Saturday 22 January 2011

When The World Was Young

Heath Ledger 1988Heath Ledger and unknown boy, 1988


Ah, the apple trees,
Blossoms in the breeze,
That we walked among,
Lying in the hay,
Games we used to play,
While the rounds were sung,
Only yesterday, when the world was young.

Angele Vannier and Johnny Mercer

3,120 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 400 of 3120   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

Not true, more men are gay than bisexual.

I'm not denying that, but you can't really get a register on bisexual in the (closet) men, because they won't talk about it, they deal with most like themselves, and consider themselves or call themselves str8. So, no survey or true survey, as with Are you str8 or Gay.
In that case, they would say str8, not bisexual.

Anonymous said...

you can't really get a register on bisexual in the (closet) men

Doesn't matter, you can do that with men who aren't celebrities. Check out out celebrities - much more gay men and women than bisexuals.

Anonymous said...

Sorry for the rant, but this is what (I) think is Wrong with him.

Not sure I get it - Jake is bisexual men who never dates women and that is his problem? Because bisexual man can find women he likes and date them.

Anonymous said...

Doesn't matter, you can do that with men who aren't celebrities. Check out out celebrities - much more gay men and women than bisexuals.

Not denying that either, I would agree that there are more OUT gay celebrities because the (bisexual ones) are hiding, or not openly discussing there sexuality.
I'm talking about bisexual men (men who have sex with women and men) but men secretely on the side.
Now there are more openly OUT bisexual female celebrities. Wait a minute, there are NO openly bisexual male stars. NONE

repost said...

Nat, Michelle, James & co Oscar roundtable:

Oscar roundtable

Anonymous said...

Re. roundtable. I like Nat's self confidence. I've the impression she doesn't like Michelle too much.
Look at how Michelle looks shyly away when Franco smiles at her. That gal develops little crushes with every cute guy around lol.

Anonymous said...

Wait a minute, there are NO openly bisexual male stars.

Elton John and Michael Stipe were "bisexual" before they were gay.

Anonymous said...

I'm talking about bisexual men (men who have sex with women and men) but men secretely on the side.

OK, but what that has to do with Jake and his beards?

Anonymous said...

I'm talking about bisexual men (men who have sex with women and men) but men secretely on the side.

That is NOT bisexual. Bisexual men are capable of having real, sexual relationships with women without needing gay sex at the same time.

Anonymous said...

Not sure I get it - Jake is bisexual men who never dates women and that is his problem? Because bisexual man can find women he likes and date them.

NO.

I think Jake has dated women.
I think his relationship with Kirsten was real. Some may not, I do. I don't think everytime he's with a women it's a showmance. Do I think he and Austin was involved, yes I do. But as friends with benefits.

Anonymous said...

So how come that Jake didn't date a woman last 5 years? He obviously doesn't enjoy spending time with his beards, bisexual man would be able to find a woman he likes enough to date her and have a good time.

Anonymous said...

That is NOT bisexual. Bisexual men are capable of having real, sexual relationships with women without needing gay sex at the same time.

Ok, Can you name me 1 openly bisexaul MALE celebrity?

I don't think so and I don't think you will find one. Because they won't do it. Women will though.

Men and Women can be interested in sex with both sexes. In most of the situations, the male would very seldom openly tell others that he is interested in sex with men ALSO.

Can gay men and Women have sex with the opposite sex?, YES. but I think those gay people would have sex with a SAME SEX person most of the time.

As I think most BISEXUAL Women and MEN would mostly have sex with the opposite sex and it would probably be the Primary relationship.

Anonymous said...

anon 4:37 How would you know of a bisexual man if he does not openly say he is bisexual.

I have said that I do NOT think every woman Jake is seen with is a beard.

Anonymous said...

4:21, Franco was friends with Heath.

I watched the roundtable and I was MOST impressed with Annette Bening AND Colin Firth. I kept thinking they should work together until I realized they did--over 20 years ago in Valmont.

They were both SO articulate and intelligent. Colin, in particular, was very funny. I loved when his comments when the topic switched to love scenes.

Michelle seemed very shy. I did notice she had on A LOT of makeup. Wow. Annette and Natalie Portman barely had makeup on--even Nicole Kidman's makeup wasn't as heavy as Michelle's. I thought that was interesting.

Anonymous said...

anon 4:37 How would you know of a bisexual man if he does not openly say he is bisexual

Same as gay closeted men - based on his relationships.

Anonymous said...

I have said that I do NOT think every woman Jake is seen with is a beard.

Reese Witherspoon and Taylor Swift were beards, every Jake fan can see that. So how come that Jake didn't date a woman last 5 years? He obviously doesn't enjoy spending time with his beards, bisexual man would be able to find a woman he likes enough to date her and have a good time.

Anonymous said...

4:21, Franco was friends with Heath.


Really? Never heard of that.
Maybe you are confusing Franco with JGL. Now JGL was friends with Heath.

Anonymous said...

Franco is a bit too pretentious to be Heath's friend. He was laid back and his friends too, even Jake.

Anonymous said...

Jake's not pretentious???

Anonymous said...

As I think most BISEXUAL Women and MEN would mostly have sex with the opposite sex and it would probably be the Primary relationship.

There is no primary relationship if you are bisexual and bisexuality is not just about sex - bisexual persons are able to have satisfying emotional and sexual relationships with both sexes, one at the time.

Anonymous said...

Jake's not pretentious???

Jake is still trying to figure out what he wants to be.

Anonymous said...

How do you know Franco wasn't Heath's friend? Maybe he was. You perceive him as pretentious, others may not, Heath included.

Anonymous said...

How do you know Franco wasn't Heath's friend? Maybe he was. You perceive him as pretentious, others may not, Heath included.

I'm a Heath follower since I was a teenager (and he too for that matter) and never heard of him being friends with Franco. Not once. Some perceive Franco as pretentions, some don't. I have a right to voice my opinion.


Where did you read/hear about Heath and Franco being friends, if I may ask? From actors friends, I know he was friends with Bloom for a short while. With Matt Damom as well. Josh Hartnett i.e. was part of his posse and JGL hung out with The Masses.

Anonymous said...

Jake's not pretentious???

He may be a latent tabloid attention seeker, but he doesn't come off as pretentious to me. He seems to be a nice guy with a great sense of humor.

What do you perceive as pretentious about Jake`?

Anonymous said...

I've the impression she doesn't like Michelle too much.

Why? Nat smiled and listened Michelle with attention.

Anonymous said...

Jake is too dim to be pretentious.

Anonymous said...

^^lol

Anonymous said...

I didn't say I know for a fact Heath and Franco were friends but 'Franco is pretentious' is no reason to think they weren't or wouldn't have been friends. People think Heath was friends with Jake and he's a lazy famewhore. Heath was a very private man with all kinds of creative interests and his friends are like him so by that logic Jake is too much of a attention whore to be Heath's friend.

Anonymous said...

Jake, have you arrived at Sundance Film Festival yet?

Anonymous said...

Jake's attention seeking got worse, who knows if he and Heath would have remained friends. They would have to keep in touch though, because of little M..

Anonymous said...

There is no primary relationship if you are bisexual and bisexuality is not just about sex - bisexual persons are able to have satisfying emotional and sexual relationships with both sexes, one at the time.

^^

I don't agree..

There are married women and Men who are bisexual, who could care for and maybe love another person of the same sex, that does not mean they have to all be partners at the same time. Are you saying this?

My example is: A married man or woman, or, a (guy) with a gf, a (girl) with a bf could be interested in sex with a person of the same sex. They may acknowledge it to their partners and be open and accepting about it, or they may hide it, but "their" relationship is the primary one.
They are together!
They just have sex with the same sex person occasionally "together", or, "separately".
It all depends on the persons and how open they are to things.

Some couples know of a partners bisexual habits. It sounds like you are saying that if the MAN is not open about his sexuality and sneaks around on his female partner, he is then gay. Most people feel this way. It's not true.

Being open to the partner is the best way I say, but it does not make the male interest in BOTH sexes less imo.

Jacob Benjamin Gyllenhaal said...

Jake, have you arrived at Sundance Film Festival yet?

No, I'm planning on hanging out with Busy and her family, then hanging out with Maggie and her family, then follow Taylor Swift on world tour. And am hoping to make many, many tabloid covers. Sigh!

Anonymous said...

Some couples know of a partners bisexual habits. It sounds like you are saying that if the MAN is not open about his sexuality and sneaks around on his female partner, he is then gay.

You can't redefine term bisexual as you please. Bisexual is not about cheating or having sex with men and women, it is about ability to have real relationships with both sexes without the need for the third person.

Anonymous said...

Jacob Benjamin Gyllenhaal, I would also recommend kicking a paparazzi or two in the process - to show people that you are very private person and macho man.

Jacob Benjamin said...

I'm a lover not a fighter!

kicked and spitted at paparazzi said...

Bitch, please!

Anonymous said...

kicked and spitted at paparazzi said...
Bitch, please!


Missed that. Link please!

Anonymous said...

Wow, that was long time ago - TMZ.com 2008?

Anonymous said...

Can anyone post a link? Did he hurt the paparazzo?

Anonymous said...

Is Jake on tour with Swift???!!

Anonymous said...

Just a little :) Spitting at another paparazzi was worse IMO, that was when he was called to be part of the jury and that second paparazzi wasn't pushy or anything.

Anonymous said...

6:27 PM #1 - no, Jake can't stand beard's music! lol

Anonymous said...

6:27 PM # 2 - it sounds weird but i want to see that. If someone finds the video, be so kind and post it.

Anonymous said...

It may be in the TMZ archives

Anonymous said...

Go to work Jake and detach yourself form famous blondes!

It seems a lifetime away when little boys were all obsessed with Donnie Darko. He used to be such a cool actor. Doesn't he miss that?

Anonymous said...

1/28/2009

Jake Gyllenhaal was so bored after his first day of jury service yesterday, he could spit. Yes, we know it doesn't make sense, but he spit as he left the courthouse.

http://www.tmz.com/2009/01/28/jake-g-spits-up-after-court/

Anonymous said...

1/28/2009

Jake Gyllenhaal was so bored after his first day of jury service yesterday, he could spit. Yes, we know it doesn't make sense, but he spit as he left the courthouse.

http://www.tmz.com/2009/01/28/jake-g-spits-up-after-court/


The vid is not available anymore. But it doesn't say he spat at paparazzi or physically hurt them. If he did, I think it would have been mentioned. IDK, but Jake doesn't seem the type to kick someone. When I read about it, I was picturing him kicking someone with his foot in the head or other parts of the body.

Anonymous said...

But it doesn't say he spat at paparazzi or physically hurt them.

Check out WFT2 comments from that time.

Anonymous said...

A videographer followed actor Jake Gyllenhaal as he was returning from a scheduled lunch break during jury duty on Wednesday (January 28) in Los Angeles. The 28-year-old frustrated actor was seen walking into a door after pushing instead of pulling and then kicking the videographer’s shin.

To watch the shin-kicking video, visit TMZ.com:

http://www.tmz.com/videos?autoplay=true&mediaKey=0448100b-2606-446c-85fe-d54df7411c4f

Anonymous said...

^^^ From 2009.

Anonymous said...

I read TMZ comments and nothing is mentioned about kicking. 2 posters were insinuating that the spit was directed at the cameraman, but it obviously didn't reach him as the cameraman would have mentioned it. Maybe Jake spat at the cameraman's direction, but didn't actually want to spit at him? Kind of symbolically?

Anonymous said...

Spittin’ and Kickin’

I’m sure a lot of the videos have been scrubbed by Jake’s PR team, but here is the WFT2 thread back in January 28, 2009

Anonymous said...

James Franco: I have a lot of respect for porn actors: http://www.usmagazine.com/moviestvmusic/news/james-franco-i-have-a-lot-of-respect-for-porn-stars-2011241

Anonymous said...

To watch the shin-kicking video, visit TMZ.com:

http://www.tmz.com/videos?autoplay=true&mediaKey=0448100b-2606-446c-85fe-d54df7411c4f


Thanks for that. Jake was obviously in a hurry and who knows if Jake really kicked his shin. I'd take what paparazzi say with a grain of salt. He obviously wanted to sell his video and story.

If I'm in a hurry and someone is taking to me or holding me back, I shout too. Nobody is perfect and can always behave perfectly.

Anonymous said...

We are talking about 2 paparazzi and 2 separate incidents. Jake was walking towards paparazzi and spitted near his feet - disgusting gesture from publicity whore during reeke time.

Anonymous said...

Well then Jake doesn't have to worry. Because he sure as heck ain't perfect.

The problem with Jake is he courts and manipulates the paparazzi when it suits his purposes/advances his "I'm so straight, see me strut like a man" agenda, but when the heat starts turning up he blows up like a spoiled kid. Jake is a nice guy. But, he lives a sheltered and pampered existence.

Anonymous said...

But, he lives a sheltered and pampered existence.

^^
Most of the Hollywood actors do

Anonymous said...

LAOD has reached over 76 millions internationally. Maybe it'll reach to 90? Jake's movies do better overseas lately. The US audiences don't seem as fond of him. Just look at the difference in b.o. for PoP inside and ouside the US.
Most of the time domestic films do much better at home, if you check out b.o. mojo.

Anonymous said...

Natalie' Black Swan is a HUGE hit domestically and internationally.
Man does she have a successful year.

The Oscar is sure hers.

Anonymous said...

I did notice she had on A LOT of makeup. Wow. Annette and Natalie Portman barely had makeup on--even Nicole Kidman's makeup wasn't as heavy as Michelle's. I thought that was interesting.

Natalie used the "no make up look". She has as much make up on just lighter colors. Take a closer look! That said, I find Michelle to be pretty, but damn she pales next to Natalie.

Anonymous said...

Most of the Hollywood actors are pampered

Not like Jake. He is so deep in the closet and has his interviews so tightly controlled that you almost can't get a real moment out of him any more. He didn't use to be that way until Reeke.

Anonymous said...

Bisexual is not about cheating or having sex with men and women, it is about ability to have real relationships with both sexes without the need for the third person.

^^^ Sorry, We are gonna have to agree to disagree.

You can't redefine term bisexual as you please.

^^ Well, it sure seems that you are doing Just That.

Who said that being bisexual was about cheating? I did NOT. I said that a bisexual MAN can be in a relationship with a female and cheat with her with a man because he has a sexual interest in men also, just as he has with women!
Although in one example, the male does not openly tell his female partner about his interest in men because of whatever reason.
More than likely the reason would be societys {dismissal} of bisexual men.

So are you saying that a married man, or, a married woman of opposite sexes cannot be bisexual?

Are you saying that the couple cannot be bisexual also and ACT on their sexual desires?

Anonymous said...

James Franco: I have a lot of respect for porn actors: http://www.usmagazine.com/moviestvmusic/news/james-franco-i-have-a-lot-of-respect-for-porn-stars-2011241

James Franco wants attention through controversy.

Before getting attacked, yes I know Jake is a famewhore.

(I feel like before I can critisize an actor loved by WFT 2 buch, I have to make clear that I'm not happy with Jake either, otherwise I get attacked and Jake too naturally, lol)

Anonymous said...

James Franco and Anne Hathaway Oscar promo pics:

ONTD

Anonymous said...

(I feel like before I can critisize an actor loved by WFT 2 buch, I have to make clear that I'm not happy with Jake either, otherwise I get attacked and Jake too naturally, lol)

you said it right. with some here you can't criticize anybody the masses here like "unless" you criticize Jake, first. Then your rant about the other celeb will be acceptable. Well maybe.. lol

Anonymous said...

That's too deep 9:39 :)

Anonymous said...

Bisexuals are just like straight people--most of them fall for someone and settle down into a monogamous relationship. Yes, like gays and straights, some of them have open relationships, or cheat on their partners.

Defining bisexuality as someone who fucks with men and women indiscriminately, or who always need to have their same-sex action on the side, is just flat out wrong.

Anonymous said...

Bisexuals are just like straight people--most of them fall for someone and settle down into a monogamous relationship. Yes, like gays and straights, some of them have open relationships, or cheat on their partners.

Defining bisexuality as someone who fucks with men and women indiscriminately, or who always need to have their same-sex action on the side, is just flat out wrong.

^^
Well, when the word cheat was used, that example and word got slammed and criticized. Then the rubutal was that bisexual people did not have to resort to this type of behavior etc etc.

Apparently you did not understand and maybe still don't, that my point was that str8, bisexual and gay people can be monogamous and they (do cheat) also. Bisexual people are not exempt from any of this behavior, but when some bi Men cheat just as str8 and gay men do, it (possibly) will be with another MAN. Friend or Stranger Who knows.

Although he maintains a relationship with a wife/girlfriend.

He does not have to cheat if his wife/girlfriend knows of his bisexuality, accepts it, and maybe participates with him/them.

Otherwise, you have an example of an (In The Closet Bisexual Man).


Finished!

Anonymous said...

Apparently you did not understand and maybe still don't, that my point was that str8, bisexual and gay people can be monogamous and they (do cheat) also.

Why did you make that point about bisexuals (you talked only about bisexuals)? What that has to do with Jake?

Anonymous said...

James Franco and Anne Hathaway Oscar promo pics

Looking good! Anne, darling, you are tall and slim, you don't need platform shoes.

Anne said...

James, is that you?

Anonymous said...

He does not have to cheat if his wife/girlfriend knows of his bisexuality, accepts it, and maybe participates with him/them.

You still don't understand what bisexuality means.

reminder said...

Oscar nominations will be announced at 5:30AM PT.

Anonymous said...

"Looking good! Anne, darling, you are tall and slim, you don't need platform shoes."

I agree. When they host the Oscars she should't wear platform shoes and smaller heals would be nice. It'd look stupid if she looked taller than James.

Anonymous said...

And James isn't a small man either, he is 5'10.

RDJ said...

There are nice platform shoes for men, too!

tabloids bearding fiction said...

British Enquirer has an article saying one of the reasons Jake dumped Taylor is because she is a total control freak. He freaked out when she gave him a spreadsheet with a year long fixed schedule for 2011 marking what specific days and exactly where in the world he needs to be to meet up with her while she is on tour. He thought it was too much to commit to that pre-arranged itinerary and ended the relationship.

Swift Beard said...

Well DUH!!! I'm working, ain't I?

Anonymous said...

tabloids bearding fiction

That "reason" looks good at first glance, but it is still nonsense: Jake didn't know the beard is a singer who tours and was surprised to find out she won't be in US all the time. lol

Oscars said...

Watch LIVE: Academy Award Nominations http://bit.ly/eMj2Pl

Anonymous said...

Oscar 2011 nominations Best Actress: Natalie Portman, Michelle Williams, Nicole Kidman, Jennifer Lawrence, Annette Bening

Anonymous said...

James Franco was just nominated for an Oscar for Best Actor.

Anonymous said...

Best Actor: Javier Bardem, Colin Firth, James Franco, Jesse Eisenberg and Jeff Bridges

Anonymous said...

Oscar noms: Picture: Black Swan, Fighter, Inception, Kids Are.., King's Speech, 127Hrs, Social Network, Toy Story3, True Grit, Winter's Bone

Anonymous said...

Director: Darren Aronofsky, David O. Russell, Tom Hooper, David Fincher, Joel & Ethan Coen #Oscars

Anonymous said...

Congratulations Michelle, Nat and Franco! Sorry Ryan G.

Anonymous said...

Where's Jake's name? That's right there's no award for Best Famewhore in a Bearding Contract.

Anonymous said...

I was wondering how tall James is because I just saw the Oscar commercial on ABC with Anne and James and Anne TOWERS over James. (He looks like he's 5'5 next to her). It's a cute commercial though.

Congrats to James, Natalie and yeah--Michelle!!! (I bet Jake will attend one of those Oscar parties and be wrapped around Michelle like a vise)

James said...

He looks like he's 5'5 next to her.

*calls RDJ*

Anonymous said...

I bet Jake will attend one of those Oscar parties

Jake has a movie to promote, he should be a presenter. PR?

O said...

Performance by an actor in a supporting role

* Christian Bale in "The Fighter" (Paramount)
* John Hawkes in "Winter's Bone" (Roadside Attractions)
* Jeremy Renner in "The Town" (Warner Bros.)
* Mark Ruffalo in "The Kids Are All Right" (Focus Features)
* Geoffrey Rush in "The King's Speech" (The Weinstein Company)

Anonymous said...

Anne and James really are cute together. They should do a film but Anne should wear flats if they do. How tall is she?

Anonymous said...

Why wasn't Jennifer Lawrence at the Oscar Roundtable?

Anonymous said...

They didn't know Jennifer will be nominated :)

Anonymous said...

Why did you make that point about bisexuals (you talked only about bisexuals)? What that has to do with Jake?

the poster said they thought the problem with Jake was that he was a closeted bisexual some post ago.
Someone asked (WTF is wrong with Jake).

Anonymous said...

Where's Jake's name? That's right there's no award for Best Famewhore in a Bearding Contract.

^^ I bet you were one of those (Jake Fans?) who were pulling your hair out by the roots when you heard Jake was nominated for the GG, Were'nt you? LMAO
You know, Upset and Angry because... ahhh, his career was over.....

But Now... You can shine, smile and throw plenty of hate because he lies to YOU. Have fun.....

Anonymous said...

10:18 AM - but that poster didn't give any arguments WHY he/she thinks Jake is bisexual and his/her idea of bisexuality is different from official definition.

Anonymous said...

You need to relax 10:24

Anonymous said...

10:24 AM - Jake lies to YOU and everyone else, just like any other closeted gay celebrity.

Anonymous said...

I bet you were one of those (Jake Fans?) who were pulling your hair out by the roots when you heard Jake was nominated for the GG, Were'nt you?

You are the only one who thinks that GG nominations can turn LAOD into good movie with good box office and great performances.

Anonymous said...

^^ I bet you were one of those (Jake Fans?) who were pulling your hair out by the roots when you heard Jake was nominated for the GG, Were'nt you? LMAO
You know, Upset and Angry because... ahhh, his career was over.....

But Now... You can shine, smile and throw plenty of hate because he lies to YOU. Have fun.....


Stop with the moral preaching, you silly troll. This isn't Sunday school.

IMDb said...

How tall is she?

Height 5' 8" (1.73 m)

Anonymous said...

Jake lies to YOU and everyone else, just like any other closeted gay celebrity.

^ not my problem, and shouldn't be yours either! If Jake is gay, he'll deal with his issues in his time, not mine. This applys to other closeted actors also.

J. Renner, Spacey, Cruise??, J.Foxx
oh, I forgot, they have to be young and HOT to get upset with them.

Anonymous said...

She's only 5'8???? I thought she was 5'11 or 6 feet the way she TOWERS over Franco in all the Oscar promos.

She also seemed the same height as Jake who I know is six feet.

Anonymous said...

Did you even see Anne's wearing heels???

Anonymous said...

but that poster didn't give any arguments WHY he/she thinks Jake is bisexual and his/her idea of bisexuality is different from official definition.



^^^ this is part of it

Since then I have heard of many Hollywood young and old male stars who are in the closet. I believe some, I know this does and can happen, I also know there is more than what we see and more to these things than we know.

So many of the men, especially the young one's with the rumors have gotten married and some have a child or children now. (Orlando Bloom - Many rumors of he and the Viggo Morteson from LOTR , way more than J/A) Both married with kids now. I know the rationale that they can still be in the closet, True.

But, Some may not be and it can just be rumors! Also, Some can be bi-sexual men, young and old who don't want to, or will not come out as bisexual. In the closet bisexuals. LOL
It happens Wayyyy more than the avaerage person realizes.

Anonymous said...

We don't have just rumors - we have bearding and gay Jake Gyllenhaal.

Anonymous said...

The "upset" troll comes here everyday, preaching to everyone about what they should think, say and do. Only someone who is upset themselves would bother. The twisted knickers troll - that's your new name!

Anonymous said...

we have bearding and gay Jake Gyllenhaal.

^^ your assessment could be True.

It also can mean:

1. Straight man with girlfriend and all the troubles that comes with any relationship. You do know this don't you?

2. Bi man who will always have a female as primary relationship (girlfriend / wife). Interested in men also. Deals with them privately and away from spotlight.

3. Bi man with a girlfriend but know that people thinks he's gay or bi, so will try very hard to prove the watching public wrong.

4. Or gay man who may have sex with females (at times). This happens. Really is gay but really likes women also.

Anonymous said...

Only someone who is upset themselves would bother. The twisted knickers troll - that's your new name!


and you're upset with Jake about what? Why?

Anonymous said...

Other than what you perceive as bearding, where is the unrefutable proof Jake is gay? What hard facts do we have?

Anonymous said...

It also can mean...

Not in Jake's case. Jake didn't date females in the last 5 years and gay men don't like sex with women (4.).

Anonymous said...

and you're upset with Jake about what? Why?

You ASSUME a lot - as well as preaching. Like someone said, chill out.

Anonymous said...

Other than what you perceive as bearding, where is the unrefutable proof Jake is gay? What hard facts do we have?

All this very PUBLIC "girlfriends" and "relationships" and you still have NO proof that Jake is straight??? Unfuckingbelievable! lol

Anonymous said...

MY PUSSY STINKS!

Anonymous said...

◕ ‿ ◕

Anonymous said...

UV -> BO -> LOL

Anonymous said...

11:54 AM #1, we don't care about your pussy.

Anonymous said...

After years of following Jake and his beardings, now we are all less naive and very aware of how PR works. I found some old tabloids stories about Jake and Kirsten. It’s very interesting to read these articles now with the perspective we gained after Reeke and Taylor. If you read them, you will see that it’s the exact same thing Jake is doing now. Same staged photo ops, same PR bearding fiction. Kirsten was a better beard for Jake because they had good chemistry and were friends, but reading this it’s obvious their relationship was all PR manufactured too with the same purpose: creating an image of the ‘perfect couple’ with the ‘it’ girl of the moment, pushing Jake as ‘straight’ good guy and pimping Jake into big stardom with tabloids publicity.

US Weekly – J&K new couple

Star – J&K to Marry!

US Weekly – K & J It’s over!

US Weekly – Jake wants Kirsten back!

US Weekly – K & J heat up again!

US Weekly – K & J Lunch of Laughs

Anonymous said...

All this very PUBLIC "girlfriends" and "relationships" and you still have NO proof that Jake is straight??? Unfuckingbelievable! lol

the interesting thing is, you think you have proof that he's gay, lol. Newsflash, Nobody does, this includes you and your beliefs and wishes.

As soon as you realize this, maybe when you're 17 or 18 lol, you can calm down.

belief does not = True Fact!
Get it.

Anonymous said...

Thanks 12:08 PM!

Anonymous said...

As soon as you realize this, maybe when you're 17 or 18 lol, you can calm down.

LOL!

I'm 100% sure Jake is gay, just like I was 100% sure Ricky is gay and bearding or 100% sure Bradley Cooper is gay and bearding.

Anonymous said...

Kirsten was a better beard for Jake because they had good chemistry and were friends

You are right about that.
And after all that "made to be together" crap Jake needed five minutes to start ignoring and forget all about Dunst, just like he doesn't give a shit about the chin.

Anonymous said...

"It’s very interesting to read these articles now with the perspective we gained after Reeke and Taylor."

Thanks for posting. I read the first two. That was enough BS to endure for one day.

Anonymous said...

LOL! :)

Anonymous said...

or 100% sure Bradley Cooper is gay and bearding.

^^ oh goodness gracious, here we go again. 100%????
Pictures sweetheart. ok
not one of he and a girl walking which you will continue to scream "see, he's bearding". LMAO
Do you know how you sound?
Like someone with mental issues.

otherwise your beliefs and wishes make you look like a desparate needy gay young person. You're going the wrong way. ok

Anonymous said...

It's been interesting to see comments about Jake on other sites over the past few months. Obviously the main topic is Taylor.

It's also very interesting that someone here keeps accusing regulars of being upset, and hating on Jake.

The irony is that if you read comments on other mainstream sites, it is the JiS regular Joe's who are clearly posting negative comments about Jake (mainly in relation to the fauxmance) - not necessarily saying he is gay, but calling him creepy and weird.

Fans tend to get "upset" when they see "their star" acting in a way that is contrary to their expectations of that famous person. Of course this is a generalization, but mostly true.

The babblers are a case in point. They are hardcore JiS fans, and have certain expectations of him. It is very obvious that there is an underlying wish that the whole Taylor thing will just go away. They are biting their tongues, but a few are vocal. Hey, they were all expecting personal invites to Jake and Reese's wedding of the decade. Still waiting.

Back to the point about posters here being upset (LOL). I think the posters here can see through all the BS, and at times can even predict what Jake/PR will do next.

JiG posters know that Jake will not be coming out of the closet anytime soon, so that is not their expectation, and I don't see anyone getting upset (LOL again) at Jake for that reason. There are also no expectations in terms of Taylor, as we all know it is a charade.

/rant

Anonymous said...

12:41 PM, your ignorance and trolling is annoying. Don't you have anything to say beside "you are all wrong because Jake can't be gay"?

Anonymous said...

Do you know how you sound?

Go back to your tabloids, you are embarrassing yourself.

Anonymous said...

Why Are Women So Turned On By Guys Kissing, and Homosexual Sex?
I'm guessing that it's the same as how men are turned on by lesbians?

DL

Anonymous said...

I'm guessing that it's the same as how men are turned on by lesbians?

That would make sense.

Anonymous said...

Question for straight chiks of this site: Would you date a
self-defined bisexual man? Not dating just as in going out and have sex,i mean as being in a partnership and consider the possibility of an eventual marriage and have children with..

Anonymous said...

No, I wouldn't risk wasting time with someone on his way to Gayville.

beer and football said...

I believe kids are the only reason why men need women, they would have much more fun dating and living with other men.

Anonymous said...

No I would just buy a dildo.

Anonymous said...

Question for straight chiks of this site: Would you date a self-defined bisexual man?

Yes for dating, no for marriage.

Anonymous said...

Question for straight chiks of this site: Would you date a self-defined bisexual man?

Ok, let's try something different.

Ask any straight of bi man/guy on this site or somewhere else, if they would date or Marry a self-defined bisexual woman?

Now brace yourself for all of the biases and prejudices that were for the other question as opposed to this question.

Anonymous said...

Thought so. Bi men are good enough for sexual fantasies and make women to be curious about them but that's it.At the end, they all rather to be with a "real man". And real men don't suck cock

Toothy knows this very well.

Anonymous said...

The question was for straight women, if you want to post a question for straight men, go ahead.

Anonymous said...

Very interesting article about Taylor Swift's marketing strategy and the business side of the bearding showmance with Jake from her POV:

A Day in the Life of the Search Keyword “Taylor Swift”

...On January 21st, there were 1,560 videos uploaded to YouTube tagged in her name,...
...Her video for “Back to December” was the most watched clip on YouTube this week, amassing 5.5 million views...
...in Google News, there were 2,680 new “Taylor Swift” headlines. The most reported items were speculative Swillenhaal relationship stories: a dinner in Nashville prompted hundreds of “Taylor Swift and Jake Gyllenhaal back together?” posts...
...the crucial link was posted on CMT, whose “OFFSTAGE: Taylor Swift Will Have to Write a Long Song About Jake Gyllenhaal” post, like AOL’s Boot-Popeater, bridges her personal life to her professional...
...as much as her lifestyle projects “charmingly attainable,” what resonates strongest is the reoccurring intersection between Taylor Swift and other idols of mass media. By appropriating her relationships with similarly well-defined teen-poster personas like Joe Jonas, Taylor Lautner and Jake Gyllenhaal in song, she has commercialized her life to an impossibly accessible degree. The most intimate connection a fan can make to Taylor Swift is to supplement her music by consuming the professional and extra-professional output of her love interests, their excitement magnified by the vast pre-Taylor popularity of her suitors. When prop iconography in “Back to December” points to Lautner through his Twilight idol, it doubles the blurring of her personal life and her professional life. They’re perfect icons. The Twilight bookcover apple appears on Swift’s dining room table in “Back to December,” visually uniting music, film and text, a single image fusing art, commerce, and personal relationships. “Taylor Swift” lives in that intersection. It’s where those videos come from, those 2,680 stories, those 1,560 Friday contributions to her YouTube name: an endless feedback loop of facts about Taylor Swift.

The Fader

a proud jake g. fan said...

(I bet Jake will attend one of those Oscar parties and be wrapped around Michelle like a vise)

So, the only time we'll be associating Jake with Oscars is when his sister or one of his successful actor friends is being nominated and he'll attend the parties with them? If so, I guess I have to get used to that.
On the bright side, Jake and PoP didn't receive any Razzie nods. I think that is at least something. Now every year instead of crossing my fingers for Jake to receive an Oscar nod, I'll be crossing my fingers for him NOT to get a Razzie nod.

Anonymous said...

:)

Anonymous said...

Very interesting article about Taylor Swift's marketing strategy and the business side of the bearding showmance with Jake from her POV

All that is very visible to anyone who is smart enough not to buy tabloid and PR shit.

Anonymous said...

Toothy knows this very well.

Totally immaterial: Toothy is gay + millions of women would date bisexual Toothy, it's not like dating means you're going to marry someone.

Anonymous said...

Ask any straight of bi man/guy on this site or somewhere else, if they would date or Marry a self-defined bisexual woman?

Straight men prefer straight women, as expected.

Jake said...

So, the only time we'll be associating Jake with Oscars is when his sister or one of his successful actor friends is being nominated and he'll attend the parties with them? If so, I guess I have to get used to that.

The century is still young!

Advocate.com said...

Cumming vs. Everett, Chamberlain

Alan Cumming says Rupert Everett and Richard Chamberlain are “irresponsible” for suggesting that actors hoping to one day be leading men should stay in the closet, saying they should “think about a little gay boy in Wisconsin.”

The star of The Good Wife was referring to comments by the actors suggesting Hollywood isn’t ready for a gay leading man. Chamberlain told The Advocate he “wouldn’t advise a gay leading man-type actor to come out,” while Everett told the BBC he “never got a job” in Hollywood after coming out.

"I think it's so mean-spirited," Cumming told London's Guardian. "If you're living a lie, that's not healthy, and I think it is really irresponsible of [Chamberlain] and Rupert to say these things."

When asked if he thought they made a point, Cumming responded, "But it's not about your work. It's about how you exist as a person in the world, and the idea that your work is more important than you as a person is a horrible, horrible message. I always think about a little gay boy in Wisconsin or a little lesbian in Arkansas seeing someone like me, and if I cannot be open in my life, how on earth can they? Anyway, it's an academic question: How can you know [that coming out affects your career]? Some people get less work than others and it has nothing to do with sexuality."

Anonymous said...

It's easy to criticise when you're on a top rated television show; Alan's had a pretty good run of it for several years, but one day the phone will stop ringing for him, too. Wonder what he'll think then?

Jake said...

It's about how you exist as a person in the world, and the idea that your work is more important than you as a person is a horrible, horrible message.

Pfttt!

Anonymous said...

Babblers posted the new Source Code poster. I thought it was joke at first. Jake looks as wimpy as that shot of him on the horse when they were filming POP or the bare chested Prince with his hand on his hip. He is carrying the gun in his hand like its dog poop. Not flattering at all. Step one for Source Code is not a success. Unless he is supposed to be a wimp in the film. That they sold. But it does not make me want to see the film at all.

Anonymous said...

IA. That poster is woeful. Why is Jake so tiny in relation to the size of the poster? Looks like they are almost trying to hide the fact that he is in the movie :/

Anonymous said...

^Poster: SOURCE CODE – Must Try Harder

Duncan (Moon) Jones’ sophomore science fiction effort Source Code, starring the ever mediocre Jake Gyllenhaal, is starting to make me real nervous. What we’ve seen in the two trailers to date have been less than dazzling, giving off a heavy feeling of deja vu, like we’ve maybe seen this story told before, in the film Deja Vu. And it always seems rather ordinary, doesn’t it?
Nevertheless, Jones has so far proved a skilled director with a subtle touch and Summit Entertainment were always going to have final say on the marketing and cutting of a trailer which is of course aimed at the lowest common denominator and mimics the last big blockbuster hit (in this case Inception), so we aren’t ready to bail on this film yet.
However slight reason to be nervous number 2 comes in a recent interview with Devin Faraci for Badass Digest in which he says, among other things;
“It’s been a very different way of operating. It was more than just a pre-existing script – when I got on board there was already a production plan for how to make the film. When I came in with my wacky ideas it threw a few curve balls at the people actually putting the production together…Fortunately they were very flexible and they understood that I was going to come in with my own ideas and my own thoughts on how to do things. We found ways to adapt and to do things within the time frame we had to actually make things work the way I thought we needed to proceed.”
This leads me to wonder about the real depth of Jones’ input. Will we notice it? For all the mentions of his creative ideas it does sound a little like he was almost a director for hire on this one. Have we lost another promising director to the studio blockbuster machine?

Anonymous said...

Now to add to these two slightly worrying signals is the new one sheet for the film. Now I’m not saying that a poster is any arbiter of the quality of your film but surely they could have come up with something a little more original than this. And yes, we know Jake Gyllenhaal is a turn-off, but have the confidence in his star power not to push him as far into the background so you have to eye squint to work out who it is.
Maybe they were hoping we would think he was Matt Damon?
It holds firm to that hoary old cliche of ‘man running down road with gun in hand’. When you add to this the scattered stills from the film, which bizarrely remind me of the ones found on the back of videos from yesteryear and the frankly odd grin on Gyllenhaal’s face you have a very strangely composed poster. It’s as if they sat around saying they wanted something a little like Inception but can we make it blander.
The only thing that stands out on this poster is what I think may be one of those QR code thingies in the bottom right for scanning with your mobile. Hopefully whatever that gets you is better than this.
Tickets to the premiere maybe, at SXSW on March 11th.

http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/movie-news/poster-source-code-must-try-harder.php

Anonymous said...

starring the ever mediocre Jake Gyllenhaal

Gawd! Give away the tabloid sh!t Jake. NOW

Anonymous said...

http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/movie-news/poster-source-code-must-try-harder.php

I like poster idea, but they really need another picture of Jake.

Jake said...

starring the ever mediocre Jake Gyllenhaal
Gawd! Give away the tabloid sh!t Jake. NOW


But I'm GREAT at making tabloid shit!

Anonymous said...

No doubt about that :(

Anonymous said...

Tickets to the premiere maybe, at SXSW on March 11th.

Only 6 weeks till then.

Anonymous said...

And yes, we know Jake Gyllenhaal is a turn-off, but have the confidence in his star power not to push him as far into the background so you have to eye squint to work out who it is. Maybe they were hoping we would think he was Matt Damon?

WFT2 poster wrote that article? ;)

Anonymous said...

WFT2 poster wrote that article? ;)

:) Yes everyone is so upset. Wanna tissue?

Anonymous said...

Source Code is probably gonna suck.

Now he has a reputation as mediocre, later it'll be bad.

Did you see people's reactions to naked Gosling in BV and naked Jake in LAOD? Gosling was drooled over, Jake got mixed reactions. If you turn on someone you will find fault and flaws in him. It's natural.

Jake The Abs Gyllenhaal said...

Gosling who?

Anonymous said...

The problem is Jake doesn't seem to realize he has become a joke.
That's a big problem. And he has bad management and PR.

Anonymous said...

Check out the SC poster with the explosions and him kissing Michelle M. This is all full of cliches. People are tired of stuff that were portrayed in movies over and over. Critics will probably pan it. Did you read Jones' mentioning that he and Jake were open for sequels should SC end up a success? Seems Jake is still after that franchise. It's hopeless with him. Instead of looking for projects that really interest him or are challenging, he is hunting for his franchise. And he'll probably fail again. It's hopeless with him really. He is like a kid in a built man's body.

Anonymous said...

Did you read Jones' mentioning that he and Jake were open for sequels should SC end up a success?

Source Code sequels?

Anonymous said...

Yes, Jones mentioned that in one of his interviews. Only if SC ends up being successful that is. And this is quesionable, I think.

Anonymous said...

Oscar nod reactions:

Michelle Williams, Lead Actress, Blue Valentine: "Making Blue Valentine was unlike any experience I've ever had before, or may ever have again. I share this recognition with Ryan [Gosling] and Derek [Cianfrance] who always brought out the best in me. Thank you to the Academy and to The Weinstein Company for their support of this film."

Natalie Portman, Lead Actress, Black Swan: "I am so honored and grateful to the Academy for this recognition. It is a wonderful culmination of the 10-year journey with Darren [Aronofsky] to make this film. Making Black Swan is already the most meaningul experience of my career, and the passion shown for the film has completed the process of communication between artists and audience."

James Franco, Lead Actor, 127 Hours: "It feels great to be nominated and it is such an honor to be in the company of my fellow nominees. I'm especially proud of Danny Boyle and the whole team behind 127 Hours for their recognition by the Academy. Danny is such a wonderful entertainer and collaborator and to see the film nominated for Best Picture, Score, Screenplay, Song and Editing is thrilling."

http://www.stltoday.com/entertainment/movies/joe-williams/article_9bde138c-2917-11e0-ab68-0017a4a78c22.html

Anonymous said...

I share this recognition with Ryan [Gosling] and Derek [Cianfrance] who always brought out the best in me.

Nice :)

LOL said...

Watch: Jon Stewart Recites an Ode to James Franco's Oscar Nod http://bit.ly/eaEiAo

tabloids said...

InTouch Weekly:

"Taylor: Jake Spends the Night"

In Touch cover

Anonymous said...

Sure, we saw their after dinner pictures, Jake couldn't keep his hands off her! LMAO!

US Weekly said...

"Jake Begs Forgiveness"

US Weekly cover

Jake's PR said...

Men who run with gun in their hands love heterosexual sex with women of the opposite sex!

Anonymous said...

"Jake Begs Forgiveness"

Shit, they will milk done and over showmance for another 6 months.

Anonymous said...

"Jake Begs Forgiveness"

No more Jake The Man dumps his "girlfriend", we are back to "how we can use Jake to make our client look good" reeke script.

Anonymous said...

That's nothing. You want to throw up? Look at People magazine's cover story. I just saw it and wanted to toss last night's dinner.

Anonymous said...

^^^ LOL, who gives a shit about the fugly chin!

Anonymous said...

Look at People magazine's cover story.

Don't feel bad about the chin trashing Jake some more, he didn't learn anything from reeking and deserves to be trashed.

Anonymous said...

On the cover, it says Reese is so happy because she's with a "grown-up."

Oh lord.

Anonymous said...

Why are you so upset with Jake? Very bitter.

Jake said...

But I'm GREAT at making tabloid shit!

Told you!

Anonymous said...

9:43 AM #2: please take a look at articles / tabloid covers posted about in last 20-25 comments. Do you have anything good to report?

Anonymous said...

"Don't feel bad about the chin trashing Jake some more, he didn't learn anything from reeking and deserves to be trashed."

ITA. Jake was a bad idea and if Reese didn't dump him, Jake would still be following her around and doing photo ops with her. And an entire year after Reeke ended, Jake starts an extremely fake showmance with an overgrown 16 year old. It looked as though he might have gotten a clue when the showmance ended after 2 months, but his recent trip to Nashville shows that Jake is still stupid. He's just asking for all of the criticism and ridicule he's getting and will continue to get.

Anonymous said...

Jake was a bad idea

Sorry, should be Reeke was a bad idea

Anonymous said...

Jake dumped Reese The Beard.

Anonymous said...

He's just asking for all of the criticism and ridicule he's getting and will continue to get.

1. Jake's desperate for straight image / money / fame?
2. Jake doesn't see anything wrong with acting like a fool and looking pathetic in tabloid stories?

WTF??? said...

At the Harps grocery store in Mountain Home, Arkansas, Jennifer Huddleston spotted the cover of Us Weekly — the one with Elton John and David Furnish and their newborn son Zachary — covered up like a common porn rag:

Queerty

Anonymous said...

Jake dumped Reese The Beard.

Can we please not start that argument again :). No one knows for sure. You have your opinion, others have theirs.

Anonymous said...

I have my opinion and arguments - Jake dumped the beard.

Anonymous said...

Why are you so upset with Jake? Very bitter.

come on, you don't know by now?
the person is mad with Jake because he has not come out and make a statement that he's gay and drape himself in the rainbow flag.

So every woman Jake's around will be considered a beard. He's a fame whore, rediculous and has no career. Oh, but all of this would change for some of the tunnel vision posters if he would appear on Glee holding hands with Austin N.

They love Jake and desparately want him to be gay and that's all thats matter. Not realizng he may be other. They don't care because he's Hot and could be a role model.

So since he's not doing what they want or think he should be doing, they will continue to tear him down and criticize his every move.

They talked about Reese(too old) now it's Taylor (too young).
The woman will never be right for them because it's not what they want him to do.
If it was someone like Scarlett J., they would find more trash to talk about. SAD really

Jake said...

At the Harps grocery store in Mountain Home, Arkansas, Jennifer Huddleston spotted the cover of Us Weekly — the one with Elton John and David Furnish and their newborn son Zachary — covered up like a common porn rag

American people love my Us Weekly covers!

Anonymous said...

SAD really.

Your stupidity and ignorance is sad. Or is that just your pretending you don't see Jake's gayness and bearding? I bet it is.

Anonymous said...

Ted said Reese dumped Jake, she had no use for him anymore, he had no reason to dump her.

Anonymous said...

Jake dumped Reese just before Brothers promotion. Jake stayed in NYC during Thanksgiving. Reese would never ever miss all those great holidays photo ops, she would use them and dump Jake 4 weeks later.

Anonymous said...

And let's not forget that Reese was the one who visited Jake in NYC. Or that yogurt photo op, lol.

Hollywood Life said...

Jake Gyllenhaal Begs Taylor Swift For Forgiveness After Flirting With Camilla Belle!
Jake reportedly drove 200 miles to Nashville to win Taylor back face-to-face after realizing he behaved like a jerk!
We already told you that exes Jake Gyllenhaal, 29, and Taylor Swift, 21, had a secret rendezvous in Nashville, Tenn., on Jan. 19 — but a new report from In Touch magazine reveals why! According to a source close to the couple, Taylor was heartbroken after seeing photos of Jake flirting with Joe Jonas‘ ex-girlfriend Camilla Belle, and it made Jake realize the error of his ways. The source says Jake was so determined to see Taylor that he drove 200 miles to Nashville in a rental car when his connecting flight from Memphis was delayed!
“He didn’t want to stand her up,” the source tells the mag. “It was like a romantic movie.”
As much as we’d all like to believe Jake and Taylor are just another Hollywood showmance — and I’m still not totally convinced — it’s beginning to sound like the real deal. Considering all of Taylor’s songs are about finding her knight in shining armor, Jake might just be the one to give her the fairytale ending she’s been dreaming of.
Would YOU take Jake back if you were Taylor Swift?
-Yes! He obviously really likes her. 49.02%
-No, he flirted with her ex's ex! That's a deal breaker. 48.04%

Hollywood Life

In Touch said...

Taylor takes Jake back!
Despite breaking her heart and humiliating her, Taylor Swift forgives Jake Gyllenhaal — and invites him to her Nashville home for a sleepover.

InTouchWeekly

Anonymous said...

There seems to be less photo-ops with Jim. It could be because he isn't an actor or that Jake and his PR was the one's behind all the photo-ops. Look at the crap going back to Kiki along with the tabloid crap, it's the same shit and there is one common thred: Jake.

One thing I do agree with, Jake is immature.

Anonymous said...

Jake Gyllenhaal Begs Taylor Swift For Forgiveness After Flirting With Camilla Belle!

LMAO! Bonnie Fuller is insane :)

Anonymous said...

There seems to be less photo-ops with Jim.

No one gives a shit about some CAA agent.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 400 of 3120   Newer› Newest»