Tuesday, 16 February 2010
Happiness is a Choice
Portia de Rossi knew her "quiet life" was over when she fell for Ellen DeGeneres. Now, with a new book and a passionate taste for politics, she’s ready to step forward as the first lady of our fight for marriage equality.
She has that least likely of all Hollywood endings — a marriage everyone believes is the real deal. "It’s one thing to have attention; it’s one thing to stand for something," she says. "But unless it’s backed up with genuine happiness, I think people can sense that it’s not worth celebrating."
Whenever anyone asks De Rossi about marriage equality — and, grateful for whatever "little tiny platform" she’s given, she hopes they will — she reveals herself to be an impeccably prepared spokeswoman, a perfectly poised first lady of advocacy. Further proof will come in March when the Human Rights Campaign will acknowledge De Rossi with its Visibility Award at a ceremony in Los Angeles.
A year and a half after their 2008 wedding, she and DeGeneres are still that almost obnoxiously adorable couple. If anything, getting married has only made them more so. Even the paparazzi seem to buy into their love story, mostly leaving the two alone. "To think that a married gay couple is considered boring and normal is fantastic," she says. "Happiness is a choice too. It’s a choice to live in a state of gratitude and to fix what makes you unhappy. Being honest with who you are, being able to go out into the world and show people that you can be successful and be happy and be in a good marriage — it’s important."
She makes another straightforward "case closed" argument for actors coming out, usual Hollywood scare tactics be damned. "People say, 'There are lots of openly gay actors.' And I’m like, who? If everybody I knew that was gay and not being open about it came out, it would make a huge difference to people coming up as young actors in Hollywood. Huge. To producers, to people in casting. I’m sure that when I was with Ellen a lot of people wondered if I could play a straight role convincingly. By having the opportunity, other people can go, 'Oh, that’s OK. It didn’t kill that show. That was believable.'"
In comparison to her wife, at least, "I haven’t said 'I’m gay' that often," she says. Maybe that was true back when the idea of Portia as the femme fatale still cast such a long shadow over her public life.
This is what she has to say now: "Being on Oprah was a very surreal moment — to go from being so closeted and so afraid to talk about my sexuality to sitting with my wife, talking about my wedding and how much I love her. To look out at that audience and see most of the audience crying — Oprah was crying! Life can take so many twists and turns. You can’t ever count yourself out. Even if you’re really afraid at some point, you can’t think that there’s no room for you to grow and do something good with your life."
Source: Advocate, The Great de Rossi
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2,782 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 1601 – 1800 of 2782 Newer› Newest»Worthington is a undoublty a good actor for the lead in action movie. Other than that I don't know , he doesn't seem to be a subtle actor enough able to deliver a "fin" performance. I may be wrong though.
Avatar plot is weak, naive and "dejà vu" yes it's visually great but that all!
It's mean but I am glad abby left ryan, she deserves much better than this plain untalented guy.
I think Jake Gyllenhaal is another example as well as Brad Pitt and Johnny Depp
DUH!
"[I keep my Oscar in the bathroom so people] can sneakily have a little [hold] and put it back down again. Because basically everybody wants to touch it, everybody wants to hold it and go 'Oh, my gosh,' and 'How heavy is it?' So I figured if I put it [in there], then people can avoid the whole, 'Where's your Oscar?' thing."
— Kate Winslet. [People]
"I never really thought about women before - it kind of just happened with Samantha. It surprised me. We're still in touch... If I wasn't with Samantha, I would probably be with a boy next. She's the only woman I've been attracted to. We love each other. We might reconcile the relationship, maybe. I don't know."
— Lindsay Lohan.
LOL, I've been catching up on my GB reading).
Tons of talk about Reese, a lot of it from anons, like this one that started the whole dustup:
Also lots of comments about how they think Reese is just making this all up, and feeding the stories to the tabloids. Funny how magically, three years later, the tabloids lie and/or are manipulated by Reese. LMAO.
This post from UV is particularly priceless.
UV said.....
Anon, 12:14, I say this with all the respect you deserve, no one cares what you think of this site or of bobbyanna or any of us. You know what might make us care: picking a name, sticking with that name and posting about something other than Reese's excellent tabloid adventures.
Until you do that, just shut the fuck up about Reese and this blog.
Yes, we talked about Reese when Jake was with her. Even when they were together, we did not take anything Us or other places said as fact. We liked it when they had pictures. We like pictures of Jake.
When they were together, Us wasn't reliable. They aren't reliable now. Just last week, Us had Reese regretting the break up. Next week, they'll have her married. Who Cares? Unless and until she and Jake get back together or are seen together, whatever Us speculates about is whatever Us wants the story to be.
As suvee said, we're not pretending we don't care about Jake's private life. But we're also not here to speculate endlessly about what is happening in Reese's life. Jake has moved on. So have we. If you can't, then stop posting here.
One more howler from UV:
Contrary to hater blog BS, this is not and has never been a Jake and Reese blog. It is a Jake blog. The focus is not whom Jake sleeps with or whom we want him to sleep with or whom he used to sleep with. People who can't figure that out can go elsewhere.
What's next, babblers will admit that Witherbeard used Jake to get press?
we did not take anything Us or other places said as fact. We liked it when they had pictures. We like pictures of Jake.
LMAO!
LOL. Yeah, as I pointed out a couple pages back, you gotta love babblers just for the entertainment value alone. It's like entering the Bizarro World where everything that was said during Reeke does a 180 post Reeke. NOW everything is PR and fake. But the best is how they're all on a gossip blog but they try to pretend they're above gossip! HI-larious!
I remember you saying that Gotta Love Babblers. I check over there about once a week, and finally got around to it, and just had to post some of the juiciest bits. Never seen anything quite like these recent posts.
Delusional and revisionists to the end. :-D :-D :-D
Yeah, as I pointed out a couple pages back, you gotta love babblers just for the entertainment value alone.
I'm trying but it doesn't work - I can't stand those dumb bitches.
It's like entering the Bizarro World where everything that was said during Reeke does a 180 post Reeke.
Did they delete old comments? Or UV thinks that no one would notice her transparent bullshit?
You should see some of the nutty revisionism on DC/Eyelashes, which shrunk drastically after Reeke started. It's a scream.
She knows the little troops won't question her, she cows some of the others, and she deletes and or tries to run off everyone else.
Dictators don't have to worry about the truth.
Tell us, what are they saying on DC?
I won't lie, when I like reading about Jake with no trashtalking, I'll go to GB. I hate being a cynical bitch 24/7. And when I want trashtalk I come here.
Tee hee :)
"I say this with all the respect you deserve: just shut the fuck up"
Dictators can't HANDLE the truth.
I hate being a cynical bitch 24/7
A little non-cynical is good for the soul :)
Hypocritical revisionist babbling on the other hand ...
raw food
LOL
terki:
While changing at the end of my morning yoga class, a dude came in to ask about classes. The voice sounded familiar. It was JAKE GYLLENHAAL.
about 7 hours ago
@pinkmeringue I was the most giggly/excited about it, even though I didn't even see him. It felt very non-yoga of me :/
about 7 hours ago
@tekakwitha Not kidding! I'm sad that I didn't SEE him, but I was changing. OMG, I've been half-naked in the same room as Jake Gyllenhaal.
about 6 hours ago
@echoicmimic He's here for a few months shooting a movie, apparently!
about 6 hours ago
@overlapgreen I didn't see him! It's heartbreaking. I just heard him. We were separated by a curtain while I changed ;)
about 5 hours ago
I won't lie, when I like reading about Jake with no trashtalking, I'll go to GB.
I've visited IHJ twice since Jake dumped the beard, but couldn't stand painfully ignorant posts and had to leave after 5 minutes.
More steaks for me!
raw food
LOL
We like it raw!
Did the "A" have anything to do with the name on the email account you used to submit your question?
*cough*
Cat-fight on OMG, MEOW!!!!!!!
"raw food" LOL. Love how these hipsters think up fancy names. Just call it uncooked, you freaks.
So Abbie and Ryan were kaput when the rumors were rumbling around the time of the Jake and Reese split.
No, there are pictures of Abbie and Ryan from January.
"I won't lie, when I like reading about Jake with no trashtalking, I'll go to GB."
GB is bullshit. I go to WDW when I want to relax and read about Jake's career and funny sometimes unknown tidbits, without any heavy syrup.
Awwww, don't be like that, UV and babblers read tabloids only because they have pictures, babblers like pictures of Jake! lol
Posted on OMG by Matching pinky ring
Marc Malkin at E! and Just Jared have pictures of Austin attending the Black Eye Peas concert last Friday in North Carolina with Sophia and Lee Norris (Mouth from OTH). Of course they are selling bearding BS and they look like a copycat of Reeke at Coachella. But check out Austin’s pinky ring. Exactly the same one Jake has and on the same hand.
Kate from WDW is a nice gal, not a hypocrite at all. I go to WDW when I have time and I like the blog. She never was a homophobe, she used to post H/J (homoerotic) pics and doesn't pretend to be a Heath fan when she isn't (UV anyone!). ;). I never got the feeling she liked Reeke. She supports Jake whatever he does profesionally and privately.
^^professionally
Only babblers or a troll would call a serious discussion or disagreement a catfight.
I wonder if babblers would still be Jake fans if he comes out as gay? I think WDW and her posters totally would.
Good question. I hope that someone who like to visit GB will ask it!
Actually I was tempted to post "fight!" here about Godot but I didn't (someone else did though). I love it when people get into it, that is discussing/arguing over an issue or ideal and not reverting to call each other names like troll or babbler. It's nice that the posters on Godot can do that. The only problem is, I go back and forth agreeing with both of them!
I think if anyone posed such a question it would be deleted.
Good question. I hope that someone who like to visit GB will ask it!
I think if anyone posed such a question it would be deleted.
"I think WDW and her posters totally would."
IA too. WDW is not homophobic and I don't think her posters are either (well about 98% of them; a couple of them are GB enthusiasts, blech).
I think WDW just likes to have fun and relax with all the Jake stuff. Was it last summer when she and another girl (the same one who met Jake at the Nailed luncheon) went to New England and revisited all the places used to film Moonlight Mile? That was funny seeing all the pics and the differences in the 70's set up and what they really look like now. And what's nice is that WDW is adventurous and isn't shy about going places like that and having her pic taken and just having fun discovering it all. GB/UV/FL, have any of them met Jake or gone to where he's been or had their pics posted on their blog? Has anyone ever seen UV or FL? And yet it's ironic that WDW would be the last person to say she knows anything about Jake while GB/UV/FL think they know everything about him.
Austin - pinky ring 1
Austin - pinky ring 2
Kate from WDW is a nice gal, not a hypocrite at all.
Blog is great, Kate is nice, but for me nothing will ever "fix" Kate's support for Reeke.
She never was a homophobe, she used to post H/J (homoerotic) pics
BBMt pictures?
LOL Kate's "support" for Reeke was posting their pics and just playing along to go with the flow and not start any fights on her blog. She never promoted it, got excited about it, predicted marriage or salivated over their supposed love life. She remained neutral IMO. But of course that's probably not enough for you, 4:53.
I think posting Reeke pics and naming the Chin in almost every post WDW did while the bearding lasted, was promoting Reeke.
5:01 PM, if you were in Kate's shoes, would you post Reeke pictures and info on your blog? Every single photo op. Would you?
I'm not 5:01, but I sure wouldn't do that.
5:01 PM, IA.
I think that Austin upping the bearding just when Reeke ended means that they are alternating bearding periods. Now it's Austin's turn to cover for both of them and part of the deal that allowed Jake to end Reeke. Their pics are starting to look similar to Reeke. It shows that faking and lying is annoying, no matter if the beard is more likeable.
I love seeing Jake and Austin wearing matching pinky rings though.
I hope this is just a phase and they go for a glass closet in the near future after PoP is out.
5:01 PM, if you were in Kate's shoes, would you post Reeke pictures and info on your blog? Every single photo op. Would you?
I'm not 5:01 either, but if new pics of Jake have Reese in them, I would post them. I wouldn't like it, but I would post it, to keep my blog and Jake infos up to date. Some posters left sarcastic remarks re. Reeke pics and Kate wasn't bothered by it or erased the comment.
I love seeing Jake and Austin wearing matching pinky rings though.
Do the rings look identical?
I would post only the ones that Jake is alone or cut the Chin out of the pic. Posting Reeke pics is endorsing the bearding.
I think posting Reeke pics and naming the Chin in almost every post WDW did while the bearding lasted, was promoting Reeke.
5:01 PM, if you were in Kate's shoes, would you post Reeke pictures and info on your blog? Every single photo op. Would you?
For fuck's sake, how many pics of Jake weren't Reeke photo ops in the last 3 years?! Nine out of ten pap pic sets were of the gruesome twosome. WDW's policy is to have a new post based on new pics, or to edit a current one to include the new pics and a discussion about the event/situation. Don't blame WDW because the Chin was in 95% of the fucking ass pics taken of Jake.
"Do the rings look identical?"
Same ring, same finger, same hand.
BBMt pictures?
No Jake/Heath. But she also posted/still posts BBM pics or stories related to it. :)
Same ring, same finger, same hand.
Thanks. I was too lazy to check myself.
Same ring, same finger, same hand.
When they're both wearing the rings on their middle "fuck you" fingers, we'll know they got married.
It was not necessary for WDW to post every pic and start every post with "Jake and Reese...did this" "Jake and Reese... did that" blah blah blah it was annoying that she treated them as a couple in every post. Jake should have been the center, not "Jake and Reese". I stopped visiting when she started making Reese as important as Jake on her site and considered them as a unit. You can't control that every new photo op is a bearding one, but you can control what to post and promote on your own site.
She never promoted it
Just Jared posts about Reeke = promotion.
WDW posts about Reeke = promotion.
The principle is the same.
Special managed to write new posts everyday without giving in to the Reeke photos; only times she posted them was to make fun of them.
Oh my 5:26. So I take it you don't look at IHJ, Godot, DC, X17, TMZ, CBS, ABC, NBC, Elle, Vogue, E!, Access Hollywood, People, OK!, Us or any other entertainment tabloids? You know, because they all mentioned or posted about Reeke. Lucky you with only WFT to take up your time.
5:32 PM, what are you talking about? Are you telling us that Reeke and Reese used every opportunity for showmance promotion, like we don't know about that?
Please read the posts before commenting.
5:32 PM
We are discussing Jake's FANDOM.
"It was not necessary for WDW to post every pic and start every post with "Jake and Reese...did this" "Jake and Reese... did that" blah blah blah it was annoying that she treated them as a couple in every post. Jake should have been the center, not "Jake and Reese". I stopped visiting when she started making Reese as important as Jake on her site and considered them as a unit. You can't control that every new photo op is a bearding one, but you can control what to post and promote on your own site."
I think I don't understand your point of view. Kate manages her blog like she wants and if she wanted to consider them as a couple , it's her choice. You can disagree but what you belive about jake sexuality isn't the belief of everyone. I am not disturbed by fans who see him straight, each one at one's place and all will be good. So what is the problem?
Nope, what you were saying is that any and all posts about Reeke were promotion:
Just Jared posts about Reeke = promotion.
WDW posts about Reeke = promotion.
The principle is the same.
Don't pick and choose; most every tabloid or news outlet posted about Reeke, and now you are singling out WDW as "promoting" them?! LOL.
5:45 PM #2, please stop playing stupid, that does not work.
5:45 PM there is no problem at all that she posted every single Reeke photo ops that exists, but it means she is promoting them as a couple. There is people here claiming she was neutral. She wasn't. WDW promoted Reeke.
where should I post that hot homo sex pic of Daddy getting it on with *ears perk up* potato chip bag being opened! *runs to kitchen*
So what is the problem?
There is no problem. We are discussing WDW blog and trying to understand why Kate posted all 2000 Reeke pictures and what we would do in her place.
where should I post that hot homo sex pic of Daddy getting it on with *ears perk up* potato chip bag being opened! *runs to kitchen*
For God's sake Fatticus, stop sleeping and eating long enough to post some juicy pictures!
5:50 #1 please stop trying to cover up your idiocy, irrational blame game and blanket finger-pointing by calling others "stupid" when they catch you and call you on it. That doesn't work either.
"WDW promoted Reeke"
to be fair compared to some gossip blogs it wasn't big big promotion but yes she talked about it from time to time. Once again it's her choice, I still think her blog is more attached to jake professionaly than his private life.
5:57 PM - READ POSTS AND STOP PLAYING STUPID.
"We are discussing WDW blog and trying to understand why Kate posted all 2000 Reeke pictures and what we would do in her place"
simple:
she promoted reeke
we promoted jaustin
end of story no reconciliation possible
Sorry for shouting.
"trying to understand why Kate posted all 2000 Reeke pictures"
She also posted all the Jake solo pics too. No one including her, could help it if Jake decided to beard and have the asshole with him in almost every single thing he did and was papped for. What do you expect WDW to do, talk about and caption "Jake goes to Paris" "Jake gets coffee" "Jake goes to Coachella" "Jake holds hands with a ghost" "Jake sits in a passenger seat while the car is driven by an invisible driver" ??!! Like it or not, of course the asshole's name had to be mentioned. Get over it. Just mentioning someone's name or stating the facts that they were present does not mean it's a promotion of the person. Grow up and stop being so petty.
6:00 step away from the computer and get some fresh air.
I'm disappointed in Kate.
I have no problem admitting that WDW Kate is the best Jake fan in the world and that she runs fantastic fan blog. But I'm still disappointed in her about the way she handled reeking. Yes, I know, that is only my problem.
JJ pics - Austin is pressing his groin on Sophia's butt. He sure does a better job to look authentic than Jake did with Reese. lol
she promoted reeke
For all of you saying this, please post links of WDW posts where Kate says Reeke is real, Jake is straight, she hopes they get married and have beautiful babies together. Go ahead, I'm waiting.
"But I'm still disappointed in her about the way she handled reeking. Yes, I know, that is only my problem."
you expected her to say the relation was fake ? the girl believe what jake says and does! for her he is straight.
What did you expect?
What did you expect
Nothing. I just hoped that she wouldn't love Reeke so much.
6:25 please post links where WDW says she loves Reeke.
"WDW posts where Kate says Reeke is real, Jake is straight, she hopes they get married and have beautiful babies together."
There was nothing ironic in her reeke post or mean. I think it would have been otherwise if she really believed it was fake. but I agree there was no much enthousiasm either.
For all of you saying this, please post links of WDW posts where Kate says Reeke is real, Jake is straight, she hopes they get married and have beautiful babies together.
Kate treated Reeke like a real couple and that implies that Jake is straight.
That was more than enough, in fact that was "worse" than GB fangirl crap about marriages and pregnancies.
I would like to add , I think kate is tolerant and don't care if jake is gay, bi or straight but I remember a long time ago she said in one of her comments she trust him more than any gossip which I don't contest since it's her opinion,just that explain her choice.
6:25 please post links where WDW says she loves Reeke.
That is implied in every WDW Reeke post, go to WDW and read all 500 of them.
"Kate treated Reeke like a real couple and that implies that Jake is straight.
That was more than enough, in fact that was "worse" than GB fangirl crap about marriages and pregnancies."
you react like fangirl who can't stand WFT cause we dare to say jake is gay.
Kate knows so much about Jake. I believe Kate knows that Reeke was 100% fake. If casual fans could see the fakeness, then Kate knew for sure.
JJ pics - Austin is pressing his groin on Sophia's butt.
I think Sophia is pressing her butt on Austin's groin. Austin should try to look more pleased about it. lol
Guys relax, all fans of Jake no matter if they think he's gay, straight, bi came here to let out their real feelings about Reeke. In some of his other fansites, the hosts probably wanted to avoid fights and played nice. There are sites like GB who supported Reeke and others like WDW who (imo) tolerated them. WFT2 was the place to go to talk about fans' real opinions about Reeke when they were on. Isn't it neat that we have a place like WFT2? Think about it, if all the other sites were as open and honest, we wouldn't have the pole position that we have now! ;)
5:17: How can the rings match? Jake is wearing a pinky ring that sas Carpe Diem, it's very visible even in small pics, I looked at the ring on JJ, I don't have to blow it up to see that it doesn't have any writing on it, it's just a plain gold ring.
Hear, hear 6:54pm. WFT is great, although I still think that management is overly sensitive to any criticism of Heath. There should be no censureship here if the poster is civilized.
Hear, hear 6:54pm. WFT is great, although I still think that management is overly sensitive to any criticism of Heath. There should be no censureship here if the poster is civilized.
I think Jake and Heath have many mutual fans, because of the movie and his passing hit the fans hard. But with time, I think, fans will be less touchy to criticism, if it's not unnecessary dissing or cruelty.
What does Heath have to do with anything, 7:00 PM? WFT2 is a Jake blog. Heath is dead and was just another one of Jake's costar. I don’t see posters spending time criticizing or praising Tobey Maguire for instance so why should Heath be any different. Time to move on.
I think Jake and Heath have many mutual fans,
LOL, yeah right!
7:08 PM - I think the difference is that because of BBM they have many mutual fans. You can't compare him to Tobey.
You should see some of the nutty revisionism on DC/Eyelashes, which shrunk drastically after Reeke started. It's a scream.
Haven't been there in an age - I went over and scrolled just a few pages back, pretty boring stuff, except for this comment which shows the babblers' (who like to pretend they never say anything negative about anyone) true colors. Re the black/white NY times photo of Tobey and Jake:
Lovely picture of Jake and Tobey.
Although if I were Tobey I would try not to be photographed with Jake.
Just saying.
Sheesh. Okay, we all know Jake is gorgeous, but why diss Tobey? What did he ever do? I actually thought it was a good picture of him, anyway.
To some people Heath will never be just one of Jake's costars. Don't tell other people how they should feel.
LOL, yeah right!
I think it's a Kate/Leo situation who have many mutual fans too because of Titanic. You can disagree if you want. :)
Anonymous said...
JJ pics - Austin is pressing his groin on Sophia's butt.
I think Sophia is pressing her butt on Austin's groin. Austin should try to look more pleased about it. lol
Spot on Anon
You know what's funny, it’s more likely Jake and Tobey are closer friends that Jake and Heath ever were but people love to delude themselves, eh?
I mean some people, obviously.
You know what's funny, it’s more likely Jake and Tobey are closer friends that Jake and Heath ever were but people love to delude themselves, eh?
Dude, even if you are right, so what? For some it doesn't matter if Jake and Heath were friends or not. BBM fans will always love the movie and like both actors, friends or no friends.
it’s more likely Jake and Tobey are closer friends that Jake and Heath ever were
Just because you say so?
Heath was "just another one of Jake's co-stars?" No way. Never. I'll never move on, Heath will always be in my heart.
Sheesh. Okay, we all know Jake is gorgeous, but why diss Tobey? What did he ever do? I actually thought it was a good picture of him, anyway.
I thought both of them look good too. :)
How can Austin make a movie like "Prayers for Bobby" and allowed those pictures to be taken? I just dont understand that.
If Austin is str8 why does he visit OMG and
WFT2 almost everyday? Yeah he does. Trust me on that one.
Why wasn't Natalie pictured with Jake and Tobey? Wasn't she invited or didn't she have time?
I thought Tobey looked hawt. He's an attractive actor I think. Of course Jake is gorgeous.
If Austin is str8 why does he visit OMG and
WFT2 almost everyday? Yeah he does. Trust me on that one.
I doubt that very much!
If Austin is str8 why does he visit OMG and WFT2 almost everyday? Yeah he does. Trust me on that one.
Hi Austin! :)
I'll never move on, Heath will always be in my heart
I feel the same.
5:17: How can the rings match? Jake is wearing a pinky ring that sas Carpe Diem, it's very visible even in small pics, I looked at the ring on JJ, I don't have to blow it up to see that it doesn't have any writing on it, it's just a plain gold ring.
Right now Jake and Austin are wearing gold pinky rings. Why?
Jake/Heath will always be a touchy subject. Figures. But you all know, deep down, if you’re being completely honest, that Jake and Heath’s so called friendship was PR-fabricated. I think it’s funny and terribly sweet how some of you try to cling to your "beliefs", no matter what. Awwwww.
Just the opposite. You all know, deep down, that Jake and Heath’s friendship was very special.
LOL, no.
Right now Jake and Austin are wearing gold pinky rings. Why?
That's a good question. Maybe it's a coincidence or it really means something.
LOL, no.
Let's agree to disagree then. ;)
At least you admit they aren't matching 7:32 as the poster aboved lied, you can see that they are different.
Now if that's the same Carpe Diem ring from 5 years ago that he used to wear from his Mom, then it has nothing to do with the ring Austin wore on Friday IMO, just a coincidence unless he bought the plain ring back in 2005 and just doesn't wear all the time.
A ring has to match to mean something IMO and they usually aren't pinky rings.
Special posted pictures of Austing doing a photoshoot and wearing a pinky ring. Aside that, did Austin wear a pinky ring ever before?
7:28 PM, do you remember the story from that journalist who was at the DGAs? The story was posted here some time ago. When Heath held his speech he teard up and Jake teared up too. Really, do you tear up with a random co-star? IDK.
I don't want to prove anything, but when I read stuff like that, I'm like... IDK. Sigh. LOL. ;)
A ring has to match to mean something IMO
I think the same.
Or Austin is a copy cat and saw that a pinky ring looks good on Jake and thought maybe it'll look good on me too?
Jared Eng REALLY likes Sophia and Austin :)
#40 Just Jared @ 02/23/2010 at 7:41 pm
We’re completely aware that the same few are making inappropriate comments over and over again while using different usernames. If you don’t have anything polite to say, then don’t bother saying anything at all. This kind of behavior is immature and will not be tolerated.
Sophia Bush & Austin Nichols: Black Eyed Peas Concert!
We know nothing of the sort, Anon. 7:28.
7:30, actually I think they were closer than what we think and they did see each other but behind closed doors. Maybe they didn't want anyone to think they were reliving BBM.
Jack, why don't you go out and play in the traffic for a little while. There's a good boy.
8:06 PM # 2 - very possible. I guess we won't find out anytime soon or ever.
Marc Malkin, E! Online
Sophia Bush & Austin Nichols' Fergalicious Night Out
8:07: What's the matter? The lie didn't fly???
Supposedly Matt Damon and Jake Gyllenhaal turned down the lead role for Avatar. Jake has a reason. I wonder what Matt's is,
about 2 hours ago
http://twitter.com/AttitudeAJM
kara_is_lovex: Jake Gyllenhaal is one of the hottest guys ever. He is not gay, do not even joke about that. Haha:)
about 4 hours ago
There was no writing on the ring Jake was wearing in the picture with Peter. Funny how those pictures never showed up anywhere "official". I think it has a lot to do with the ring.
Having been caught, Jake switched to the other ring so people would think that was what he's been wearing all along.
Jake gyllenhaal sitting at the bar with me and Bella in Montreal (Skye says I can't say which restaurant)
6 minutes ago
http://twitter.com/ebfmark
Funny how those pictures never showed up anywhere "official".
Only one picture used by People, and no permission for IHJ gallery. Strange.
ebfmark: Jake gyllenhaal sitting at the bar with me and Bella in Montreal (Skye says I can't say which restaurant)
25 minutes ago
IHJ doesn'town the pics, they bought them from the agency.
People bought the one pic from the agency and the ring is in clear view, so no one was trying to hide it.
Looking at that ring as i noticed before, it appears flat, fitted and seems to have some kind of design on it, but not the writing.
It almost looks like a stone is miising from it, it's hard to make out becasue the sunlight on the gold band is washing out the image but it doesn't look like a plain band.
oops so I'm a little bit late lol
Looks like a plain band to me. Why would Jake all of a sudden start wearing a ring with a missing stone. That makes no sense.
That is implied
Can't find any links, 6:31/6:39 can you. I asked for links, i.e. proof, not your assumption a la "implied."
Kate knows so much about Jake. I believe Kate knows that Reeke was 100% fake. If casual fans could see the fakeness, then Kate knew for sure.
Exactly. Anyone ever notice how Kate never replied to comments about Reeke, pro or con? If a poster said "I love the sweater Jake's wearing! He and Reese are [cute together/so fake]!" WDW would reply something like "Yes isn't that sweater the greatest!" ~ leaving the Reeke comment alone. Funny how some of the posters here seem to assume that not vehemently being vocal against something means you're automatically for it. Just because someone doesn't draw a line in the sand doesn't mean they are the opposition.
"There was no writing on the ring Jake was wearing in the picture with Peter. Funny how those pictures never showed up anywhere "official". I think it has a lot to do with the ring.
Having been caught, Jake switched to the other ring so people would think that was what he's been wearing all along."
ITA. What was so special about those pics that they were snatched up but never used? Couldn't be the subjects: everyone knows Peter is his bil, there was no extreme emotion going on (fighting, crying), and if anything Jake was reticent in his hug (keeping one hand on the car) and not overly affectionate. Nothing important was shown in the cars or background. Unless Peter is Grey Goose, it had to be something unusual or out of place, like Jake wearing the ring. And that ring was not any of the old ones he wore before (it's pathetic that I know this), it was a newer one for sure.
Jake gyllenhaal sitting at the bar
LOL vegetarian restaurants, yoga, veganism, "raw food"...and then he goes to bars and drinks.
I felt so bad/LOL about Atticus when he was taken for a pr photo op walk by the beard. On one hand he looked glad to be out but on the other hand he looked like "What the fuckery is this?" then he look resigned and wanted to go back home asap.
Does anyone know how long filmng will be in Montreal?
There is much more evidence that Jake and Tobey are chums than there is evidence that Jake and Heath were chums. The fact that Jake is Matilda's godfather means nothing, Jake and Tobey have been seen together for years at all sorts of functions, Tobey (unlike Heath, who wanted to shed all gay rumors post-BBM) has never had any reason to not be seen with Jake.
Whatever Jake said about their 'close friendship' meant nothing in the long run. Jake says lots of stupid things when he's trying to be polite.
Don't we all?!
Dear Know-It-All:
Love how some folks, from the comfort of their anonymous computers, tell other folks how easy it is to jump off that cliff.
Remember? Jake is afraid of heights and had to have a stunt double to jump off the cliff in BBM.
Most of the comments today are from someone talking to himself. Trying to agitate and drive others away. That always happens when Ted is about to leak a juicy tidbit.
Is it my imagination or is the text of the eonline blurb and Just Jared about Sophia and Austin identical. Clearly written by PR.
There is much more evidence that Jake and Tobey are chums than there is evidence that Jake and Heath were chums.
There is no such evidence. Plus things Jake says are irrelevant? Shows how much respect you have for him.
Most of the comments today are from someone talking to himself. Trying to agitate and drive others away. That always happens when Ted is about to leak a juicy tidbit.
Bullshit. Babblers, PR and the JIS crowd don't know anything more about what Ted is going to say than we do. Fact is, Ted always has a "juicy tidbit" ~ and the Babblers and JIS trolls are always here ~ and there's always discussions and heated arguments going on at this blog more often than not.
Most of the comments today are from someone talking to himself.
I posted today. So did many others. Very often our comments posted at the same time. Maybe you can't accept that more than 2 or 3 WFT people post here. Just because we are JIG/TT believers doesn't mean we have to agree on everything and can't have discussions (or even fights!) about the finer points of JIG/TT. Again, our fights/discussions - even with the trolls and Babblers - have no connection to what Ted's going to say.
Whatever Jake said about their 'close friendship' meant nothing in the long run.
Jake is still friends with Matthew Katz-Frost, in contact with Mike White and David from Austin, TX. But there is no way he could be friends with Heath.
11:36 PM, finally someone who uses their brain and cuts the sentimental crap. ITA!
Jake Matilda’s godfather = Heath’s prior refusal to pose with Jake at the Oscar luncheon + his Clooney pick for supporting actor, in other words PR damage control
Jake’s 'close friendship' comments = Jake said what he knew everyone wanted to hear, call it PR if you will
Sorry to burst your bubble, folks.
7:10, watch the Candy press conference. Heath was asked if he thought Clooney deserved Oscar for Syriana, Heath said yes. Later he apologized and said he didn't even think about who was in his category. I believe him. Heath was not evil. He was a nice guy, hated competition. As for not wanting to pose at the luncheon, Heath was moody and difficult sometimes. I think Jake knew him well and wasn't offended.
^^Or maybe the luncheon report isn't even true anyway.
Sorry to burst your bubble, folks.
What bubble?
You can't read anyone's mind and you can only speculate, like the rest of us.
The truth is Jake will probably never say anything about Heath anymore and IF he visits Matilda he does it seldom and behind closed doors. Heath chapter is closed for him and his fans, it's just fans of their movie who will stay nostalgic for a long time.
Let people believe what they want.
I wonder if Jake stayed in touch with Anne after shooting LAOD?
Possibly. Her parents live in Brooklyn, right?
Possibly. Her parents live in Brooklyn, right?
They live in N.Y. They used to live in Brooklyn, I'm not sure if they still live there.
The truth is Jake will probably never say anything about Heath anymore and IF he visits Matilda he does it seldom and behind closed doors.
That's just your opinion. BTW, what's wrong with private visits?
I agree about one thing though, if the friendship with Heath and Michelle meant hiding for Jake and not being open about it, what kind of friendship is that? I think they made him a disservice choosing him as godfather. I think Jake made a mistake being glued to H & M during BBM promotional work, he should have been more in Anne's company, who really liked him, but was left out. I like Heath and am a big fan of him as an actor, but he was also a troubled guy (and Michelle is plain weird), Jake should have let him and Michelle alone and mind his own business. Maybe the friendship wasn't good for Jake and now he wants to move on from it and maybe we shouldn't judge him. He'll hopefully have a good career, he has a supportive family and many good friends like Chris, David, Austin, RDJ, Matt, Lance, Natalie... There's no need to surround himself with people that aren't good for him.
That's just your opinion. BTW, what's wrong with private visits?
It's just a strange thing to always hide. Why so secretive? I've no idea if it's his decision to be so secretive or rather (and that's what I believe) "strange Michelle's" decision? Everyone knows he's her godfather (real, symbolic, celeb whateves). What's the problem?
I wonder if Jake stayed in touch with Anne after shooting LAOD?
Possibly.
It will be fun seeing them doing promo together again. LAOD sounds really good, let's hope it'll be well received. :)
No worries, 8:17 AM. Jake most likely didn’t spend much time in Heath’s company when it wasn’t required. I doubt Heath wanted him around anyway, he had more than enough of his own friends.
I thought Anne's family moved to NJ?
There were reports that Jake and Anne were seen in different clubs together during shooting in Pittsburgh. :)
I thought Anne's family moved to NJ?
Oh right! Anne was born in NYC (Brooklyn?) but they moved to NJ later.
There were reports that Jake and Anne were seen in different clubs together during shooting in Pittsburgh.
Where? ONTD?
Where? ONTD?
Yes. The link to the post was posted on WFT 2.
There's no need to surround himself with people that aren't good for him.
What are you saying? That Michelle and Matilda wouldn't be "good for him?" In what way would they be "bad" for him other than your opinion that Michelle is "weird"? This whole idea that Jake is pure as the driven snow and that he shouldn't have "tainted" himself by being around Heath sounds like something straight from the babbler handbook - especially the pretense of "I like Heath, but..."
Yes. The link to the post was posted on WFT 2.
Thanks, no idea how I missed that.
Heath’s prior refusal to pose with Jake at the Oscar luncheon
There's no way to know if that's true. But there are pics of Jake and Michelle at the Oscar luncheon.
backstage
8:17 pm, RDJ???? The only difference between RDJ and Heath is that RDJ was lucky--Heath was not.
if the friendship with Heath and Michelle meant hiding for Jake and not being open about it, what kind of friendship is that?
A valuable friendship. Heath liked the privacy and I'm sure Jake didn't have a problem with that.
happy for Jake
we <3 Heath
It's just a strange thing to always hide. Why so secretive?
Not strange at all. Matilda doesn't need more paparazzi photos nor public attention in public places.
This whole idea that Jake is pure as the driven snow and that he shouldn't have "tainted" himself by being around Heath sounds like something straight from the babbler handbook - especially the pretense of "I like Heath, but..."
Ding, ding, ding, we have a winner!
happy for Jake
we <3 Heath
Awwww :)
Jake is wearing pinky ring in both pics?
Jake is wearing pinky ring in both pics?
Obviously he does.
Three more memory lane pics and then I have to leave:
pic 1
pic 2
pic3
Dear Ted:
I'm not so sure about Robsten anymore. I want to believe but there was no love at the last award show. Maybe they are just good friends. If they have that much clout, why is Summit telling them to cool it? I would never see the last Twilight film if Summit even considered recasting the two! Let's face it, Ted, I just don't think they're together—it's just a really big PR stunt to have people see their movies! I'm sad. But thanks for trying to convince us they are real. Keep trying!
—LJM
Dear Debbie Doubtful:
The problem with that theory is that it doesn't make any sense. If Robsten was a PR hoax, the sneaky duo would be staging photo ops left and right. Have you learned nothing from Gyllenspoon?
Dear Ted:
I guess many of us think we know the identities of Toothy Tile and Grey Goose, but I was wondering if there were any other Hollywood pairs like them out there—i.e. both dudes (or girls) are in the public eye? Also, I know fans sometimes like to imagine that people are together, like in the case of Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto in Star Trek, but are there any current colleagues who are or were more than friends and would America be shocked by it?
—Daisy
Dear Close and Closeted:
Am I reading this right—are you honestly asking if there are other closeted gay couples in Hollywood? Duh. And gay couples have on-set hookups just like their super-horny straight costars. Think about that next time you're at the movies.
Dear Ted:
Hey boy, with all this love your precious Twi-hards and Jackles peeps are getting from your intense love of those pairings, you never talk about your Blind Vices anymore. So do me a fave and answer a couple of questions on a couple of older Vices: Does Grey Goose mostly work in television and how does he keep their forbidden love child from the paps when celebrities can't walk out the door without being stalked? And how's Dashed Dingle-Dream's relationship with his own beard going now that Judas has cut him off for good?
—Blondie
Dear Of Vice and Men:
It's not hard for celebs to keep their private lives out of the press if they really want them to remain a secret—à la Baby Tile. Publicity is a nasty little game and stars are usually willing to air their own dirty laundry—although seemingly against their will—to stay in the spot light. And DDD and his beard have the same relaysh as all bearding situations: unsatisfying.
Dear Ted:
I love the Vampire Diaries. Anything going on with Nina Dobrev & Paul Wesley or Nina and Ian Somerhalder?
—Kaylee
Dear Dear Diary:
If you're young and hot and have a show on the CW, you're basically required to—at least appear—to date your costar. Call it the "Gossip Girl Precedent," it keeps the buzz going for the usually ratings challenged shows.
Dear Ted:
Is Baby Tile human, feline, canine or equine?
—J
Dear Smarty Pants:
Come to think of it, I didn't say kitty, puppy, or pony—did I?
Bitch-Back!
IHJ doesn'town the pics, they bought them from the agency. People bought the one pic from the agency and the ring is in clear view, so no one was trying to hide it.
People magazine can post the picture on the Internet. IHJ bought the pics but can't post them in the gallery. That doesn't make sense.
Is Baby Tile human, feline, canine or equine?
Ha?
For some reason that particular phot agency has a problem with fan sites like IHJ posting pics, just a prejudice I guess.
They have no problem with a non-fan site like People.
Ted said: "If you're young and hot and have a show on the CW, you're basically required to—at least appear—to date your costar. Call it the "Gossip Girl Precedent," it keeps the buzz going for the usually ratings challenged shows."
the CW and One Tree Hill publicity = Austin and Sophia bearding.
Can't find any links, 6:31/6:39 can you. I asked for links, i.e. proof, not your assumption a la "implied."
Here is your WDW link. Read posts from October 21, 2007 to November 29, 2009, you will find at least hundred posts about a great "couple" and straight Jake.
For some reason that particular phot agency has a problem with fan sites like IHJ posting pics, just a prejudice I guess.
Sorry, if you buy pictures for the Web site, then you have the right to post them on the Internet.
SLICEmag: Okay, Gylenhall (or however you spell his last name) has made up for it #ilovetearawaypants
about 16 hours ago
Does anyone know how long filmng will be in Montreal?
We don't know. They will also film at the Ottawa train station: "a production crew totalling more than 150 people may come to the city for at least four days of shooting in late March".
Three more memory lane pics and then I have to leave:
pic 1
pic 2
pic3
Thanks :)
#40 Just Jared @ 02/23/2010 at 7:41 pm
We’re completely aware that the same few are making inappropriate comments over and over again while using different usernames. If you don’t have anything polite to say, then don’t bother saying anything at all. This kind of behavior is immature and will not be tolerated.
Jared deleted at least 8 comments about Austin and Sophia:
#32 Just Jared @ 02/23/2010 at 7:41 pm
We’re completely aware ...
Sophia Bush & Austin Nichols: Black Eyed Peas Concert!
Here is your WDW link. Read posts from October 21, 2007 to November 29, 2009, you will find at least hundred posts about a great "couple" and straight Jake.
LOL. Read two years of WDW and I'm supposed to find it?! No honey. When I asked for links it meant specific examples, not the link to the WDW main page. You're not only a bullshitter but you're a lousy bullshitter at that.
Post a Comment