the film will probably be exploring B-movie territory...

In addition to the first still we posted last week, beyond the break you can check out the teaser trailer for Fox Home Entertainment's S.Darko: A Donnie Darko Tale, which arrives April 28th day-and-date on Blu-ray and DVD. High Def Digest reports that text specs will see a BD-50 dual-layer presentation with 1080p/AVC MPEG-4 video and DTS-HD Lossless Master Audio 5.1 Surround audio. No extras have been released yet (Bloody-Disgusting).

Directed by Chris Fisher, the story picks up seven years after the first film (and Donnie's death) when little sister Samantha Darko and her best friend Corey are now 18 and on a roadtrip to Los Angeles when they are plagued by bizarre visions (Bloody-Disgusting).

Release Date: 2009.

The first trailer available for "S. Darko," here:

S. Darko trailer

Anonymous said...

IUC Exclusive: Which Hollywood actor recently got a lead role by letting a director in where the sun don’t shine?

mookie said on February 17th, 2009 at 7:50 am

Zac, duh. Jakey-poo, Joaquin, and Brandon Routh are experienced in the casting couch world. Downey, Rourke, and Costner are vets.

Anonymous said...

7:19: Fincher is not well liked in HW, he should be grateful B. Button got these nominations after being dissed last year for Zodiac. He hasn't won anything so far and he won't next week either.

Despite the dislike he is the "it" director of the moment so no wonder Jake showed up. Brad I assume likes him since he did 3 movies with him but I'm sure Brad had more important things to do that night.

Anonymous said...

So, what do you think:

a) Jake is one of the rare Hollywood actors who likes Fincher
b) Jake is one of the rare Hollywood actors who needs to kiss up to Fincher
c) both?

Anonymous said...

Jake should not go to Egypt. He should not visit The Sphinx. He should stop fucking around with the Oedipus myth, he almost put out his eye, already.

It's OK to love your mommy, man!

Anonymous said...

Not to mention the curse of the mummy!

Anonymous said...

5:40's comment is a perfect example of the sexism that reeks on this board.

So, the only appropriate possible woman for Jake would be a broodmare and housewife.

Whether you like Reese or not, why would being a woman of ambition a bad thing?

I am being to think that some of you don't really have a problem with Reese, but a serious problem with the idea of Jake having a "girlfriend" who may be perceived as more famous or powerful that him.

Why would you consider that aspect of it problematic unless you think a man must always be the more powerful figure in a relationship.

I don't particularly care for Reese or this relationship, but I have no problem with her desire to be strong or ambitious.

I am surprised that people who would advocate tolerance and freedom would propagate such traditonal stereotypes of male/female relationships.

Anonymous said...

10:19 might be a babbler posing as a feminist defender

but deep down i agree a little...

Anonymous said...

Maybe that's why Jake looked down in the dumps when he went back to LA. He flew Virgin, not Northwest.

Anonymous said...

I am 10:19. I don't care who Jake fucks. I follow like I follow alot of gossip. But I am surprised at the nature of the comments about Reese. Comments about her looks, weight, height are disturbing because none of these aspects of her have anything to do with the nature of her relationship with Jake. You don't like her personality,fine, take it apart.

But alot of the rest of this stuff is indicative of a sexism coming from people screaming the loudest about discrimination.

You want to be treated a certain way, but you then engage in the very behavior you supposedly despise.

I would think that people who genuinely care about discrimination, are very careful not to practice it themselves.

I am sure that the people who are most guilty, rather than engaging my observations, will attempt to deflect by calling me a troll, a babbler or some other name.

Great movements for social justice are not served by inappropriate name calling, trash talking and hyporcrisy.

Anonymous said...

Jake is bi = Reeke is real

Jake loves Reese for more than her looks

Criticize Reese's looks = sexism
sexism = discrimination of all minorities

Criticize Reese's personality (and if you do, the comeback: "How can you criticize Reese's personality when you don't even know her?")

Gossip blog opinions = social injustice

Omg the world is falling apart!

Anonymous said...

As a successful, well paid woman, considered powerful in my own little sphere of influence, I can say that I can't stand Reese. Could not stand her before Jake, can't stand her even more with Jake. Has nothing to do with feminism. She is arrogant, haughty and the biggest phony that ever walked.

Anonymous said...

*looks for sexist comments*

*sees nothing*

except for the new Babbler tactic:
dislike/attack Reese = sexist

Anonymous said...

Whether you like Reese or not, why would being a woman of ambition a bad thing?

Ambition isn't a bad thing.
Reese being a smug and nasty bitch is a bad thing.

Anonymous said...

But alot of the rest of this stuff is indicative of a sexism coming from people screaming the loudest about discrimination.

Bitching, not sexism.

Anonymous said...

Surprpised that sexist comments are left here and tolerated since "Jackie" started deleting all those racist and anti-semetic posts from those log cabin freepers from the DC forum.

The racist comments were against Obama and the anti-semetic comments were against his mother and Jake.

Anonymous said...

Oy Jaysus save me the Big Mommies are back with their lectures and babbler bullshit

Anonymous said...

Posted on OMG by Proud Parents Photoshop :)

Jake and Austin with baby

Anonymous said...

Jake: Honey after this game is over lets go home and make another one of these

Baby: Eww

Anonymous said...

Criticize Reese's looks = sexism
sexism = discrimination of all minorities
Gossip blog opinions = social injustice


Babblers never bother with minor details, like facts or rational thinking, when they post here.

Anonymous said...

{You want to be treated a certain way, but you then engage in the very behavior you supposedly despise.
I would think that people who genuinely care about discrimination, are very careful not to practice it themselves.}

What??? Where have you been? The boys and some girls here have practiced this for some time now. It's all they know! All in the name of (intorelance) of gays and gay issues because Jake is hurting the cause of (gay right) for not coming out when he is rumored to be gay. Well, whata you know, someone is thinking.

(You want to be treated a certain way, but you then engage in the very behavior you supposedly despise.)

hummmm, Just think, if the gays here were straight, they would diffinately be bigots and hate gays. That's my assessment! All the NON LOVE they pass out here is telling of intolerance of a (live and let live) attitude.

{I would think that people who genuinely care about discrimination, are very careful not to practice it themselves.}

Well, Think again. NOT Happening HERE!

(I am sure that the people who are most guilty, rather than engaging my observations, will attempt to deflect by calling me a troll, a babbler or some other name.)

They have no other logical course or action. It's plan B, C, D etc.
Besides name calling it's seems to be exciting to the intolerant, now descriminating gays here.

(Great movements for social justice are not served by inappropriate name calling, trash talking and hyporcrisy.

For the life of me I don't understand why you posted this. It's a lost cause. It will go right over their heads....

Descriminating and intolerant Gays.
That's a new one for me, but after reading some of the posters, which are gay, post for some time now, I'm convinced it exist!

Anonymous said...

10:41, give up. Most of these people apparantly didn't read what you actually wrote the first or second time. You said that you didn't have a problem with attacking Reese's personality or persona, but somehow most managed to ignore that. They ascribe things to you that are not present in your text, and then use these constructions to attack or belittle you.

You cannot expect honest discourse with alot of the people on this board. They just want to rant.

Besides, its a gossip board. You can't expect intellecual honesty or introspection - or even an ablility to read and comprehend.

You just have to accept the silliness that it mostly is.

Anonymous said...

For the life of me I don't understand why you posted this.

The same reason why YOU post on WFT2 nad OMG.

LOL

Anonymous said...

Is this some insane booby posting to itself?

Anonymous said...

Oh, no!

Babblers are dissapointed in us once again!

Anonymous said...

At least wait until we get home this time. I hate it when we're on the road goin somewhere and Daddy1 gets hungry and starts sucking on Daddy2 and then Daddy2 gets to grunting and driving crazy. They don't make carseats strong enough for that shit. And please when we get home use your own room. Don't think I can't hear you when you're moaning and groaning right next to my bassinet. Gah I'm gonna be in therapy before I'm 10.

Anonymous said...

Looks like Jake is going to write a book about being TT. IUC had a new post about it. Maybe Ted C will write a book about Toothy. That would be a smart move to make, have it be about all the closeted actors in HW. I bet it be very sarcastic and funny too. Ian says 2 books are in the works.

Anonymous said...

THE UNRAVELING OF KANYE WEST

"Once off the phone, West takes care to specify that the woman given the task of realizing his hyperspecific horticultural vision is not his interior designer and not his gofer—but rather his apartment manager. "Titles are very important. I like to embody titles, y'know, or words that have negative connotations, and explain why that's good," he says.

"Take the word gay—like, in hip-hop, that's a negative thing, right? But in the past two, three years, all the gay people I've encountered have been, like, really, really, extremely dope. Y'know, I haven't, like, gone to a gay bar, nor do I ever plan to. But where I would talk to a gay person—the conversation would be mostly around, like, art or design—it'd be really dope. From a design standpoint, kids'll say, 'Dude, those pants are gay.' But if it's, like, good, good, good fashion-level, design-level stuff, where it's on a higher level than the average commercial design stuff, it's, like, gay people that do that. I think that should be said as a compliment. Like, 'Dude, that's so good it's almost . . . gay.'"

West's friends and professional adjuncts, who quietly pass in and out of his loft throughout the day, start cracking up, and he leaves his chair for a bit of stand-up: "'Dude, that's so good it's almost gay!' 'Dude, you pay real attention to detail—that's almost, like, gay!' 'You had a whole conversation with that girl without bringing up sex? That was, like, gay!'"

Details, March 2009

Anonymous said...

anon 11:58, I am a different anon poster than poster 10:19. Of course you would think that the only person / people who don't agree with you are one in the same. Believe it if it makes you happy. Just as you believe in babytile.

Anonymous said...

Looks like Jake is going to write a book about being TT. IUC had a new post about it.

I don't see new IUC post about TT. Is it post from the last week?

Anonymous said...

"Believe it if it makes you happy. Just as you believe in babytile."

And you can believe in Reeke if it makes you happy. Just go believe in it over at your Babble, not here.

Anonymous said...

anon 11:58, I am a different anon poster than poster 10:19

You love us, admit it!
You read WFT2 and you post here - we must be doing something right!

Anonymous said...

I hate it when we're on the road goin somewhere and Daddy1 gets hungry and starts sucking on Daddy2 and then Daddy2 gets to grunting and driving crazy.

Oops!

Anonymous said...

It could be, 12:21. I find IUC a bit confusing to get around. So maybe it was from last week. Still, it's the first time I read about the new book deals in the works.

Anonymous said...

"That was the least of our problems. I was always really proud of her success. I'm not a competitive person, and I have no aspirations to be a giant in this industry. I like making movies, but I never had designs on making $25 million a picture." — Ryan Phillippe, denying that he was ever jealous of wife Reese Witherspoon's success. [Contact Music]

Anonymous said...

I'm a sentimental person who's trying very hard to be a tough cynical person. This show has been more than a job for me; I met my wife on a remote, and we have two kids. I got my dog through this show. This has been a huge central part of my life. I'm quite good at denial, so I've been keeping it at bay. There's not time to dwell. (But) when we're doing the last show, it'll hit me. I'll probably cry like a baby."
— Conan O'Brien on leaving Late Night for Tonight. [USA Today]

Anonymous said...

Brillo-wielding babblers used to show up at dinner time. Now they're settling in with their fat butts daytime.

What's up with the change in schedule?

Anonymous said...

Some thought bashing Palin was "sexist" Same crowd crying sexism now at those who do not find Witherspoon worthy of respect?

Anonymous said...

Brillo-wielding babblers used to show up at dinner time. Now they're settling in with their fat butts daytime. What's up with the change in schedule?

The Babbler Baby Bump Club members looked in the mirror and realized they're all pregnant with Jake's baby.

Anonymous said...

Money can't buy respect.

Anonymous said...

By the looks of them, some are due any year now!

Anonymous said...

Reekespect yourself!

Anonymous said...

Me, Myself and I

Anonymous said...

Showdown at the Internet corral: IUC receives death threats for outing The Duke

Seems like IUC touched a redneck nerve when we outed John Wayne last week, quoting an employee of the Valley’s Sportsmen’s Lodge revealing that Wayne used to bring men there for fishing and sex. He also said a chambermaid from the Lodge once caught the Duke getting serviced by a guy in the middle of the afternoon. Within minutes of posting the story, I received a death threat from somebody threatening to “blow up” our site. Another warned that if I ever step foot in Texas, I’ll be “lynched.” I’m taking these threats seriously and have reported them to the proper authorities who are investigating.

Meanwhile, IUC has been contacted by two different people claiming that they worked on Wayne films where the Duke (whose given name, by the way, was Marion) brought guys into his trailer for sex.

If Wayne were alive today, and I ran into him on the street (or in a bathhouse), I suspect I know what his response would be to these
claims: “I haven’t lost my temper in 40 years but Pilgrim, you caused a lot of trouble this morning and somebody oughta belt you in the mouth. But I won’t. I won’t. The hell I won’t!”

IUC

Anonymous said...

12:45,what has Palin to do with 10:19/10:41's comments. But just to address this aside, this may come as a shock to you but the fact that many of the people charging sexism with regard to the coverage of Palin may have been hypocrites, but that does not mean they weren't correct.

An adult knows that you can dislike someone and still acknowledge when they may have beeb treated unfairly.

10:19 gave examples of sexist commentary. But of course, those were ignored.

The observations regarding the sexists remarks on this board transcend politics and personalities. No one has argued that you should respect Reese as a person. NO ONE. You have chosen to infer this because it suits your agenda and sets up a straw man for you to attack.

I don't like Reese, but I don't need to get off on trashing her looks, height, weight, age, or the fact that she has two kids. I think she's a bad match with Jake because I don't think she would inspire him to the kind of film that I think better suits him(whether the relationship is real or not). But I don't think the fact that she is perceived as the dominant person in the relationship is intrinsicly bad. That just feeds into the stereotype of the strong, emasculating female. And if she is the stronger person in the relationship, what exactly is wrong with that?

Of course, I'll be called a babbler or troll because some just can't venture outside of the box in which they squirm.

Anonymous said...

You don't know nothin' about it, Alma.

Anonymous said...

2:14 you'll be called a babbler or a troll because you walk like one and talk like one.

your opinions are not of interest to me, I don't speak for others.

Anonymous said...

I've decided that being called a troll or babbler is actually rather a good thing because (by virtue of the knee jerk reactions by some in this crowd) it must mean that you can think for yourself and not just follow the crowd.

Hmm. Better a free thinking "troll" or "babbler" than a delusional bitter bitch.


Since some seem to need to divide life into black and white, I guess you are either a "Toothy Troll" or a "Bitter Bitch."

Anonymous said...

ok, cut it out.Reese has managed to become a millionare in HW,i give her that, but she is not the Joan of Arc of feminists

Anonymous said...

Reese is probably the last person in the world who'd call herself a feminist, wouldn't want to offend anyone who might not like that word.

And equality in this context means the right to treat Reese the same way we'd treat a man. If Jake was with a man of comparable personality and looks, I'd be saying the same things about him. Same goes for Palin, equality doesn't mean you can't call someone who is stupid and incompetent stupid and incompetent just because she's a woman.

Anonymous said...

You don't know nothin' about it, Alma.

February 17, 2009 2:22 PM


/snicker ...

Anonymous said...

I guess you are either a "Toothy Troll" or a "Bitter Bitch."

^ ^ Bitter Bitch? hummm. Are you just speaking of the boys / men here?

Anonymous said...

We do use "sexist" terms in dissing someone like Palin, such as calling her "nanookie of the north" and insulting Reese's ooozy cooozy vee jay from which bad things crawl forth and wondering how Jake deals with this -

But just as gays and afro-americans can call each other un-PC names, so can we use racist/sexist insults as a kind of humor sometimes.

It's tricky, that's true. I think Jackie has done pretty well in deciding what is over the line offensive.

as opposed to some other hard line blogs I shall not mention by name but you know who I mean . . .

Anonymous said...

I don't know "Jackie" sure tolorated a lot of the racist and anti-semitic filth that was posted here. I guess "Jackie" decided it didn't look god an deleted.

Anonymous said...

Bitter Bitch? hummm. Are you just speaking of the boys / men here?

^ No, Just the young Drag Queens in Training.

Anonymous said...

The observations regarding the sexists remarks on this board transcend politics and personalities.

I don't think so.
Some of us enjoy trashing Reese Witherspoon, that's it.

Anonymous said...

Reese Witherspoon is trashable ;)

mmm...is that a real word?

Anonymous said...

I reserve my right to be politically incorrect and use profanity when I feel like it.
I reserve my right to post good thoughts, hugs, kisses, stupid and smart comments.
I want to have fun on fan & gossip blog.

Anonymous said...

she is in fact a hard piece of southern chitterling eating ignerent greedy trash that pimps her children and unfortunately "pimps dont commit suicide"

and how come she never invites her mother and sex fiend brother to her fancy schmancy ocassions?

haha kiss kiss everybody, have a good evening.

Anonymous said...

Y'know, I haven't, like, gone to a gay bar, nor do I ever plan to.

Come to the Dark Side, Kanye. We have cookies.

Anonymous said...

haha kiss kiss everybody, have a good evening.

^^^ Young DRAG QUEEN in Training!

Anonymous said...

Bend over and show me your dark side.

Anonymous said...

Yes, Sara Palin proved that she can be just as big oil friendly, dismissive of environmental concerns, position of authority abusing, and bloodthirsty animal hunting as any man. Why would anyone support her over a man who's much better qualified, sensitive to women's issues because he was raised by a single mom, such as President Obama, simply because she's female? Equality doesn't mean taking on the worst qualities of men in order to be taken seriously.

Anonymous said...

IMPORTANT NOTE: IUCTV.com tonight’s special guest - The Real Queen of Bloggers, Dawn Olsen

Perez might think he’s the Queen of celebrity gossip. But my choice is Glosslip’s Dawn Olsen, who will be the special guest tonight at 8pm est at www.iuctv.com We’ll discuss Brangelina, Michael Jackson, Toothy Tile, John Wayne etc… and take questions from the chatroom. Be there, we might get blown up!

IUC

Anonymous said...

"Discuss toothy Tile" ?? No, let's discuss Jake Gyllenhaal. Big difference, Ian.

Anonymous said...

Ian needs to put his money where his mouth is.

Anonymous said...

Well, you'll have a chance to talk to Ian or ask him questions (chatroom).

Anonymous said...

Oh gag me. RDJ and Reese in talks to be in this new science fiction film. Double gag). This is from Production Weekly courtesy of twitter:
http://twitter.com/prodweek/statuses/1217710626

Anonymous said...

Ah, now Reeke photo ops with RDJ make more sense.

Anonymous said...

Sounds like it could be an interesting film. I guess she had this in mind when she mentioned wanting to do an action film. Good for her.

Anonymous said...

Too lazy to get the link but Ent Lawyer has a small blurb today on the RDJ/RW action movie. In "Quick Hits". Says he can't see her in it at all and most comments agree.

Anonymous said...

Maybe that's why Jake looked down in the dumps when he went back to LA. He flew Virgin, not Northwest.

No penis on Jake's flight? I too would be disappointed. lol

Anonymous said...

"I guess she had this in mind when she mentioned wanting to do an action film. Good for her."

Are you that fucking naive? The PR stories sent out about her "mentioning" wanting to do an action film were out a few days ago. The PR releases about her "in talks" about doing an action movie came out yesterday/today. Its NOT a coincidence. Its all PR spiel.

Anonymous said...

Reese + action film = str8 2 dvd

Anonymous said...

There is one, and only one thing that interests me about Reese Witherspoon - when will reeking end?

Anonymous said...

"Are you that fucking naive?"

Are you that stupid? My point was that it wasn't coincidence. So thanks for missing my point and reiterating it whilst you missed it. Good job. A+

Anonymous said...

"No penis on Jake's flight? I too would be disappointed. lol"

Tell me about it. When they handed out pretzels instead I thought, cool, I could go for wrapping my tongue around a hard stick and sucking the salt off. But I opened the bag and shit it was those curly bow shaped pretzels, the ones that look like vulva. No way I'm licking that again.

Anonymous said...

5:46 Don't blame others for misinterpreting your intentions if you don't communicate it clearly in the first place.

Anonymous said...

Penis Slip On CNN

Unfortunately, the peen slip didn't come from The Silver Fox's panties. It came from Zain Verjee and she did it twice! Bitch has got peen on the tongue!

Two things: I'm only flying Northwest and Delta from now and will gladly ask for a jumbo bag of penises. I'll tell them Zain from CNN recommended it. I'm also moving to Georgia, the top penis producing state in the country. They should seriously change their state motto to: All the penises your no-no can eat!

Dlisted

Anonymous said...

5:37, I wasn't blaming you for anything, I was just asking if you were that stupid. But given that you apparently are that stupid (and rather thin skinned) I'll make my points even clearer next time, maybe add a little footnote just for you.

Anonymous said...

Communication works for those who work at it.

- John Powell

Anonymous said...

Michael K @ 6:15: Funny write up but the Northwest penis story was already covered here 8 fucking hours ago:

Flight attendent said...
Maybe that's why Jake looked down in the dumps when he went back to LA. He flew Virgin, not Northwest.

February 17, 2009 10:26 AM

Anonymous said...

Michael K reads WFT2 ?!?

Anonymous said...

Irony rarely works in print.

Anonymous said...

RE and RDJr in talks for a sci fi flick? I'm sure that it'll be called 'Untitled Moon Movie, part 2' for the next two years. God, what a joke.

Anonymous said...

Top penis producing state!

Anonymous said...

Michael K @ 6:15: Funny write up but the Northwest penis story was already covered here 8 fucking hours ago

We've noticed, check out 5:37 PM #1.

Anonymous said...

Georgia: A New Promised Land.

Anonymous said...

I think she's a bad match with Jake

He's either blind or stupid to see that. I've mentioned it, I didn't care for them as a couple, was just interested in Jake's career. But after last years trashy behaviour, I can't fucking stand them. I don't wish Jake bad for his career though. He better get rid of that ditz and start doing films he did before Rendition. Pronto!

Anonymous said...

What's to see, she's a business partner. Too bad that business deal isn't really working for Jake.

Anonymous said...

Georgia On My Mind

Midnight Train To Georgia

Sweet Georgia Brown

The Devil Went Down to Georgia

The Night The Lights went out in Georgia

Anonymous said...

LMAO!

Anonymous said...

RDJ was given a $200,000 Bentley from TPTB after Iron Man was a hit. I'm sure he enjoys it but tell you what, RDJ strikes me as a person who would be happy driving a souped-up bright yellow 1967 muscle car. I'm pretty sure that the lure of getting a Bentley or some equally status-y gift from a studio is the reason why Reese wants to be in an action film, and especially one that RDJ is going to be in so it's a half-guaranteed success. It's all about greed, status and envy with her, not art.

Anonymous said...

IUCTV.com tonight’s special guest - The Real Queen of Bloggers, Dawn Olsen

Starts in 27 minutes

ianundercover.com

Anonymous said...

When I'm growed up I gonna be presdent like Jiminy Cawter but first I gonna have a big penis farm just like him so I can grow really big penises and be a famous penis farmer just like him and I can have as many penis sammwiches I want evey day!

Anonymous said...

OMG I love you guys - some of you are so entertaining -

Anonymous said...

"I'm pretty sure that the lure of getting a Bentley or some equally status-y gift from a studio is the reason why Reese wants to be in an action film"

RDJ got a Bentley because he got paid next to nothing for Iron Man and the studio wanted to keep things sweet without actually giving him serious money. And when you get paid millions, you don't do films for the free car they might throw in at the end.

Anonymous said...

Kid Jake, you are adorable. LMAO:)

Anonymous said...

Kids say the darndest things!

Anonymous said...

Avon just called, said they want to run full page print and online ads in our upcoming issue of the pictorial "Hollywood's Highest Paid Actress, Movie Producer and Academy Award Winner for Best Actress and Devoted Mother of Two Reese Witherspoon's Romantic Adventures in Egypt with boyfriend" story!

Anonymous said...

When the English gossips ran a story about the apt. Reeke was renting, everybody passed it off as old news and probably BS. What makes this Egypt trip any more believable. It's probably BS too. I am surprised though that we weren't treated to a Reeke Valentine's. Wonder why. We got pics of Jake's running back to LA on Fri. Did the world's most private, in-love, romantic couple not go out together on Valentine's Day? If the Egypt trip is true, hope Jake looses the Chin in a tomb somewhere.

Anonymous said...

Better to portray reeke spent a private evening together no paps. Just Jake coming back for Valentines. People are on to the photos ops.

Anonymous said...

But after last years trashy behaviour

A question for the fellow posters here. Please answer honestly and refrain from bashing Jake, just answer honestly. Would you have exposed yourself for photo ops just a few days after your supposed "true friend" and father of your Godchild died? Or would you have tried not to expose yourself, at least in the first few weeks? I'm fine with him not paying tribute, but the photo ops irked me. Ted C. said he "understood" it, if you remember. Do you think it's acceptable behaviour, or does it show that Jake is a selfish man, Reese, in my humble opinion, definitely is. What does this tell you about Jake? I'm not posting this for you to bash him, but I want your honest opinion. Even if it wasn't Heath, if it was another friend of his, just generally. Do you agree with Ted that you "understand" it?

Anonymous said...

I just came out of Ian's chat with Dawn Olsen--she's a gossip blogger. Really great one.

Let's just say--omigod!!! I have to digest what they said. Yes, both say Jake is gay--bi but strongly prefers men.

Ian said he was in love with Heath Ledger--Heath broke his heart....Ian also doesn't really think there was much between Jake and Austin....

Anonymous said...

Ian said he heard this from a "good source"--I think someone who had worked on a film with Heath. He even asked Dawn if he heard about Jake having a big crush (or being in love with) on Heath. She said yes.

Anonymous said...

What did Ian and Dawn Olsen have to say about Reeke? Is Jake going to keep riding the showmance train or is he finally going to step off.

Anonymous said...

No, do *not* agree with Ted, at all, in this. I can understand his not making a statement, but the distancing isn't respectful to Heath.

Would I have gone out for photo-ops just days after Heath, or any close friend, passed away? Never. Doesn't mean you can't escape the four walls and take the dog out for a walk, or your supposed gf and her kids, but I wouldn't have made a photo-op out of it. I'm actually quite surprised that Reese did this, more than Jake. What are they trying to prove?

I don't know if it means he's selfish, but it does make me wonder about his maturity.

Anonymous said...

you know, this may or may not have been discussed here already. but, during the day after tomorrow promotion tours on jay leno, trl, etc. jake brings heath ledger's name up quite a bit. i just remember him saying things like, "yeah, i'm doing this film with heath ledger," or "yeah, heath ledger and i this" or "heath ledger and i that." he just seemed truly enamored. i just remember hearing "heath, heath, heath, heath." i remember thinking either they are bonding pretty heavily during the making of bbm or jake has a big ass crush on heath ledger.

Anonymous said...

Would you have exposed yourself for photo ops just a few days after your supposed "true friend" and father of your Godchild died?

I think Jake didn't care where he was and what was he doing - doing something, anything was better than just thinking and feeling the pain.

Anonymous said...

anon 9:07 don't believe you are going there, but it must really bothers you. I for one am not and did not get mad or take issue with Jake (NOT MAKING A STATEMENT).

Now being out and about for photo ops. I'm not gonna say that the photos were arranged. I truly don't know and you don't either. I do respect your view because some photos do seem arranged, but the mags and tabloids and the independant, freelancing paps have to eat. What I am trying to say is I think / feel Jake is bi or straght. Maybe, maybe not screwing Reese, but I think he likes men more.
I did not take the photos personally. Besides I, nor you know what goes on in Jake's mind before he closes his eyes at the end of the day. We think we do, we don't. It did not upset me!!
No bashing and I do respect your calm and mature way of asking the question.

Anonymous said...

what all did they say 9:08? please share =) thanks!

Anonymous said...

I did check out Ian's webcast tonight. Some interesting stuff. He said that Jake has been seen with Austin, but he's not sure that they are a couple. He may clarify that later.

But the most interesting thing that he said was that Jake had been in love with Heath and had his heart broken. He also implied that Jake never got over that, but I'm not sure what that means.

Now I was always sure that Jake had a small crush on Heath, but Ian said it was love. That is a big difference.

Just curious. I've never been in an unrequited love situation. If you are dealing with someone who's head or heart may be messed up due to a situation like this, would it possibly be easier to manipulate this person? Is it possible that you may decide that if you can't get what you want, you will focus on something else (like your career)?

I know that some don't believe this could be possible because of Jake's silence and his behavior after Heath's death, but I wonder if his seemingly inexplicable behavior may be track back to his feelings for Heath.

Is is possible that some of his messed up behavior is due to his messed up feelings?

Anonymous said...

IUCTV.com tonight’s special guest - The Real Queen of Bloggers, Dawn Olsen

Jake / Toothy / Heath gossip starts @13:50

Part 1: Ian-Halperin-2009-02-17.mp3

Anonymous said...

To be fair, maybe there was something that happened between Jake and Heath, a falling out maybe, but to me, when someone passes away, it's time to let the past go. Sometimes Heath did seem uncomfortable, and maybe that hurt Jake in some way. Just a feeling. But still, when someone passes away, it's time to make peace and let things go.

Anonymous said...

thanks so much!

Anonymous said...

For example, whenever I look at Jake's wonderful BAFTA win, and how happy he was, it looks like he wanted to hug Heath, and it also looks like Heath was hesitant or something. What would be wrong about that? I feel a twinge when I see it, maybe it's nothing but my own interpretation. I'm sure Jake wanted to share the joy of winning, and maybe that hurt a little. Maybe I dont' know what I'm talking about either. :)

Anonymous said...

Is is possible that some of his messed up behavior is due to his messed up feelings?

Yes, it's absolutely possible, and very likely.

Anonymous said...

interesting you mention that, 9:29. not to read too much into anything, but i have watched the "bbm cast on oprah" special more times than i'm willing to admit, and one part always gives me pause. it's when jake volunteers to explain how michelle and heath fell in love. jake seems a little bittersweet. i always felt like he was a little, "yeah, they had this great romance and i was left in the dust." i know. maybe i'm reading too much into it. but i always got that impression.

Anonymous said...

^^Heath seemed very happy for Jake's BAFTA win. Maybe he gave him a big hug in private. ;)

Anonymous said...

I got a little bit of something from that too - like he wasn't part of it.

And to be fair, I have no idea whether paps were arranged or just doin' what they do, when they took pics of Reese and Jake and the kids. I'm glad people realize that even tho we aren't family or never really knew Heath, it was devastating for his fans as well, to have this happen to one so young and talented. A huge shock. It helps to know that he's being honored.

Anonymous said...

It looked like Jake was about to kiss Heath! Looked like Jake almost forgot where he was and was letting his true feelings show. He did not look at Michelle like that at the BAFTA's. When I saw that clip, I was shocked and said "oh no Jake". I could not believe I said that because I felt he just dropped his guard. And it looked as if Heath's guard was deffinately up and his body language seem to keep things in perspective. I had not heard or read about any rumors at that time. For all the gay or bi men here I'll say it was when the you and someone are or were involved secretly and one of you momentarily dropped your guard and becomes effectionate with the person around other people and the other kinda pulls away as to say "not here". And the other kinda says oh you're right with their body language. I just saw the exact type of body language / reaction in a movie call "Shelter".
Now I noticed this scene at the Baftas before I became involved with Toothy / Jake.
Jake almost kissed Heath!

Anonymous said...

also wanted to add that in light of all this new evidence, the lance-matt-jake musketeering of summer 2006 makes me scratch my head even more. that seemed so out of character for jake. i don't buy that they were doing each other. i think that was jake's "let me try this alpha male thing and see how it works" phase. if that's the case, i wouldn't be surprised if he did go through an entire squad of U Texas cheerleaders. Aye. He just seems like one confused individual to me :( Or maybe I'm the confused one...

Anonymous said...

9:38 PM, I think he just wanted to sound nonchalant about it. ;)
It was always so obvious to me that Jake's feeling for Heath were strong. But you know what, I think Heath loved him too, just was better at hiding. I'm not saying they had an affair, but I think there was attraction there big time.

Anonymous said...

jake seems a little bittersweet. i always felt like he was a little, "yeah, they had this great romance and i was left in the dust." i know. maybe i'm reading too much into it. but i always got that impression.

^^ you're not the only one

Anonymous said...

IUCTV.com tonight’s special guest - The Real Queen of Bloggers, Dawn Olsen

Not much about Jake (anything?), but a lot of other gossip!

Part 2: Ian-Halperin-2009-02-17-part-2.mp3

Anonymous said...

9:22, that makes total sense. But I DO think Jake and Austin had a thing. Also, I was ALWAYS conscious of the fact that Austin was a similar type to Heath (at least around BBM). I remember even a few non-hostile DC'ers commenting on that--with one person saying that's was always one of the reasons why she liked Austin because he reminded her of Heath--similar type. (But to me, Austin was more effeminate whereas Heath wasn't--but very similar physicality).

About the rumors that Jake and Heath hooked up the summer before Heath died--first in LA and then a few months later in NY (at the Hudson Hotel), I think there could be some truth here, particularly if Jake was burning a torch for Heath. Heath was breaking up/broken up wiht Michelle at that point and this was the beginning of his decline. He became very fragile and vulnerable--his insomnia worsened...even though I DO think Heath was basically straight (and gay-friendly), I think it's more than possible that Heath might have surrendered himself to Jake's crush just because Heath was in a bad state and desperate for any type of affection/affirmation.

It would explain Jake's odd behavior after Heath's death.

Anonymous said...

9:43, I totally agree. :) And why not, to be honored for such a film, you'd be overjoyed.

Anonymous said...

and Jake added that when he did not have to shoot scences he left the set location for weeks and came back for more shoots later and they (Heath / Michelle) were in love.

Anonymous said...

And to be fair, I have no idea whether paps were arranged or just doin' what they do, when they took pics of Reese and Jake and the kids.

Paps were arranged, no question about it.

Anonymous said...

If Jake was/is in love with Heath, could that also explain why he doesn't spend time with his goddaughter. The girl is a minature of her dad. Maybe it's too much/too soon to look at her and be reminded of the loss.

Remember that photo of Heath that Jake put up on the prison wall on the Brothers set? He may have intended it as an inside joke, a gentle tease about their relationship as a couple in Brokeback Mountain but it could also be a subconscious example of his real feelings as well.

If Jake is not in a relationship with Austin or any other man, could Heath be the real reason why?

Anonymous said...

P.S. I'm sure Jake cared deeply about Heath.

Anonymous said...

glad i'm not the only one. before i knew anything about toothy, i fell in love with bbm. so i watched oprah under the assumption that jake was straight playing gay. i didn't really follow gossip on him. but when i watched that portion of the interview, i felt like something was off. there was a "missed opportunity" vibe to him describing michelle and heath's hook-up. i remember thinking, "well, he was with kirsten dunst. michelle is a willowy blonde like her. maybe he had a crush on michelle." now, i look at it differently.

Anonymous said...

has that moron Ian set off all of this mooning over Jake and Heath?

Jake likes to kid, I thot he was going to kiss Heath, as a joke, and Heath wanted to part of it.

I thot it was inappropriate when Jake reached out into the aisle and kissed Diane O.'s hand as she walked up to accept an Oscar. impulsive, but not cool.

By the time Jake and Reese pix were taken after H's death Jake had been drinking so much kool aid he didnt know what the fuck he was doing. my opinion.

teh three amigos, I suspect Jake felt pretty uncomfortable with those guys. he looked like it.

Anonymous said...

Remember that photo of Heath that Jake put up on the prison wall on the Brothers set? He may have intended it as an inside joke, a gentle tease about their relationship as a couple in Brokeback Mountain but it could also be a subconscious example of his real feelings as well.

I wondered about this too. :)

Anonymous said...

Has that moron Ian set off all of this mooning over Jake and Heath?

lol you guys are the funniest. :)

I don't know how Diana O felt about it, but I thought Jake was gallant kissing her hand. :)

Anonymous said...

why did you find it inappropriate that jake kissed diane's hand? just curious...

Anonymous said...

9:54, Ian's guest Dawn Olsen, a gossip blogger, sounded very creditable about a lot of things. In fact, she was so terrific I'm going to check out her site regularly now! I was very impressed with her.

Anonymous said...

Jake has always hinted at his sexual preference he cant help it, this has been discussed endlessly.

Anonymous said...

To be honest, it never crossed my mind at all about Jake being gay when I saw Brokeback. Many straight actors play gay, and gay play straight. It's called acting, and in the case of BBM, very fine acting. It was only after I started reading about the TT rumors that I began to wonder.

Anonymous said...

{there was a "missed opportunity" vibe to him describing michelle and heath's hook-up}

That's the way I read it also. I was like "What" why did he say that, and why did he say it like that". But then it left me because "he's straight" I thought.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

^yep. and just watch his eyes, 10:03, when Anne goes into her "there were, like, omigod, so many sparks between heath and michelle, like, right away!" Jake looks like he wants to stab her. Maybe he just found her annoying, though. I don't know. lol! I'm sorry. I really have watched that interview too many times.

Anonymous said...

anon 10:01 I loved BBM and saw it more times than I care to talk about. All of my friends will still joke with me about how many times I saw that movie.
I went to see the movie because of the subject matter and because I liked Heath and thought he was handsome as hell. When I saw it, I slowly became more interested in Jake. And I have seen a many of men play gay roles, Dramas and comedys, and they were all convincing or at least most were. But there was something about Jake's performance. Something that I just could not figure out or put my finger on it. Thinking he was gay never entered my mind. But later info was dropping at my feet and I thought did I witness Art immitating Life. Then the Rumors!

Anonymous said...

9:59, I thought it kind of pushy, this was TEH OSCARS, and he was still wet behind the ears, hardly "establshed" despite his famous confidence, due partly to the influence of his family and his upbringing.

He rather intruded upon Helen Mirren's person after she received an Oscar with his congratulations, I thought it was a bit awkward.

Kind of like fiddling with David Fincher's tie, Jake allies himself with power by overstepping sometimes as if he has a right to do this.

He does this kind of stuff. Its called brown-nosing.

(sorry Jake, I love you, man, Im just on your case these days. . . )

Anonymous said...

I'm anon 10:12 and I forgot to say, I have never, not once thought of any man playing a gay role was actually gay. Never! because I know that Are acting.
I do appreciate great acting.

Anonymous said...

I like a bit of an upstart, and someone enthusiastic. :) I kinda hate to see him restrained, as it appears to me he has been lately.

Anonymous said...

This guy Ian is going to have no credibility at all: Heath broke Jake's heart. good lord. what blather.

Anonymous said...

Dawn Olsen never heard of the Grey Goose?

Anonymous said...

I had never seen Jake in anything before, and I knew Heath would be good, but I was totally blown away by Jake. I think the only thing I had seen him in was the Jarhead previews, and I would have seen that, except that it was the busy holidays and I had so wanted to see Brokeback Mountain.

Anonymous said...

Ian had no credibity before this. What happened to the books that were going to be written.

Both Ian and now this assclown Dawn is just repeating recycled crap. And sahme on them for bringing Heah into due to brokies e-mailing Ian. Heath is dead, how convienent, they csn say anything.

Ian must e desperate for hits on his site, what a pig.

Anonymous said...

People must be blind not to see the affecion between Jake and Heath. Hellooo! Maybe it was only Jake who had the crush, but Heath obiously liked him very, very much.

Anonymous said...

If someone's interested in my opinion. Here we go... Once upon a time I posted on WFT that I thought Heath, Jake and Michelle had all romantic feelings for each other. Jake for Heath (more) and Michelle (less), Heath for Michelle and Jake and Michelle for Heath (more) and Jake (less). Back in the day, everyone said I'm nuts. I still think there might be some truth to that.
I think Jake is bi, more into men though. I think Heath was mainly straight, but bi curious and probably experimented a few times. JMO!

Anonymous said...

Ian has not focused on Heath; so he has not used Heath to bring hits to his site. Ian did not bring up Heath. The statement about Heath came in response to a question. But his guest confirmed his statement, so apparently there are some people who have known about this.

Why is the idea of Jake being in love with Heath less credible than any other rumor? Or does the idea that Heath, and not Austin, has been the real love of Jake's life just too much of a blow to the Jake/Austin fairy tale and must be rejected out of hand?

Does it really matter what man, or men, Jake has loved?

I will admit that I have always found Austin to be the poor man's substitute for the real thing - Heath. Heath was always MALE - writ large.

Anonymous said...

I think Jake is bi, more into men though. I think Heath was mainly straight, but bi curious and probably experimented a few times. JMO!

^^ I have always thought this ^^

I don't know anon 10:45, but you may have something there.

Anonymous said...

I will admit that I have always found Austin to be the poor man's substitute for the real thing - Heath. Heath was always MALE - writ large."

I always thought Austin WAS a substitute for Heath. From the moment I first saw pics of Austin with Heath (at the Lakers game) and around that time, I thought there was a DEFINITE similarity but with one difference: Heath was masculine and Austin---didn't exude that.Plus, Austin wasn't an Aussie but I think Jake liked Austin's Western/Texas skills--ie. horseback riding--which Heath also had (as we known) from his days in Perth.

Anonymous said...

Oops I meant to type Austin with Jake!!! (Sorry Heath--wherever you are).

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Jake met Austin in late 2002, long before he met Heath. So I don't get the suggestion that Austin was a later substitute for Heath.

And I see the Heath (a/k/a it has to be Chris) crowd is out tonight and admitting something I've always suspected--that the only reason people don't like Austin is because he is clearly gay and isn't "man" enough. In other words, it's only okay for Jake to be with someone who is seemingly straight and conforms to the traditional, heterosexist view of what a man should be.

And I agree about Ian, he seems like he is just using all this second hand hearsay about gay actors to get himself some hits. Ian hasn't really come up with anything new. Whatever happened to the HW mogul who was going to spill all? And if this guy is openly gay, as he states, why hasn't he revealed his name? And Ian runs with this, but then says he doesn't know and/or needs to confirm the dates? So he believes that mogul when it comes to Jake, but not the dates?

It doesn't sound like he knows anything about Austin, and his talk about Heath sounds like slash.

Anonymous said...

Ian may be a pig, but that doesn't make him more or less credible than any other gossip monger.

What I find interesting is that his comments about Heath were in response to questions. He did not bring up Heath on his own.

I could see Jake falling for Heath. Heath was so multi-talented, multifaceted, strong, virile and beautiful. Jake was obviously smitten. Maybe it was more than a crush.

And now Jake will never see this man ever again. Who knows what kind of regrets he may have. I could see where this could mess his head up.

There was always that gossip about Austin and Heath not liking each other. I wonder if that was true, and if so, I wonder why? Do you think Austin could have been aware of Jake's feelings for Heath?

Anonymous said...

If we all believe that Jake is bi/gay with a strong preference to men, then I think it's VERY believable, hell very possible that Jake had a crush on Heath. Check out how Jake LOOKS at him in pics--and I'm not talking about when they're playing Jack and Ennis on BBM.

Anonymous said...

Do you think Jake saw Matilda when he was in NY? Call me silly and naive but yes, I do. I wonder how he feels seeing this little girl who bears an almost exact resemblance to Heath.

Anonymous said...

Didn't Austin go with Jake to the premiere of "Casanova?" That was the first time I saw them in pics together.

Anonymous said...

Way back, an insider said that Jake and Austin met at the DAT audition, took one look at each other and could not keep their eyes off each other from that moment on. No way that I buy that they were not in love for quite some time, probably even still are. Just look at the way they look at each other. I also think Jake had a major lust for Heath. How could he not. They dont come much sexier than Heath. You can be in lust with one and still deeply in love with another.

Anonymous said...

12:09, I agree with you.

Anonymous said...

The "Casanova" pics were the first I saw of Jake and Austin. Looking back, I find it interesting that Jake and Austin would go to see a movie of Heath playing a world famous lover. I wonder whose idea that was.

By the way,Heath was at the height of his beauty in that film.

I don't think people necessarily dislike Austin. They just don't think he's good enough for Jake. I don't think it has to due with any perceived lack of masculinity on Austin's part.

Heath was a god; Austin is just a guy. Would you settle for less if you didn't have to?

Anonymous said...

I also agree with 12:09. And personally I think gods are great for dreaming about, I don't think you can have a real relationship with someone you view that way.

I think Jake and Austin seem like a good match. I think Austin is very handsome and seems to be down to earth. Seems to me Jake needs someone to balance out hanging around with someone like Reese.

I just finished watching Ian's chat from tonight. Dawn couldn't even say Gyllenhaal right, and Ian said Jake became involved with Austin after Heath died--now that really makes no sense!

Anonymous said...

I don't doubt that Jake loved Austin, but I think his feelings for Heath went deeper than a crush. I think his inability to handle Heath's death speaks to that.

It's possible he loved, has loved Austin but was in love with Heath.

Maybe when he met Austin, Jake thought he found what he was looking for and then, there was Heath - the real deal. But he couldn't have Heath, so he sticks with Austin.

Anonymous said...

Could be, 1:22. But isn't it always the way that we think something new is better? Suppose Jake and Austin were together, good and rough patches here and there. Then Jake goes and makes BBM with Heath. Movie sets are intense and people easily form deep bonds that get rudely broken when the filming is over and then bam, everyone goes onto other projects, to other lives. ITA with everyone about the crush. Its so obvious even in the photo calls. I can see how to Jake, Heath would always be out of reach, with his heterosexuality being more dominant than a gay side, and of course Michelle and the baby in his life. But an "out of reach" relationship always has an idolatry that goes with it, it's always gonna seem better and more perfect than reality. So maybe with Heath Jake thought it could be perfection, but what's true perfection in the long haul is a relationship that we grow from, with someone who is there 110%.

It reminds me of a Valentines Day quote comment Wicked had on OMGodot:

"Longed for him. Got him. Shit."
Margaret Atwood

If Jake and Heath had been together in a long term relationship no doubt Jake and Heath each would have been mumbling that ^^ saying to themselves after a few years. LoL.

Anonymous said...

I would agree with you 1:51, except I don't think the relationship you describe as better is the one he has with Austin either. I don't see where the relationship with Austin has promoted any kind of growth, personally or profesionally.

Heath could have been hell to deal with, but I think Jake would have responded to , if not been inspired by, the constant challenge. Heath had so many interests, so many skills, and was such a superior actor that Jake would have had not choice but to respond if only to keep up.

Not to mention, he had a voice like a god, a face like a Renaissance sculpture and a sexual power that transcended gender.

There is no one in Jake's life that offers that now.

Anonymous said...

I'm so sick of the Heath worshippers.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, I know 3.34. Me too.

And 2.14 one post will suffice!
And since you don't know anything about the real Heath or Austin but make sooo many assumptions, let me make one too and say if Heath was to influence Jake, maybe Jake would have ended dead too!

Don't get me wrong, I love Heath and think he's a better actor than Jake and waaay sexier but don't make silly statements like what Jake's life would haven been with Heath.

«Oldest ‹Older   801 – 1000 of 1340   Newer› Newest»