Sunday 12 September 2010

A Place in the Sun

Montgomery Clift
Montgomery Clift rolling cigarette
during shooting of 'Red River', circa 1948

The Advocate: There are so many biographies of Montgomery Clift and numerous websites devoted to him. What was the biggest surprise you learned about him while researching your book?
Amy Lawrence: I was most impressed by Clift’s canny understanding of his own image. Many biographers depict him as refusing to participate in the Hollywood star system, but that didn’t mean he was ignorant of it. He understood how an actor’s image was built and maintained. In giving interviews or choosing roles, he knew exactly how to shape a performance to achieve the effect he wanted — and to resist the efforts of others to simplify a character. For instance, he was aware that screenwriters and directors often wanted to make the hero perfect; Clift wanted to make the character human, complicated, and not always admirable.

Q: Clift is often spoken of in context as a “gay actor” or in conjunction with Marlon Brando and James Dean. What do you see as Clift’s singular legacy?
A: Brando and Dean both thought of Clift as singular. Brando saw Clift as his only major competition, and Dean saw him as a model, an ideal to emulate. Unlike those performers, Clift’s best work has not become dated. In Red River, From Here to Eternity, A Place in the Sun, I Confess, and half a dozen others, his performances are impeccable. At his best he is never mannered or predictable. His performances are subtle, intelligent, graceful, and deeply empathetic regardless of the character’s flaws.

Q: How did Clift’s being gay — or bisexual, as some suggest — when it was still taboo affect his drinking, drug taking, and ultimate downward spiral?
A: The homophobia of the time, which intensified nationally just as Clift’s career was beginning in the late 1940s and early ’50s, certainly exerted pressure on Clift. A serious relationship with choreographer Jerome Robbins in the ’40s threatened both their careers when Robbins was blackmailed into testifying before the House Un-American Activities Committee hearings regarding communists and other “subversives” in Washington and the entertainment community. I would be hesitant, though, to cast Clift as a “sad young man,” “self-loathing homosexual,” or fit him into any other category into which gay men were sorted from the 1950s to ’70s. Alcoholism affects everyone, and in the postwar period heavy drinking was routine across the board. By the time Clift’s drinking became full-blown alcoholism, it was impossible to disentangle from his devastating car accident, the prescription painkillers he needed at the time, and his professional fear regarding the damage done to his face. In the latter part of his career, his drinking and drug taking were so dominant in his life that he couldn’t function without them. Paradoxically, at the point when he worked with unsupportive or openly hostile homophobic producers and directors, the drugs and drinking sustained him as much as they destroyed him.

Q: You write about the fan magazines of the 1950s that frequently used sexually suggestive headlines such as “Who Is Monty Kidding?” How well known was the truth about Clift’s sexuality during that era?
A: Clift worked in a period when fan magazines were challenged by scandal magazines, each promising “the truth” about stars’ private lives. Ironically, even the scandal rags did not want any “truth” firmly established because that would rob them of the chance to repeatedly tantalize readers with the next promised exposé. Biographical information suggests that people who worked with Clift always “knew” in exact proportion to what they wanted to know. Fans likewise. Everyone minimized the complexity of Clift’s emotional relationships — with men, older women, young women — in order to maintain the image of the actor that appealed to them most.

Q: A recent article in Newsweek suggests audiences can’t accept gay actors as romantic leading men when we know the truth about their real-life sexuality and uses Rock Hudson as an example. How do you think this applies to Clift, who had such intense chemistry on-screen with Elizabeth Taylor and other actresses?
A: When audiences think they know something about an actor’s personal sexuality it becomes available as a touchstone to spectators watching a performance but is never mandatory. People judging a performance often appreciate it most the more it varies from what we think we know about the performer — casting against type, nice people playing psychos, beautiful actresses playing ugly. If we think of Clift as an actor, then his persuasiveness as a romantic lead opposite Taylor, Olivia de Havilland, or Jennifer Jones increases our appreciation of his skill as he seems to become inseparable from the role.

Another issue is history itself. As new generations are introduced to Clift and Hudson, they often react to the performers without knowing any biographical information about them. They are also less invested in “the truth” than those who experienced a change in their perception through revelations and the exposure of secrets. The freer sexuality of Brando or Dean, for instance, has not come to dominate their images.

Q: How do you think Clift would have fared personally and professionally if he began his career today, with the intrusion of the Internet and paparazzi?
A: The intrusion of the media today is offset by the openness of some gay performers — though not romantic leading men just yet. As Tom Cruise’s career shows, it is possible to withstand rumors and media speculation if you have the power and the will to do so. Because Clift was never as closeted as Rock Hudson, I don’t believe he would fight terribly hard to maintain the illusion of offscreen heterosexuality. He might be more likely to take a Keanu Reeves approach, where the actor neither courts nor tries to dispel the fantasies of any fan. In several roles in the severely repressive 1950s he even courted audiences to read his characters — and maybe himself — as gay in the casually flirtatious scenes in Red River, the rejection of heterosexual relationships in I Confess, Suddenly, Last Summer, and Freud, the material on gay Army life that acts as a subtext throughout From Here to Eternity, and the relationship with Frank Sinatra’s character in the film.

Source: Advocate, The Most Beautiful Man in Film

3,267 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   3201 – 3267 of 3267
Anonymous said...

That BV trailer is the worst pile of shit i've seen in a quite a while. After watching that merda i feel there is no hope for cinema, not now not in the future...
Horrible, just horrible! Michelle deserved better,i think

Anonymous said...

Michelle Williams playing Marilyn Monroe is a joke.

Sorry, I'm not feeling this one either. For one, she's too short.
Scarlett J. or the the girl who left Grey's Anatomy who gets on my nerves, what's her name....

Anonymous said...

^^ it would seem either of the two would be better in this role.

Anonymous said...

the scene in a hotel where Ryan Gosling goes down on Michelle Williams and makes her orgasm.

Funny how scenes like this, where the woman is getting oral or there's no penis involved, are rare in movies but blowjob scenes or references to blowjobs are rampant. Oh that's right, 99% of directors are male and Hollywood is run by men.

Anonymous said...

it would seem either of the two would be better in this role

WTF? You think that looking like Marilyn Monroe would make them better actresses????

Anonymous said...

That BV trailer is the worst pile of shit i've seen in a quite a while.

Really? I personally think it's a very well made trailer. Makes me want to watch it.

Anonymous said...

WTF? You think that looking like Marilyn Monroe would make them better actresses????

Just calm down will you. She just don't look the part for one. The second is I have seen these other 2 in more movies and they both seem to be pretty Ok actors. Not great, but OK. And, looking the part is a good thing, a plus, when you are doing a biography film of a Famous star.

Anonymous said...

7:10 PM - being a good actress is much more important thing for doing all movies.

Anonymous said...

Well maybe I'm being partial toward this, Other than BBM, I have seen Michelle in only one other film, and her part was minimal. No, Two. The Mentally disturbed film with Leonardo D. and one with H. Jackman, E. McGregor. That's all. The other two I have a register on their acting abilities. And they seem to fit the part better imo.

Anonymous said...

Acting is not all that matters. Charisma and sex appeal were a FUNDAMENTAL component of Marilyn Monroe's persona. I like Michelle but she just doesn't have either and most times it's cringe-worthy to watch someone try to be sexy. It should be natural. Scarlett Johansson IS sexy and voluptuous.

Anonymous said...

7:26 PM - which part of the word 'acting' you don't understand?

Anonymous said...

Scarlett Johansson IS sexy and voluptuous.

LOL, remember a perfectly terrible Scarlett Johansson in The Black Dahlia?

Anonymous said...

But Marilyn wasn't only sexy, she also had an innocence and was a bit Lolita-like, which, I think, Michelle has/is too. I also think Michelle could play sexy convincingly. Just a feeling.

Anonymous said...

I like Michelle but she just doesn't have either and most times it's cringe-worthy to watch someone try to be sexy. It should be natural. Scarlett Johansson IS sexy and voluptuous

I agree. Scarlette has more than just sex appeal, she has hips, ass, lips and tits plus a pretty face. All the things that Marilyn pushed and (promoted) for lack of a better word. I don't see these assests on Michelle, well, not most of them.

Anonymous said...

Too bad Scarlett Johansson can't act.

Anonymous said...

Well, good thing you folks like Michelle as choice for Marilyn because not many people do.

Anonymous said...

I, for one, didn't say I like her as Marilyn, I said I think she could pull it off. We will see.

Anonymous said...

Doesn't matter what we like or not, nor what others think - Michelle is on her own, she will pull it off or not. Remember how people hated Daniel Craig as 007 or Heath as Joker?

Anonymous said...

As I recall, many of the blogs exploded when Heath was selected to play the Joker. Look how that turned out.

Anonymous said...

What about Jake as Dastan? That didn't turn out well. ;)

Anonymous said...

What about Jake as Dastan? That didn't turn out well. ;)

Critics were too harsh on Jake. He did a decent job, even with the British accent.

Atticus said...

I'm hungry!

Anonymous said...

What about Jake as Dastan? That didn't turn out well.

I know that's a wink, but I think 7:44 and 7:45 (in particular) have a great point. And, obviously, you do too, or you wouldn't have added that playful punctuation.

Anonymous said...

Critics were too harsh on Jake. He did a decent job, even with the British accent.


Jake did a damn good job in POP.

If someone did not like the movie and it's premise that's ok, But Jake was very good in his role. He did not ruin that movie. It was a hokey movie and I think the producer over estimated what teens and movie going fans would watch.

Anonymous said...

James Bond and the Joker are not real people, the physical appearance of the actors who played them weren't that important. For the sake of arguing, the first released picture of the Joker got people very excited.

Anonymous said...

^^wasn't

Anonymous said...

Jackie, I hope I am allowed to post a nude pic of MM? If not please delete my post.

MM (nude)

(MM wasn't that curvy either. Her walk and behaviour made her sexier than her body did (IMO).)

Anonymous said...

James Bond and the Joker are not real people, the physical appearance of the actors who played them weren't that important.

Physical appearance was extremely important for both roles.

Anonymous said...

Actors are about suspending belief. It's about being able to capture the imagination of people. How to embody the essence of a character's spirit. The Joker may not be real to your way of thinking, but to many fanatical Batman fans, he is as real as Marilyn Monroe. Heath's challenge was formidable. Just as formidable as Michelle taking on the challenge of recreating the Cinematic Sex Goddess of all times. Let's give the woman a chance before we decide to dismiss her.

LOL said...

MM (nude)

I hate poses when they look like they're sniffing their underarm.

Anonymous said...

8:03 PM. really, what does Heath's physique have in common with Jack Nicholson who gave a legendary performance before him?

Heath was young, good looking, tall and thin.
Jack was almost twice his age, most people would say unattractive, medium height and a little fat.

Anonymous said...

Joker is a cartoon character, has nothing to do with Jack Nicholson.

Anonymous said...

Heath's Joker looked more similar to the comic book Joker.

Anonymous said...

Playing dumb, 8:27 PM? You said "physical appearance was extremely important for both roles." I took the Joker as an example and proved to you that's not true because Heath and Jack, who were at the opposite ends of the spectrum looks-wise, played the same character flawlessly hence the actors' physical appearance was not that important.

Anonymous said...

Funny how scenes like this, where the woman is getting oral or there's no penis involved, are rare in movies but blowjob scenes or references to blowjobs are rampant. Oh that's right, 99% of directors are male and Hollywood is run by men.

I thought almost this same thing about the love scene in The American. What a fantastic scene. :)

Anonymous said...

I would disagree,for some reason, Heath made the Joker more "real" it seemed.

I wonder who the villain will be in Batman 3. I hope they do the same thing, base it on the comic book character, but bring out a realness. No green tights and sillinesss. :)

Anonymous said...

Wow! Now, I see that whoever is bashing Michelle is just a hater. Because IA with the people who are saying that we should just give her a chance. Talking about Heath and how much he resembles Jack Nicholson, or looks similar to the Joker is truly ridiculous.

Anonymous said...

8:53 PM, nice try. Why don't you read posts?

Anonymous said...

I read posts just fine. You are the one who evidently hates Michelle Williams. You just don't like being called out on it.

Anonymous said...

You said "physical appearance was extremely important for both roles." I took the Joker as an example and proved to you that's not true...

You didn't prove anything, saying that physical appearance wasn't important for the role of Joker is nonsense.

Anonymous said...

Heath didn't look anything like the comic book Joker, or Jack Nicholson, IMO, but I prefer Heath's Joker, and he's the definitive Joker now, for me. Whoever thought he could not only bring the character to evil life like no other, but make him sexy as hell doing it.

Anonymous said...

Heath didn't look anything like the comic book Joker, or Jack Nicholson, IMO, but I prefer Heath's Joker, and he's the definitive Joker now, for me. Whoever thought he could not only bring the character to evil life like no other, but make him sexy as hell doing it.

All variations of Joker are based on the comic book Joker, but Burton created his own world as did Nolan. Nicholson accomodated to Burton's world and Heath to Nolan's. Nicholson was great, but Heath was outstanding. His Joker was evil, cool AND sexy. What an accomplishment.

Anonymous said...

His Joker was evil, cool AND sexy. What an accomplishment.

Yes, I loved Burton's world. But then along came Chris Nolan's world, and I was lost. :)

Anonymous said...

^IA. Even though we've ventured from the original topic.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Someone thinks Michelle is not right for the role so that means they're bashing her?

Yes, because he only "argument" is that Michelle doesn't look like Marilyn Monroe's twin sister.

Jakey G. said...

If only you were so protective of Jake.

"Aww! Jake Nasty loves you 9:10 PM!"

Anonymous said...

If only you were so protective of Jake.

= if only we could ignore reality.

Anonymous said...

Maybe you should think about giving him a break for a change. He doesn't look like the happiest of men. I might be reading too much into it but a backpack at a black tie gala and so many subway rides don't sound like him. I don't think he's okay, I hope I'm wrong.

Anonymous said...

I think Jake has too much time on his hands and needs to find a new job, I maen a new project to work on. Pronto!

twitter said...

SheraLynn123: Standing next to my celeb crush Jake Gyllenhaal at The Ettes. He looks like he needs me to rub sunscreen on him ...
about 4 hours

Austin, Texas

Anonymous said...

Jake is doing a photo shoot in Austin, TX?

Austin said...

Sitting in exit row. When asked if I could assist in the event of an emergency, I answered in Spanish. Never do th http://twitpic.com/2vokl5
12 hours ago

You know you're back in LA when... I love Abogado Juan Dominguez. http://twitpic.com/2vrsy9
6 hours ago

Anonymous said...

Jake is doing a photo shoot in Austin, TX?

No, in NYC, but maybe he flew to Texas directly afterwards? Or some guy at the concert was mistaken as Jake?

Anonymous said...

sarahpotempa SARAH POTEMPA
On my way to a photo shoot with Jake Gyllenhaal!
8 hours ago

http://twitter.com/#!/sarahpotempa
http://sarahpotempa.com/

Anonymous said...

Yeah, it's probably a case of mistaken identity, the Austin TX sighting that is.

Anonymous said...

Austin City Limits Music Festival
Oct. 8-10, 2010
http://www.aclfestival.com

Anonymous said...

Austin City Limits Music Festival - Austin and his beard won't go?

Anonymous said...

Critics were too harsh on Jake.

I don't think Jake took the brunt of the criticism for PoP. Most of the critics, even the ones that didn't like the movie, were more critical of the dialogue and the directing than of Jake. A handful didn't like him in the role, but not that many, and I don't think anyone said he was the main problem with the movie.

Anonymous said...

Maybe you should think about giving him a break for a change.

What exactly do you mean by "giving him a break"?

Anonymous said...

Atticus said...
I'm hungry!


Atti, where's Daddy? Maybe he has some food in his backpack!

Rufus said...

Maybe Jake had a backpack like mine - rich black leather with silver hardware. I got it few years ago and used it about 2 times. hey wait a minute, where is it? it's gone... ??

FB said...

Sarah Gray, NYC

I saw Jake Gyllenhaal at the coffee shop this morning. I smiled at him. He smiled at me. I have a feeling everything is going to be okay.
21 hours ago

Sophia Bush said...

About to take @Aus10Nichols 's nephew to school in Texas. Morning car rides with kids are waaaay #MoreFunThanGossip
4 Oct

Rocking Mellow Johnny's gear on my Sunday morning bike ride in Austin, TX. #MoreFunThanGossip ... http://say.ly/Gey3Iz
3 Oct

Austin said...

GO HORNS!! Gorgeous day in Austin. Just did the Stand Up Paddle board on Lake Austin. Feelin strong.
2 Oct

Anonymous said...

Universal Pulls 'Gay' Movie Trailer

Bowing to growing outrage from the likes of Anderson Cooper, Universal Pictures has decided to pull the trailer for the movie "The Dilemma" -- and replace it with a new one some time today ... Universal tells TMZ.

The trailer in question begins with Vince Vaughn telling a room full of people, "Ladies and gentlemen, electric cars ... are gay." Sources at Universal Pictures told Deadline Hollywood's Nikki Finke they showed the trailer to gay rights groups beforehand, including GLAAD, and didn't get any negative feedback.

But after Anderson complained on "The Ellen DeGeneres Show," we're told the studio folded like a cheap suit.

A rep for Universal Pictures tells TMZ, "The teaser trailer for 'The Dilemma' was not intended to cause anyone discomfort. In light of growing claims that the introduction to the trailer is insensitive, it is being replaced. A full trailer, which has been in the works for some time, will post online later today."

Now if only they can make the movie seem funny.

UPDATE: GLAAD tells TMZ they called on Universal to remove the clip from the trailer last month. A rep tells TMZ, "The use of the word ‘gay’ in this trailer as a slur is unnecessary and does nothing more than send a message of intolerance about our community to viewers."

Anonymous said...

The movie looks like it will be good, but I don't know why she bugs me.


Natalie Portman attends the New York City Ballet Fall Gala.

Natalie was in attendance for the New York City Ballet Fall Gala, where her boyfriend, Benjamin Millepied, had a new piece in the show called "New Millepied".

Ben also offered some new quotes about training Natalie for Black Swan in an article for the Wall Street Journal:

Mr. Millepied said he felt Mr. Aronofsky chose him to work on the film for several reasons. "He wanted somebody who knew ballet super well and who had a modern sensitivity. He needed someone he was comfortable with and somebody not too big that he could still manipulate," he explained. "Darren was the boss. He found a person that would understand being in service of the film. I was very happy to be a part of a full package."

It was also Mr. Millepied's responsibility to transform Ms. Portman into a full-fledged dancer. (Ms. Portman does her own footwork in the film.)

"I've been reading the interviews she's given. The truth is, she danced when she was little, but when I first saw her in class, I thought: How am I going to turn this person into a ballerina in three months? I didn't think it was going to work. It had just been too many years that she hadn't done it, and she really had to be trained from scratch. That takes years."

But even on the second day of working together, Mr. Millepied noticed Ms. Portman "was able to start to make her body do it. She's not going to get the credit she deserves," he said, "but it was amazing what she's done."

The whole article can be read here.

«Oldest ‹Older   3201 – 3267 of 3267   Newer› Newest»