Wednesday, 24 June 2009

I Dish, Therefore I Am


On March 10, 2005, gossip columnist Ted Casablanca ran an item online under the heading "One Adorable Blind Vice".

The story was similar to numerous blind items Casablanca has run since bringing his column, "The Awful Truth," to E! Online in 1996. He relates a potentially scandalous story, usually with the kinds of revelations a major media gossip columnist would avoid, but disguises the object of his gossip behind a fanciful name like Morgan Mayhem, Furrowed Frank or Toothy Tile.

The ongoing saga of Toothy Tile says a good deal about Internet gossip, its place within the gay community and its function as a moral compass. It also points to some interesting intersections of gossip and gendered performance.

Hollywood gossip, of course, was around long before the Internet. Usually dated from the start of Louella Parsons' syndicated column in 1925, the field has traditionally been female-dominated, with Parsons and her chief rival, Hedda Hopper, engaged in an often-uneasy power struggle with the movie industry. The film studios used them to promote their films and personalities but also dreaded the effect of a personal attack or untimely revelation. One unwritten rule, however, was that the most damaging items — criminal arrests, long-term affairs and homosexuality — were not for publication in any but the least reputable venues. Parsons, Hopper and most of Hollywood may have known that Ramon Novarro was gay, but they weren't about to publish the fact. And if a writer broke the rules — as Bill Robinson did when he wrote about Spencer Tracy's drinking problems and his relationship with Katharine Hepburn in a 1962 issue of Look — the offender was cut off from industry sources.

Even with the decline of the studio system, some restrictions still hold. Unless a star's drug use is impossible for the media to ignore, it's kept out of the gossip columns. And "outing" is still considered off-limits, at least to columnists working in the major media.

For the gay on-line community, gossip serves a variety of purposes. If nothing else, it provides its readers with a sense of titillation as they vicariously enjoy celebrities' lives, even when the object of interest is masked behind the veil of the blind item. Like many on-line discussion boards, gay gossip sites provide their geographically dispersed users with a sense of community.

One element unifying gossip communities is a shared sense of morality. Gay gossip unites the gay and lesbian community by establishing behavioral norms for that community, creating insiders aware of those norms and outsiders unaware of or opposed to them.

In the case of Toothy Tile, the nature of those norms depends on whether one is inside or outside the gay community. Within the world of heteronormativity, Toothy Tile is at fault both for being gay and, more important, for wishing to make a public proclamation of that fact.

Despite the social changes of the past 50 years, the entertainment industry appears to be dealing with sexual orientation by the same standards in operation when Universal Pictures forced Rock Hudson to take a wife to forestall suspicions of homosexuality. The current attitude is described quite simply in one publicity-shy, or rather gay-publicity shy actor's legal complaint against a porn star who had claimed a relationship with him: "While plaintiff believes in the rights of others to follow their own sexual preference, vast numbers of the public throughout the world do not share his view and, believing that he had a homosexual affair and did so during his marriage, they will be less inclined to patronize [his] films, particularly since he tends to play parts calling for heterosexual romance and action adventure. " No doubt, these are the same audiences who would expect the actor to know how to pilot a jet fighter in real life.

Who, then, is thought to be the perpetually closeted Toothy Tile? Consensus gives the honor to Jake Gyllenhaal.

So, what team is Jake playing for? How many beards do you see in this picture? And...well, do I really have to say anything.

Source: I Dish, Therefore I Am: Performing Toothy Tile and Ted Casablanca by Frank Miller, Georgia State University

1,891 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   1001 – 1200 of 1891   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

Someone needs to go get their nasty wicked fun humor cap on, no wait we don't have sizes for that big of heads, sorry.

Anonymous said...

"What's Behind Reese's Smile?"

TEETH. Tooth and baby teeth.

Anonymous said...

Maybe I should explain. Doesn't it seem odd that Ted's Bitch Back question about Reese:

Dear Ted:
Has Reese Witherspoon ever worked with Nevis Devine?
—Jennifer

Dear Reese-spicous:
Nope. She has worked with other Blind Vice subjects...and been one herself!


Has NOTHING to do with the headline:

"What's Behind Reese's Smile?"

Sure, some would take it figuratively speaking as she's smiling because she knows about these BVs. But notice the pic of her is a closed smile. So yes, literally right behind it, is TEETH. Toothy and company.

Don't know about you guys but I hope I'm never in a war of the words bitch fight with Ted. Damn he's GOOD.

Anonymous said...

Oh, and Ted has her in 1 question, but she gets the featured picture? Why is that? And no questions or references to Toothy or even Jake. Of course, to make people look at her pic, the closed lips, to think of what's behind them: Tooth and company.

posted by lane at godot said...

Hmm I'm still thinking about Ted's answer about BT's mother, remember how he said he wasn't going to play the 3 degrees of separation? 3 degrees, not 4, not 5 not 8. And remember the first couple of sightings of Reeke/Jake 3 years ago, in doctors offices/med centers? Depending on your POV, people assumed they were practicing safe-sex and doing the pre-sex/followup AIDS tests, or gay Jake was accompanying Reese for her newly-single-and-ready-to-start-dating AIDS test, birth control, or they were doing movie physicals, whatever. There was one sighting, I think Jake alone, where there was a pregnant woman who complimented Jake saying he was very good looking and he answered/joked that she looked very pregnant? It's possible that sighting it took place at a OB office or center, right, since she was preggers.

Anyway what I'm getting at, with the early 2007 med center Reeke sightings and then Ted's cryptic "3 degrees" answer, along with their longterm bearding relationship, it's very, very possible Reese was the egg donor for BT back in late 2006, early 2007. Sometimes it takes a few tries, and with the hormone therapy sometimes the donor gains a few pounds, and remember Reese wasn't exactly a stick back then.

Oh and before you trolls come along and give the standard "You are kidding, right?", you can forget about challenging or changing my ideas, wondering thoughts, opinion, and questions. At least I have the courtesy to stick to a blog that I agree with and express myself, not go to other blogs and try to convert them.

Anonymous said...

Any woman with any sense would never allow herself to get pregnant with the child of a man she's only known for a few months.

IA. It's not very wise, she barely knew him. After BBM he was shooting 2 films back to back and during Candy shoot she got pregnant. He probably spent more time on set than with her. They were practically strangers who became parents. No wonder it fell apart so soon.

Matilda said...

Any woman with any sense would never allow herself to get pregnant with the child of a man she's only known for a few months.

Falling hard and fast in love has never made sense. Falling in love in any way has never made sense. Thank god the world doesn't always make sense!

Anonymous said...

A lot of us wouldn't be here if our parents had had any sense!

Anonymous said...

My 5 yr old son, let's call him Justin, invited his friend over to our house and Justin proudly showed him pics on his bedroom wall of himself as a toddler at Mommy and Daddy's wedding. I heard later from the friend's mom that her boy came home and asked where he was when they got married, he was kind of upset like why wasn't he invited? lol.

A pregnancy might be planned or not but after that all bets are off the table. Because you can never plan for anything that child does or says. And in the end its all wonderful, even the embarassing shit!

Anonymous said...

he was kind of upset like why wasn't he invited

LOL!

old, bad jokes said...

June 26th 2009

Jeff Goldblum, Harrison Ford dead? Fake news stories make dire claims

Reports of Jeff Goldblum's and Harrison Ford's deaths are grossly exaggerated.

As the nation was hit with not one, but two tragic celebrity deaths on Thursday - Farrah Fawcett and Michael Jackson - the Internet seemed to suggest two more Hollywood demises had occurred that same day: "Jurassic Park" actor Goldblum and "Indiana Jones" himself, Harrison Ford.

The rumors of Goldblum and Ford's untimely deaths turned out to be false, and were in fact well-known Internet pranks that once made similar claims of Tom Hanks and Tom Cruise.

NY Daily News

Anonymous said...

Any woman with any sense would never allow herself to get pregnant with the child of a man she's only known for a few months.

What if Heath was the first man who made her want a kid and it was "who knows if I'll ever meet someone else who will make me feel like this" moment?

Anonymous said...

What if Heath was the first man who made her want a kid and it was "who knows if I'll ever meet someone else who will make me feel like this" moment?

I do think she thought he was perfect daddy material. And he loved kids a lot. But in the end I don't think he was really ready for it.

Anonymous said...

Jake's Award

Jake Gyllenhaal Shatters Masturbation World Record!

It's official, Jake Gyllenhaal is the new king of masturbation. In a stunning feat of endurance and determination, Jake Gyllenhaal achieved 36 orgasms in a 24 hour period!

Sleeping intermittently during the 24 hour marathon, Jake Gyllenhaal remained focused and aroused by his impressive library of pornographic films. With over 400 films in his library and 3 televisions playing movies at all times, he had a continuous stream of footage to aid him in his quest.

It is apparent by the massive development of the muscles in his forearm that Jake Gyllenhaal is not your average masturbator. In an interview with UJ reporters after the record setting event, Jake Gyllenhaal was quoted as saying, "masturbation for me is a way of life. I've been training for this day since I was 13 years old and I'm happy with my performance today".

This record was formerly held by German Student, Hans Blickstein who achieved 27 orgasms in a 24 hour period. Mr. Blickstein was not available for comment.

When asked what his next world record achievement would be, Jake Gyllenhaal said "my immediate goal is to get a bag of ice and some lotion on my penis to soothe the burning".

http://jake.gyllenhaal.mediafetcher.com/news/top_stories/worldrecord.php

Jake said...

Jake Gyllenhaal remained focused and aroused by his impressive library of pornographic films.

Thank Moses they didn't mention details!

Austin and Sophia said...

Spoiler Chat: Will Brooke and Julian Make It on One Tree Hill?

When One Tree Hill returns in the fall, what's in store for Sophia Bush's Brooke and Austin Nichols' Julian? Will they hook up or break down? Plus, how far forward is this season's time jump?

We've got the scoop on the future of OTH and much more dish in this week's Spoiler Chat. Read on to find out:
...

E! Online

Anonymous said...

Gorgeous pictures of Heath on-line at VF. dont know if these are all in the magazine ???

I guess so. Someone will have to check and let us know :)

The August issue of Vanity Fair hits newsstands in New York and Los Angeles on July 1 and nationally July 7.

Memories of a Paris Fountain Boy said...

In a stunning feat of endurance and determination, Jake Gyllenhaal achieved 36 orgasms in a 24 hour period!

And I helped!

Jake said...

Shush! Pierre, be quiet, no one cares about the details.

Marks His Words: Gays Will 'Have Some Pretty Good Feelings' About Obama Administration said...

Jun 29, 2009

In an applause-laden speech at the White House this afternoon, President Obama laid out his most detailed committment to the gay community yet. Reiterating previous promises to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, enact federal hate crimes protections, and repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell, our great orator of a president made a fantastic case for his self-professed committment to GLBTs. With Michelle by his side, Obama reminded us of what we knew him to be as a candidate: our "ally and a champion" to our community. And equally importantly, he acknowledged our frustration.

Said Obama (rush transcript, excuse errors):

"I know that many in this room feel that progress has not come fast enough. … But I say this: We have made progress. And we will make more. And I want you to know that I expect, and hope, not to be judged by words … but by promises my administration keeps. We've been in office six months, I expect by the time this administration if over, you guys will have some pretty good feelings about the Obama administration."

ON DOMA: "we have a duty to uphold existing law, but I believe we must do so in a way that does not exacerbate old divides. And fulfilling this duty in upholding the law in no way lessens my commitment to reversing this law. I've made that clear."

ON DADT: "I believe Don't Ask Don't Tell doesn't contribute to our national security. I believe preventing patriotic Americans from serving their country weakens our national security. … Now, my administration is already working with the Pentagon and members of the House and the Senate on how we'll go about ending this policy, which will require an act of Congress. Someday, I'm confident, we'll look back at this transition and ask why it generated such angst, but as Commander-in-Chief, in a time of war, I do have a responsibility to see that this change is administered in a practical way and a way that takes over the long term."

Rep. Jared Polis reacts. Asked whether Obama is "waffling" on his commitment, Polis, arguably, waffles in his own answer: (video)

FULL TRANSCRIPT on Page 2.

FULL LIST of invited guests on Page 3.

Queerty

gay as a goose said...

FULL TRANSCRIPT on Page 2:

THE PRESIDENT: ... And yet all of you continue, leading by the force of the arguments you make but also by the power of the example that you set in your own lives — as parents and friends, as PTA members and leaders in the community. And that's important, and I'm glad that so many LGBT families could join us today. (Applause.) For we know that progress depends not only on changing laws but also changing hearts. And that real, transformative change never begins in Washington.

(Cell phone "quacks.")

Whose duck is back there? (Laughter.)

MRS. OBAMA: It's a duck.

THE PRESIDENT: There's a duck quacking in there somewhere. (Laughter.) Where do you guys get these ring tones, by the way? (Laughter.) I'm just curious. (Laughter.)


LOL!

Signed Blind Vice Handjob Guy said...

no one cares about the details.

Did you have to sign all 36 confidentiality agreements for yourself?

Jake said...

I told Austin not to call anyone who was going to that speech! Shit!

Anonymous said...

LOL!

Jake said...

Did you have to sign all 36 confidentiality agreements for yourself?

Shush!

Anonymous said...

Anyway what I'm getting at, with the early 2007 med center Reeke sightings and then Ted's cryptic "3 degrees" answer, along with their longterm bearding relationship, it's very, very possible Reese was the egg donor for BT back in late 2006, early 2007.

There weren't any Reeke sightings at the med center in the early 2007.

There was an attempt to present Jake's and Reese's separate visits (there are pictures and video) like "Reeke med center visit". A week or two after that one of the rags claimed another "Reeke med center visit" - no pictures this time, just Reeke tabloid bullshit.

Anyway, I don't see any reason why would Jake and Austin ever consider asking someone like Reese for such a favour - they have friends and they have other options.

Anonymous said...

Of course, to make people look at her pic, the closed lips, to think of what's behind them: Tooth and company.

I don't get it - what is / who is "company"?

Anonymous said...

There was an attempt to present Jake's and Reese's separate visits (there are pictures and video) like "Reeke med center visit".

P.S. If I remember correctly, an an attempt by a paparazzi agency.

Anonymous said...

Mariah has a beard :)

Mariah Carey is a Drag King

out or not? said...

Most people know Michael Urie in his role of Marc, editrix Vanessa Williams's bitchy assistant on Ugly Betty. But Urie is also an accomplished stage actor, and he's showing off his theatrical chops right now in The Temperamentals, Jon Marans's moving, often hilarious play about the Mattachine Society, a gay-male activist group born in the closeted atmosphere of the early fifties.
...

Q: In the context of this play, it's almost impossible not to ask you about your own sexuality. You've never really publicly declared it, but on your own website, you identify yourself as "a member of the LGBT community" and say that organizations that help people with HIV/AIDS or people who are LGBT are "A-Number 1 in my book!" So what's the deal?
A: Well, that's my M.O. I'm interested in keeping — you know, actors have to be able to do lots of different things, and while I'd say there's an ongoing theme [to the parts I play], I'm also not interested in having any real publicity about who I am and what my private life is and things like that. I'm an actor and I don't want to be a [fill-in-the-] blank actor.

Q: Do you really think that saying "I'm gay" would stop you from getting an array of roles?
A: That's not really the point. By using publicity to say something like that, it could become a person's M.O, and I'm not interested in that. I really think this article should be about The Temperamentals. I understand where you're coming from and why you think this is important and that this is a play about being true to yourself. But artists and activists are not quite the same thing, and I feel like support can come from lots of different ways.

Q: Do you get sick of reporters asking you about this?
A: They don't ask about it as much as you might think. Actually, it's been a long time since anyone asked it. I don't think it's really newsworthy if the gay guy from Ugly Betty is gay or not.

NY Magazine

Anonymous said...

Michael Urie isn't out.

Jake said...

I'm an actor and I don't want to be a [fill-in-the-] blank actor.

Me neither!

Anonymous said...

Why say things like that on your website if you don't want to talk about it?

I'm so tired of glass closets.

Anonymous said...

You are right, it doesn't make sense to be "a member of the LGBT community" and to have a problem with being out at the same time.

Anonymous said...

June 28, 2009

Michael Urie at NY Gay Pride

Anonymous said...

"I'm an actor and I don't want to be a [fill-in-the-] blank actor."

Oh we can fill in the blanks, how about closeted game-playing asshole for starters?

Anonymous said...

no problem with not wanting to be officially out, but why talking about it in interviews? I think is great some actors keep their social lives private but taht also means, just acting and no interviews or showing up on events and public HW places.
They can't having both, i wish they realize that already

Anonymous said...

So is Jake driving the minivan down to Philly?!

Anonymous said...

So is Jake driving the minivan down to Philly?!


^^

Absolutely! Reeking can't be done by itself!

Anonymous said...

Jake, Reese, Deacon, Ava and Baby Tile driving the minivan to Philly: National Fauxpoon's Reekecation

Anonymous said...

They should all visit Montecello. That would be so cute.

Maybe a trip to Hersey, Pa, the kiddos would love it.

Anonymous said...

Wouldn't you just LOVE being stuck in a minivan on a long roadtrip with "I don't shower everyday" Reese?! And having her spritzing her new fragrance In Bloom everywhere? You fuckeen know that minivan could never be re-rented or sold.

Anonymous said...

But if Reese is dead, how can they do that, in good conscience.

Minivan said...

But I'm too new and young to be sent to the wrecking yard! So what if I smell like cheap bathroom poop deodorizer and a cameltoe-chinned sweaty yeast infection? *cries*

Anonymous said...

Why is Jake still so interesting to you? He isn't very interesting, not even as an actor. To me he's a sexualy confused, decent actor who's living a boring life with an annoying woman and her kids. I think many want him to be this enigmatic man and are waiting for big things to happen in relation to him. It won't. He'll have a decent career and will stay with this woman for quite some time. I'm neither a troll nor stirrer or anything. I'm just stating my opinion.

eBay said...

1 minivan original driver's seat, leather/fabric combo, dark smokey grey, almost new. Sat in by Jake Gyllenhaal on semi-long road trip, D.C. to Philly. Small tight butt mark impression, sans testicles, is molded into seat cushion and has a slight anal pheromone scent. Absolutely guaranteed no seminal, vaginal, oral, lubes, or handcream fluids present on any part of seat (lab testing results available upon request). One curiosity: a deep 4 inch tear into the leather and padding, almost to the springs, on the far lower left side of seat, three bloody torn fingernails believed to be Jake's, still embedded.

Anonymous said...

2:47, I completely agree with you. Even in death, Heath is STILL ten times more interesting than Jake will ever be. Jake is never going to be the next Johnny Depp or even George Clooney. That won't happen. His career will be fine but he won't be setting any thing on fire. And he's never going to come out (how can you possibly come out when you don't think you're gay or even bi to start with?).

HazMat said...

Next scheduled pickup: One (1) minivan front passenger seat. Wear full protection gear incl gas mask and oxygen tank.

Anonymous said...

"Why is Jake still so interesting to you?"

You're not a troll nor a stirrer, who are you? I guess a bobble head, coming to a Jake site wioth a totally clear agenda and asking why people are here.

Why are you so interested in what people with whom you have nothing in common find interesting?

Get a life, for fucks sake.

Anonymous said...

To me he's a sexualy confused

Jake was sexualy confused when he was 11, now he knows he's gay.

Anonymous said...

Jake is going to be the next Ryan Phillipe. In both carrer and personal life.

Imo, Ryan has some serious issues.He always looks mentally disturbed :(

Anonymous said...

"2:47, I completely agree with you. Even in death, Heath is STILL ten times more interesting than Jake will ever be"

So why dont you go to a Heath site. Its beyond me why "fans" of different ilks like to take up space on this site. Nowhere else to go, I know, I know.

Anonymous said...

Why are you so interested in what people with whom you have nothing in common find interesting?

I'm just curious. Not everyone has evil intentions. Jeez.

Anonymous said...

And he's never going to come out (how can you possibly come out when you don't think you're gay or even bi to start with?).

ITA.

Anonymous said...

how can you possibly come out when you don't think you're gay or even bi to start with?

LOL!

Is this the latest trolly shit?

Anonymous said...

3:08 PM (and also 3:11 PM, I presume)

You are right.If we post here is because,in one way or another, we all care what's happening in Jake's life.
But this doesn't necessarily means the posters here like or love this new image of him. Being interested in a celebrity or artist is not always about admiration and praise.

You are automatically thinking that the ones who visit this site are Jake's fans but I think there are a lot of different commenters here.
Some of them are here only because they hate the fact that an actor is bearding and feeling he has to hide his homosexuality and some others just can't help laughing about how bad and asexual Jake & Reese look together. I mean, did you see the last photo-op? God, there was more sexual chemistry between Mickey Rourke and his dog Locki! (RIP,btw) It's impossible not talking and LOL about it!! :DDD

Anonymous said...

how can you possibly come out when you don't think you're gay or even bi to start with?

Gay tops might try to delude themselves, but bottoms like Jake ... no way! lol

Anonymous said...

Why is Jake still so interesting to you? He isn't very interesting...

Jake's bearding, living a lie for the public and another life in private, is quite interesting from time to time.

Anonymous said...

Duh! Jake is bottoming just because it's good for his health and because he supports natural tools!

Prostate massage has long been used as a means of maintaining prostate health and to promote increased sexual health. In the Orient, prostate massage has been included in traditional medicine for centuries. In recent years, many medical articles have been published which advocate prostatic massage as a treatment for chronic prostatitis, infertility, and benign prostate hypertrophy (BPH).

Anonymous said...

Tin foil hat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

A person wearing a tin foil hat.A tin foil hat is a piece of headgear made from one or more sheets of aluminium foil or similar material. Alternatively it may be a conventional hat lined with foil. Some people wear the hats in the belief that they act to shield the brain from such influences as electromagnetic fields, or against mind control and/or mind reading.

The concept of wearing a tin foil hat for protection from such threats has become a popular stereotype and term of derision; the phrase serves as a byword for paranoia and is associated with conspiracy theorists. In Japan, there is a religious cult, Pana Wave, based entirely on the conspiracy theory of electromagnetic fields. They dress in white clothes and wear specially made tin foil hats.[1][2]

Anonymous said...

Small tight butt mark impression, sans testicles, is molded into seat cushion

LOL!

Mickey said...

I miss Loki!

Anonymous said...

Jake is bottoming just because it's good for his health and because he supports natural tools!

This sounds like a much more realistic explanation for Jake's bottoming:)

"More and more men are learning that their prostate is a secondary sexual organ that can produce an intense prostate orgasm and is also called the p-spot or male g-spot. A typical prostate orgasm can last several minutes and many men claim that it is up to 100 percent stronger than a typical penile orgasm. Better still, a prostate orgasm helps to promote prostate health and for many men, improve their penile performance."

Prostate Orgasm-Learn How and Why You Want One

Anonymous said...

(((Mickey)))

Loki said...

I miss my Daddy!

Anonymous said...

(((Loki)))

Anonymous said...

Trolly and his favorite tin foil hat

Jake said...

Prostate Orgasm-Learn How and Why You Want One

One is never enough!

Anonymous said...

"some others just can't help laughing about how bad and asexual Jake & Reese look together. I mean, did you see the last photo-op?"

LOL I KNOW!!! *screams* LMAO sheeeet. Has Reese ever looked sexual off-camera? I mean, barely even with Ryan the supposed love of her life. Her kissing Ryan even in the good days was looking mighty coldfish-like. And here we're supposed to believe she's hot with Jake. I think she looked most comfy with Jake at the Italian aquaduct flanked with Mama Naomi and other person while her and Jake were nuzzling/whispering for the 2 cameras, and with 2 pic-takers there, but isn't the oddest time to look most comfy. Reese is a trip, thats for sure. Hurry and grow up Ava, so you can write that book. Start taking notes now.

Luke Macfarlane said...

Luke Macfarlane, June 10 2009

Q: You play a gay character. Is it difficult for you or are you gay yourself?
A: I am gay.

Q: So it’s not hard for you?
A: No, I have made the decision to be open about my sexuality. It’s just an aspect of my life like anything else. Just because I’m gay, doesn’t mean Scotty and I are the same in the least, though. I’ve had wonderful support from all the characters and especially from Matthew, because he plays my husband and is definitely not gay. He is open minded and never uncomfortable with anything. It’s truly a witness to his abilities as an actor.

Q: Have you ever been scared of being ’stereotyped’ as a gay character?
A: Oh, yes. There is definitely that fear. I think it’s important to shift that fear, as this is an important issue of our time. Equality for gays has been an important fight in America for the last 30 years. So, naturally I am scared of being stereotyped, but I have to put that fear aside.

Luke Macfarlane interview

Anonymous said...

I actually think that Reese is slightly nutty. No wonder Clint Eastwood didn't call her back, and no one besides Disney and C-list actors like Owen Wilson will work with her. But then again, you'd have to be a little crazy to beard for pathetic Jakey G.

Anonymous said...

Clint Eastwood is old and I'm sure he doesn't feel he has enough strenght to put up with Chin's raves.

Wilson is probably very stoned to notice anything around him

I can't figure out why Paul Rudd agreed to work w/ her again...
I used to think that guy might be cool in RL

oh well....

Anonymous said...

I always thought Paul Rudd was gay!

cowboy pron said...

Some cute young Swedish/Aussie-looking male model porn guy combined Jake and Heath's names for his porn name (and leaving out an L), Heath Gylenhaal. Might be a bad idea, a lawsuit waiting to happen, LOL:

Heath Gylenhaal, the new Bel Ami lust object, has a name problem. Even Bel Ami called him Jake Gylenhaal, on his promotional photos. Oops. That is the risk when you create a porn name from the two stars of "Brokeback Mountain."

NSFW (male nudes with hardons and ya know, doing stuff.. ) Sizing Up blog

Jake said...

So is it a sign I've made it in the world when some porn dude copies my name?

Anonymous said...

"Jake is never going to be the next Johnny Depp or even George Clooney. That won't happen."

It took years for Depp and Clooney to become big. Neither were young when they became true stars. It seems a lot of the big stars have better luck if they become big when they are older. The young ones seem to fade away or have real long low points. I'm not saying Jake will be huge, but if you are so anti Jake...Go away or stop being so hostile. Snarky is one thing, but negative is another.

Anonymous said...

It's not nice to tell people to go away.

Horny Jake said...

Hey that porn dude kinda looks like Paris Fountain Boy.

*calls attorney, demands them to set up a pre-lawsuit-threat in person meeting with porn dude, in Amsterdam*

Anonymous said...

But then again, you'd have to be a little crazy to beard for pathetic Jakey G.

You have to be a little crazy to use a fake bf for self promotion. The chin is working only for herself and for her own interest .

Jake said...

NSFW (male nudes with hardons and ya know, doing stuff.. )

Get Outta My Dreams, Get into My Bed!

Anonymous said...

THE PRESIDENT: There's a duck quacking in there somewhere. (Laughter.)

Posted on OMG

Obama Interrupted by Duck Ringtone - video

don't ask, don't tell said...

Lt. Choi Loses Round 1

The military board hearing Lt. Dan Choi's case suggested that the West Point graduate be discharged from the Army National Guard for violating the armed forces' ban on openly gay service members.

The four-officer panel made the recommendation Tuesday in Syracuse, N.Y., after a day of testimony. Lt. Gen. Thomas Miller of the First Army Division, and Gen. Craig McKinley, the chief of the National Guard Bureau, will make the final decision, according to The Post-Standard of Syracuse.

Choi said in a news conference following the hearing that he was disappointed but not deterred, adding that he refuses to lie about his relationships to keep his job.

The hearing was at the Thompson Road Armory in Syracuse, the headquarters of the 27th Brigade Combat Team, which oversees Choi’s National Guard Unit.

Choi, who came out in the Army Times newspaper and on The Rachel Maddow Show on MSNBC in March, graduated from West Point in 2003. An Arabic linguist, he served with the Army in Iraq for 15 months before leaving in 2008 to join the New York National Guard. According to Fanning, Choi is the first officer in the 10,600-member New York National Guard to face a discharge because of alleged violations of "don't ask, don't tell."

Advocate

Anonymous said...

Lt. Dan Choi - we have lost battle, but not war.

Anonymous said...

Heath Gylenhaal, the new Bel Ami lust object, has a name problem.

The boy doesn't have a size problem :)

Prop 8 Update said...

Preliminary injunction to block Proposition 8 is unlikely

The U.S. District Court judge considering a constitutional challenge to California's gay marriage ban says that blocking the law would make uncertain the marriages performed before a final ruling.

By Maura Dolan
8:38 PM PDT, June 30, 2009


A federal judge weighing a constitutional challenge of Proposition 8 said Tuesday that he was not likely to suspend the anti-gay marriage law without a trial.

In an order, U.S. District Court Judge Vaughn Walker said blocking the law before a trial might "inject still further uncertainty in an important area of concern and interest to the state and its citizens."

The federal lawsuit was filed shortly before the California Supreme Court in May upheld the state constitutionality of Proposition 8. The lawsuit, which will be argued by high-profile lawyers, contends that the November ballot initiative violates the equal protection and due process clauses of the federal Constitution.

Walker, in a written order, cited arguments by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown opposing a preliminary injunction because it would put a veil of uncertainty over same-sex marriages entered into during the period between the issuance of an injunction and the final ruling.

"To avoid the procedural and practical problems surrounding a preliminary injunction," Walker wrote, "the court is inclined to proceed directly and expeditiously to the merits" of the case.

A hearing on a preliminary injunction is scheduled for Thursday.

Walker said his decision in the case might depend on the history of California's ban on same-sex marriage, whether the ban restricts options for gays that are available to heterosexuals and whether requiring one man and one woman in a marriage promotes stereotypical gender roles.

Walker said he also wanted to explore contentions that Proposition 8 was passed with "discriminatory intent" and whether the "sole motivation for Prop. 8 was moral disapproval of gays and lesbians."

The federal lawsuit was filed over objections by gay rights lawyers, who fear an adverse ruling by the conservative U.S. Supreme Court could set back the marriage movement by years or decades.

But a Los Angeles political strategist put together a civil rights committee and hired former U.S. Solicitor Gen. Theodore Olson, a conservative, and famed lawyer David Boies, a liberal, to challenge the measure.

Olson said in a written statement that he was encouraged that the judge wanted to proceed directly to trial.

"This case is about protecting people's fundamental constitutional rights, and we agree that it is in everyone's best interest to resolve this matter as quickly as possible," he said.



L.A. Times

twitter said...

Okay so yeah its the Reeke faux fam in LA (gag), that is if you believe this twitter. If its a PR set up they sure went thru a lot of work with this made-up identity since he's Andrew Lih from Beijing China, the Bio Author of The Wikipedia Revolution, China Internet/tech, journalism prof at USC Annenberg come September, has 2,392 followers and follows 857, has *only* has 4,660 updates/entries, and all for one lousy fake Reeke sighting to make sure Jake's remaining fans will believe he's in LA!

Of course Andy could be mistaken, there's alot of people in LA who look like Reeke, Ava and deacon.

Btw what was it that troll last week stated with such authority that Reeke, Ava and Deacon checked out of the Four Seasons in DC and were on thier way driving to Philly? Uh huh.


"Just came back from dinner, sat next to Reese Witherspoon, her kids and Jake G. Her son hit me with a nut shell. Liking Venice"

Reeke in Venice

Anonymous said...

THE PRESIDENT: There's a duck quacking in there somewhere. (Laughter.)


He should have said: "Shut The Duck Up"

Extra Extra said...

Your chance to meet Reeke and tell Jake to grow some balls!

Philly Casting Call

Austin said...

"THE PRESIDENT: There's a duck quacking in there somewhere."

Oh no, Jake was drunk sextexting his "duck duck goose" game again.

Anonymous said...

"Shut The Duck Up"


ROTFLMAOPIMP!

Anonymous said...

Oh no, Jake was drunk sextexting his "duck duck goose" game again.

:)

Anonymous said...

Okay so yeah its the Reeke faux fam in LA (gag), that is if you believe this twitter.

Nah, twitter is a great tool for posting bullshit.

opps! said...

"Austin, is that you?"


horny Jake gets his speed dial water bird code names confused again and instead of sextexting his beloved pink-footed grey goose, he accidentally sends it to a political gadwall stud duck, telling him he wants his long bill in his tight quack RIGHT NOW

Anonymous said...

Your chance to meet Reeke and tell Jake to grow some balls!

Why would I want to meet Reeke?

I would love a chance to kick Jake's ass :)

Anonymous said...

"Nah, twitter is a great tool for posting bullshit."

Umm did you see who posted it?

Andrew Lih from Beijing China, the Bio Author of The Wikipedia Revolution, China Internet/tech, journalism prof at USC Annenberg come September, has 2,392 followers and follows 857, has *only* has 4,660 updates/entries


Don't tell me you think this guy is on Reeke's PR, LOL. Talk about paranoia and denial, sheesh.

Anonymous said...

Huh, who said anything about Reeke PR?

Feel free to believe whatever you want to believe, and keep in mind that other people have their own opinions.

Anonymous said...

"Your chance to meet Reeke"

"Why would I want to meet Reeke?"



"Your chance to meet Reeke" = poster being facetious

"Your chance to meet Reeke" = tell her how you really feel (phony ass bitch!)

"Your chance to meet Reeke" = tell him how you really feel (grow a pair!)

"Your chance to meet Reeke" = opportunity to do real life first hand bearding behavior analysis, keep ears open, get gossip if any, take secret pics, be a stalker, recruit your friends and go on an Austin-Baby Tile-reconnaissance mission! Maybe even get to jerkoff Jake and sign a Confidentiality Agreement!

Anonymous said...

Your chance to meet Reeke

Very, very, very slim chance.

Anonymous said...

"Huh, who said anything about Reeke PR?

Feel free to believe whatever you want to believe, and keep in mind that other people have their own opinions."

Oh sorry, when you posted "Nah, twitter is a great tool for posting bullshit." I was assuming ypou were saying the twitter sighting was fake and it was for PR's benefit. So tell me what you meant when you said "twitter is a great tool for posting bullshit." after that particular twitter Reeke/Ava/Deacon sighting. I mean, it sounds like you think the twitterer was making it up, right?

Anonymous said...

So tell me what you meant when you said "twitter is a great tool for posting bullshit."

It means that twitter makes it so easy to post all kind of bullshit and made up bullshit - few words and that's it!

It's also means that there is no reason to belive everything you read on twitter.

Anonymous said...

"Feel free to believe whatever you want to believe, and keep in mind that other people have their own opinions."


So you don't believe the validity of that twitter sighting, even with the twitterer's apparently good credentials? Besides the "I spotted a movie star" factor, which I very much doubt this guy is into, what would he have to gain by lying about seeing Reeke?



(PS. Now before anyone accuses me of being a Babbler, of trying to lead this into a "they were at dinner, so they must be a real couple" scenario, NO. I am not a JIS/Babbler. My question is about why a Reeke twitter sighting by a seemingly accurate source would still be brushed off as bullshit.)

Anonymous said...

"It means that twitter makes it so easy to post all kind of bullshit and made up bullshit - few words and that's it!

It's also means that there is no reason to belive everything you read on twitter."



Thanks for discussing this but actually 5:07 you didn't include my whole sentence or the answer I was seeking:

So tell me what you meant when you said "twitter is a great tool for posting bullshit." after that particular twitter Reeke/Ava/Deacon sighting. I mean, it sounds like you think the twitterer was making it up, right?


I'm not looking for another philosophical circular non-answer, i.e. your "easy to post all kind of bullshit and made up bullshit - few words and that's it! It's also means that there is no reason to belive everything you read on twitter."

5:07, I'm looking for your answer on if you believe that particular twitter 06/30/2009 dinner sighting was faked by the Twitterer, Andrew Lih, and if so, why, what did he have to gain, or if you even think he is a fake persona made up by PR or whoever.

Anonymous said...

Besides the "I spotted a movie star" factor, which I very much doubt this guy is into, what would he have to gain by lying about seeing Reeke?

People do post made up bullshit, including fake sightings - we are sure about that, right?

We don't see or understand their reason and motivation, but that does NOT mean that their posts are true. Posts might be true, and might be fake.

5:07 AM said...

I don't know if the sighting is made up or not since there is nothing to prove or disprove it. The sighting or "sighting" isn't interesting enough to give a damn one way or another.

Anonymous said...

"People do post made up bullshit, including fake sightings - we are sure about that, right?

We don't see or understand their reason and motivation, but that does NOT mean that their posts are true. Posts might be true, and might be fake."


YES OF COURSE BUT I AM TALKING ABOUT ONE PARTICULAR SIGHTING. YOU ARE NOT ANSWERING THE QUESTION:

I'm looking for your answer on if you believe that particular twitter 06/30/2009 dinner sighting was faked by the Twitterer, Andrew Lih, and if so, why, what did he have to gain, or if you even think he is a fake persona made up by PR or whoever.

Sorry to SHOUT but it is for emphasis. I am NOT asking a general question if/if not all Tweets are to be believed, I am asking about a certain one, with apparently good credentials. Your avoidance and resistance to answer about it is odd.

Anonymous said...

"I don't know if the sighting is made up or not since there is nothing to prove or disprove it."

So outside of a pic, the credentials of the sighter carries no weight whatsoever?

Anonymous said...

"The sighting or "sighting" isn't interesting enough to give a damn one way or another."

Oh but you spent so much time avoiding the question, and going on and on and on about how you never know if its faked and everyone has opinions....

5:07 AM said...

I ignore such "sightings". Clear enough?

Anonymous said...

What if there was a twitter sighting of Jake and Austin? Or one of Jake and a baby, possibly BT? Or Jake and Austin and a baby, possibly BT? Say any of these scenarios are singular twitter sightings, but none have pics. What credentials would the twitterer have to have in order for you to believe that the sighting is most likely valid?

5:07 AM said...

Oh but you spent so much time avoiding the question, and going on and on and on about how you never know if its faked and everyone has opinions....

As you can see I don't avoid the question. Anyway, why do you care so much about my or other people opinion?

My point is that twitter doesn't equal truth. That point is much more important than any Reeke sighting.

Anonymous said...

What if there was a twitter sighting of Jake and Austin? Or one of Jake and a baby, possibly BT?

Are you still claiming "I am not a JIS/Babbler"? LOL!

Anonymous said...

"My point is that twitter doesn't equal truth. That point is much more important than any Reeke sighting."

Huh?! So what's a twitter Reeke sighting?!

Anonymous said...

twitter Reeke sighting = any Reeke sighting reported on Twitter

Anonymous said...

What if there was a twitter sighting of Jake and Austin? Or one of Jake and a baby, possibly BT?

Are you still claiming "I am not a JIS/Babbler"? LOL!



^^^ FYI like I stated before NO I AM NOT A BABBLER/JIS or even JIB. I'm just wondering what it would take for people to be convinced that a twitter sighting sans pics might be authentic and valid. So far its only been Reeke, and many are saying the sightings are faked by PR in order to throw people off the scent of Jake because he might be with Austin/BT and that PR obviously wants to promote Reeke.

I'm a Jaustin/BT believer, but if there was a Jaustin/BT twitter sighting I would not automatically believe it, I would take the credentials of the sighter into consideration as well as the other evidence if there is some, like other sightings in the same geo area, etc. Some people's reluctance here to accept twitter sightings of Reeke even by most likely credible sources and the way they dismiss them so quickly is odd to me. I just wonder if under the same circumstances in a Jaustin/BT twitter sighting if they would hold the same disdain and discard it as being faked, too.

For me the principles of evidence and credentials having weight has to be the same in any sighting analysis, not more lenient for one and stricter for the other.

Another thing is if the Reeke/Jaustin twitterer is a celeb themselves, can we trust their twitter, believe them? What if the twitterer isn't in show business but is well known, is that enough validity?

Sorry to be so longwinded, I'm just curious about how people decide what to believe and why.

Anonymous said...

"twitter Reeke sighting = any Reeke sighting reported on Twitter"

Are sightings posted in a blog or LJ more believable than a twitter sighting?

Anonymous said...

No, but it is easier to post on twitter.

simple said...

What if there was a twitter sighting of Jake and Austin? Or one of Jake and a baby, possibly BT?

Twitter, blogs, LJ, gossip sites, newspaper, rags and other sources of celebrity sightings:

if there are no pictures then no one can prove a thing = you have to decide whether you believe it or not.

Anonymous said...

Another thing is if the Reeke/Jaustin twitterer is a celeb themselves, can we trust their twitter, believe them?

Absolutely not.
Fakers are fakers, technology doesn't change that.

Anonymous said...

"you have to decide whether you believe it or not."

What makes YOU believe it or not?

Anonymous said...

"Another thing is if the Reeke/Jaustin twitterer is a celeb themselves, can we trust their twitter, believe them?"

"Absolutely not.
Fakers are fakers, technology doesn't change that."


^^ So to you, ALL twitterers, including celebs, are faking sightings?

If Billy Crystal has an authenticated Twitter account, and he tweets that he saw Jake and Austin at a LA coffee shop, he's lying? He's faking it?

Anonymous said...

Smart blogger and a good description of the sighting is the only way I might believe it.

Anonymous said...

I feel like I'm having a convo with someone who still believes the earth is flat, it's hopeless! Goodnight!

Anonymous said...

So to you, ALL twitterers, including celebs, are faking sightings?

No, I've said that you can't trust twitter just because an autenticated celebrity posted it.

Anonymous said...

I feel like I'm having a convo with someone who still believes the earth is flat, it's hopeless!

What is your problem? Who said that YOU shouldn't believe everything YOU want?

Anonymous said...

"Another thing is if the Reeke/Jaustin twitterer is a celeb themselves, can we trust their twitter, believe them?"



"Absolutely not."


^^sounds like you don't trust or believe anybody, not even give them leeway. Its all or nothing for you isnt it, they are a total liar if they don't have pictures, right?

Anonymous said...

Why Stubborn tb, I recognize you anywhere.

Anonymous said...

Its all or nothing for you isnt it, they are a total liar if they don't have pictures, right?

No, the problem with twitter posts is that I can't know if someone is lying or telling the truth.

Ted reposted said...

One Tweet-Deceiver Bonus Blind Vice!

Celebs aren't exactly known to be truth tellers — Toothy Tile continuously lying to himself and every ridiculous excuse Lindsay Lohan's made to get out of pretty much anything are proof enough of that. But Melinda Miscreant is another story. Dame's fibbing 'bout her own flesh 'n' blood, incredibly tacky.

Mel, who somehow still gets TV work despite peaking years ago, is as guilty of desiring followers on her Twitter page as every other Kutcher-like celeb with an online presence.

But that's not the truly heinous part. The despicable side of M.M.'s Internet persona is that she's totally painting a prettier pic of her motherly abilities, and the ones who are totally paying for it are her kids:

M.M. has gotten on enough people's nerves in her recent attention-seeking antics that she's doing whatever she can do to get her former fans to like her again. Instead of her sexuality (hasn't worked in a while), she's focusing on winning Mother of the Year—without really working for it.

Mel is known to tweet that she's at the park with her kids, when in actuality, she's really she's off tanning! So say totally tight M.M. sources who are with the babe while she deceptweets right in front of 'em! She'll totally update her status to say she's with her kids at, say, an ice cream parlor, when really she's at the spa, sans offspring. We're surprised she's putting this much effort into faux-mothering her kids instead of just schlepping them outside for a photo op. At least then your kids would actually see ya sometime.

And we thought the kids' father was the badly behaving one. Hardly. Certainly he has his own parenting problems, but at least he barely tweets a thing, let alone lies.

And It Ain't: Victoria Beckham, Nicole Richie, Demi Moore

Anonymous said...

Smart blogger and a good description of the sighting is the only way I might believe it.

IA

For example, Reeke in NYC, meeting Natalie in some restaurant.

Anonymous said...

you have to decide whether you believe it or not.

What makes YOU believe it or not?


I do my little research about the poster and his posts and decide to believe it or not. (I research only intriguing sightings, not Reeke.)

PoP - Can Jerry Bruckheimer attract female gamers? said...

Although most guys know Hollywood uber-producer Jerry Bruckheimer for summer action flicks like Top Gun, The Rock, Con Air and Armageddon, Van Toffler, president of MTV Networks Music & Logo Group, would love for Bruckheimer to take MTV Games out of its comfort zone of rhythmic gaming like The Beatles: Rock Band and attract more females.

“It’s a much more natural and organic fit for us,” added Toffler. “I hope that Jerry takes us to more adventurous places around storytelling in gaming.”

Wait a second? Bruckheimer and storytelling women are interested in? Lest you forget, with hit TV shows like C.S.I., Without a Trace, Cold Case, and Amazing Race, Bruckheimer has been attracting viewers of the fairer sex since his first foray into TV 12 years ago. That too, was a major reason for the partnership between MTV Games and Jerry Bruckheimer Games. The deal, which was locked back in December 2007, finally took shape this week with the hiring of former Microsoft Executive Producer Jim Veevaert and former Ubisoft executive Jay Cohen to lead Bruckheimer’s game studio.

“I see more of a connection to women coming to gaming as being a spark for Jerry Bruckheimer’s style of storytelling coming to gaming,” said Toffler. “Gaming is really starting to explode with women, particularly story-driven games like The Sims. I think Jerry has managed to bring both men and women into his storytelling from Pirates of the Caribbean to National Treasure. He does a great blend of action in storytelling and moving narrative forward.”

One of Bruckheimer Films’ latest projects, Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, should attract both male and female audiences when Disney releases the tentpole movie next summer. Based on the Ubisoft videogame, Bruckheimer hopes to do for games what he did for theme park rides.

“We liked the concept of the game and felt like we could do some interacting character development with the characters,” said Bruckheimer. “We felt we could make it very exciting, which I think we’ve done.”

When it comes to translating a game into a film, Bruckheimer went straight to the source, hiring Prince of Persia creator Jordan Mechner.

“I think to honor what gamers like about the game, you work with the people who actually created the game,” said Bruckheimer. “So the individual who created the games for us worked with us on the screenplay and everything else, so he's part of the process. He's not going to do something that would hurt his fan base.”

Bruckheimer brought in director Mike Newell (Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire) to direct Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time, opening May 28, 2010. Jake Gyllenhaal steps into the shoes of the prince with Ben Kingsley, Gemma Arterton, Alfred Molina and Steve Toussaint rounding out the cast.

GamesRadar

Anonymous said...

"Sorry to be so longwinded, I'm just curious about how people decide what to believe and why."

Dear Just Curious,

You will be happier and less curious if you remain among your own kind. Maybe have more money and friends, too.

Anonymous said...

So to you, ALL twitterers, including celebs, are faking sightings?

So to you, ALL twitterers, including celebs, are always posting the truth?!

Of course not, so we are back to square one - everyone must decide who and what to believe.

Anonymous said...

he accidentally sends it to a political gadwall stud duck, telling him he wants his long bill in his tight quack RIGHT NOW

LOL!

Anonymous said...

Prop 8 - To avoid the procedural and practical problems surrounding a preliminary injunction," Walker wrote, "the court is inclined to proceed directly and expeditiously to the merits" of the case. A hearing on a preliminary injunction is scheduled for Thursday.

Good.

Rahm Emanuel's Fear of Clinton Failures Holding Back Gay Rights? said...

This bit in a Washington Post article about the challenges the Obama administration faces because of "ideologixal diversity" among Democrats spells it out pretty clearly:

"Maintaining a sense of common interest across the party is a paramount goal. Early on, administration officials and Democratic leaders agreed they would steer clear of controversial social issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage. And to the discontent of many liberal Democrats, Congress intends to remain generally silent on those fronts. 'They know the consequences of '94. It looms,' White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said of the legislative debacles in President Bill Clinton's early tenure that produced the 1994 Republican landslide. 'That division led to failure. . . . Our chances for success only come about by unity. That, as a culture up there, has been enforced by enough people that enough members believe.'"

Of course, a lot of attitudes can change in five years and the culture is now way ahead of the White House on so many fronts.

Towleroad

Anonymous said...

One of the ways to tell if a sighting is probably real, be it on twitter or somewhere else, is the wording and description. I'd say the latest Reeke twittering falls in neutral territory, could be real, could be made up.

Either way you know Reeke had to get out there and try to make people think it was Reese's kids in the van with them in D.C. last week. I'm not buying it.

Anonymous said...

"No, the problem with twitter posts is that I can't know if someone is lying or telling the truth."

twitter, blogs, whats the difference?

Anonymous said...

Wehre were her kids out of curiosity? The last time they were papped was on 6/17 with Ryan, Deacon was anyway.

Paul Rudd has a 4 year old son that was with him along with his wife in DC while filming. That person took a quick glance at the passengers in the back seat. He says he saw Rudd and 2 kids, we assume one kid was his but are you that nutty to believe that Jake and Reese were driving around DC at night with Rudd, his kid and BT in the back? For what purpose? Fresh air?? Reese and Rudd and kid was a "distraction" so he could take BT out for a ride in a minivan at night?? LOL!!! Yeah right. Most likely the kids weren't there, but the person could have mistaken seeing a 2nd kid or it was a friend of Rudd's son.

Use your heads for once.

Anonymous said...

twitter, blogs, whats the difference?

No real difference. Blog posts usually have more details, require a bit more effort to write.

Anonymous said...

The twitter sighting of them and the kids are no different than the other sightings of them together pre-twitter. Why do you think that this false or that they are trying to "cover". Even if you believe in BT, how the hell can you believe that he would bring it to DC for a week long photo-op? And where was the BT the rest of the week, with a nanny? So what would be the point of bring it to DC???

There is no BT and deep down you know it to. Just some really bad fan fic Ted has pushed. That along with your anger about you know what.

Anonymous said...

That along with your anger about you know what.

Anger about what?

Anonymous said...

Use your heads for once.

Don't you love babblers and their advice? lol

Anonymous said...

Use yours for once 10:46. How many four-year-olds take along a friend when they travel with their parents? None that I've ever heard of, that is entirely too young. And what, someone mistakenly thought that some some object in the car was a child? Nonsense. There were two kids in that car. And we know the sighting happened because, unlike a lot of these twitters, we have pictures of Reeke in a van.

What could have been a mistake is whether the person in the car was really Paul Rudd, or maybe a male nanny or bodyguard.

Anonymous said...

Photo opps and a few meals with the Chin don't take up much time, leaving Jake free to spend it with Baby Tile, and maybe Austin.

And I for one think Jake chose the Chin to beard in part because she has kids, so what better cover for getting caught with a child or doing something that you wouldn't expect somewone without children to do.

Anonymous said...

Hm, interesting Baby Tile theories :)

Anonymous said...

With Austin filming OTH, what else was Jake going to do with Baby Tile? Television shoots often involve long hours, I saw an interview with Sophia Bush talking about how she caught a plane to fly up to NYC for premiere of a movie she was in right after wrapping up the first day of filming on OTH around dawn.

Anonymous said...

Maybe Jake knows PoP is gonna flop and he is considering to put a cooperative daycare.
I mean, if this acting thing doesn't really works for him anymore, mommy & daddy's money is not going to last forever.

And BT has to eat,get dressed and go to school! And, of course, he is going to need some therapy too very soon.

Baby Tile said...

"the person could have mistaken seeing a 2nd kid"

Shit! This fatty baby food is making me look like a suitcase!

Jake said...

You aren't fat!

Anonymous said...

"And I for one think Jake chose the Chin to beard in part because she has kids, so what better cover for getting caught with a child or doing something that you wouldn't expect somewone without children to do."

I never thought about that but you could be right. BT could always be a Philipe "cousin".

As for Reeke driving around with BT, Ted said TT thinks he's infallible and not going to get caught. People with that mindset tend to take chances. I wouldn't put it past Jake to be with BT thinking no one will put 2+2 together.

Anonymous said...

The Baby Tile believers are a sad bunch.

Baby Tile said...

I want diet food and a personal trainer! I'm a Hollywood baby, so what if you hide me away I still gotta look good for when those 60 Minutes cameras show up.

Anonymous said...

11:19, so what if we believe in love and babies. You got a problem with that? How does it affect you?

Anonymous said...

I want diet food and a personal trainer!

Baby Tile is gay!

Anonymous said...

The Baby Tile stuff is nonsense. That's why the people who want to believe it have to create all of these silly scenarios that defy reason and logic to make it possible.

I am far more intrigued by Ted's comment about Toothy trying to convince himself he's straight. Notice Ted didn't write about convincing the powers that be or the general public, but himself.

Is it possible that Jake has not accepted himself as gay? Is it possible he considers himself bi (even if Ted thinks he is fooling himself)? If indeed Jake believes himself to be bi, then is it possible he is in a real sexual relationship ( I don't say romantic) with Reese (which suits his self-identification and placates her, and possibly fools her too), as well as, having sex on the side with the Austin and other men?

Just some thoughts.

Anonymous said...

Bisexual men date men and women - bisexual Jake could date a woman he really likes or loves, a woman he likes having sex with.

Jake is gay, Reese is a beard.

Anonymous said...

I am far more intrigued by Ted's comment about Toothy trying to convince himself he's straight.

Ted's quote?

Anonymous said...

BT is more believable than Jake fucking Reese!

Anonymous said...

I totaly agree.

Anonymous said...

11:23

This isn't about liking love & babies, we are talking about the posibility of a very well known actor raising a child with his gay lover while,at the same time, "dating" one of the most famous bitches in HW.

It JUST CAN'T BE HAPPENING!!! Celebrities can't go to the supermarket without being photograpphed, HOW in Hell he can be parenting a kid??!!!! HOW, MY dear God, this can be remotely true??!! Please, SOMEBODY EXPLAIN IT TO ME, before I get CRAZY,CRAZY,CRAAAZZZYYY!!!!


(Forget it, too late)

Baby Tile said...

My truth is stranger than your fiction!

Anonymous said...

Ted wasn't saying TT thinks he's straight, but that he thinks TT is fooling himself if he thinks everyone is buying the dog and pony show. I also think Ted might be implying that TT is lying to himself about how it is helping his career. All he has done is help sell some crappy tabloids, crappy Reese movies, and maybe some Avon products.

And nobody is creating scenarios, just trying to explain what in the hell Jake was doing driving around with two children that were not Ava and Deacon. Which brings us back to TT being so arrogant that he thinks he can do what he wants and everyone will buy it.

And by the way, I really doubt this is the first time Jake has done something like this, he just happened to get caught this time.

It is you who cannot deal with that fact.

Anonymous said...

HOW in Hell he can be parenting a kid??!!!!

With a lot of difficulty and help from the family and friends :)

Anonymous said...

One great thing about earthquakes is how everyone runs outside. Talk about truth and getting caught, LOL. So who knows where in LA and what Jake/Austin/BT might be doing when one hits.

Jake said...

"dog and pony show"

You mean the bitch and stallion show.

Atticus said...

"dog and pony show"

Whut? Where's my pony?

Jake "I Feel Pretty" said...

"All he has done is help sell....maybe some Avon products."

Like pretty blushes and skin-so-soft? Cool!

Anonymous said...

Jake obviously is not going to take Baby Tile grocery shopping at that pap magnet Whole Foods in WeHo. But a Jake who knows all those photos of Reeke on the road are arranged probably did think he was safe in D.C., plus he had Reese with him, and the photographer was too busy trying to get their picture, which was probably what he counts on. Unless you've heard of Baby Tile, nobody is going to get excited about a couple of kids in the back seat and would probably think it was inappropriate to take their picture.

Anonymous said...

One great thing about earthquakes is how everyone runs outside.

Remember that gossip about Clooney, his gay lover and earthquake? :)

Anonymous said...

"Remember that gossip about Clooney, his gay lover and earthquake?"

NO! TELL!

Anonymous said...

PLEASE!

Anonymous said...

I remember the fire alarm in the Gyllenhaal's hotel a few years ago.

Jake wasn't alone in the room...and I doubt he was staying with Maggie or in the king size bed with his parents.Although, with man-child Jake it is impossible to be sure...

Anonymous said...

I have a str8 single guy friend who lives in a large apt complex and whenever there's a quake in the middle of the night he runs out the door and looks for all the females neighbors in their panties/birthday suits, LOL.

Anonymous said...

PS, my friend has had them run into his arms and hug him because they're all shook up, LOL.

Anonymous said...

"Jake wasn't alone in the room...and I doubt he was staying with Maggie or in the king size bed with his parents.Although, with man-child Jake it is impossible to be sure..."

He said, on Letterman, that he was with a friend.

Anonymous said...

^^

Oh yeah? doing what??

Anonymous said...

"Jake wasn't alone in the room.."

Yeah and wasn't it odd how no pics or descriptions were given. Whoever it was, Chris or Austin, disappeared!

Jake said...

"Oh yeah? doing what??"


Getting friendly!

Anonymous said...

11:27 the only sane poster here. The fangirls that believe in BT really don't believe either, they just like the idea of BT because of their rather odd view of gay males plus it fits in with their slash/fanfic.

In thier fanfic, Reese is more than willing to drive around DC at night while in the middle of filming her new movie with BT shoved in the back seat.

Next thing you know they will say that she was the egg donar and is breastfeeding BT!!

Keep repeating BS won't make it true.

No wonder the BT fangirls and OMG hate twitter, no sightings of Jake and BT, LOL!

Anonymous said...

"He said, on Letterman, that he was with a friend."

Also iirc reports from the owners/the local news said the G's had 3 rooms, S&N, M&P, Jake and a male friend.

Oh cmon, you expect them to say Jake a male lover?!

Anonymous said...

"Next thing you know they will say that she was the egg donar and is breastfeeding BT!!"



eerr....they already said it a couple of days ago :(

correction! said...

Oh cmon, you expect them to say Jake and a male lover?!

Anonymous said...

Oh cmon, you expect them to say Jake a male lover?!


^^

A name would have been good!

Anonymous said...

12:06 PM #2

No need to make up bullshit, trolly 12:04 PM doesn't need your help!

Anonymous said...

Reese is not stupid. She would never risk being caught with Jake and "Baby Tile." With cell phones, paps, twitter, etc., you can't be sure who will see you and what they know about you.

Reese may be many things, but she is not careless. And she sure as hell would not take that kind of risk for Jake.

Anonymous said...

C'mon 12:06, its all theory and guesses and opinions and brainstorming here, nothing wrong with that. How does it affect you personally?

Anonymous said...

"Remember that gossip about Clooney, his gay lover and earthquake?"

NO! TELL!


September 2000

Clooney In Naked EarthQuake Terror

Hollywood hunk GEORGE CLOONEY was so frightened by a recent Californian earthquake that it sent him running into the streets naked.

The former ER star, who plays a tough ship captain in THE PERFECT STORM, lost all of his heroic instincts when he heard the earthquake near his home in Century City, California last year (99). Clooney recalls, "It was a beauty and it scared the s**t out of me. I came running out of the house naked with my pig, MAX - he was naked too.

"And my buddy BEN, who was in the guesthouse down below, came running out naked with a gun, because he thought someone was breaking in. And we were hiding in the lattice-work at the front of the house.

"So were are naked, like this, and my biggest fear was that we would end up getting killed and they would find two naked guys, a pig and a gun. It would have been the end of my career even if I'd survived, because it would have been on one of those entertainment cable channels - 'True Hollywood Stories!' or something. Horrifying!" (RGS/WNBTI/RC)

Source: WENN

link

Anonymous said...


In thier fanfic, Reese is more than willing to drive around DC at night while in the middle of filming her new movie with BT shoved in the back seat.


But Reese was willing to drive around in a mini van with Jake, "Paul Ruddd" and two children who were not hers in the the middle of filming. The fact one of those children could have been Baby Tile doesn't change a thing. And who says it was in the middle of the night?

Believe me, Reese has done "stupider" things.

Anonymous said...

"Reese is not stupid. She would never risk being caught with Jake and "Baby Tile." With cell phones, paps, twitter, etc., you can't be sure who will see you and what they know about you.

Reese may be many things, but she is not careless. And she sure as hell would not take that kind of risk for Jake."

Uh huh. FYI Reese isn't infallible. Reese is also a liar and a phony, you can bet your ass if/when she takes chances she's fully prepared with a cover story.

Anonymous said...

I read what Ted said. He could have made it clear that he was talking about Jake's efforts to fool the public. He wasn't talking about the pr campaign. He was talking about Jake's fooling himself.

Why is the idea that Jake may be fighting his real sexuality (being gay, or just messed up and confused, such a difficult idea to contemplate? I think it's very possible that Jake does not want to believe that he's gay. I think it is possible he fucks Reese, and also has sex with men.

Anonymous said...

12:12 #1 thank you! Revealing too, heh.. "BEN". Even if its true like Clooney told it, it is hilarious to imagine 2 naked guys, a pig and a gun hiding behind a lattice, LMAO!!

Anonymous said...

Jake is 28, he knows he's gay for a long time and that's why he needs a beard.

Anonymous said...

Reese is not stupid. She would never risk being caught with Jake and "Baby Tile."

Reese has no reason to worry, she has her PR team, tabloids, magazines and gossip sites to sell her fauxmance fiction.

If TBs don't believe in Baby Tile, who else would give it a second thought?

Anonymous said...

Reese is not infalliable, but she's not a complete fool. And she would have to be a total fool to be in a car with Jake and "his children."

Reese is about Reese.

Anonymous said...

"I think it is possible he fucks Reese,"

IMO if Jake and Reese have sex together at all it's mutual masturbation while admiring themselves in a mirror.

Jake "I Feel Pretty" said...

Masturbation while admiring myself in the mirror: The Ultimate Orgasm!

Anonymous said...

Just when you thought the Baby Tile fiction couldn't get any sillier.

Anonymous said...

"Just when you thought the Baby Tile fiction couldn't get any sillier.'

You come along.

Anonymous said...

Havent you guys ever heard of "compartmentalization"? Look it up.

Im sure someone told Jake to just STFU - he's always saying things like, "well, I had a crush on a guy once, doesnt everybody?"

Ummmmm. Not.

«Oldest ‹Older   1001 – 1200 of 1891   Newer› Newest»