Saturday, 22 October 2011

Simply Not Enough

Zachary Quinto
Zachary Quinto


10.16.11.
nyc...

when i found out that jamey rodemeyer killed himself - i felt deeply troubled. but when i found out that jamey rodemeyer had made an it gets better video only months before taking his own life - i felt indescribable despair. i also made an it gets better video last year - in the wake of the senseless and tragic gay teen suicides that were sweeping the nation at the time. but in light of jamey's death - it became clear to me in an instant that living a gay life without publicly acknowledging it - is simply not enough to make any significant contribution to the immense work that lies ahead on the road to complete equality. our society needs to recognize the unstoppable momentum toward unequivocal civil equality for every gay lesbian bisexual and transgendered citizen of this country. gay kids need to stop killing themselves because they are made to feel worthless by cruel and relentless bullying. parents need to teach their children principles of respect and acceptance. we are witnessing an enormous shift of collective consciousness throughout the world. we are at the precipice of great transformation within our culture and government. i believe in the power of intention to change the landscape of our society - and it is my intention to live an authentic life of compassion and integrity and action. jamey rodemeyer's life changed mine. and while his death only makes me wish that i had done this sooner - i am eternally grateful to him for being the catalyst for change within me. now i can only hope to serve as the same catalyst for even one other person in this world. that - i believe - is all that we can ask of ourselves and of each other.

zq.

Source: www.zacharyquinto.com

3,560 comments:

1 – 200 of 3560   Newer›   Newest»
Jackie said...

@
@ Previous post's comments
@

ZQ said...

Needs to be repeated for all closeted gays in so called "glass closet":

but in light of jamey's death - it became clear to me in an instant that living a gay life without publicly acknowledging it - is simply not enough to make any significant contribution to the immense work that lies ahead on the road to complete equality.

Anonymous said...

Whoever did went to a lot of trouble, I suspect they had a "deadline" and forgot about getting rid of that.

What do you mean?


I think it means that someone is desperate to sell "Jake posing as Grace Jones photo is photoshopped".

Anonymous said...

I don't know boyz for me that photo it's as false as the" love" with Tylor Swift

Anonymous said...

I didn't realize where this entire quote came from - I thought it was from an interview. Zachary is a wonderful person.

Anonymous said...

Wait a moment! do you want to say that someone has voluntarily made the fotoshop, so that Jake could say that it was not true?

Anonymous said...

I think that person who leaked Jake's Grace Jones photo has other (more incriminating?) Jake's photos so Jake used his lawyers to send him a message "don't publish them or it's going to cost you".
That's the only scenario I can think off that would explain Jake using lawyers for some silly photo.

Anonymous said...

Zachary is a wonderful person.

Yes, he sounds like a wonderful person, hope his career won't suffer because of being openly gay.

Anonymous said...

But do you think indeed that the photo is true? I have shown her/it to one friend of mine, enough experienced and he has told that it was a clear example of fotoshop even succeeded not so much good

Anonymous said...

That's the only scenario I can think off that would explain Jake using lawyers for some silly photo.

That would also explain why Jake was perfectly fine with this fake photo, published before Grace Jones photo.

Anonymous said...

1:09 PM - I'm not photoshop expert, but Jake using lawyers and trying to force sites to take that photo down is very strange, something is fishy with that photo.

Anonymous said...

TheeDominizle Dominy
Incredible week - met Jesse Jackson, had a gd conversation with Jake Gyllenhall, saw NY from top of a roof & all with a wonderful man!
3 hours ago

http://twitter.com/#!/TheeDominizleBrooklyn, NY
Creative Writer, Youth Development Worker, A&R, Radio Presenter and Music Event Hostess! Currently carrying out a research project... www.dominizle.blogspot.com

Anonymous said...

Grace Jones photo has been published during, the promotion / gone out of Source Code, and I believe that Jake aimed a lot at this movie to relaunch his career, he didn't perhaps want other buzz gay that could damage his image of leadmen of sci-fi

Anonymous said...

Grace Jones photo has been published during, the promotion / gone out of Source Code

Not true. "Source Code" was released on April 1 in US and Grace Jones photo was published 6 weeks later, May 14.

those were the times! said...

Pezerk Pezerk
@nan_o_monster @tchalla7 @tedj0n I'm game for jogging together with Armstrong, McConaughey and Gyllenhall #brostrong
2 hours ago

Anonymous said...

Yes, he sounds like a wonderful person, hope his career won't suffer because of being openly gay.

I don't think it will -

He is gorgeous, those strong brows and eyes are really something. :)

Anonymous said...

Not true. "Source Code" was released on April 1 in US and Grace Jones photo was published 6 weeks later, May 14.

Are you sure? to me it seems that has been published before, I remember to have thought: how will it influence the film? however I am not sure

Anonymous said...

justapieceofsky Jesse Rabbits
Just saw Jake Gyllenhaal on the street in midtown! Oh, I love New York...
19 hours ago

Anonymous said...

Not true. "Source Code" was released on April 1 in US and Grace Jones photo was published 6 weeks later, May 14.

yes is true I have checked you are right sorry:)

Anonymous said...

Are you sure?

Yes.

http://www.dlisted.com/2011/05/15/eat-your-everything-out-grace-jones

^^ said...

Michael K is hilarious :)

Anonymous said...

Michael K is hilarious :)

Why?

Anonymous said...

yes is true I have checked

So what's your opinion, why did Jake use lawyers for that fake/real Grace Jones photo?

Anonymous said...

Michael K is hilarious :)
Why?


Because he doesn't give a shit, he writes what he wants.

Anonymous said...

daniokeefe Danielle O'Keefe
Jake gyllenhaal spotted on 21st about to take spin class no big deal http://pic.twitter.com/0ueVmLtW
21 Oct

Anonymous said...

stayC_lassy Stacy Mammen
Jake Gyllenhaal sighting at brunch. Maybe Brooklyn isn't so bad.
2 minutes ago

Anonymous said...

to 1:42 PM

For me the photo is clearly false, and the film was doing well and it had to still have released to a large extent of the world, perhaps he didn't want to risk, plus would have been an a little hazardous to threaten someone if the photo had been true or there was any of the others.

Anonymous said...

Jake Gyllenhaal sighting at brunch. Maybe Brooklyn isn't so bad. 2 minutes ago

No Austin this weekend. #5

Anonymous said...

plus would have been an a little hazardous to threaten someone if the photo had been true or there was any of the others

Hazardous? Jake has millions of dollars for lawyers, nothing hazardous about threatening someone to stop posting photos.

Nat and baby said...

Four months after his birth, we're finally getting a good glimpse at Natalie Portman's son, Aleph.

Mom and son were out and about in Hollywood on Thursday, and although we've seen Portman toting Aleph in cities like New York and Paris, we've never seen his face. Until now!

Aleph was born in June; dad is Portman's fiance, Benjamin Millepied, whom the actress met while filming "Black Swan."

Natalie Portman and baby Aleph

Anonymous said...

Exactly because he has million of dollars it doesn't need to threaten someone through his lawyers, he simply could privately contactly him or her and to buy his/her silence

Anonymous said...

I don't think Jake has addresses or phone numbers from all men he was with.

Brooklyn said...

libberation Libby Winters
This brunch brought to you by jake gyllenhall.
2 hours ago

Anonymous said...

No, but if this guy has these photos is probable that Jake can easily arrive to him. using the lawyers instead has definitely cut every possibility of accord

Anonymous said...

2:20 PM - you are contradicting yourself.
But what is your opinion, what do you think happened, why was Jake so pissed off by that photo?

Anonymous said...

No, I am not contradicting myself, I say that if the photo had been true, Jake would have been afraid and he would have tried everything to withdraw it with the smaller noise possible, and this would have been enough easy with all of hisr money and knowledges, therefore if he has not done it it is because surely the photo is a forgery, and obviously it was not dafraid of the reaction or to be denied.

LOL said...

JillFilipovic Jill Filipovic
Having brunch at the same place as Jake Gyllenhaal. The part of the plot where he saw me and fell in love didn't happen though? Weird.
7 minutes ago

Anonymous said...

I say that if the photo had been true, Jake would have been afraid and he would have tried everything to withdraw it with the smaller noise possible, and this would have been enough easy with all of hisr money and knowledges, therefore if he has not done it it is because surely the photo is a forgery, and obviously it was not dafraid of the reaction or to be denied.

1. It is possible that Jake can't contact the person who took that photo(s) - doesn't have enough info to find that person.
2. It is possible that Jake was scared. If the photo is fake why would Jake use lawyers to threaten websites and ask them to take the photo down? He didn't do that with previous photo which is 100% fake (see 1:10 PM link).

Anonymous said...

2:40 PM - why are avoiding giving your opinion about what happened?

Thursday said...

AdeFink adrienfinkel
Hello NYC and Hello Jake Gyllenhal dining next to me at Prune. I can now die.
20 Oct

Anonymous said...

2:40 PM - why are avoiding giving your opinion about what happened?

ow, I thought about having done this! however I repeat, the photo is obviously false, many experts are expressed on the subject, to the beginning the photo had the mark TMZ, when they have checked in their file they have discovered that there was not any photo and this already sets a big mortgage on the truthfulness of the matter, I think that after a few years has been clear for everybody that the history of Ted was a forgery, and that since the film was being all right, he didn't want to risk to revert, because he has understood how much the histories (true or false that is) put on internet, they can hurt indeed, therefore he has immediately thought of cut before it took the biblical dimensionos of the saga of TT. With This I don't Want to Say That jAKE is ETERO, Jake is gay with or without TT story or false photos

Anonymous said...

I thought about having done this!

No, you haven't.

I'll repeat the question: if the photo is fake why would Jake use lawyers to threaten websites and ask them to take the photo down? He didn't do that with previous photo which is 100% fake (see 1:10 PM link). What is your explanation for that?

Anonymous said...

P.S. Jake knows how Internet works - he knew that he can't stop websites from publishing that photo and he knew that he'll attract more attention to the photo by trying to stop websites from publishing it.

Anonymous said...

I think that after a few years has been clear for everybody that the history of Ted was a forgery

Ted was right - Jake is gay.

Anonymous said...

I have done this instead, the first false photo, has gone out in the period of LAOD, where he was practically always naked on a bed, the false photo didn't harm to its image because it was very similar, to the thousand advertising images of the film, instead the second photo is a clear attempt to ridicule him, and to make insinuations on him, if it were true whoever would get angry, Jake has always shown to know how to be to the joke and to have sense of the humor, he has never reacted against all the things said on him, also the most absurd, that's why I believe that its reaction is genuine. Instead why you keep on ignoring all the experienced people consulted that they have said that the photo was false? PS once more I don't believe that Jake is etero

Anonymous said...

Sorry 3:46 PM, but if Grace Jones photo is fake then it proves that Jake's sense of humor is lacking because people with good sense of humor would just laugh it off.

Anonymous said...

Instead why you keep on ignoring all the experienced people consulted that they have said that the photo was false?

There is not proof that photo is false, no opinions from photo experts. Your and anyone else's opinion is just an opinion - not proof.

Anonymous said...

Sense of humor doesn't necessarily mean to accept everything without reacting, a thing it is to laugh with him another it is to laugh at him

good humor said...

When Esquire discovers a Web site that calls George Clooney "gay, gay, gay," the good-natured actor quips, "No, I'm gay, gay. The third gay – that was pushing it."

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20182302,00.html

Anonymous said...

Sense of humor doesn't necessarily mean to accept everything without reacting...

Wrong - adult celebrities with good sense of humor don't threaten websites for posting silly "fake" photos of them.

Anonymous said...

There is not proof that photo is false, no opinions from photo experts. Your and anyone else's opinion is just an opinion - not proof.

October 22, 2011 3:56 PM

This same thing can be said on the sexuality of Jake, anybody proof only opinions. Are you sure to want to cross this road? have a lot of opinions of experts come out in that days , do you believe that the site that the has received the LETTER FROM THE lawyers has not made a verification? or all the other GAY sites ? if the photo had been true they would have gained for months, /they have not insisted because theirs also knew that was false, and it didn't suit to them. Once more I am convinced that Jake is gay

Anonymous said...

lindsaymccomb Lindsay McComb
Um, yes. Great afternoon in Brooklyn. French toast, vintage shops, and Jake Gyllenhaal.
18 minutes ago

Grace Jones photo said...

OfficialJBFans_ Jonas Brothers Daily
Embarrassing Pictures of Hot Guys: Zac Efron, Taylor Lautner, Ian Somerhalder | http://fb.me/1d252Xigj
51 minutes ago

Anonymous said...

Can you honestly say that to Jake something has been saved? or has he ever reacted badly? He has sense of the humor. Do you remember the performance to the SNL? he cannot always suffer

Anonymous said...

This same thing can be said on the sexuality of Jake, anybody proof only opinions.

What?

You are comparing a photo, something everyone can see and check to opinions about sexuality, something you can't prove for straight people, not to mention closeted gay Hollywood celebrities who hide the truth by spending money on PR teams and other people. Oranges and apples, that comparison makes no sense.

Anonymous said...

he cannot always suffer

Suffer? LMAO! Jake suffered because of some silly photo? Give me a break!

Anonymous said...

has he ever reacted badly?

Yes, more than once. Spitting on paparazzi is a good example of Jake acting like an asshole.

Anonymous said...

What?

You are comparing a photo, something everyone can see and check to opinions about sexuality, something you can't prove for straight people, not to mention closeted gay Hollywood celebrities who hide the truth by spending money on PR teams and other people. Oranges and apples, that comparison makes no sense.

October 22, 2011 4:28 PM

Yes, the rule is worth for all ,the opinions they are not facts, and it is easier to discover a false photo than the sexuality of someone

Anonymous said...

Suffer? LMAO! Jake suffered because of some silly photo? Give me a break!

perhaps suffer is not the correct word, I want to say another word that I don't know how to translate in English "subire." can someone help me?

Anonymous said...

it is easier to discover a false photo than the sexuality of someone

True. And so far no one proved that Grace Jones photo is false.

Anonymous said...

Subire - is that Spanish?

Anonymous said...

The paparazzi don't do amusing jokes or irony, they wants only to steal you some photos to sell, it doesn't care if to you it is well or no, if someone wants to defend his privacy it is correct to react

Anonymous said...

True. And so far no one proved that Grace Jones photo is false.

October 22, 2011 4:40 PM

or that Jake is gay

Anonymous said...

Subire - is that Spanish?

no Italian:)

Anonymous said...

LMAO, what a joke! Jake Gyllenhaal is just another cheap publicity whore who uses paparazzi when that suits him - Jake used them 1.000 times to sell his fake heterosexuality.

Anonymous said...

The paparazzi don't do amusing jokes or irony, they wants only to steal you some photos to sell

LMAO, what a joke! Jake Gyllenhaal is just another cheap publicity whore who uses paparazzi when that suits him - Jake used them 1.000 times to sell his fake heterosexuality.

Anonymous said...

True. And so far no one proved that Grace Jones photo is false.

As nobody has tried that they are true, but the fact that the gay sites have allowed to lose, it shows the credibility of the photo

Anonymous said...

True. And so far no one proved that Grace Jones photo is false.
or that Jake is gay


For God's sake!!!
Everyone can prove that Grace Jones photo is fake or not because everyone can examine the photo and do research.
There is no proof that Tom Hanks is straight. There is no proof that Jake Gyllenhaal is gay.
You can't compare those two things.

Anonymous said...

LMAO, what a joke! Jake Gyllenhaal is just another cheap publicity whore who uses paparazzi when that suits him - Jake used them 1.000 times to sell his fake heterosexuality.

WOW Do you kiss your mother with that mouth?

Anonymous said...

Don't blame me for Jake being a whore.

Anonymous said...

All those that have examined the photo have said that is false! and what do you tell me of children and wife of Tom Hnks to proof his heterosexuality?

Anonymous said...

Don't blame me for Jake being a whore.

Well it needs to say that clarity is your strong point;)

Anonymous said...

All those that have examined the photo have said that is false!

Who examined the photo? Please post a link, I would like to read why they think that photo is fake.

Anonymous said...

what do you tell me of children and wife of Tom Hnks to proof his heterosexuality?

Wife and kids aren't proof that man is straight.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23168113/ns/health-behavior/t/i-married-gay-man/

Anonymous said...

Who examined the photo? Please post a link, I would like to read why they think that photo is fake.

October 22, 2011 5:11 PM

OMG! was in almost all the sites that spoke of it, there are hundreds of comment and valid opinions to support, me same have asked to one enough experienced friend of mine, (I know that this doesn't count but is true) you Respond instead! if the photo is true why all the sites have they allowed to lose? now I look for them however,

Anonymous said...

Subire - to put up with or endure - an ordeal?

Anonymous said...

One more time - we are talking about people who examined the photo and who have some kind of expertise, not comments made by ignorant fangirls.

In other words - so far there is no proof that photo is fake.

Anonymous said...

Subire - to put up with or endure - an ordeal?

October 22, 2011 5:33 PM

Yes! thanks! grazie:)

Jersey Tom said...

Thanks for posting that Jackie. ZQ is awesome. He is a hero.

Anonymous said...

In other words - so far there is no proof that photo is fake.

October 22, 2011 5:37 PM

what do you say of f Ted? I understand that he has lately lost some credibility however it is always interesting to feel his opinionTed Casablanca

updated 5/16/2011 7:47:27 PM ET 2011-05-16T23:47:27
Print Font: +-The world stopped today. No, not with word of Donald Trump not running for president or of Demi Lovato stripping down to almost nothing, but rather Jake Gyllenhaal taking it all off! Only problem? Apparently, he didn't.



Well, that's at least what some experts are saying, not to mention Jake himself. Could they all be wrong? Is Jake fibbing? Did he totally do this barely clothed homage to gay disco queen Grace Jones?

TWITTER: Follow Ted

In a word? No.

"It's a fake," says Jake's rep, regarding the picture that has Jake impersonating an old Jones album cover and which seems to have mysteriously appeared out of nowhere.

"The skin tones are really good," says one of our best online photo experts, "but the shadows are completely off. Look how there aren't any against the wall, or along the body anywhere. It's a fake."

"Also, the hand," remarked another photo pro. "It's off, it shows the photo's been doctored."

Our own E! photo wizards say the lighting between the room of the hotel (which, apparently, supplies matching carpet and socks for its guests), and that of Jake's body also do not match.

Damn! This could have been so fab, Jake! Why didn't you do this pose, for real?

Taylor never would have bothered you for a caramel non-fat mocha-latte again!

PHOTOS: No Pants, No Problem!

Anonymous said...

mmmm... well seems that different experts have spoken ;)

Anonymous said...

Which experts? Any names? Experts like Jake's representative? LOL

Anonymous said...

6:08 PM - since when do you believe Ted? Oh, I see, you "believe" Ted only when you need him to prove your point.

think that after a few years has been clear for everybody that the history of Ted was a forgery...

LOL said...

DonSkey Don.Skey
Jake Gyllenhaal, you need to go to the barbershop instead of the Key Food
4 minutes ago

Anonymous said...

Key Food - maybe Jake will finally cook something!

Anonymous said...

BeautifulWish Candac'e H
So I just randomly bumped into maggie and jake gyllenhaal, like how crazy is that lol
1 minute ago

no cooking tonight said...

JacobBrent Jacob Brent
Definitely had dinner next to Jake Gyllenhaal! #NewYorkMoment
5 minutes ago

Anonymous said...

Which experts? Any names? Experts like Jake's representative? LOL

October 22, 2011 6:16 PM

I am sorry but you don't know how to accept the defeat

Anonymous said...

Experts like Jake's representative? LOL

The skin tones are really good," says one of our best online photo experts, "but the shadows are completely off. Look how there aren't any against the wall, or along the body anywhere. It's a fake."

"Also, the hand," remarked another photo pro. "It's off, it shows the photo's been doctored."

Our own E! photo wizards say the lighting between the room of the hotel (which, apparently, supplies matching carpet and socks for its guests), and that of Jake's body also do not match. can you read?

Anonymous said...

think that after a few years has been clear for everybody that the history of Ted was a forgery...

I don't believe very to ted, but I believe in the experts to which he has asked an opinion

Anonymous said...

I don't believe very to ted, but I believe in the experts to which he has asked an opinion

There are no experts, Ted made that up, just like Ted made up that Jake's rep taked to him about the photo.

Anonymous said...

be really unbelievable! surrender yourself, the title of the article is: Photo Experts: Nudie Jake Gyllenhaal Pic Is to Fake! Our own E! photo wizards say the lighting between the room of the hotel (which, apparently, supplies matching carpet and socks for its guests), and that of Jake's body also do not match.once more time
can you read?

Anonymous said...

8:14 PM - you are clueless.
Jake's people would never respond to Ted Casablanca - they know about his Toothy Tile story.
Just because Ted Casablanca wrote something it doesn't mean that it really happened - he's gossiper and E! isn't New York Times.

Anonymous said...

and who has made the fotoshop it is not Helmut Newton and you not Sherlocks Holmes,e I am not the Bible, however 2+2 still do 4, and Ted has not asked to the people of Jake, but to of the experts on the pretense photo of Jake, PS I don't know how to translate the word clueless.

Anonymous said...

So you think that Ted lies about Toothy Tile, that he lies about Jake's reps but is telling the truth about "photo experts"! Too funny!

Anonymous said...

Just yesterday, a photo of Jake Gyllenhaal in his underwear circulated across the internet, as he was said to be paying homage to Grace Jones’ famous pose. Now, we’ve learned that the photo is a fake!

Some photo experts are weighing in on the controversial picture, saying that it’s not actually the actor!

His rep weighed in, saying, “It’s a fake.”

A photo expert said, “The skin tones are really good, but the shadows are completely off. Look how there aren’t any against the wall, or along the body anywhere. It’s a fake.”

Another said, “Also, the hand. It’s off, it shows the photo’s been doctored.”

Are you sad that you don’t get to see the real Jake in his undies? Jake hasn’t really been in the news that much lately, except for the promotion of his latest movie, Source Code. This would have been a nice treat, if it were real, don’t you think? http://earsucker.com/2011/nude-jake-gyllenhaal-photo-branded-a-fake-photo/#comments Not just Ted

Anonymous said...

clueless - totally uninformed about what is going on; not having even a clue from which to infer what is occurring

Anonymous said...

clueless - totally uninformed about what is going on; not having even a clue from which to infer what is occurring

well not a good thing:(

Anonymous said...

8:41 PM - that is the same text reposted by some blog - it was just Ted.

Anonymous said...

You are clueless if you believe gossipers like Ted Casablanca, Perez, Lainey or Just Jared. They all have some agenda and they aren't reporters - they are selling stories, not facts.

Anonymous said...

some experts have been consulted before Ted, then he has asked to the expert of E! do you of it a reason, this it doesn't make Jake etero

Anonymous said...

I'm sure Ted made everything up.
Eeven if he didn't, Ted Casablanca is not reliable source, there is no way anyone will change his/her mind because Ted said that photo is fake.

Anonymous said...

Ted has not said that the photo it is false, he is limited to textually bring what they have said some experts, he has also added that was sorry that it was not true

Anonymous said...

Which part of the word LIAR you don't understand???

Anonymous said...

who is the LIAR in this case?

Anonymous said...

Believe what you want, you aren't going to change anyone's mind by quoting Ted's bullshit.

Anonymous said...

I don't want to change the mind of anybody, and this is not flour of the sack of Ted, but of experts of fotoshop, your reaction seems me an a little exaggerated

Anonymous said...

There are no experts, no Jake's reps, just Ted's fiction.

Anonymous said...

laylow718 laylow718
Just saw Jake gyllenhall (sp) downtown bk ....
1 hour ago

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

The Jake/Grace Jones photo reminds me of the leaked pics of Oscar De La Hoya. He was dressed in women's lingerie, and at the time he of course denied it was him, saying the pics were photoshopped. Even had "experts" who swore the pics were fake.

Well now four years later, and the so called expert was actually hired by De La Hoya's lawyers to say they were fake. Oscar admitted a few months ago that the pics were actually real.


At the time, Mr De La Hoya’s handlers brushed off the photos as bad Photoshop jobs and his accuser as a money-grubber.

But in a tell-all interview this week, the former welterweight champ revealed: ‘It was me.’

Known as 'The Golden Boy,' Mr De La Hoya became the subject of the photo scandal in 2007 when Ms Dravnel, who claimed he had cheated on his wife with her and posted the embarrassing images on the internet.

At the time, the De La Hoya camp claimed it wasn’t him in the photos and that the stripper was 'out for money.'

The Golden Boy’s legal team even brought in their own ‘photo expert,’ who said the photos were a computer-generated forgery.

His spokeswoman said of the photos: 'His head's too small and it doesn't even look like his body.'



Geez that last comment about the head & body sounds familiar. LOL!

Four years later, Oscar De La Hoya comes clean: It WAS me in the fishnet and high heels pictures

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

the experts in this case were independent and consulted in a second moment and not from Jake.

Ted doesn't even name the so called "expert". So who is this person, and how knowledgeable are they? Ted probably just consulted with the resident E! web design person who dabbles in Photoshop as a hobby on weekends.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

From Queerty around the time the pic appeared:

Jake’s a public figure, and we can talk about him if we want to. We can even speculate about what he looks like in his underwear. We can’t — and won’t — claim that this picture of him is definitely authentic, since we just don’t know. (A lot of people seem to claim that it isn’t, but internet-photoshop-experts are about as reliable as internet-lawyers.)

http://www.queerty.com/read-the-takedown-letter-that-jake-gyllenhaals-lawyer-sent-us-over-the-photo-that-we-will-not-be-removing-20110517/

Anonymous said...

but do you know how to read? Ted has brought two opinions of experts it previously expressed

Too stupid for words. Yes sweetchops, I know how to read. I also know not to swallow every word I read on the internet, especially coming from Ted.

Anonymous said...

Then experienced of the sector that they do it for work they are not believable, but a site of distrusted gossip and that it implicitly admits that the photo is false, or however Don't bring elements that characterize it as true but it appeals to the usual liberty of press to justify, its a little professional behavior, insulting for other other categories of workers and the intelligence of the public, among the other the following day has removed the photo. WHY?

Anonymous said...

Sorry, Queerty (and Buzzfeed) was the site that received the letter from Jake's lawyers, and they did not remove the photo. Who cares if Ted removed the photo. He's happy to post fake stories about Jake and his beards, so why bother removing a fake photo?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

they has removed the photo the day after to have said that they would not have done it

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

You obviously believe Ted and his experts. That's ok, but there are also opposite opinions to those of Ted. He is not God (except to SK and co) ;)

Anonymous said...

Ted's / E! experts?!? LOL!

Anonymous said...

The Jake/Grace Jones photo reminds me of the leaked pics of Oscar De La Hoya. He was dressed in women's lingerie, and at the time he of course denied it was him, saying the pics were photoshopped. Even had "experts" who swore the pics were fake. Well now four years later, and the so called expert was actually hired by De La Hoya's lawyers to say they were fake. Oscar admitted a few months ago that the pics were actually real.

Cool. Oscar has great legs :)

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

7:53am - Aren't you embarrassed to quote Ted and his PhD photo experts as the basis for an argument!

Anonymous said...

This is interesting too:

After De La Hoya launched a campaign to discredit the wild images, Milana Dravnel filed a federal lawsuit against him, claiming that his handlers duped her into agreeing that the photos were manipulated.

They settled the lawsuit out of court, and both sides clammed up, citing a confidentiality agreement.

But courthouse sources confirmed Wednesday that De La Hoya paid $20 million to buy her silence. The deal also called for her to give back the heels, lingerie and fishnets that she kept after their kinky photo session.

http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/boxing-legend-de-la-hoya-paid-model-20m-to-keep-quiet-over-his-drag-photos/story-e6frfku0-1226127707120

Jake said...

De La Hoya paid $20 million to buy her silence

Damn!

Anonymous said...

Closet can be VERY expensive.

Anonymous said...

The deal also called for her to give back the heels, lingerie and fishnets that she kept after their kinky photo session.

LOL! Heels in his size are hard to find!

Anonymous said...

KarishmaBhimani Karishma Bhimani
@AUS10NICHOLS Just watched TDATomorrow - the start of my <3 for your sexy grin right there...No wonder @SophiaBush fell for you, I have too!
3 hours ago

Anonymous said...

kathryn_eurms Kathryn Marie ✓
@SophiaBush Do you know what you're gonna be for Halloween yet?! I loved you and @AUS10NICHOLS as Katy Perri & Russell last year! So great!
12 hours ago

Anonymous said...

Aren't you embarrassed to quote Ted and his PhD photo experts as the basis for an argument!

No I am embarrassed only for your slowness. Did you know that the Catholic Church has put us around 400 years to admit that Galileo was right and that it was the Earth that turned around the sun? I hope that you put some less time and that fanaticism doesn't take the upper hand.

Jake said...

Oscar and I should swap shoes, I'm about his size.

Anonymous said...

Please. Don't insult Galileo by comparing him to Ted.

Oscar said...

Jake, call me!

Anonymous said...

In the back of Jake, there am many Mole, as he can easily see in the video of the false tattoo of the Steelers, on the JK show, while in the photo there is not even the shade of a mole

Anonymous said...

9:08 AM - you should take a good look at the Grace Jones photo before making up things.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

9:08 AM - you should take a good look at the Grace Jones photo before making up things.

October 23, 2011 9:11 AM

I HAVE DONE IT

Anonymous said...

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=214660905220023&set=a.212133618806085.58793.212130695473044&type=1&theater mmmmm.... it seems that somebody else has done it tnot only me.

Anonymous said...

No moles to be seen

Anonymous said...

they are seen instead! one especially that to the low right of the helmet, if you look well it is also noticed in your photo with the light of the sun shelled

Anonymous said...

it seems that somebody else has done it tnot only me

LOL, someone else is playing stupid like you.
In Grace Jones photo Jake's body is in such position that moles can't be seen + check out photos like 9:30 AM and stop insulting everyone's intelligence.

Anonymous said...

it is not true, at least two moles they can be seen very well, widening the image, obviously if the photo were true, thing that is not as us well we know

Anonymous said...

9:42 AM - why do you care so much what others think about Grace Jones photo?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

9:43 AM

It doesn't care anything of it in reality and I have also gotten tired, but I don't like the liars, and it make me become rabid because we don't need these stupidities to know that Jake is gay, to sustain these buffooneries is self-defeating

Anonymous said...

9:45am, we know you are still looking for that thing called intelligence as shown by your insistence on quoting Ted as your credible source. LMAO!

Anonymous said...

I think that Jake's Grace Jones photo is real. So far there is no reason to believe otherwise and that would explain Jake's panic and attempt to stop websites from publishing the photo.

Anonymous said...

but I don't like the liars

^ Liars??? You just don't like opinions that differ to yours.

Anonymous said...

It is to certainly talk to you it is not the correct place whether to look for it

Anonymous said...

^ Liars??? You just don't like opinions that differ to yours.

October 23, 2011 9:54 AM

The opinions are not facts, the Facts disavow this theory

Anonymous said...

It doesn't care anything of it in reality

Give us a break. Check out your comments, you are obsessed with proving that photo is fake. For some reason you believe that that photo is really bad for Jake's image.

^^ said...

Ânother homophobic case?

Anonymous said...

I don't think Jake was in such a panic to have the pic removed since the letter only went out to a few sites and it was ignored.

I suspect Jake's lawyers issued the letter w/o consulting Jake. The letter was poorly written and unprofessional, it was from his lawyers office but most likely an intern did it that's why there was no follow-up.

The picture is silly and deserved to be ignored which I think he did, it was his legal dept that jumped the gun

Anonymous said...

I suspect Jake's lawyers issued the letter w/o consulting Jake.

Bullshit x 1000.

Anonymous said...

I suspect Jake's lawyers issued the letter w/o consulting Jake. The letter was poorly written and unprofessional, it was from his lawyers office but most likely an intern did it that's why there was no follow-up.

Your Ignorance is blinding and embarrassing.

Anonymous said...

Sorry, lawyers don't act on something like that without their client knowing.

"Oh hi Jake, this is Richard Thompson of Bloom Hergott Diemer Rosenthal LaViolette Feldman Schenkman & Goodman, LLP.

We just sent a letter to queerty.com about a picture you know nothing about. That will be $5000 thanks. Have a nice day!"

Anonymous said...

I doesn't care anything of it of the image of Jake, personally I think that the poster of Pop is a worse photo for hisr image of that of Grace Jones, not to talk then of the walk to Taylor Swift, it is not a matter of images but of truth. How can we be believable saying that he is gay if we submit us to these stupidities that all can check and to deny?
he passes for persecuted and us for liars

Anonymous said...

Sorry, lawyers don't act on something like that without their client knowing.

And lawyers certainly don't check new Jake's photos on the Internet.

Anonymous said...

10:01 AM -9:57 AM



We are two different people, I don't think of this way on the letter and the lawyers, it is obvious that Jake knew and he has sent them

Anonymous said...

it is not a matter of images but of truth. How can we be believable saying that he is gay if we submit us to these stupidities that all can check and to deny?

You can't prove that photo is fake because you have no argument to claim that photo is fake.
We DON'T need to be photoshop experts in order to notice Jake's showmances and PR fiction.

Anonymous said...

We just sent a letter to queerty.com about a picture you know nothing about. That will be $5000 thanks. Have a nice day!

LOL :)

Anonymous said...

whoever has seen the photo has said that me it is false I have brought tons of matters, but you make the Indians because it suits you, I have gotten tired and it is ridiculous to continue for the last time,: where is the shade on the wall that should be? why the face has clearer spots of light in comparison to the body? why the head is greater in comparison to the body? where are the moles and the muscular tone? the man in the photo is lower than J, and there is not the same distance between neck and shoulders. where are the hair?. however every one of us remains with his/her opinions and it is all right so, there is not worse deaf of whom doesn't want to listen.

Anonymous said...

10:41 AM - for the 100th time: your OPINION is just your OPINION.

Just because you believe something it does NOT make that the truth. That is still just your opinion and others have the right to have different opinions.

Anonymous said...

there is not worse deaf of whom doesn't want to listen

We are listening. The point is that you are wrong, that photo looks real to me.

Anonymous said...

The picture itself is not objectionable, it's the fact that it's so obviously photoshopped. It would be a great pic if it were actually Jake's body. He's got a nice one, long arms and legs and torso. The guy in this pic looks more short and compact, and all the other elements look stilted and unnatural. This pic is so obviously a photoshop deal, that's what people are saying. This is so laughable, it's a common yoga pose that Grace Jones did not invent. lol Men have been doing yoga for centuries. That some would build up so much controversy about it says more about their own predjudices about gay people than those you accuse of being homophobes.

Just another attempt to goad Jake out of the closet, and cutting off anyone who would disagree by calling them homophobes to shut them up.

I don't believe Jake's lawyers would have gotten involved in something so minor, there are pics like this all over the internet, just another day at the shop if you ask me. (Although we haven't seen the Austin and the legs pic in quite some time either, come to think of it.) I'm sure he and his people ignored it, as with all the others.

I think some were taking 'journalistic license' and I use that term very loosely.

Rock Lobster said...

The lobster claw hand is the funniest thing.

Anonymous said...

Why simply you don't answer to the questions? where is it the shade that should be on the wall? PS if I mistake you you are wrong at least the double PPS my opinion can be wrong but at least I try to bear it with concrete facts and believable examples, yours no, you repeat only to me it seems true, or Ted is not believable, but you knows a thing it is ok for me thinks what you want to say what you want. Can matter now be changed?

Heresy said...

Whaaaaa? Ted is not believable? MichaelK didn't seem convinced either.

Anonymous said...

The picture itself is not objectionable, it's the fact that it's so obviously photoshopped.

Photoshopped? Looks like Jake Gyllenhaal to me.

Anonymous said...

It's strange that no one has ever found the original pic where Jake's head was supposedly cut and pasted from.

bear said...

There doesn't seem to be a lot of Jake's body hair either - this guy in the pic seems more blond.

Anonymous said...

It's strange that no one has ever found the original pic where Jake's head was supposedly cut and pasted from.

We don't know this, maybe they have, and maybe they will. Never say never!

Anonymous said...

This pic is so obviously a photoshop deal, that's what people are saying. This is so laughable, it's a common yoga pose that Grace Jones did not invent. lol Men have been doing yoga for centuries. That some would build up so much controversy about it says more about their own predjudices about gay people than those you accuse of being homophobes.

You are so right that I don't even know how to find the words to say it

Anonymous said...

Why simply you don't answer to the questions? where is it the shade that should be on the wall?

^ Why should there be a shadow on the wall? If no flash was used, there would be no shadow. Also, the room appears to have recessed lights (you can see one near the door). These types of lights would not cast a shadow on the wall.

Anonymous said...

We don't know this, maybe they have, and maybe they will. Never say never!

Oh come on! The OMGers know every pic of Jake inside out. Someone would have found it by now.

Anonymous said...

There might not necessarily be a shadow, depending on the lighting, I agree.

I wish Jake would pose doing yoga, some black and whites would be beautiful. Like Herb Ritts photos of men, which are gorgeous.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Jake's Grace Jones photo is genuine, that's why Jake freaked out and called his lawyers.

Anonymous said...

The OMGers know every pic of Jake inside out. Someone would have found it by now.

I'm sure they are on the case, even as we speak!

Anonymous said...

The picture itself is not objectionable, it's the fact that it's so obviously photoshopped.

Sure, so obviously photoshopped that Jake called his lawyers the minute he saw it! LOL

Anonymous said...

You go to study what the reflexes and the shades are before speaking, better for you

You are never satisfied. You cried because no one answered your question - you got a logical answer - but no, that's not good enough! You are not interested in explanations. Go back to drinking Ted's koolaid breast milk. Bye

Anonymous said...

OMG has better things to do now like complain about the latest fake tweets and are pissed that Austin and Sophia are in NC hanging out at haunted houses!

Anonymous said...

The arm that the foot holds would have had to make shade on the wall for strength, and you sees that under the picture on the wall it is very more dark color

Anonymous said...

That some would build up so much controversy about it says more about their own predjudices about gay people than those you accuse of being homophobes.

Some???? Those some are Jake and his people.

Anonymous said...

11:46 So is the body fake now as well? I thought it was just the head. Maybe the wall is fake, and really is a doorway to the fifth dimension.

Anonymous said...

OMG has better things to do now like complain about the latest fake tweets...

Latest fake tweets? You mean tons of tweets from last 5 weeks which prove that Jake is in NYC all the time and Austin never ever visited? No wonder OMG is pissed off, Jake and Austin keep proving that they broke up long time ago and that there are no BTs.

Anonymous said...

Fake tweets = those they don't want to believe.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

PG is calling Austin a deadbeat dad because he is dumping his parental duties on Jake, while Austin is romping around in haunted houses with Soapfia.

Anonymous said...

11:46 So is the body fake now as well? I thought it was just the head. Maybe the wall is fake, and really is a doorway to the fifth dimension.

October 23, 2011 11:49 AM

Yes and even in this fifth dimension Jake and Austin are married indeed and they have some children! I wanted to say that the wall returns the shade therefore it is not the type of light that makes the shade of Jake to miss

Anonymous said...

12:00 PM - no, there shouldn't be shades, try to make up some other "argument".

Anonymous said...

It's strange that no one has ever found the original pic where Jake's head was supposedly cut and pasted from.

Good point.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

PG is calling Austin a deadbeat dad because he is dumping his parental duties on Jake, while Austin is romping around in haunted houses with Soapfia.

So OMG is pretending that 1.000 tweets about Jake being out in the city every day, eating breakfasts, brunches, lunches and dinners, attending different events, are fake?
Or OMG thinks that fathers usualy leave their kids at home and go out to eat?

Anonymous said...

They'd rather believe that Austin and Jake are deadbeat parents than that there aren't any babies? :(

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 3560   Newer› Newest»