Wednesday 5 January 2011

Silly Showmance is Over

January 4, 2011

"Taylor Swift and Jake Gyllenhaal are starting 2011 single. "They're over," a source tells PEOPLE about the short-lived relationship."

Source: People magazine, Taylor Swift & Jake Gyllenhaal Break Up

1,449 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   1201 – 1400 of 1449   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

Angelina would be a bad choice, nowadays she looks more sick than sexy or powerful, and she's too old for the part.

Anonymous said...

I'm surprised not much more has been made of Jake's hand on Michelle's knee. If it were anyone else, they'd be engaged by the tabloids already.

They probably did a research and know that Jake is her and Heath's kid's godfather. Jake is comfortable with Michelle. Knee on hand was most, most likely a harmelss gesture. He did the hand on the knee with Anne a lot. :)

Btw, congrats to Anne for getting to play Catwoman. It will be hard to beat the beautiful and great Michelle Pfeiffer.

Anonymous said...

Michelle Pfeiffer has beautiful face, but with zero sex appeal IMHO. Loved Kim Basinger, she is a beauty!

Anonymous said...

I think Monica Bellucci in her younger days would've been the perfect choice for Catwoman. Or the internet choice Eva Green who is extremely sexy in motion. If I were Nolan I would've gone for someone European, a lesser known actress with lots of sex appeal. Anne is already too much the young Julia Roberts for my taste.

Anonymous said...

Monica Bellucci - another real beauty.

Anonymous said...

Have you seen Michelle Pfeiffer as Catwoman? She OOZES sex appeal.

Anonymous said...

^^for 3:30 PM

Anonymous said...

IA Michelle P. was sexy as Catwoman.

Anonymous said...

Have you seen Michelle Pfeiffer as Catwoman?

Yes. Meh + her body isn't sexy.

Anonymous said...

Michelle looked great in the catsuit.

Anonymous said...

Anne will do a great job. Look at her body of work, she's very versatile. She already is a star, she'll be a bigger one after Batman. :)

Anonymous said...

LOL, Nolan worked with Heath, Maggie, Anne... Michelle W. is probably next. When will be Jake's turn? I know he tried for the Batman and Two Face roles, both times rejected by Nolan.

Anonymous said...

Anne's Oscar gig makes sense. Warner Bros. most likely made it happen like 20th Century Fox did with Hugh Jackman in 2009 for his then upcoming Wolverine.

Anonymous said...

^^Good point.

Anonymous said...

Michelle W. is probably next.

I doubt it. Michelle isn't Nolan's type of actress.

Anonymous said...

But Maggie G. is? Also Maggie and Michelle are sort of a similar hipster type of gal.

Anonymous said...

Look at the actresses Nolan casts in his movies. Maggie fits in, Michelle doesn't.

Anonymous said...

P.S. Nolan only cast one blonde actress in all his movies - Scarlett Johansson.

Anonymous said...

Well, Michelle is blond and much better actress than Scarlett Johansson :)

Anonymous said...

Anne Hathaway as Catwoman

No wonder Jake kept on praising her during LAOD promo and the GG interviews. He's such an ass kisser. ;)

Anonymous said...

IA Michelle P. was sexy as Catwoman.

^^^ Halle Berry was the sexiest CatWoman, although the movie was pitiful.

Anonymous said...

“Beneath it all, Taylor is a hurt little girl,” a friend tells In Touch of the country cutie,

"a Friend"??? Please stop with this bullshit. who the hell is the friend? Give me a damn name for the "Friend".

Friend = PR = Publicist = Public Relations

Anonymous said...

No wonder Jake kept on praising her during LAOD promo and the GG interviews. He's such an ass kisser. ;)

Nah, I think he really likes and respects Anne and vice versa.

Anonymous said...

3:41, you must be blind because Michelle was at her gorgeous peak when she played Catwoman.

3:41 PM said...

I have a great eyesight, 4:48 PM. Her face was beautiful, performance OK, but her body was never sexy.

Jake The Abs Gyllenhaal said...

Anne Hathaway as Catwoman and Tom Hardy as Bane in The Dark Knight Rises.

Tom, call me if you need working out tips!

Anonymous said...

Jake and Mark Silverstein (Busy's hubby) out for coffee:

IHJ

Anonymous said...

^^ Is that Natalie?

Anonymous said...

This is getting suspicious. Maybe Busy is their beard?

Anonymous said...

Boys just want to have fun! ;)

Anonymous said...

Noooooooo!! Jake is hanging out with a heterosexual male who is married to Michele's best friend and Godmother to Matilda and Mark and Busy have a baby!!!!!

I thought all gay men do is fuck and suck 24/7 and listen to lady gaga! It's Jake's PR trying to butch him up, they aren't friends!!!!

Anonymous said...

Silverstein: Trying to get Jake to do a movie based on another one of his shitty screenplays

Anonymous said...

Gee, everyone's having new projcets except for Jake.
I read that Clooney and Gosling started shooting Faragut North (a role that Jake wanted to play, but Clooney went for Gosling).
I know there is Source Code, but I'd be more confident if the early reports weren't so negative. It was really risky to ask Duncan Jones to direct the movie, I know Moon was supposedly good, but maybe it was a one hit wonder? Remember when Gavin Hood got an Oscar for his first feature and then, according to reviewers, ruined Rendition?

Anonymous said...

It's Jake's PR trying to butch him up, they aren't friends!!!!

As if you'd know. Jake and Mark and Busy have been hanging out for a while now. Jake even went to Birdie's b-day party.

Anonymous said...

Silverstein: Trying to get Jake to do a movie based on another one of his shitty screenplays

I hope not.

tweet said...

erictcarrasco: For Batman 4, Nolan will cast Jake Gyllenhaal or Michelle Williams as Crazy Quilt. #fakenews #Batman #theguylikesBrokebackMountain
about 1 hour ago

Anonymous said...

I don't think so, this is the last Batman for Nolan.

Anonymous said...

Jeez you don't get humour? ^^^^

Anonymous said...

What's suspicious is that Jake is being photographed with Busy's hubby all of a sudden. In the past, the focus was always on Busy. When people recently here, and on OMG, started questioning why Jake's hanging out with a mother who's been quoted as saying that her top priority is raising her daughter, I'm sure Jake's PR team has told Jake to start being seen with her husband too. I have no doubt that Jake's protectors are afraid too many people are asking questions about the daddy rumors. It's too late though. Jake has been hanging out with Busy since 2009, only after she had a child. The fact that he hangs with couples with children is very telling.

I know not everyone believes the BT rumors, but if you're open minded, the clues are there. Hot single guys do not continually hang around with frumpy moms and dads. They hang out with single people. Just like hot straight guys don't have marathon media saturation to ship them flirting with every woman in sight at the The Art of Elysium’s Charity Gala and Golden Globe Awards. I laughed this morning when I saw the Huffingtonpost website with this headline: Christina Aguilera At Jeremy Renner's Party: Passes Out Drunk In His Bed. If Renner were straight, he wouldn't need a headline like this.

Anonymous said...

Bisy ain't frumpy and jake has been hanging out with her since 2006. I sighting of Jake, Heath, Michele and Matilda and a blonde has been ID'd as Busy.

2006-2010: Busy/Mark/Reese and her kids/Maggie/Peter/Ramona=Jake is a bog baby and misses the family "unit" since Mommy and Daddy split, he wants a family like the above, that's his idea of happiness.

Jake would never be seen with Busy in the first place if there was concerned. I bet he has some kind movie of project going with Mark.

I think you are pissed 7:44 that Jake is being portrayed as a pussyhounds, there is no BT.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

I think Jake and his PR team are at a crossroad. Jake isn't very good at faking showmances. After 2 1/2 years of Reeke and more than 50% of comments about them were still either they're fake or together for PR only-not a real couple. The Swift romance was not believable from the beginning and ended up a PR nightmare mostly for Jake. Both showmances made Jake look bad both during and after. Reeke made Jake look boring, bland and whipped. After Reeke, he came away looking dumped, clingy and immature. Swyll not only had people asking what if anything do they have to talk about, but made him look almost pervy and immature at the same time. After Swyll he looks like an insensitive asshole and a two face. Takes part in a very obviously staged photo op-that even main stream media called it staged-and then it's reported he didn't want the attention the romnance brought him. Who can he find for his next beard? Is there some high profile blond actress that would be willing to beard for him and not look awkward and fake with him? It's also odd that there's no news about him lining up any new jobs. It does as though Jake's kind of over the whole HW thing. Wonder if he is really considering more behind the camera work like directing or producing. It would take alot of the media/pap glare away from him and maybe the need to beard. Maybe he could be more himself. And perhaps finally get rid of his horrible PR team. Just something to think about.

Anonymous said...

Yes. Jake should direct.
Has he ever directed anything? Could he do it?

Anonymous said...

He used to have a production co called Nine stories, I don't know if he still has it. Silverman is a producer/writer, maybe he is trying to kick start the production co. He has mentioned directing several times during LAOD promotion.

I lot of his peers have production co's so he may as well explore that as well.

Anonymous said...

2006-2010: Busy/Mark/Reese and her kids/Maggie/Peter/Ramona=Jake is a bog baby and misses the family "unit" since Mommy and Daddy split, he wants a family like the above, that's his idea of happiness.

That's plain bullshit. Misses family unit? You must be kidding me. If Jake wants a family so badly he would have already had one. Oh, wait! He probably has and you just can't stand it. Give me a break. He's thirty years old. Hot and famous. Lots of friends. Money. A natural extroverted personality that draws people to him.

Comparatively, Maggie hooked up with Peter in 2002, when she was 25 and had a baby in 2006, at 29. Michelle is only a few months older than Jake. Yet hooked up with Heath when she was only 23, had a child at 25. Busy Phillips was 28 when she married and 29 when she had her baby.

Yes, I do think Jake loves children, and is domestic/family-oriented by nature. But, you didn't see him behave this way (consistently hanging around couples with children) prior to 2008. You hang out with people who are like you. That's why I think Jake is already a father. Has been for some time. And, no, Jake did not use to hang out with Busy. If she happened to have been in a group setting with Heath and Michelle that is NOT the same kind of behavior that we are experiencing now. Busy is Michelle's friend. If Jake were with them back 2006 that is completely different than him seeking out her company, attending her two year old's birthday party, breakfasting and shopping and the local farmer's market, time and time again, while living in LA.

Anonymous said...

The latest about Swift is the biggest joke of all. Shes totally destroyed by a man she had all of 3 dates with. That does not even qualify as a relationship. At that stage a phone call is not even required. No longer calling is still a common way of ending things at that stage.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Christina Aguilera At Jeremy Renner's Party: Passes Out Drunk In His Bed.

LOL. And with all the makeup she wears I'd hate to see the state of those sheets. They probably had to be burned.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

2006-2010: Busy/Mark/Reese and her kids/Maggie/Peter/Ramona=Jake is a bog baby and misses the family "unit" since Mommy and Daddy split

What the chin and her kids have to do with anything? Jake didn't hang out with the beard because he wanted her company.

Anonymous said...

I have no doubt that Jake's protectors are afraid too many people are asking questions about the daddy rumors.

But there are no daddy rumors, we never heard any rumors about Jake and BT.

Anonymous said...

But, you didn't see him behave this way (consistently hanging around couples with children) prior to 2008.

That's because people get older and have kids.

Atticus said...

I'm Jake's baby.

Anonymous said...

He has mentioned directing several times during LAOD promotion.

You don't just wake up one day and start directing movies, if Jake is serious about directing he should start working on that.

Anonymous said...

I know not everyone believes the BT rumors, but if you're open minded, the clues are there. Hot single guys do not continually hang around with frumpy moms and dads.

Parents hang around with their kids, having friends with kids is irrelevant.

Anonymous said...

if Jake is serious about directing he should start working on that

Jake, Franco could use some help :)

BT said...

Atticus said... I'm Jake's baby.

Shut up!

Anonymous said...

Parents hang around with their kids, having friends with kids is irrelevant.

No, my observations see parents hanging with other parents who have kids. They compare home remedies, talk about birthing experiences in large detail, talk about the funniest thing son or daughter did the other day.

And young, single, "hot" people don't want to listen to that after awhile, sorry. It becomes boring and the single person has no like experiences to share with the group.

Anonymous said...

You don't just wake up one day and start directing movies, if Jake is serious about directing he should start working on that.

LOL, Austin will have more experience after he directs his first episode of crapfest OTH (I know, I know - TV's a bit diff to movies)

Anonymous said...

No, my observations see parents hanging with other parents who have kids.

Jake is 30, his friends are old enough to have kids. Jake hangs out with Adam Levine or Marcus or Matthew Katz, too - they aren't married and have no kids.

Anonymous said...

And young, single, "hot" people don't want to listen to that after awhile, sorry.

Huh??? According to you it is noteworthy that Jake hangs out with Maggie and Peter because they talk only about Ramona and parenting.

Anonymous said...

Austin will have more experience after he directs his first episode of crapfest OTH

Will have? I thought OTH is over and done.

Anonymous said...

AUS10: I got my script today. Its pretty outstanding. I'm going to direct my tits off.

--
OTH was renewed for another 6(?) episodes

Anonymous said...

I'm going to direct my tits off.

EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!

Anonymous said...

OTH was renewed for another 6(?) episodes

Thanks, I thought that filming is finished.

BT said...

I'm going to direct my tits off.

Who's going to breastfeed me?

Anonymous said...

Jake is 30, his friends are old enough to have kids. Jake hangs out with Adam Levine or Marcus or Matthew Katz, too - they aren't married and have no kids

Just like Jake is more than old enough to have kids. Parenthood changes your life and lifestyle. Look HOW MUCH Jake has changed since the info was floated that he was going into the closet in late 2007. I'm convinced now more than ever that he has a family of his own. Reeke officially started in late 2007 as well. Probably as cover. A distraction. Notice how the fauxmance was rolled-out after the moive opened to make it appear to the cynical at heart that it was about selling tickets. However, if that were true, they would have unveiled the "relationship" in the US before the movie opened to ramp up interest.

Anonymous said...

Look HOW MUCH Jake has changed since the info was floated that he was going into the closet in late 2007.

Jake didn't change at all. Well, OK, he did buy a motorcycle, but that's something a new parent wouldn't do.

Anonymous said...

Parenthood changes your life and lifestyle.

Exactly. Jake didn't change his lifestyle, he's still bearding and going out often and traveling a lot and ...

Anonymous said...

I always thought that whole Adam Levine connection in June was odd. We never saw Jake hanging out with him before that. Yet before he goes into hiding in July, he's seen out "partying" with him as if they are swinging bachelors looking for chicks. Given Levine's reputation, I'm sure Jake's PR thought that would be a good thing. Instead it looked contrived and awkward. Levine's ridiculous, "Stop thinking Jake Gyllenhaal is Gay" statement on September 23 was even odder in OUT magazine.

Anonymous said...

Notice how the fauxmance was rolled-out after the moive opened to make it appear to the cynical at heart that it was about selling tickets.

It was about selling tickets and publicity, just like bearding with Swift. There is ZERO reasons, rumors or indications that BT exist.

Anonymous said...

"Huh??? According to you it is noteworthy that Jake hangs out with Maggie and Peter because they talk only about Ramona and parenting."

That is obtuse. Maggie & Peter are family and they are also part of Jake's safety net cover.

Anonymous said...

LOL!

Anonymous said...

That is obtuse.

That is true. People don't turn into one track idiots just because they are parents.

Anonymous said...

Exactly. Jake didn't change his lifestyle, he's still bearding and going out often and traveling a lot and ...

Yeah, going out to the Farmers Market. Shopping at Whole Foods. Driving his seven passenger Audi. Jogging once in awihle. Going out to breakfast with Busy Phillips.

Go to IHEARTJAKE and you will see the Jake before 2007 and the Jake afterwards. Prior to 2007, he was out all the time. Like a single young, hot guy would be. Now, he's hardly out at all. If he were truly single, he would be out all the time. Look at this past summer. He totally disappeared from the face of the earth. He never did that before. But, he had too, because he no longer had Reeke to hide behind. Then in September, he disappears again. Very odd behavior for a single guy.

Anonymous said...

Why isn't Jake being seen with Adam Levine now that he is in LA?

Instead Levine is making sure to be seen making out with his girlfriend. I think he's looking out for his own "straight image" right now by NOT being seen with Jake because people were starting to wonder out loud about him and Jake.

Anonymous said...

Go to IHEARTJAKE and you will see the Jake before 2007 and the Jake afterwards.

Jake in 2010: Going out in Montreal all the time. Going out with singer Marcus. Going to concerts. Going out with Adam Levine. Traveling to NYC and MV (not on business) more than once. Driving motorcycle. He's single and has no kids.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Look at this past summer. He totally disappeared from the face of the earth.

Not true, there were lots of sightings from MV, NYC and LA + photos with Maggie, Peter, Adam.

Anonymous said...

That is obtuse. Maggie & Peter are family and they are also part of Jake's safety net cover.

No, Jake suddenly hangs out with Maggie and Peter because they live in a family friendly 3,600 square foot, four-story house with a top-floor rental apartment. I have siblings with children, but I don't hang out with them. Because I'm 32 and single. My circle of friends are primarily single too. When I visited at Christmas I went crazy because of all the noise and kids running around. And, the person who made the comment above about how people with children change is absolutely right. My siblings and their husbands and wifes talk about either children or family related matters. Booorrrring. I wouldn't be surprised, at all, if Jake has a kid.

Anonymous said...

I wouldn't be surprised, at all, if Jake has a kid.

Base on what?
Jake didn't dump his family and friends who have kids and that suggests he has a kid?

Anonymous said...

Not true, there were lots of sightings from MV, NYC and LA + photos with Maggie, Peter, Adam.

No there were not. And, notice how you had to use the word "sightings". I think that's very telling. We used to get actual pictures of Jake going to parties and events. Or hanging out with buds. Now we get "sightings." Which as you know can be easily manipulated and strategically planted. Where was Jake through most of September, by the way? Oh, that's right he was supposedly "dating" Rachel Bilson but they were in hiding. On the down low. Riiiiiiiight.

Anonymous said...

9:46 AM - I'm sure you have an explanation for Jake's motorcycle too. I'm listening!

Anonymous said...

No there were not.

Please stop ignoring facts, that is beyond silly. Read WFT2 comments from that period, tweets, articles and photos are there.

And, notice how you had to use the word "sightings". I think that's very telling.
It is very telling is that you choose to ignore 2007, 2008 and 2009 when Jake was "parent" too and use one month to prove your "point".

Anonymous said...

Jake in 2010: Going out in Montreal all the time. Going out with singer Marcus. Going to concerts. Going out with Adam Levine.

Where are all those pictures of Jake going out all the time? There are 365 days in the year, you now. 24 hours in a day. Jake's public appearances have vanished compared to what they were prior to 2007. I think that's very telling. He wanted to be seen. Was ambitious when it came to his career. Now, not so much.

Anonymous said...

No there were not.
Please stop ignoring facts, that is beyond silly. Read WFT2 comments from that period, tweets, articles and photos are there.

And, notice how you had to use the word "sightings". I think that's very telling.
It is very telling that you choose to ignore 2007, 2008 and 2009 when Jake was "parent" too and use one month to prove your "point".

Anonymous said...

Just one single guy life example - with pictures:

January 15 - Breakfast In West Hollywood
January 16 - Lunch With Busy Philipps In West Hollywood
January 16 - Golden Globe Awards
January 17 - Out With Friend In Hollywood

Anonymous said...

Jake's public appearances have vanished compared to what they were prior to 2007.

Still ignoring reeking like crazy YEARS?

Anonymous said...

Let's be honest - without Ted's gossip NO ONE would ever think, suggest or mention the possibility of BT. NO ONE.

There are no rumors, no evidence, no traces, nothing to suggest that Jake hides a kid.

Anonymous said...

We have the evidence of the nanny in Paris, where Ava ran up to her in the video. And footprints. And sonograms.

Anonymous said...

It's call growing up, I hoe you don't expect jake to bahave the same way he did in 2006-2007.

And you can speculate all you want but using pics on IHJ to prove a point is ridiculous, they are just a moment and are usually pics of him taken where paps hang out, I suspect that he tries to avoid those places now if he can.

Jake hangs out in Brooklyn with Maggie and Co for the same reason he hung out in Manhattan/Tribeca: Maggie. She and Peter had a place in Tribeca and he stayed with them when he was there or with Chris when he had a place there.

Now that they are in Brooklyn he stays there, Jake never had a place in NY despite the speculation and he doesn't have one now. Thats why he is stays in Brooklyn and the LES where he has relatives as well, it's a place for him to stay.

Anonymous said...

10:16 AM - those things can be interpreted BT way, but are not proof.

Anonymous said...

10:16: I hope you are kidding, that was a photo-op, why would he drag BT and a nanny?

It wouldn't be the first time a young girl ran up to a woa=man with a kid, but you wouldn't know since you don't have a kid.

That was not a sonogram IMO but a prescription , no one who is trying to hide a secret would go to that clinic that is crawling with paps, use your brain.

Footprints?, LOL!!! if they were infant prints we know that Jake's friends have babies and guess what? Not all of Jake's freinds can be found on IHJ!!!!

Anonymous said...

There are no independent rumors of BT outdide of Ted so the jaustloons have to twist every "pic" as evidence but they know that BT doesn't exisits.

They keep pointing to Jake hanging with parents as proof, but can't explain why he is wasting time with them when he should be at home with his child instead.

Apparently the kid stays home with a nanny while he wanders around and stays in Brooklyn and Mr Soapy is in NC.

The jaustiloons make no sense.

Anonymous said...

10:24 has all the answers! So tell us, who is Jake screwing at the moment? LOL!!!

Anonymous said...

No, Jake suddenly hangs out with Maggie and Peter because they live in a family friendly 3,600 square foot, four-story house with a top-floor rental apartment. I have siblings with children, but I don't hang out with them. Because I'm 32 and single. My circle of friends are primarily single too. When I visited at Christmas I went crazy because of all the noise and kids running around. And, the person who made the comment above about how people with children change is absolutely right. My siblings and their husbands and wifes talk about either children or family related matters. Booorrrring. I wouldn't be surprised, at all, if Jake has a kid.

January 20, 2011 9:46 AM



Think my obtuse comment was misinterpreted. Maggie & Peter are part of Jake's safety net. They're also family which is also why Jake is seen with them.

But they also have a daughter who is "around" the age of BT. Ramona would be BT's cousin after all. It all works out.

Can also see Maggie being a babysitter for BT when needed.

Anonymous said...

Hai "Jack" - not over at GB brown nosing UV today?

Anonymous said...

Can you also see BT kept in Maggie's house all the time while everyone else goes out all the time?

Anonymous said...

Jack = 10:24 & 10:29 (it's the 3 year old mentality and grammar that give it away every time)

Anonymous said...

Can also see Maggie being a babysitter for BT when needed.

Can you also see BT kept in Maggie's house all the time while everyone else goes out?

Anonymous said...

I'm sure Jake explained to BT why he/she can't never ever go out with Ramona or with him.

Anonymous said...

Well the rope burn marks on BT's wrists can be covered with mineral make-up

Anonymous said...

There is no BT. Jake stays in NY for weeks at a time while his alleged partner is in NC. Where is this so-called BT, with a nanny in L.A.? And please don't say it's in NY. From what I hear, the Gyllenhaals-Sasgaards(sp?) in Park Slope along with Mama and various aunts, cousins in Brooklyn, etc are an open book. If there was a kid there would be talk. No way you can hide a kid that is almost four. Anyone that thinks otherwise obviously don't have kids.

I think the Jaustiloons are pissed because there don't seem to be as many pics of Jake wandering around doing nothing anymore to get their panties wet and when they are, he looks like crap.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
prairiegirl said...

Okay, I have to jump in for a moment.

10:16: I hope you are kidding, that was a photo-op, why would he drag BT and a nanny?

It wouldn't be the first time a young girl ran up to a woa=man with a kid, but you wouldn't know since you don't have a kid.


Look at how old Ava is in that Paris video. I am sorry but children that age do not run up to a total stranger with a baby and touch the baby! They may do it after having sat down for a few moments and having a conversation but they do not do what Ava did, if this woman/baby were total strangers.

Not only that, but notice the woman doesn't even look down. Jake and Reese don't even react. So Ava suddenly takes off running toward someone and they don't even react to see where she's headed or who she's running up to?

Ava clearly runs up to that woman, reaches up to touch the baby with familiarity, and then quickly pulls her hand back, as if remembering that she isn't supposed to show that she knows them.

Absolutely no doubt in my mind.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
prairiegirl said...

That's it - when there's not a reasonable, plausible argument, resort to name calling and ridicule.

As you were.

Anonymous said...

lighten up pg

Anonymous said...

Sure PG. Since Ted is the only source for this fanfic and Ava and I assume Deacon knows, perhaps we can contact the NE or Star with this. Send them the "evidence" tell them that Reese, her kids and most likely Ryan, Abby, the cast and crew of Nailed, Brothers, Pop, LAOD and SC all know as well because we know that Jake's and Austin family ain't going to spill!

Oh amd lets not forget cast and crew of How do you know, he had BT in that car with Paul Rudd!

Gee, with all that funny, not one peep, just Ted.

prairiegirl said...

lighten up pg

January 20, 2011 11:03 AM



Oh, I'm fine. I just don't want to interfere in your all's discussion because it was a good one.

And I think we all know how Jack is. Jack has to get in his "jaustiloon" plug and then get off on female sexual innuendo. I cannot be bothered with that kind of nonsense.

Anonymous said...

I was kinda thinking Eva Green also, for her green "cat" eyes, but Anne has that similar look too. I wonder if Naomi Watts is still going to be cast as well? :)

Anonymous said...

I'm not impressed with Eva Green, "Dreamers" sex scenes were so boring.

Anonymous said...

What did you expect? Eva Green was playing a virgin having sex for the first time in "The Dreamers". I've seen LAOD and Eva Green has a lot more sex appeal than Anne. She's very sensual. Both Eva and Anne have great boobs, though.

more details said...

Anne Hathaway is heading to "Glee," co-creator and writer Ryan Murphy confirmed to Access Hollywood on Sunday night.

"It is true," Ryan told Access at the FOX post-Golden Globes party. "She said it in the press that she wants to play Chris Colfer's lesbian aunt."

Ryan revealed that casting Anne on "Glee" happened on Sunday night, while the Globes telecast was still going on.

"She walked by our table and we have a mutual friend and I said, 'Do you really want to do it?' And she said, 'I do.' And I said, 'OK, we're gonna do it.'"

The "Glee" honcho said that they will likely film Anne's guest role in the coming weeks.

"I think we'll do it probably in a month and a half or so I have to talk to Anne about what she wants to sing. I'm sure she has ideas," he said. "I'm excited about that."

Anne actually revealed her interest in "Glee" on Jimmy Fallon's "Late Night with Jimmy Fallon" back in November.

"In my head, I've written a part for myself on 'Glee.' In my head I've cast myself on 'Glee' and I know what song I'd sing," she told Jimmy "I would wanna play Kurt's long-lost aunt, his mother's sister who is also gay, who comes back to help him deal with his sexuality, and I would sing, 'You Are Not Alone' from Stephen Sondheim's epic show 'Into the Woods.'"

Anonymous said...

What did you expect? Eva Green was playing a virgin having sex for the first time in "The Dreamers".

I didn't expect three young, good looking actors to make boring sex scenes, but that's exactly what they did.

Anonymous said...

Well, at least they felt more natural than the sex scenes in LAOD which, except for Jake's nakedness, weren't exciting either.

People said...

Taylor Swift & Jake Gyllenhaal: Back Together Again?

Is Taylor Swift giving Jake Gyllenhaal another chance?
The two stars, whose brief relationship fizzled in December, arrived quietly together on Wednesday at Bound'ry, a restaurant near Swift's Nashville condo, and were led back to a table for two, according to another patron.
"They did eat," the patron tells PEOPLE. "They were cordial to one another, but not affectionate."
The two were last spotted publicly together on Dec. 9.
Swift has been lying low in Nashville in recent days, rehearsing with her band for a concert on a Royal Caribbean cruise ship, where she will perform on Friday, and for the Asian leg of her Speak Now tour, which begins in Singapore on Feb. 9.

People

Anonymous said...

PrairieGirl, we could get REALLY lucky and have the 'you hags and fat bitches!' troll show up. That delinquent never gets old. Oh no wait...

I have no idea one way or another about Baby Tile but I would love it to be true and royally piss off all these little nazis that say it cannot possibly be.

It would be so funny. Not to mention cool.

Why isn't Jake being seen with Adam Levine now that he is in LA?Instead Levine is making sure to be seen making out with his girlfriend. I think he's looking out for his own "straight image" right now by NOT being seen with Jake because people were starting to wonder out loud about him and Jake.

Meh, Levine has had his own gay rumours for years. He's truly a pathetic creature. He's got a face even I'd like to smack. Smarmy, greasy little git. Next.

Jake will be auditioning his next beard very soon. That's unless latest alleged beardee Camilla Belle takes the job offer up.

Which would of course further 'devastate' Taylor Swift. Can anyone KNOW such heartache and despair? You know, cancer sufferers, folks that have lost children, rape victimes, pale into insignificance next to Taylor's barren wilderness of 'real world' suffering over Jake and precisely three coffee dates in New York.

Come on, PR shills of the world, give it a fucking rest. People are losing their homes and dying out there.

Anonymous said...

Taylor Swift & Jake Gyllenhaal: Back Together Again?

I hope this is just another People magazine made up sighting.

Anonymous said...

^If it's in People, it's PR planted and approved.

Anonymous said...

"They did eat," the patron tells PEOPLE. "They were cordial to one another, but not affectionate."

Yes because the job of any patron that goes to stuff their stomach with fine or otherwise cuisine is to notice how 'affectionate' other people are being with one another.

And isn't it lucky People have found a random patron who has been following the saga enough to know they have split up. What an amazing coincidence.

Jake, I have to hand it to you, somebody is writing you real life comedy roles and you are becoming funnier by the day.

Anonymous said...

I hope this is just another People magazine made up sighting.

Good grief, you don't have to hope. It's a bloody flashing beacon of PR shill planted nonsense by default of it being in People.

I figure they feel they've gone too far making Jake out to be a 'heartless creep' so they send the two off for an amicable fictional dinner, just so the world knows Jake is not really quite as nasty as all that.

Anonymous said...

^ Sorry I forgot to put 'split up' in huge inverted commas.

prairiegirl said...

I figure they feel they've gone too far making Jake out to be a 'heartless creep' so they send the two off for an amicable fictional dinner, just so the world knows Jake is not really quite as nasty as all that.

That could be. I have no idea what is up with this.

Agree with 1:37pm though that if it's in People.com like this, though, it's approved.

prairiegirl said...

Sorry - too many "though" 's in that last comment.

Anonymous said...

I figure they feel they've gone too far making Jake out to be a 'heartless creep' so they send the two off for an amicable fictional dinner, just so the world knows Jake is not really quite as nasty as all that.

IA. The "cordial but not affectionate" is so obvious, lol. Like a random diner would say those exact words. jfc, doesn't he ever get tired of playing games?

People said...

Taylor Swift & Jake Gyllenhaal: Back Together Again?

People edited the article and added this:

"And another source tells PEOPLE that they seemed friendly. "There was no holding hands, but they seemed happy together," the source says. "They sat next to the fireplace just chatting away.""

Anonymous said...

This was a sighting posted on twitter last night. People must have been trolling twitter last night.

Anonymous said...

Famewhore Jake is really desperate for publicity.

destiny said...

I have a lot of friends with kids, and of course you still see your old friends when that happens, but not nearly as often as when they were childless. Even if you like kids and like hanging out with them as a family, it can get boring. They're also too busy with school and kids, and arranging play dates, and they have to arrange for sitters if they go out at night, so they don't end up doing a lot of things like going to the movies (except children's movies), and their world starts to revolve around their children. Unless you like talking 24/7 about children, school, children's movies, etc., it's just natural to not spend as much time with those friends. Not to mention people with kids make friends with their kids playmates, the parents they see at school activities, etc, and they tend to spend more time with other families than with their single friends.

Perfect example--I saw Maggie and Peter in a museum when she was pretty far along in her pregnancy. It was during a time when Jake was definitely in NYC--but Jake wasn't with them. They were with another couple in which the woman looked like she was at the same stage of pregnancy as Maggie--quite a coincidence if it was an old friend. More likely it was someone she met in a birthing class.

Back in 2006, when Maggie was pregnant, Jake only spent two weeks at a time in NYC. It was almost like clockwork--two weeks in NYC, two weeks in LA. In interviews Jake said he was helping out Maggie while Peter was away working. So why not stay in NYC the whole time? But he didn't. And that was before Reeke, so his time in LA was not driven by that. That's when we also got all the hanging out with McBongo and others.

Anonymous said...

"They sat next to the fireplace just chatting away.""

LOL. This is supposed to show that she's not devastated and that he's not a creep. Too bad Jake's people don't realize that it doesn't matter what he does now - he's damaged himself irreparably and will forever now be a Laughingstock and an obvious famewhore.

Lamey said...

Formalities or second chances?

Does she have a song called Second Chances? Because she's about to.
People.com is reporting that Taylor Swift and Jake Gyllenhaal hooked up last night in Nashville, seen together at a restaurant. They weren't tonguing each other or anything but it was just the two of them.
Previously on Swifty hearts Jakey...
He was embarrassed to be dating her and broke up with her over text message. Then she told her friends to tell the world that he played with her feelings.
So is this a formal face to face split, like let's make this official? Or are they working it out?
Taylor is the type to need that final final final "talk", you know? For closure and sh-t.
"I want you to tell me to my face.".
She's also the type to get sweeted back by his crinkly eyes and dimples, even though he was supposedly flirting with every young attractive actress on Golden Globe weekend.
Ugh. Either you're a pimp or you're not. Make up your f-cking mind.

Lainey

prairiegirl said...

Maybe the spin is going to be that Jake was "miserable w/o ol' Tay and after the GG's, he realized this", thus the big trip to Nashville to try and patch things up.

Tay goes on tour and Jaylor can be back on without Jake having to go through more coffee photo ops, yet Jaylor will be "back on".

But why go through the big "break-up" rag cover stories? It makes no sense.

What a bunch of crock it all is. Does Jake have nothing better to do than waste fuel flying to Nashville for a peace treaty summit?

Anonymous said...

Ugh. Either you're a pimp or you're not.

LMAO! Is this idiot serious?

OT said...

Wal-Mart, the nation's largest grocer, says it will reformulate thousands of products to make them healthier and push its suppliers to do the same, joining first lady Michelle Obama's effort to combat childhood obesity.

Anonymous said...

Can someone as famous as Jake hide a kid for 4 years?

Anonymous said...

"Does Jake have nothing better to do than waste fuel flying to Nashville for a peace treaty summit?"

Apparently not.

Anonymous said...

Being a father is all that matters to Jake, now. It's not his straight image that he's trying to protect. It's his children (because I think he has more than one). He'll do anything for them. Including, making himself into a laughing-stock and imploding his career. People were talking about this earlier and, of course, were shot down. Jake is trying to distract people away from his bizarre, hermit-like behavior. On one hand, I admire him...a little. On the other, I think his decision-making leaves something to be desired. He's in this so deep, I don't think he knows how to extricate himself. I wish someone would "out" him to save him from himself.

Anonymous said...

Can someone as famous as Jake hide a kid for 4 years?

Yes, he can and has.

Anonymous said...

Everyone can hide a kid, but who would do that to his own child and why?

Anonymous said...

Being a father is all that matters to Jake, now. It's not his straight image that he's trying to protect.

It is all about his straight image and cheap publicity. How could making a fool of himself with Swift be about Jake's kid??? There is no need to distract people from kid rumors because there are no kid rumors.

Anonymous said...

"Does Jake have nothing better to do than waste fuel flying to Nashville for a peace treaty summit?"
Apparently not.


Apparently not is right. Someone asked him at the GGs the other night what his next movie was and he didn't have an answer and had to give some lame response about looking at a number of things. Pathetic. He should have a list of projects lined up.

Anonymous said...

Didn't Jake / Reese pull this exact same move? A big break-up story a few months in, quickly followed by being back together? It was probably in the script from the beginning. That way, they could happily spend their birthdays and holidays apart, but rekindle just in time for Taylor to spend most of the year traveling on tour.

Anonymous said...

Didn't Jake / Reese pull this exact same move?

No, because Reeke break-up was months before showmance officially started.

destiny said...

Being a father is all that matters to Jake, now. It's not his straight image that he's trying to protect.

I totally disagree.

And I don't get what that even means.


If being a father was all that mattered to Jake, he wouldn't be hiding his children. Only someone who is ashamed of who they are and/or is afraid that he won't get the big A-list projects would hide his children. And at this point he's probably locked into doing it by his bearding contract with Reese, because it certainly isn't looking like he's going to be an A-list star.

Anonymous said...

Let me get this straight, Jake is hiding his kid(s) because he is ashamed of them. Alright. Begs the question, why having them in the frist place? Anyway... Since I strongly believe Jake will marry a woman and have kids with her in his 30ies (he said his main goal is to have kids in the next 10 years), where does that leave his Baby Tiles? Will he hide them forever or "adopt" them when he starts a new family?

Anonymous said...

There is no need to distract people from kid rumors because there are no kid rumors.

I'm finding this conversation very interesting. Of course, there are kid rumors. That's why people are talking about it! Hellllooooo.

I'm pretty new to this Toothy thing, but I think some of these posters are getting it right. Jake figures people know he's gay. You would have to be an idiot not to see it. Yet, he keeps up with these ridiculous fauxmances. No one else does this in Hollywood. Having a family that he wants to hide would explain a lot, though. Would explain this extended family thing too with Maggie and Peter. Sorta like a kibbutz arrangement. Jake is, after all, Jewish. Obviously, there are a few who absolutely hate the idea. That's really apparent. But, did anyone see those smug expressions on Jake's face this past week at those parties? He knew this was coming and played his part to perfection. I bet he has the balls to do it too. Jake's enjoying driving everyone crazy on the blogs and celebrity sites.

Anonymous said...

Who besides OMG and WFT 2 posters believe there are toddlers that Jake G. is hiding somewhere?

Anonymous said...

Jake said recently he doesn't consider himself an A-list star so I don't think this is about famewhoring or career ambition. If it were, where are all those upcoming projects. Having a "re-hook" up with Swifty now...just when she's leaving the country is a perfect setup. We don't have to wonder why he's not dating because he's in love with his globe hopping, superstar Swifty.

US Weekly magazine - Jake the ladies' man said...

"Jake Gyllenhaal Ladies' Man"

US Weekly magazine scan

Anonymous said...

Why break up in the first place, when both knew she had a world tour coming up? Makes no sense.
If they were truly dating, i think this might be the proper ending that she probably deserves. Maybe someone talked him into ending it the right way?

Anonymous said...

US Weekly magazine scan

What a small little tidbit. I wouldn't even call it an article.

Anonymous said...

Who besides OMG and WFT 2 posters believe there are toddlers that Jake G. is hiding somewhere?

Doesn't matter. I wouldn't have even known about Toothy, if it weren't for Ted's Blind Item so that's not a persuasive argument. Ted was on top of this story early on and then the Hollywood machine closed ranks around Jake. Kids are usually off limits anyway. Paps sure surround Jake day and night, however. They are looking for something big. I think OMG posted a video the other day, where the paps were literally ecstatic that they "caught" Jake. They were screaming "You're too late," and laughing hysterically. Jake probably had to pay them off not to publish the photo.

Anonymous said...

My Mom doesn't follow gossip, at all. The other day, we got on the subject of Travolta and the people cover, and I told her about how he is actually gay. And she says, "You know who else has to be gay - that Jake Gyllenhaal. His relationships seem so fake. I can't believe he's even trying to hide it."
Seriously. My Mom has never heard of Ted Casablanca. The closest she comes is People in the doctor's office.

Anonymous said...

Jake said recently he doesn't consider himself an A-list star so I don't think this is about famewhoring or career ambition. If it were, where are all those upcoming projects. Having a "re-hook" up with Swifty now...just when she's leaving the country is a perfect setup. We don't have to wonder why he's not dating because he's in love with his globe hopping, superstar Swifty.

Jake can't get any kind of film work?

If this were about Jake getting film work, how is being down in Nashville going to get him work? He needs to be in LA passing out his resume - not in Tennessee sipping java by a fireplace with a country/pop singer.

Anonymous said...

Why break up in the first place, when both knew she had a world tour coming up? Makes no sense. If they were truly dating, i think this might be the proper ending that she probably deserves. Maybe someone talked him into ending it the right way?

I think they broke up so Jake didn't have to be with her for those milestone birthdays (Taylor's 21st birthday and Jake's 30th). That would have required a lot of work and coordination. Never mind the Christmas/New Years' holidays. His special occasion concession was that absurd Thanksgiving holiday photo op. I think Jake demanded that he be allowed to be with his own family during the holidays. And, I don't mean Maggie's. Now, when all the special birthdays and holidays are over, they're starting to ramp things up again. Just when she's starting her World Tour. How convenient.

Anonymous said...

Someone should slap some sense into Jake and tell him to work again (I mean on films).
What a lazy lil f..

Anonymous said...

^^I mean as actor, writer, director whatever, just work dude!

Anonymous said...

4:46 PM - do they allow BT to leave the basement for those special occasions? Or the family joins him/her in the basement?

Anonymous said...

If this were about Jake getting film work

I think you missed the point. I'm agreeing with you. This is not about Jake's film career. He wants to have a public relationship so he doesn't have to be seen out and about. Doesn't have to be seen on the prowl. It's a perfect set-up for a family man, who doesn't want to have to work at being single and available. He's off the market, again. So no need to wonder when you don't see those hetero moves at clubs, events or restaurants. Tay Tay has stolen his heart. Blech!

Anonymous said...

The "basement" nonsense is getting pretty tiresome. People are making some thoughtful comments and the troll attacks to interrupt the discussion. I'm beginning to think there is a BT after this.

Celebitchy said...

Taylor Swift & Jake Gyllenhaal met in Nashville for a post-phone-dump meal
Lots of people are billing this story as “ZOMG Jakey & Swifty FOREVER” but if you read the brief report carefully, there’s nothing to indicate that. People Magazine claims (suspiciously) that Jake Gyllenhaal flew to Nashville yesterday to have lunch with Taylor Swift, the chick he dated for less than two months and then dumped over the phone. Considering Jake was butching it up, flirting with every available vagine (“Ew,” Jake says) at the Golden Globes - while also bringing an “ex-girlfriend” as a date - it really didn’t look like Jake was mourning this relationship at all. Meanwhile, Swifty has been a mess, and she’s been diligently working on the definitive breakup song which will include the words “Brooklyn latte” and “Camilla Belle” and “Gaylord”. So… this just seems like Jake went to Nashville as a stop-gap measure, so he wouldn’t look the asshat who dumped a 12-year-old over the phone.
[From People]
“They did eat…They were cordial to one another, but not affectionate,” says Jake’s publicist, who rues the day he ever arranged Swifty as Jake’s “girlfriend”. The publicist them screamed into the phone “ARE YOU BITCHES HAPPY NOW?!?”
But yeah… Jake and Swifty aren’t getting back together, in my opinion. He realized that the whole situation made him look terrible, and he’s trying to do some PR stuff to make it look like he’s not a dick.
UPDATE: People Mag just updated their story to include this “eyewitness” quote: “There was no holding hands, but they seemed happy together. They sat next to the fireplace just chatting away.” Ugh. What kind of game are you playing, Jake?

Celebitchy

Anonymous said...

The "basement" nonsense is getting pretty tiresome.

Really? Why are you ignoring questions you can't answer? Because you have no answer to why would Jake keep his own kid in the house and enjoy going out with Maggie, Peter and Ramona?

Anonymous said...

I think you missed the point. I'm agreeing with you.

I copied/pasted the wrong comment! Yes, we agree! :)

Anonymous said...

The "basement" nonsense is getting pretty tiresome.

Tell us where was BT all that time while Jake was in NYC?

destiny said...

I was going through some old dvds I use to record TV and came across Jake's interview on Letterman for LAOD. For me it was interesting to watch now because during movie promo I go into overload mode. I remember at the time people talked about it because Jake has that whole spiel about his beard and his management being concerned because people were wondering if he was unhappy. The thing I didn't remember was his saying they weren't happy about the beard because with a sexy movie coming out, his fans would want to see him looking sexy, i.e., without the beard. Jake said that made him want to keep the beard even more.

It sounded like a real fuck you to what the fans want. Given that he is doing movies like POP and LAOD, not small indie films where fans don't matter as much, it struck me as really odd and misguided.

And now here he is with Taylor again, someone most people hated seeing him with.

Is it any wonder his career is in trouble with an attitude like that?

Anonymous said...

Jake Nasty!

Anonymous said...

Jake and Taylor are not getting back together, this was a break up meal for him to look better after the rumored text message break up. I'm pretty convinced.

Anonymous said...

Remember that video of Jake at Dance Party Russia? Just thought about that. Gave me a good laugh.

Anonymous said...

If he wasn't most likely gay, you'd think he's a player in disguise. Sorta, "I want the perfect woman and baby", but infact enjoys flirting and sleeping around as much. He did say he "used to be" into casual sex.

Anonymous said...

Players don't hang out with couples so much - third wheel. Players don't talk about mommy, daddy, sis and brother in law non stop because they have nothing else going on in their private lifes. Players are seen with women and don't need their PR to plant stories about what studs they are.

Anonymous said...

If they were truly dating, i think this might be the proper ending that she probably deserves. Maybe someone talked him into ending it the right way?

Showmances are business, not relationships.

Anonymous said...

^^ PR business.

Nashville said...

Dinner with Tay-Tay? Yep, PR mandated get yer ass to Nashville... we want you looking good in the break up song!

prairiegirl said...

Showmances are business, not relationships.


That's a great point and I mean that seriously.

Because why would Jake fly all the way to Nashville in order to just mend a little image problem?

Anonymous said...

I don't think you all can have it both ways when it comes to toothy and baby tile. IF you believe Jake is Toothy then there is a baby tile. You all who dismiss baby tile as Ted C's bullshit then you also dismiss Jake as Toothy. Ted has said many times in his column that baby tile exists as a human being and is in the lives of Toothy and Grey.

I don't see how you can dismiss those who do believe in baby tile because they are using the same source for the whole Toothy Tile Saga, Ted Casablanca. No other gossip site talks about Toothy, its Ted's baby, no pun intended. YOu can't pick and choose what you want to believe about Toothy from Ted because it doesn't make sense or you don't see how someone could hide a child.

Can I say Sandra Bullock and more recently Nicloe Kidman and Keith Urban?

In my opinion if you don't believe in baby tile than you don't believe Ted C is credible, therefore how can you believe Toothy Tile exist?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
destiny said...

There was an article in the style section of the NYT today about Just Jared that I thought was interesting. Celebs love him (no surprise), he has five employees, and the site is raking in over a million a year in revenue.

Nice Bloggers Don't Finish Last

Anonymous said...

Jake is hiding a baby. I believe it. I think there is only one baby. The kid is probably about 3 now. That's probably why he is papped so much, hoping to get a picture of the rumored kid. I;m sure they do sometimes, and get a cool $10,000 for it as a payoff.

It's also why Jake needs to make money - it takes money to hide a kid. He doesn't have expensive tastes. He rides the subway, eats at normal restaurants, and drives an Audi. That money is going somewhere.

I wonder though - where does Jake live? I never see pics of him leaving his home in LA. Is he behind a gate? In a gated community? Anyone know? There needs to be a way for the nanny to get in and out with the kid without being papped.

Anonymous said...

Jake lives under my bed and BT is locked in the cellar with the rats

prairiegirl said...

There needs to be a way for the nanny to get in and out with the kid without being papped.

I don't know. But Jake has been seen driving two different colored Q7's. Maybe Jake leaves the house in one and the nanny leaves in the other?

Just an idea.

BT hidden in the pantry said...

Where's my bottle, I haven'r been fed on 3 years!

Anonymous said...

I'm 75% of the way there on Baby Tile. (

for the record, I don't think Toothy's existence rests on Baby Tile's - the info has been too vague. And Jake is gay, Toothy or not. I don't need a Ted Casablanca blind vice to know that.)

As a mum myself, what I don't understand is Jake's travel schedule and lunch schedule. Boy goes out to lunch all. the. time. Like, everyday. Maybe lunchtime is the kid's naptime. Or, maybe the kid is in preschool (probably).

Smelly BT said...

My pamper needs changing and daddy is in nashville with that little girl!

Anonymous said...

I have gone back and forth on the existence of Baby Tile(s) over the years. But, I told a friend that when the "breakup" was announced a few weeks back, the timing was too convenient before the Golden Globes. And, that if Jake ended up getting back together with Swifty, before she went on tour, then that would seal the deal for me. Jake's hiding something big. This Nashville pilgrimmage proves it. Just being closeted and having a boyfriend doesn't qualify for such elaborate storytelling and timing.

People pretty much universally hate Jaylor. Jake was called a perv. and sometimes even worse. Yet, now we get a sighting of them having dinner together, happy and chatting in front of the fireplace. Please. Didn't Jake say he was a very private person? If he wanted just to apologize he could have done that it private. Like he broke up with her in private. He's not hiding that he's gay. That ship sailed long ago. He's hiding a family. H.I.S. and I'm assuming Austin Nichols since that's the BFF who pretty much disappeared from the landscape of Jake's life in 2007 too.

Anonymous said...

^^^ total Bs and Rubbish!

Jake has no child and Austin Nichols is dating Sophia Bush! Some are just gonna have to deal with it. Some are just so hooked on the Ted C idea that he put in their heads, and now it just has to be true. It just has to be...

Well I say, the oceans will freeze over if Jake has a child.
All of the theories are just far fetched as they come.
Posters who believe that a hansome single guy celeb would invest his time with a surrogate to carry a child for 9 months and a Bf who is constantly with a woman, then he's jet setting from coast to coast is cute and exceptable need their head checked.

Then they may need to take a breather away from the Jake sites and get grip on reality.

Anonymous said...

Austin Nichols is dating Sophia Bush!

Now, who needs to get a grip on reality. Sophia is Austin's beard and Austin is as gay as glitter.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Believe what you want Sophin lover but Austin and Sophia's relationship is more than suspicious.

They have not been dating for years as Sophia claims since (at least) Sophia has had other boyfriends during that time. Also during his first year on OTH Austin hung out with a totally different crowd. Sophin was created when Brooke and Julian became the main characters and because people mix up fact and fiction it's a good marketing strategy to claim the actors are really doing it too. No more Southern Gothic, enter Brulian on and off screen. Since they were already friends they can fake the relationship better than Jake. And Austin knows a white (or worse) lie here and there is sometimes necessary to get the job done.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Scott Caan circa 1998 said...

NEW YORK POST, October 4, 1998 ---- FLEDGLING

Hollywood actor Scott Caan, son of big-screen tough guy James Caan, didn't make his father proud by getting arrested after a boozy bar brawl last week. Caan, 23, was arrested after a punch-up with James Alleyna in a West Hollywood bar called the Firehouse. Reports following the incident claimed Caan had gone ballistic after Alleyna attempted to hit on Caan's date. In fact, the Firehouse draws a primarily gay clientele, and the date referred to in police reports was Caan's companion. New police details indicate that Caan and the man he was with that evening, Ross Porterfield, were both arrested for assaulting Alleyna and a friend, Joshua Sher. Shortly before 2 a.m., Sher allegedly tried to put the moves on Caan's pal by asking him to dance. Caan then approached Sher, who was sitting at a table, and began yelling, police say. One witness claims Caan shouted, This is my lover - what are you doing? Before long, fisticuffs ensued. According to the Los Angeles County Sheriff's office, when Alleyna tried to intervene, he was knocked to the ground, at which point club security stepped in. But as Caan and Porterfield were being shown the door, the couple and several other unidentified men jumped on Alleyna and Sher, rendering Alleyna unconscious and knocking Sher to the ground. Deputies caught Caan and Porterfield as they tried to flee the scene. Caan and Porterfield were held on US$20,000 bail each, which they both posted the next day. Following the incident, articles referred simply to Caan's date - making no mention of his companion's gender. But when word got out that the fight had broken out at the Firehouse, club insiders quickly started putting two and two together. Scoffed one late-night denizen: That boy was there with his man, and everyone got into a good 'ol catfight. Police reports also refer to Caan's lover only as his date, but Deputy Sheriff Boris Nikolof commented that the phrasing certainly is interesting. While I can't say that occurred to me, now that you mention it, there are a lot of gay bars in West Hollywood. In 1995, Caan starred in A Boy Called Hate, a box office bomb in which he played the leading man role to buxom beauty Missy Crider. Laughs one critic who saw the film, It was just totally implausible. Caan is so incredibly handsome, but you just never in a million years believed he was interested in this girl. You could tell something was up. Neither Caan nor Porterfield could be reached for comment. Calls placed to the Firehouse were not returned.

Hollywood Life said...

Jake Gyllenhaal Follows Taylor Swift Up To Her Apartment After Their Date! Exclusive Details!

Has Taylor forgiven him for breaking her heart or is he just trying to avoid being the subject of her next song?
Looks like things may be on the mend for Taylor Swift and Jake Gyllenhaal. The pair dined at Nashville hotspot, The Bound’ry, yesterday and an insider tells us, “They were spotted last night around 9:30PM for a late dinner. The restaurant wasn’t very busy and they were left to dine in peace.” But what’s even more interesting is what happened after the date!
People Magazine says that while the former lovebirds did have dinner together they were “cordial to one another [but they] were not affectionate. There was no holding hands, but they seemed happy together.”
But HollywoodLife.com has exclusively learned that the mood took a turn for the romantic following their leisurely dinner. Our source reveals that as the pair left the restaurant, “They were seen crossing the street together arm in arm to Swift’s condo at The Adelicia, which is directly across the street from The Bound’ry.”
The insider thinks the night may have even gotten steamier when Jake and Taylor “went upstairs together and Jake was not spotted leaving the building anytime soon.”
So has Jake successfully begged for Taylor’s forgiveness and made up with the blonde songstress or have his pleas for a possible reconciliation fallen upon deaf ears? I guess we’ll be hearing a song about it revealing the torrid details soon enough!

Should Taylor Take Jake Back?
Yes, This pair belongs together 59.76%
No, He had his chance 40.24%

Hollywood Life

Anonymous said...

LOL!

Anonymous said...

“...Jake was not spotted leaving the building anytime soon.”

^Taylor has a creepy human-sized birdcage in her apartment (for real: "The little birdcage on the floor of video-Taylor's bedroom may be an homage to the human-sized birdcage that is in Taylor's actual apartment. No, seriously, boys. The girl who wrote "Forever and Always" has a cage in her house that you can fit into. Run." link).

Maybe the beard locked Jake in there!

Anonymous said...

Actor Scott Caan arrives at the 68th Annual Golden Globe Awards held at The Beverly Hilton hotel on January 16, 2011. He was nominated for a Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting TV Actor.

Scott Caan posing with his beard

Anonymous said...

'Gulliver,' 'Persia,' 'Narnia' Rank Among the Big Botches of 2010

The following are some of 2010's lowlights...

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time - As an example of this movie's incompetence, looking at last spring's outdoor advertising, one would have thought it was called "May 28," which was in giant type. Turns out that was the release date, and the title was in fact Prince of Persia, which was treated as if it were a brand so established that people would just know it from the slightest of visual cues. That wasn't the case: Jerry Bruckheimer's adaptation of some video game needed all the help it could get from square one, not a marketing campaign that took the audience for granted. Disney's ads were incoherent, visually and in terms of story, and they lacked any striking spectacle in their golden brown blur. The backers even had the audacity to think that Jake Gyllenhaal was the equivalent of Johnny Depp. This all led to an uneventful $90.8 million gross, dashing dreams of a new franchise.

Bankability: Actors that each had two duds in 2010 included ... Jake Gyllenhaal (Prince of Persia, Love and Other Drugs)

BoxOfficeMojo

Anonymous said...

^^ How nice!

Anonymous said...

Scott Caan posing with his beard

How nice!

Anonymous said...

Here is a link to an article in The Advocate from 1998 re Scott Caan fighting over his boyfriend

Advocate article 1998

Anonymous said...

He's not hiding that he's gay. That ship sailed long ago. He's hiding a family.

"Dating" women and "flirting" with every woman in sight = hiding that he's gay.
Jake could hide 5 kids without doing showmances.
In fact doing showmances is an argument against BT - high profile showmancing equals media and paparazzi attention and you don't want that when you have family to hide.

«Oldest ‹Older   1201 – 1400 of 1449   Newer› Newest»