FAKE photo GOOD for your public image:
FAKE photo BAD for your public image - Call a lawyer as soon as possible!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Blog for those interested in the truth about Toothy Tile and Gray Goose
Search This Blog
Blog info
Toothy Tile Blind Items
Other places
Blog Archive
Disclaimer
This blog is for entertainment purposes only. Images used here within this blog belong to their respective copyright owners and no infrigement of copyright is ever intended.
2,181 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 1601 – 1800 of 2181 Newer› Newest»is it perhaps a secret that you want to bring you in the grave, is it something that you want to share only with the dearrest friends and with the few chosens of this blog? perhaps to clearly see these examples they serve me the glasses 3D?
5:36 PM - please stop playing stupid. ALL examples, ALL articles and ALL photos are posted in OMG and WFT2 comments. We told you that 10 times. Don't blame us because you are too lazy to read them.
5:36 PM - read 5:31 PM post / example, I hope that won't be too much work for you.
how can this be a proof that Jake is gay? this is a test that Jake was not them and that he didn't perhaps want to be it is us as the history of the guitar and the bracelet that himself has denied, if he wanted to convince everybody that the relationship was true he would have gone to the birthday with so much of photo and promotional kiss,
or as that cinema critic that has reviewed Source Code without having seen it and for this he has been dismissed, this could also show that there are lazy journalists that don't check the facts of which they write. and then why Usweekly she should be to the service of this lie?
Sure, it is normal that a guy doesn't give a shit about his girlfriend's birthday.
And it doesn't mean anything when tabloids write fiction about "so much in love couple".
hope that won't be too much work for you.
don't make to pass my thirst of knowledge from direct sources for idleness now
and then why Usweekly she should be to the service of this lie?
Jake and Swift never dated. They sold fake, posed photos to Us Weekly, so Us Weekly got exclusive (fake) story about their "relationship" and Jake and Taylor got lots of publicity and tabloid cover. It was a win-win.
million of motives can have been us for which was not interested to the birthday ,you are that choose what does you more comfort, I have seen on Gossip cop that when they have asked him on the bracelet or the guitar or Rachel Bilson he very kindly has denied
if it is so simple (I don't know what win-win wants to say ) why an evening that they were together in car the paparazzos they were them to crowds he has even called the police that has arrived with the helicopter? would not he have had to exploit the situation?
and above all I cannot believe that Maggie lends herself and her daughter to these things
Sorry, I'm not going to answer your questions. If you are interested you can do your own research or read old WFT2 and OMG comments and posted articles.
As I've said, I don't care what you believe and I don't care about changing your mind or convincing you that Jake's relationships were showmances.
P.S. To be clear - I'm not going to answer your questions because we have answered and discussed all those issues, so you can read the answers and discussions if you want.
P.S.S. ... and ask questions AFTER that.
for me the discussion could end the first time that you have told it you are that you have wanted to continue, I had also wished you a good afternoon to be polite. PS the photos of UsW are not posed looks on youtube still good afternoon.
6:39pm has revealed their true colors. It took awhile. They lurked like an innocent but the obtuseness of the repeated questions is starting to smell like something rotten.
What?! LOL
What?! LOL is for 6:39 PM :)
PS the photos of UsW are not posed
LMAO!!!! You are just another silly and ignorant troll :)
ITA, whoever 6:39pm is, they have become tiresome. It's been over 2 days of their stilted writing and their redundant and stupid questions. If they knew enough about Jake to search for and find a Jake is gay blog, how can they continously ask so many questions about bearding, Austin, etc. Don't know who you are 6:39pm, but you've become a bore. Enough of your faking already.
6:39pm has revealed their true colors. It took awhile. They lurked like an innocent but the obtuseness of the repeated questions is starting to smell like something rottenwhat? but what are you talking about? I speak only for myself I don't bring any theory and I don't hide anything stop to see complots everywhere and to free accuse, I am new of this blog it is to your difference I don't have certainties, I have said in a preceding post that I believe that jake is bisexual has been together to AUSTIN, but I don't succeed in believing that a pathological liar is such as you describe it , and I was now reading me the comments of the link of 5:31 pm to be more prepared. am I sorry if my questions seem you dull but it are what they are questions, you can have us to whether to do without immediately thinking about the spectra?
Dear Pigeon Guts:
About six months ago, I met this great guy. He's funny, handsome and the kindest guy I've ever met. Our humor and temperaments are so similar I wake up, sometimes, with him next to me and can't believe he's actually real. I've never believed in true love or love at first sight or "the one," but this guy makes me question that maybe, just maybe, all those impossible things might be true.
But then, of course, there's a problem. This guy is an actor. He's been on TV shows and in movies, on covers of magazines and is expected to only get more well-known. He's also not out ... to anyone. Not his parents, not his friends, not his agent, no one. I don't even think his therapist knows. If it had just been curiosity and sex and exploration like it was at the beginning, I would just walk away (quietly bragging to my friends, of course!), but he tells me that he loves me and doesn't want me to go, and I want to love him back (and kinda already do, if I'm gonna be honest to myself), so I've stayed, so far. But I've always been out and proud. So right now, I feel kinda sh*tty about myself. I feel like I'm compromising who I am. I told myself once that I would never date a guy who wouldn't hold my hand in public but here I am, having a relationship that never leaves my apartment, or his. The one time we were out -- I convinced him no one would care about us getting frozen yogurt -- photographers showed up and he quickly ditched me in the street.
There's also been rumors of him dating various co-stars and starlets. A few months ago, he was photographed frolicking with one and it stung so much I told him I couldn't do it anymore. But he was so upset that he flew across the country, while he was in the middle of filming, to tell me that it was nothing, that I was getting upset with him over nothing, and that he really loved me -- he just wasn't ready to announce it to the world yet.
I would never out him, and I don't feel like it’s fair of me to ask him to choose between me and his career. It’s important to him, and it’s become important to me. I want his dreams to come true. I want to see him, twenty years from now, to look back, amazed, at all the things he was able to do.
But it’s breaking my heart. He doesn't even want to be seen with me. How can I be proud of this? How can I be proud of him when he's too scared to tell anyone he loves me? I've never met anyone who seems to understand me the way he does. We don't meet people like that every day, right? But this can't be the love of my life, doomed to secret corners and hushed shadows. I don't know what to do. I don't know what's best. How long should I wait? Should I wait? Do I leave and lose him, or do I stay and lose myself?
-- J, New York, New York
The Pigeon Guts Speak: One of things I find most interesting about my job as an advice columnist is that I find myself giving two people in similar situations what seems to be the exact opposite advice. But read closely, and you’ll see that it’s not.
I think you should give this guy a chance.
What if you lived in 1692 – the time of the Salem Witch Trials? Would you still be frustrated with the fact that your boyfriend hasn’t come out? Would you still feel like you’re compromising your ideals?
Probably not, because you’d both have a really good reason to stay closeted.
Does your boyfriend have a good reason now? We can all be armchair quarterbacks and firmly insist that if we were in his place, we’d be out and proud and open – that there is no homophobia in Hollywood anymore, and even if there is, it’s our gay responsibility to act like there isn’t.
But when push comes to shove, how many people actually do this? Even actors most of us applaud and admire, people like Chad Allen and Neil Patrick Harris and Luke Macfarlane, weren’t out at that all-important beginning of their careers.
I can’t speak for them, but I can imagine what they were thinking: “Acting is my passion, the most important thing in my life. It’s also the most difficult profession in the world to be successful in. Am I willing to make it even more difficult, maybe even sacrifice my passion entirely, in the name of an abstract cause?”
Your case is a little different, in that this guy isn’t out to anyone. But weirdly, I think that’s how you’re going to decide whether or not to stay.
I think you should tell him that you completely support his decision to be professionally closeted, at least for the time being. In this instance, I think this is a reasonable request. And then you need to support him, despite the sacrifices.
But I think you should also tell him he needs to finally start the personal coming out process: he needs to tell his therapist, parents, and friends that he’s gay – and he needs to start meeting your trusted circle of friends as well.
As for frolicking with starlets, that needs to stop – or at least be discussed in advance with you and decided together.
This is a reasonable compromise. More importantly, it will tell you what you really need to know: if he’s temporarily closeted because of his very good reason, or if he’s a f**ked up closet case who isn’t mature or confident enough for a relationship.
P.S. Please be aware that part of what’s so amazing about this guy might be the situation. Secret loves are hot – and who wouldn’t be flattered to have a Hollywood star fly across the country to apologize to you? But no matter what happens, you’ll always have Paris.
http://www.afterelton.com/pigeonguts/06-15-2011
The one time we were out -- I convinced him no one would care about us getting frozen yogurt -- photographers showed up and he quickly ditched me in the street.
Frozen yogurt? Damn,that brings up memories! lol
I am not anybody and again I don't hide anything and I do so many questions that to you they seem stupid because I am not American and I don't know how they work it the things it is because you are so certain of his sexuality, I have found by chance this blog reading a fanfiction and I am liked the liberty with which spoke, I don't want to provoke anybody to annoy you of it with my pompous and redundant writing, I want rather I wanted only to know more of it thanks however.
For the last time then, the best way to educate yourself, 7:26pm, is to go back and read the posts on WFT2 and OMG, just start reading. There is too much territory to cover for everyone to keep adressing all these questions. You say you want to think for yourself, well you can do that after reading and drawing some of your own conclusions. Then come back with any further questions. It's monopolization what has been going on.
I was really going away from here and greeting, nothing more questions, not to worry I will seek elsewhere my truths good-bye and thanks
"Frozen yogurt" is the new code word for closeted actors!
LOL :)
"Frozen yogurt" is the new code word for closeted actors!
LOL. And their beards are called "stale tarts".
I was really going away from here and greeting, nothing more questions, not to worry I will seek elsewhere my truths good-bye and thanks
Don't you just love people who expect the world to evolve around them? :)
Well s/he thought s/he was the center of attention for two days!
(Not in a good way lol)
Beautiful Boy is playing at the Sunset 5. My sacrifice to the Indy Gods paid off. http://twitpic.com/5c28o6
11 hours ago
Uhh. Today's my 1st twitter birthday. I have so many questions. First, is anyone throwing a party for me tonight? Second, who is my mother?
8 hours ago
Where was I born from? If I'm only 1, am I still tweast-feeding?
8 hours ago
June 15 - Jogging With Michael Pena In The Hollywood Hills
IHJ gallery
Awww, how nice is that, bonding with a new colleague :)
Austin giving birth to BT
NSFW
Awful Truth - Toothy and Grey: True Luv 4eva!
Like it was ever even a question! Fifty-six percent of you believe it's time for Toothy Tile to face the music and open that closet door, with hubby Grey Goose lovingly at his side, of course! And we agree. It's been a decade, can you even imagine the party Team Truth would throw if T2 said "I'm here, I'm queer, get used to it!"
OMG is celebrating? Or are they pissed off with Ted because he forgot BT(s)?
7:59 AM - from DL? That's quite perverted.
I saw it DL too. That 'baby' is about as real as BT!
O.O
And their beards are called "stale tarts".
LOL
mrmain18: @NikiMarieR #steeltown has been filming in my office bldg all day. Saw a lot of Maggie Gyllenhaal. Got some autos and pics with.
about 16 hours ago
jslasht: OMFG I JUST SAW JAKE GYLLENHAAL!
about 19 hours ago via TweetCaster for Android from Burbank, CA
Chinese Bride Discovers Groom Is Gay When His Boyfriend Crashes The Wedding
Oops & LOL :)
:)
OMG is celebrating? Or are they pissed off with Ted because he forgot BT(s)?
not sure why people always obsessed with how OMG is reacting? Who cares, I say.
Only the troll is obsessed with OMG. He hangs on every word written 24/7.
not sure why people always obsessed with how OMG is reacting?
I'm not obsessed. I used to post on OMG for two years and sometimes I'm curios, but can't force myself to go back.
OMG Bruce Lee has returned and wants back its man! the most amusing thing I have seen this year
I just discovered Sam Sparro. Sex on a stick.
Sam Sparro - Black and Gold
Great song. Sam is openly gay.
Yes, some of his pics are really beautiful. Love that song too. :)
Anyone has Sam's number?
^ Jake and Sam could go on a frozen yogurt date!
After hot sex date :)
but can't force myself to go back.
lol. no one's ever forced to be on a blog. It's a free world. But it's also weird to keep looking if you don't want to go back. ????
I'm not looking. I'm curious what OMG thinks about "hubby without kids". Not curious enough to go back and look, but curious enough to ask if someone was there.
They think that a recent photo of Austin and Sophia at Bonnaroo was photoshopped. They have used their sooper sleuthing skillz to conclude that Austin was not really in the pic, as he had teleported back to LA to breastfeed the 25 BTs.
Thanks 3:09 PM!
kiss
cake
This was photoshopped too?
If the photo doesn't fit with their conspiracy theory, then they will say it is photoshopped. LOL!!
The Leadville pic is definitely photoshopped.
They think that a recent photo of Austin and Sophia at Bonnaroo was photoshopped.
Hiding Jake's and Austin's whereabouts = the only reason for photoshopping and faking twitter acounts and Facebook acounts for posting fake sightings.
But,
only small part of Jake is gay believers think that Jake and Austin being in the same city proves that they are married and have kids. That theory contradicts common sense so there is no reason for PR to be concerned about it, there is no reason for PR to fake all mentioned things.
And you can have 100 fake twitter accounts but no one can stop millions of twitter people to post and tweet real Jake or Austin sightings.
The Leadville pic is definitely photoshopped.
What was "photoshopped"?
No one is saying Austin was in LA instead of Bonnaroo.
The photo is clearly off, and no, I don't think it is pr, but probably some fangirl desperate to put the two together in a new photo.
Still find it odd that out of the tens of thousands of people at the festival, most of whom probably had cameras, the only photo of the two of them together is one that looks fake. It's not like last year when there were a lot of photos of them together, and lots of sightings of them together.
They may have both been there, but don't think they were hanging out together too much.
We have pictures of Reeke kissing too, doesn't make them real anymore than Sophin pictures makes them real.
I have no idea what Jake and Austin's relationship is right now, if anything, but it plain as day that Sophia is nothing more than a beard.
Uhh. Today's my 1st twitter birthday. I have so many questions. First, is anyone throwing a party for me tonight? Second, who is my mother?
8 hours ago
Where was I born from? If I'm only 1, am I still tweast-feeding?
This is code for one of the BT's right?
I'm a digital graphic artist so I went over to OMG to see the photo in question. Yes, it's definitely photoshopped. I counted at least 15 different major issues. They've pretty much concluded that the photo was probably slapped together by fangirls. Sophia Bush fangirls desperate to put the two together. Makes sense.
Dear Ted:
Do Grey Goose and Toothy still raise Baby Tile together? How can T.T. and G.G. lie about who they are and raise a child in secrecy and expect the child to turn out OK? I worry about Baby Tile. Am I the only one?
—Hot in Houston
Dear Child Services:
Sure Baby Tile has a pretty effed-up living sitch, but at least that sitch is safely away from the glare of Hollyweird. Just think of all the kids that have to grow up with their paparazzi photos splashed on the cover of tabloids. Now that's something to worry about.
This is code for one of the BT's right?
:) Possibly. We need to consult the Word document as that is the definitive source for everything Jake & Austin!
but it plain as day that Sophia is nothing more than a beard
It isn't. I believe that Sophia is a beard, but no, the showmance is not that transparent at all.
Sure Baby Tile has a pretty effed-up living sitch, but at least that sitch is safely away from the glare of Hollyweird. Just think of all the kids that have to grow up with their paparazzi photos splashed on the cover of tabloids. Now that's something to worry about.
Ted is an idiot.
Only an idiot would suggest that denying and hiding a kid is better than having paparazzi taking photos of the kid, like parents can't protect kid from paparazzi if they care.
This is code for one of the BT's right?
Why don't you inform Ted that there are more BTs? Ted is still talking just about one BT.
They've pretty much concluded that the photo was probably slapped together by fangirls. Sophia Bush fangirls desperate to put the two together. Makes sense.
LOL! There are plenty of pics of Austin & Sophia together already available. It's the jaustaloons who are desperate to infer that Austin was not at Bonnaroo (ergo, Austin was with Jake).
Sophia Bush fangirls desperate to put the two together. Makes sense.
No, it doesn't make sense at all - Sophia Bush fangirls have more than enough photos of Sophia and Austin, there is no reason to photoshopp anything.
Why don't you inform Ted that there are more BTs? Ted is still talking just about one BT.
You missed Ted's seekrit message. Notice he uses the words "Child Services" - plural - meaning more than one BT.
Child Protective Services (CPS) is the name of a governmental agency in many states of the United States that responds to reports of child abuse or neglect. Some states use other names, often attempting to reflect more family-centered (as opposed to child-centered) practices, such as "Department of Children & Family Services" (DCFS). CPS is also known by the name of "Department of Social Services" (DSS) or simply "Social Services."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Protective_Services
I'm a digital graphic artist so I went over to OMG to see the photo in question.
You posted "The Leadville pic is definitely photoshopped"?
I'm a digital graphic artist
I'm BT's surrogate mother.
Child Protective Services (CPS) is the name of a governmental agency in many states of the United States that responds to reports of child abuse or neglect. Some states use other names, often attempting to reflect more family-centered (as opposed to child-centered) practices, such as "Department of Children & Family Services" (DCFS). CPS is also known by the name of "Department of Social Services" (DSS) or simply "Social Services."
More proof there in more than one BT!
Huh???
Check the sekrit word document all the answers are there.
Only an idiot would suggest that denying and hiding a kid is better than having paparazzi taking photos of the kid
Ted did not suggest that one existence was better than the other. If fact, he was just reminding people that these guys are serious about their roles as parents. Just like any sane person, I'm sure he's hoping they will do the right thing. Which is to come out. Sooner rather than later.
You posted "The Leadville pic is definitely photoshopped"?
No I'm talking about the Sophia Bush with Austin in Bonnaroo pic. The Brandon Fuller blog photo was from a runner in the Leadville 100 and was completely legitimate. The question has never been whether or not that picture was photoshopped. The question is whether or not that's Austin. I think it is.
Ted did not suggest that one existence was better than the other.
Yes, he did.
Sure Baby Tile has a pretty effed-up living sitch, but at least that sitch is safely away from the glare of Hollyweird. Just think of all the kids that have to grow up with their paparazzi photos splashed on the cover of tabloids. Now that's something to worry about.
LOL do you hear yourself, 9:52? You've bought into that tripe? You've sucked all the Koolaid-Aid dry I see.
The question is whether or not that's Austin. I think it is.
You think???
We compared ear shape to Austin photos and know for sure that the man isn't Austin.
No, it doesn't make sense at all - Sophia Bush fangirls have more than enough photos of Sophia and Austin, there is no reason to photoshopp anything.
Oh, yes there is. One Tree Hill fangirls are perplexed with how the two of them do not even intereact on Twitter anymore. Sophia didn't even mention Austin's LA event and he doesn't mention her involvements. The chill is brutal and the girls are beginning to worry. They bragged about how they would be at Bonnaroo for weeks. When no photos appeared, they made one up.
No no 9:57. You've got it all wrong. When Ted says BabyTile it's used as an umbrella term meaning ALL of the BTs. Sheesh! Get with the program!!! ;-)
When no photos appeared, they made one up.
^ Too stupid for words.
One Tree Hill fangirls are perplexed
LOL they said that did they? "We are just so gosh darned perplexed that Austin and Sophia aren't sending US seekrit messages through twitter!!"
When Ted says BabyTile it's used as an umbrella term meaning ALL of the BTs.
The jaustaloons have all their bases covered :)
When no photos appeared, they made one up.
1. Photo doesn't look photoshopped.
2. Just because OMGs are desperate enough to lie and make up fiction about Jake and Austin it doesn't mean that other fans would do the same. What would be the point of lying to themselves?????
Just like any sane person, I'm sure he's hoping they will do the right thing. Which is to come out. Sooner rather than later.
If you are sane, why are you ignoring the facts about Jake and Austin living their own lives away from each other?
What would be the point of lying to themselves?????
Because they are PERRRRRRRRPLEXXXXXXED!
Oh and because there is no other logical OMG explanation for why Austin would want to spend time with an icky smelly girl! Girls have cooties!
Ted is simply reminding people to have some perspective when he mentions celebrities who exploit their children. He does not deny that BT is in a pretty effed up situation. And, I'm sure he is hoping the guys do the right thing. I know I do. :-)
Ted would no longer have a story if the boys "did the right thing" now would he.
Sorry 10:15 PM, but suggesting that celebrity kids are damaged by paparazzi or that celebrity parents can't protect kids from paparazzi is stupid beyond words.
BT being kept away from doing normal things with parents is a bad thing and only really bad people woud do that to a kid.
1. Photo doesn't look photoshopped.
2. Just because OMGs are desperate enough to lie and make up fiction about Jake and Austin it doesn't mean that other fans would do the same. What would be the point of lying to themselves?????
What do you mean the Sophin visual doesn't look photoshopped? That is one of the worst "creations" I've ever seen. So it shows your bias.
And why do you always have to mention OMG? Your obsession with that blog borders on insanity. I don't even post over there. OTH fans want these two to be together and people have been questioning what's going on between them for about three weeks now. So yes they have a reason to be concerned that no photo appeared. Remember, they don't want to believe that their precious Sophia is a beard to a gay man. Others on their forums have begun to question what's going on too. So someone wanted to prove they have nothing to worry about by faking a photo of them being at the music festival together. Fangirls are fanatical. Not rational. Remember, Sophia said that she and Austin were going to be at Bonnaroo last March. Can't have Sophia look like a liar.
What do you mean the Sophin visual doesn't look photoshopped? That is one of the worst "creations" I've ever seen.
Bullshit.
Photo looks real or like great photoshopp work. But the point remains - there is no reason for anyone to fake such photo.
And why do you always have to mention OMG? Your obsession with that blog borders on insanity.
LMAO!!!
Do you ever stop and think? You should try that!
Your obsession with that blog borders on insanity
Says the woman dissecting every word on a OTH message board. Pot. Kettle.
Remember, Sophia said that she and Austin were going to be at Bonnaroo last March. Can't have Sophia look like a liar.
There were tweets about Austin and Sophia @ Bonnaroo, desperate fangirls faked that too? lol
LOL!
Ted doesn't need a "story" about Toothy to keep his job at E! Everyone knows who the BV is, and they have for years. I think Ted simply wants the two guys to come out and live their lives out of the shadows. That's what the poll was about yesterday and the BT Blind Item today. Ted has always been fond of Jake.
Yes, Ted likes Jake, but continuing BT and hubby fiction isn't a good idea.
Ted is fond of page hits. Page hits pay his bills.
I think Ted simply wants the two guys to come out and live their lives out of the shadows.
That's nice. Shame their "marriage" and multiple BT's are fictional. LOL!!
There were tweets about Austin and Sophia @ Bonnaroo, desperate fangirls faked that too? lol
Not really. If you compare the positive, numerous tweets from last year with some of the few and vaguely worded tweets from this year, the difference is like night and day. One person even said Sophia was with an actor but he couldn't remember his name. Yeah right. There are always bogus sightings. I remember one time we actually had a picture of Jake in LA and someone tweeted that they just saw Jake in Hawaii.
Oh didn't I read on twitter that Austin and Sophia were backstage at some of the gigs? Yes I did. That would account for fewer tweets from the general populous. Glad
I could clear that up for you.
Yes, Ted likes Jake, but continuing BT and hubby fiction isn't a good idea.
That's because Toothy and Goose aren't fiction. Neither is Baby Tile. Ted has no vested interested in continuing to talk about Jake being a father, if he wasn't. And no reason to talk about Jake being married if he wasn't. You just don't like the idea that Jake is a family man. Frankly, he would probably get a lot more hits, if he talked about Toothy being footloose and fancy free. He could conjure up new, salacious stories every night. No doubt, his readers would be far more interested. Instead he has never altered his story other than first thinking Toothy and Goose were going to adopt. Three months later he modified his statement and said his source was wrong and that they were going to swirl their love juices instead. Otherwise, Ted has stayed true to the Toothy saga. Following beards and careers for six years now to cover up his boyfriend/now husband and the family they are raising in private.
Oh didn't I read on twitter that Austin and Sophia were backstage at some of the gigs? Yes I did. That would account for fewer tweets from the general populous. Glad
I could clear that up for you.
No it wouldn't. Jake was largely backstage at the Revival Tour and we had tons of photos and tweets. Glad I could clear that up for you.
That's because Toothy and Goose aren't fiction. Neither is Baby Tile. Ted has no vested interested in continuing to talk about Jake being a father, if he wasn't. And no reason to talk about Jake being married if he wasn't.
Ever hear the entertainment phrase "Give the people what they want"?
Jake was largely backstage at the Revival Tour and we had tons of photos and tweets.
Wonder why that was. Oh I know!!! Because Jake is far more recognizable than Austin!
I'm sure there are a lot more people who would prefer raunchy, sexy, carefree Jake. So if Ted was concerned about playing to the crowd, he would not continue to talk about Family Tile. Actually, Ted's stuff on Toothy doesn't even get that many hits these days. Certainly, nothing like it did even just a few years back. Jake's bearding over the years has really hurt his, and by association, Ted's fanbase. The Taylor Swift thing about did Jake's career in. You can see how even Waiting for Toothy 2 is no longer as active as it once was. So no, I don't think Ted is giving "the people" what they want. Quite the contrary, in fact.
^ Said like a good loyal kool aid drinker
Oh I know!!! Because Jake is far more recognizable than Austin!
You just finished saying that Sophia and Austin were recognizable enough to have someone tweet about them being backstage. In fact, Austin is more recognizable this year than he was last year. He's received tons of publicity with the Gulf, Surfrider, River Ride, his fake relationship with Sophia Bush, his visibility through twitter, et al. Austin didn't have any of that notoriety/visibility last June in Bonnaroo. So actually, there should have been more sightings this year. As we know, there wasn't.
Said like a good loyal kool aid drinker
Sarcasm is not an argument. Although I'm sure your double digit IQ mistakes the two all the time.
Whose being sarcastic? You obviously lap up everything Ted's dribbles out, so one can only conclude you are a kool aid lackey.
I'm sure you're superior brain can understand that. Pity it doesn't know the definition of "sarcasm".
10:53PM you believe that Little Bo Peep and her sheep are still living with the old Lady in a Shoe and her kids? Have you been to visit her lately? On Sunday evenings she usually invites the fork and the spoon over for dinner so they can all watch the cow jump over the moon. If you click your heels together 3 times while touching you nose and sticking tounge out, you will magically appear at her dinner table for the feast and entertainment of a lifetime. Oh, forgot something special for you, that's were the "BabyTiles are hidden". Jake and Austin uses her as their Nanny. But you know what, she really wants to keep the Little tiles and adpot them because she thinks J/A are terrible dads. That's you and my secret, OK. Don't tell anyone.
LMAO
I'm sure there are a lot more people who would prefer raunchy, sexy, carefree Jake. So if Ted was concerned about playing to the crowd, he would not continue to talk about Family Tile. Actually, Ted's stuff on Toothy doesn't even get that many hits these days. Certainly, nothing like it did even just a few years back. Jake's bearding over the years has really hurt his, and by association, Ted's fanbase. The Taylor Swift thing about did Jake's career in. You can see how even Waiting for Toothy 2 is no longer as active as it once was. So no, I don't think Ted is giving "the people" what they want. Quite the contrary, in fact.
^^^^ Hey there Special K
That's because Toothy and Goose aren't fiction. Neither is Baby Tile. ... You just don't like the idea that Jake is a family man.
There are no facts that support family man theory.
There are tons of facts which support Jake isn't married and has no kids opinion.
Your wishfull thinking can't undo facts.
I'm sure there are a lot more people who would prefer raunchy, sexy, carefree Jake. So if Ted was concerned about playing to the crowd...
Liar.
Toothy is so popular because readers love closeted gay man in love story and you know that.
Silly trolly, why are you always here? Why don't you troll the Internet with "Jake is straight" bullshit?
No one is saying Austin was in LA instead of Bonnaroo.
Destiny, too bad you don't dare to say what you really thinking.
So what ARE you saying?
That Austin and Sophia will end bearding contract soon?
^ Exactly. OMG's also think that there is some big conspiracy because Austin tweeted that the camera on his phone wasn't working at Bonnaroo.
Then we had Peegee saying she wasn't "happy" about the pic of A&S LOL. Why? Because she couldn't make up crap about Austin really being with Jake, and not at Bonnaroo. So what was the next best thing? Oh that's right, wheel out the old "photoshop" BS.
Gawd, the jaustaloons are getting loonier by the day, if that's even possible!
That's because Toothy and Goose aren't fiction. Neither is Baby Tile.
Just Baby Tile? Did J&A believers change their minds about BTs and now agree with Ted that there is only ONE BT?
I'm sure there are a lot more people who would prefer raunchy, sexy, carefree Jake. So if Ted was concerned about playing to the crowd, he would not continue to talk about Family Tile.
I know that you don't believe that nonsense because we all know that gay love story is the point of Toothy Tile saga and the reason so many people like it.
And we all know that Ted is lying every day when he's selling Robert Pattinson & Kristen Stewart showmance as a real relationship.
Then we had Peegee saying she wasn't "happy" about the pic of A&S LOL.
Ring Ring!
Peegee [crying, stamping feet]: Tom! Tom! Oh.My.Dog! I..I..I just can't believe what he has done! [sniffles]
Olay Tom: Wha- who? [totally confused]
Peegee [sniffling]: A-A-Austin. He appeared with that woman at Bonnaroo. [Wailing] Howwwww could heeeeeee???
Olay Tom [bewildered]: Huh? Calm down peegee!
Peegee [snorting]: I...I...I tell you what! I’m going to burn the Leadville photo that I have hanging over my bed!
Olay Tom: B-B-ut...But...M&M blew up that photo especially for you. She even had it framed!
Peegee: Well what are we going to do? [smug look on face] I know! I know! I'm sooo clever! You can say that the pic is photoshopped!
Olay Tom [shaking in fear]: Um. Um. I... I... I can’t say that on OMG. I want to be mean to Jake and Austin, but I’ve already been caught out lying last week!
Peegee [in a rage]: I.AM.NOT.HAPPY.TOM...NOT.HAPPY. I.HATE.THAT.F*CKING.SOAPY.BUSH. Waaahhhhh!!
To be continued...
6:41 AM - you are BAD!
Ted has no vested interested in continuing to talk about Jake being a father, if he wasn't. And no reason to talk about Jake being married if he wasn't. You just don't like the idea that Jake is a family man.
Ted is lying and making up shit about Robert Pattinson & Kristen Stewart all the time so you can't use "Ted wouldn't lie" argument.
What's with "you just don't like the idea that Jake is a family man" shit?
People who believe Jake is gay don't like the idea of Jake having a kid with a man and therefore planning to come out soon????
Unfuckingbelievable.
OMG LMAO 6:41am!
I was hoping that once the annoying person who kept asking questions every 2 seconds finally left this blog that the discussion would improve. I've read through the thread from last night and, once again, the person who continues to assault and harass Oh My Godot posters has taken over. If its not one looney, its another. This Jack, or whoever it is, can't stop his harassment of these people and WFT2 has suffered because of it. If Ted is such a liar why does this person continue to read him and hang around here? That's what is unfuckingbelievable.
My two cents: Some of the discussion about the Bonnaroo picture was interesting. Fangirls are obsessed about Sophia Bush. Not Austin Nichols. So I can see them being upset that no photo appeared. It was also odd that the photo came to light on Tuesday. Several days after the festival.
Jake Gyllenhaal’s secret about the 4 stages of dream chasing.
June 17, 2011 in Quitter with View Comments
Actor Jake Gyllenhaal once said that there are four stages of acting.
“First, it’s ‘Who is Jake Gyllenhaal?’ then it’s ‘Get me Jake Gyllenhaal,’ then it’s ‘Get me someone who looks like Jake Gyllenhaal,’ and then ‘Who is Jake Gyllenhaal?’”
I loved that quote because it speaks to the up-and-down reality that everyone experiences while chasing a dream. Not just actors or people we’d label as “artists.” Anyone who dares risk an extraordinary life, whether starting a small business to develop CRM software or becoming a professional photographer, will experience peaks and valleys. And in Gyllenhaal’s quote, which is perhaps the most difficult word I’ve ever spelled, we see a hint at the danger of chasing a dream for the wrong reason.
If you chase a dream just to get fame, you’ll eventually stop dreaming. Because fame is simply the byproduct of people liking what you do. And, eventually, they won’t like what you do or at least not with the same intensity they had when you first did it. And if fame is fueling your dream, when that fame goes away, so will your reason for chasing your dream.
The dream you’re chasing has to run deeper than that. It has to be knit into the very fiber of who you are. It has to be an overflow of what’s inside of you, a river that is not waiting for permission or approval to flow. It has to be you simply being you. Because when the fame goes away and the attention goes away and the fun opportunities go away, you’ll still have you. And as long as you’ve got that, you have everything you need to keep working on your dream.
If you’re just starting out and people in your industry or field are saying “Who is Jake Gyllenhaal,” that’s OK. If you’re in a valley after 10 years of ups and downs and people are saying, “Who is Jake Gyllenhaal?” that’s also OK.
Neither group of people are why you’re chasing your dream.
http://www.jonacuff.com/blog/jake-gyllenhaals-secret-about-the4-stages-of-the-dream-chasing/
Yeah, the troll is talking to himself again.
Some of the discussion about the Bonnaroo picture was interesting. Fangirls are obsessed about Sophia Bush. Not Austin Nichols. So I can see them being upset that no photo appeared.
OK, let's presume that one of those fangirls has great photoshop skils.
But what would that mean? That Austin lied about being 3 days @ Bonnaroo? That Austin was in LA with Jake and Peter? That Austin and Sophia don't like bearding as they used to? Something else?
The problem is that a dreamer (someone who chases their passion) has to be true to themselves. Jake has been living his life according to other people's rules and expectations for far too long. As a result, the question needs to be asked, "What dream is Jake still chasing?" His or Hollywood's version.
My point - discussing anything with J&A believers is painful because they never really speak their minds and always hide behind Ted.
Don't know what the original posters think about what the Bonnaroo photoshop means. I simply think the fangirls don't like the chill that has set in between Sophia and Austin. Looks like Austin arrived on Thursday and left Saturday morning. She came on Friday. They were obviously not together.
As a result, the question needs to be asked, "What dream is Jake still chasing?" His or Hollywood's version.
From what I can see, Jake is chasing "big money & fame" Hollywood dream.
the point is if T&Bt theory collapses it collapses everything
They were obviously not together.
Austin tweeted about being @ Bonnaroo on Friday, Saturday and Sunday. We have Austin and Sophia @ Bonnaroo tweets and that photo. Photo looks real.
"They (Austin and Sophia) were obviously not together" is typical J&A spinning based on wishful thinking.
Jake was under the radar for a very long time (since the end of May). So who knows where he was? He definitely wanted us to think he was in LA all along because in reappeared in Venice with the PR sanctioned photo op with Peter this past Sunday. Yet, we all know that when Jake is in LA he is seen about town. However, there was barely a whisper for almost two weeks so he could have been anywhere.
the point is if T&Bt theory collapses it collapses everything
I think OMGs are lying, pretending and making up insane theories because they believe that too. Ted can't lie about Toothy because that would mean that Toothy isn't gay or that Jake and Austin weren't togeter. And that is really stupid.
Jake was under the radar for a very long time (since the end of May).
Jake is very much out in the public:
June 15 - Jogging With Michael Pena In The Hollywood Hills
June 12 - Lunch With Peter In Venice, CA
June 12 - Jogging With Peter In Santa Monica
May 29 - Leaving The Arclight Theater In Hollywood
May 29 - Out For A Jog In Los Feliz
May 28 - In A Parking Garage In Hollywood
May 27 - Out & About In LA
May 27 - Visiting A Medical Center In Beverly Hills
May 27 - Lunch At L'Ermitage In Beverly Hills
May 27 - Visiting A Salon In Studio City, CA
May 25 - Stopping By A Bank In Beverly Hills
May 19 - Departing From LAX Airport
May 19 - Leaving A Karate Class In Los Angeles
May 18 - Leaving The Urth Cafe In West Hollywood
May 14 - Hiking With Friends At Runyon Canyon
Ted is really stupid and you that believe in him too
However, there was barely a whisper for almost two weeks so he could have been anywhere.
True, but what that has to do with Austin and BT?
We KNOW that Jake and Austin don't make an effort to be in the same city when they aren't working.
We DON'T KNOW if Jake and Austin are together those 9-10 weeks per year when they are in the same city at the same time.
Jake is very much out in the public:
June 15 - Jogging With Michael Pena In The Hollywood Hills
June 12 - Lunch With Peter In Venice, CA
June 12 - Jogging With Peter In Santa Monica
May 29 - Leaving The Arclight Theater In Hollywood
May 29 - Out For A Jog In Los Feliz
May 28 - In A Parking Garage In Hollywood
May 27 - Out & About In LA
May 27 - Visiting A Medical Center In Beverly Hills
May 27 - Lunch At L'Ermitage In Beverly Hills
May 27 - Visiting A Salon In Studio City, CA
May 25 - Stopping By A Bank In Beverly Hills
May 19 - Departing From LAX Airport
May 19 - Leaving A Karate Class In Los Angeles
May 18 - Leaving The Urth Cafe In West Hollywood
May 14 - Hiking With Friends At Runyon Canyon
nothing can be done against the facts
The photo does not look real from Bonnaroo and Austin indicated (out of nowhere) that there would be no more photos as of Saturday morning because his phone was "broken." The other tweets were just copy and paste jobs of who was playing (can get that off the Internet). That kind of tweeting tells me that he was going through the motion to place himself there for the rest of the weekend for whatever reason. More than likely because of OTH. Both said they were going to Bonnaroo so it would have looked peculiar if he left once Sophia arrived.
I think he left on Saturday morning possibly because Sophia showed up. If he wanted us to think they were together he would have done so. Sophia never mentioned Austin either. Pretty apparent they were not there together.
Ted is really stupid and you that believe in him too
Jake's bearding confirmed Ted's "Jake is gay". Toothy Tile saga is amusing, but we don't need Ted to know that Jake is gay.
I think he left on Saturday morning possibly because Sophia showed up.
Why would he do that?
Thanks for the chronology but you just proved my point. From May 30-June 11 there is a huge gapping hole in Jake's LA sightings. Almost 2 weeks. Plus, just because Jake is seen out at Runyon Canyon doesn't tell us what he's doing the rest of the 23 hours of the day, or who he's spending the day with.
If he wanted us to think they were together he would have done so.
You forgot all those photos of Austin and Sophia together? Traveling, at parties, shopping, kissing, eating, visiting Austin's family and holding kids, Austin talking about Sophia in his last interview, ...?
There is no need for Austin and Sophia to keep repeating that they are "together".
Jake can be gay or not, independently from the bullshit of your Ted
Thanks for the chronology but you just proved my point.
You don't have a point, you are just playing stupid, as usual.
We KNOW that Jake and Austin don't make an effort to be in the same city when they aren't working.
We DON'T KNOW if Jake and Austin are together those 9-10 weeks per year when they are in the same city at the same time.
Let me see if I understand this. Because Austin and Sophia aren't living their lives 24/7 on twitter means they weren't together at Bonnaroo even though tweets placed them there together throughout the weekend? Okay. LOL
For weeks now, Austin has not wanted to be associated with Sophia. Nor has she mentioned Austin. Almost like once OTH was given 13 more weeks, they parted ways. After all the showmance was all about OTH. They may get together now and again in the future, but it's obvious he's not spending time with her and that neither are going out of their way to promote "togetherness".
Plus, just because Jake is seen out at Runyon Canyon doesn't tell us what he's doing the rest of the 23 hours of the day, or who he's spending the day with.
And based JUST on that OMGs concluded that Jake could be married to Austin and could have kids. What a joke.
they are not enough glasses for your climbs there
After all the showmance was all about OTH.
Was??? Austin and Sophia will spend MONTHS filming together and promoting OTH. Showmance is far from over.
9:13 you are the one playing stupid. Twitter has been the primary means they have sold their relationship to the public. The fact that they didn't even arrive together at Bonnaroo and that Austin made sure that you knew that, says plenty. Then when Sophia shows up, his phone gets "broken"? Maybe you're the type who needs a sledgehammer but their separateness is apparent. Notice also that one pic "leaked" last week of Sophia kissing Austin. There had been no photos of them kissing before (other than show related). Looking at the color of their hair the photo is maybe from 2009. Why would a two year old photo need to be leaked now? Oh, yeah. Because the fangirls are getting restless.
We KNOW that Jake and Austin are married as Ted called GG "hubby". Beards, tweets, sightings are all part of the charade.
I am not an OMG person and Jake was the one who said he was married. I saw the article posted here a few months back. It was from December 2009 after he had just broken up with Reese. And, no Jake is not joking. The context of the comment is deadly serious.
listen to yourself, how desperate!
How quickly you forget that he also said he doesn't have any children. Can't have it both ways.
True, but what that has to do with Austin and BT?
It has everything to do with Austin and BT. You just answered your own question.
Where was he from May 29 to June 12?
I'm waiting.
fact that they didn't even arrive together at Bonnaroo and that Austin made sure that you knew that, says plenty.
Huh? Says what?
We KNOW that Jake and Austin are married as Ted called GG "hubby". Beards, tweets, sightings are all part of the charade.
someone needs help,very soon
How quickly you forget that he also said he doesn't have any children. Can't have it both ways.
Why would he lie about being married?
Where was he from May 29 to June 12? I'm waiting.
Why was Jake alone, without Austin, in NYC during last December and beginning of January? He forgot about his hubby? I'm waiting.
Where was he from May 29 to June 12? I'm waiting.
Why did Jake spend Austin's birthday with Marcus and the band? I'm waiting.
Why would he lie about being married?
Why would he lie about not having children?
Why would he lie about being married?
Why would Jake denied his own kids? Jake brought that up, it's not like anyone asked him about his kids.
Beards, tweets, sightings are all part of the charade.
Keep ignoring common sense and facts, that's all you can do.
Hiding Jake's and Austin's whereabouts = the only reason for photoshopping and faking twitter acounts and Facebook acounts for posting fake sightings.
But, only small part of Jake is gay believers think that Jake and Austin being in the same city proves that they are married and have kids. That theory contradicts common sense so there is no reason for PR to be concerned about it, there is no reason for PR to fake all mentioned things.
And you can have 100 fake twitter accounts but no one can stop millions of twitter people to post and tweet real Jake or Austin sightings.
hey Jake stop to tell lies! are confusing there!
It has everything to do with Austin and BT. You just answered your own question.
Where was he from May 29 to June 12?
Typical OMG insanity - we don't get Jake's photos for two weeks (Peter was in LA), so that is an argument for "Jake and Austin are married and parents" theory. LOL!
Why would Jake denied his own kids? Jake brought that up, it's not like anyone asked him about his kids.
LOL! That's bullshit. He said it in an interview last year: 'I don't have children, so I can still be selfish and say, "I'm going to go and be on my bike for three hours."'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1336545/Jake-Gyllenhaal-Im-uncomfortable-naked-set-Ive-crazy-things.html
June 8 - Peter Sarsgaard interviewed on 'Conan'. (Maggie is filming on the East Coast.)
June 12 - Lunch With Peter In Venice, CA
June 12 - Jogging With Peter In Santa Monica
9:50 AM be a war car !
Please try and make sense 9:55AM #2
Why was Jake alone, without Austin, in NYC during last December and beginning of January? He forgot about his hubby? I'm waiting.
Jake was not alone in NYC. Austin was with him. Or, did you forget that there were absolutely no pics of him with Sophia. Austin may have taken a trip to Michigan to visit family for a few days, but Jake was in NY for several weeks. So try again.
Yeah, we all know Jake continues to lie about having children. Until he comes out we know he will continue to lie. I think he said he was married because the Reeke ordeal had just ended and he couldn't wait to slip something into an interview. He figured people would cover for him, but he got it out there nonetheless.
9:57 AM
in the sense that you go straight to the point you try what you say and don't lose a hit, it was a compliment
we don't get Jake's photos for two weeks (Peter was in LA), so that is an argument for "Jake and Austin are married and parents" theory. LOL!
Yeah, like Jake was spending all that time with his brother-in-law. Now, that would be worrisome.
Jake was not alone in NYC. Austin was with him. Or, did you forget that there were absolutely no pics of him with Sophia.
LOL!
YOU forgot that Jake was out in NYC a lot, with people who weren't Austin.
Or, did you forget that there were absolutely no pics of him with Sophia.
Henry Cavill has not been pictured with Sophia either. Does that mean Jake was with Henry?
See how your dumb logic works!
Henry Cavill has not been pictured with Sophia either. Does that mean Jake was with Henry?
See how your dumb logic works!
LOL
Yeah, like Jake was spending all that time with his brother-in-law. Now, that would be worrisome.
J&A believer: "Jake was with his husband and kids. The fact that we didn't get photos for 2 weeks proves that." Too stupid for words.
or it is everything forgery or JAKE not Pay any shit about his children and Austin it doesn't have any dignity
Does that mean Jake was with Henry?
I wish! *sigh*
When Henry met Jake...
When Henry met Jake...
:)
SOPHIA IN AFGHANISTAN WOULD BE HAD TO ENGAGE WITH A TALEBAN, NOBODY CAN ACCUSE A TALEBAN TO NEED A BEARD
Ever gay should be so lucky to have a beard like me! And I look great in stilettos!
and Afghanistan won't be anymore the same after me and my stilettos
Poor troll. Rants and raves all to no avail. He has not changed anyones mind about Jake being gay yet.
J&A believers like you never change either - people are disscusing J&A not being together
and you are pretending that we are discussing straight Jake.
P.S. Jake doesn't need to be married to Austin and have secret kids in order to be gay.
Post a Comment