Montgomery Clift rolling cigarette
during shooting of 'Red River', circa 1948
during shooting of 'Red River', circa 1948
The Advocate: There are so many biographies of Montgomery Clift and numerous websites devoted to him. What was the biggest surprise you learned about him while researching your book?
Amy Lawrence: I was most impressed by Clift’s canny understanding of his own image. Many biographers depict him as refusing to participate in the Hollywood star system, but that didn’t mean he was ignorant of it. He understood how an actor’s image was built and maintained. In giving interviews or choosing roles, he knew exactly how to shape a performance to achieve the effect he wanted — and to resist the efforts of others to simplify a character. For instance, he was aware that screenwriters and directors often wanted to make the hero perfect; Clift wanted to make the character human, complicated, and not always admirable.
Q: Clift is often spoken of in context as a “gay actor” or in conjunction with Marlon Brando and James Dean. What do you see as Clift’s singular legacy?
A: Brando and Dean both thought of Clift as singular. Brando saw Clift as his only major competition, and Dean saw him as a model, an ideal to emulate. Unlike those performers, Clift’s best work has not become dated. In Red River, From Here to Eternity, A Place in the Sun, I Confess, and half a dozen others, his performances are impeccable. At his best he is never mannered or predictable. His performances are subtle, intelligent, graceful, and deeply empathetic regardless of the character’s flaws.
Q: How did Clift’s being gay — or bisexual, as some suggest — when it was still taboo affect his drinking, drug taking, and ultimate downward spiral?
A: The homophobia of the time, which intensified nationally just as Clift’s career was beginning in the late 1940s and early ’50s, certainly exerted pressure on Clift. A serious relationship with choreographer Jerome Robbins in the ’40s threatened both their careers when Robbins was blackmailed into testifying before the House Un-American Activities Committee hearings regarding communists and other “subversives” in Washington and the entertainment community. I would be hesitant, though, to cast Clift as a “sad young man,” “self-loathing homosexual,” or fit him into any other category into which gay men were sorted from the 1950s to ’70s. Alcoholism affects everyone, and in the postwar period heavy drinking was routine across the board. By the time Clift’s drinking became full-blown alcoholism, it was impossible to disentangle from his devastating car accident, the prescription painkillers he needed at the time, and his professional fear regarding the damage done to his face. In the latter part of his career, his drinking and drug taking were so dominant in his life that he couldn’t function without them. Paradoxically, at the point when he worked with unsupportive or openly hostile homophobic producers and directors, the drugs and drinking sustained him as much as they destroyed him.
Q: You write about the fan magazines of the 1950s that frequently used sexually suggestive headlines such as “Who Is Monty Kidding?” How well known was the truth about Clift’s sexuality during that era?
A: Clift worked in a period when fan magazines were challenged by scandal magazines, each promising “the truth” about stars’ private lives. Ironically, even the scandal rags did not want any “truth” firmly established because that would rob them of the chance to repeatedly tantalize readers with the next promised exposé. Biographical information suggests that people who worked with Clift always “knew” in exact proportion to what they wanted to know. Fans likewise. Everyone minimized the complexity of Clift’s emotional relationships — with men, older women, young women — in order to maintain the image of the actor that appealed to them most.
Q: A recent article in Newsweek suggests audiences can’t accept gay actors as romantic leading men when we know the truth about their real-life sexuality and uses Rock Hudson as an example. How do you think this applies to Clift, who had such intense chemistry on-screen with Elizabeth Taylor and other actresses?
A: When audiences think they know something about an actor’s personal sexuality it becomes available as a touchstone to spectators watching a performance but is never mandatory. People judging a performance often appreciate it most the more it varies from what we think we know about the performer — casting against type, nice people playing psychos, beautiful actresses playing ugly. If we think of Clift as an actor, then his persuasiveness as a romantic lead opposite Taylor, Olivia de Havilland, or Jennifer Jones increases our appreciation of his skill as he seems to become inseparable from the role.
Another issue is history itself. As new generations are introduced to Clift and Hudson, they often react to the performers without knowing any biographical information about them. They are also less invested in “the truth” than those who experienced a change in their perception through revelations and the exposure of secrets. The freer sexuality of Brando or Dean, for instance, has not come to dominate their images.
Q: How do you think Clift would have fared personally and professionally if he began his career today, with the intrusion of the Internet and paparazzi?
A: The intrusion of the media today is offset by the openness of some gay performers — though not romantic leading men just yet. As Tom Cruise’s career shows, it is possible to withstand rumors and media speculation if you have the power and the will to do so. Because Clift was never as closeted as Rock Hudson, I don’t believe he would fight terribly hard to maintain the illusion of offscreen heterosexuality. He might be more likely to take a Keanu Reeves approach, where the actor neither courts nor tries to dispel the fantasies of any fan. In several roles in the severely repressive 1950s he even courted audiences to read his characters — and maybe himself — as gay in the casually flirtatious scenes in Red River, the rejection of heterosexual relationships in I Confess, Suddenly, Last Summer, and Freud, the material on gay Army life that acts as a subtext throughout From Here to Eternity, and the relationship with Frank Sinatra’s character in the film.
Source: Advocate, The Most Beautiful Man in Film
3,267 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 1601 – 1800 of 3267 Newer› Newest»Reality is overrated.
tbh, the one thing that makes me now doubt J&A are Austin's inane tweets - how could Jake put up with someone who could write that? ;) jk Sensitive Julian is facetious and sometimes I don't know what to make of Aus10. Only if he's talking about the environment is it worth reading. I'm not getting into the silly Adam Levine fray.
how could Jake put up with someone who could write that?
I agree, Austin's tweets are major disappointment.
I wouldn't say that but they are sometimes a little juvenile. Sorry, Austin!
But he was great tweeting about the Gulf, and I do like his philosophical quotes, and writing. But silliness would get on my nerves bigtime. Aus! lol
Gulf - you forgot his idiotic tweets about BT?
BP, BP LOL
He tweeted about BT? or BP?
Gulf, oil and BP.
:) His and Sophia's reports of what was going on were great - I haven't got a whole lot of sympathy for BP anyway. BT, I don't know. Poor baby.
You wish, trolly!
His and Sophia's reports of what was going on were great
Please. Austin and Sophia were less than a day there but they tried to present themselves like Gulf experts and new Messiahs - everything for self promotion! Austin's tweets about BP made him look like ignorant fool.
Javier Bardem makes my ovaries quiver and vibrate.
about 24 hours ago via web
adamlevine: @AUS10NICHOLS it astonishes me when you talk like that...but yeah me too...
about 23 hours ago via Echofon in reply to AUS10NICHOLS
@adamlevine I'm organizing a flight with you, me and Javi for a romantic weekend to Oviedo.
about 22 hours ago via Twitter for BlackBerry® in reply to adamlevine
I can't believe Jake is friends with them. Jake comes off as more intelligent and down to earth.
Javier Bardem makes my ovaries quiver and vibrate.
Ewwwwww!
"Javier Bardem makes my ovaries quiver and vibrate."
Mine too. Hence I'm having his baby.
Javier Bardem makes my ovaries quiver and vibrate.
Hate it when gays use female terms for their sex organs.
The entire exchange is cringeworthy. Father material? I think not. :)
You notice Jake has the good sense not to have a Twitter account. :)
Jake tweeting about his pussy hunt ways ... could be fun!
Being silly in an appropriate forum like Twitter is a sign of happiness, of having a childlike soul and a fun, creative mind. Some of you need to loosen up, relax and get that stick out of your butt. Take a class in sculpture, art, theatre. Learn and appreciate different personalities; everyone isn't like you, thank god!
Sorry 10:48 PM, we can recognize happiness, fun and childlike soul, but a lot of Austin's tweets are simply stupid.
Learn and appreciate different personalities
What is there to appreciate about Austin?
10:48, I think you need to loosen up and allow other people to think the way they want to. If Austin's tweets don't appeal to certain of us, what' it to ya? Oh I forgot, we've got to accept Austin totally dammit. He's beyond criticism. Well, I think his tweets are condescending and dumb, ok? I'll give you that they are childlike, I agree. And Adam sounds like a jerk as well.
LOL, 10:48 struck a nerve.
Happiness, fun and a childlike soul, and also concern about the environment, are to be found in other, extremely creative, and intelligently humorous Twitter accounts, and I won't name names and keep repeating myself. :)
Austin's sound like a frat boy's.
Bullshit 11:08 PM, do try to read comments.
Austin's sound like a frat boy's.
He does.
Twitter is Austin's only outlet after a long day at work, then running after two BT's at home while his husband is away, pussy prowling with Adam Levine
LOL
jakehet: 2day saw cute girl leaving yoga, i slammed dor in her face +ran to my car+made donkey sound @her
6 hours ago
LMAO!
Every man should do his best to find the right female heterosexual woman of the opposite sex!
Is that you SK - still obsessed with GB/UV/FL
jakehet: asked bodacious chik working@coffeehous if she like painful unnatural sex+coke
yesterday about 18 hours ago
No one is obsessed with GB/UV/FL - we just love to make fun of them.
jakehet: just got big boner! =saw huge titted lady in soho street p.s. what ru suposed 2 do w/tits ?
1 hour ago
Almost everyone rides the subway in NYC. Cab prices have gone up and there are extra fees. Earlier this evening it cost me $14.25 dollars (including tip) to go 40 streets downtown and 8 avenues (East/West). I only did that because I would have to ride 3 different subway lines and then walk a few blocks. It took 15 minutes to hail a cab, too. Hiring a car from Manhattan to Brooklyn (near his sister is $45 plus tip). Did that once. It also takes a long time if there is traffic (about an hour on okay days). His sister lives near several subway lines and depending where he took it, it wouldn’t take that long. I don’t know exactly where she lives but the 2/3 (when running correctly) gets you to Grand Army Plaza very quickly from midtown.
I see well known people NYCers on the subway and I am not a daily user (I walk to work).
jakehet: just got big boner! =saw huge titted lady in soho street p.s. what ru suposed 2 do w/tits ?
Sex for Dummies [Illustrated]
jakehet: time 2 look+jerk @new blue boy mag w/hot butches! bye!
17 minutes ago
jakehet: wtf? sthing wrong w/twitter, should read: time 2 look+jerk @new big boob mag w/hot bitches! bye!
15 minutes ago
$14.25 dollars (including tip) to go 40 streets downtown and 8 avenues
That's a bargain in SoCal! My car accidentally got towed and I made the people get me a cab to take me from their place to the impound lot 2 or 3 miles away/10-15 minute ride and it cost (them, lol) close to 25 dollars! (along with the $800 impound fee (I was gone on vacation), they'll never do that again lol) It's not the distance necessarily, it's the time on the meter sitting at lights and in traffic. IMO the NY cab fares are fairly reasonable but if you do it a lot (and it's tempting) they add up big and fast. CA cab fares are higher but cabs are generally only used for emergencies, trips to/from the airport, when you're drunk, etc.
Sign of Stupidity is a Childlike Brain
Who the hell are you talking to and wtf about?!
P.S. "childlike" is a much sought-after attribute; it is NOT the same as "childish." And here you thought you were oh so smart, lol.
You better go check Webster's again, dear.
You say childlike; I say simpleton. It's annoying.
You better go check Webster's again, dear.
LOL check yourself.
childlike: Like or befitting a child, as in innocence, trustfulness, or candor.
It's not just a definition in a dictionary - anyone can look it up and like you, find an interpretation that fits your purpose so you can say that it means the same as "childish." The word "childlike" holds a large role in literature. A person schooled in literary classics and fine arts is fully aware of the meaning of "childlike" ~ innocence, trustfulness, candor, wonder, purity, openness. Attributes that are lost upon our maturity and thus are highly valued if an adult can recapture the spirit of them to some degree.
childlike definitions
Oh please, you don't know what I think, or have the gall to "inform" me of anything. Some of those tweets are not childlike, but childish. I think it's you who needs to get your definitions straight.
Some of those qualities are not desirable in an adult, at least all the time. You need to recognize a play on words in literature as well.
As for the latest PR tactic, its no coincidence that its timed for LAOD where Jake plays a straight horn dog. His appearance lately is similar to how he looked a few years ago when he was depressed after he and Austin broke up. I think Jake is a pretty fragile guy. His career is in a lull. He made a huge sacrifice for POP and we know how that worked out. He passed on Avatar. I think Jake does not want the words I am not gay out there any more than he does the words I am gay. Too awkward for when he finally comes out. He wants to avoid lying so silence is the best solution. This could just be a misguided effort by Adam to help a friend who is on the skids, relatively speaking. As for Austin going along with the charade, after watching Jake beard with Reese for all that time, this bit is a cakewalk.
What's a cakewalk for Austin?
At 3am last night a stereo blasted out from one of the other neighbors' apartments in our little Spanish style courtyard here. It's a lovely little place here. Very faded and worn -- pretty cheap to get a place to rent in the middle of Hollywood. A fountain bubbles at its center.
Within three minutes of the music rattling everything, I was down in the courtyard. Angry. Bewildered. So was another neighbor, a wonderful, young composer confronting our un-sober music lover and his boyfriend in a shirt with the shimmering word lust across his chest.
...
Music of the Spheres
YAY! Getting to see Jake Gyllenhaal this Saturday. I'm so blessed! :)
about 8 hours ago via web
@Cynthia_Alarcon A friend of mine had an extra ticket to a q & a thing he's doing in times sq so she's giving it to me! :)
about 8 hours ago via web in reply to Cynthia_Alarcon
I've never seen Mr. Gyllenhaal in person. I'm SO excited. Thanks, Marisa! <3
about 8 hours ago via web
shedia_m
confronting our un-sober music lover and his boyfriend in a shirt with the shimmering word lust across his chest
LOL, got to love gays :)
I have a shirt like that!
Jake, Ricky is in NYC this weekend too ;)
That was a nice post from Stephen. I like his writing at times. :)
OT but is anyone else as excited as I am to see Kurt hook up with Sam?!
Sam is dreamy. There are alot of bait and switch rumors out there but I'm still sticking to the original spoiler that he'll be Kurt's bf.
Tom Hardy, the celebrity bisexual star of Inception, is saying goodbye to gentlemen: He's engaged to girlfriend Charlotte Riley, the British actress. Though you never know what types of relationships famous folks have, so there might be hope for you yet.
Queerty
^^^ comment:
To those who have doubts that this engagement may be a creation of his publicist and or managment you need to realize exactaly how the system works. For decades there has been a tremendous battle waged by actors versus their publicists regarding the matter of comming out. These days more actors are more adpt to admit to it realizing that it is no longer the absolute kiss of death for a career. Publicists not so much. Realize a publicist and or managment firm doesn't actually give a flying fcuk about the actual person they are representing. Their actual client is the reputation and public face of the person. Anything that "damages" the reputation and public perception will in turn hurt the publicist in their wallet.
The timing of this particular announcment seems suspect. A month after his discussing Bi-sexuality, and his publicist frantically denying it was anything more than a nano-second of his life the engagement is announced……..If the announcment is somehow legit, all the best to the happy couple………
I have a friend who is an entertainment lawyer and they actually create legal binding documents for marriages/engagements which are completley for show. One of the most famous Gays who broke millions of womans hearts back in I guess the 1950's with the news of his "engagement" and subsquent "marriage" was Rock Hudson. When the lawyers are creating these documents he told me to make sure everyone is on the same page as to what the actual status of the relationship they still to this day refer to them as a "Rock solid marriages/engagements"…….. :p
There are alot of bait and switch rumors out there but I'm still sticking to the original spoiler that he'll be Kurt's bf.
Me too. I'm imagining Kurt meeting Sam and having his eyes light up with his little predator facial expression lol, but thinking "he's cute but he's a star quarterback and straight, oh well.." and Sam ignoring him but then later asking Kurt for help on a song or something, suggesting that they meet at his house and then Sam flirting with Kurt and then Kurt's dad coming home and thinking Kurt's hurt or sick because he hears moans coming from his bedroom and so he rushes in only to find.... well you know. ;)
After writing that I'm sure there's gotta be Glee slash (with Kurt paired up with everybody lol) somewhere out there. Heehee my project for today!!
Jenny, Kiki (maybe RW) said...
Wow - two females (and they are from years ago). Please don't even bother with the "maybe RW," lol.
A friend of mine had an extra ticket to a q & a thing he's doing in times sq
Jake is doing LAOD Q&A today?
Didja read that while tweet sequence?
^^^ whole
Oops, Saturday, not LAOD :)
The troll is in a tizzy. Ted keeps confirming that Baby Tile is real despite PRs efforts to convince the world that Jake is straight.
Tom Hardy is going to come face to face with his own words. There is a youtube of him on Jonathon Ross where he talks about being on drugs, waking up naked, in bed with another man. The punch line of his story was not that he was in bed with a man but they had a loaded gun in the bed with them. It was the gun that scared the bejesus out of him not the man. His being bi is what makes him extra sexy. Women love a dangerous man and he reeks of edgy danger.
In that magazine interview Tom Hardy made very clear that he's straight. No, I don't believe him, but that's his official answer.
I think you're confusing Tom Hardy with some of the characters he's played. In actuality he comes from an upper middle class background and was educated in some reallly exclusive schools.
How long Jake's gonna be able to hide his kid?
Can we discuss the subject and posters who believe there might be a kid write their true opinion?
Out Magazine: Catching Up With Mike O'Malley
Glee has broken the television mold in more ways than one. Its portrayal of what at first appeared to be a homophobic father (named Burt) rejecting his musical-loving gay son (yep, named Kurt) ultimately painted a picture of unconditional parental love. On the cusp of the September 21 second season premiere, we caught up with Mike O’Malley, the Emmy-nominated actor who plays the anything-but-stereotypical father tugging at our heart. (continued at link)
In actuality he comes from an upper middle class background and was educated in some reallly exclusive schools.
That's nice, but what that has to do with Tom's homo sex and partying too hard?
Tweets prove Adam and Austin are still in touch. If Jake and Austin are still together, Adam knows it. That would make his statement in OUT a blatant lie, no?
The troll scared, Ted confirmed BT and they are both breast feeding the rugrats right now!!
Unless they aren't together, and it's just two attention whore mutual pals tweeting and having shits and giggles over internet rumors!
And Austin twitter now following Stephen Gyllenhaal and now Busy Phillips but mere coincidin-ki!
That would make his statement in OUT a blatant lie, no?
Austin has nothing to do with Jake's sexuality. Adam's statement has nothing to do with the truth.
3:02, sometimes they are the ones who have the most wild lives. ;)
Really, Austin's following Jake's dad and Busy? That's interesting.
Why?
And Austin twitter now following Stephen Gyllenhaal and now Busy Phillips but mere coincidin-ki!
Austin is Jake's friend for years and years, of course he met Jake's family - so what is the significance of following Jake's father?
Why?
Austin's following Jake's family and friends. Looks like he and Jake are still friends, at the very least.
Women love a dangerous man and he reeks of edgy danger.
I love a man who reeks of testosterone, but you don't want him to be too dangerous. ;)
I don't remember anyone suggesting that Jake and Austin aren't friends anymore.
Can we discuss the subject and posters who believe there might be a kid write their true opinion?
That would be great, but BT believers don't care about opinions and discussions, they expect you to believe.
That would be great, but BT believers don't care about opinions and discussions, they expect you to believe.
Well, maybe some care about opinions and discussions? Why not listen to all opinions before brushing them off?
Can a celebrity like Jake successfully hide a 3 year old, without anyone noticing and trust those who know? Jake is a guy who seems to be travelling a lot, his partner is a regular in a series in Wilmington. Does Jake take the kid and nanny with him everywhere he goes? There are no sightings of him with a child. There were one in London last year, but most seemed to believe it was Ramona.
Well, maybe some care about opinions and discussions? Why not listen to all opinions before brushing them off?
We are listening.
Looks to me that BT believers don't like to talk because opinions are questioned and you are expected to explain your arguments.
Can a celebrity like Jake successfully hide a 3 year old, without anyone noticing and trust those who know?
It is easy to hide a kid - lock him in a soundproof room and voilà ! The question is can a celebrity raise a healthy kid and keep him a secret. Kids need other kids, need to learn about the world and need to spend a lot of time with their parent(s).
How long Jake's gonna be able to hide his kid?
I still can't believe that Ted compared BT to other Hollywood secrets like drugs and affairs, and the he doesn't see anything special or wrong about hiding a kid for years and years.
The question is can a celebrity raise a healthy kid and keep him a secret
No, they couldn't. It's not just about playing with other kids and spending time with parents, although that's true, too. But can you imagine growing up and then finding out your parents out and out lied about your actual existence? That they said, "I hope to be a parent one day, blah, blah" when you were already born? Only a crazy person would do that to a child. Jake may be a lot of things, but he's not insane.
Wouldn't the kid as a grown up understand that his father had to lie about his existence in order to save his career and keep the living standard?
Maybe. But no kid would ever be OK with father who wouldn't take him to Zoo or toy shop.
No career should come at that cost. :( You shouldn't have kids in that case, if you could help it.
True, but many rich people who don't hide their tots leave those things to nannies.
And the kids are sometimes the worse for it. I don't understand why you'd want to have a child and leave him or her with a caretaker? Most parents want to share those things with their children, going to the zoo, and especially showing them and teaching them about the world. Especially if the child was supposedly planned for and wanted?
Supposedly planned? If Jake banged a chick it could have been an accident. But he and Austin had a surrogate mother. It was planned!
I say supposedly because I don't know if that whole scenario is true.
True, but many rich people who don't hide their tots leave those things to nannies.
True, but a bit of sex is all that takes for them to become parents, not so easy for gay men so they have to think more about that decision and really want kids.
Wouldn't the kid as a grown up understand that his father had to lie about his existence in order to save his career and keep the living standard?
There are a lot of years to get through before becoming a "grown up" and in the meantime the damage would already be done.
True, but many rich people who don't hide their tots leave those things to nannies.
Not comparable. They're not denying that they even have kids.
So J and A are planning to get baby via surrogate - a decision that causes much money, time, patience etc. - and then they hide the child and do not even spend some time together?
What a happy family!
Well, that is one of the arguments that BT doesn't exist.
If Jake banged a chick it could have been an accident.
LOL Jake banging a chick would be an accident. "You're a girl?! I thought you were an effeminate boy with a prelubed hole and a small penis"
:)
Actually 5:20 PM, I'm a hermaphrodite. ;)
5:03 PM
That's her!
5:03 PM
LOL one leg is hairy and the other is shaved!
The pic looks like an old queened-up Jake after being forced to come out because of the pictures the National Enquirer published of him and a young underage boy playing naked with Austin the pot bellied pig, in BT's (his imaginary friend) Barbie bed with poor Atticus watching, then subsequently getting blackballed in Hollywood, started drinking again and then had to resort to doing "Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?" dinner theatre in Topeka.
Fuck!
And Austin twitter now following Stephen Gyllenhaal and now Busy Phillips but mere coincidin-ki!
You forgot to mention that Stephen and Busy don't follow Austin.
Stephen follows HeathUltimate and Ennis_DelMar twitter accounts.
http://twitter.com/stephgyllenhaal
LOL 6:18 Sorry, I had to laugh
LOL, Stephen follows someone named # GyllenhaaLedger with a background "Jake and Heath Forever". OMG!
Maybe Stephen is into slash? ;)
How well did Stephen know Heath?
I don't know but there're a lot of Heath icons in his "following" list. Maybe he was a fan?
LOL, Stephen follows someone named # GyllenhaaLedger with a background "Jake and Heath Forever". OMG!
twitter.com/@mmk_83
Wow, Stephen! :)
Maybe it's Papa's way of keeping track of jake's sites. The girl @mmk 83 runs a Jake site.
I also noticed that Papa's FB account is open and it looks like a lot of Jake fan's have joined.
I guess Papa realizes that Jake is his way to get any attention, who else bought his shitty book of poetry?
I also think he is a hypocrite when he trashed the Jake sites for invading his family privacy when in fact he has on more than one occassion outed where he lives (WEHO) and posted a video that revealed the address to maggie and Peter's home in Brooklyn along with him whining about how he doesn't have as much $$$ as he did before.
How well did Stephen know Heath?
*cough*
Maybe it's Papa's way of keeping track of jake's sites
That was my thought, too. You're also correct that having a famous son is a way to get attention for his own movies/books, etc.
Jakey G... you've read "Flowers in the Attic" one too many times haven't you?
Attic
What? There's a big basement under my room?
Beautifully OT or maybe on topic -
Does anyone think JGL looks a lot like Heath here?
Resemblance
Actor Disowned For Gay Role
Indian actor Yuvraaj Parasher, who starred in a film considered the country's Brokeback Mountain, has been thrown out of his home and disowned by his family for playing a gay man on screen, reports Times of India. The film, Dunno Y ... Na Jaane Kyun, features the first male same-sex kiss not played for laughs in the history of Bollywood, one of the world's most prolific film industries, but one that has never tackled storylines revolving around gay male characters. The newspaper reports that Parasher's father is ready to go to court and officially cut off ties with his son.
"His mother is totally devastated," the elder Parasher says. "We are a respected family and I'm appalled that he is playing a gay man's role. We're finished. All the dreams and hopes we had built around him are over. For just a film role, he has lost out on his blood ties. We don't want to see his face ever... not even when we are dying."
Does anyone think JGL looks a lot like Heath here?
yeah, I think there are a lot of pictures where they resemble each other. a few weeks ago, someone posted a JGL picture on the Heath thread at DC thinking it was a young Heath until someone pointed out that it was a young JGL (it was clearly JGL, though, idk what the hell they were thinking)
Does anyone think JGL looks a lot like Heath here?
Not a lot, but he does. Heath looked like a man, JGL looks like a big kid.
We don't want to see his face ever... not even when we are dying.
Parents of the year.
Wow, that's nasty about that Indian actor. I'm so sorry to read that. :(
How well did Stephen know Heath?"
Why don't you ask him?
IDK, there's something about JGL's face that's incredibly sexy I think. I do see a little bit of a resemblance to Heath. I loved that kiss in Inception. I'm hoping he'll be in the next Nolan Batman film.
Jakey G... you've read "Flowers in the Attic" one too many times haven't you?
LOL. Good thing there's only one BT - if I remember correctly, the brother and sister in "Flowers in the Attic" ended up marrying each other, lol.
Kurt and Sam
Tom Hardy
there's something about JGL's face that's incredibly sexy
This is a Jake site. Please post sexy things only about Jake. Thank you.
:) Sorry hunny you're at the top of that sexy list too, y'know. :*
Duh! :)
Jake, did you start looking for husband material?
Jake, did you start looking for husband material?
*cough* Actually I've been looking for harem material.
What harem material???
So J and A are planning to get baby via surrogate - a decision that causes much money, time, patience etc. - and then they hide the child and do not even spend some time together?
What a happy family!
I don't know anything about this but, when two men have a surrogate baby isn't there some kind of involvement with the people or agency that allowed or agreed upon this situation happening? You know, kind of like an adoption whereas the adoption agency keeps in touch with the apotive parents? Would it be the same for surrogate parents, especially two men who can't do all the things a natural mother does like breast feed? Just saying.
It does not look like Austin or Jake are half way interested in any of that type of thing. They are constantly apart for long lengths of time on different coast and Austin has someone attached to him all the time named Sophia.
Love my Jakey boy but Jake's grizzly adams hobo look would not make the cut with any child protective agency or group. Sorry.
^^ this is better ^^
IT MAKES NO SENSE WHATSOEVER.
Those guys are not that stupid and shallow to do such a thing. Straght, gay or bi.
"IDK, there's something about JGL's face that's incredibly sexy I think. I do see a little bit of a resemblance to Heath. I loved that kiss in Inception. I'm hoping he'll be in the next Nolan Batman film."
You are not alone..:-) But I would not be surprised if he does the rumoured "Zom-Rom-Com" instead.
A user over at Awards Daily has seen LAOD:
"After seeing her [Anne] movie, I certainly hope not. She isn't bad, she's just nothing at all special and neither is the film. I can't say anything else because I did sign something but I am completely baffled by how this movie, or anything about it, has Oscar buzz."
BTW I find it odd that with all the sightings fo Jake in NY we have not seen one single pciture.
Someone stupid enough to think bearding with the Chin was going to make him a big star and turn him magically straight is dumb enough to have a baby and hide it. Jake also doesn't have the balls to stand up to all his handlers.
Poor BT, he/she is going to be one seriously fucked up person.
LAOD was rejected for the major festivals. There is no Oscar chance. If it isn't clear by now, people are in denial.
Anyway, so what? Maybe it's still a fun flick?
You are not alone..:-) But I would not be surprised if he does the rumoured "Zom-Rom-Com" instead.
:) The "Zom-Rom-Com" actually sounds different and interesting. 500 Days was different too.
But I would looooooove to see him in Batman 3.
Someone stupid enough to think bearding with the Chin was going to make him a big star and turn him magically straight is dumb enough to have a baby and hide it.
Bullshit.
^^Poor deluded BT believer doesn't like the truth LOL!!11!!
James Franco on Letterman:
ontd
tweets about a pic of Busy's daughter:
@Busyphilipps25 pretty much the coolest kid I know. Say hello for me.
And I thought I was the coolest kid he knows. :(
"But I would looooooove to see him in Batman 3."
Me too but there are so many rumours floating aroung - I would not be surprised if Nolan comes with someone completely unexpected. Hopes not high - no disappointment :-)
For Jakes sake I hope LAOD will be a financial success - with films like this one awards are not important but Box Office is.
Interested in seeing Francos "Howl" but no chance with the limited release.
For Jakes sake I hope LAOD will be a financial success
Hope so too.
Jake also doesn't have the balls to stand up to all his handlers.
... but he had the balls to have a secret baby which is 100% proof of his gayness and would fuck up his public image if he got busted?
... because general public doesn't like bad fathers.
Tomorrow there will be another screening of LAOD in New York City.
Do they want to create buzz with all those screenings?
What buzz if people can't post about it? "I can't say anything else because I did sign something ..."
I don't know anything about this but, when two men have a surrogate baby isn't there some kind of involvement with the people or agency that allowed or agreed upon this situation happening? You know, kind of like an adoption whereas the adoption agency keeps in touch with the apotive parents?
No. Surrogate mother and egg donor give up all their rights, men are legal parents and no one checks up on them.
Damn!
BT said...
And I thought I was the coolest kid he knows. :(
Aw, poor BT. I guess kids are cooler when they get to leave the basement!
Tomorrow there will be another screening of LAOD in New York City.
Is it possible that they still didn't finish the movie, that they want feedback to make the final cut?
Dear Ted:
I feel like a broken record here because I've asked this question way more than once without you responding, but why is it that you've updated just about every B.V. lately except for Judas Jack-Off and his boyfriend, Dashed Dingle-Dream? Are these two too boring nowadays to make you want to dish about them anymore, and if so how can that be? It's been a year now since you last wrote a column about them. Hasn't anything changed about them that's blog worthy?
—Jayne
Dear Jerked-Off:
Maybe 'cause you all ask about this duo in the Bitch-Backs so much that I don't even want to Vice ‘em. Plus, there are so many other Blinds that are keeping me far more entertained these days. Judy ‘n' Dash have gotten a little ho-hum, as of late.
Dear Ted:
When I've chanced the boards I've noticed mention of "rules" to your Blind Vice articles. Will you clue us all in? Specifically this one: The Friday Blind Vice will have been mentioned in the Mon-Thurs (of the current week) Bitch-Back posts. Is this true? Are there other helpful tidbits you can share? Now to press my luck—when did Toothy make his Awful Truth debut? Was it before you began assigning Blind Vice monikers? Cheers!
—Kristen
Dear First Rule of Vices:
No formal rules for my Vices, babe. Sure, sometimes I like to leave a clue or two in the B.B.s that week (or the celeb at hand might just be who everyone is talking about), but they aren't always in the mail bags—just ask Moisty Mohr. As for the Toothster, that was way back in 2005, in a B.V. that will infamously remain: "One Adorable Blind Vice."
Dear Ted:
Have we ever seen Baby Tile in photos and not realized the connection to Toothy? I'm just curious whether Baby Tile has been hiding under our noses all along.
—Curious
Dear Tile Overload:
Ah, the adorable saga of Baby Tile! Trust, B.T. has never appeared in a paparazzi pic. Toothy would never allow it.
Bitch Back
I would not be surprised if Nolan comes with someone completely unexpected. Hopes not high - no disappointment :-)
Me too - Nolan never disppoints, plus JGL will be in other films. But...I keep wondering if any replacement will have The Joker's mojo. Don't know. We'll see!
For Jakes sake I hope LAOD will be a financial success - with films like this one awards are not important but Box Office is.
Me too! :) I plan to see it.
Interested in seeing Francos "Howl" but no chance with the limited release.
I want to see this very much. I love stories about the Beat era and the people. :)
As for the Toothster, that was way back in 2005, in a B.V. that will infamously remain: "One Adorable Blind Vice."
Awwwww! :)
Dear Ted:
My friend and I have been arguing about this for days now. Is it a fair assumption that most closeted gay actors shy away from playing gay men onscreen? I think that they would be too worried about being outed if they took these roles. Or am I wrong and taking these roles is the ultimate way to throw the public off?
—Em
Dear Gay for Pay:
Totally wrong, babe. 'Cause you're using the exact logic these actors figure folks will have, which is why they definitely play a gay role from time to time. It's the best way—aside from a hottie beard, of course—to fight off rumors.
Bitch Back
Duh!
Ah, the adorable saga of Baby Tile! Trust, B.T. has never appeared in a paparazzi pic. Toothy would never allow it.
Adorable?????
Oops, there goes Paris pic/video, BT believers will be pissed.
Trust, B.T. has never appeared in a paparazzi pic. Toothy would never allow it.
I wonder if BT believers will now admit it wasn't BT in the stroller in Paris.
Nah, they will find a way to spin it.
Saga=story-fanfic, they still don't get it?
Nah, they will find a way to spin it.
Sure enough - they already tried! LOL.
What did BT believers already try?
What did BT believers already try?
To spin what Ted said.
Claiming that there are two BTs?
BT in Paris was from a video.
BT in Paris - paparazzi video and IHJ gallery paparazzi photos.
A new biography claims that even though Humphrey Bogart slept with 1,000 women, he still suspected he himself might be gay.
Claiming that there are two BTs?
Claiming that the kid in the Paris pic is still BT because Ted said "paparazzi pic" and not video, which is nonsense. If Toothy is not going to allow a pic of the supposed kid to get out, he wouldn't have him wandering around Paris near him. idk what they think about the two BTs nonsense. I'm sure some of them still believe it.
Claiming that the kid in the Paris pic is still BT because Ted said "paparazzi pic" and not video, which is nonsense.
Which is a stupid lie - we do have paparazzi picture from Paris.
Claiming that the kid in the Paris pic is still BT because Ted said "paparazzi pic" and not video, which is nonsense.
Someone on OMG said that Paris BT paparazzi photos don't exist?
^^ WoW talk about Crazy and grasping for straws. Just randomly pick anyone with a baby and a stroller near Jake ans "Wala"
it's the elusive BT. I don't get it.
The picture seems like one of those situations where the lense pics up not only the target wanted, which is Reese and Jake but also the innocent people behind them and the people in front of them. Including woman with baby. This is usually done because of taking a picture from far away (Zoom lense). This is all according to where the camera man is postioned. And they say thats the nanny and BT? Why would he do so a silly thing? It doesn't make sense. POPPYcock.
Which is a stupid lie - we do have paparazzi picture from Paris.
Yeah, it didn't make sense that there was a video, but no pics. But they'll try to spin that, too.
Someone on OMG said that Paris BT paparazzi photos don't exist?
^^^ They don't
The picture seems like one of those situations where the lense pics up not only the target wanted, which is Reese and Jake but also the innocent people behind them and the people in front of them. Including woman with baby.
^^ And my point was, the people behind and in front of R/J could have been a really good distance from them. Even if the people where pictured near each other during these set of pictures, it does not mean they were together. All of these people look like they were sight-seeing tourist just as J/R were.
Claiming that the kid in the Paris pic is still BT because Ted said "paparazzi pic" and not video, which is nonsense.
Which is a stupid lie - we do have paparazzi picture from Paris.
Of course there is this pic of "BT". But since Ted said BT is not featured in any pics, it isn't the baby in the pic that many BT believers thought was BT.
Funny how everyone is tripping all over themselves to claim Ted's words are gospel when I bet some of the people doing that are also the ones who claim that Ted is full of shit and made up BT.
Of course Jake doesn't "allow" pap photos of BT to be "featured" ala Reese and her kids, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen accidentally, as I believe it did in Paris.
Of course Jake doesn't "allow" pap photos of BT to be "featured" ala Reese and her kids, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen accidentally, as I believe it did in Paris.
there is no BT Destiny.
No babytile
Jake and Austin don't even socialize that much. Jake in NY riding subway, Austin tweeting his every dumb move while with Sophia. NO BT.
But wait a second, Destiny. Hasn't the party line always been that Jake or his people always see pap pics first and decide which ones get published? Or is that only the case when you want it to be the case?
Where is the time for a baby from Jake or Austin?
Where is the time for raising a child from J/A?
Funny how everyone is tripping all over themselves to claim Ted's words are gospel when I bet some of the people doing that are also the ones who claim that Ted is full of shit and made up BT.
Nothing funny about that - Ted's words are gospel only to BT believers.
I find it quite sad for Jake that many seem more interested in his private life = TT/BT than his movies. His peers deliver b.o. hits, critically acclaimed movies and he is "accused" of being a secret gay who is hiding a toddler.
If Ted made TT/BT up, Jake can't do anything about it, cause it's a BV, even if everyone assumes it's him. Either Ted wants to make people question Jake's integrity out of spite and a personal vendetta, or he was fed wrong info, or those ridiculous sounding stories (TT, BT) are true.
I'm sort of sick of all this and want to enjoy a movie or performance of his again. I became a fan of his acting first and foremost.
Ted's words are gospel only to BT believers
... and that is why BT believers can NOT have it both ways - use Ted answers as argument that BT exist and claim that there are BT Paris photos.
Funny how everyone is tripping all over themselves to claim Ted's words are gospel when I bet some of the people doing that are also the ones who claim that Ted is full of shit and made up BT.
I don't believe he made up BT, destiny, but I do belive he got fooled. And you're spinning pretty fast - where did you get the word "featured"?
His peers deliver b.o. hits, critically acclaimed movies and he is "accused" of being a secret gay who is hiding a toddler.
His peers are uninteresting as persons.
Post a Comment