Sunday 19 December 2010

Happy Birthday Jake Gyllenhaal!

Honesty has a beautiful and refreshing simplicity about it. No ulterior motives. No hidden meanings. An absence of hypocrisy, duplicity, political games, and verbal superficiality. As honesty and real integrity characterize our lives, there will be no need to manipulate others.

- Chuck Swindoll

1,544 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   601 – 800 of 1544   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

The gay rumors were started with Ted's TT BV after Jake finished filming BBM.

That's a lie. The gay rummors started with Donnie Darko.

Anonymous said...

2:05 PM - I'm 100% sure Jake faked a relationship with Witherspoon. He is faking a relationship with Swift. Anyone who is interested in Jake and gossip can see that. Jake is gay. Ted has nothing to do with Jake's gayness and bearding.

Anonymous said...

Every male Hollywood actor had gay rumors at some point. The real persistent ones with Jaek started with Ted's BVs.

Anonymous said...

Every male Hollywood actor had gay rumors at some point.

Not true.

Anonymous said...

But was Ted really honest in his first BVs or exaggerated or even made some stuff up?

Does it matter?

Did you see Jake and Swift's pictures in Us Weekly? You doubt Jake's gayness after that obvious fakery #27? No one should.

Anonymous said...

Chamberlain belongs to a different generation--remember that.

Then Chamberlain needs to preface his response with a huge qualifying statement. Like maybe, "Well, things have changed a lot over the past 50 years and, hopefully, they'll continue to do so." Instead of acting like social change is frozen in time and there's really no hope for closeted leading men to make a difference.

Anonymous said...

Did you see Jake and Swift's pictures in Us Weekly? You doubt Jake's gayness after that obvious fakery #27? No one should.

In case he's not bearding, there's the possibilities that he either loves the attention that dating very famous women brings (photo ops included). Or he didn't call the papz (with TS specifically) and papz got wind TS was in Brooklyn and the pics were withheld from posting on the net in order to sell them to the highest offering magazine? Everything's possible.

Anonymous said...

^^withheld from the papz

Anonymous said...

things have changed a lot over the past 50 years

There were no openly gay movie A-listers 50 years ago.
50 years later there are no openly gay movie A-listers.

Anonymous said...

If you look at this picture, Jake is not happy to be papped. He pressed his upper and lower lips together and his lips are white.

http://www.iheartjakemedia.com/displayimage.php?album=1808&pos=33

(But most here probably will disagree or say he acted annoyed)

Anonymous said...

In case he's not bearding, there's the possibilities that he either loves the attention that dating very famous women brings (photo ops included). Or he didn't call the papz (with TS specifically) and papz got wind TS was in Brooklyn and the pics were withheld from posting on the net in order to sell them to the highest offering magazine? Everything's possible.

You are kidding, aren't you? The timing, the frozen leaves on the curbside in both photos (the Swyll fake smile T-day sidewalk stroll and the later afternoon Maggie/Ramona-Tay Tay "just one big happy family" pose). The obvious rollout during the week of Swifty's album release and Jake's publicity for LaOD. The planted stories about apple pickin', ice cream lickin'. Jake's bearding history is well established and so is the strategic selection of these fake relationships. I side with the stories that indicate Jake wanted to come out in 2006, but he was shoved back in by his people and homophobic Hollywood.

Anonymous said...

If you look at this picture, Jake is not happy to be papped.

LOL!

Jake wasn't papped, he and the beard posed for photos, photos they arranged and sold to Us Weekly.

Anonymous said...

There were no openly gay movie A-listers 50 years ago.
50 years later there are no openly gay movie A-listers.


Exactly! My point is about American society in general, not Hollywood. Yet, the movie industry is still as entrenched in the closet as if Stonewall never occurred. So Chamberlain could have acknowledged these strides. Yet, he acts like people's views have not shifted at all. This misrepresentation allows him to say that it's still too dangerous for leading men to come out. Bullsh*t!

Anonymous said...

Everything's possible.

No, Jake's and other Hollywood phonies whoring showmance ways are well known by now.

Anonymous said...

All you need is to compare twitter pictures of Jake and the beard looking bored and "happy" pictures for Us Weekly. And remember how Jake didn't bother with beard's birthday.

destiny said...

ITA 2:44. I get why gay sites want to interview out actors, but they should aclnowledge that things have changed.

It would be like me interviewing my mom and holding her out as any authority on rap when she doesn't even like rock music and her musical tastes are stuck in the 50s.

Anonymous said...

This misrepresentation allows him to say that it's still too dangerous for leading men to come out. Bullsh*t!

But he has a point - in 100 years of Hollywood there is ZERO openly gay leading men and I'm sure actors would prefer to stop hiding.

destiny said...

Chamberlain worked primarily in tv. But to hear him speak you would thin there was no NPH, no Bomer, no half the cast of Glee....

tweet said...

effedparkslope: Got a tip that Jake Gyllenhaal was just spotted @unionmarket loading up on snowpocalypse provisions #parkslope
about 2 hours ago

Anonymous said...

NPH, no Bomer, no half the cast of Glee...

Sorry, but they aren't leading man–type actors / aren't out. John Barrowman?

Anonymous said...

But he has a point - in 100 years of Hollywood there is ZERO openly gay leading men and I'm sure actors would prefer to stop hiding.

And, there were no openly gay, active servicemen until Daniel Choi had the courage to come out on the Rachel Maddow show in March. In other words, there wasn't, until there was. Now, DADT has been repealed. In other words, how long are leading men in Hollywood going to continue to act like nothing's change and that's why it's still too "dangerous" to come out. No, they need to begin to play their part in advancing society forward. Man up, as it were.

Anonymous said...

Sorry, but they aren't leading man–type actors

With that line of reasoning, no A-List actor will ever need to come out. Destiny is agreeing, and I am too, with the poster who said that Chamberlain was being misleading. He acted like there has been no progress in the area of open celebrities. So what, if no leading man has had the courage to lead on this subject. Kinda ironic when you think about it. They want the six figure salaries but don't want the hassle of advancing society forward on this very important civil rights issue. What did John Kennedy say about the privilege in society? Ah, yes. "To those whom much is given, much is expected."

Anonymous said...

They want the six figure salaries but don't want the hassle of advancing society forward on this very important civil rights issue.

Exactly, actors are part of the problem.

Anonymous said...

" It's still dangerous for an actor to talk about that in our extremly misguided culture"

WHAT???


I have'nt posted here in a long while but oh my, I could'nt resist when I read this:

Chamberlain should be encouraging young actors to be true to themselves, not encouraging homophobic HW to continue keeping the old perception that most people really care what an actor's sexual pref is in this day and age. Our so-called "mis-guided culture" has evolved into a more educated, more inclusive one. We're not in the 50's anymore. Over 70% of Americans were in favor of the repeal of DADT. He and HW need to catch up with general society instead.

....and this..." Please, don't pretend that we're suddenly all wonderfully, blissfully accepted"

There will always be those homophobes who will never get with the program, he has a point there and of course it still remains a very personal decision for an gay actor to come out and no one should be forced, but, still, I find it appalling that older gays like Chamberlain, who like old HW, are out of touch would encourage younger actors such as a gay Jake G. and others to hide who they really are? This often forces great actors into humiliating and ridiculous "bearding" and "showmance crap", publicity stunts etc.., just old HW games that anyone can see is fake. It's all for nil and not believable anyway. Either you can act and carry a film, or you can't and no amount of fake publicity in US mag or other rags will change that.. In fact, these games may turn out to have the opposite effect than what is intended as they often insult the intelligence of the ticket buying public, turning fans against the actor or actress.

I've never heard anyone say " I'm going to pay to watch the film because the leading man is gay or straight." or "I'm not gonna go" for the same reason. People pay to go to see good, well made films with great performances that keep them entertained for a couple hours regardless of the lead actor/actress's personal sexual ID period. most people shrug it off and say "so what? aint my business who he/she sleeps with. it's a great film!. I loved it". Is this not what really counts Dr Kildare??

Anonymous said...

And, there were no openly gay, active servicemen until Daniel Choi had the courage to come out on the Rachel Maddow show in March.

You can't really compare the Army and Hollywood - there is no official DADT in Hollywood and there are no politicians who care, want and can overturn Hollywood's DADT.

Anonymous said...

Either you can act and carry a film, or you can't and no amount of fake publicity in US mag or other rags will change that.

That is true.

But ... Studio can always hire straight or closeted actor and openly gay actor(s) can't do anything about that.

Anonymous said...

I've never heard anyone say " I'm going to pay to watch the film because the leading man is gay or straight."

From time to time I read comments about Ricky Martin on Latin countries tabloid / gossip / news sites.
I think we can agree he's likable and very "ordinary" gay man (no make up or provocative clothes or behaviour), but there is so much ignorance and hate in so many comments that they make me sick.

Anonymous said...

Its pretty arrogant to think that being an actor is so important that it justifies living a lie.

The Jake is straight crowd must be a bit lazy over the holiday. Trotting out the Ted made it up he exaggerated tale. Ted has confirmed he does not make up stories and besides Jake was a lot more open when he was on the verge of coming out. Ted uses creative wording for entertainment value but its truth at the core. You will get no converts at this site with that lame argument.

Anonymous said...

As has been said many times on this forum, it's Jake's relentless pimping of "I'm straight and love my blond, blue-eyed bimbos so much," that makes people gag and cringe.

^^ well turn the page and close the book I say. OR

You don't like what the store is selling or the workers in the store, don't go in and buy anything. It's simple.

No need bitchin about someone you think is gay and bearding. How does this help you? Until he admits he's gay, bi or whatever, it's a mute issue. Unless you have pictures of he and some man is compromising situations, if you know what I mean.
Complaining about his life does not help gay causes because YOU have no FACTS to your Assumptions.

Concentrating on Openly gay actors and their cause is the best thing. Unless you're gonna OUT Jake with those pictures, or sit on him until he surrenders and says he's gay.
Otherwisw it's a losing cause, ya know, bitchin about his life and all.
What's it's gonna be?

Anonymous said...

No need bitchin about someone you think is gay and bearding. How does this help you? Until he admits he's gay, bi or whatever, it's a mute issue.

People are free to speculate and voice their opinions (like you have).

Why don't you stop bitchin' about the posters you don't like. They don't give a shit what you think anyway, and you post the same crap day after day. GiggleBabble is over there ----------->>>

Anonymous said...

you post the same crap day after day.

and YOU Don't?
Now that's the pot calling the kettle black!

People are free to speculate and voice their opinions (like you have).

Yes WE Do! That's why I posted my comment.
Hey, but some comments are not speculation. Do you know this?

I just posted my comment because some here are very upset since Jake has not "COME OUT" or Admitted to be Gay, this is what some here want, right, so I thought my point could help some look at it as the cup half full analogy, that's all.
No need to be hostile.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

You don't like what the store is selling or the workers in the store, don't go in and buy anything. It's simple.

Are you for real? You don't like what people say here, yet you hang around like flies on sh!t. To boot, saying everyone is "bitchin" when that what you are doing. LOL!!

destiny said...

Great posts 4:27 and 4:47.

No, there are not any out leading A-list men on tv. But it will happen, and the people I mentioned are helping pave the way.

Back in Chamberlain's day no one was out, and to talk like nothing has changed and to talk as if no one should be out or try to change things is wrong.

destiny said...

Still think Bomer being papped for pr friendly JJ with his kids means he is inching out of the glass closet. And he is a leading man, and not of the comedic variety.

Anonymous said...

I just posted my comment because some here are very upset since Jake has not "COME OUT" or Admitted to be Gay, this is what some here want, right, so I thought my point could help some look at it as the cup half full analogy, that's all. No need to be hostile.

Sorry, you aren't fooling anyone.

You are here to trash and complain about people who dare to have opinions different from yours, to tell us that people who believe Jake is gay should be quiet.

Anonymous said...

Even Johnny Depp insinuated that jack Sprat was gay. How much money did that movie make? The actor that played Gandalf was openly Gay. How much money did those movies make. How much worse would LAOD have done if JG was openly Gay and not in the closet?

Anonymous said...

How much worse would LAOD have done if JG was openly Gay and not in the closet?

No one can answer that question.

Jake's PR said...

Jake said...
Mr Chamberlain is right, but 69 is a bit too early for coming out!


We believe 75-80 is the right age for coming out!

Kevin Spacey said...

Not before 85!

Anonymous said...

Ted has confirmed he does not make up stories

If Ted said that, then it must be true.

Anonymous said...

Still think Bomer being papped for pr friendly JJ with his kids means he is inching out of the glass closet. And he is a leading man, and not of the comedic variety.

No one outside of movie and tv obsessed America knows Bomer (i only know him because you guys post stories about him). The general public outside of the US doesn't even know about WFT favourites JGL or Franco, most don't even know who Jake is either.

It's Clooney, Pitt, Depp, Smith, Damon, DiCaprio etc. who are the big stars. And if one of them came out as gay, that'd be huge.

No one knows and cares about a Bomer. LOL.

JGL, Franco and Jake said...

The general public outside of the US doesn't even know about WFT favourites JGL or Franco, most don't even know who Jake is either.

WTF, you must be joking!

Mickey Rourke Confirms He'll Play Rugby Icon Gareth Thomas, Who Happens to Be Gay said...

In July I mentioned that Mickey Rourke had met with gay rugby legend Gareth Thomas in hopes of playing the athlete in a biopic. Rourke discussed it on Alan Carr's UK talk show Chatty Man last night.

Carr: Is it true you’re about to play a gay rugby player?

Rourke: You’re not supposed to say that, okay? Here’s the deal. When I met the rugby player, Gareth Thomas, this is one thing that he and I talked about. This is something that’s really important. We’re doing a movie about a man who plays rugby who is gay.

Carr: Oh, I see. Sorry, I shouldn’t be so homophobic.

Rourke: That’s the point though.

Carr: Labels.

Rourke: Abso-fucking-lutely. I read the story. it’s one of the tougest, hardest sports in the world to play. They play with no pads. They play… it’s a really brutal sport. To be a man who plays rugby who is gay and to live with that secret for the amount of years that Gareth had, to perform at the high level that he performed at, it takes a lot of courage.

Carr: Are you going to learn the Welsh?

Rourke: I have no choice.

http://www.towleroad.com/2010/12/mickey-rourke-confirms-hell-play-rugby-icon-gareth-thomas-who-happens-to-be-gay.html

Anonymous said...

WTF, you must be joking!

Only silly fag hags on this blog give a shit about those two-bit actors

Anonymous said...

9:25 AM - JGL, Franco and Jake are gay? :)

Anonymous said...

They are straight :)

Anonymous said...

Not in this Universe! :)

Anonymous said...

Maybe over the rainbow? :)

Anonymous said...

More likely in some parallel fangirl Universe :)

destiny said...

Of course there are mmuch bigger stars, the point is that things are changing. But I guess some want any excuse for Jake's behavior.

For example, there was some sitcom actor, can't remember his name, who did voice work for animated movies, who came out in past few years who said he didn't while working because he thought no one would hire him for voice work for family movies.

Now we have NPH starring in the Smurfs movie.

And if someone like a Clooney came out I really doubt that he'd never work again, especially since he has a hand in making some of his movies.

Anonymous said...

Carr: Are you going to learn the Welsh?

Yay - Mickey Rourke is a great actor and I'm sure he'll do a really great job with this.

Anonymous said...

Of course there are mmuch bigger stars, the point is that things are changing.

Things are changing, no question about that, but we are still waiting for someone "big" to come out, someone brave enough to piss off people who support Hollywood rules for gays.

JustJared said...

beard alert

Anonymous said...

"Taylor Swift boards her private jet and catches a departing flight out of Turks and Caicos during Christmas Eve on Friday (December 24)."

Posted on Mon, 27 December 2010 at 10:20 am?

Anonymous said...

"Taylor enjoyed the warm weather with her mom Andrea and younger brother Austin."

LOL!

Anonymous said...

Hmmm. JJ says she left the Islands of Turks and Caicos on Christmas Eve after spending 2 days there with her family. That means they spent the time there Wednesday and Thursday and returned on Friday via her private jet.

Jake was spotted in NY last week up until Friday, I don't remember seeing tweets or FB sightings of him on Christmas Eve or Christmas day unless I missed them. The sightings of him in Brooklyn and visiting the kids at the hospital were Wednesday, Thursday and the sighting in Park slope yesterday.

How much you want to bet that US is doing a story how she spent Xmas with her family on wednesday and thursday and friday and saturday with Jake. Unless there are sightings of him solo in NY on Friday and saturday in NY and her in Nashville those days that I missed.

Why else would there be shots of her boarding her private jet with her family.

Anonymous said...

Unless there are sightings of him solo in NY on Friday and saturday in NY...

Why would that change anything? People who believe tabloid fiction don't care about small details called facts.

Anonymous said...

Franco uses his cool grandma to promote his movie :)

Watch: James Franco Sics His Grandma on Folks Avoiding '127 Hours'

Congratulations Nat! said...

Natalie Portman and choreographer Benjamin Millepied are engaged and expecting their first child, her reps confirm to PEOPLE exclusively.

Atticus said...

Franco uses his cool grandma to promote his movie

I'll promote any movie for food!

Anonymous said...

Natalie Portman and choreographer Benjamin Millepied are engaged and expecting their first child

WOW :)

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Natalie met her ballet dancing baby daddy in spe during Black Swan shooting when he prepared her for her dancing scenes. They have been dating for less than a year. He left his then girlfriend for Natalie.

Congratulations to Natalie on her engagement and pregnancy.

Anonymous said...

Troll, you are stupid and disgusting.

Anonymous said...

Natalie Portman and choreographer Benjamin Millepied are engaged and expecting their first child

Nice surprise, good luck Natalie :)

Anonymous said...

babblers said...
Oh no!


Nah. There are not as many Natalie & Jake shippers as there are Anne & Jake shippers. But there are rumors that Anne is planning on moving in with her boyfriend Adam Shulman. Furthermore she revealed wanting to become a mom pretty soon. That leaves only Michelle... until she hooks up with Gosling or someone else, that is. The straight shipping circle is getting smaller...

Anonymous said...

Anne, don't do it.

Anonymous said...

Probably sooner than later we'll see if she'll do it.

Anonymous said...

Gosling is bearding with Blake Lively

Anonymous said...

There are pictures or just made up stories?

Anonymous said...

Gossip - Blue Valentine and Blake Lively's career are produced by Harvey Weinstein.

Anonymous said...

Ted has confirmed he does not make up stories

^^ this is laughable ^^

I think the "Don't Play Stupid" Jake hater who don't know s/he's a Troll posted this insanity.

Anonymous said...

Watch: James Franco Sics His Grandma on Folks Avoiding '127 Hours'

Bunch of pussies!? lol

OT said...

With a role in Darren Aronofsky's Black Swan and a girlfriend named Natalie Portman, the renowned ballet dancer and choreographer is about to leap into the upper echelon of celebrity.

Benjamin Millepied: Lord of the Dance

Anonymous said...

"You don't like what the store is selling or the workers in the store, don't go in and buy anything. It's simple." Ugh, judging by the US box office for POP and the mediocre returns for LOAD, looks like most people are staying out of the store. Jake does not need your help to keep any others out. He tossed out his old fan base but has been unable to nurture a replacement one since. 20 babblers do not a box office make. And POP is appearing in critics worst films of 2010 lists as they get published.

Anonymous said...

And POP is appearing in critics worst films of 2010 lists as they get published.

Ay! PoP wasn't that bad.

Anonymous said...

^^It really wasn't.

Anonymous said...

Jake's problem is that he has had bad luck for the last 5 years with his movies. They were all critical failures. If you take a look at his sister's movies in the last couple of years, it's one critical hit after the other. Is she the better actress of the two? I'd say no. They are both equally solid. She's just more lucky with her projects. Maybe Jake won't be having a critical hit in another 10years? But we can't strangle him for it. In this business it's also about luck. There are many actors who are on Jake's acting level, but are lucky to star in much better movies. C'est la vie!

Anonymous said...

Actually, Jake started having trouble getting good parts when he began exploring the possibility of coming out in 2006. I wonder, sometimes, if he isn't actually still being punished for this violation of the rules. I know many here don't think this, but I happen to be someone who thinks Jake may have decided to start a family in 2007. That's why he went into the closet that same year. At first, I found it hard to believe, but a lot would be explained about the way his career has faltered ever since. Maybe the less than successful career he's had since 2007 has nothing to do with him being lazy or unlucky. He might just be preoccupied with different priorities.

Anonymous said...

OT: Elton John and his partner just had a baby through a surrogate.

Isn't Elton a bit old to become a father?

Anonymous said...

The buzz is that after BBM Jake held out for too much money. Good roles went to others. Do agree though that his priorities have changed since he had Baby Tile. You can see the indifference in his interviews. The enthusiasm is an act now. It used to be natural. Could be his clear schedule in 2011 is intentional.

Sir Elton John said...

Shut up, 10:39 PM!

Anonymous said...

Could be his clear schedule in 2011 is intentional.

Clear to do what?

Anonymous said...

Clear to do what?

To breastfeed BT

Anonymous said...

Awww, that kid from Ukraine stole their hearts :)

"Last year, the couple, who were married in 2005 after 12 years together, tried to adopt an orphan in Ukraine.

However, Ukrainian officials said Sir Elton, 62, was too old and his civil partnership with Mr Furnish, 48, would not be recognised as a marriage by Kiev."

Anonymous said...

who were married
civil partnership


BBC is slipping.

BT said...

Shut up, 4:46 AM!

Anonymous said...

Do agree though that his priorities have changed since he had Baby Tile.

Jake was working and bearding like crazy when BT was born and was a little baby (let's presume there is BT). So how and when Jake's priorities changed?

Anonymous said...

Maybe Jake won't be having a critical hit in another 10years? But we can't strangle him for it. In this business it's also about luck.

I agree that luck is very important in life and business, but I would love to see Jake trying to do something about it. For example, doing a small role in some cool movie, to show that he's serious about his acting and not just his Hollywood status and image.

Anonymous said...

Oscar Nomination Ballots are mailed today.

Anonymous said...

Nat and Franco will be nominated for sure, fingers crossed for Michelle and Ryan, sorry Jake and Anne.

Anonymous said...

Jake was working and bearding like crazy when BT was born and was a little baby (let's presume there is BT). So how and when Jake's priorities changed?

It's not the working (he can take BT with him like I believe he did in South Carolina and during the filming of PoP), it's the lack of enthusiasm and commitment to his career. Because of Reeke, he didn't even have to do public appearances for over 2 years (11/07-12/09). Yet, when the two alledgedly broke up, he's constantly talking about family and having children, which he rarely did before.

I believe the bearding is done to help hide the obvious change in his lifestyle, to distract the public and to keep him relevant and in the news, without having to work too hard. That's why the beards have to be high profile.

With Reeke he came out for his photoshoots about every 14 days, allowing him to not have to be seen out and about town as a single bachelor. Finally, look at him this summer. He was practically a hermit. Out of sight and unconcerned about whether he had projects line up for 2011. Wouldn't be surprised if he was nesting with the family. In the past, he would have been ambitiously vying for available roles or seen out and about town, like any active, healthy bachelor. Now, he's telling us that he isn't even going to be doing the gym anymore and that he's reassessing his career. Maybe writing and directing. Maybe pursuing comedies. Even saying he doesn't consider himself a leading man. All very curious.

Anonymous said...

it's the lack of enthusiasm

i wouldn't be enthusiastic either if i delivered 4 turkeys in the raw in the span of 4 years.

Anonymous said...

Jake is too young to give up and stop trying and pushing.

Anonymous said...

Wouldn't be surprised if he was nesting with the family.

It still doesn't make sense to choose not to spend time with a newborn baby and to nest 3 years later. And who's family since Austin is out of the picture?

Anonymous said...

In the past, he would have been ambitiously vying for available roles or seen out and about town, like any active, healthy bachelor.

He did that 5-6 months ago.

Anonymous said...

i wouldn't be enthusiastic either if i delivered 4 turkeys in the raw in the span of 4 years.

Actually, the last movie Jake was associated with that had no relationship to him settling down with his boyfriend, and raising a family together, was Zodiac. The film was critically acclaimed and made (combined Domestic and International box office) $84 million, with a production budget of $65 million.

The first film that was truly associated with Jake becoming domesticated was the whole Reeke/Rendition project which, in retrospect, seemed to be directly associated with providing Jake cover for his new emerging family plans. In addition, to making the Chin look like she was still desirable.

Yes, I'm a BT believer too. So essentially, before Jake's priorities shifted, his movies were successful. Afterwards, not so much. This may be because his focus is elsewhere and the reason he takes a film is related to factors other than the project itself. Like maybe how long the filmshoot will be, the location and whether or not he will be able to have his privacy needs protected. Who knows, maybe major studios find it risky to bankroll or offer Jake better roles in case "something" comes out about his private situation. Just a thought because I'm tired of reading how the only explanations are related Jake being lazy, unlucky and a famewhore.

Anonymous said...

So essentially, before Jake's priorities shifted, his movies were successful.

What priorities??? Jake was working and bearding, not taking time to raise BT.

Anonymous said...

So essentially, before Jake's priorities shifted...

Sorry, we didn't forget how much time Jake wasted preparing and shooting PoP - his priority was work and bearding.

Anonymous said...

It still doesn't make sense to choose not to spend time with a newborn baby and to nest 3 years later. And who's family since Austin is out of the picture?

I'm not the original poster, but I think Jake and Austin coordinated the taking care of the newborn back in 2007-08. Wouldn't be surprised if BT was with Jake for some of the Brothers or Nailed shoot either. Remember, that whole weird South Carolina controversy, when Jake's attorney immediately pounced on someone for revealing where Jake was staying during the shoot? Later, Jake had a six or seven room place when he was filming Prince of Persia in Morocco. Oh, I think Jake and Austin are actively raising BT.

Anonymous said...

I'm enjoying a different angle on what the heck is going on with Jake's career. Not a BT believer, but some of these comments are interesting. Never thought of the timing of all of this, but Jake has definitely changed since 2007. Hmmmm. I chuckle at whoever immediately pounces when someone floats the idea of Jake being a father. Someone certainly doesn't like the idea at all and I don't think it's because they don't think it's possible (because, of course, it is).

Anonymous said...

Later, Jake had a six or seven room place when he was filming Prince of Persia in Morocco.

Parents want to be with their babies, to take care of them, to bond - having a baby knowing you aren't going to be there for her/him makes no sense.

Anonymous said...

Oh, I think Jake and Austin are actively raising BT.

How? By actively staying away from each other?

Anonymous said...

Maybe Jake won't be having a critical hit in another 10years? But we can't strangle him for it. In this business it's also about luck.
***
I agree that luck is very important in life and business, but I would love to see Jake trying to do something about it. For example, doing a small role in some cool movie, to show that he's serious about his acting and not just his Hollywood status and image.


I understand your part about being serious about acting. How can you say he's not? I beleive Jake and most actors are serious about their craft. Dating other high profile stars are another thing. But it happens and sometimes work.

I guess one of your example is Christian Bale.

None of us are there going thru the scripts, the casting, the producers of these movies. Every producer thinks his movie is a winner or awards, well most. It's after the actors are picked and the movie is finished that determines if it's a hit or miss.
Posters here claiming that Jake's career is over because he is not in some cool or award winning film are living in a fantasy world. It's easy to sit at the computer and complain about something you have no inner workings of or about.

So many great stars don't get mentioned for awards their entire career. Then some get a nod or win (something) in the sunset of their acting careers. And just as Jake, there will be some misses and flopps along the way. It's a crap shoot. I read somewhere Jake passed up the lead part in Avatar. Well the movie was huge and made mega millions. But Sam didn't win any awards and I don't think JaKE Would have either.
All of this movie making stuff has become more of a crap shoot, or the studios buy or lobby for their movies awards.

Clooney has had more flops than hits. Brad Pitt has not won an award. A movie I seen recently "Traitor" was a great movie. Not promoted much and not many saw it. It had an award winning performance by Don Cheadle. No buzz at all. Plenty of movies don't get promoted well. I guess all actors should be looking for that script that can guarantee and award huh? They can, but it don't work.

Anonymous said...

How? By actively staying away from each other?

No-one's buying what you're selling. Of course they are never seen together, just the way they like it (because they are actually together, raising the BT's)

Anonymous said...

^^ another thing. Why are so many famous award winning stars are now doing Television??? Are there no award winning roles for them in film? Can they get work now.
Does their previous awards not guarantee more sucessful movies or better roles, work?
Or is this conversation relegated to young beautiful/handsome stars to win the awards.

Anonymous said...

Prince of Persia is ending up on a lot of critics' worst films of 2010 list.

Anonymous said...

No-one's buying what you're selling. Of course they are never seen together, just the way they like it (because they are actually together, raising the BT's)

I didn't post the comment you are speaking to, but, No-one's buying your hopes and dreams about Jake and Austin raising a baby. Sorry.
You might have to relinquish this dream.
It's Old and has no legs. = Fantasy

Anonymous said...

10:19am - No need bitchin about someone you think is gay and bearding. How does this help you?

Anonymous said...

I think the "You don't like what the store is selling" Jake hater who don't know s/he's a Troll posted this insanity @10:29am.

Anonymous said...

Once again, no one has any idea how much time Jake and Austin spend together. Where was Austin, for example, in 2007-2008 and 2009? It really was only after Jake's showmance with Witherspoon collapsed did it become important to manipulate Austin's whereabouts too. No doubt, Jake's beardless status, was one of the reasons why Austin got a formal beard in 2009. As well as a Twitter and Facebook account in 2010. That's also why Sophia Bush lied about her and Austin being together for 5 1/2 years. They know if people look closely, they'll see how she suspiciously entered the picture in 2009.

It's been said before, but not many people even recognize Austin or know who he is, and Jake lets us "see" his comings and goings as he sees fit. Like when he wants to be papped at LAX. Yet, suddenly, turns up somewhere and no one has any idea how he arrived. Swift does the same thing. It's called having a lot of resources at your disposal, like private planes, and controlling your image. Most of the celebrity sites and publications are nothing more than tools of CAA, WMA et al. anyway. Everyone plays the game and "cooperates" with one another.

Anonymous said...

How? By actively staying away from each other?
No-one's buying what you're selling.


No one is selling anything and you are wrong - we KNOW that Jake and Austin don't care about being together and we know they are in different cities most of the time.

Anonymous said...

Once again, no one has any idea how much time Jake and Austin spend together.

Please. No one in the right mind can claim that thousands tweets and photos and sightings are faked just to make us believe that Jake and Austin aren't together.

Anonymous said...

you are wrong - we KNOW that Jake and Austin don't care about being together

How do you KNOW? That's a pretty out there statement, which I'm sure you won't provide any evidence for.

Did Jake ring you last night? NO.
Perhaps Austin sent you an encrypted twitter? THOUGHT NOT.

Anonymous said...

Poor Jaustiloons, soon the OMG sock puppets will be over here joining in with the choir (of two). LOL!!

Anonymous said...

10:30, it don't help me.

Not bithchin

I believe he likes guys and girls..

guys on the side occassionally. OK

Since I think he like girls and guys and maybe get married one day, maybe soon, I think their is a chance he's not bearding. or Maybe he is for this fling.

Anonymous said...

I understand your part about being serious about acting. How can you say he's not?

Because there is no reason to believe Jake is ambitious about acting or his craft, working to improve or expand his skills. He acts in movies and that's it - he's not walking an extra mile.

Anonymous said...

No one in the right mind can claim that thousands tweets and photos and sightings

LOL! Talk about hyperbole. Usually, exaggeration is the first sign of desperation. Sure Jake and Austin can be together. Quite possible. And, raise a family on the downlow too.

10:35am #2 I noticed that no one responded to your observation about where was Austin in 2007-09. Or, how he "suspiciously" showed up with a formal beard in 2010, just after Jake became beardless...so to speak.

Coincidence? I think not.

Anonymous said...

How do you KNOW? That's a pretty out there statement, which I'm sure you won't provide any evidence for.

We discussed that many times, just one PROOF this time: Jake leaving LA and Austin few weeks before Austin starts months of OTH filming.

Anonymous said...

Talk about hyperbole. Usually, exaggeration is the first sign of desperation.

Playing stupid doesn't help.
Check WFT2 comments since April to see how Austin and Jake spent 95% of their time in different cities - we discussed every opportunity for them to be together.

Anonymous said...

I believe he likes guys and girls..

guys on the side occassionally. OK



Then why does Jake beard? If he liked mostly girls he would certainly be married by now. He's domestically inclined, enjoys cooking and gardening, likes the quiet life, and LOVES children. He's thirty years old. There should be no problem for him to have found the right woman by now. Look at his buddy, Natalie Portman. She shares none of Jake's domesticated inclinations, yet at 29 she's suddenly pregnant and has a man in a life...engaged. It's called biology and the normal progression of things.

Anonymous said...

We discussed that many times, just one PROOF this time: Jake leaving LA and Austin few weeks before Austin starts months of OTH filming.

GAWD! Hope you are never on the jury in the case of someone wrongly accused of a capital crime

Anonymous said...

Playing stupid doesn't help.
Check WFT2 comments since April to see how Austin and Jake spent 95% of their time in different cities - we discussed every opportunity for them to be together.


Now, who's playing stupid. You give yourself far too much credit if you think you have truly "seen" every opportunity for Jake and Austin to be together. Remember, Leadville? We weren't suppose to see that one either. Or, when Austin was supposed to leave LA after his Surfrider event, but suddenly something happened to his flight. Jake was in LA that weekend too.

Anonymous said...

guys on the side occassionally. OK

You just cannot stand to say those three letters G A Y.

Men who have "guys on the side" do so because they are closeted. If they were out, they would have guys on the side ALL the time ie they are G A Y.

Anonymous said...

GAWD! Hope you are never on the jury in the case of someone wrongly accused of a capital crime

What is that supposed to mean?

Anonymous said...

Jake's family is in NY/PA, the only family left in L.a. is his crazy father. He has no reason to go or stay their except for professional reasons, I bet he sublets his place in L.A., he's never there.

People leave him alone in Brooklyn and even in Manhattan lately and no one ver says anything about him visiting family in PA which he has been for years.

I think Jake is bored with acting and is just in it for the $$$$.

PS: There was a thread on ONTD when they posted the US story about Jake and Taylor. Someone claimed that a few weeks bedore Jake and Taylor were spotted in Brooklyn in October , they saw Jake with 3 girls at some restauraunt in Park Slope. They said that they all appeared drunk and that Jake was hitting on one of the girls real hard and that he farted. Don't know if it's true or not, it sounded a bit like the incident in Montreal with a drunk Jake and aome girls, dancing and him supposedly shoving DSF's GF into a table.

Anonymous said...

The "Stop playing stupid" troll is almost as clueless as the "You don't like what the store is selling" troll. LOL!!

Anonymous said...

It looks like the 2 jaustaloons from OMG are snowed in!

They know there is no BT and Jake is in Ny and Austin is in L.A. with Sophia and her family.

Anonymous said...

Remember, Leadville?
Yes, that wasn't Austin.

Or, when Austin was supposed to leave LA after his Surfrider event, but suddenly something happened to his flight. Jake was in LA that weekend too.
So? Parents with small kids make effort to be together. Yes, they are in the same city from time to time, but spending time apart when they can be together is very telling.

Anonymous said...

11:01, you just describe someone on the DL, downlow, in the closet bisexual. It happens. You can use that same analogy to describe the idea of Jake and Austin still being together, although I don't think they are and have not been for some time now, YEARS.

Yes, I beieve Jake is sexually attracted to both sexes, therefore he won't speak on it and will be seen with women only in public as his girlfriend, and will have sex with opposite sex. (A girl) lol Classic case of men who are into both sexes. Do I know for sure, hell no and you don't either. You believe he's gay, I don't. These types of things happen more than you or most believe. Do the research.

Anonymous said...

You just cannot stand to say those three letters G A Y.

it is apparent that men can only be gay or bi to you.

What does the B in LGBT mean to YOU? Is it for women only?

There are women and MEN who are interested in both sexes.

But your need to label men is your need only and every sexual situation is not the same for everyoe.

Yes, I can stand to say the word GAY. I will say it, GAY.
BUT, we know you can't stand to say the word bisexual.
I know what gay mean, and I know what bisexual means also.
I think you have your own meaning of the word.

Anonymous said...

Classic case of men who are into both sexes.

No, that is not bisexuality, that is your excuse for Jake's bearding.

Anonymous said...

Jake also spends time with Michele and Matilda in Brooklyn too:


People tend to box her into a vulnerable corner, but what's lurking underneath is severe strength and a sense of humor," says her pal Jake Gyllenhaal. "There's a tendency in our business to emphasize the business or get caught up in hype. Michelle has never, ever done that. She genuinely prefers her life over her work, and as a result her work is better than almost any other actor out there."


http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2010-12-28-MichelleWilliams_CV_N.htm

Anonymous said...

Do I know for sure, hell no and you don't either. You believe he's gay, I don't.

I think a lot of people at one stage thought he was bi, but two years of Reeke bearding, and now Swyll bearding are pretty damning indicators that he is not bi.

Anonymous said...

You just cannot stand to say those three letters G A Y.

it is apparent that men can only be gay or bi to you.

What does the B in LGBT mean to YOU? Is it for women only?

There are women and MEN who are interested in both sexes.

But your need to label men is your need only and every sexual situation is not the same for everyoe.

Yes, I can stand to say the word GAY. I will say it, GAY.
BUT, we know you can't stand to say the word bisexual.
I know what gay mean, and I know what bisexual means also.
I think you have your own meaning of the word.

Anonymous said...

Correction:

it is apparent that men can only be gay or "STRAIGHT" to you.

Anonymous said...

You can't stand the idea that men can be bisexual just as women can you?

Answer the question.

Anonymous said...

But your need to label men is your need only and every sexual situation is not the same for everyoe.

Please cut that bullshit.
Gay, bisexual, straight ... are words we need in order to communicate. Those words have the same meaning for all who care about the subject and aren't to lazy to look them up.

Anonymous said...

You can't stand the idea that men can be bisexual just as women can you?

Why would we care one way or another? We can't change anyone's sexuality.

Anonymous said...

Oh please. I'm referring to Jake, not "all men". You Said in relation to Jake: "guys on the side occassionally. OK".

What if it is more than occasional. It justs sounds like you want to downplay the "gay" thing, like it's a side dish to the main meal! Any woman he has been linked to in the past four years is a proven beard ie cover for a closeted gay man.

Anonymous said...

I think you have your own meaning of the word.

Jake doesn't date women. He is gay. We have no need for another meaning of the word 'bisexual'.

Anonymous said...

one here who knows DL men personally. i feel some can be considered Gay. most are bi and like both sexes. they won't leave females, wife or girlfriend. that is first and foremost. they are secret about who they are. most average person think the men are str8. they Hide their interest in both sexes from the public.
-in the closet-

Anonymous said...

11;37, nobody's down playing the word gay or anything. Just to make mention of other things some and maybe you are not aware of.

It sounds like you are trying to downplay the bisexual thing. Are you?

The B in LGBT does have a meaning, does it not? For openly gay men, the PC thing to do is call every man gay or straight. Nothing else. it's PC, but to some, it's not correct and it's biased.

Anonymous said...

For openly gay men, the PC thing to do is call every man gay or straight.

HUH???

Anonymous said...

to label men straight or either gay. nothing else.

Anonymous said...

Of course there are bi men. Who's arguing with you. You think Jake is bi. I don't. End of story.

Anonymous said...

11:01, you just describe someone on the DL, downlow, in the closet bisexual. It happens. You can use that same analogy to describe the idea of Jake and Austin still being together, although I don't think they are and have not been for some time now, YEARS.

Then why was Austin in Leadville, at the end of August 2010, with Jake. Or, was he there to do Peter? LOL!

Anonymous said...

Gay men know other gay and bisexual men, so I believe DL and other gay forum posters who claim that bisexual men are very rare.

Anonymous said...

It needs to be said again. Bisexual men don't need to beard. Particularly, someone like Jake whose career would, no doubt, benefit from a high profile love match. He's obviously in the closet because he's GAY!

Anonymous said...

Of course, Jake's bearding. I mean give me a break. Ice cream lickin'? Apple pickin? The non-Macy's Thanksgiving Parade of Gyllenhaals all lined up to pimp the fake relationship to the world. C'mon.

An immaculate conception relationship, *POOF* out of nowhere?

Anonymous said...

12:01 that same example can be used for a bisexaul man who won't admit it to the public, as most won't, and continue to have affairs with women or married.

Now you can say "he's bearding"
all you want, but (lol) how do you know. Have you been on dates with them? Are you under Jake's bed? I know the Taylor thing looks wierd, but who knows? Again, what he is doing, in the closet bi men do.

Anonymous said...

You can't say "POOF", you have to say "SWOOSH-BISEXUAL"!

Anonymous said...

Now I do believe Jake is bi, I just do. But some of my friends also said "he's dating who, oh he has to be gay now, I'm know it".
They are not a fan and don't care about his sex preference one way or the other. I found their comments halarious.

Anonymous said...

Now you can say "he's bearding" all you want, but (lol) how do you know.

Posing for paparazzi and made up tabloid fiction. We have seen it all before. 100% fake.

Anonymous said...

Now you can say "he's bearding" all you want, but (lol) how do you know.

Just like we knew Ricky was bearding with Rebecca de Alba.

British tabloids said...

"Jake shows Taylor his 'hood
The hunky actor takes his girlfriend to his fave hotspots"
Now Magazine scan

Anonymous said...

... with Rebecca de Alba and few other (celebrity) beards.

Anonymous said...

The hunky actor takes his girlfriend to his fave hotspots

That jacket Jake has makes him look so bisexual!

Anonymous said...

"Jake shows Taylor his 'hood

LMAO!!!
LA, NYC... it's all the same! They didn't bother to read US tabloid fiction :)
The best bit - Jake trusted Swift not to steal from his house! LOL

Anonymous said...

Taylor shows Jake her fave leaves on the ground, and then drags Maggie and Ramona to the exact same spot

PR said...

Miss Taylor has no time to waste!

trailer said...

The Other Woman: Natalie Portman Is a Homewrecker

Anonymous said...

Also, bisexual men don't have to have sisters, go-betweens, or female actress friends hook them up with their "girlfriends". To this day, PR is still confused how Jake "met" Swift. Notice also how Jake was associated with Rachel Bilson as late as September of this year. Apparently, the negotiations with Taylor hadn't been finalzed yet. If, you think about it, the only regular kind of hook-up Jake has experienced was with Austin. He met him on the set of The Day After Tomorrow. And, they worked out a relationship after that.

Jake wanted to come out as bisexual in 2006 because it's more acceptable and he wanted to have cover for the two years of bearding with Kirsten. Sure he probably had sex with her (gay men do have sex with women), but that doesn't make him bi.

The weirdest hookups of the year go to: said...

Taylor Swift and Jake Gyllenhaal.

Yes, it’s true – his ex Reese Witherspoon reportedly set them up. They started dating and spent Thanksgiving together. Taylor is way younger than he is… she just turned 21! There is something about this relationship is just plain creepy, don’t you think?

Anonymous said...

1:08 you forgot to mention that Bilson is a known beard and went back to Christensen right after the attempt to couple her with Jake. Don't neglect to mention Olivia Munn and Isabel Lucas too. All these women's names associated with Jake, and then we inevitably find out later that they had no intimate relationship at all. For example, there was finally an official comment from Lucas in early June (after the release of PoP) and she admitted their relationship was purely Platonic. How convenient to finally get her to go on record after two months of a cat and mouse game making it seem that they were a couple.

Anonymous said...

Oh, that's right. I forgot that one of the tabloid stories was that Jake's ex-girlfriend felt sorry for him so Reese was actually the one who hooked him up with Swift. LOL!

Anonymous said...

Don't neglect to mention Olivia Munn

I thought it funny that Olivia denied a hook-up with Jake but a day or two later Ted had a long item about them, never realizing she had already put the kibosh on that notion.

Anonymous said...

Olivia denied hooking up with Foxx, not Jake.

Anonymous said...

Something is up in Jake/Taylor showmance. They haven't been linked together since the few days she spent in LA with the calling the cops incident. She went home for her birthday and Jake was in NYC for his birthday. The JJ post on Swift the other day was inaccurate. JJ said she spent 2 days away, but a commentor said she had been their a week. In fact she was seen shopping with her mom on 12/19 and there are pics. After the big debut that they had between Thanksgiving and the the Nashville weekend, it's odd that they had been together since. I think it's especially strange that there were no photo ops for either one of their birthdays and for the holidays. Afterall they are so into each other and their families and friends are so happy about them being together. Maybe PR is planning the big New Year's weekend romantic getaway that the paps just happened to be hanging around and got pics.

rags said...

Tomorrow we'll see if PR worked on Christmas fiction or not.

Anonymous said...

People tend to box her into a vulnerable corner, but what's lurking underneath is severe strength and a sense of humor," says her pal Jake Gyllenhaal. "There's a tendency in our business to emphasize the business or get caught up in hype. Michelle has never, ever done that. She genuinely prefers her life over her work, and as a result her work is better than almost any other actor out there."

What great words form Jake. He always seemed to be an admirer of Michelle. :)

Anonymous said...

Before posters begin to verbally beat the shit out of me, let me get some things straight. Even if I believed Jake was bi/straight I'd never want him to hook up with a fellow celeb, an unknown woman would be the best choice. Someone who will not overshadow his career.
The following is not me being a latent shipper, but someone who thought about certain things concerning Jake and Michelle.

So, even though I don't think Jake was dating Michelle 12 years ago, I do think they knew each other and hung out for a while before BBM. The guy at "meet the famous" who saw Jake picking up Michelle after her play regularly refered to Michelle as Jake's gf, but it's just assumption on his part, they probably just hung out. Jake's godmother, JLC, who did "Halloween" with Michelle probably introduced them. Jake was in the 2nd year of college and Michelle was on a break from DC and did the play "Killer Joe" in NYC. That said, I think Jake knew Michelle longer than Heath up until Brokeback. And even though I believe Jake and Heath became friends during BBM, I think his friendship with Michelle intensified. And I think she had a say who the godfather of her child should be. I wouldn't be surprised if she decided altogther and went for Busy and Jake and Heath agreed. And she and Heath were probably like... "you decide this time, I'll do it the next". Just a thought. I have no doubt we'll find out anyway in the near future, but I wouldn't be surprised if my theory was correct.

Anonymous said...

blah,blah,blah... Michelle is bland, she has the same facial expression in each movie she makes.
She is a great permormer on her public persona,though. Not overexposed and very subtle. Jake is kissing her ass because at this moment it suits HIM, as he always does with his colleagues.

Anonymous said...

Reese’s movie is doing so poorly that it isn’t even ranked on boxofficemojo. It is below LAOD.

I think he is bi.

I think he wasn’t ready for someone who was into a big showmance like Taylor. Whatever there relationship was/is, I think that the Thanksgiving pictures of his niece was too much for him. I think he backed out. Yes, he may have said yes to having it happen, but I think it crossed a line. This is HIS family, unlike when Reese used her kids.

Anonymous said...

Even if I believed Jake was bi/straight I'd never want him to hook up with a fellow celeb, an unknown woman would be the best choice.

Not in this era of tabloid journalism. An unknown woman or man would be the worst choice. When you become a celebrity you more or less know what comes with the territory. Thrusting that onto a "commoner" would be cruel. Would you want tabs dredging up your past in an effort to know all about Jake's new love?

Anonymous said...

Would you want tabs dredging up your past in an effort to know all about Jake's new love?

Depends if "I" have dark secrets or not. I guess it is a risk if someone has somthing to hide.
I think Depp hooking up with a b list actress, Vanessa Paradise, was a smart choice. She does her little thing and never overshadowed his career and never will.

Anonymous said...

Sharing a great Ricky Martin interview (British gay magazine Attitude):

‘Ricky Martin is a new type of gay star – a single dad who is stable, spiritual and oh yes, sexy’

page 1, page 2, page 3, page 4, pics

Anonymous said...

Thanks 4:44 PM :)

Us Weekly said...

The Chin is engaged.

"Reese Witherspoon is ready to walk down the aisle again!
She and Hollywood agent Jim Toth are engaged, her rep confirms exclusively to UsMagazine.com. "They are extremely happy," the rep tells Us..."

http://www.usmagazine.com/healthylifestyle/news/reese-witherspoon-jim-toth-engaged-20102812

Anonymous said...

^^I'm pretty certain Reese's marriage with Toth won't last for too long.

box office said...

How Do You Know

Domestic Total as of Dec. 26, 2010: $15 million
Production Budget: $120 million
Marketing Budget: unknown

Anonymous said...

Why would Jake be upset with the photo op and his niece? He had to know ahead of time and signed of on it.

I think they are playing "coy" this time around, the Thanksgiving pics were too much after a monthe of dating.

The pre-Christmas holiday can be spun, she returned Christmas Eve, who knows where she went and there were no sightings of Jake on Christmas day or Eve.

Anonymous said...

Why would Jake be upset with the photo op and his niece? He had to know ahead of time and signed of on it.

DUH!!!

Jake said...

Ricky Martin is a new type of gay star – a single dad who is stable, spiritual and oh yes, sexy

Anyone has Ricky's number?

Michael k said...

talking about Reese's engagement:

Meanwhile, Taylor Swift got on one knee and slipped a red candy ring on Jakey's finger while they played Cinderella in her playroom. Of course Jakey was Cinderella, because Taylor can't do the "innocent maiden eye flutter" as good as he can.

D-listed

Anonymous said...

Jake is kissing her ass because at this moment it suits HIM, as he always does with his colleagues.

Michelle is Jake's friend, not just colleague.

Anonymous said...

I have no doubt we'll find out anyway in the near future, but I wouldn't be surprised if my theory was correct.

There is no reason for Jake or Michelle to hide something like that + if that really happened I'm sure we would found out during Brokeback time.

Anonymous said...

There is no reason for Jake or Michelle to hide something like that

Hide? Why hide? I doubt anyone cared if Jake and Michelle did hang out briefly five years prior to making BBM. Everyone was interested in Jake and Heath.

Anonymous said...

Heath and Kiki supposedly had a short fling before he hooked up with Watts. No one cared about that either.

Anonymous said...

Use Google and you'll find info about Dunst and Heath. There is nothing about Jake and Michelle because they never met before BBMt.

Anonymous said...

6:50 PM - But Jake attended her play, there's a photo of him with a fan. Of course it's possible that the photo wasn't taken after the play like this guy claims, rather at a whole different place. Question remains why would this guy lie?

Oh well, the whole thing isn't that relevant.

Anonymous said...

I agree Michelle was probably the one with the idea to ask Jake to be the godfather. Why would Heath want Jake with as many friends as he had? Jake and Heath didn't even look close during BBM.

Anonymous said...

Question remains why would this guy lie?

No, the question is why would anyone believe some guy who loves taking pictures of celebrities and posting them on the Internet.
We have a picture of Jake and that is all - no reason to believe that Jake met Michelle.

Anonymous said...

Hide? Why hide? I doubt anyone cared if Jake and Michelle did hang out briefly five years prior to making BBM.

Hide because Jake talked about meeting Heath before BBMt so we have to presume that he decided not to mention Michelle if they really met before BBMt (don't believe that happened).

Anonymous said...

Hide because Jake talked about meeting Heath before BBMt

Because he was asked numerous times if he knew Heath before BBM, no interviewer ever asked him if he knew Michelle before.

Anonymous said...

Nat and Franco will be nominated for sure, fingers crossed for Michelle and Ryan, sorry Jake and Anne.

When will the Oscar nominations be announced? I'm confident about Michelle getting the last slot, not so sure about Ryan.

Anonymous said...

Because he was asked numerous times if he knew Heath before BBM, no interviewer ever asked him if he knew Michelle before.

Please.
Jake, Heath and Michelle talked about the movie and BBMt colleagues 10.000.000 times but somehow they all forgot to mention their previous friendship. Give me a break.

«Oldest ‹Older   601 – 800 of 1544   Newer› Newest»