Saturday, 9 October 2010

Love and Obstacles

Cynthia Nixon and family

October 4, 2010

This past weekend, the New Yorker held its annual festival, which -- as always -- includes a multitude of speakers and panels discussing a variety of topics. Top players in all professions were represented, including Stephen King, Malcolm Gladwell, Jake Gyllenhaal and Regina Spektor -- all chatting about themselves and their areas of expertise. Our favorite, though, would have to have been Cynthia Nixon on the panel discussion "Love and Obstacles: The Case for Gay Marriage."

Ms. Nixon, who is most known for her role has Miranda Hobbes in Sex and the City, and now is engaged to education activist Christine Marinoni, stole our hearts with her rather calm, well made argument. Not only does she make a good case, she makes an example of how to make said point.

“Gay people who want to marry have no desire to redefine marriage in any way. When women got the vote, they did not redefine voting. When African-Americans got the right to sit at a lunch counter alongside white people, they did not redefine eating out. They were simply invited to the table. And that is all we want to do. We have no desire to change marriage. We want to be entitled to not only the same privileges, but the same responsibilities as straight people.”

Source: Out Hero: The Cynthia Nixon Edition

3,908 comments:

1 – 200 of 3908   Newer›   Newest»
Jackie said...

@
@ Previous post's comments
@

Anonymous said...

Natalie Portman attends the New York City Ballet Fall Gala.

Natalie was in attendance for the New York City Ballet Fall Gala, where her boyfriend, Benjamin Millepied, had a new piece in the show called "New Millepied".

The movie looks like it will be good, but I don't know why she bugs me.


I like Nat :)

Anonymous said...

And I wish Jake used New York City Ballet Fall Gala for some nice PR.

Anonymous said...

UPDATE: GLAAD tells TMZ they called on Universal to remove the clip from the trailer last month. A rep tells TMZ, "The use of the word ‘gay’ in this trailer as a slur is unnecessary and does nothing more than send a message of intolerance about our community to viewers."

Who will call Fox and ask for a red-tape LAOD trailer? ;)

Anonymous said...

Cynthia Nixon and family are a lovely picture. Thanks, Jackie! :)

Anonymous said...

Sophia Bush said...
About to take @Aus10Nichols 's nephew to school in Texas. Morning car rides with kids are waaaay #MoreFunThanGossip
4 Oct


Awww, how sweet, thanks Austin Father Of The Year Nichols!!

Anonymous said...

Top players in all professions were represented, including Stephen King, Malcolm Gladwell, Jake Gyllenhaal and Regina Spektor -- all chatting about themselves and their areas of expertise. Our favorite, though, would have to have been Cynthia Nixon on the panel discussion "Love and Obstacles: The Case for Gay Marriage."

*cough*

Anonymous said...

The movie looks like it will be good, but I don't know why she bugs me.

I feel the same way.
Despite her B.A. for psychology in Harvard she doesn't seem too bright to me. Saying she understands the discrimination the Afro-American community has to endure, because she read a book about it, is pathetic.
I attended an "insignificant" university in a small European country, but most of my fellow students are much more intelligent than Natalie "Harvard" Portman.
You know, such stupid comments of hers could be ignored, if she didn't come off as such a snob.

That all being said, she was great in "The Professional" and it seems she did a great job in "Black Swan".

DL gossip said...

Someone on eonline said his bf is Vince and gf is a beard:

"Franco, obviously. Old news, but currently interesting I suppose due to the drag spread he just did in Candy mag. Franco's gf is rumored to be cool with being used, agrees possibly in order to further her "acting" career--currently she's filming the movie "The Help" and likely wants to continue to climb the success ladder. All who know Franco well, also know his partner, Vince well. V. I'm told is over the-top-possessive, with jealousy that rivals any girl. He is rumored to have been the man in question on the Canadian film set whom Franco took with him--having supposedly lived with Franco for the last decade. I'm told Franco behaves lately as if he has lost what was left of his mind....not just based on weariness and/or lack of sleep. Keeping secrets while trying to appear completely transparent must be exhausting. There is also the rumor of his having resumed a nasty habit for which he obtained help awhile back--but which he has now given up on trying to avoid. A shame, he's sad."

geez said...

Actor Jamil Khoury will play a gay Arab on the Israeli version of The Office, and the response hasn't always been good: "People say shame on you, how can you do this? Just for acting it. It's not so common. I know there are a lot of Arab gays here but nobody knows about them; they stay closed."

BT said...

Wearing a backpack and going home by subway? Is he OK?

He couldn't get a sitter and riding in cars makes me sick. It's alright, he unzips it a little so I can breathe.

Anonymous said...

LOL :)

Atticus said...

I don't think he's okay, I hope I'm wrong.

If anything happens I get the house.

Atticus said...

*starts taping his name on the bottom of all the valuables*

Jake said...

That bitch!

Anonymous said...

LOL

Anonymous said...

ophia Bush said...
About to take @Aus10Nichols 's nephew to school in Texas. Morning car rides with kids are waaaay #MoreFunThanGossip
4 Oct
Awww, how sweet, thanks Austin Father Of The Year Nichols!!


Ok, is it me, or am I missing something? Morning rides in the car with kids???? Babytile huh?

Jake in NYC, Austin in Austin Tx. with Sophia and Kids. Car ride with Kids and not his child? Surely if Sophia loves Austin she would accept he and Jake's baby.

I've had it. I'm calling the Authorities on them. If you are not gonna raise the child put him up for adoption. OK

Where is Babytile? Why is he not with Austin?

Anonymous said...

I've had it. I'm calling the Authorities on them.

Here you go!

California Child Protective Service Agency - Los Angeles County
1-800-540-4000
(213) 283-1960 Out of State

P.S. Would you please tape the conversation because I'd love to hear it.

Anonymous said...

Well, if I was Jake, I wouldn't let my kid fly across the country for a weekend with Austin and Sophia.

Atticus said...

*starts taping his name on the bottom of all the valuables*

*lifts his leg on all the stuff going to other people*

Jake said...

I've had it. I'm calling the Authorities on them.

Oops!

BT said...

Does this mean I might get to see daylight?

Anonymous said...

Well, if I was Jake, I wouldn't let my kid fly across the country for a weekend with Austin and Sophia.

LOL. Huh? I thought BT was supposed to be the product of the swirled love juices of J&A?

Atticus said...

*mails app on Daddy to Colonial Penn*

Anonymous said...

Jake might be insane (if there is BT), but he isn't stupid - why would he risk losing kid? BTW, Austin couldn't afford BT.

Anonymous said...

the product of the swirled love juices of J&A

Medical technology isn't that advanced.... yet.

Anonymous said...

A child can have only one legal father and I can't imagine Austin being that.

Anonymous said...

the product of the swirled love juices of J&A

A child can have only one biological father!

Anonymous said...

Medical technology isn't that advanced.... yet.
A child can have only one biological father!

LMAO. OMG, I was JOKING!!!!!!!! I can't believe anyone is taking this stuff seriously. Ted is the one who came up with the swirling love juices nonsense - I was poking fun at that. Geez.

Anonymous said...

But swirling love juices isn't nonsense, some couples do that. The question is who's the father in BT's birth certificate.

4:19 said...

A child can have only one biological father

(Although I firmly believe that it will be discovered that a surrogate contributes to the child's genetics. But that's OT and a discussion for another time and place ;)

Anonymous said...

Surrogate is immaterial because she gives away all parental rights.

W magazine said...

Michelle Williams & Ryan Gosling talk about messy sex, bad body art, and the long road to their new film, Blue Valentine.
...
LH:Did you get nervous during those scenes?

MW: When I work I’m not nervous. Work is this fabulous free zone. There’s no judgment. My problems arrive when I’m not working. At a photo shoot, for instance, I feel like a sham. I feel like they’re trying to cover up what’s wrong with me. It’s probably not true, but just my dirty mind at work.

LH: During the acclaim and Oscar nomination for Brokeback Mountain, did you have a difficult time?

MW: I was frozen. You’re supposed to take advantage of a nomination and the offers that come your way, but I said no to everything. I finally said yes to I’m Not There, which was directed by Todd Haynes. I played a character like Edie Sedgwick, the Warhol superstar. She was overt and sexual and confident, and that was different for me. It was a small part, but a big deal for me.
...
LH: You were cast in Dawson’s Creek almost immediately after you arrived in L.A. I’ve always believed that being in a successful TV show affords young actors a financial cushion that allows them to do interesting work.

MW: Absolutely. Dawson’s Creek allowed me to make choices based only on desire. I was so lucky to get Dawson’s. I was auditioning for pilots twice a day. You get used to a rhythm of rejection. But auditioning taught me to change my clothes really fast. To this day I can get in and out of my bra and panties faster than anyone [Laughs].

Dawson’s probably saved my life. I did it for six and a half years, and it gave me financial security. A project like Blue Valentine took years to get off the ground, and I was able to stick with it. I first read the script when I was 21, 22, and it became my reason for being for the longest time. When I ran into Ryan [Gosling], he said, “What about that movie?” I was surprised; I thought Blue Valentine existed only in my head. Until he said that, I was worried it wasn’t quite as good as I had thought. He validated my reaction.

Filming the movie was like being in a kind of bubble. Making Blue Valentine made me feel like I could quit. That’s the story you tell yourself to remind yourself that you have options.
...

Michelle Williams & Ryan Gosling: Heart to Heart

Anonymous said...

Michelle Williams & Ryan Gosling: Heart to Heart

Thanks for that.

Now I'm eagerly awaiting for Jake to finally start L&OD promo. :)

sorry for the rant said...

The question is who's the father in BT's birth certificate.

And who's the mother. Don't get me started on the anonymous donors/confidential surrogates crap! A few countries have outlawed it (the anonymity) and ruled that donor and birth records be open to the child. I wish the US would do the same. The problem is that baby-making is big business for all involved (agencies, donors, surrogates, doctors, hospitals, etc.) but the donor/surrogated children/adults aren't, so their voices are barely represented. Believe it or not there is a LOT of anger from the donor adults regarding not knowing who their sperm/egg donor parent is, and to a lesser degree the surrogate mother, as well as towards the natural parent. Sooner or later, probably within the next 20 years, there will be a major public backlash. Laws will be challenged and hopefully society will re-evaluate and change its views about protecting anonymous donors and putting the child at the bottom of the heap. I guarantee it.

Anonymous said...

Surrogate is immaterial because she gives away all parental rights.

The egg donor also gives away all parental rights. Are they immaterial to the child, too?!

Anonymous said...

She used to admit she was ashamed of Dawson Creek.What a phony. Everything she says sounds meant to be sympathetic and endearing. She has no edge and she is a robotic pleasent.
That being said, I think she is going to rock the world with her portrait of Marilyn. Finally she is taking some fucking risk and acting like everyone else's opinion don't matter,only her's.
This is the first time I'm eager to watch one of her projects and I would bet money that her performance is going to be,if not great, good enough to aplaud her.

I just wish she just STFU,that's all.

Anonymous said...

Yes, they aren't part of child's life. Biology is easy, being a parent is hard.

Anonymous said...

"Believe it or not there is a LOT of anger from the donor adults regarding not knowing who their sperm/egg donor parent is, and to a lesser degree the surrogate mother, as well as towards the natural parent. Sooner or later, probably within the next 20 years, there will be a major public backlash."

You are saying it perfectly, ITA.

Anonymous said...

She used to admit she was ashamed of Dawson Creek.

Yes, I remember that, but maybe she's changed her mind and started to appreciate the show? Rightfully so, if you ask me. It opened her doors for sure.

Anonymous said...

Blue Valentine sounds great! :)

Anonymous said...

Speaking of Dawson's, I remember I liked the character of Pacey. Josh Jackson seems to be a sweet guy.

There was also a rumor about James Van Der Beek having a rl affair with his tv dad. Wonder if that's true?

Anonymous said...

Sooner or later, probably within the next 20 years, there will be a major public backlash.

There will be no backlash. Surrogate mothers aren't the perfect way to have a family, but the same is true for people who are immature or simply bad parents.

Anonymous said...

Here if you're interested, is a beautifully written blog piece from the perspective of a donor child (who is now an adult). Lauren Burns, a donor conceived perspective. It really opened up my eyes about anonymous donors and donors in general and how the donor children are affected. If there is a BT I feel awfully sorry for him/her.

It is crucial to realise that the decision to use a donor to create a family results in life-long consequences for the child who is subsequently born. Every person I know who is donor conceived (about 15) has been affected by it. It is untrue to claim there are no real issues with donor conception, that as long as you tell the child the truth, and tell early, everything will be fine.

Anonymous said...

It really opened up my eyes about anonymous donors and donors in general and how the donor children are affected.

We are all affected by our parent's decisions and families we didn't choose to be born in.
I understand that some people have the need to make connection with their biological "parents" and that is fine as long as biological "parents" feel the same.

Anonymous said...

Here's another article written a few years ago by a young (and gay!) man at age 17, who was egg donor conceived and carried by a surrogate (the same woman). It's not as smoothly written as Lauren Burns, but he puts it out there and hits the nail on the head in all the issues, in my opinion. If there's a BT, this might be what he'll be thinking and feeling in 20 years. Brian, Son of a Surrogate

What about all of the sperm and egg donor babies who will walk around looking at faces wondering who their biological parents are and if they could be Joe Schmoe walking down the street because he has the same jaw line. Is it fair to take away our identities? Would you like that done to you? Would you like to wonder about your parentage or would you like to find out one day that the parents you thought were your bio parents were not?

4:33PM said...

But swirling love juices isn't nonsense, some couples do that. The question is who's the father in BT's birth certificate.

I understand that couples do that - I referred to it as nonsense b/c I don't believe it happened in this case b/c I don't believe there is a BT.

Anonymous said...

OK, I'm finished! I'll give you all a break from my soapbox! Sorry for taking it OT but being reminded of BT (if there's a BT) and the donor/surrogacy got me going.

Anonymous said...

Shocking news from OMG. Jake and Austin have been hanging out recently. That damn Ted is lying about Jake and Austin being a couple. LOL.

Anonymous said...

Huh? 6:32 PM, what are you talking about?

Anonymous said...

Hanging out together or hanging out separately JG Francis style?!

Austin said...

Sitting in exit row. When asked if I could assist in the event of an emergency, I answered in Spanish. Never do th http://twitpic.com/2vokl5
8 Oct

You know you're back in LA when... I love Abogado Juan Dominguez. http://twitpic.com/2vrsy9
8 Oct

Anonymous said...

I don't understand 6:32PM's post either.

shoes said...

eezadiva: shopping in soho with friends... just saw jake gyllenhaal shopping for shoes :-)
about 5 hours ago

NYC said...

StackedBlog: Made eye contact with Jake Gyllenhall #OHYESIDID
21 minutes ago

Anonymous said...

Rocko_Rochee: I just got hit on by a dominatrix, her master in training, and her slave... Only in NY
30 Jul

Rocko_Rochee: I just bumped into Jake Gyllenhal. He's alot bigger & shorter than I thought he would be
about 4 hours

Anonymous said...

Funny how we get a tweet about Jake being in Austin and now we are getting all these tweets about Jake being spotted in NYC.

6:32 says awesome new pictures of J nd A in Detroit on OMG.


Panic time for some.


.

Anonymous said...

In Colorado at Leadville

Anonymous said...

Panic time for some.

I don't understand. Panic about what?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Panic time for some.

I don't understand. Panic about what?



Good question. Why should anybody panic. Its very clear that Jake and Austin are a couple. We all know that.

Anonymous said...

There are a few on the WFT2 side that think Jake and Austin have broken up. Have faith evryone. Jake and Austin are in a loving LTR.

7:28PM said...

Good question. Why should anybody panic. Its very clear that Jake and Austin are a couple. We all know that.

I don't understand why someone is talking in riddles. Are you 7:23PM?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

When were the pics taken and is it really Jake?

OMG

Anonymous said...

^^Just read they are from Sept. 3rd.

Anonymous said...

i>He finished filming on in Detroit on Thursday. This picture was taken on Friday.

http://ohmygodot.blogspot.com/2010/10/missed-it-by-that-much.html

September 3 was Friday.

Anonymous said...

Jake and Austin are in a loving LTR.

What's loving about not wanting to be together when they can?

Anonymous said...

6:32 says awesome new pictures of J nd A in Detroit on OMG.
Panic time for some.

Panic???
1. That guy just might be Austin, no way to prove it.
2. Jake and Austin don't give a damn about being together for months and months, and we should believe that they are together because they maybe spent a weekend with Peter in Colorado? Are you serious?

Human Rights Campaign said...

MrDanZak: "You guys heard I'm gay, right?" says Ricky Martin, 1st speaker @ #HRC dinner. "It took me a while but tonite I'm here."
about 1 hour ago

Anonymous said...

I'm a little confused. First, where did you guys find the Colorado picutures? Second, are we sure it's Austin, Jake and Peter? I must admit that it could be them.
Third, what's the big deal? Wasn't the general consensus that, even if they aren't dating (anymore?), Jaustin are still friends?
So much ado about, actually, nothing. In my humble opinion.

Anonymous said...

8:42 You sound like you are in a panic

Anonymous said...

8:42 You sound like you are in a panic

Why the heck should I be in panic?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Panicking? With Austin and Sophia driving kids to Texas schools while Jake is in NYC?

Anonymous said...

I'll ignore, but I still want to know where the pics come from, out of curiosity.

Anonymous said...

Probably posted by that blogger who attended the race and posted few other pictures of Jake and Peter. Search WDW if you are really interested.

Anonymous said...

Thanks 8:55 PM.

Anonymous said...

The pic was taken by a guy who was in the Leadville race http://brandon.fuller.name/archives/2010/08/20/18.22.00/

Anonymous said...

Funny how we get a tweet about Jake being in Austin and now we are getting all these tweets about Jake being spotted in NYC.

Austin, TX tweet was obviously fake. Or did you forget that there are paparazzi and thousands of people attending music festival?

Anonymous said...

Austin, TX tweet was obviously fake. Or did you forget that there are paparazzi and thousands of people attending music festival?

LMAO! Did you forget that there were hundreds, possibly thousands of people at Leadville and not one tweet about Austin.

Anonymous said...

side by side pic - doesn't look like Austin to me

Anonymous said...

Did you forget that there were hundreds, possibly thousands of people at Leadville and not one tweet about Austin.

People recognize Jake, he is a much bigger star.
Please explain why there are no tweets about Jake from the music festival and there are tweeters about Jake from NYC?

Anonymous said...

high quality original - the ear is totally different, unless BT has been chewing on it!! original photo

Brooklyn said...

suninbloom: thanks Maggie Gyllenhaal, Jake Gyllenhaal, Peter Sarsgaard for having stopping by w/ your Mom @ www.suninbloom.com
about 3 hours ago

Anonymous said...

Isn't Austin a lot taller than Jake? In the Leadville pic "Austin" looks the same height as Jake.

Anonymous said...

Height = 6' 3½" (1.92 m)

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0629538/bio

Anonymous said...

Yes, they [egg donors] aren't part of child's life. Biology is easy, being a parent is hard.

You are amazingly ignorant.

Anonymous said...

11:06 PM, you are amazingly sore loser.

adoptee said...

11:06 PM, you are amazingly sore loser.

LOL, "sore loser" ?!! Because 11:06 called you on your cold, clinical "black or white" sterile view of humanity? Go ahead, go tell an adopted or donor-conceived person that their biology doesn't matter. Either you haven't had any deep real relationships and can't understand the complexity of being human, or are so "head in the sand" delusional and lacking empathy that you dismiss anything that you can't connect with. Until you develop a functioning human soul you are the ultimate loser, in more ways than you will ever realize.

In all of us there is a hunger, narrow and deep, to know our heritage, to know who we are and where we have come from. Without this enriching knowledge, there is a hollow yearning. No matter what our attainments in life, there is a vacuum, an emptiness and a most disquieting loneliness! ~ Alex Haley

destiny said...

Great picture of Cynthia Nixon and her family, I've never seen it before.

It looks an awful lot like Austin to me. Ears are similar (the photo in the side by side is distorted and not good for comparing), same arms, neck and hair color. The man in the photo is not standing completely straight, he's leaning a bit, and his legs are kind of spread. That would take a few inches off of someone's height.

Anonymous said...

That photo was posted on IHJ, GB, WDW, etc back in August, they were taken on Friday, Aug. 20, not Sept. 3rd.

Anonymous said...

With all these tweets of Jake out and about in NYC this weekend and out with his family one might think he be papped.

Jake is in Austin, Texas.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Isn't Austin a lot taller than Jake? In the Leadville pic "Austin" looks the same height as Jake.


Jake is closer to the camera. Not rocket science.

Anonymous said...

Check out how close are their shoulders - it is easy to see that "Austin" is NOT 3½" taller. Hair is different, ear is different - that isn't Austin.

Anonymous said...

With all these tweets of Jake out and about in NYC this weekend and out with his family one might think he be papped.
Jake is in Austin, Texas.


Jake is in NYC for WEEKS but we didn't get any paparazzi pictures. No pictures from NYC Ballet gala night. Lots of tweets from NYC and just one from Austin, Tx.
= Jake is in New York.

Anonymous said...

8.26 trolly was on OMG all last night trying to convince everyone that it's not Austin. Now trolly has started up again.

5:25 PM said...

Because 11:06 called you on your cold, clinical "black or white" sterile view of humanity? Go ahead, go tell an adopted or donor-conceived person that their biology doesn't matter. ...

You can't be serious.

Please stop acting like you can read people's minds based on a few sentences posted here or that reading blogs turned you into some kind of expert.

Anonymous said...

8.26 trolly was on OMG all last night trying to convince everyone that it's not Austin. Now trolly has started up again.

No need for trolly, Leadville pic man doesn't look like Austin.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Austin said...

That white blurry face is Kanye... I mean Frank Sinatra Jr. Awesome. http://twitpic.com/2w9yg6
6 hours ago

Anonymous said...

8.26 trolly was on OMG all last night trying to convince everyone that it's not Austin.

Did OMG discuss Sophia's "about to take @Aus10Nichols's nephew to school in Texas"?

NYC said...

NY_Places: Crossed paths with jake gyllenhaal at Il Buco earlier. More importantly everyone out on a Sat... http://schmap.it/qro5Sw?a (via @theJEWESSS)
about 7 hours ago

(Crossed paths with jake gyllenhaal at Il Buco earlier. More importantly everyone out on a Saturday night is under 25 and super lame)

Anonymous said...

Did OMG discuss Sophia's "about to take @Aus10Nichols's nephew to school in Texas"?

Some thought it was fake while others thought Sophia had sunk to a new low by twtter-whoring Austin's child relatives

Anonymous said...

ryabacker: Spotted on Bond St: Jake Gyllenhaal walking alone, being a true stud.
about 9 hours ago

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Don't be surprised when they declare that those pair of feet that Austin took a pic of in the bathroom are Jake's, I kid you not.

Pee G already has :\

Anonymous said...

9:17 AM, you are joking, right?

Anonymous said...

Plus uncle Ted pissed them off yet again!

With what?

Anonymous said...

9:17 AM, you are joking, right?

No

lol. Man, I just had a realization. Those weren't Jake's calves sticking out from under that urinal, are they?

Then she went searching for photos of Jake wearing the same socks as urinal dude!!

how nice! said...

holdonyourdream: just realzied that sophia &austin have visited eachs families within the last 2 weekends..id love if they were getting engaged :( #oth
1 day ago

prairiegirl said...

I'm sorry, but this one is too good to pass up. It's time to clear this one particular detail up before it gets out of hand.

Did OMG discuss Sophia's "about to take @Aus10Nichols's nephew to school in Texas"?

No, we did not. Take note:

Anonymous re-posted:
Sophia Bush said...
About to take @Aus10Nichols 's nephew to school in Texas. Morning car rides with kids are waaaay #MoreFunThanGossip
4 Oct


This was last weekend.

And since I'm typing and to confirm Jack's one quote up there (**sigh - hello, Jack. **sigh**), just for the record, I don't believe that Sophia was even in Austin last week. Austin has not directly talked to Sophia via Twitter (their tool for the fauxmance) since September 14. Sept. 14 was the last twitter he addressed directly to her.

I believe Sophin is on the outs.

I believe Sophia pulled a Reese "I'm in the Italy wedding courtyard with Jake" Witherspoon last weekend and acted like she was in Austin, TX.

Wow. What a record number of Jake in NYC tweets this weekend. How many is that now? And no one with a cell phone camera on them.

Interesting how a one-shot eye hook-up with J Francis sans any kind of photo back-up is so readily immortalized, but a one-shot tweet of Jake in Austin listening to whatever band that was, is just as readily dismissed and mis-trusted.

Over here now, Jack, since you were being moderated on OMG? shakes head So you're into bathroom humor too, are you? That's sooooo cute.

pee g.

LOLLL! ROFLMAO. SNICKER Oh, man, you are killing me with that one, Jack.;D ;D You're so proud of that one, aren't you? Thought I'd indulge it because I'll tell you, I have got to admire that one.

rolls eyes. Okay, back home now.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Jackie said...

No name calling, please.

Anonymous said...

Jake isn't in TX PG, he's in NY. That was one tweet and nothing else, od since you would think there would be since he was at ACL.

There are tons of tweets of Jake in NY including the one of him at the ballet witha date and of him riding the subway with a girl after the event which OMG ignored.

Why would Sophia pretend to be in Austin, TX last weekend and Austin pretend that he is in L.A. this weekend?

You, SK and the rest know that's not Austin in that pic, you knew that when you first saw it when it and other pics from thast date were posted on G and WDW, that's why it wasnever posted on OMG (IHJ gets the photographers permission before posting, I assume they didn't this time around)

Spooky I guess thinks it's Austin, LOL!! But I doubt she just came across it as well.

Anonymous said...

Austin tweeted that he was in Ausin last weekend and L.A. this weekend, Sophia tweeted that she was inausin last weekend. There was a sighting of her in NY yesterday, but who knows where she is.

The Jake sighting in TX had to have been a look a like since there were no more tweets and there should have been since he was at ACL

Tons of sightings of him in NY including the tweets of him at the ballet with a date and of him riding the subway with a girl which OMG ignored.

SK and Co saw that pic back in August when it was posted on WDW and GB along with other pics from that day. They knew it wasn't Austin then and they know it now, that's why they didn't post it then.

SK at the time was convinced that Jake was there only on that day and left until someone showed her tweets of Jake and Peter there at least until Sunday.

I find it hard to believe that she and the rest there"overlooked" certain things in the pic then since they examine everything.

Obviously Spooky is convinced, LOL!!!

Anonymous said...

Did OMG discuss Sophia's "about to take @Aus10Nichols's nephew to school in Texas"?
No, we did not. Take note:
Anonymous re-posted:
Sophia Bush said...
About to take @Aus10Nichols 's nephew to school in Texas. Morning car rides with kids are waaaay #MoreFunThanGossip
4 Oct
This was last weekend.


Exactly! That was last weekend so OMG had a week to find the tweet and Sophia's picture from Austin, TX and discuss it.

Anonymous said...

Wow. What a record number of Jake in NYC tweets this weekend. How many is that now? And no one with a cell phone camera on them.

Yes, Jake is obviously in NYC.
Please note that you can argue about planting tweets, but NO ONE and NOTHING can stop people from posting tweets + there are thousands of people attending music festival in Austin, TX.

Anonymous said...

Jake is getting noticed more in NYC because his movie is coming out soon. His face is everywhere.

I see famous people all the time but I don’t post/tweet things. (I also don’t post/tweet when I have a really grilled cheese sandwich, either.) I don’t go to celeb hangouts or areas. I can’t tell you the last time I was in the West Village. Real NYers aren’t impressed (after 3 seconds) and then we move on.

I think seeing someone famous on the subway is always surprising so that stands out.

Anonymous said...

lol. Man, I just had a realization. Those weren't Jake's calves sticking out from under that urinal, are they?

Taking and posting pictures from public restrooms - how low can Austin go?

Anonymous said...

u know what who cares where the hell Jake and Austin are this weekend. All that ones needs to know from Yesterdays OMG post is that Jake and Austin were in Colo together for the Leadville 100. No doubt. No argument. The proof is in the pudding.

Anonymous said...

That's not Austin in the pics. SK confessed that she saw the pic back in August on other Jake blogs but she didn't post it because she wasn't sure that was Jake because his back was turned, LOL!!! And she says she didn't notice "austin" in the pic, what crap.

She didn't post ot then because she knew it wasn't Austin and was pissed that yet again Jake and Austin were in seperate states.

There is no proof in your pudding aka pony shit, you are trying too hard sweetie.

Anonymous said...

Interesting how a one-shot eye hook-up with J Francis sans any kind of photo back-up is so readily immortalized, but a one-shot tweet of Jake in Austin listening to whatever band that was, is just as readily dismissed and mis-trusted.

LOL. What an absurd comparison. JGFrancis is an actual person with an actual blog posting under his real name, not some random twitterer. Plus, your "argument" dismisses and ignores all the tweets from NYC. Why would one tweet from Austin, TX, have more validity than numerous tweets from NYC? It doesn't. It's just what you want so badly to be true. I haven't figured out why it is so important to you that J&A be the romance of the century, but you do and it colors you're perspective on everything.

Oh, and btw, if "Sophin" is on the outs you should tell Ted, because he apparently disagrees. Or could it be that Ted is wrong? And if he's wrong about that, what else is he wrong about?

Brooklyn said...

AddieTree: I sat across from Jake Gyllenhaal on the train today. He was wearing duck boots.
about 1 hour ago

Brooklyn said...

suninbloom: Thank you Jake Gyllenhaal for stopping by www.suninbloom.com this AM to grab your Sweet Lady Green juice & Brazilian nut mylk!
about 2 hours ago

NYC said...

ugakerri: OMG JUST WALKED PAST JAKE GYLLENHALL! He is beautiful. Omg omg omg.
about 1 hour ago

Ocean Hill, Brooklyn said...

SMOKEHAAT: I'm standing next to Jake gyllenhal (I think that's how u spell it). Dude is cooler than the other side of the pillow.
about 1 hour ago

Anonymous said...

Bad Jake! Why can't he stay inside this weekend! :)

Anonymous said...

And Austin is in L.A.

I always wondered why OMG never posts Jake tweets, now I know, LOL!!!

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
That's not Austin in the pics. SK confessed that she saw the pic back in August on other Jake blogs but she didn't post it because she wasn't sure that was Jake because his back was turned, LOL!!! And she says she didn't notice "austin" in the pic, what crap.

She didn't post ot then because she knew it wasn't Austin and was pissed that yet again Jake and Austin were in seperate states.

There is no proof in your pudding aka pony shit, you are trying too hard sweetie.



If the picture was held back for any reason it was because SK was nervous about posting it.

Anonymous said...

Why nervous? Austin was with Jake and Peter, or not - nothing more or worse.

Anonymous said...

Oh, one more thing - even if Austin was in Leadville how would that mean a thing? Jake and Austin believers keep forgetting that "they are men in a committed relationship who are raising a child" so making a big thing out of possible hanging out together is really ridiculous.

a bit of info said...

My Week With Marilyn is about to start shooting. Michelle plays Marilyn (as visualized) and Kenneth Branagh will play the supporting role of Sir Laurence Olivier. The drama, based on the book of the same name, takes place during the shooting of The Prince and the Showgirl, and is about Marilyn's week long escape with a crew member (Eddie Redmayne). Other actors doing mimicry include Dougray Scott as Arthur Miller and Julia Ormond as Vivien Leigh.

Anonymous said...

3:44PM, IA, and that's why I don't get all the fuss. Plus, Jaustinites have been saying forever that the fact that J&A are never seen in pics together (excluding with S) is an indication that they are a closeted couple. So, if that is Austin pictured with Jake, does that mean it's indication they aren't a couple? Why would they spend so much time hiding their "true" relationship and then stand together for anyone to take their picture?

damn said...

The Toronto Sun report on homophobia in the Netherlands: "If you think Amsterdam is the gay capital of Europe, you’re half-right, but 10 years out of date. Today it’s the gay-bashing capital of Europe. Because Amsterdam isn’t just gay. Now it’s Muslim, too."

Anonymous said...

Love and Other Drugs international trailer

Anonymous said...

^^Awwww this trailer got to me for some reason, I got teary, but then laughed out loud at the "oh my God" moment. Ha! lol

Anonymous said...

:)

Jersey Tom said...

Anonymous said...
3:44PM, IA, and that's why I don't get all the fuss. Plus, Jaustinites have been saying forever that the fact that J&A are never seen in pics together (excluding with S) is an indication that they are a closeted couple. So, if that is Austin pictured with Jake, does that mean it's indication they aren't a couple? Why would they spend so much time hiding their "true" relationship and then stand together for anyone to take their picture?



That picture with S gave the guys more freedom to be seen together. Not that we will all the time.

Anonymous said...

LumnoMedia: Lol ran into Jake gyllenhaal in soho..... Nice
about 1 hour ago

@jessenorth said...

Seeing The Social Network with @sammyd22! (@ Regal Cinemas Union Square Stadium 14) http://4sq.com/30QwVX
7 hours ago

When we came out of the movie theater, @sammyd22 and I saw Jake Gyllenhaal!
1 hour ago

Anonymous said...

bickyzoo: Jake gyllenhaal just walked by outside lol. Cara's like freaking out and I'm like "this is new york..."
about 2 hours ago

@hyogasm
At Soho O Park, having a Factory Girl lunch. Trying to glare the people sitting at Yulsic's table into getting up.
2 hours ago

JAKE GYLLENHAAL JUST WALKED PAST ME! 8D
2 hours ago

@morganharbin
Sitting in Ms. Dahlia's Cafe waiting on my yummy bfast. I'm making this last day in New York a good one. :)
6 hours ago

I SWEAR I just passed Jake Gyllenhaal!!!!!
2 hours ago

Anonymous said...

That picture with S gave the guys more freedom to be seen together. Not that we will all the time.

Picture with S = picture with Peter S?
Pictures like this one are irrelevant, Jake and Austin have ALL THE FREEDOM to be together in private, but they CHOOSE to spend their free time in different cities.

Anonymous said...

They rearranged the trailer scenes, or there's a new scene - the way Jamie looks at Maggie in bed I haven't seen that in the other trailers?

Jersey Tom said...

S = Sophia The planned photo op in LA of Sophin and Jake was meant to show all that Austin and Sophia are a couple and that Jake and Austin are indeed still friends. So if the two guys are photographed together without her. No big deal. I knew that the minute I saw those three together.

Jersey Tom said...

No one knows how much time Jake and Austin really spend together. Sure seems like there are some panicked stricken people today posting all the tweets of Jake in NYC. I am sure Austin had to head back to NC. They could have been in Austin. No one knows for sure.

Jersey Tom said...

One more point Austin, Texas is not NYC or LA. When folks walk around Soho or the Village they are looking for celebs as is the case in places like Weho.

Anonymous said...

Jake is in NYC. Austin is somewhere else. Just like last X weekends.

Anonymous said...

No one knows how much time Jake and Austin really spend together.

We know that Jake left LA while Austin was there. Then Austin started filming OTH and LOL movie - so we DO know that he wasn't with Jake in NYC, MV or LA. And we have info about Jake spending weekends out and without Austin.

Anonymous said...

Jake wasn't in Austin, that one sighting was another case of mistaken ID. If he was there , there would be more tweets since he was at ACL. Paps are not in Austin, TX but music fans are there for the festival, and no Jake after that false tweet.

Besides Austin tweeted he was in L.A and posted twicpics, I guess he's lying and his tweets are false.

Funny how OMG posters are so eager to believe a false tweet which makes no sense to me since Austin was in L.A.) but totally dismisses Sophia being there with Austin last weekend even though they both tweeted they were there and she even posted a pic.

Tons of tweets of Jake in NYC with his family and the chick on the train and his date at the ballet and with Anne.

Anonymous said...

So if the two guys are photographed together without her. No big deal.

Why would Jake and Austin photos be big deal? Jake bearded for years, Austin is "dating" Sophia, who would conclude that they are boyfriends?

Anonymous said...

I am sure Austin had to head back to NC. They could have been in Austin. No one knows for sure.


Ok what are you saying, You're sure, then no one knows for sure?

You don't know anything for sure either. Jake may not have seen Austin for months now. Who knows? Jake certainly seems to be anywhere but near Mr. Nichols. Always on the opposite coast. Austin is always with Sophia. Stop the madness Jersey Tom. It's quite alright if they are not an item and just friends. Give it up.

If anyone is panicked it just might be YOU.
Have you ever thought of this?

Anonymous said...

Sure seems like there are some panicked stricken people today posting all the tweets of Jake in NYC

Here's what you don't seem to understand, Jersey Tom. No one is in a panic. The OMG and WFT2 worlds are miniscule compared to the rest of the world out there, so everything that goes on in the world doesn't revolve around what gets discussed here and what picture someone "discovered" at OMG. NY is a big place and it's not unusual that a few people are tweeting about seeing Jake. You think there are a lot of tweets because you're focused on him. I'm sure there are tweets about a lot of celebs in NY.

Jersey Tom said...

Anon

Here's what you don't seem to understand, Jersey Tom. No one is in a panic. The OMG and WFT2 worlds are miniscule compared to the rest of the world out there, so everything that goes on in the world doesn't revolve around what gets discussed here and what picture someone "discovered" at OMG.

You sure do. Why the hell is that.

I don't claim I know where any of these people are. But my gut tells me Jake and Austin see each other more than we know. If you don't agree I have no problem with that.
You don't know them and either do I. It is all about conjecture. I have no interest in proving you wrong I just enjoy trying to figure things out. Sorry but nothing you say proves anything to me and you sure spend a lot of time and energy trying. I am sure you are the one posting all these meaningless Tweets. Knock yourself out.

Anonymous said...

Funny that the tweets of Jake in NY are meaningless but the sophomoric rambling tweets by Austin done to gain attention on his part is greeted with fangirl squeals on OMG and that the moron is giving some kind of shout outs.

Ignoring the Jake twEets of him the other night at the ballet with a date and him being spotted with that chick on the train aren't going away, spin away!

Anonymous said...

But my gut tells me Jake and Austin see each other more than we know. If you don't agree I have no problem with that.

Why do you keep ignoring facts? We know for a fact that Jake is in NYC this weekend and that Austin is somewhere else.

Anonymous said...

I am sure you are the one posting all these meaningless Tweets.

Is tweet about Jake in Austin, TX meaningless, too? Or just tweets that prove how Jake and Austin don't give a shit about being together?

Anonymous said...

You sure do. Why the hell is that.

I sure do what, Jersey Tom? I'm a regular poster at WFT and so I'm just chiming in on the discussion that is taking place here. That has nothing to do with what is going in NY or with any tweets. I didn't go over to OMG and look for this discussion.

Sorry but nothing you say proves anything to me and you sure spend a lot of time and energy trying.

I'm not trying to prove anything to you. Believe what you like, but there's no need to get pissed off and paranoid because people don't agree with you.

I am sure you are the one posting all these meaningless Tweets

You know it's this kind of paranoia and absurdity that brings ridicule on yourself and on OMG. Yes, Tom, that's it. The entire world is on this huge conspiracy to make it look like J&A are apart when they are really together. You've caught us! LOL.

Anonymous said...

I really wish the OMG people would GROW up and realize that Ted C is full of shit! Do you HONESTLY TRULY believe that Jake and Austin are still together and have a hidden child somewhere? If so, you're crazy. Absolutely stark nuts. And Ted C's assertion "I just know" is ridiculous. He knows he's full of shit but because Toothy Tile is his most famous BV, he's not going to admit he's full of crap; besides, he never said it was Jake and as long as he doesn't out Toothy then it doesn't matter what he says.

Ted C is an asshole and a liar. He is not a fan of women because if he were he wouldn't call EVERY SINGLE FRIGGIN WOMAN who dates a guy he's hot for a beard. And by the way, bi men do go out with women--are the women beards in this instance? No.

You've been had by a liar. Now personally I do think Jake is bi but I also think Ted C is full of horseshit. I think it's sad that so many of you take what he says (he even refers to women as "fish"--an ugly gay misogynistic slur) as gospel truth. He's a pig and an opportunist--on the level of Perez.

Anonymous said...

Beating a dead horse again Jack? I know you think it's Austin, that's why you're so riled up. And I've never ever seen someone get so worked up people they think are crazy and irrational--OMG and Ted.

It's like all those politicians and preachers who get riled up about how awful homosexuals are, then fuck around with rent boys and men.

Anonymous said...

I'm not "Jack" PG< SK, or whoever you are, nice try.

You are irrational and nuts, if you want to believe Ted than that's your business but don't get pissed when someoen says otherwise and call them trolly and Jack, how childish.

IMO, Ted is full of shit, there is no BT Jake and Austin id they were ever together are now done and no I don't think that was Austin standing next to Jake in that pic taken back in Augusr.

Now go ahead and call me trolly!

PS: No one is getting worked up but you and the OMG posters who know that isn't Austin, they are just pretending and they are pissed that Jake is in NY

Anonymous said...

I posted on 9:07 and I'm neither male nor Jack. And I'm not a troll, although Ted certainly is.

Anonymous said...

PS: No one is getting worked up but you and the OMG posters who know that isn't Austin, they are just pretending and they are pissed that Jake is in NY



That statement has just proved you are dilusional.

prairiegirl said...

No, you're not Jack.


You're eastcoastfan. I'd know your repetitive, Ted-hating, JIB or JIS spiel after a fifteen year drought.

ECF, you give yourself away every time. Come on and bring it over to OMG and badmouth us over there face to face.

prairiegirl said...

I'm not "Jack" PG< SK, or whoever you are, nice try.

Oh, and by the way, ECF, this is my first comment since the Sophia Twitter correction. And Special does not even lurk here, let alone comment.

So you can suspect somebody else. It wasn't me. And it wasn't Special. When I talk to you, I'm going to identify myself so you'll know who it is.

Anonymous said...

How do you know where SK lurks or doesn't lurk PG? Does she tell you? LOL!!!
Don't want to go to PMG the few that's left there that posts are nuts like you/

Besides, everytime SK is busted she puts the mod on.

This latest sad attempt with the pic you and SK saw in August and knew it wasn't Austin, dusted off and pretending otherwise because you are pissed at Ted, Jake, Austin, mysterious chick at the ballet/train and the city of NY is beyond pathetic.

BTW: Austin is in L.A. and Jake is in NY!!!!!

Go back to OMG PG

Anonymous said...

OT

I happened to see Alan Cumming on PBS tonight introducing a program - the man's gorgeous voice could drive you insane! He's quite dashing. :)

destiny said...

I do talk to Special, and I know she doesn't post here. She has no idea what is even being discussed here.

The only time OMG is moderated is when a troll starts calling people ugly names and otherwise getting downright nasty. No blog is going to stand for that kind of behavior--Jackie deletes those kinds of posts too.

Anonymous said...

Oh please Destiny, the reason why so many posters left OMG is because she allowed nasty trolling on there that was pointed at other posters all becuase she liked the number of comments no mater how nasty.

The only time she puts the mod on us when she is busted and people post stuff that proves it like she did today.

SK does post here among other blogs and you know it.

Stop worrying about whats posted here and go back to freeper tinhat central, OMG.

prairiegirl said...

You're so not worth this, Jack. Knock yourself out.

Love you.

Anonymous said...

I'm not Jack--I'm a female and for the record, I don't think Jake is straight. I think he's bi--HOWEVER, I do not buy Ted's nonsense about Jake/Austin being a serious long term couple and their having a child together. It's ridiculous--and I don't think EVERY WOMAN JAKE DATES is a beard! I dislike Reese but his relationship with her, however misconceived on his part, was most likely real! That doesn't mean he's not attracted to some men as well--yeah, I do think he wanted to get some with JG Francis and I do believe some of Ian Halperin's scoops about Jake and a producer and Jake being in love with Heath. But I don't buy Ted C's fairy tales about Jake/Austin (I do think they were fuck buddies a long while ago--but no more--but I do think they're on very good terms). I don't understand WHY OH WHY OMG'ers are so wedded to Ted's fairly tale. Can't you see what a pathological lair he is? Can't you see how hateful he is when it comes to smearing women, particularly those who have the nerve of dating men Ted has the hots for or who are objects of Ted's slash fanfic/blind vices?

I'm not Jack. Please grow up. There are A LOT more important things in life than the idea that Jake and Austin are still together. What's the big deal if they're not and if Jake is bi? The world won't come to an end and life will still go on.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
prairiegirl said...

Okay, 12:05, let me see if I have this right.

To you, the world is a sex buffet for Jakey G. He picked up his bland, porcelain plate while in his teenage years and since that time, has gone down the line, picking & choosing the men he wants to nail.

And you, yourself, are going down a buffet line, picking and choosing the hook-up stories you want to believe. And even the story of Jake & Austin you want to treat like a Gumby doll, twisting and turning it how you want to believe it.

And in summation, you prefer and get off on a Jakey G who is a promiscuous whore, fucking men left and right, desires a woman like Reese Witherspoon in between the whoring, eyeballs anyone who moves, and is unable to commit to anyone, man or woman.

That Jakey G is more believable and preferred by you than a young man capable of falling in love, wants to commit to someone and raise a family.

Wanting Jake to be a slut rather than a maturing, responsible, even domesticated man sounds more like slash fulfillment to me.

Anonymous said...

Troll has exhausted all their efforts to disprove Jake is gay that baby tile exists and that Jake and Austin are a couple. All he or she does is spew about Ted being a liar and rely on twitter sightings to allege that they are not together. No credibility at all. Funny how Jake is all over NY but not one picture of him has surfaced even at a public event where other celebs were photographed. Planted twitter sightings is more like it. Planted to create an alibi. Jake has stayed on the east coast while Austin is filming there to make it easier for he and Austin to get together unseen. Thanks for calling Ted names. It keeps him mentioning Toothy and dropping Jake clues for us followers.

Anonymous said...

PG, I never said he was a promiscuous whore. I said he was probably bi, hardly a euphemism for promiscuous whore. You really are twisted, aren't you? Jake is single and he probably gets around a bit--he's a handsome rich actor but I doubt he gets around like an athlete and even if he did, so what? He's single and he's definitely not in a long term serious relationship with Nichols nor are they raising a baby together? Seriously, what is it to you to believe Ted's garbage? Why do you need to believe it so much? And why do you endorse Ted's hatred of women by calling them ALL beards, even when they're not?

Anonymous said...

PG and Co don't care if Ted smears women, that hate other women, straight women anyway.

LOL, Ted doesn't do that.

Anonymous said...

Can't you see how hateful he is when it comes to smearing women, particularly those who have the nerve of dating men Ted has the hots for or who are objects of Ted's slash fanfic/blind vices?

What??? You are too naive for Hollywood business.

Anonymous said...

What's the big deal if they're not and if Jake is bi? The world won't come to an end and life will still go on.

No big deal, but Jake didn't date the chin and he's gay.

Anonymous said...

All he or she does is spew about Ted being a liar and rely on twitter sightings to allege that they are not together. No credibility at all.

There are tons of tweets about Jake, Austin tweets and posts photos about visiting Austin, TX or LA. So Jake's PR is faking twitter accounts and Austin posts fake photos? That is credible?
So why did Jake left Austin in LA and spend a lot of time away from Austin this summer (LA, MV) if he's desperate to be with Austin? Are all Jake tweets and sightings and photos faked?

Anonymous said...

Ted's hatred of women by calling them ALL beards, even when they're not?

Oh my, you really like cheap publicity whores :)

DL gossip said...

A rumor I found out to be true: Channing Tatum.

I never believed he was anything but straight, then I saw him at a super gay party in Hollywood.

I asked who the guy he was with and my friend said, "huh? Oh, that's his boyfriend."

No mention of the wife or anything. Just like Hugh Jackman, the guys don't even mention Debbie.

prairiegirl said...

yeah, I do think he wanted to get some with JG Francis

JG Francis - someone he allegedly met about once prior to eye hook-up? And was promptly ready to hang out with? "hang out with" = get some?

I do believe some of Ian Halperin's scoops about Jake and a producer

The producer - was he a man Jake also supposedly had an intimate/loving relationship with as well as sex?


I don't buy Ted C's fairy tales about Jake/Austin (I do think they were fuck buddies)

Fuck Buddies - someone you hook up with only for animalistic sex. No talking. No bonding. No dating. Pure, hot sex, hi-fuck-thanks-bye. Is that a fuck buddy? Is there anyyyy...dating in there anywhere? Or just fucking?

No, wait! What was it you said later?

but I do think they're on very good terms

Oh, okay. So once every 13 months, Jake & Austin used to/still do meet for a fuck and then 'Hey, see you next year. Oh -- and, hey - thanks!'


I don't think EVERY WOMAN JAKE DATES is a beard!

he probably gets around a bit.

Is that the new term for dating when it comes to bi-sexual men? Gets around? They date women -- like Reese -- but when it comes to the men side of it, it's just for fucking.

Help me out. I'm just trying to see in everything you have said so far, where the idea of Jake having a mutually enriching, passionate, loving, possibly long-term relationship with another man is a hot idea to you. Because so far all I'm seeing is "get around", "get some", and "fuck buddies" when it comes to Jake and other men.

Wow. So what exactly is promiscuous to you?

Anonymous said...

Jake having a mutually enriching, passionate, loving, possibly long-term relationship with another man sounds great to me, but it is easy to see that Jake doesn't date Austin. Maybe there is someone else in his life?

prairiegirl said...

Well, since Jake has known Austin since 2002 and continues to see him, I myself wouldn't even say they're dating. lol.

Okay, I'm open. Who is it Jake is involved with right now? Ted sure as heck doesn't know who it is. JG Francis? Chris? Some totally mystery, unknown guy? Possibly.

So, that's why Jake looks so hot in the Paul Bunyan beard. That's why he's being papped hitting the dance clubs and getting mentions exiting very nice restaurants via back doors all the time. That's why Ted's got so many stories of Toothy Tile hooking up or having a hot affair with another guy. Because you know Ted would love to have another tale to embellish his TT archives.

That's why he's driving a glorified station wagon - now there's a hot vehicle for dating/brand new relationship. Where is this guy? Was he on MV this summer? Then why is he in Brooklyn now? In L.A. for the late summer? Was this new dude in Pittsburgh for LAOD filming? Morocco for six months? Montreal during Source Code?

I dunno, what's your theory? Seems to me like Jake's been a real roving guy lately. He does seem fixated on the east coast right now, though which is a real first. So maybe his new relationship is in New York? Surely something will leak at some point.

Surely twitter or FB sightings will at some point begin to pick up on some great looking guy being consistently seen with Jake. You would think, wouldn't you? After all, Austin never gets FB'd or twittered in his company; that's why he's been ruled out.

Or hey - Maybe Jake's just being celibate all this time for the past 3 years.

I dunno. I'm stumped.

I'm done. Geesh. Please come visit me next door when there's a good lead on who Jake's new guy is.

Anonymous said...

LOL at 12:05AM and all the ranting and raving in the posts. I'm not an OMGer or a Jaustinte, but for chrissakes, you can hardly say you're not getting worked up - you're getting as worked up as anyone. Read some of your posts. None of this is actually worth getting that pissed off about. You're right - the world won't come to an end and life will still go on - no matter what any of these people are doing and no matter what Ted says or doesn't say.

Anonymous said...

I'm done. Geesh. Please come visit me next door when there's a good lead on who Jake's new guy is.

Prairiegirl,
we know that Jake and Austin aren't together any more because they don't care about being together. Saying that does NOT mean that we claim to have info about Jake's sex life. Trying to use "you don't have info about Jake's sex life" as an "Jake and Austin are together" argument is plain silly.

Anonymous said...

Where is this guy? Was he on MV this summer? Then why is he in Brooklyn now? In L.A. for the late summer? Was this new dude in Pittsburgh for LAOD filming? Morocco for six months? Montreal during Source Code?

As you KNOW, Austin wasn't with Jake at any of the locations you mentioned - but you always ignore "small details" like that.

Anonymous said...

Today is National Coming Out Day :)

Anonymous said...

Well, since Jake has known Austin since 2002 and continues to see him, I myself wouldn't even say they're dating. lol."

Yes, I'm sure he sees him but that doesn't mean they're dating or fucking or living together. You have NO PROOF--nothing outside of Ted's fairy tales. Do you know Jake personally? Do you sleep under his bed? PG, you're demented and delusional if you can say absolutely you know Reese was a beard and Jake and Austin are involved in a long-term romantic relationship. You do NOT know this unless you're in Jake's inner circle, which you are not (and thank god for that where Jake is concerned because you're nuts).

Anonymous said...

^^ It is :) Best wishes to all those who have found the courage to do so:

HRC Coming Out Project

Anonymous said...

Fuck Buddies - someone you hook up with only for animalistic sex. No talking. No bonding. No dating. Pure, hot sex, hi-fuck-thanks-bye. Is that a fuck buddy? Is there anyyyy...dating in there anywhere? Or just fucking?

Wrong Ms Prairiegirl. a fuck buddy can be good friends, an associate. I would not say that a stranger that a guy or woman picks up for random sex can be considered a {fuck buddy}. The deffinition of the word is there, ie (Buddy). People who know each other. To what extent their relationship is, only they know and can define it, regardless of how often sex occurs, but deffinately not strangers.
Most buddies, at least guys don't have to date. They hang out. Get with it Ms. Prairiegirl.

Jake and Austin are friends and can be considered buddies.

Animalistic Sex? Sounds like a slash story.

Anonymous said...

you're demented and delusional if you can say absolutely you know Reese was a beard

There is nothing delusional about Reese Witherspoon being a beard - we have 10.000 photographs as proof.

Anonymous said...

And a few videos! :)

Anonymous said...

9:03AM needs to calm down before they hurt themselves, lol.

Anonymous said...

HRC Coming Out Project

Jake, I'm sure that will help! :)

Anonymous said...

PG is sure spending a lot of time here, why does she care what some here think?

Ted said...

Bitch Back

Dear Ted:
I have learned so much about how Hollywood works over the years from you. I have a question about how bearding works. Do the girls' friends and family know that the relationship is fake? It just seems that lots of people would likely know the truth, and they can't all be great secret keepers. And not to be greedy, but if there is a big wedding, does the guy's real love attend and have to look happy?
—Samantha D

Dear Beardolitics:
There are a select few, very select, who know the ins and outs of a faux relationship, and usually it's just the reps and handlers. For the most part, the secretive relaysh is bound in print. Literally.


Dear Ted:
What is going on with Parrish Maguire? We had a few updates this summer, but any word if he has he changed his closeted tune? Or is he laying low, doing what his handlers want?
—Evans

Dear Do What Your Told:
We feel bad for Parrish; he really is a mini Toothy Tile. He's running with his crew on the down-low (unless you live in Hollywood, then his sexuality isn't exactly a secret), still insisting that this is just an "experimental phase."


Dear Ted:
I love all of the Blind Vice articles, but I was thinking, why don't you "out" them all. It would get you a ton of publicity and then everyone would know the truth. And will you ever reveal Toothy Tile's identity.
—Curious

Dear No Way:
I would never out someone, celeb or not.

Anonymous said...

We need National Outing Day! Pronto! ;)

More Ted said...

Bitch Back


Dear Ted:
Does Anderson Cooper have a Blind Vice? Do you agree that his efforts regarding teen bullying would have more clout if his own personal situation was clarified?
—XXOO

Dear The Coop Poop:
While I do think that discussing one's sexuality helps an audience relate them to the topic at hand, I definitely don't think it's necessary for A.C. to "clarify" his "personal situation." Kuddos to him for taking such an active stand on the issue.


Dear Ted:
I've been a loyal reader for years, have tuned numerous friends onto your genius, and have two wonderful rescue dogs that also adore you. You've got to tell me, because I'm dying to know: What is Shafterella up to these days? You've updated us on Toothy, so how about a little news on his former beard.
—JL

Dear Given The Shaft:
I'm still totally pissed at Shafty for how she treated Toothy, so screw her and the new dude that she has. Of course she thinks she's totally in love with him, though, if that's what you're curious about.

Anonymous said...

Shafterella - wrong and wrong.

Anonymous said...

Parrish Maguire: Top guess - Taylor Lautner

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 3908   Newer› Newest»