Wednesday 12 May 2010

Why Ricky Matters (to me... and maybe a few other boys)

By Lorenzo Herrera y Lozano

March 30, 2010

There’s been a lot of commotion regarding Ricky Martin’s recent coming out statement on his official website. As with most things in life these days, I learned about the news on Facebook. So, I immediately posted about the news as well and quickly joined in the jubilee of queerness and pranced about the office like a middle school-aged boy who accidently touched hands with his classroom crush. I even committed the blasphemy of comparing the news to that of Health Care Reform and the release of Apple’s iPad (insert sound of angel choir here).

And then, of course, there was the storm of cattiness that followed the news. As a queer Xicano, I admit that sarcasm is built into my genetic code. The survivor of four Christian-themed religions and 500+ years of white supremacist occupation, I find humor, irony and disbelief in most things. Still, yesterday I just wanted to celebrate.

I agree that the fact that Ricky is gay is not all that shocking. Queer men and not long speculated or asserted that he shook his bon bon far too well to be straight. Plus, for us jotos/maricones/patos, there was the added benefit of dreaming him up queer, which somehow put us that much closer to his arms.

Still, as the catty remarks continue, as people boast about how they knew and think he should have done this 10 years ago, or sassy queens dismiss the news as inconsequential, I say, look beyond our borders (geographic, cultural, and age-based) and take a minute to honor the fact that for many, Ricky’s coming out is groundbreaking, perhaps even life-saving.

Ricky Martin
Ricky Martin at the 2010 Billboard Latin Music Awards
April 29, 2010


So Ricky was doing more than living la vida loca; he was, in fact, a loca. To the trained eye, this is just confirmation that our gaydar runs on more than hormones and dreams.

Hormones, dreams and cattiness aside, I challenge the ungleeful remarks about Ricky’s coming out.

As with most performers who began as Spanish-language artists, Ricky began over 10 years ago. The Barbara Walters interview (assuming it was Barbara, I can never tell who is behind that cloud of light) did have me on the edge of my teenage self, hoping he’d come out and proclaim his gayness, but it wasn’t his beginning. Ricky’s career began decades ago.

Long before the Latin Explosion, which was more of a Latin Spark, Ricky had left his imprint on the Spanish pop scene of the late 80’s and early to mid-90’s. Back when Thalía and Paulina were still artists and relevant, before Gloria Trevi’s traumatic (for her and her fans) imprisonment in Brazil, and before Alejandra Guzmán would be hospitalized for too much botox on her behind, there was a cultural movement in Latin America.

As a pre-teen growing up in a rural town of 300 in northern México, Thalía, Paulina, Gloria, Alejandra and Ricky were my window into another world. Their performances pushed, albeit at times gently and censured, the boundaries of repressive cultural norms. From flowers wrapped around a microphone to songs about teen pregnancy and abortion, these young performers were resisting and embodying another realm of cultural possibilities. Ricky gave boys the excuse (and perhaps reason) to shake our hips in ways that would otherwise be condemned as obscene.

The dismissal of Ricky’s coming out seems to be rooted in an U.S.-centric perspective where we have the opportunity to stop celebrating any queer image on TV and offer our critique. There is so much gayness these days that we can spend our days and dissertations balking at how a character isn’t gay enough, is too gay, is too white, etc. And although we don’t actually have the type of representation GLAAD and I would like to see, we have a whole lot more than we did in México in 1992 (except, of course, Ricky gently caressing his long hair on stage… oh, and Locomía).

I am not critiquing the fact that we spend so much time criticizing queer portrayals in the media. To the contrary, I am celebrating the fact that we can. In fact, I’d go further and ask why queer people of color media performance and productions are so weak, lame and superficial. Having once curating a queer people of color cultural arts program, I know we can do better.

What I am critiquing is that our criticisms of Ricky’s coming out has us falling into the pitfall of imagining and defining all things queer through a U.S. lens. I even joked about the fact that he used the term “homosexual” to define himself. And now, in retrospect I find that identifying as a “fortunate homosexual” was much more powerful than a simple “gay.”

Perhaps for the jaded queen living in urban U.S., the oversaturation of gayness in the media has deemed Ricky insignificant and worthy of our dismissal. For that frightened and confused 12 year old in rural Chihuahua, it’s monumental.

My coming out process was stumped by the fact that I could not even imagine my queerness, let alone live it. At the time, the saturation of gayness was mostly strictly white. It wasn’t until queer brown men like Jaime Cortez and Emanuel Xavier fearlessly (or perhaps fearfully) exposed their work and their bodies to the sun of public criticism, that I was able to imagine myself.

Whether U.S. fags approve or not, Ricky is a prominent figure here, and more importantly, in Latino América. Ricky’s coming out makes it possible for young boys in countless homes to imagine themselves as something other than confused.

For this, I say to Ricky: gracias. And, you know where to find me.

Source: Guest post: "Why Ricky Matters" by Lorenzo Herrera y Lozano

Ricky Martin on Twitter

2,794 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 400 of 2794   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

^^Don't use that tired argument again. The Jake.Must.Be.Gay or I'll hold my breath and turn blue crowd are the ones who are rattled. They actually read more into it than others, so it must be very upsetting, why I don't know. :(

Anonymous said...

re-reading my comment, I'm thinking that the drunk drunk part actually probablly best describes the state jake was probably in. Would hate to think how he felt the next morning... ouch!

Anonymous said...

He actually looked like he was having a bit of fun. It looked real to me - there's no way to know what happened after the after party, and it wouldn't be wise on his part. But there's nothing wrong with flirting.

Anonymous said...

Who'd have thought the sight of Jake drunk drunk dancing with some women would NOT convince people that he was as staight as an arrow could send trolly into such a tail spin.

Even Jake getting married to a woman and having a baby (which I think will happen in a few years) won't change TBers minds about Jake being gay. Nothing that implies he might be bi or straight will change TBers minds. Nothing. That is the only real fact on here.

Anonymous said...

She needs to be trashed, because she is constantly running amok on the blogs when she's not agreed with.

I get it, trashing Destiny and posting made up bullshit about her posts is much easier than finding arguments that make sense and discussing.

Anonymous said...

I actually thought it was fun to see him enjoying himself. He looked like just a regular guy having fun, albeit ten times better looking. :) It's fun to meet and talk to people from other countries, and who wouldn't love sampling vodka and food. He probably had a guide(s) and a translator(s), some of those people could be that.

Anonymous said...

The Jake.Must.Be.Gay or I'll hold my breath and turn blue crowd are the ones who are rattled.

That old troll crap again? Geez.

Anonymous said...

9:41, if anyone puts it out there, they are going to get a response in return. Destiny is no exception.

Anonymous said...

9:42 AM, I think most of the young people invited to the party know at least a bit English.

Anonymous said...

A lot of fangirls claimed that Clay Aiken isn't gay. I rest my case, lol!

Anonymous said...

9:39.. calm down!! People are allowed to believe what they want, and also to discuss gossip (true and un-true) as much as they like. It's not harming you (or anyone else) and it entertains people so what is the problem. If you don't want to read about what people who like the idea of Jake possibly being gay say go and create a 'Jake is straight and will be getting married to a woman and having a baby (in a few years)' blog.

Something tells me it won't be nearly as entertaining as this one.

Anonymous said...

9:41, if anyone puts it out there, they are going to get a response in return. Destiny is no exception.

Responses are OK, nonsensical shit is not.

Anonymous said...

Jake doesn't speak Russian though, that I know of. Yes, people do speak English, but it's difficult for one who doesn't know the country's language, or alphabet, when traveling.

John said...

Even Jake getting married to a woman and having a baby (which I think will happen in a few years) won't change TBers minds about Jake being gay.

I'm 100% straight!

Worlds thinnest books said...

Straight Hollywood actors by Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences

Anonymous said...

:)

Anonymous said...

If you don't want to read about what people who like the idea of Jake possibly being gay say

Possibly being gay? No, for most posters it's a fact that he is gay.

Anonymous said...

Posted on OMG by PoP videos

PoP Press Conference - Russia

destiny said...

I get it, trashing Destiny and posting made up bullshit about her posts is much easier than finding arguments that make sense and discussing.

Trolly doesn't know how to put together a coherent argument, that's why he bashes posters instead. Since it's hard to trash anons, he singles out people who post by name.

Trolly doesn't know how to read either, as he never gets what I say right.

Trolly doesn't seem to know that I could care less what a troll says about me.

Poor trolly, getting off on trolling, picturing everyone getting mad and upset and crying, booo hooo. Trolly porn. Talk about fantasy!

Anonymous said...

Try to calm down, dear. It'll be alright. Maybe you don't communicate as well as your deluded mind thinks it does? Just a thought.

Anonymous said...

10:14 AM - trolls can't calm down.

Kagan is Trash said...

Jake gets gayer by the day.

Anonymous said...

Awww, that was so nice. Thanks for posting the link to the press conference. :)

Anonymous said...

10:27 AM #1 - what did Kagan do?

Anonymous said...

Aww this brings back fond memories of a trip to Europe with friends from Norway. I hate to generalize, but I met some of the warmest, loveliest, huggingest people. It was beautifu, I could live there!

Anonymous said...

9:39, no one is forcing you to be here or to read any of the posts. It obviously bothers you. You need to ask yourself, then, why you are here if it's such a trial for you.You also might want to ask yourself why it bothers you that people believe Jake is gay. You admit that you're not going to change anyone's mind with your silly and repetitive lectures so it seems pathetic to keep repeating yourself.

Anonymous said...

Destiny is a fucking loon.

Anonymous said...

10:48 AM, you still don't have any arguments to offer?

Anonymous said...

You can't expect Jack to actually think when he has one hand on the keyboard and one hand around his twig 10:59.

Anonymous said...

Lovely Jake interview, he mentions little Matti and Ramona.

interview

Anonymous said...

Can't watch videos - who is little Matti?

Anonymous said...

Can't watch videos - who is little Matti?

Matilda.

It's a lovely interview. They talk about PoP, the interviewer mentions DD and BBM too. And the two little girls in his life (Ramona, Matilda). She also asks Jake if he wants to become a daddy one day.

Anonymous said...

^^Oh btw. the interviewer liked PoP. :)

Anonymous said...

And the two little girls in his life (Ramona, Matilda).

AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW :)

Anonymous said...

Did you really expect the interviewer to say so Jake, I hear the movie is trite and mediocre. Disney must have a moratorium on reviews as so far only 4 critic reviews are on RT.

Anonymous said...

Awwww. :) Matilda and Ramona.

Anonymous said...

"a responsibility I'm proud to have" LOL, more platitudes. Heath - check, Matilda - check. Nice work, PR.

Anonymous said...

"a responsibility I'm proud to have" LOL, more platitudes. Heath - check, Matilda - check. Nice work, PR.

It's the interviewer who brought up his private life.
It was a great interview, Jake did nothing wrong. Stop attacking the guy all the time for no reason!

Anonymous said...

Or 11:36 AM is pissed that Jake didn't mention BT? Probably!

Anonymous said...

She also asks Jake if he wants to become a daddy one day.

Oh God, I hope Jake didn't talk about the right woman ;)

Anonymous said...

Wow, that was one of the best interviews with Jake yet. Lorraine Kelly is so lovely and tural, and must have put him at ease. So nice to know that he is in Matilda's life, so nice for Heath's memory. Such passionate glances in the clip from Prince of Persia. *swoon* I love Gemma's hair in that clip too.

Anonymous said...

lovely and natural, sorry - Jake was very relaxed

Anonymous said...

It's the interviewer who brought up his private life.

LOL, you don't know how PR works do you. Funny how Heath and Matilda didn't exist until Jake's PoP promo. ;)

Anonymous said...

LOL, you don't know how PR works do you. Funny how Heath and Matilda didn't exist until Jake's PoP promo. ;)

You have the worst opinion of Jake, do you?

I don't share your opinion.

Anonymous said...

Lorraine Kelly is so lovely and tural, and must have put him at ease.

She seems to be a very sweet person. :)

Anonymous said...

"a responsibility I'm proud to have" LOL, more platitudes. Heath - check, Matilda - check.

Someone is pissed off because Heath was a friend and Jake is in contact with Michelle and Matilda :)

Anonymous said...

Someone is pissed off because Heath was a friend and Jake is in contact with Michelle and Matilda :)

Ding, ding! ;)

Anonymous said...

Funny how Heath and Matilda didn't exist until Jake's PoP promo.

There is nothing funny about this. Last Jake's interviews are from 2007 - Heath was alive and Matilda had a father.

Anonymous said...

LOL, you don't know how PR works do you.

Babblers are beyond pathetic.

Anonymous said...

Now Jake has to prepare for promotional work in the US. I've heard the SATC team has already started.

Anonymous said...

Well, Jake answered the questions fine in the interview, pretty much what you would expect him to say. But the interviewer made me cringe - a lot of her questions were just insipid, she talked too much (I actually think she spent more time speaking than Jake did) and I thought she came off looking like a silly fangirl. And the part at the end where she kept saying she couldn't believe he was single and if she were 20 years younger - *gag* - I hardly think she was putting Jake at ease. I mean, he was trying to be polite, but how is he supposed to respond to that kind of silliness.

Anonymous said...

Someone is pissed off because Heath was a friend and Jake is in contact with Michelle and Matilda :)

Pissed off? Hardly. I’m not a fangirl who believes everything Jake says. Excuse me for using my brain.

Anonymous said...

By smiling sweetly!

Anonymous said...

11:55 AM - I had the impression that Jake felt comfortable with her and that he liked her.

Anonymous said...

how is he supposed to respond to that kind of silliness

By smiling sweetly!

Anonymous said...

Excuse me for using my brain.

LOL.

Anonymous said...

Nonsense. She's charming, just being herself.

Anonymous said...

There is nothing funny about this. Last Jake's interviews are from 2007 - Heath was alive and Matilda had a father.

Heath died two years ago, in all that time Jake couldn’t talk about him or Matilda in one of the many publications that did tributes to him? I guess he saved it all for when it would be useful to him.

Anonymous said...

The important thing is that he is in Matilda's life.

Anonymous said...

Excuse me for using my brain.
LOL.


I'm glad you're finding it funny, silly. :)

Anonymous said...

I could identify with Lorraine! :)

Anonymous said...

Pissed off? Hardly. I’m not a fangirl who believes everything Jake says.

I see. You believe that Jake would use a dead person and his daughter for a bit of PR?

Anonymous said...

Heath died two years ago, in all that time Jake couldn’t talk about him or Matilda in one of the many publications that did tributes to him? I guess he saved it all for when it would be useful to him.

You are seeing it all black. Often things aren't what they seem on the surface. Jake's not perfect, but I think he has a good heart and a sense of responsibility. But some seem to only see the negative sides of him (probably out of anger, because he didn't come out yet). That's unfair.

Anonymous said...

The important thing is that he is in Matilda's life.

Oh yes, just like every man needs to find the right woman. If Jake says it then it must be true because he never lies and he doesn’t care about his image, not one bit.

Anonymous said...

I see. You believe that Jake would use a dead person and his daughter for a bit of PR?

Sorry to say that I do.

Anonymous said...

in all that time Jake couldn’t talk about him or Matilda in one of the many publications that did tributes to him

What tributes?
Jake didn't do any interviews during reeking, he talked a bit about plants and glasses for poor. Why would Jake put himself in a position to be questioned and to lie about Reeke?

Anonymous said...

Sorry to say that I do.

Wow, you really have a bad opinion of Jake. Are you still a fan of his, or just waiting for his big day when he finally comes out of the closet?

Anonymous said...

Sorry to say that I do.

Sorry to say that you're a sorry excuse for a human being.

Anonymous said...

I’m not a fangirl who believes everything Jake says.

So you believe that Jake doesn't really care about Ramona either?

Anonymous said...

What tributes?
Jake didn't do any interviews during reeking, he talked a bit about plants and glasses for poor. Why would Jake put himself in a position to be questioned and to lie about Reeke?


It’s not nice to play dumb, and please don’t use the bearding as an excuse for Jake's silence. Lots of friends, costars, peers of Heath paid tributes to him in editions dedicated to Heath in Interview magazine, Entertainment Weekly, etc. Where was Jake then if he so cared about his "friend" and his kid?

Anonymous said...

I don't need to second guess why Jake would talk about Matilda in an interview. His word is good enough for me. It has nothing to do with the article in GQ, but keep trying to drive that point home for your own purposes. :(

Anonymous said...

Where was Jake then if he so cared about his "friend" and his kid?

Dealing with his loss. Doesn't make him a liar.

Anonymous said...

Sorry to say that you're a sorry excuse for a human being.

That’s okay, I have thick skin, I prefer insults to fangirl ignorance. :)

Anonymous said...

12:20 PM - do you believe that Jake doesn't really care about Ramona either?

Anonymous said...

Dealing with his loss. Doesn't make him a liar.

Dealing with his loss for two years? I don’t think so.

Anonymous said...

12:20 PM - do you believe that Jake doesn't really care about Ramona either?

No, I think he loves her.

Anonymous said...

It has nothing to do with the article in GQ, but keep trying to drive that point home for your own purposes. :(

It does. You're forgetting that Jake talked about her dad there, with the other bunch of PR drivel.

Anonymous said...

No, I think he loves her.

Jake loves Ramona, but uses Matilda as a publicity tool. How transparent can you be?

Anonymous said...

Dealing with his loss for two years? I don’t think so.

Why can't you stand Jake's friendship with Heath?

Anonymous said...

We've seen Jake with Ramona plenty over the years, and he's talked about her before now. This is the first time I've ever heard Jake talk about Matilda. I do think he cares about Ramona, and maybe Matilda, but I'm skeptical that he he ever really sees Michelle and Matilda.

I do think he is using Matilda, and maybe even Ramona, to creat a family guy image for POP. ANd let's not forget the "children in my life" comments. They always come back and correct the little things we point out here, and so he's got to work in Matilda to account for the plural.

Anonymous said...

Why does any of this - what Jake has said or hasn't said - seem to matter so deeply for some of you? It's not going to bring Heath back. Or is it the need to constantly find fault with him because it's much easier to do that than to take stock of your own life?

Anonymous said...

Why can't you stand Jake's friendship with Heath

Discussing whether Jake is exploiting Heath and Matilda now has absolutely nothing to do with that.

It's just like the fact that I have no problem with Maggie being Jake's sister and the fact that they seem to have a very close relationship, but it didn't stop me from thinking that Jake exploited her wedding during Reeke.

Anonymous said...

Jake loves Ramona, but uses Matilda as a publicity tool.

Jake knows people want to hear he’s involved in Matilda’s life. He knew it two years ago too but he had no real need to address it. ;) As Heath Ledger’s daughter people are going to be a lot more interested in his relationship with her that the one with his niece. PR, baby.

Anonymous said...

^^^ Babbler bullshit, baby.

Anonymous said...

Why can't you stand Jake's friendship with Heath?

I could, if there was anything to stand.

Anonymous said...

12:36 PM - what else is Jake lying about? All his friends? Family? Colleagues?

Anonymous said...

I could, if there was anything to stand.

In a nutshell - Jake has friends and celebrity friends, but he couldn't be friends with Heath. Not a chance, that is impossible, could never happen. Right?

Anonymous said...

12:36 PM - what else is Jake lying about? All his friends? Family? Colleagues?

Don’t do that, try to test my beliefs. People don’t care that much about Jake’s family or civilian friends. Everyone was waiting to see what Jake had to say about Heath and his death. I wish I believed what he said in GQ was genuine but I’m afraid I don’t. Just like the rest of the PR sanctioned interview.

Anonymous said...

In a nutshell - Jake has friends and celebrity friends, but he couldn't be friends with Heath. Not a chance, that is impossible, could never happen. Right?

You’re talking as if I stopped them from being friends.

Anonymous said...

12:47 PM

Please stop avoiding the answer - why Jake couldn't be Heath's friend?

Anonymous said...

You’re talking as if I stopped them from being friends.

Please explain why Jake couldn't be Heath's friend, I'd really like to know.

Anonymous said...

Please stop avoiding the answer - why Jake couldn't be Heath's friend?

You’ll have to ask Jake that. Different personalities, different interests, different coasts, different circles, too busy, Heath had a baby, etcetc, take your pick.

Anonymous said...

1:00 PM - no need to ask Jake anything, Jake said that Heath was his good friend.

Why do YOU think that Jake and Heath could never be friends?

Anonymous said...

Different personalities, different interests, different coasts, different circles, too busy, Heath had a baby, etcetc, take your pick.

Lame attempts.

Anonymous said...

Very few people would be that coldblooded, to use a child whose father had died to promote themselves. That's why I believe that Jake is sincere in his comments about Heath and Matilda.

Anonymous said...

different personalities - what that has to do with anything?
different interests - we are talking about two ACTORS
different coasts - same coast, Jake likes NYC, Heath visited LA for business
different circles - they were friends, not all their friends need to be friends too + remember Michael Stipe glasses?
too busy - not true
Heath had a baby - so?

Anonymous said...

There are people who have a problem with Jake and Heath since BBMt days. I have no idea what is wrong with them, but it looks like they will continue to make up reasons why Heath can only be Jake's costar.

Trying to Make Nice to Jake Now Ted said...

Dear Ted:
I'm sorry, but anyone who claims that an out of the closet gay male cannot be a believable leading man has obviously never watched How I Met Your Mother. Neil Patrick Harris is phenomenal in the role of Barney! I swoon over him every week.
—BB

Dear Gets It:
I'm sure the Newsweek writer is super open-minded, but just doesn't have a TV.


Dear Ted:
I've been reading a lot about the backlash the appalling Newsweek article by Ramin Setoodeh has had on the gay community, but it has come to my attention that most people have failed to see how ridiculous the article is, considering Mr. Setoodeh contradicts himself in the first place. His statement of gay men who are already out of the closet not being able to be "believable" when portraying straight, is completely contradicting to his other statement about how gay men should stay in the closet if they want to successfully portray nongay characters. So which one is it, then? If gay men, according to this bigot of a man, can't successfully play straight roles, what difference does it make whether they are in or out of the closet? The only thing that changes is the perception of a particular, ignorant, biased viewer, in this case, Mr. Setoodeh.
—Copeto

Dear Go Girlfriend:
And you're not writing for Newsweek because...


Dear Ted:
I read that you said that you like Ryan Phillippe. Same here, although I haven't actually met him. What I like, besides that he is hotter than hell and a very good actor, is his attitude. Did you read his interview in Advocate? He revealed that he went to SXSW film festival to premiere MacGruber with his best gay friend and that they ended the evening in a gay bar. He calls his gay fans much cooler than his straight fans because no one there made a big deal or reported it to the press. When asked what he would have done if the gossips had gotten a hold of that info, he replies, "Who cares in this day and age?" What a cool dude.
—Patricia

Dear Friend of the Gays:
I'm sure Newsweek would have adored getting hold of that info. And I wonder if Reese is as open-minded? I would say yes.


Dear Ted:
As far as I know, Jake Gyllenhaal has never spoken publicly about Heath Ledger (nor does he need to), but since they were close friends, I wonder what affect Heath's death had on him and how's it's impacting his professional (can you imagine Heath in a Prince of Persia?) or personal life. Thoughts?
—Jas

Dear Yes and No:
Jake has talked about it a little bit in the media, basically what a hard time it was on him (rightfully so). Check out his GQ issue. I think Jake would have done Persia even if Heath were alive.


Dear Ted:
A quick point to defend Jake Gyllenhaal on the Jonathan Ross show in the U.K. I don't know if you know Jonathan Ross over there in the U.S., but over here, he's a real TV personality who can be a great interviewer—he banters and has fun with his guests and it can be a laugh. But with both Adam Lambert and Jake Gyllenhaal, he was embarrassing. He had obviously done very little research on either Lambert or Gyllenhaal, so the interviews had an awkward, repetitious quality. And frankly, if Jonathan Ross threatened to kiss me, I'd feel like gagging, too. So I don't know about the rest of J.G.'s press tour for Prince of Persia, but on Jonathan Ross, at least, I understand why he might have been a bit uncomfortable. (And he retaliated with J.R.'s iPad at the end of the show—I approve!) There was no way J.G. was going to relax with a massive summer blockbuster riding on his shoulders. Let's give the guy time.
—Anna

Dear Point Taken:
I really do heart my Jake, trust. I'm sure there are plenty of other things on his mind right now, too.

Bitch Back

Anonymous said...

I'm sure there are plenty of other things on his mind right now, too.

What other things? :)

Anonymous said...

Jake said that Heath was his good friend.

Of course he did. During BBM promo and PoP promo...

Anonymous said...

different personalities - what that has to do with anything?
different interests - we are talking about two ACTORS
different coasts - same coast, Jake likes NYC, Heath visited LA for business
different circles - they were friends, not all their friends need to be friends too + remember Michael Stipe glasses?
too busy - not true
Heath had a baby - so?


So much grasping at straws it’s embarrassing. Michael Stipe’s glasses and the black sweater, LOL forever. How sad is it to cling to this stuff?

Anonymous said...

1:52 PM,

how stupid and sad is it that you call Jake a liar just because you don't like Heath and Jake's friendship with Heath?

Anonymous said...

What do you expect from babblers who pretend that Austin doesn't exist?

Anonymous said...

Sei_ting: oh how lovely Jake Gyllenhaal was on Studio Five Live.
6 minutes ago

Joe said...

Jake Gyllenhaal is hoping to score a touchdown with studio bosses and receive the green light to play American football legend Joe Namath in a big screen biopic.

The Brokeback Mountain star has revealed he is trying to get a screenplay about the life of the New York Jets icon off the ground - and insists it would be a "dream" to play the sports hero.

He says, "I would love to play Joe Namath. I’ve been working on it for a long time, trying to develop that story. We got to get it right, got to get the extraordinary story perfect if we’re going to do it. But it would be a dream to play him.”

But the movie may interfere with the actor's own team loyalties - he has a tattoo of his favourite football team, the Pittsburgh Steelers, on his back.

http://www.imdb.com/news/ni2428186/

Anonymous said...

how stupid and sad is it that you call Jake a liar just because you don't like Heath and Jake's friendship with Heath?

Why is it okay to call Jake a liar when he lies about his sexuality but not okay when he lies about Heath?

Why should I believe Jake when he says they were friends (it didn't look like it when Heath was alive) but don’t believe him when he says he’s not gay? (I’m a JiG believer, not a babbler so spare me the childish name calling)

Hello, hypocrisy!

Jake obviously has no problem lying when it’s in his interest. Catering to the public is what he does and that’s what the GQ article is, all of it.

I have nothing against Heath, I like him fine.

Anonymous said...

I eat my own shit

Anonymous said...

What do you expect from babblers who pretend that Austin doesn't exist?

Maybe it's an obsessed babbler or and obsessed Jaustinite. Take your pick!

Anonymous said...

2:36 - Heath said they were friends too and that was after BBM promo. So, he's a liar too then, right?

Jake Didn't Make it to the Final Eight said...


Who's the Last Real Man in Hollywood? Round 4!


Behold! The elite eight who have made it to the fourth round of our Last Real Man in Hollywood tournament.

If you look at the above deelish faces closely enough, you'll notice a familiar mug is back in the running that had been wrongfully absent the last two rounds.

Yes, we performed an Awful Save and brought back one hunkmuffin' who clearly should have made it past the first round...

Please welcome Iron Man himself, Robert Downey Jr. back to the game!

Robbie's good looks alone should have been a pass to get him to the heart of our tournament, but if that doesn't do it for you, the fact his flick had the fifth largest box office opening of all time last weekend proves that RDJ should definitely be a contender to win our version of manliest catch.

Plus, you all have been emailing and twittering like crazy, begging him to be put back in, so, violà! Downey Jr. will be replacing Clive Owen, who, as much as it pains us to say, beat Ryan Gosling but who received the fewest votes overall.

If any of you strongly object that Robby's back, we promise, this is the final list of guys. No more fooling around.

Oh, and here's a little piece of info for Team Edward: Robert Pattinson barely beat Christian Bale. Seriously. Can you friggin' believe that one? Shocker.

Our hot-stuff R.Pattz only got 52 percent of the votes against Batman. What do you think of that? But the man to beat still seems to be Johnny Depp—though we're not so sure that's going to actually happen. Just an Awful hunch.

Vote wisely!

The Final Four will be revealed on Monday.

Last Real Man—Round Four!
Thanks for playing!Check back Monday, May 17 and see if your guy makes it to the Final Four

Game 4.1
Robert Pattinson
Hugh Jackman
Game 4.2
Johnny Depp
Ryan Reynolds
Game 4.3
Matt Damon
Leonardo DiCaprio
Game 4.4
Robert Downey Jr.
George Clooney

Anonymous said...

Very few people would be that coldblooded, to use a child whose father had died to promote themselves.

Jake hae no problem using Reese's children, who had just gone through a divorce (which psychologists say can be one of the most traumatic things to happen to children) to play straight stepdad.

Personally I think one of the reasons Jake is talking about Heath, Ramona, etc. is that beyond his work, he has nothing in his personal life he can talk about with interviewers.

Anonymous said...

Who's the Last Real Man in Hollywood? Round 4!

Wait a minute! Where is Jake?!

Anonymous said...

3:03 PM #2,

you idiot, Reese the bitchy mother used her kids for photo ops and showmance publicity.

Anne's bf said...

ANNE Hathaway’s actor boyfriend has come to his senses.

Adam Shulman — who the Devil Wears Prada actress has been dating for several months – swiped a mural from a Manhattan, New York, construction site in broad daylight on Saturday.

But according to New York Post gossip column Page Six, Adam on Tuesday thought better of his actions, phoned the owner, apologized and returned the artwork.

“I got my art back. I’m happy,” said owner Ken Hart, president of H&H Builders, who’s not pressing charges.

Hart’s construction company is renovating a building at 13th Street and Ninth Avenue, where Shulman ripped off the mural, painted on a plywood fence by street artist Mr. Brainwash, whose real name is Thierry Guetta.

Anne’s former flame, Raffaello Follieri, is currently serving time for a scam that netted millions from unsuspecting investors who thought he had lucrative connections to the Vatican.

Reports last year claimed Adam was planning to propose to Anne and had been eying up pricey engagement rings at a Tiffany & Co. store in lower Manhattan, New York.

“He knows Anne loves Tiffany’s, so he’s working with the store to get the best ring in his price range,” a source said in November.

Shulman, the source said, was looking to spend around $10,000: “Adam does worry about the money issue, but he really loves Anne and believes they’re meant to be together.”


showbizspy

Anonymous said...

Personally I think one of the reasons Jake is talking about Heath, Ramona, etc. is that beyond his work, he has nothing in his personal life he can talk about with interviewers.

He talks about them because he has nothing else to talk about? What an honor, lol.

Anonymous said...

I like Anne, but it was said that much of the money Follieri stole he bought her gifts for etc. I think Anne is very high maintenance. She can't really extpect that zero Shulman can afford buying her expensive jewelry. If she wants someone who can match her in life style...date a really rich guy! She's Anne Hathaway. I bet many older, rich guys would be more than happy to spend millions and millions for her.

Anonymous said...

What's this, I Hate Jake day?

Anonymous said...

What's this, I Hate Jake day?

No, it's just the 1 or 2 usual posters who are beyond pissed that Jake doesn't come out of the closet and can't see anything good in him beyond that.

Anonymous said...

He talks about them because he has nothing else to talk about?

No, Jake talks about them because they are important to him.

Anonymous said...

Who's the Last Real Man in Hollywood? Round 4!
Wait a minute! Where is Jake?!


See the lead in:
Jake Didn't Make it to the Final Eight said...

I'm not sure who he was paired up against the last time - at one point it was between him and Zac Efron :)

Jake Gyllenhaal Channels John McEnroe For Vampire Weekend Video said...

'I basically changed into a tennis outfit, and I got down,' he tells MTV News of 'Giving Up the Gun' cameo.

Vampire Weekend's "Giving Up the Gun" video is a smorgasbord of thoroughly WTF cameos — everyone from Joe Jonas to Lil Jon shows up at one point or another — but perhaps no guest star is as perplexing as Jake Gyllenhaal. After all, with a relatively huge summer movie to promote (the swords-n-sandals epic "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time"), you'd think he'd have better things to do with his time.

Turns out, nothing could be further from the truth.

"That was just amazing, because I love that band, and I love their first album, and I had recently just got their second album," Gyllenhaal told MTV News. "I got a call from the directors, who are friends of mine ... and they were like, 'We're doing this thing, and we heard you're a big fan of the band. We didn't know if you wanted to come down.' I was actually in San Francisco, and they were shooting it in Los Angeles, and they were like, 'We're shooting it this evening,' so I said, 'All right, I'm there.' So I drove down from San Francisco to this soundstage in downtown L.A., and I basically changed into a tennis outfit, and I got down."

In the clip, Gyllenhaal plays a hard-swinging, even harder-boozing tennis pro, a role that, surprisingly, wasn't that much of a stretch for the Oscar-nominated actor.

"Well, that's the only way anyone's going to beat me, if I'm that wasted," he joked. "They call me, like, the John McEnroe of action films."

And though, yes, he does have a film to promote, Gyllenhaal said he'd drop everything if the guys from Vampire Weekend came calling again. Just as long as "Gun" co-stars Jonas, Jon and the RZA are involved. After all, he's old pals with all of them.

"It was really fun. I met the band and hung out with them. They're all really cool guys ... and the Jonas Brothers, the RZA and Lil Jon, we all usually chill anyway," he laughed. "Actually, we were up in San Francisco, and I was like, 'You guys, do you want to come down with me?' And Lil Jon was like, 'I'm busy,' and I was like, 'Come on, man, get in the car!' So we all chilled out, listened to the whole album, and the RZA was dope. He was great. He sat shotgun, because that's where he likes to sit usually. ... We all hang out because we're all really good friends."

Jake Gyllenhaal Talks About Vampire Weekend Video + video

Anonymous said...

See the lead in:
Jake Didn't Make it to the Final Eight


Oh, that... I didn't see that small print, lol!

Anonymous said...

... and I got down,'

we all usually chill anyway,"

So we all chilled out, listened to the whole album, and the RZA was dope


LOL at Rapper Slang!Jake.

Anonymous said...

So what was Jake during in San Francisco?

Seems kind of strange to drive down too, wouldn't that take 6 or 7hours?

Anonymous said...

They're all really cool guys ... and the Jonas Brothers, the RZA and Lil Jon, we all usually chill anyway," he laughed. "Actually, we were up in San Francisco, and I was like, 'You guys, do you want to come down with me?' And Lil Jon was like, 'I'm busy,' and I was like, 'Come on, man, get in the car!'

Lil Jon part - joke or real?

Anonymous said...

A scathing imdb review of PoP:

Have you ever watched a film so horrible that you simply could not reconcile its atrociousness with its glowing IMDb rating? I had this experience after watching Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time earlier today. The IMDb reviews were raving harder than a teenager after midnight – with terms like "masterpiece" being thrown around, apparently on a whim. I was expecting this film to be pretty good. Nothing prepared me for the absolute disaster I was about to see.

Where to begin? Let's start with the single worst aspect of Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time – the acting. I'm not exaggerating when I say that the acting consists of some of the most systematically awful performances I've seen in any movie . . . ever. A typical bad film will have various moments of deficient acting, but Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time is systematically deficient, meaning that there are extremely long periods of time where just about everyone on screen is stinking the place out. For example, the film is basically a 116-minute trainwreck that is the epitome of quintessential artificiality. The centerpiece of which is perhaps the scene with the lead character falling awkwardly after someone disappears near the river. But there are so many badly-acted moments that it would require booklength treatment to cover it all. However, the viewer should look forward to the food poisoning scene, which makes a Sci-Fi Channel Original Film look Oscar worthy.

What else is wrong with Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time? Everything – storyline, character development, etc. – can be summarily described as unintentionally hilarious.

Cheap, ineffective scares and downright stupid deaths are used. One such scene occurs midway thru when two people trip on a rope bridge. The movie then cuts to their stunt-dummies falling onto some hard rocks below. It was probably meant to be horrifying, but it came off as exceedingly funny. The character who teams up with a rival princess to stop an angry ruler from unleashing a sandstorm that could destroy the world, was so damn slow that it was reminiscent of Austin Powers when the steamroller was slowly approaching the screaming baddie from fifty yards away. The subsequent efforts by the Prince to save his own kingdom and redeem his fatal mistake was also stupifying. Perhaps the funniest series of deaths take place during the punishment of random dudes in hell. Just look for the dude who gets "flayed", which will undoubtedly have the viewer rolling hysterically.

At one point the movie shows extreme closeups of random people screaming at the camera, which gets very annoying.

The finale has the lead character run in ultra cheesy fashion (in slow-motion) after his baby, which is strapped onto a big, turning wheel. I saw the baby on the wheel the first time, but the filmmakers inexplicably found it necessary to repeat the same exact scene over a dozen times. Imagine a 3-second scene being repeated over and over and over again every few seconds. It's almost as if the filmmakers weren't so much intending on depicting hell as they were attempting to INFLICT hell on the viewer with this pathetic attempt at film-making.

To supplement the horrible finale with the spinning baby, the lead character jumps in an attempt to save the child, but mis-times it so badly that he ends up on the OPPOSITE SIDE of the giant wheel. I knew this guy was stupid, but it doesn't get any more moronic than that.

Some family friendly gore and a few scenes with fantastic imagery could have saved this one from the cinema sewer, but everything else is of such an unbelievably low quality that this film easily steamrolls to the bottom of the barrel.

Anonymous said...

Another great (not) review from imdb:

went to watch the world premier of the new Jerry Bruckheimer summer "blockbuster" - prince of Persia The sand of time yesterday at Starcity in Birmingham UK.

Some spoilers below.

All I can say is what a load of rubbish ! I was so let down by the film. The acting by all in the film (including Jake Gyllenhaal, Gemma Arterton & Ben Kingsley) was really really bad - at times I thought I was watching a comedy sketch making fun of bad actors. The comedic part of the film played by Alfred Molina was terrible - the jokes just did not work.

The special effects (as you would imagine) were great and some of the fight sequences were good - but there was no plot - except everyone fight to location 2 then to location 3 then back to location 1.... really bad.

No one cared who died or lived in the film - both brothers (Toby Kebbell, Richard Coyleand) and father (Ronald Pickup) did nothing to support Jake Gyllenhaal - which I think really showed in the overall film. These character really needed to help support the main character to give depth, but this was just not the case.

And Ben Kingsley as the main "bad guy" was soooo bad. They really did not build his character up as evil at all - one small act does not make a terrifying foe for the hero of a film.

Although I got free tickets for this event (thank you sky . com) - I was totally let down by the film. Really really disappointed.

Anonymous said...

And there are loads of others....

PoP review said...

I promised myself I wouldn’t cry during POP:TSOT, if only because I expected to be mourning the death of another excellent gaming franchise at the hands of blundering Hollywood executives, headed up by super producer Jerry Bruckheimer. The result was arguably one of the best videogame-to-film adaptations ever. But that is like saying that Jedward are the best novelty pop act to come out of Ireland. Or that Gordon Ramsey is the most attractive TV chef. The competition is pretty minimal.
...
Many people will be perfectly satisfied with what Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time has to offer. Its undemanding stuff, and some of the action sequences are well choreographed and vaguely reminiscent of the games upon which this film is based. But as a package it’s just a bit too dull, and Iron Man 2 is still the best summer blockbuster around this year.

the collective review

Anonymous said...

Seems kind of strange to drive down too, wouldn't that take 6 or 7hours?

Not too long if Lil Jon is there to keep you company ;)

PoP interview said...

A very cute beginning and end :)

Jake Gyllenhaal sits with Talking Pictures' Tony Toscano

Anonymous said...

Why are people mad at Jake for the interview?

She brought up Matilda and he never said her name or anything about her other that it was an honor. He said nothing about his niece except saying yes he had one.

The part people aren’t mentioning was when she asked about having his own kid he says something about when WE have one.

No BT. But who is the WE?

Anonymous said...

he says something about when WE have one

Really? I have to watch that again :)

Anonymous said...

Why are people mad at Jake for the interview?

Because some people can't stand the idea of Jake caring about Heath or his daughter. I have no idea what's wrong with them.

Anonymous said...

But who is the WE?

Probably his future partner and him.

Anonymous said...

Jake said "if we ever do it, if I'm lucky enough to have a child".
What did he mean with "if we ever do it"?

5:55 PM said...

Yes, Jake did say "we" - I hear words but I can't figure out the sentence.

GMTV video @ 04:50

5:55 PM said...

Thanks 6:05 PM!

Kagan is Trash said...

10:59 am - How much time do you have? It'll take approx. six years to explain everything.

Anonymous said...

What did he mean with "if we ever do it"?

Use surrogate mother?

Anonymous said...

Thanks 6:05 PM!

No prob.

Anonymous said...

Use surrogate mother?

"Gay Jake" could mean that, yeah.

"Straigh/bi Jake" maybe has a woman on his mind that he wants to do and impregnate. LOL.

Honestly, I've no idea what he meant. Probably means nothing anyway.

Anonymous said...

Honestly, I've no idea what he meant. Probably means nothing anyway.

I don't know what he meant either, but it's odd phrasing for a single guy. And I'm not saying that just because it's Jake - it would seem odd to me for any single guy.

Anonymous said...

Jake said "if we ever do it, if I'm lucky enough to have a child".

But if he means "we ever do it" (I'm not even sure he says that, it's not clear to me) as in he and his partner why then say "if I'm lucky enough to have a child"? Wouldn't it be "we" too?

Anonymous said...

But if he means "we ever do it" (I'm not even sure he says that, it's not clear to me) as in he and his partner why then say "if I'm lucky enough to have a child"? Wouldn't it be "we" too?

Sigh. Who knows what he meant? I think it's of no significance.

Anonymous said...

I think it's of no significance.

I agree. Or maybe he has a surrogate in mind but as a single parent, that's the only thing I can think of that would explain his strange use of "we" and "I" in that context.

Anonymous said...

Jake probably caught himself and changed it to I, or his publicist shot him a dirty look. Babbling again when caught off guard.

Kagan Is Trash said...

"Honestly, I've no idea what he meant. Probably means nothing anyway."

I think that this freudian slip is highly significant.

"Personally I think one of the reasons Jake is talking about Heath, Ramona, etc. is that beyond his work, he has nothing in his personal life he can talk about with interviewers."

ITA.

Anonymous said...

I'm glad someone else saw it the way I did. Jake did not bring up Matilda or say anything about her, except that it is an honor to be a godfather. The interviewer filled in the blanks herself. That seems to happen a lot in Jake's interviews because he withholds the details.

Jake and Austin mixed their sperm for the surrogate, so Baby Tile could genetically be Austin's, not his. So Jake still wants a child of his own. Therefore the use of if we ever do it. He probably meant do it again.

Anonymous said...

Its never a good sign when a studio puts on a moratorium on reviews. If the film is good, they want them out there. If its not, they want them withheld so they can get what box office they can before word gets out. I'm surprised there are not more twitters about the movie.

Anonymous said...

"What did he mean with "if WE ever do it"?"

WE= Jake and Austin.

"Jake probably caught himself and changed it to I, or his publicist shot him a dirty look. Babbling again when caught off guard."

I agree.

Anonymous said...

Jake and Austin mixed their sperm for the surrogate, so Baby Tile could genetically be Austin's, not his.

I hope they didn't do that, I can't imagine Jake and Austin still being together.

LAX said...

erialcgrove: And my brief moment of starspotting - Jake Gyllenhaal was right m front of me in the ever tedious customs queue at LAX. Dude had 10 cases!
20 minutes ago

that's a lot of cocks! said...

According to Life & Style (May 24, 2010), James Franco's student film at NYU is characterized by its clown and dog masks as well as "shots of male genitalia urinating." I can't wait to see his first feature, and I hope he pulls a Hitchcock in it!

James is a Regular Cock-Teau - scan

Anonymous said...

Right now, Megan Fox and Lindsay Lohan are bitch-slapping their agents RAW!

Two biopics are in development about the famed blonde Marilyn Monroe, according to reports out of Cannes.

The first will be an adaptation starring Naomi Watts as Marilyn. The flick will be taken from Joyce Carol Oates' imaginary memoir Blonde.

At the same time, Weinstein Co. is set to be distributing My Week With Marilyn, a movie about the filming of The Prince and the Showgirl where Marilyn played opposite Laurence Olivier. Playing Monroe will be Dawson's Creek blondie Michelle Williams.

An exciting role for each of them to play.

Who do U think will play her better?



Perez

Anonymous said...

^^Scar Jo would have been a good choice to play MM in one of the films.

Naomi has no boobs, Michelle has no butt.

I wonder who Heath would have prefered in the role? ;)

Anonymous said...

I wonder who Heath would have prefered in the role? ;)

I don't know but I think he would have had a laugh, two of his exes to play the same woman. The irony.

Anonymous said...

I don't know but I think he would have had a laugh, two of his exes to play the same woman. The irony.

LOL. True. ;)

Anonymous said...

What did he mean with "if WE ever do it"?

I think he meant if they (he and Lorraine) ever do an interview (I think he forgot "again") and if he has a child, he'll say "that's my biggest production ever". That's how I understand it.

Anonymous said...

Who would think that a Lorraine Kelly interview could create such discussion and dissection. Maybe its just that Jake really is beginning to believe the PoP hype and has started to use the royal 'we'.

Also, don't you think Ricky Martin looks absolutely great.

James Franco's PR team said...

We want a raise or we're going to quit!

Anonymous said...

Naomi Watts and Michelle Williams -life writes incredible stories :)

Anonymous said...

Maybe its just that Jake really is beginning to believe the PoP hype and has started to use the royal 'we'.

Bad fan! :)

Interviews With Jake Gyllenhaal And Gemma Arterton said...

We talk to Jake Gyllenhaal and Gemma Arterton about the making of new movie 'Prince Of Persia: The Sands Of Time', plus Arterton's history of being in "dodgy bands" and whether Gyllenhaal could play Kurt Cobain.

nme.com

James Franco's NYU Thesis Project Contains Shocking Amount Of Male Nudity, Men Peeing: Life and Style said...

Omnipresent New Yorker James Franco is receiving terrible reviews -- for his thesis.

The NYU/Columbia/Yale student showed his film project at NYU recently, and according to a Life & Style source, "It pretty much had no plot and featured men in clown masks, men in dog masks, and shots of male genitalia urinating. I think everyone was shocked by how much male nudity there was."

Franco recently did a film interview with artist Marina Abramovic that seemed to go over much better.

Huffington Post

Jake said...

I love Life and Style with Shocking Amount Of Male Nudity!

Ted said...

Dear Ted:
Have you seen this vid? I don't know on what part I should comment first, Jake's very "unique" way to move on the dance-floor, his special way to make moves on these ladies, or the fact that "someone" (let's pretend it's not his publicist) recorded it in a probably very private party. What do you think?
—Audrey

Dear Dancing Diva:
Hate to say it, but I thought Jake's moves (whether booze-fuelled or not) were adorable. Can't hate the guy for having fun, right? Plus, now we know if this acting thing doesn't work out, he can always pop up on Dancing With The Stars.


Dear Ted:
Can you please give me a hint on James Franco's Blind Vice? He is such a great actor and super hot! Thanks a bunch, love ya!
—Sandy

Dear Being Franc:
Let's just say one of J.F.'s Vicey qualities is how tedious he is. Deliciously so, of course.


Dear Ted:
I got so excited when I saw that Robert Downey Jr. has a BV! I just love him and I can't help but wonder if his BV has anything to do with his wife. Or is she really an angel like he says she is?
—Theo

Dear Duh:
You were really shocked RDJ had a BV, even after all the dirt we've found out about him? Really? And let's just say the wife knows of her man's stuff, though it hardly involves her—at least, not directly.


Dear Ted:
I just want to go on record regarding this Newsweek brouhaha, and I responded when I first read it on Twitter: Sexy is Sexy is Sexy. Talented is Talented is Talented. I'm a straight woman, and I knew Jonathon Groff was gay. Did not care! He's so smoking hot, such an amazing singer and I melt when he's on screen. Seriously, so many women I know could care less about someone's sexual orientation, and more about who they are as a person. That article was deplorable for a lot of reasons; although it did bring to light what you say here all the time about why stars stay in the closet to keep up their marketability, which is just sad.
—E

Dear Well Said:
Agreed, E—both on the not caring part and thinking Groff is totally sexy.

Bitch-Back! Angie vs. Lea—Who's the True Diva?

Anonymous said...

And let's just say the wife knows of her man's stuff, though it hardly involves her—at least, not directly.

Drugs or men?

blogger doesn't like me said...

Where did my 'Ricky is great!' post go?! Anyway, the more I learn about Ricky, the more I like him :)

Anonymous said...

(((((Ted))))) He always says what he thinks. I thought Jake was adorable in that vid too. :)

I expect we'll get a negative jab from Xenophobe the Warrior Princess any second now, for saying anything positive about Jake, in any way. :)

kind of OT said...

Jake Gyllenhaal struggled to fake a British accent. The American actor, who plays the role of Prince Dastan in new movie "Prince of Persia: Sands of Time", admitted getting into shape might have been tough, but faking the British accent was even more demanding. "The accent definitely. It's daunting trying to do any kind of service as an American to such a beautiful, fluid speech pattern that you all have," he told BANG Showbiz. "We are just barbarians in comparison."

The New Zealander (Russell Crowe) was being quizzed on Radio 4 about his dodgy Sherwood Forest accent when he lost his rag and yelled: "B****cks!"

Cursing Crowe, 46, flipped when interviewer MARK LAWSON suggested "hints" of Irish in his portrayal of the Nottingham legend - and asked the Hollywood hellraiser why. The actor snarled before flouncing off: "No I was going for an Italian... missed it? F*** me."

Crowe has seethed since critics at the Cannes premiere of Robin Hood slated his lilt.

The Sun

cousin said...

Just saw a pic of my cousin (Jake Gyllenhaal) at a premier. SO FREAKY to see his pic because he looks so much like my other cousin, Blair!
3 minutes ago

Name: Merry Farmer
Location: Philadelphia, PA (Horsham)
Bio: Novelist, Director, Wannabe Subtitle Writer, Cricket Chick ... Making friends online since 1997!

http://twitter.com/Phrygiana

Anonymous said...

Dodgy for Russell Crowe's accent? I still remember Kevin Costner's SoCa accent. It's one of those stories like King Arthur that I could see 1000 time in 1000 different ways. I'm looking forward to Robin Hood, I think Crowe will be fantastic in it, the perfect choice. He's got a short fuse, doesn't he. :)

Anonymous said...

He's got a big, dirty mouth :)

Anonymous said...

:)

Anonymous said...

The poor interviewer didn't mean any harm, I'm glad there's hints of Irish in Russell's accent. There's no way to know exactly what it was like anyway, he's a mythological character, much like Dastan, except we sure know Robin wasn't from CA. :)

Kevin said...

*sulks*

Anonymous said...

(((((Ted))))) He always says what he thinks.

Well, as Ted said yesterday, when it comes down to it, he really does heart his Jake :) And that's why it cracks me up when babblers and the like insist that Ted hates him, lol. It'll be interesting to see what Ted says about PoP after he actually sees it.

Anonymous said...

^^He does, I always have thought that Ted hearts Jake.

Kevin, you were still great in Robin Hood. :)

Anonymous said...

And you were fantastic in The Untouchables *sigh*

Anonymous said...

^^Oh God, was he ever. :)

Anonymous said...

As long as Jake manages not to sound like Dick Van Dyke in Mary Poppins I think he'll be okay.

Russell Crowe is a different matter, and isn't he just a bit too old to be prancing around Sherwood Forest with his merry band of men.

(btw. 9:09 Robin Hood is most likely based on a real person, and Dastan is NOT a mythical person but a character developed by software designers to sell a computer game. I'm sure Prince of Persia is going to be fun, but lets not confuse it with Iliad)

Anonymous said...

Well they had to age sometime - I think it an interesting take instead of having them in a state of suspended animation of perpetual youthfulness - it's a little more real.

RH is most likely based on a real person, which means there's no way to know, but over the centuries he has become larger than life, so he he has changed from whoever he may have been based on centuries ago, and mythologized, and isn't real. Not the same, but similar to Dastan, who knows who he was inspired by.

Anonymous said...

Dastan was probably inspired by the findings of a focus group.

OT, but hilarious said...

I should be working, but I just spent five minutes lmao irl at this (although I agree with all the commenters who pointed out that Adam's cover was purposely campy - he wasn't going for sexy). And if there was anyone out there that still doubted whether Travolta was gay, this should settle it :) Some commenters have added their fave covers, lol.

The 19 Most Hilariously Failed Attempts at Sexy Album Covers

Anonymous said...

^^^ Awww, Travota and Tino are so cute :)

Anonymous said...

I have always loved Prince's too. :)

Anonymous said...

Adam has Destiny's seal of approval. :)

Anonymous said...

The 19 Most Hilariously Failed Attempts at Sexy Album Covers

Superman

Anonymous said...

Prince is very sexy. :)

Anonymous said...

This Prince?

Anonymous said...

Something for Atticus!

Anonymous said...

Superman

LOL. I love the subtitle, "Every Night and Every Day." And what's the deal with the dune buggy thing?

Anonymous said...

I think he meant if they (he and Lorraine) ever do an interview (I think he forgot "again") and if he has a child, he'll say "that's my biggest production ever". That's how I understand it.

Yeah, I just watched it again and I think you're right. They were kind of talking over each other, but I think that's what he was responding to with the "we." No slip of the tongue or hidden meaning. Move along, people. Nothing to see here :)

Anonymous said...

10:42.. killjoy :(

I say stick with slip of the tongue and endlessly fascinating hidden meanings.

Anonymous said...

I'm with 10:45 AM :)

Anonymous said...

^^^ silly trolly

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

What's a sheeple?

Anonymous said...

Sheeple - People unable to think for themselves. Followers. Lemmings. Those with no cognitive ablilities of their own. Example - Jake Gyllenhaal fangirls, often called babblers.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 400 of 2794   Newer› Newest»