Wednesday, 24 June 2009
I Dish, Therefore I Am
On March 10, 2005, gossip columnist Ted Casablanca ran an item online under the heading "One Adorable Blind Vice".
The story was similar to numerous blind items Casablanca has run since bringing his column, "The Awful Truth," to E! Online in 1996. He relates a potentially scandalous story, usually with the kinds of revelations a major media gossip columnist would avoid, but disguises the object of his gossip behind a fanciful name like Morgan Mayhem, Furrowed Frank or Toothy Tile.
The ongoing saga of Toothy Tile says a good deal about Internet gossip, its place within the gay community and its function as a moral compass. It also points to some interesting intersections of gossip and gendered performance.
Hollywood gossip, of course, was around long before the Internet. Usually dated from the start of Louella Parsons' syndicated column in 1925, the field has traditionally been female-dominated, with Parsons and her chief rival, Hedda Hopper, engaged in an often-uneasy power struggle with the movie industry. The film studios used them to promote their films and personalities but also dreaded the effect of a personal attack or untimely revelation. One unwritten rule, however, was that the most damaging items — criminal arrests, long-term affairs and homosexuality — were not for publication in any but the least reputable venues. Parsons, Hopper and most of Hollywood may have known that Ramon Novarro was gay, but they weren't about to publish the fact. And if a writer broke the rules — as Bill Robinson did when he wrote about Spencer Tracy's drinking problems and his relationship with Katharine Hepburn in a 1962 issue of Look — the offender was cut off from industry sources.
Even with the decline of the studio system, some restrictions still hold. Unless a star's drug use is impossible for the media to ignore, it's kept out of the gossip columns. And "outing" is still considered off-limits, at least to columnists working in the major media.
For the gay on-line community, gossip serves a variety of purposes. If nothing else, it provides its readers with a sense of titillation as they vicariously enjoy celebrities' lives, even when the object of interest is masked behind the veil of the blind item. Like many on-line discussion boards, gay gossip sites provide their geographically dispersed users with a sense of community.
One element unifying gossip communities is a shared sense of morality. Gay gossip unites the gay and lesbian community by establishing behavioral norms for that community, creating insiders aware of those norms and outsiders unaware of or opposed to them.
In the case of Toothy Tile, the nature of those norms depends on whether one is inside or outside the gay community. Within the world of heteronormativity, Toothy Tile is at fault both for being gay and, more important, for wishing to make a public proclamation of that fact.
Despite the social changes of the past 50 years, the entertainment industry appears to be dealing with sexual orientation by the same standards in operation when Universal Pictures forced Rock Hudson to take a wife to forestall suspicions of homosexuality. The current attitude is described quite simply in one publicity-shy, or rather gay-publicity shy actor's legal complaint against a porn star who had claimed a relationship with him: "While plaintiff believes in the rights of others to follow their own sexual preference, vast numbers of the public throughout the world do not share his view and, believing that he had a homosexual affair and did so during his marriage, they will be less inclined to patronize [his] films, particularly since he tends to play parts calling for heterosexual romance and action adventure. " No doubt, these are the same audiences who would expect the actor to know how to pilot a jet fighter in real life.
Who, then, is thought to be the perpetually closeted Toothy Tile? Consensus gives the honor to Jake Gyllenhaal.
So, what team is Jake playing for? How many beards do you see in this picture? And...well, do I really have to say anything.
Source: I Dish, Therefore I Am: Performing Toothy Tile and Ted Casablanca by Frank Miller, Georgia State University
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1,891 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 1601 – 1800 of 1891 Newer› Newest»5:58 PM
What do you mean by stealth?
So, has anybody seen the trailer of Brothers?? I can't watch it on my computer at work :(
I don't think it's online yet.
Check out the previous pic, it was a bird sign he was going to see Jake next.
stealth:
the act or action of proceeding furtively, secretly, or imperceptibly
the state of being furtive or unobtrusive
6:02 did you always have others do your homework?
Thanks 6:08 PM, but I don't get what's stealth about buying coffee(?).
"stealth"
See the pic angle, how it's so low? The guy was either holding the cellphone camera by his side or crouched down "looking for something on a shelf" when he took it, LMAO. We need more people like him!
6:11 "stealth" is the pic taker, not Jake. Why it's called "stealth twitter" it wasn't called "stealth Jake"
OK, thanks 6:08 PM, 6:12 PM and 6:14 PM.
We need more people like him!
We do?
I have never understood fascination with taking celebrity pictures. I understand paparazzi, but have no desire to take pictures of some celebrity, not even Jake (but I would love to talk with him).
"Heath didn't fake anything, he didn't seek attention before, during or after BBMt promotion time."
If this is not comparison, excusez moi, Im kinda testy.
"boring as fuck"
Yes, fuck is boring butt
but never dull!
Now let's not be unfair, Heath was not perfect, but he wasn't a famewhore. Anne Hathaway said, Heath was a very generous guy. He gladly left the attention to others.
Where do you see comparison, 6:32 PM? Comparison with whom?
6:28 yes we need more people like him, twitters/bloggers who have sightings of Jake (and possibly Austin/kids in the car/BT) and takes a pic to prove it.
6:37 PM, I think some posters are paranoid.
"Now let's not be unfair, Heath was not perfect, but he wasn't a famewhore. Anne Hathaway said, Heath was a very generous guy. He gladly left the attention to others"
Yeah this is comparison, bitches. dont come to this site and spout this shit.
Yeah this is comparison, bitches. dont come to this site and spout this shit.
Sorry, but you are paranoid.
"Yeah this is comparison, bitches. dont come to this site and spout this shit."
ITA. Im so sick of sanctimonious Heath spouters. Sorry, Jackie, but why don't you create a home for these folks?
A real sighting/pic of Jake and the convo goes on about Heath/Michelle/Anne. Is there only 2 commenters here? Don't say you don't care about a pic of Jake in Venice, which is very interesting IMO, the 2nd sighting of him there this week, makes me wonder if he lives in that area now, and that he bores you because if it was a sighting without pics then multitudes of comments would follow arguing if it was real or not or why would he be in Venice, etc. Here you get what you want, a pic, and its like "oh whatever", and that's if you even bother to acknowledge it, LOL.
6:41 PM
I think you need some rest, I recommend nice GB blog.
"dont come to this site and spout this shit.
July 02, 2009 6:41 PM "
Every time somebody writes like that, I recall that woman from DCF called Melissa or something like that. Perhaps it's her.
Don't say you don't care about a pic of Jake in Venice, which is very interesting IMO
There are thousands of Jake in Venice pictures over the last 4-5 years.
Jake shaved.
What else is interesting, what am I missing?
Jake isn't a boy, he's a grown man.
The sooner what's left of his fandom realizes this, the better.
No one owns anyone and he isn't "yours/ours", slavery was abolished remember. Grow-up isn't it time, most of youare middle-aged already, geez.
6:41 PM, 6:45 PM - Jealousy and paranoia is a bad thing.
Jake was spotted in Venice the other day with Reese and the kids, there are tons of pics of Jake in Venice on IHJ. Venice, S. Monica, Brentwood, WEHO just like the rest of the celebs that live in the L.A. area, ZZZzzzzzzzzzzz.
No one owns anyone and he isn't "yours/ours", slavery was abolished remember.
Trolly,
what the fuck are you babbling about?
"I saw the trailer in the theater today and it kept going on and on and on and on and on giving away every possible thing of interest and spoiling every major plot development that may happen in the film.
Why the HELL do they do that?
As a result, I have no interest in seeing the film itself. I already feel as if I've seen it."
ITA with the IMDB poster! Its like why bother, I saw it for free and in less than 5 minutes!
Tell us more.
"what the fuck are you babbling about?"
this:
And if Jake happens to be making a total ass out of himself right now, doesnt mean he's not still "our boy" (for some of us) and I, for one, resent the comparisons and find them totally inappropriate on this site.
For God's sake, your reading comprehension skills are nonexistent.
"Jake was spotted ......."
Oh okay. I guess no one cares about current stuff? I won't post links/pics of Jake sightings anymore then, sorry to take you away from your Heath discussion.
Oh okay. I guess no one cares about current stuff? I won't post links/pics of Jake sightings anymore then, sorry to take you away from your Heath discussion.
Please, please shut up.
Yes Jake is in Venice. He was spotted with Reese and the kids there, as someone already mentioned, a couple of days ago. So, tell me, how should I react to it?
7:06 PM
Thanks for posting the pic, it isn't your fault that picture isn't interesting.
Jake was spotted in Venice the other day with Reese and the kids
I don't buy such twitter "sightings".
Jake can be proud of some of his fans here. LOL.
I don't buy such twitter "sightings".
You buy none of the Reeke twitter sightings? I do think some are legit.
Which ones? How do you tell?
Which ones? How do you tell?
I can't tell which one are real, which are not. But there is no way all of the Reeke twitter sightings are fake. You must be delusional to think that.
I can't tell which one are real, which are not.
Exactly. Just keep that in mind.
Jake and Reese leaving Carnage in N.Y.
vid
^^^ From June 21, 2009
Jake can be proud of some of his fans here. LOL.
Like who?
This twitpic is from DC.
Reeke posing with fans
^^I guess Reeke read about some of the bad encounters where they acted crap with people who recognised them or fans. Now they show their nice site. ;)
Ewww, Reese is especially ugly in that pic.
ITA with the IMDB poster! Its like why bother, I saw it for free and in less than 5 minutes!
Hey, where are you?
Did you see the trailer, did you like it?
"Yes Jake is in Venice. He was spotted with Reese and the kids there"
Well for one thing this new sighting has a pic, what you all cry for, right? Boring, looking at a bag of coffee yes but it's pic, gawdammit!
Yes, we have a picture and that picture has nothing to do with previous Venice "sighting".
7:34, sorry i was agreeing with the "why bother seeing the movie" comment of the IMDB poster, when they show trailers that basically has all the movie in it (I didn't see Brothers trailer):
"ITA with the IMDB poster! Its like why bother, I saw it for free and in less than 5 minutes!"
OK, I see, thanks 7:38 PM.
Its amazing how many movies cut their own throats by trailer overkill.
Trailer overkill, giving away every possible thing of interest - how can marketing people be so stupid?
Hmm should I get the Tree-Saving Humane-Bird Green World's Peace and Love Sensual beans or the Factory-Produced Extra Caffeinated with Spanish Fly blend?
Extra Caffeinated with Spanish Fly blend.
You are going to need all Spanish Fly you can get!
Youse guys are fuckin' nutz
Nuckin Futz!
Whatever. . .
Those of us who want to discuss Heath will do so until we decide to go onto another topic, or the owner of this blog tells us not to do so. Just like with all of the other non-Jake specific topics that get brought to this board. The person who runs the blog decides its parameters.
If you don't like what being posted, then you post something of interest.
Simple really.
^^They don't seem to get the concept. ;)
"If you don't like what being posted, then you post something of interest.
Simple really."
Oh, I think we'll just keep saying how sick we are of your boring and endless drivel.
Simple really.
Simply witless.
That was for you 10:38 and all of the other boring, snivelling complainers.
Oh right I call you boring so you call me boring. And I call you driveling so you call me sniveling.
Come on, you can do better than that.
Oh well. If only Jake could manufacture movie roles as easily as he manufactures staged photo ops and planted rumors in the gossip rags. I guess that there really is some justice in the world.
"Brothers" trailer - did anyone see it?
IMDb - Brothers trailer discussion
www.brothersfilm.com
Those of us who want to discuss Heath will do so until we decide to go onto another topic, or the owner of this blog tells us not to do so. Just like with all of the other non-Jake specific topics that get brought to this board.
Yes, of course.
Complainers must be some kind of jokers - they aren't interested so other people shouldn't discuss it?! What kind of "argument" is that?
IMDb - Brothers trailer discussion
Mixed opinions, but not bad so far.
Page Six
KICKING THE CRITIC
ALICE HOFFMAN isn't the only author lashing out at a critic over a bad review. After reading a takedown of his "Pleasures and Sorrows of Work" in the New York Times Book Review, Alain de Botton lambasted critic Caleb Crain on Crain's personal blog, writing, "I will hate you till the day I die and wish you nothing but ill will in every career move you make." (De Botton later apologized for his outburst on Twitter, saying, "I am so sorry and ashamed of myself.") Earlier this week, Hoffman tweeted that Roberta Silman, who negatively reviewed her "The Story Sisters" in the Boston Globe, was a "moron" and an "idiot."
Neil Patrick Harris has gone from former child star, to awesomely reinvented actor, to part-time magician, to toast of the town, to TV Land Awards' host, to Tony Awards' host to Emmy Awards' host in such a short amount of time, you might think he's got some seriously salacious blackmail material stored in his vault.
But believing that would diminish the dedication and drive NPH has shown towards becoming a quintuple threat over the last five years. What am I trying to say? Mostly, congratulations to Neil Patrick on the news that he's just agreed to host the 2009 Emmy Awards on Sept. 20!
This is seriously good news after last year's multiple host monstrosity. And judging from his gig at the Tony Awards, Neil Patrick isn't going to go down Hugh Jackman's alley by giving us loads of lavish musical numbers -- his hosting style is more subdued, but just as smart. And it leaves the focus on the winners.
Personally, I'd be fine if NPH was tasked to host every awards show from here on out. Hear that Hugh, you better watch yo' ass!
NY Post Popwrap
"I will hate you till the day I die and wish you nothing but ill will in every career move you make."
And I thought I was bad! lol
"Brothers" movie stills
People magazine very delayed DC Reeke "sighting"
Posted Friday July 03, 2009
Caught in the Act!
Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal, cozying up while brunching at the Blue Duck Tavern inside the Washington, D.C.'s Park Hyatt. The couple ordered up the crab omelette, sausage and veggie side dishes – and also got their caffeine fix with a cappuccino and espresso. While Witherspoon was reading The New York Times at the table, she didn't neglect her boyfriend. "They were cute because they were holding hands a lot," a source says. Before leaving, the couple snapped pictures of the restaurant's open kitchen.
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20289073,00.html
"Jake can be proud of some of his fans here. LOL."
"Like who?"
Read some of the comments here, you wouldn't believe it's grown up men and women who write it, rather immature teenagers. It's embarrassing actually.
7:06 AM, thanks for posting. I believe if Reeke is a sham altogether, they are at least friends. He is Sagattarius, she Aries. They fit... in their case probably as friends.
"Brothers" movie stills
Thanks for posting the link to the pics. I hope the film will be as well received as the original film.
I believe if Reeke is a sham altogether, they are at least friends.
Reeke are more PR business partners than friends.
LOL friends
Read some of the comments here, you wouldn't believe it's grown up men and women who write it, rather immature teenagers.
Come on, don't be so hard on Jake's young and naive fans :)
Reeke are more PR business partners than friends.
LOL friends
Please you don't know the context of it. Maybe he was being a baby and exaggerated and she was annoyed. How many times did my dad annoy my mom when he thought evertime he had a cold he'd die.
Many men are babies. She was holding his caffee though. ;)
Come on, don't be so hard on Jake's young and naive fans :)
I wish they were young and naive, but they are probably over 30, 40 year old immature people that are too much emotionally invested in an actor. The level of obsession is scary sometimes.
7:27 AM
Give me a break and stop making up excuses for the bitch.
Complainers must be some kind of jokers - they aren't interested so other people shouldn't discuss it?! What kind of "argument" is that?
I get some are bored by some topics, but others are plain jealous and paranoid and that is alarming. That's a sign that you need to go out in the fresh air and interact with "real" people for a change and then realize that what is written on a little gossip blog is not important at all. Who cares? We share here our love for gossiping about "stars", more concrete stars who we think are in the closet.
I wish they were young and naive, but they are probably over 30, 40
If that's the case, they are ignorant and naive.
Anne was spotted rehearsing for SitP. She got great reviews for it.
GG
Anne is a real actress :)
Anne invited to the Academy:
Go Anne!
Anne invited to the Academy
And Michelle and Franco!
Anne/Jake
They look good together and had great chemistry in BBM. I think directors saw that, hence they casted them in another movie. I'm curious how it'll turn out.
Failure is not an option!
*Fuck! Anne will kick my ass until I'll look as straight as Chuck Norris!*
^^^ Watched it with the sound off, looks boring.
Bootleg "Brothers" trailer, posted by GB
P.S. That's link to YouTube
I think it's possible that Tobey will get an Oscar nod. I always thought he was a very good but underrated actor. He was excellent in "The Ice Storm," "Wonder Boys" and "Cider House Rules" but people only know him as Spiderman, which is a shame.
In a new interview with Details, Quincy Jones said Michael Jackson didn't accept his race. "It's ridiculous, man! Chemical peels and all of it. And I don't understand it. But he obviously didn't want to be black ... You see his kids?" said Quincy, who added that Bubbles the chimp once bit a hole in his daughter's hand.
10:41 AM, I agree. I also think Tobey is underrated.
GB posted it on Youtube and the blog.
It does look boring but agree that Tobey may get a nomination.
It does look boring but agree that Tobey may get a nomination.
Based on Tobey's 20 seconds in the trailer or something else?
...Tobey may get a nomination.
^^
I doubt it. It's a Jake' s movie.
If anyone is going to get a nom is going to be him.
For what people is commenting, I presume it's a film made it for Jake's boast, not Tobey's.
but we'll see...
For what people is commenting, I presume it's a film made it for Jake's boast, not Tobey's.
Just the opposite, check out IMDb.
Tobey's role seems more demanding and dramatic, his character is "meatier".
^^
Then I'll stop paying attention on people's comments ;))
No, you should post link to people's comments :)
ET - Brothers Trailer
^^^ Posted on OMG by Special K
Odd, If this is a remake of the original Danish version than Tobey has the meatier role, not Jake.
In Oscar speculation talk it's Tobey name that is mentioned, not Jake's. People are commenting on Tobey, not Jake.
Jake Gyllenhaal & Tobey Maguire: 'Brothers' in Arms
Tobey Maguire, Jake Gyllenhaal and Natalie Portman create a potent love triangle in the powerful drama 'Brothers,' in theaters this December, and we have a first look at the preview trailer!
'Brothers' stars Tobey and Jake as siblings Sam and Tommy, two polar opposites: Sam is a steadfast marine and family man about to embark on his fourth tour of duty. Tommy is a drifter just out of jail who gets by on his charm and wit.
When Sam's chopper is shot down in the mountains of Afghanistan and he's believed to be dead, Tommy turns over a new leaf by taking responsibility for Sam's wife, Grace (Portman), and children -- leading to an unexpected attraction. Later, Sam returns home after being captured and tortured by Taliban fighters, shifting the family dynamic into super uncomfortable territory…
Directed by Jim Sheridan ('My Left Foot,' 'In the Name of the Father,' 'In America'), Mare Winningham and Sam Shepard also star in 'Brothers.'
Whatchu want Natalie?
Here's the new trailer for Brothers, directed by Jim Sheridan (he did In America) and starring Natalie Portman, Jake Gyllenhaal and Tobey Maguire. The thing looks sappy until about halfway in and then it looks kind of cool, but I remember this movie when it was called Pearl Harbor.
ONTD comments
Odd, If this is a remake of the original Danish version than Tobey has the meatier role, not Jake.
Tobey has the meatier role, looks like that in the trailer, too.
Just watched the trailer. I think this could be good. Just by the nature of his arc, Tobey has the more dramatic role, but it will be interesting to see if Jake pulls off the quieter and less flashy role.
It will also be interesting to see how it compares to the original and if it will stand on its own.
Stupid question - why Jake's eyes look so big (bigger than usual) and a bit strange? Is it me?
American soldiers have fun conquering and massacrating nations and then come back home to act all sensitive about it and weep like lost babies.
Then, they film movies where it looks like they are the only ones suffering.
This is just MY opinion, i don't care or judge what other people might feel or think on the subject and I'm curious about Jake and Tobey's performances but i think i'll pass this shit for now
Tobey is lead in Brothers as is Natalie. Jake is supporting. Tobey and Natalie do have meatier roles than Jake and are getting some Oscar buzz. Both are considered long shots for Oscar noms as is Brothers for Best Pic. Jake has not gotten any buzz for his role. I think this will be a Zodiac type performance for Jake good but not great. Certainly better than Rendition.
I'll believe Oscar buzz AFTER I read at least one review :)
"I wish they were young and naive, but they are probably over 30, 40 year old immature people that are too much emotionally invested in an actor. The level of obsession is scary sometimes."
---------- ------------------ --
It's pretty much the same for all fandom. You probably notice it here more because here is like the last outpost of Jake fandom in a way, everywhere else is either closed or dwindled to virtually nothing.
But you could always keep away if it offends your intelligence. Why come back again and again if it's beneath you?
11:58 AM
Thanks for offending all posters. LOL!
Whatchu want Natalie?
LOL!
I'm not sure about Natalie getting an Oscar nod (I think she will have serious competition next year--ie. Meryl Streep, et. al) but MAYBE Tobey could get one. But again, the competition next year for Best Actor will also be intense. But I think he, of all the main actors, has the best shot. He looks really good here.
Who are other Best Actor potential competitors?
Leonardo DiCaprio – Shutter Island
Matt Damon – The Informant/Green Zone
Javier Bardem – Biutiful
Daniel Day-Lewis – Nine
Morgan Freeman – Untitled Nelson Mandela Project
I'll will be very surprised if Tobey gets nominated :)
I'm confident about Leo. Really looking forward to Shutter Island.
Did the trailer just show the whole movie?
I have a feeling that trailer didn't cover only last 5 minutes, everything else is there!
Am I the only one who thinks Jake looks a bit too earnest and cow-eyed in the trailer?
Fuck!
There must be some nicer way to ask questions about my eyes!
Did the trailer just show the whole movie?
I think it was the only way to make the movie look interesting.
Family dramas aren't very entertaining.
I didn't get the sense that the "ET" trailer showed the whole movie. We all know the jist of the story. The important thing is that we don't know the exact ending or the details of the journey these people make.
I think it's the journey that will tell the tale.
I think Daniel Day, Leo and Morgan are sure things. (I can't wait to see "Nine.")
Dramas are not for children.
My view: we have seen the journey (nothing special about it), all we need to find out is wife's choice - husband or husband's brother.
I think it's the journey that will tell the tale.
You are right, the journey is the point.
I just wonder if people will bother to watch the movie if they find out how the movie ends.
Did Sheridan change the ending from the dannish version? Anybody knows?
I don't think so - that IMDb guy saw the dannish version too and didn't mention different ending.
Am I the only one who thinks Jake looks a bit too earnest and cow-eyed in the trailer?
His eyes are big :)
I just wonder if people will bother to watch the movie if they find out how the movie ends.
Well...I knew how BBM ends before seeing it and it didn't generate me less of an impact. If the movie is good and is well told (like BBM is) then the viewing experience compensate knowing the ending,i think
Well...I knew how BBM ends before seeing it and it didn't generate me less of an impact. If the movie is good and is well told (like BBM is) then the viewing experience compensate knowing the ending,i think
I think the movie will be good (even if it's a copy of the original), but I wouldn't compare it to BBM. I don't think it's in the same league. I may be wrong though.
If the movie is good and is well told (like BBM is) then the viewing experience compensate knowing the ending,i think
Absolutely, I watched "Witness" 10 times.
I hope Tobey, Natalie and Jake will be praised for the performances because "Brothers" won't make money.
I've read the script and no, apparently Sheridan did not change the ending.
It is, actually, the ending that makes it an exceptional and moving story - and probably, more true to life.
I hope Tobey, Natalie and Jake will be praised for the performances because "Brothers" won't make money.
Natalie is overrated as an actress and she looks miscast. I have hopes for Tobey and Jake.
To keep peace, you know? Maybe you should refrain from mention it in future.
***
WTF??!!!
I will not do such thing.I was just saying that a good movie (like BBM FOR EXAMPE) is enjoyable despite knowing how it ends.
I don't care how "sensitive" some poster might get when BBM is mentioned, it is not my problem and I'm more than willing to gently discuss that subject.
What's next? Don't post about the ugliness of Reese's chin because it might offend poster with ugly features???
ugh, you know what,1:42 PM? You win, i'm out of here...
bye
>:(
Jake and Heath
You can't avoid destiny.
Coming soon to theatres...
Lionsgate International - The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus and Brothers
bye
LOL, yeah right!
I don't know who is offended by mentions of BBMt
Only trolls.
Natalie is overrated as an actress and she looks miscast.
Why miscast?
Why miscast?
She looks too young.
Much better than looking too old!
Happy Birthday, Tommy Cruise!
Tobey is lead in Brothers
You are right, Tobey got top billing.
Did the trailer just show the whole movie?
Trailer has too much info.
Dear Ted:
I'm in love with your column and the whole Robsten drama. I cannot wait for these two to "come out" already! I am a huge fan of Wentworth Miller. Got any juice on him? Pretty please!
—Jrondon2112
Dear Wentworth It?:
I've always thought the Prison Break cutie was a little boring, both in interviews and on the show. He needs a personality injection, stat. But of course, tons of hidden dirt on W.M. After all, the publicly dull are privately naughty.
Yay for the IoDP and Brothers, both distributed by Lionsgate! :*
Am I the only one who thinks Jake looks a bit too earnest and cow-eyed in the trailer?
Yes. Tobey seems to have that too, as in hundred mile stare. It makes them have a family resemblance. Nat looks fine in her role, to me. If she looks young, maybe the character became became pregnant young. Not farfetched.
It is, actually, the ending that makes it an exceptional and moving story - and probably, more true to life.
Oh, no! Incestual brothers and manage a' trois.
Tobey may have the more literal battle, but Tommy's had one too - whatever it was that landed him in prison, and being what appears to be a disappointment to his father probably did a number on his self-esteem. He seems to want to make a fresh start in life, and stepping up to do the right thing for his brother's family leads to more, then, it's all taken away again. And Sam's role has changed entirely for him. Going to be a gritty film.
^^I think it's going to be a good film. Departed was even better received than Infernal Affairs. I mean it got a BP Oscar. Maybe Brothers will have the same fate as Departed? I guess we'll see.
The first trailer for Jim Sheridan's "Brothers" starring Jake Gyllenhaal, Natalie Portman and Tobey Maguire has been unveiled and, true to it's Oscar-season release date, exhibits a emotionally powerful film set to draw the attention of the Academy.
In the film, Gyllenhaal plays the black sheep of a snowy Pennsylvania-based family whose bad behavior has left him in jail for three years while Maguire plays the military man older brother done good with Portman as his wife and the mother of their two daughters. When Maguire's character's tour of duty in Afghanistan goes awry and he is presumed killed in action, Gyllenhaal's character - who has just been released from prison - starts to encroach, seemingly to finally give back and support the family. Things are thrown into chaos, however, when Maguire unexpectedly returns.
We previously noted the strong Oscar pedigree of director Sheridan who is a six-time nominee; twice for Best Director, once for Best Picture and three times for Best Adapted or Original Screenplay; which will bode well for this project despite being scribed by David Benioff, recently of "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" infamy.
Further, the film is a remake of an award-winning 2004 Danish film by Susanna Bier, was previously set for an August release before being shifted to Oscar-season - evidence of studio confidence - and had reportedly tested strongly for its originally planned December 2008 release before post-production presumably delayed the release. All signs point to good things.
"Brothers" is due out December 4th and is also set to feature music written by U2 especially for it. The trailer features U2's "Bad" from the Unforgettable Fire in the second half and some terrible modern-rock fromage-rock song in the first half. Lighthouse? Everyone comes to us for these kinds of answers and we get that, but you can't pay us to listen to that kind of music.
The Playlist
We previously noted the strong Oscar pedigree of director Sheridan who is a six-time nominee; twice for Best Director, once for Best Picture and three times for Best Adapted or Original Screenplay;
I'm impressed. Jake's working with some good directors.
Music from The Unforgettable Fire. :( How appropos. Brothers seems to have been beautifully done and full of meaning.
Maguire relveals son's name.
People
Here are some pics of the new babyboy:
X17
New born???!!! That kid is HUGE!!
Cute baby,though.But i'm of the ones who always think babies are all beautiful ;)
Otis? What a stupid name.
I'm WAY cuter!
Otis...
:(
It sounds like otitis
well, as long is a healthy and happy kid...
:))
Otis Redding - I've Been Loving You Too Long (To Stop Now)
Awwww, congrats to Jennifer and Tobey! Otis Tobias and Ruby Sweetheart, cute names. :)
Ruby
Sweetheart????????
Please, tell me that is just a nickname....
It is tedious but I'm still interested in how things get placed in the entertainment media. For example a big Reekeing was avoided by Michael Jackson's untimely death.
I heard the cover of US was Kendra's Wedding and a "Hollywood Couples" theme for the entire mag with Jake and Reese's DC huggy, lovey dovey week in review as part of the "A List Couples" section "who's next". There was a couples lookback section potentially to tie into Farrah and Ryan's love story and her death which was going to have a more prominent layout, one article on her recent struggles and one retrospective of her relationship with Ryan O'Neal.
US Reekley still pimps the movie with a picture of Owen and Reese, mentions the ice cream shop in the sightings and in the TOC directs you to go to the website to read more about "Jake and Reese: Happy In Love: Matching outfits! Longing glances!"
LOL that tells me Nanci was pissed that they got bumped. Even funnier there is nothing up on the website yet. Janice Minn is going to have a bad day when this holiday weekend is over.
"Hollywood Couples" theme for the entire mag with Jake and Reese's DC huggy, lovey dovey week in review as part of the "A List Couples" section "who's next"
Not fair after all that matching fools and fake PDA photo op work! LOL!
Not fair after all that matching fools and fake PDA photo op work!
^^
Awww, no worries! Rags aren't going anywhere.
I bet Reeke's PR is making new arrangements to make it happen soon ;)
You can count on that!
We are waiting, baby! Bring it on!!
:DDD
Brothers seems to have been beautifully done and full of meaning.
Let's hope so! I love smart and meaningful movies.
just curious, which one is a smart & meaningful movie to you?
If Jake had put half as much effort into getting Brothers released last year as he's put into bearding, staging photo-ops and planting rumors over the past year, then maybe he would be taken more seriously by Oscar caliber directors like Lee, Eastwood or Fincher. As is stands now, it's going to be a long time before we see Oscar-buzz anywhere near Jake's name after Brothers comes out. A long time.
The closet door really does swings both ways in HW. Bearding with a manipulative, vindictive pr-hound like Reese will make you more attractive to certain studios (like Disney), but it is the kiss of death for other producers, actors and directors. Jake is very lucky that Anne Hathaway used her political capital to help an old friend. Most actresses of her caliber would not have done the same.
just curious, which one is a smart & meaningful movie to you?
Monty Python's Life of Brian :)
LOL, you have got to e kidding 6:12. Clown face Annie now has political capitol? In which universe? This movie sounds like some indie flick that will probably have a hard time getting distribution like Nailed.
Brothers is getting Oscar buzz because of the cast which includes Jake and Sheridan.
HW could care less about earding and who is bearding, all they cae about is $$$$
(((Anne)))
*Got to ask Anne if she knows any cute producers*
HW could care less about earding and who is bearding, all they cae about is $$$$
Hollywood cares about actor's image and charisma.
Rags are good, PR whoring works!
Yeah, right.
"HW could care less about bearding and who is bearding, all they care about is $$$$"
This is total bull*#$&.
Anyone who thinks that bearding does not translate into more ticket sales is nuts. And if you think that Jake, a man with persistent gay rumors, would have gotten PoP, a multimillion dollar franchise produced by one of the hetero-fascistic studios in Hollywood, without bearding, then you are completely insane.
For A-List male actors in HW, heterosexuality is like a bottom-less, cultural ATM machine, and bearding is one of the fastest ways to get cash.
HW could care less that Jake is bearding, half of HW is. If he isn't getting the offers he wants it's because he is asking for too much $$$, he isn't right for the part and there are better actors his age up for the same parts.
Jake is a good actor, not great and nothing extrodianry about him with the likes of Franco and Gosling and Gordon-Levitt around.
If he isn't getting the offers he wants it's because he is asking for too much $$$, he isn't right for the part and there are better actors his age up for the same parts.
Hollywood isn't THAT simple.
Once again, you just don't get it. If you think that Franco, Gosling and Levitt get juicy parts just because they are decent actors, you're crazy. They also get juicy parts because there are few, if any, gay rumors surrounding them!
And if you think that Heath got Batman just because he's a superb actor, then you are nuts. He ran away from Jake as fast as his scrawny legs could take him because he wanted to avoid gay rumors, and they were sticking to Jake like lint. There are plenty of male actors who could have played Joker. Talent was only part of the picture.
There are so many superb actors in Hollywood who don't warrant a glance from HW franchise makers, actors like Chad Allen, who could act Jake, Macguire, LaBoeuf, Gosling and Levitt under the table. Allen never gets a call from Disney. Why? Because he's openly gay. Period. Looks and talent have absolutely nothing - nothing - to do with it.
Do you honestly believe that Jake doesn't get good parts, or had to wait so long to get a franchise deal, just because there are more talented actors available? Do you think that Maguire got Spiderman because he's a brilliant actor? Are you nuts? Do you think that Haydn Christiansen got Star Wars because someone thought that he was going to be the new Sean Penn? Are you insane?
Gay rumors can destroy promising careers in Hollywood, and for A-list male actors who want a franchise, gay rumors can kill all hopes for a starring part.
Stop creating f^*king excuses for the homophobic HW machine. If you are a male actor who wants a franchise, you have to look straight. HW doesn't particularly care how you do it : knock up some woman, purchase a baby, do lots of sports and flex your muscles for the ladies, serially date lots of actresses, contractually arrange to beard, etc.
Take your pick : Jeffrey Katzenberg doesn't care. As long as you het up for the cameras. What did Reese say after her faux-date with Jake at the LA Coliseum? "We had to kiss"?
Looking heterosexual is not the only reason why male actors get franchise deals in HW, but without it, you won't even get a phone call.
Jake gets the hell on my nerves most of the time, but I know that he didn't create these rules. He had a choice : live with the rules and adapt, or completely give up hope of landing a franchise deal.
The choice he made is now obvious, but he's also living with the professional and emotional consequences. Just because Disney and the gossip rags have rewarded Jake for bearding doesn't mean that Fincher, Eastwood and Lee have to.
Stop Calling Yourself White IF You are a Gay Man
You give up being white socially if you are a gay man. Whites no longer consider you a fellow white man; you become a gay man, only.
Stop claiming what is not yours, and those who do not want you. Your privileged status leaves as soon as your sexual orientation status is known.
If Michael Jackson has any lesson at all to teach it is stop humiliating yourselves by claiming that which despises you and being consumed with self hatred.
You do realize that straight whites laugh hysterically at white gay men who try to appear superior when they demand only a white dick will do.
They actually laugh out loud.
There are gay rumores regarding Gosling, Franco and Levitt and hayden.
HW gossip has it that the president of Universal fucked Tobey and that's how he got Spiderman. As a result, Tobey got the franchhise and the head of Universal's daughter, Jennifer.
Not bad for Tobey a wife, 2 kids a franchise and the Tobey/Leo rumors died.
Must be icky for Jennifer though.
Jake is a mediocre actor with mommy issues and a bore,
Leo recommended Tobey for Spiderman *cough*
You give up being white socially if you are a gay man. Whites no longer consider you a fellow white man; you become a gay man, only.
Interesting view.
And if you think that Heath got Batman just because he's a superb actor, then you are nuts. He ran away from Jake as fast as his scrawny legs could take him because he wanted to avoid gay rumors, and they were sticking to Jake like lint. There are plenty of male actors who could have played Joker. Talent was only part of the picture.
LOL, bullshit.
If you are a male actor who wants a franchise, you have to look straight
"Here's a real story, with the details removed for privacy.
A few years back, while casting a tent pole action blockbuster, the studio in charge discovered that it's lead was a big 'mo. They went to him and said essentially, "Look, we need to know you aren't going to come out. We can get you dates with a girl for public appearances, but you can not possibly come out." He refused and was dropped from the project like a hot potato. Why haven't you heard this story? Because the actor in question wanted a career."
Hey 7:31 PM, before you spew your usual crap that Heath ran away from Jake and the gay to avoid homosexual rumors (even though there never were any about him), and to get a big part in a franchise, a part that anyone could've played and probably gotten an Oscar for it too (yeah, right), you might want to know that Nolan said Heath was the only choice for the Joker, when actors like Adrien Brody (Oscar winner), Robin Williams (Oscar winner), Paul Bettany, etc wanted the part.
Heath had many gay friends including Michael Stipe, Todd Haynes etc etc he had no problem appearing in public with. He shared a place with a gay couple for two years when he first started out in Hollywood. Is that what a homophobic man does, as well as take on two gay roles in such a short career? Really?
I guess facts are not important to you, you have your own little tune about Heath and his homophobic ass.
The fact that Heath was the actor Nolan wanted the most is irrelevant. What matters is that Nolan would not have wanted him at all if he were openly gay! If you think that Nolan would have handed the second most important part in an incredibly expensive, lucrative franchise film to an openly gay actor, or even one who had tons of persistent gay rumors sticking to him like lint, then you are completely insane. Absolutely nuts.
Heath was replaceable, the Batman franchise is not. Heath was a good actor, but Nolan would have found a way to make $500 million dollars without him. Mike Nolan could have wanted Chad Allen as much as babies want mother's milk, but the studio would not have approved it. If Nolan didn't like it, they'd fire him.
And are you seriously suggesting that Heath's willingness to appear with gay actors is the same as his willingness to spend time with an actor he just pretended to ass-fuck in front of the whole world? Did you see anyone suggesting that Heath was screwing Stipe or Haynes? Get a brain.
Once again, you're ducking and weaving around the fact that openly gay actors do not star in Hollywood franchises! You could have twenty academy awards. If you don't look straight and run away from *persistent* gay rumors in Hollywood, you don't get HW franchises. Period. Get used to it, and stop creating excuses for homophobia in HW.
And stop letting you Heath worship blind you to the fact that Heath followed the same rules to get Batman that Jake followed to get PoP : look straight, or we'll find somebody else for our $200 franchise flick.
These are also *facts*, and whether you like it or not, they aren't going anywhere.
I feel bad for Chad Allen but he can't act. He is really awful. Cringe worthy. But, there are plenty of no talents that get parts. NPH is multi-talented and seems to be a good person. He will always work and be famous and respected, but he would be a superstar if he people thought he was straight.
HW gossip has it that the president of Universal fucked Tobey and that's how he got Spiderman. As a result, Tobey got the franchhise and the head of Universal's daughter, Jennifer.
No, that isn't Hollywood gossip. That has never been Hollywood gossip. You just made that up. You know what gave it away? Two things: 1) I'm the person that posted a while back, talking about the relative positions of Jake, Zac, Robert Pattinson etc in Hollywood, and I do have some connections to the business, so I know what rumors were flying around then and that wasn't one of them. 2)Spider-Man is made by SONY Pictures, not Universal, you idiot. Now I dare you to come back and try to cover your mistake by saying that somehow Sony decided to give the lead role in their new franchise to Tobey because he fucked the head of a rival studio. Go ahead, please try it.
Ditto on the Chad Allen not being able to act.
And what about Quinto, widely believed to be gay, no beard, and in a huge franchise film.
Joseph Gordon Levitt and Ryan Gosling can act rings around most actors, are willing to take roles in very small films, gritty roles and are not concerned with being A-list.
Jake is an okay actor, limited range, and was unwilling to work hard and wanted to be a big star overnight. He was asking too much around her BBM, and took too long to sign onto another movie as a result. Wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't also being too picky.
Maybe the gay rumors didn't help, but imo Jake was already in trouble.
Quinto got the part because he is Nimoy's lovechild. He was very good in it and they gave him the girl, but he isn't Kirk (I thought Pine was the weekest link). I also think Star Trek is a lot different than most franchises. (It's smarter.)
I remember Jake once said that he was impressed by people who took time off and spent time with loved ones and family. I think he is picky and probably asked for to much money. I wish he went for some indie gritty stuff. I think he should play some darker roles.
I used to like Ryan Gosling (he was great in the believer) but he has been in a lot of crap and has been over praised. He reminds me of someones' annoying little brother.
JGL is in little movies and I'm glad. But, he is only known because of his TV career. Otherwise, he would be just some indie actor.
Heath had to pretend to be straight? Heath fucked enough women to fill a stadium. He didn't have to prove any straight credentials. He had nothing to dodge. Their just weren't any gay rumors about him.
It's true that any actor could have played the Joker, but it was Heath's PERFORMANCE that powered that movie to 2nd place behind Titanic. Not just any actor could do that. Heath performance was on a whole different level. I can't actually think of any actor that would combine the physicality (this Joker could actually kick ass and take names), intelligence, sexual allure and fierceness need to play this particular version of the Joker, and that includes people like Depp.
Post a Comment