Monday 13 February 2012

Gay Sex Is The Last Hollywood Taboo?

When Ellen DeGeneres came out of the closet as the first openly gay sitcom star in 1997—and her fictional self followed suit—a parade of gay characters came after her. There was Will & Grace, and Carrie Bradshaw’s Sex and the City sidekick, Stanford. In movies, the gay best friend became a staple, from My Best Friend’s Wedding to Mean Girls. Yet none of these characters do what gay men do. As Hollywood portrays it, the homosexual man is, astonishingly, sexless.

The film’s screenwriter, Dustin Lance Black, who won an Oscar for his Milk screenplay, says that a love scene would have been too revisionist historically. "I certainly didn’t want to see J. Edgar doing it," says Black, who is gay. "In the 1930s, oftentimes, a loving relationship with gay men was never consummated."

Max Mutchnick, the co-creator of Will & Grace, remembers attending a party the night before the show’s pilot was filmed. Mutchnick recalls being told by (the also gay) director Joel Schumacher: "Whatever you do, don’t make it too butt-fucky. Don’t let anyone in the audience think about butt fucking and you’ll be fine."

Mutchnick continues, "The sad reality is, if you’re in a theater and they show gay sex, someone in the audience will shout, ‘Ewww!’"

That’s the crux of it. Studio executives aren’t necessarily homophobic, but the film business is in a financial slump and averse to risks even in the best times. Though gay marriage is now more accepted across the United States, the industry is driven by tickets sold to straight men. That’s why lesbian sex gets a pass: when Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis spend a steamy night together in Black Swan, it helps sell tickets. There’s no similar financial bump attached to gay male intercourse. As one producer noted, anal sex is still considered something out of the ordinary, anyway. In The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, the anal sex scene is part of a rape between a man and woman—existing as a symbol of sexual sadism.

I emailed our film critic David Ansen, the artistic director of the Los Angeles Film Festival, to ask whether there was gay sex I had overlooked in any recent movies. He wrote back: "There were actually movies this year with gay sex but really nobody saw them because they only played film festivals, like the very sexy Christopher and His Kind, which was made for Brit TV, and the still unreleased Leave It on the Floor, a musical with an all-black cast about the voguing world. Or James Franco’s experimental student film about Hart Crane, which has very explicit gay sex in it. The movies with gay sex tend to be ghettoized as gay films and not seen by crossover audiences."

When you ask gay screenwriters and directors to name the most explicit gay sex scene in a mainstream film, they often gulp in silence. Then they name 2005’s Brokeback Mountain. But that tent scene between Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger is still relatively tame. "I don’t think I would say Brokeback Mountain, because it’s not that explicit," says B. Ruby Rich, the film professor at UC Santa Cruz who coined the phrase New Queer Cinema. "We’re in the post–Brokeback Mountain moment. Even a film like Gus Van Sant’s Milk is astonishingly chaste. The actual life of Harvey Milk was drastically different than that, given it was the ’70s in San Francisco and men were fucking in every doorway."

Real societal change is always the product of the stories we see. In 1967, Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner made interracial marriage normal just months after the Supreme Court ruled that anti-miscegenation laws were unconstitutional. That’s why there’s more at stake in this gay-sex debate than just the titillation. If Hollywood refuses to push boundaries, to make more people comfortable with something that a segment of America is still uncomfortable with, gay people remain second-class citizens. "Here’s my thing with gay sex," Dustin Lance Black says. "In terms of sex, we get plenty of that every day in our own lives and thrown on the Internet. I feel like what I’m really interested in is gay romance." And that’s the real problem with no gay sex. You can’t tell a real love story if nobody is doing it.

Source:  Why Does Hollywood Hate Gay Sex? by Ramin Setoodeh

3,719 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   3401 – 3600 of 3719   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

It's the only thing he can get

not after Source Code.

Anonymous said...

What Source Code has to do with anything?

Anonymous said...

We've noticed Jake's career losing momentum long before Source Code - his peers have 2, 4, 7 new projects in the pipeline, Jake has 0 for quite some time.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Stupid trolly, you should try to find something better to do with your time.

Page Six said...

Jake Gyllenhaal has been getting rave reviews for his latest role . . . in a music video. The actor, who appeared on the big screen last in “Source Code,” directed by David Bowie’s son Duncan Jones, plays a serial killer in a video for “Time to Dance” by French band the Shoes. The clip — in which Gyllenhaal attacks hard-partying hipsters while wearing a fencing uniform — seems inspired by “American Psycho” protagonist Patrick Bateman. That character’s creator, Bret Easton Ellis, has given Gyllenhaal props for the role, tweeting, “Stunned by how scary/funny/catchy this is. Jake G is awesome.” Ellis has also been tweeting ideas this month for an “American Pyscho” sequel set in LA. Yesterday it emerged that Gyllenhaal is in talks to star in “An Enemy,” about a history teacher who discovers his double on a rented DVD and seeks him out. According to Variety, Gyllenhaal will play two roles in the film, described as “dark and edgy.”

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/pagesix/gyllenhaal_embraces_dark_roles_aRjKVjp4pweRXalBEMrgOO#ixzz1peOOZYFK

Anonymous said...

Maryam Ayir ‏ @JibbaJaaba
There are a few people in hollywood that I think are in the closet and Jake Gyllenhaal is one... along w/ Zac Efron. @SiradLennon

Anonymous said...

officiallyben ‏ @officiallyben
I just googled pic of ryan seacrest kissing teri hatcher. Totally not convinced that he likes women

CoolGreenPines ‏ @CoolGreenPines
@officiallyben I've seen that kiss. It's looks very awkward. Do you think Jake Gyllenhal (sp?) is gay or straight?

officiallyben ‏ @officiallyben
@CoolGreenPines jake gyllenhaal is open to the possibility that he could fall for a man. Or a woman. He's said so.

Anonymous said...

jake gyllenhaal is open to the possibility that he could fall for a man. Or a woman. He's said so.

When?

Anonymous said...

During Brokeback promotion time.

Jake changed his mind during Rendition promotion time and said he's straight.

Anonymous said...

very convenient.

Jake said...

Nothing is written in stone!

Anonymous said...

Very suggestive 7:17 AM :)

Anonymous said...

Wow Saramago is a Nobel Winner writer.

Jake said...

DUH!!! Only the best is good enough for me!

Jake said...

P.S. Except massage places.

Anonymous said...

BGarcia ‏ @berikgee
"@jannyyylee: My sister had brunch in NYC and happened to be sitting two tables down from Jake Gyllenhaal #sojealous" http://twitpic.com/8ywfca

OMG said...

Damn PR and their fake photos!

Anonymous said...

Damn, we can't see the person having brunch with Jake!

Anonymous said...

Damn, we can't see the person having brunch with Jake!

It would seem a woman of small stature, but I am not sure.

Anonymous said...

Person having brunch with Jake = sitting opposite him, in green/blue t-shirt or sweater?

Anonymous said...

My sister had brunch in NYC

When, we need to know when! lol

Anonymous said...

Person having brunch with Jake = sitting opposite him, in green/blue t-shirt or sweater?

It seems a woman with the turquoise shirt with the black hair, but could be the hair of the person with the grey shirt.Not sure.

Anonymous said...

When, we need to know when! lol
Sunday March 18 th

Anonymous said...

Thanks 9:48 AM!

Anonymous said...

It seems a woman with the turquoise shirt with the black hair...

Good! As long as it isn't blue hair... :)

Anonymous said...

Lea doesn't have the blue hair anymore, she has dyed thehair of black for the Premier of the Film with D.Kruger.

10:31 AM said...

PS However Lea's hair are short, and obviously the person in the photo is not Lea Seydox.

Anonymous said...

I see, thanks. Anyway, no reason to believe that Lea is in New York.

Anonymous said...

No, I don't think Lea is in New York.

Anonymous said...

I'm sure we will see Lea back in NYC soon. Jake going to Paris after the Berlin festival and her coming to spend a few days in NYC with him seems as though they have something going on. Perhaps Jake is trying to get to know her so that he's more comfortable in their public appearances together. I absolutely believe that Jake will beard again.

Anonymous said...

"her coming to spend a few days in NYC with him"

Huh?!? When did that happen?
I'm sure you don't know why Lea visited US / New York.

PR said...

I absolutely believe that Jake will beard again.

As sure as night follows day!

Anonymous said...

It is enough obvious or at least enough probable that Lea was in NY for Jake, for what motive we don't know , but she was in the mean of the workmanship of a movie and she was in ny for the weekend, plus two days later she had the premier of the fim in Paris, it was not logical or convenient to go to NY.

Anonymous said...

It is enough obvious or at least enough probable that Lea was in NY for Jake

No, it isn't.
Lea with blue hair = Lea was filming.
Jake is and was free as a bird.
Why would Lea travel to New York to see Jake when Jake can travel and meet her in Europe?

Anonymous said...

It is not a valid matter, million of motives could have pushed Lea to go her to NY, instead that Jake to Paris but personally I would exclude working motives.the behavior of the people is not always dictated from the logic or from that to us (what we don't know anything of them) it seems logical.

Anonymous said...

She's not filming yet. End of month, beginning of next month. The blue hair so early before filming is most likely for test shots. It was still blue at her premiere last week but with a dark rinse over it.

Black on blue

Anonymous said...

"but personally I would exclude working motives"

Just because you don't like them!

Anonymous said...

"She's not filming yet."

Based on what? Your wishful thinking?

Anonymous said...

the behavior of the people is not always dictated from the logic

Sorry, we aren't discussing emotions or intuition or anything like that.

The point is that you can't explain why Jake doesn't care about being with Lea if they are in relationship.

Anonymous said...

No the workmanship of the film starts the first days of March.

Anonymous said...

The point is that you can't explain why Jake doesn't care about being with Lea if they are in relationship.

No I cannot explain it, because I don't personally know them, as I don't know the motives that push them to do what they does, as I cannot explain because Jake has gone to Paris with her, or because that night in Berlin they have disappeared together in the night, we don't know anything, but we can say that for two people that live in different continents their meetings they have become at least more assiduous.

Anonymous said...

There is only one reason for Lea to have blue hair and that reason is filming movie where she has blue hair. That means that she visited New York after filming started.

If you have info about filming dates, you should post link - wishful thinking isn't enough.

Anonymous said...

No I cannot explain it, because I don't personally know them

LOL!!!

Why are you playing stupid? :)

You don't need to know people personally to KNOW that people in girlfriend-boyfriend relationship care about being together, spending time together.

Anonymous said...

LOL!!!

Why are you playing stupid? :)

You don't need to know people personally to KNOW that people in girlfriend-boyfriend relationship care about being together, spending time together.

life is more complicated than as you you represent it, unfortunately.

Anonymous said...

Bullshit x 100.

You use "Jake has gone to Paris with her" as an argumet for "Jake and Lea are in a relationship" opinion. You like that part, you don't have "I don't personally know them" problem with that part.

You can't explain why Jake doesn't five a fuck about being with Lea in Europe while she's working there, so you don't like that part and you suddenly have "I don't personally know them" problem.

So transparent.

Anonymous said...

There is not a part of this history that I like, or a part that I don't like, I don't know if among them there is a relationship or that type of relationship is, I don't know anything of them I can make only conjectures as you, but to difference your self I don't pretend that my opinions are the Gospel

Anonymous said...

There is not a part of this history that I like, or a part that I don't like

Oh really? You forgot that we can read your previous comments? :)

Anonymous said...

Oh really? You forgot that we can read your previous comments? :)

Then I don't have need to repeat it:)

Anonymous said...

No need to repeat it, just to admit what you really think / believe :)

Anonymous said...

I have done it around a million times, as it is visible from all of my comments:)

12:03 PM said...

Yes, it is visible, but you still deny it - 11:46 AM comment, for example.

Anonymous said...

You read only what you want to read;),I think I am very clear in my thought, and I don't deny anything, because there is no anything to deny, the comment to which you report (11.46), it says what I have repeated in the whole conversation,: " we don't know anything, we don't personally know them, everything is possible, it is true that Jake doesn't go to Paris to lea while he is not working, as it is true that Lea was working and it didn't have motive to be to ny, it is true that the people in relationship has generally try to be together the more possible, but it is also true that to Paris and Berlin they were together. Because? I DON'T KNOW IT AND NOT EVEN YOU :)

Anonymous said...

I call that bullshiting.

Anonymous said...

Bullshiting is a nice word for the way 12:54 PM "discusses" things.

Anonymous said...

Sorry 12:54 PM, but I can't say anything nice about people who don't have the balls to speak their minds about trivial things like gossip and celebrity speculations.

I see your "clever talk" as bad manners because you care about your agenda more than discussing things.

12:59 PM said...

Sorry 12:54 PM, but I can't say anything nice about people who don't have the balls to speak their minds about trivial things like gossip and celebrity speculations.

I see your "clever talk" as bad manners because you care about your agenda more than discussing things.

Anonymous said...

Kechiche pronto a girare Le bleu est une couleur chaude
di Fabien Lemercier

23/02/2012 - Cominceranno i primi di marzo le riprese del nuovo film di Abdelatif Kechiche, Le bleu est une couleur chaude, adattamento dell'omonimo fumetto di Julie Maroh. Nel cast figurano l'astro nascente Léa Seydoux (foto - Les Adieux à la reine [trailer, film focus], L’enfant d’en haut [trailer]) e Adèle Exarchopoulos (rivelatasi in Les enfants de Timpelbach [trailer] e vista, fra l'altro, in Tête de Turc ETC...

Prodotto in delegato da Quat’sous Films (società del regista) e da Wild Bunch, Le bleu est une couleur chaude beneficia di un budget di 3,98 M€ che include le coproduzioni di France 2 Cinéma, dei belgi di Scope Pictures e degli spagnoli di Vertigo Films, 560 000 euro di sostegno di Eurimages e 175 000 euro del CRRAV. Le riprese si svolgeranno nella regione Nord-Pas-de-Calais e a Parigi. Wild Bunch si occuperà della distribuzione in Francia e delle vendite internazionali.

http://www.cineuropa.org/2011/nw.aspx?t=newsdetail&l=it&did=216536

Kechiche ready to film Le bleu est une couleur chaude

23/02/2012 - the first days of March will start the resumptions of the new film of Abdelatif Kechiche, Le bleu east a couleur chaude, adaptation of the homonym comic strip of Julie Maroh. In the cast they show up the dawning star Léa Seydoux (photo - Les Adieux à the reine [trailer, film focus], The enfant of en haut [trailer]) and Adèle Exarchopoulos (revealed him in Les enfants de Timpelbach [trailer] and sight, among the other, in Tête de Turc [trailer]). etc...

produced in delegated by Quat'sous Films (the director's society) and from Wild Bunch, Her east bleu a couleurs chaude profits of a budget of 3,98 M€s that includes the co-productions of France 2 Cinéma, of the Belgians of Brooms Pictures and of the Spaniards of Vertigo Films, 560 000 European of support of Eurimages and 175 000 European of the CRRAV. The resumptions will develop him in the region North-Pas-de-Calais and to Paris. Wild Bunch will deal him with the distribution in France and of the international sales.

SORRY FOR BAD TRANSLATION:)

Anonymous said...

I don't want to quarrel or to offend anybody and I don't want me to be offended I am clear in what I say and I think, not to be is necessary in accord between us to discuss, and it is not nice to accuse someone not to have courage, when I am here to say my opinion that is contrary to the thought of almost all the blog.

Anonymous said...

"Begin in early March filming the new movie Abdelatif Kechiche, The bleu est une couleur chaude, adapted from the comic Julie Maroh. The cast includes rising star Léa Seydoux ... Filming will take place in the region Nord-Pas-de-Calais and Paris."

Just as we thought:

1. Lea is filming since the begining of March = she was still filming this movie when she was seen in New York with Jake, March 11
2. Lea is filming in France.

Anonymous said...

I am clear in what I say and I think

You are not clear at all - in fact, it looks like you are unclear on purpose when you can't prove your point.

You are free to think and believe what you want, just please stop playing stupid.

Anonymous said...

You are not clear at all - in fact, it looks like you are unclear on purpose when you can't prove your point.

I don't have a point to explain, I know too much few on this matter to have a " point" my thought is that Lea was to NY for Jake, but I doesn't know why, that's all.

Anonymous said...

I don't understand how that works. You don't know nothing for sure and you can't form an opinion without having all facts - how do you manage to function in real life?

Anonymous said...

Cristal G ‏ @_cristallll
I just met other boyfriend jake gyllenhaal😍😍
ny

Anonymous said...

I just met other boyfriend jake gyllenhaal😍😍
ny

what does it mean?

Anonymous said...

I don't understand how that works. You don't know nothing for sure and you can't form an opinion without having all facts - how do you manage to function in real life?

Well enough I would say, surely I make some errors, but as all in the life, it doesn't seem me wrong to know the facts before forming an opinion.
:)

Anonymous said...

Eliza Thornberry ‏ @kahreeen
I think I just saw jake gyllenhaal walk into sur la table. We locked eyes across the street. Nothing will ever compare.

NY now:)

Anonymous said...

but as all in the life, it doesn't seem me wrong to know the facts before forming an opinion

You can't live normal life like that because in many real life cases you can't know the facts before you have to form an opinion and make a decision.

And that is the reason I don't believe your "I don't have a point to explain".

Anonymous said...

You are able not to believe me, it is in your full right, but this is the truth, I try to have to the life and the things an approach Zen.

Anonymous said...

The truth? So you never dated anyone?

Anonymous said...

Yes of course I have dated different people in my life,perhaps I have not understood the sense of your sentence.

Anonymous said...

The point is that you, like most people, have no problem forming an opinion without having the facts.

Some of people you dated could have been murderers, but you didn't check out police records before dating them, didn't care about that possibility because your opinion was good enough without having all important facts.

Anonymous said...

Bfore dating someone I try to understand who is and it is a thing that I recommend to everybody to do:), a thing it is to form an opinion on someone whom you personally know and with which you speak live you eat you sleep and you share experiences, another thing is to have an opinion and to introduce it as a dogma on the celebrities that I don't know and I will never know, and I don't know anything of their lives taste experiences and characters.

Anonymous said...

to introduce it as a dogma on the celebrities

Oops, your agenda is showing!

BTW, that is a lie - "Jake is gay" isn't dogma.
Believe what you want, but don't you dare trashing people who don't agree with your opinion.

Anonymous said...

another thing is to have an opinion and to introduce it as a dogma on the celebrities

Your homophobia is disgusting.

Anonymous said...

Your technique to isolate a sentence to diminish the whole discourse, is by now clearand a little old, I recommend you to invent something new ;) you accuse me of having an agenda to hide or to diminish the fact that you have one:), with dogma I intended Lea it is not to NY for Jake.

Anonymous said...

3:19 PM, what are you talking about?!? Do you know what word "dogma" means? Please check it out and stop lying.

Anonymous said...

I am not homophob and I don't allow you to offend me the this way, it is your ignorance and rudeness and being disgusting, been ashamed to use certain epithets.

Anonymous said...

to introduce it as a dogma on the celebrities

What is "dogma" you're talking about?

Anonymous said...

3:19 PM, what are you talking about?!? Do you know what word "dogma" means? Please check it out and stop lying.

When you become so aggressive it is because you are in difficulty, I know what a dogma is, it is a word Greek Latin, from which my language almost entirely derives, so much that even if it is one "dead language" we still study it to school, but colloquially can be used for someone whom doesn't admit that another truth exists besides his, that introduces exactly as a dogma.

Anonymous said...

What is "dogma" you're talking about?

Anonymous said...

Lea was not in NY for Jake,Jake it was not in Paris for Lea, and only because it doesn't coincide with yours of Agenda, but while I am not sure of nothing you seem sure of everything.

Anonymous said...

used for someone whom doesn't admit that another truth exists besides his, that introduces exactly as a dogma

So what dogma has to do with Jake ans Lea discussion?

If you READ comments, you will see that no one claimed to know the truth and that different opinion was always explained.

Anonymous said...

Lea was not in NY for Jake,Jake it was not in Paris for Lea, and only because it doesn't coincide with yours of Agenda, but while I am not sure of nothing you seem sure of everything.

What about your agenda and hiding behind "I am not sure of nothing"?

Aren't you ashamed to pretend like that? You should be.
And you should be ashamed for implaying that being gay is a bad thing.

Anonymous said...

If you READ comments, you will see that no one claimed to know the truth and that different opinion was always explained.


She's not filming yet. End of month, beginning of next month. The blue hair so early before filming is most likely for test shots. It was still blue at her premiere last week but with a dark rinse over it.

Black on blue

March 20, 2012 11:19 AM

Anonymous said...

Aren't you ashamed to pretend like that? You should be.
And you should be ashamed for implaying that being gay is a bad thing.

This sentence is too much fool and untrustworthy to deserve an answer, because you live in the pretense it doesn't mean that all do as you. I am not sure indeed of nothing and I don't have need to fake nothing, contrarily of you that you are frightened to death that your truth falls as a castle of papers.

Anonymous said...

She's not filming yet.

What?!??!?!?

Today is March 20.
This is March.
Lea is filming since the beginning of THIS month.

"Begin in early March filming the new movie Abdelatif Kechiche..."
Article is from February - 23/02/2012
http://www.cineuropa.org/2011/nw.aspx?t=newsdetail&l=it&did=216536

Anonymous said...

I am not sure indeed of nothing and I don't have need to fake nothing, contrarily of you that you are frightened to death that your truth falls as a castle of papers.

LOL!

You are homophobic, clueless and lying fangirl.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
3:58 PM said...

Ha, showing your TRUE, TROLL face!

Thank you for proving me right!!! :)

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

I apologize if I have used not kind words, it is not what I think of this blog of the people that write here, but I have been offended and I have reacted.

Anonymous said...

Seems to me it's just one person being overly mean and nasty post after post today. What's your agenda oh angry one?

Anonymous said...

What are you talkig about 4:48 PM?

Anonymous said...

I have been offended and I have reacted

Try posting arguments which will support your opinion and don't insult people who believe Jake is gay on JiG blog if you don't like being called fangirl and homophobe.

Anonymous said...

I have been offended for first, and I have reacted, I don't want to insult anybody and I have been wrong in the reaction, however I always try to deduce my thoughts and opinions, I always try to be kind, but it always ends that someone calls me stupid fangurl or troll.And I Am not Neither The one Neither The other Thing.my question is. Are you prepared, to also accept divergent opinions?

Anonymous said...

Are you prepared, to also accept divergent opinions?

Are you ready to state your opinion? Because so far you are doing your best to hide it.

Why should people accept your or anyone else's opinion?
Will you accept my opinion?
Where are comments on WFT2 where people are asking other people to change their opinion or accept one particular opinion?

Anonymous said...

I would never like to change the opinions of anybody and I am always ready to listen and to discuss everything, also the theories of OMG,Would not I ever like to change the opinions of anybody and I am always ready to listen and to discuss everything, also the theories of OMG, because I should hide my opinion? If my opinion is not you clear, it is not my guilt. what is there of not clear in to say : according to me Lea was in NY for Jake, but I doesn't know the motive, perhaps a new beard is upcoming, or perhaps they are great friends or she is magic and has turned him into etero, or she is its great love, I don't know t, and it would not be honest to declare that I know everything and I have understood everything if it is not true, at least for me.

Anonymous said...

You if great 5:55 and you have expressed in full my thought. power of the synthesis and intelligence.

Anonymous said...

* you are great 5:55 and you have expressed in full my thought. power of the synthesis and intelligence.

this is not OMG said...

Are you prepared, to also accept divergent opinions?

I think you are missing the point.

Your and everyone else's opinion and speculation will be questioned by people who don't agree with you.

That is how it should be.

The goal is to find the truth, not to support someone's opinion.

So everyone should be prepared to post arguments and explain why he/she believes what she believes - that is the point of sharing info and discussing different possibilities.

Anonymous said...

So everyone should be prepared to post arguments and explain why he/she believes what she believes - that is the point of sharing info and discussing different possibilities.

More then correct, but when I try I am called fangurl or troll and instead I am alone to the search of the truth.

Anonymous said...

Let's start with simple facts.

"She's not filming yet. End of month, beginning of next month."

We know that is not true (see posted article) - why can't you admit simple mistake?

Anonymous said...

Let's start with simple facts.

"She's not filming yet. End of month, beginning of next month."

We know that is not true (see posted article) - why can't you admit simple mistake?

to whom is the question turned?

6:21 PM said...

Question is for 6:11 PM because I presume he/she posted "She's not filming yet. End of month, beginning of next month.".

Anonymous said...

You are wrong , because I am me the person that has posted the article, that if you notice it is in Italian, I have posted it and translated.

Anonymous said...

OK.

Why are you pretending that you don't have an opinion about Jake or Jake and Lea?

Anonymous said...

I don't fake not to have an opinion, for me it is impossible to form an opinion worthy of this name, having so few elements on which to found it.

Anonymous said...

About Jake I have to admit that my opinion almost daily changes, I am not sure of whom and what he is, and therefore I look for, I ask questions post information as all you I think.However I think that it is correct to try to say onlythe truth end not what it would like

Anonymous said...

I don't fake not to have an opinion

Sorry, don't believe that after your comments like this one:

"It is not a valid matter, million of motives could have pushed Lea to go her to NY, instead that Jake to Paris but personally I would exclude working motives."

Anonymous said...

So? , there can be million of non working motives to be in NY, her best friend perhaps works in NY,or her brother or her parents were in trip to NY, but as I have said thousand times, for me the motive for which Lea was in NY is Jake, but I doesn't know why.

Anonymous said...

Leah Benitez ‏ @LDBsays
Walked pass Jake Gyllenhaal by work-so low key and tiny for a guy!

how can I translate low key?

Anonymous said...

So your "I don't have an opinion" is selective: you "don't have an opinion" only about things which don't support your wishful thinking.

Anonymous said...

So your "I don't have an opinion" is selective: you "don't have an opinion" only about things which don't support your wishful thinking.

Are we on this again? ok I'm done, I don't have desires in subject, only curiosity. can you say the same?

Anonymous said...

low key - someone who doesn't stand out, ordinary looking

Anonymous said...

low key - someone who doesn't stand out, ordinary looking

Oh thanks, not a good thing however :)

Anonymous said...

What is the problem with Lea ? It's a free world , she can go wherever she wants to .

Anonymous said...

I don't have desires in subject, only curiosity.

Sorry, your comments are there, they are speaking for themselves.

7:29 PM said...

Sorry, your comments are there, they are speaking for themselves.

i really hope so!

Anonymous said...

I don't have desires in subject, only curiosity. can you say the same?

That's a reason to call you silly, homophobic fangirl.

Anonymous said...

I don't have desires in subject

Of course you don't!
Only gay people want Jake to be gay!
Fangirls don't want Jake to be straight!
LOL

Anonymous said...

I don't want that Jake is nothing different from what he is really, once more. can you say the same?

Anonymous said...

Only gay people want Jake to be gay!

Yes, gays are bad like that, LOL :)

Anonymous said...

I don't want that Jake is nothing different from what he is really, once more. can you say the same?

For God's sake, please stop insulting fans who believe that Jake is gay or people who don't agree with you.

Anonymous said...

If you feel yourself insulted by the different opinions you should close yourself in a room and to stop communicating with the rest of the world, where bad people that don't agree with you

Anonymous said...

8:04 PM - Your 7:55 PM comment is NOT about different opinions, it is old and stupid fangirl theory that fans who believe Jake is gay believe that because they want him to be gay.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

I have never said that Jake is not gay, I have said that I don't know who or what he is, and that I change idea almost every day, and I also think that it is true that the fans Heteros of Jake want hopelessly that he is Hetero, but it is a discourse to speculate, because the fans gay of Jake want hopelessly that he is gay, and to depart from these preconceptions doesn't help in the search of the truth, I think that it needs to have the free head from the personal desires and to look at the facts.

Anonymous said...

Stupid trolly,

still nothing better to do with your time? :)

Anonymous said...

because the fans gay of Jake want hopelessly that he is gay

You are projecting. Just because you want Jake to be straight that doesn't mean that other people want him to be something.

Anonymous said...

again with the tactic to isolate a sentence for not to face the whole discourse, sorry but this is childish,
I repeat you for the last time that I don't want that Jake is nothing different from what is.
He is hetero, it is ok with me
he is gay, it is ok with me
he is bi it is ok with me.

CAN YOU SAY THE SAME?

Anonymous said...

I repeat you for the last time that I don't want that Jake is nothing different from what is.
I've read your comments - based on them that is not true.

CAN YOU SAY THE SAME?
Please stop suggesting that I want Jake to be something just because I believe Jake is gay - I'm sure you are not saying that to fans who believe that Jake is straight.
I'm a fan who's interested in truth about his sexuality.

Anonymous said...

- I'm sure you are not saying that to fans who believe that Jake is straight.

I have never said that Jake is not gay, I have said that I don't know who or what he is, and that I change idea almost every day, and I also think that it is true that the fans Heteros of Jake want hopelessly that he is Hetero, but it is a discourse to speculate, because the fans gay of Jake want hopelessly that he is gay, and to depart from these preconceptions doesn't help in the search of the truth, I think that it needs to have the free head from the personal desires and to look at the facts.

CAN YOU READ?

Anonymous said...

Yes, I can read, unfortunately you don't understand or you are pretending not to understand.

Anonymous said...

what is there to understand? You have accused me of not saying the same things on the fans that want that Jake is hetero and I have shown you that it is not true

Anonymous said...

Alec ‏ @alecburch
Followed Jake Gyllenhaal around soho for a while today. #truestory

Anonymous said...

8:41 PM - you can't undo your comments.

I've explained more than once why I think that your comments are proof of your "wish Jake is straight" thinking. I'm not going to explain the same all over again.

Anonymous said...

I don't even want to annul or to hide my comments, they are public really because people read them, and what I think is also enough clear for a blind to this point.

Anonymous said...

What's On...? ‏ @WhatsOnTGP
Minetta Tavern for the Black Label Burger and Jake Gyllenhaal for dessert! nyc

New York said...

Emily Berkowitz ‏ @EmilyBerkow
Love #ColombaTorrefaction, was just sippin coffee nxt to Jake Gyllenhaal!
2m ago

Anonymous said...

MBH ‏ @mfromthesfbay New York
Saw Jake Gyllenhaal at Minetta Tavern tonight when I was at dinner...
12h ago

Anonymous said...

Dinner and then coffee in the morning - Jake needs New York apartment just to keep his stuff and sleep.

Anonymous said...

Emily Berkowitz ‏ @EmilyBerkow
Love @LaColombeCoffee in tribeca, was sippin coffee nxt to #JakeGyllenhaal this AM!
1h ago

Michelle Williams spending time with Jason Segel? said...

16 March 2012

HollywoodNews.com: Hollywood may have a new, somewhat odd, couple on their hands as it is rumored that Michelle Williams was recently spotted out having fun with Jason Segel.

The two allegedly hung out for about four hours at Chateau Marmont where they were reportedly spotted laughing the night away, states UsMagazine.com. Eventually, Williams’ friend and Segel’s former ‘Freaks and Geeks’ costar Busy Philipps joined the two for a short bit.

Anonymous said...

Darlene Sterner ‏ @DarleneSterner
Spotted on the Subway: Jake Gyllenhaal, Umm... He is doing what? Saying hi, I love you to me, yea! I'm his Bride~~~~to be engaged.

Anonymous said...

Darlene Fangirl Sterner ‏:)

Anonymous said...

Heidi Hilson ‏ @idieh_
OH MY GOD JAKE GYLLENHAAL AND DANIEL RADCLIFFE ARE JEWISH I feel cool again!
7m ago

LOL said...

Ulises Castrejón ‏ @ucastrejon
Si Arnold Schwarzenegger y Maggie Gyllenhaal tuvieran un hijo, nadie podría citarlo sin la ayuda de Google.

If Arnold Schwarzenegger and Maggie Gyllenhaal had a son, no one could quote him without the help of Google.

Ted said...

Dear Ted:
It seems Toothy Tile has kind off disappeared! Does he have a major film coming out in 2012? And what did you think of Crotch-uh-lastic's last movie?
—Jesusson

Dear Guess Who's Back:
Yes, Toothy has new projects in the mix, so prepare yourselves for some deliciously Vicey behavior in the very near future (expect some Vice action, like, this Friday!). And I actually enjoyed Crotch's last film. Not sure about his par-tick performance, but I guess he held his own since no one really called him out for it. A rare feat for Crotch to accomplish, if I dare say so.

Anonymous said...

Toothy has new projects in the mix, so prepare yourselves for some deliciously Vicey behavior in the very near future

Jake has new projects so ther will be new Blind Item?

Jake had sex with producers (again)?

Anonymous said...

^^ Blind Vice

Anonymous said...

Jake had sex with producers (again)?

Or looking for a beard for new movie promotion.

Anonymous said...

Jake had sex with producers (again)?

When?

Anonymous said...

so prepare yourselves for some deliciously Vicey behavior in the very near future

WOW Ted even knows what Jake will do in the future. His sources must have crystal balls!

Anonymous said...

Jake had sex with producers (again)?
When?


2006, for Prince of Persia.

Ted said...

His sources must have crystal balls!

I have big balls!

Anonymous said...

2006, for Prince of Persia.

wow,w/JB?

WTF!? said...

WongLong ‏ @WongLong2
@BearGrylls, In China today, see a message that Jake Gyllenhaal will replace your to record "Man vs Wild", is true? we don't want lose you

Anonymous said...

Why WTF? Jake is the right man for the job! :)

Anonymous said...

wow,w/JB?

You'll have to ask Ted about names, but I remember Jerry Bruckheimer being very impressed by Jake's abs :)

Anonymous said...

Ted is a full of shit liar.

Anonymous said...

Toothy Tile having sex with bigwigs blind vice is from 2006, I think from October, and in that vice Ted gave good description of Prince of Persia movie - Jake doing Prince of Persia was announced 1,5 years later, in May 2008.

How did Ted know about PoP? Lucky guess? Did Jake use casting couch to get PoP role?

Anonymous said...

October 19, 2006

That Toothy Tile. He just lives to push the fagola envelope, love that about the young acting hunk! (And I know you do, too.)

Now, quite frankly, T2's latest man-on-man moves far outshine his recent movie choices; though, that's an arguable statement at best—I just don't go fer this hetero image Mr. T. is busy trying to push over on his ever loyal, hapless, ticket-buying fans.

But we'll just leave that li'l bit o' politically incorrect poo-pooing and get straight, as it were, to the attempted wild sex in the back of the limousine, 'kay? Thought you might agree...

Oh, gawd, I am getting old. I'm confusing all these closeted fruits into one big ass-banging aspic! So, sorry. It was Jiggly Wiggle-Poof who pounced—quite stupidly, I might add—on his so-not-gay limo driver while out promoting his supersuccessful boob-tube show in some hick state. And let's just say what went down was not at all what Jiggly had in mind (something bruised, not blushing).

Also, there's hope, I want you all to know, for Mr. Tile's movie career. Dare I say some of his future film projects are looking up, because, uh, how can I put this? T.T. has decided to start sleeping with better-looking people now to get his future projects—is that being too crass about it all?

In other words, for T.T.'s next 40-foot-wide job, Tooth-doll not only seduced the man who would decide the whole-deal shebang (it's sort of a studly adventure story, in so many ways), he now shares cocaine, hotel suites and party favors with the bigwig. Isn't that sweet when one can stay bestest amigos with one's ladder-climbing bed partners?

Warms my jaded-ass heart.

And it ain’t: Danny Bonaduce, Isaiah Washington, Josh Duhamel

Anonymous said...

one more time Ted ia a full of shit liar.

Anonymous said...

one more time Ted ia a full of shit liar

Please explain how Ted knew about PoP - "it's sort of a studly adventure story, in so many ways" - 1,5 years before Jake doing PoP was announced?

Anonymous said...

Jake was not the first choice for Pop, Orlando Bloom, was the first choice.

Anonymous said...

As everybody in Holliwood knew that it was in project a movie on the famous Video game.

Anonymous said...

Orlando Bloom, was the first choice

1. that is just a rumor, not info.
2. even if that's true, it only means that Jake had sex with the right people, lol.

Anonymous said...

As everybody in Holliwood knew that it was in project a movie on the famous Video game.

And in 2006 only Ted Casablanca knew that Jake will get the role.

Anonymous said...

it is not a rumor, Orlando Bloom has declared to have refused the role in the summer 2008 if I am not wrong.

Anonymous said...

Well alot of good it did Jake to sleep with Jerry Bruckheimer (supposedly). Not only is Jerry creepy looking, but Jake also sold his soul to Disney for 2years. And what a favor those 2 years did for him. Unbelievable and miserable bearding with the Chin, a movie that bombed on the first weekend and such tabloid overexposure that to this day Jake is more known as Reese's ex than a movie star. That was a real career moving decision.

Anonymous said...

It was just a rumor, probably planted by Orlando's PR - or Orlando's IMDb fans (read it there first).

Anonymous said...

no it was not a rumor, Orlando Bloom was the first choice, now I look for the article and I post it

Anonymous said...

Orlando Bloom was the first choice

What that has to do with Toothy Tile having sex for PoP?!?

not 8:10 AM said...

Orlando Bloom was the first choice
What that has to do with Toothy Tile having sex for PoP?!?


Nothing.

Anonymous said...

Orlando Bloom was the first choice

What that has to do with Toothy Tile having sex for PoP?!?

Boys everything is possible, but why a hot talented actor as Jake it would need to sleep with JB to have a role, in 2006 then to the apex of his career? . it doesn't look as Jake for me

Ted said bigwig said...

JB is BIG producer, but not the only one who makes decisions.

Anonymous said...

. I have made a search, and the actor for Pop it seems has been select almost to the last minute, among a team of competitors among which Orlando and even Zac Efron.

Anonymous said...

why a hot talented actor as Jake it would need to sleep with JB to have a role, in 2006 then to the apex of his career

1. to become a movie star
2. Jake has competition in Hollywood.

Anonymous said...

I have made a search, and the actor for Pop it seems has been select almost to the last minute, among a team of competitors among which Orlando and even Zac Efron.

Like I've said - Orlando was just a rumor, there is no official info, no confirmation and no denial.

Anonymous said...

It seems that Jerry B is straight and married whit Linda.

Anonymous said...

Could have been someone else, not JB.

Anonymous said...

Ha ok.

Anonymous said...

However it was really the idea of the film to be a failure, also J Carter that it is practically the same movie with a different actor it is a gigantic bomb, therefore it was not guilt of Jake.

Anonymous said...

Some other actor might have done a better job, but I do agree that bad BO wasn't Jake's fault - people don't watch movies like PoP for leading actor.

Anonymous said...

For me Jake has done a great job with the film. what did it have to do more? according to me it is the movie that was born old

Anonymous said...

More charisma, self-irony, I don't know :)

Anonymous said...

Like Jhonny Depp in Pirates?

Anonymous said...

BTW Ted remains a liar, remember digital dance?

Anonymous said...

Life and world isn't black and white.
I'm sure Ted made up BT and Jake and Austin still being together, but I have only one explanation for Ted knowing about Jake and PoP.

Anonymous said...

Ted didn't even know about Reese to the beginning, and he has denied up to the last one, saying things like, I don't believe it up to when I don't see the photos.

Anonymous said...

9:39 AM - so? Ted can't out Jake Gyllenhaal, we are talking about Toothy Tile vices.

Anonymous said...

Ellie Dominguez ‏ @guez_what
Breakfast with parents of Jake & Maggie Gyllenhaal #nbd

6 min ago

Anonymous said...

9:39 AM - so? Ted can't out Jake Gyllenhaal, we are talking about Toothy Tile vices.

It is a few strange that Ted didn't know that its most famous character was in "negotiations" with an actress A- lister oscar prize and his costar Ted not was forced to use the true names to speak of it, could use as usual nicknames and games of words.

Anonymous said...

Even Ted in that days said that Reese and Ryan were in negotiations to back together.

Anonymous said...

10:03 AM - that is NOT true.

Anonymous said...

OH Darling yes is true

Anonymous said...

No, it isn't true - it is just something trolls made up to trash Ted, like they did then in 2007.

Anonymous said...

It is a few strange that Ted didn't know that its most famous character was in "negotiations"

What's strange about it?

How do you imagine that gossip world works?

Anonymous said...

Are you crazy?t looks for it in the TT file of this blog, any troll unless Ted is the king of trolls

«Oldest ‹Older   3401 – 3600 of 3719   Newer› Newest»