Saturday, 24 April 2010

Something Magical

Jake Gyllenhaal talks about Heath Ledger, Brokeback Mountain and magical time in his life.

***

Between courses at the Ravagh Persian Grill in Manhattan (his choice), he pulls out from under his T-shirt the two chains that hang around his neck. Each has a ring at its end - one is a black diamond, the other a pendant of Saint Genesius, patron saint of actors - and he starts rolling them between his fingers. But he almost seems alarmed when I ask about them, as though he hasn't been aware of what he has been doing. A diner from another table comes over.
"Can I say hi to you?" she asks.
"Yes, you can," he says.
"Oh, my gosh," she says. "You're my favorite."
"Oh no," he says. "Oh, don't say that. You say that to everybody."
"No!" she protests. "I love The Brokenback Mountain. I really did love it. I watched it three times."

Brokenback Mountain. Once she recedes, he turns to me and says, "You don't want to know the variations of that title." He tells me how, just the other day, a lawyer asked him how he got into acting at such a young age. "I think at first I was just ambitious," he says. "It was blind ambition. I wanted to be out there. I mean, I remember watching my sister up onstage doing South Pacific when we were kids and going, 'That looks like a fucking lot of fun.'" He debates with himself. "Was it attention? Probably, but I think it was more the magic. It's magic, some of what happens in movies. I mean, people asked me many times through the experience of Brokeback Mountain what that was like. And the best way I can describe it is what we all carry with ourselves from that experience, and why we feel so close. Forget all the awards that come, with people kind of adorning each other - it wasn't about that. There was something magical in that time. We all slept in our trailers out by a trailer park the first month of making that movie. I was sleeping next to Ang's trailer; Ang's trailer was next to Heath and Michelle's trailer - they'd kind of moved in together. And Michael Hausman, the producer, brought his Airstream trailer down. And it was just us, by this river, for a month. And we would walk to set, and we would eat together, and we would all make coffee in the morning, and I would wake up in the morning and there would be Ang Lee doing Tai Chi outside of my trailer, and it was just magical. It was just magical."

Jake and Heath on Brokeback Mountain set
To promote the movie, the cast appeared together on Oprah. For the first half of the show, it was just Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger fending off Winfrey's enthusiasm and curiosity. There is a sheen cast over the movie now - to some extent because of its subject matter but mostly because of Ledger's death - that leaves it and anything connected to it frozen, untouchable. So rewatching the two actors on Oprah, I was surprised to see Gyllenhaal alluding to times that the two of them didn't get on during the filming. Gyllenhaal seems surprised, too, when I mention this, as if he wasn't aware this was something he'd shared. But he remembers. The scene with the two of them by the river, for instance.

"Where Heath's character goes into how his father knew of two guys who lived together and he ended up seeing them killed and dead. I had always read it in a certain way. I heard it in my mind a certain way. And I had worked with these incredible actors like Dustin Hoffman and Susan Sarandon. When I worked with Dustin, he would always do things to me; in between a take, he would stop his lines, and he'd be like, 'You're a wonderful person,' or horrible things sometimes to jar me... getting a different response. And so I decided in this scene to gather the gumption" - this was when Ledger's part of the scene was being filmed and Gyllenhaal was off-camera - "and I don't subscribe to this really, changing lines on an actor, because I don't think I'm Dustin Hoffman, and I don't think I have the ability or the talent to do that to somebody. But I do think that changing intention sometimes on an actor when you're doing a scene when you're not on-camera is really interesting for them. But I did it at one point in this one scene, and I'd always heard it a certain way, so I was almost trying to move the scene to that place for him. He delivered the whole thing very, very straight, and he could feel me trying to do that, and I remember him getting really upset with me. And I remember him turning to Ang at the end of it and going, 'If he wants to tell me what to do, have him tell you'... We had these kind of exchanges, you know. But ultimately, the way I look at it was I was wrong, because he was brilliant. But at the same time I think, "Well, if I hadn't, would it have gone a certain way?" We balanced each other out. When I think about these things that happened then, we were very much alive in that movie. We were really living that movie. Not literally, but you think about those times in your life..."

One thing Gyllenhaal would do - feeding off the way Ledger had chosen to play the part of Ennis quietly, his teeth clenched - was to ask him in character, "What? What'd you say?" "Stupid me," Gyllenhaal comments now.

Did Heath never do anything that annoyed you?

"No. I always admired Heath. I always was kind of enamored by him, you know. I mean, yeah, sometimes it was hard to sit with him. He moved... He was a mover."

People have since suggested that he was really, really troubled by having to do all that promotion and campaigning. Was that your sense?

"Yeah. He was very sensitive. He didn't always really have a sense of performance in his everyday life. He was who he was. I think actors very often, they know how to present something, and that's part of their job. I think he was just really sensitive. We often used to do a lot of things together, because people were very interested in him and I think we felt safe together."

For example, he says that when he and Ledger had to introduce Ang Lee at the Directors Guild awards, Ledger refused point-blank to say anything jokey about Lee, as might have been expected at such an event. Their introduction was consequently so serious and earnest, says Gyllenhaal, that when Lee came up to the stage, he told them, "That was so gay."

Still, he also remembers how much they'd be laughing backstage at events: "For such a serious actor as Heath was, he was crazy funny. Dark funny, but funny." Out front, they came to be sobered by people's reactions, as they realized that the movie was bigger than all of them, bigger than they'd realized. Gyllenhaal tells me a strange thing about the filming, an experience he'd just rhapsodized about as so magical: "In retrospect, it just was a painful process." As though there's no reason why both memories should not be equally true. "I don't think any of us can watch it to this day," he says. "I remember talking to Michelle very recently and her being like, 'I didn't know if it was any good or not.'"

Afterward, he and Ledger stayed in close touch. "We'd talk a few times a month. I mean, he was a friend. He was like my creative partner." The news of Ledger's death came while Gyllenhaal was filming Brothers.

Could you make any sense of it at all?

A lengthy pause. "I don't really like talking about it. That period of time was... It was difficult."

What effect do you think it had on you?

"Even when we did Brokeback and stuff, it was like my work was the only thing that mattered to me. It was like I could only understand or define myself through doing that. Life, I didn't totally understand. And I think I was afraid of life. And I had success in my work, enough success that you could keep going back there. But after that happened... I think I recognized that it was work. And I recognized that this is for real."

"This" being life?

"It's for real."

What were you scared of?

"It seems to me that there are some people who go, 'All right, I'm grabbing the bull by the horns. Let's do this...,' and there are some people who it takes a while to figure out. It's an everyday struggle to be able to go, 'I'm going to follow my own instincts - I'm going to try and hear my own heart regardless...' We're getting pretty deep here. I mean, there are things that I want in my life. You can hide in your work, I guess I'm saying, or you can be alive and free and live in your work. You can pretend the people that you're going to work with for however many months are going to be the family that's going to be forever. But the truth is, they're not. And no matter what relationships you make along the way - which have been occasionally really, really influential in my life – ultimately I choose all the mishegoss, and all the complication and confusions of life, which takes courage and patience to sift through. Over the temporary moment of 'Oh, I'm comforted in the womb of this family.' I choose the other. I hate to say this, but - "Gyllenhaal smiles - "it's time to jump."

***

There is a famous scene in Brokeback Mountain where Ledger's and Gyllenhaal's characters jump together off a cliff into a river, both of them naked.

In reality, Ledger made the jump but Gyllenhaal did not. Originally the leap was to have been from a lower ledge, but Ledger wanted to go from right at the top. They were told how careful they would have to be, falling from that height, because they might hit the river's shallow bottom, and they were also warned of the hazards presented by the glacial water. Gyllenhaal realized he wasn't so sure about it. He had just been cast in Jarhead, and that shoot was starting soon. He knew that if he injured himself, he would lose the part. And he was comforted by a precedent: he remembered a story he had heard in his youth, about how Paul Newman, a family friend, hadn't actually made the leap in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. He decided to let a stand-in jump in his stead.

Brokeback Mountain shirts
I ask him whether Ledger didn't, after all they had been through together, say to him, "You're wimping out on this?"

"It's interesting - he never did say that. I would have loved for him to have said that."

Would it have made you feel bad?

"Maybe. Yeah, probably. But I was actually really, really proud of myself that I didn't do it. For me, it was a great triumph. You know, there's a pressure that people put on themselves to not trust their instincts. You know, show the stunt guys I can do it, prove it to this person, prove it to that person. Who do I need to prove it to? And Heath didn't do it for any of those reasons - he did it because he wanted to jump."

Do you at all regret not doing it now?

"Yeah. But that's me now."

***

Source: GQ, May 2010 - interviewed by Chris Heath

2,745 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   1201 – 1400 of 2745   Newer›   Newest»
Ricky Martin Hits Billboard Latin Music Awards said...

Ricky Martin takes the stage at the 2010 Billboard Latin Music Awards at Coliseo de Puerto Rico José Miguel Agrelot on Thursday (April 29) in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

The is one of the first public appearances the 38-year-old singing sensation has made since publicly revealing that he’s gay (he received a standing ovation when he walked on stage).

During the ceremony, Ricky denounced the recent passing of a new Arizona Immigration Law, which allows local and state law enforcement to use racial and ethnic cues to profile individuals.

“It makes no sense,” Ricky said. “”Long live love, long live peace.”

Just Jared

Anonymous said...

Awwwwww, Ricky, awwww.... :)

Summer Movie Preview Pt 1: Ken, Cannes and Carrie (Bradshaw) said...

...
THE CHAMP: Robert Downey Jr returns as Tony Stark in Iron Man 2. Even if the early bad buzz becomes consensus, it'll undoubtedly obliterate the box office competition. Most of the negativity in early reviews involves too many characters and an unwieldy plot. One wonders why Hollywood never learns this sequel crippling lesson. Spider-Man 2 and The Dark Knight, both massive successes critically and commercially, practically handed filmmakers a guidebook on how to do it properly and they just keep making Spider-Man 3 and Batman Forever type "more is more!" choices anyway.

DIVA: Carrie, Miranda, Samantha and Charlotte return (and in that order thank you) for Sex & The City 2. We hope that the fifth girl (Manhattan) is more involved than she seems to be with the 'let's vacation in Abu Dhabi' plotline. Bonus Points: as if Sarah Jessica Parker wasn't diva enough for one film... Liza Minnelli cameos!!!

THE PRESTIGE: The world's most famous film festival holds courts for two weeks in Cannes as world cinema greats gather. Ridley Scott's Gladiator, excuse me, Robin Hood opens the festival. Here's the complete lineup

WHERE THE BOYS ARE: Jake Gyllenhaal lets down his hair (or weave, whatever) to roll around in the Sand(s of time) in the first installment of the potential franchise, Prince of Persia. Do you miss Jake or have you recovered from that long bout of Gyllenhaalism?
...

Towleroad

Anonymous said...

Do you miss Jake or have you recovered from that long bout of Gyllenhaalism?

Who wants to be cured? ;)

Anonymous said...

Do you miss Jake or have you recovered from that long bout of Gyllenhaalism?
Who wants to be cured? ;)


Hmmm.. I guess I don't feel like I need to be cured of anything. I like Jake and think he's basically a good guy - but he's going to have to be a lot less actively deceitful and willfully manipulative in order for him to have my respect. Blue eyes and good looks don't make up for the bullshit, imo.

Anonymous said...

Happy Birthday, Kiki Dunst! :)

Anonymous said...

Maybe it's like saying "Let's have a baby when we can afford it." If you wait until you can afford it, you'll never have children.
What do you mean by 'afford it'?


I'm not the original poster - but here's how I read that: It's very common for people to delay taking action or doing things we want until all the conditions are "perfect." We might say that we'll go on that dream vacation when the kids are out of the house, or we'll go back to college someday when we are more settled, etc. And, in reality, there's always something to keep us from doing the things we want. So sometimes people decide to just go for it because they know conditions will never be "perfect" and then we'll never end up doing what we really want.

Anonymous said...

12:32 PM, I can understand that, but we are talking about one very privileged 25 years young guy who whanted to have a baby with his boyfriend. What's the rush? So after all the trouble they don't care enough to spend more time together and raise the baby?

Anonymous said...

12:32 PM, I can understand that, but we are talking about one very privileged 25 years young guy who whanted to have a baby with his boyfriend. What's the rush? So after all the trouble they don't care enough to spend more time together and raise the baby?

Well, I was just giving my take on what the original poster said and I was speaking in general terms. I'm not actually a BT believer, so I can't really address that.

Ted said...

Hottie Jake Gyllenhaal sure does know how to stir it up on the Montreal set of his latest flick, Source Code. But guess what he's pullin' now? Apparently, stuff to make your eyes either roll—or bulge—in utter delight. Not sure how this one will hit ya.

Seems like one vintage pair of exes can be still be sexy friends:

We hear Kiki was in town visiting Jakey!

Yep, the two former lovebirds, Gyllenhaal and Kirsten Dunst, were spotted hanging out again, thanks to their synchronizing work schedules.

Sorry, but we find this to be terribly good news. See, before those mundane coffee dates with Reese Witherspoon, Jake was all about lovey-dovey lunches at Joan's on Third with Kiki. Everybody knows it was hardly just a latte affair.

But don't get too excited just yet: We're told things hardly heated up in Canada, just that the two exes were hanging together. Still think it's supersweet.

Jake has been up in Montreal filming Source Code where Dunst was in town, prior to heading to the Tribeca Film Festival, where we must say, she's been looking fab.

Sources tell us Jake and Kirsten casually ran into each other a few times while they were out, and then possibly made it a more purposeful bump-in later on.

They seem to be on totally good terms. Unlike J & Reese.

Was Jake's Run-In With an Ex Hot—or So Not?

Anonymous said...

Huh?

Anonymous said...

^^Well, besides being pointless, it's also old news. Did Ted just need to fill space or what? Unless he's trying to reinforce his earlier Bitch Back comment that Reese is a phony bitch and J&R's showmance ended badly, which we already knew.

Anonymous said...

Well, besides being pointless, it's also old news.

That's not old news - that's fiction.

OT said...

OT from 5:27 AM - I know this is a blog to chat about TT, but I'd appreciate an advice. I have been friends with someone for a couple of years, more off than on. A few days ago I told her that I'll probably go out on a date with some guy and from that day on she seemed so different. Always incredibly mean and insulting to me, I tried to ignore it and not start a fight until today where she really pissed me off. She was literally verabally abusive. I told her off and she was like "that's your thank you after what I did for you". Yes, she did me an important favour once (I didn't ask her for it though). I told her I'd pay her back, but she said that I can never do that and that it was her time that was wasted for helping me. I was speechless and then she has the nerve to tell me, she'll call again. WTF? I know she doesn't have many friends, just very few actually and with most people she fights very easily, but I thought we got along pretty fine, because I'm a person who tries very hard to avoid fighting and tries to be very easy going.
Now, this person has my address and phone number and I'm uneasy about it.
She scares me, honestly. Any advices what I should do?

(Sorry if my English maybe too good.)

And sorry for being OT.

Anonymous said...

^^...isn't too good...

Anonymous said...

2:19 PM, are you affraid of her, do you think she could do something to harm you?

Anonymous said...

That's not old news - that's fiction.

Which part is fiction? I don't think they're "getting back together" (but it doesn't say that they are). But clearly they were both in Montreal at the same time and ran into each other at restaurants, etc. That part isn't in dispute.

Anonymous said...

2:19 PM, are you affraid of her, do you think she could do something to harm you?

I really don't know. But she behaved like a psycho in the last couple of days. I'm kind of scared to see her name show up on my mobile phone when it rings.

Jeez, why do some people have to be so wacko? :(

Anonymous said...

Maybe Ted's latest re Jake and Kiki is his contribution to the "Jake is straight" POP month campaign (on orders of e!)

Anonymous said...

Is she interested in this guy as well?? Why would she be mean to you because you're dating this guy (unless she's jealous)?

2:35 PM said...

This crazy behaviour is on for days now. She probaby expects me to endure, because of that one favour I didn't even ask for.
I think I'm really dump, I can't judge people. :(

Anonymous said...

Is she interested in this guy as well?? Why would she be mean to you because you're dating this guy (unless she's jealous)?

I was thinking the same. I know she had a lover who left her recently for someone else. But it was nothing serious, as far as I know, just a friend with benefits, you know?

Anonymous said...

Which part is fiction?

* We hear Kiki was in town visiting Jakey = Kirsten filming in Montreal isn't 'visiting Jakey'

* Gyllenhaal and Kirsten Dunst, were spotted hanging out again = fiction. Being in the same restaurant at the same time is not hanging out together.

* Jake was all about lovey-dovey lunches at Joan's on Third with Kiki = fiction

* Sources tell us Jake and Kirsten casually ran into each other a few times while they were out, and then possibly made it a more purposeful bump-in later on = fiction

* They seem to be on totally good terms = fiction.

2:44 PM said...

To make it short and not bother you guys anymore. Would you pick up the phone the next time she calls and tell her the friendship is over and ask her not to call anymore or not even bother to pick up? That's all I want to know.
(A friend I talked to said she wouldn't pick up the phone.)

Anonymous said...

Tell her the friendship is over, be gentle but firm.

Anonymous said...

Tell her the friendship is over, be gentle but firm.

That's probably more fair than simply not picking up the phone. I'm nervous about it, but I think I'll do it. (I just hope she won't go ballistic.)
Thanks.

Anonymous said...

No, it's better to do this: when she calls say you're busy (on another call, going into a meeting, etc.), and say you'll call her back, but don't. If she calls you again, say you're on your way out the door, whatever, tell her you'll call her back but - you guessed it - don't. Remain friendly, nice but don't call her again. She'll get the hint. And while she might complain to others about you not calling her, she can't argue that you weren't pleasant and she certainly can't present a counterargument on why you should do this or do that or stay friends, because you aren't in contact with her.

Anonymous said...

Thanks 3:08 PM. So, basically in any case I should remain friendly? I will. (I don't want to piss her off more anyway).

Anonymous said...

2:55, I don't think anyone can tell from some tweets exactly what happened. I don't know if they're on good terms or not - it's possible they made some kind of peace. And they did used to have lovey dovey lunches in public (whether you think they were fake or not is another matter). But I do think Ted is using his usual doublespeak because he says:

But don't get too excited just yet: We're told things hardly heated up in Canada, just that the two exes were hanging together. and Sources tell us Jake and Kirsten casually ran into each other a few times while they were out, and possibly... - which sounds to me like he was being coy with the remark about Kiki "visiting" Jake and didn't mean it literally. When you read the whole thing together, he makes it sound like nothing really happened - which is why the whole post is kind of pointless.

Anonymous said...

Was Jake's Run-In With an Ex Hot—or So Not?

Jakey Jakey Jakey. Please don't wear brown and green together again. You look like a tree. (tbh I've made that mistake too)

Anonymous said...

3:16, yes. Nice (not necessarily friendly, though) but distant. That way you don't give her any ammunition to get mad/ballistic (like by saying you don't want to be friends anymore) but at the same time you're not letting her into your life either. Good luck.

Anonymous said...

I don't know if they're on good terms or not

Last November or December Kirsten said in an interview that she's not in touch with Jake.

Anonymous said...

Good luck.

Thanks. I need that.

Anonymous said...

(((3:30 PM)))

And good luck with that date ;)

Anonymous said...

(((3:30 PM)))

And good luck with that date ;)


Aww. Thanks. :)

green Jake said...

Even though climate legislation is stalled in Congress, the business of voluntary carbon offsets is thriving, thanks to the abundant guilt and concern of the world's most wasteful consumers. Not only does Al Gore pay to counteract his heat-trapping gases; so do Hillary Clinton, Arnold Schwarzenegger and high-profile gatherings including the Oscars. Companies have formed mostly in the United States, Europe and Canada to sell the notional product that is offsets. Now it seems easy for celebrities, businesses and regular consumers to neutralize the damage from burning electricity, hopping a plane or hitting the highway.
...
Offset companies' web pages typically feature photos of deep blue skies, towering windmills and banks of resplendent solar panels — the antithesis of pollution. On its site, the trusted Swiss offsetter Myclimate reassuringly tenders "climate protection." Among its clients the company counts Coca-Cola, Ben & Jerry's, Unilever and Virgin Atlantic. Another big offset player, The CarbonNeutral Company, has serviced the likes of Brad Pitt and the Rolling Stones, Coldplay, Jake Gyllenhaal and Sky, the UK-based television and communications firm. The CarbonNeutral Company posits that settling one's carbon debt is relatively simple. Its site states the CO2 offsetting promise: "Buying one tonne of carbon offsets means there will be one less tonne of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than there would otherwise have been." Paying to restore carbon balance, an act of consumption itself, signals that we can keep consuming and save the planet.
...

Offset Buyers Beware

Anonymous said...

Last November or December Kirsten said in an interview that she's not in touch with Jake.

Okay. But that was before Montreal, right? Life is fluid, stuff happens. Look, I'm not shipping them and I believe they didn't stay in touch, but maybe when they ran into each other they cleared the air a bit, who knows? And they probably won't 'stay in touch' after Montreal. In any case, Reese is purposely trying to put Jake down with her bitchy PR bullshit, which Ted alludes to.

Anonymous said...

There are few tweets and reports (or "reports", who knows) about Jake and Kirsten ignoring each other in Montreal. That makes sense. Jake and Kirsten live in LA, they didn't talk for 4 years, there is no reason to believe that visiting the same restaurant in Montreal could fix anything.

Anonymous said...

There are few tweets and reports (or "reports", who knows) about Jake and Kirsten ignoring each other in Montreal. That makes sense. Jake and Kirsten live in LA, they didn't talk for 4 years, there is no reason to believe that visiting the same restaurant in Montreal could fix anything.

LOL. Fine. I don't know how reliable "tweets" or "reports" are. It doesn't matter one way or another, you know? It's all just speculation anyway and I don't think anyone is saying there's some kind of romance brewing again, so it's all pretty meaningless - and as I said orginally - pointless.

Anonymous said...

It doesn't matter one way or another, you know?

It doesn't. The question remains - why the hell is Ted writing Jake and Kirsten fiction?

Anyone But Kagan said...

"Jake Gyllenhaal lets down his hair (or weave, whatever)"

That wasn't very nice. ;)

Solo Celebrity Adoptions said...

Sandra Bullock surprised fans when she announced she adopted a baby boy from New Orleans in January. From Ricky Martin to Gloria Swanson, VIEW OUR GALLERY of other celebrities who have adopted children and braved the task of raising them alone.

Sandra Bullock is the picture of anything but the betrayed wife on the cover of People, smiling and holding her surprise newly adopted son, Louis, high above her head on the magazine’s glossy cover. The Academy Award-winning actress shocked the world with her 3 1/2-month-old baby boy from New Orleans, for whom she waited four years. Although her allegedly cheating husband Jesse James is no longer in the picture—Bullock announced her divorce on Wednesday in addition to the adoption news—the 45-year-old actress is still overjoyed to be a new mom. The Blind Side star’s story is eerily similar to that of Angelina Jolie, who announced her adoption of now 8-year-old Maddox shortly after her separation from Billy Bob Thornton. But other celebrities’ single-parent adoption situations stemmed from a wide-range of reasons, whether unintentional (i.e., Sharon Stone) or a second chance at motherhood (i.e., Meg Ryan). From singer Sheryl Crow, who adopted her son after being diagnosed with breast cancer, to pop star Ricky Martin, whose twins inspired him to come out of the closet, VIEW OUR GALLERY of celebrities who have adopted children as single parents.
...

Ricky Martin

Ricky Martin welcomed twins Valentino and Matteo via a surrogate in 2008. Martin, who has described himself as a hands-on parent ("I'm the one who changes the diapers, the one that feeds them, the one that bathes them, the one that puts them to sleep," said the singer), also credited the twins for inspiring his decision to come out of the closet in March. "This is just what I need, especially now that I am the father of two beautiful boys that are so full of light and who with their outlook teach me new things every day," Martin said in a statement. "To keep living as I did up until today would be to indirectly diminish the glow that my kids were born with."

Solo Celebrity Adoptions

Anonymous said...

Perez (sorry!) posted new pictures of Matteo and Valentino.

"Ricky Martin's twin sons Matteo and Valentino had some play time in the park with Ricky's older brother (bodyguard?) and their nanny in Miami the other day."

Ricky Martin's Mini-Mes

Anonymous said...

I'm not going to kick Perez's ass this time :)

Florida Tom said...

Ricky Martin

"To keep living as I did up until today would be to indirectly diminish the glow that my kids were born with."


Oh so true. Oh so true. I admire Ricky Martin very much.

payback said...

LOL it's probably Kirsten who's getting the sites to write "Spiderman star Jake Gyllenhaal..."

Jake said...

Fuck!

Florida Tom said...

Anonymous said...
Do you miss Jake or have you recovered from that long bout of Gyllenhaalism?
Who wants to be cured? ;)

Hmmm.. I guess I don't feel like I need to be cured of anything. I like Jake and think he's basically a good guy - but he's going to have to be a lot less actively deceitful and willfully manipulative in order for him to have my respect. Blue eyes and good looks don't make up for the bullshit, imo



ITA. Jake is most likely a good guy. But his deceit certainly makes you question this.

I also agree with the comment the possibility of Jake hiding a child is not to protect the child but is to protect himself. Ditto for Austin. It is just plain wrong.It was also nice to finally hear Jake talk about Heath but I am wondering if that was done out of love or to bring back some of his BBM fans who have deserted him just in time for PoP. I hope the latter is true.

Anonymous said...

Mmm don't you mean "former" ?

Anonymous said...

or to bring back some of his BBM fans

Tom, I'm sure you don't really despise Jake like that.

Gareth Thomas said...

Rugby star Gareth Thomas in Sports Illustrated: ‘People keep asking, ‘What’s the negative of coming out?’ But there’s none so far.”

It’s wonderful when someone high-profile comes out and a dream come true when the person is as articulate as Welsh rugby star Gareth Thomas who talks about his three-year coming out process in a profile just published in Sports Illustrated.

Here’s the part that I found to be the most moving because it’s about what happened to his life after he chose honesty:

“It’s like waking up on Christmas Day, walking down the stairs and seeing Father Christmas,” he says. “The horizons are wide open. I’m like a teenager again. People keep asking, ‘What’s the negative of coming out?’ But there’s none so far. …”

I would love to help kids who are going through this, because we’re all kids. I want to be the gay role model I never had. The note I got from a guy who gave up rugby years ago because he was gay and has returned to playing it since I came out—that outweighs lifting the biggest trophy as captain of Wales.

“The e-mails and letters and Twitters I get tell me there is so much confusion, so many gay kids who love sports but get pushed away. A lot of the notes are from America. I love the United States, … but why wouldn’t the people who run your sports and who sponsor them make a public announcement that they welcome gay people and will support them? Because even if they feel that’s bringing too much attention to something that should be a private matter, at this point that’s what’s needed.”

Greg in Hollywood

Florida Tom said...

Anon 707 I dont despise Jake. I just totally confused about who he is. If he is indeed in a committed relationship with austin and they have a child then I do despise what they are doing. Its all about their careers.

I have always said I am not the biggest Jake fan in the world. I just really believed he would come out after Brokeback and thought that would be fantastic. I am not sure if he was toying with us or he was thnking about coming out. I am just extremely dissappointed.

Florida Tom said...

Wow beautiful comments from Gareth Thomas. Thats why I follow all this. I still hope Jake shows the courage of Ricky and Gareth. I wont give up on that happening.

Anonymous said...

If he is indeed in a committed relationship with austin and they have a child then I do despise what they are doing. Its all about their careers.

But if there is BT, then love is the only reason for her/his existence.

Anonymous said...

LOL. her/his existence may be about love.

But the hidden existence is all about the closet & their careers.

Florida Tom said...

Anonymous said...
If he is indeed in a committed relationship with austin and they have a child then I do despise what they are doing. Its all about their careers.

But if there is BT, then love is the only reason for her/his existence.



I agree with that but just read what Ricky said above. It was very touching and I cant understand how that wouldnt touch you.

Anonymous said...

her/his existence may be about love

MAY??? Gays are using surrogate mothers to have kids when they have nothing better to do with their spare time?

8:12 PM said...

I agree with that but just read what Ricky said above.

Ricky is one of the reasons I'm sceptical about BT.

Anonymous said...

Very nice about Gareth Thomas. All the best to him. :)

Anonymous said...

It was also nice to finally hear Jake talk about Heath but I am wondering if that was done out of love or to bring back some of his BBM fans who have deserted him just in time for PoP. I hope the latter is true.

You hope the latter is true, really? Wow!

Anonymous said...

Trolly, stop nitpicking

Anonymous said...

Trolly? LOL Buzz off, idiot.

Anonymous said...

Idiot? LOL Buzz off, trolly.

Anonymous said...

Yes, you are an idiot for calling regulars trolls. What the FUCK is trollish about my comment?

OT WTF?!? said...

The state of Oklahoma just decided, and by an appallingly high margin I might add, that a doctor is protected from being sued if he or she chooses not to tell a woman that the baby she is carrying has a birth defect.

Under this new law, a doctor may withhold information, mislead or even blatantly lie to a pregnant woman and her partner about the health of their baby if the doctor so much as thinks that fetal test results would cause a woman to consider abortion.

CNN

Florida Tom said...

Anonymous said...
It was also nice to finally hear Jake talk about Heath but I am wondering if that was done out of love or to bring back some of his BBM fans who have deserted him just in time for PoP. I hope the latter is true.

You hope the latter is true, really? Wow!

To make it clear I meant that I hope Jake made his statement out of loved for Heath.

Anonymous said...

You can't withhold health information from a woman. What is up with that???? :( That can't be be constitutional.

Roe v. Wade in part:

In the first trimester, the state cannot restrict a woman's right to an abortion in any way. The [Supreme Court] stated that this trimester begins at conception and ends at the "point at which the fetus becomes 'viable'".

Anonymous said...

slightly_askew: Oh. Jake Gyllenhaal will be on Jonathan Ross the same night as Adam next week. It airs one week delayed on BBC America (5/14).
8 minutes ago

Anonymous said...

TMZ says Sandra Bullock would put out her trash right before garbage pickup because if anyone stood next to the can they'd smell dirty diapers. Also there's a photo taken right after the Oscars in which she's taking baby clothes into her home. Exactly why they're pointing out their errors is still unclear.

destiny said...

I agree that Ted's answer about Sandra and Toothy is a statement about why Jake is hiding BT, especially since he's all about the publicity otherwise, also a difference between them.

I don't see how they can continue to hide BT as he gets older. Not only because I think it will be more difficult, but also just really wrong to do with an older kid. I couldn't help thinking about that when reading the stories about Maggie and Ramona visiting Peter down in New Orleans, and taking Ramona to the children's jazz event.

What are Jake and Austin going to do--never do anything with their own child? Send the nanny? Leave him at home as they head out with Maggie and Ramona--something you can do with a baby, but not an older kid. And if the kids presumably spend time together, as BT gets older and really starts to understand he's being treated differently, and hearing about all the things Ramona does with her parents........

Anonymous said...

All this talk as if BT is real.

Anonymous said...

I am wondering if that was done out of love or to bring back some of his BBM fans

I hope the latter is true.



To make it clear I meant that I hope Jake made his statement out of loved for Heath.



Tom with all due respect "latter" means the last choice you listed, i.e. to bring back some of his BBM fans. You made the mistake of saying "latter" when you actually meant "former" that is, done out of love. That's why everyone was taken aback. It would ~very nice~ if you could apologize for the error and the confusion it caused.

Anonymous said...

she's taking baby clothes into her home.

It's not Sandra; it's a photographer taking in a baby blanket and baby clothes, the same woman photog who did the People cover. It's presumed that the pap pic was taken the same day she shot the cover. Idky about TMZ either; they say the hints were there but they didn't publish the baby clothes or the trash bin pics to begin with. Maybe they're just being honest that they missed the clues?

Btw did anyone ever send TMZ the BT baby footprint pics (especially the one that's a reverse negative that really shows it) or the wedding ring peeking out from Jake's shirt pic? LOL not that they would do anything about it. But maybe someone should send them, especially now with the SB baby oversight.

Anonymous said...

TMZ will never out Jake. Better to send it to the National Enquirer.

Anonymous said...

Send it to both. Shit, send it to everyone.

BT said...

Yesssssssss!!!!!~

Jake said...

Noooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

How many people think BT is real? Could we take a count? (Providing that anyone wants the truth and thus votes only once.)
I for one don't believe in BT.

Anonymous said...

I believe in BT.

Anonymous said...

I think it's possible that there is a BT.

Anonymous said...

No hubby Austin or rugrat

Anonymous said...

There is no BT, believing in this is stupid.

Anonymous said...

IF there is a BT, Austin Nichols is not the other parent, (surrogate-mother and egg donor set aside too, of course) in my humble opinion.

Anonymous said...

I am not a BT believer. But I'm not going to use words like stupid to describe the people who do or their beliefs. I don't see why that's necessary.

Anonymous said...

No BabyTile.

BT said...

Hi!

lol said...

Glittery_Viki: If I am scorned from having an Adam and Jake Gyllenhaal picture next week I will cut someone.
about 5 hours ago

Poll: Most anticipated abs of summer 2010? said...

It’s Friday. Don’t judge us. Just vote after the jump.

Entertainment Weekly

Anonymous said...

All this talk as if BT is real.

Never say never.

Ted said...

"Dear Ted:
Other than the odd reference here and there, there has been a real drought of gossip on Toothy Tile in the past few months. It seems like forever since we've had a Toothy Blind Vice, clues on his identity or any real news on his current love life. Has Toothy really become that good at hiding his secrets, or are you just growing tired of the whole Toothy-Grey Goose love saga? Any new info you can share?
JA

Dear Update:
Not happy with the same-sex shenanigans of Toothy's D.L. peers? Can't blame you. I do love T2, who, FYI, I would never grow tired of, but as for Toothy and his hubby go, I'm afraid to report they're not only both behaving far too much for my tastes, they're (again) listening far too much to their advisors. Twisted stuff."

Bitch Back

Anonymous said...

I just don't think Ted would make this all up. What's the point lying about TT and GG being married and having a baby?

Anonymous said...

I just don't think Ted would make this all up

Maybe someone fed him some false info? Maybe his "sources" aren't so reliable? idk, just throwing it out there.

Anonymous said...

What's the point lying about TT and GG being married and having a baby?

Not much, but I can't believe something like that just because Ted says so.

Anonymous said...

as for Toothy and his hubby go, I'm afraid to report they're not only both behaving far too much for my tastes, they're (again) listening far too much to their advisors

Advisors are advising bearding with Sophia? What else?

Anonymous said...

Maybe someone fed him some false info? Maybe his "sources" aren't so reliable?

Ted would check and double check something as big as a hidden baby + Ted is talking about BT for years.

Ted also said...

I agree that Ted's answer about Sandra and Toothy is a statement about why Jake is hiding BT, especially since he's all about the publicity otherwise, also a difference between them.

Yes, exactly. Toothy/Jake is ALL about PR and SB isn't. And that is further confirmed with this item in today's Bitch Back (which also has the "Update" on Toothy/Grey Goose with the "JA" and "Twisted" references):

"Dear Ted:
If all the allegations against Jesse James are true—he's a womanizer, a homophobe, a racist, an anti-Semite—how is it possible that Sandy didn't know what kind of man she was married to? It's one thing for her to have been oblivious or to have turned a blind eye to his cheating ways, but surely J.J. would have felt most comfortable using racist slurs around his family—people that he could be himself around without fear of rebuke—and that would have been hard for his wife to ignore. So what's Sandy's story? Did she privately condone his homophobic and racist views? Her timely adoption of a black baby raises my suspicions even more, granted, she managed to keep it hidden from the public for a few months, but the child strikes me as a convenient pawn in the publicity game.
—B

Dear Family Secrets:
People can be über-deceptive—it wouldn't have been too hard for J2 to hide his less than stellar qualities. And you can't blame the babe for falling for a bad boy; it happens to the best of us. But Sandy isn't the type to put up with nonsense. That I can say for sure. You're trying too hard on the PR thing, it's not Bullock's thing."

Bitch Back

Anonymous said...

Ted would check and double check something as big as a hidden baby + Ted is talking about BT for years.

Well, I guess you have a point. It's true that Ted's been around a while and isn't a naive babe in the woods. I don't know - it just seems SO far out there.

Anonymous said...

Yes, it is SO far out there.

Stranger things have happened said...

One reason I think there’s a BT is not just the 2.5 years of Reeke, which suspiciously started up big time during the critical period when BT would have been born, but that Ted could have backed off a long time ago like he did when he admitted two months after his TT baby “announcement” that he was wrong about the family expanding because of adoption. In other words, Ted will admit that the information he received was incorrect. I believe he definitely had inside contacts into Toothy’s inner circle back then. In fact, I think that’s why his Bitch Back and Blind Items about Toothy and Grey Goose are so sparse nowadays i.e., lacking the details that they once did. Toothy probably figured out who was feeding Ted inside info and pulled the plug. Or, his PR did.

January 11, 2007
One Kids ‘R’ us Blind Vice

Congrats are in order! Guess what? I hear our fave hubba-hubba, humpy homo in T-town, Toothy Tile, is seriously considering making things super-domesticated with his equally homosational b-f. And no, I don't mean the gorgeous closeted (albeit permanently, it seems) actor is getting a new puppy or Cuisinart.

Hear ol' T2 is thinking about helping his man-friend adopt something, uh, more...complex. As in a human (aren't we all?). Meaning, a baby! Too sweet!

March 16, 2007
Stork Stirrings

Since it's Blind Friday, thought I'd also give you the latest on Toothy Tile. Hear he's not really planning on adopting a kiddo, as I previously broke a few weeks ago. Nope. I was—gasp!—wrong.

Turns out T2, so blab our mutual amigos, plans on swirling up his love juice, right alongside his boyfriend's procreating protein, ya know, putting it in some kinda beaker or toaster, or something, and mixing it around with a donor's eggs, then putting the results into yet another donor to carry the resulting embryo.

The plan is, Boyfriend Tile will then, legally (and far, far away from pokin' press types like yours truly) be listed as papa—when, in fact, our beloved Tooth just may be the correct daddio.

Anonymous said...

I don't say Jake and Austin are the most amazing parents, I only say that I think they created this little person who they are hiding and maybe not spending as much time with as they probably should. I think the nanny spends the most time with it, like a mother actually. JMO.

Davide Bo said...

I still believe Bt is fiction. Ted write a book.

Anonymous said...

I agree and that is most important reason why I don't believe in BT - having a baby because you want that badly and then not spending time with the baby simply doesn't make sense to me.

Anonymous said...

Remember when Jake got Boo right after baby M. was born? Please, it's too obvious he wanted kids. I think Boo was his baby substitute. So, I don't think it's so far fetched what Ted said.

Anonymous said...

Hi DaviB! :)

Anonymous said...

Jake held Boo like a baby

Cute!

Anonymous said...

Please, it's too obvious he wanted kids.

So, for example, Jake decided to do Nailed instead of staying in LA and be with his baby and Austin?

Anonymous said...

So, for example, Jake decided to do Nailed instead of staying in LA and be with his baby and Austin?

Al Gore's daughter co wrote the script and she wanted Jake for the role and DOR is a great director to work with. Many actors and actresses work almost immediately after the baby. Naomi Watts did Mother and Child right after giving birth, she was paped naked on set and she still had a post pregnancy pootch belly. And that woman wanted kids for years.

Anonymous said...

I agree and that is most important reason why I don't believe in BT - having a baby because you want that badly and then not spending time with the baby simply doesn't make sense to me.

I'm not a BT believer - but that's not why. People do what you've described all the time - especially celebs. For them, there is nothing unusual about having nannies do most of the caretaking. Most of the rich and famous live in a different world from the rest of us, so what doesn't make sense to us makes perfect sense to them.

Anonymous said...

Many actors and actresses work almost immediately after the baby.

Those actors and actresses can keep their baby on the set, can spend every free moment with the baby - Jake couldn't do that.

Anonymous said...

That was my second fave BI - the swirling love juices of TT & GG. My first fave was, of course, the first one, hand-holding at the restaurant. :)

Anonymous said...

Remember when Jake got Boo right after baby M. was born? Please, it's too obvious he wanted kids. I think Boo was his baby substitute. So, I don't think it's so far fetched what Ted said.

LOL, do you hear yourself? Do you even realize the difference between a dog and a human being?

Anonymous said...

Most of the rich and famous live in a different world from the rest of us, so what doesn't make sense to us makes perfect sense to them.

Celebrities live in the same world when it comes to kids, they are just humans. Read what Maggie or Ricky have to say about parenting.

Anonymous said...

LOL, do you hear yourself? Do you even realize the difference between a dog and a human being?

Jake obviously realized the differnce hence him and Austin making a real baby.

Anonymous said...

LOL, do you hear yourself? Do you even realize the difference between a dog and a human being?

Please don't insult the dogs, comparing them to humans.

Anonymous said...

Please don't insult the dogs, comparing them to humans.

Couldn't agree more.

Davide Bo said...

@Anonymous May 01, 2010 11:06 AM
Hi! Sorry for my poor english :)
I'm a Jake-is-gay believer but not a happy-family-tile believer.

Anonymous said...

Those actors and actresses can keep their baby on the set, can spend every free moment with the baby - Jake couldn't do that.

Look, I don't believe in BT - but I think there are a LOT of celebs who let nannies do most of the heavy duty caretaking, that's just the way it is. What you hear about in PR planted articles about how much time they spend with kids isn't necessarily true. And not all of them have their kids on the set with them. We have no idea what really goes on. Photo ops with kids don't count. Angelina makes a point of trying to look like she's constantly taking care of her kids, but you're not going to convince that it's not really a team of nannies doing the real work.

Anonymous said...

DaviB, there is no need to apologise about your English - don't be shy about posting :)

Anonymous said...

ITA 11:22, you've got Catholic priests abusing children for centuries, greedy businessmen hauling in $15 million dollar annual salaries plus bonuses and dumping crap into the environment all the while cutting people's retirement benefits and laying off workers, using people's money as their own personal gambling line of credit, etc. etc. Please - dogs are loyal and genuine.

Anonymous said...

Celebrities live in the same world when it comes to kids, they are just humans. Read what Maggie or Ricky have to say about parenting.

Again, I'm not a BT believer - but you can't cite some articles about what Maggie and Ricky say as proof that they are the same as you or I. Sure, they love their kids, I'm not saying that - but Maggie has a nanny, I'm sure - maybe more than one. And personal assistants, etc. And so does Ricky. So to say they live in the "same world" as the rest of us is just not true.

Anonymous said...

Remember when Jake got Boo right after baby M. was born? Please, it's too obvious he wanted kids. I think Boo was his baby substitute. So, I don't think it's so far fetched what Ted said.LOL, do you hear yourself?
Do you even realize the difference between a dog and a human being?
Please don't insult the dogs, comparing them to humans.


Playing stupid again?

prairiegirl said...

I disagree. I think the way Jake held Boo when he/she was a pup was very telling. He held that pup exactly like one holds a baby. Look at the pictures of that entire pap clip. He pays more attention to that dog over that meal and then when the meal is done, he holds the pup while Maggie coos over it just like an infant. And in the pictures of him & his mother, they are both fussing over that dog, taking Boo out of its cage and I don't know what all they're doing with that dog, lol.

If I understand correctly, Jake has made statements in the past that he's wanted kids, 4 or so? Something like that. He is 29 now, would've been 26 or 27 around the time of BT1's birth. That is a good time for people to start to want to start a family. Why would Jake be any different?

And thanks to the person who put up those two Ted items. I've never seen that first one about the adoption theory.

Anonymous said...

I think there are a LOT of celebs who let nannies do most of the heavy duty caretaking, that's just the way it is

I know, but why would Jake be one of them? After all that trouble to have a baby?

Anonymous said...

Playing stupid again?

No, you must be playing dumb - and blind and deaf as well.

Anonymous said...

So to say they live in the "same world" as the rest of us is just not true.

Millions and millions of "civilians" have people who help them raise their kids or have nannies.

Anonymous said...

I wax and wane on BT - I truly can't imagine someone wanting a child and leaving him or her in the care of someone else. Especially with two men - there's no "oops" involved - it's a long, well-thought and most likely expensive proposition. I don't believe that's the way some people do it. A child without the real love of their own parents and not nannies - the world would be in a sad state of affairs. Oh wait . . .

In SB's case three months is a lot different than 2-3 years of keeping a child out of the spotlight. As someone said above, at some point the child is going to become aware.

Anonymous said...

Jake is a young and gorgeous man. I’m sure he wants to enjoy his life, date hot guys, have hot sex and have lots of fun instead of making a baby with the supposed closeted boyfriend he spends little time with and then hide the kid for years.

Family guy Jake said...

June, 2006: "I want a lot of kids. Two or four. Not six. It's torture after four."

Anonymous said...

A lot of people don't raise their kids with the help of nannies - and the kids grow up just fine, better, IMO. They grow up real. A lot of mothers, sometimes alone, raise children with limited finances and a grasp of reality, and the kids grow up fine. I'm not big on artifice.

prairiegirl said...

And I know I've been one to hassle the guys over what looks like their time apart but the truth is we only see them for a fraction of their time.

As someone who believes Jake is with Austin, that's why it seemed like a good situation when Austin took on the role on OTH. Because they filmed in North Carolina and at the time, Jake was also on the east coast so it helped with distance.

There is alot of unaccounted time when we don't see the guys.

That's just my take on it. Enjoying the discussion here. At least most everyone can discuss it civilly.

It's quite a change from even say, a month ago, when the idea of BT was totally laughed off the screen. And look how far it's come. It's really, really not that far-fetched. And it's big and "out there" enough to be very real.

Anonymous said...

Sure, they love their kids, I'm not saying that - but Maggie has a nanny, I'm sure - maybe more than one.

Nannies aren't the point - the amount of time a parent spends with the kid is the point: Jake doing a movie after movie, Jake and Austin not being together for months.

Anonymous said...

Family guy Jake said...
June, 2006: "I want a lot of kids. Two or four. Not six. It's torture after four."


It's easy for men to say that they want many kids (and many seem to want to have a bunch). But they don't have to carry them for 9 months and give birth to them and then breast feed etc... It's not easy.

Anonymous said...

I wax and wane on BT - I truly can't imagine someone wanting a child and leaving him or her in the care of someone else.

Me too. I don't have kids, my 'parenting' experience is just with cats, and even with kittens I prefer to be in charge :)

Anonymous said...

What is Jake doing here? Checking if Jakey jr. is still there?

Copping a feel

Anonymous said...

Hey, is that BT behind that rock?

Jake loves children said...

It's easy for men to say that they want many kids (and many seem to want to have a bunch). But they don't have to carry them for 9 months and give birth to them and then breast feed etc... It's not easy.

If people didn't have kids just because it was hard then no one would be born. There are 64.3 million estimated numbers of fathers across the nation so obviously folks are having offspring. Why should Jake be any different? Particularly, given his considerable material resources and considerable extended family connections. In other words, he has all kinds of resources available to him to make having a child hardly the challenge as it is for others.

Anonymous said...

June, 2006: "I want a lot of kids. Two or four. Not six. It's torture after four."

2007, Cannes interview - Jake said that he wants a small family of his own, but there is time, he's still young (I remember that because we used it as an argument against Reeke tabloid fiction).

Anonymous said...

Why should Jake be any different?

Because Jake is a good guy, who will make a good parent, and good parents want what's the best for their kids and hiding the kid in the closet can't be good.

Closet Jake said...

Jake said that he wants a small family of his own, but there is time, he's still young


Let's just say, if Jake wanted to have a child without the outside world knowing, I doubt that he would have announced it at the Cannes Film Festival. Also, living in the closet means that you have to come up with all kinds of cover stories when you are asked a question that might prove to be revealing. Concealment is the game. I think Reeke occurred partly to give him the "family man" persona so he could have the breathing space to start his own family. Besides those phony coffee runs, Jake really wasn't that publically accessible from 2007-2009. Also, just like some argue that there is no BT because Jake is never around to raise the child, the question needs to be asked, "How do we know that BT wasn't with him when he was filming overseas? Or, with him now. Celebrities have a bunch of people taking care of their every need. Plenty of cash can buy plenty of privacy, and a whole lot of helping hands. I'm sure Jake is no different.

Anonymous said...

How do we know that BT wasn't with him when he was filming overseas?

Even so, keeping BT in the movie set trailer would be too risky and unfair to BT + the other parent would be a few tousand miles away.

Davide Bo said...

Why hide a child when you can say the baby is the result of a secret affair of Austin with a girl?
I mean, you pay a beard, you ca pay a "fake-mother-who-reject-a-child-after-the-born"
Austin is a single father. Jake is the best friend. No need to hide a child for three years.

Jake said...

DaviB, who's picture is that?

Anonymous said...

But maybe BT was in a nice hotel room with the nanny?

Anonymous said...

A nice a nice hotel room with the nanny and Austin would be much better for all concerned.

Other possibilities said...

Even so, keeping BT in the movie set trailer would be too risky and unfair to BT + the other parent would be a few tousand miles away.

BT doesn't have to be in a movie set trailer to be with Jake. Father's go to work every day and come home to their family.

Anonymous said...

Having a child is supposed to be a challenge - if it isn't, then something's amiss. It's not supposed to be easy. You don't leave children with extended family or nannies for a majority of the time. The majority of time, a child should have the love and care of his parents.

That said, I think it would be nice if Jake and Austin were parents, but since there's no way I can know anything for sure, I don't really care about it. There are billions of people in the world, yes, but they are not planned in most cases.

Anonymous said...

BT doesn't have to be in a movie set trailer to be with Jake.

LOL. This made me laugh for some reason.

Anonymous said...

you ca pay a "fake-mother-who-reject-a-child-after-the-born" Austin is a single father. Jake is the best friend. No need to hide a child for three years.

That scenario sounds much more reasonable than hiding a kid for years and years. Maybe they considered it and thought it would be too risky?

Anonymous said...

I don't understand why Sandra went to such elaborate lengths to hide her baby either. If the reports are true.

Anonymous said...

Picturing poor BT waiting all day for Jake to come back to the trailer.

(((Jake)))

Poor BT. ;)

Anonymous said...

I think it would be nice if Jake and Austin were parents, but since there's no way I can know anything for sure, I don't really care about it.

True. But, this is a blog grounded in speculation, wouldn't you agree? No one has smoking gun proof of anything regrding Jake, Austin or BT... only circumstantial evidence, just like what is relied upon in most legal proceedings. If we had a video or photo or a credible eyewitness willing to blab, we wouldn't need to theorize. I enjoy when everyone states their opinion as respectfully as they have this morning. Everyone has their point of view and they are supporting it with rational presentations. Some very interesting points have been made and I've appreciated the exchange.

Anonymous said...

True, and all of that is great - but people take it a little too seriously, drawing battle lines down the middle.

I can see SB wanting to keep her little one out of the spotlight, but cloak-and-dagger disposal of baby diapers, in trash cans under cover of darkness? IDK *shrugs*

Anonymous said...

you ca pay a "fake-mother-who-reject-a-child-after-the-born" Austin is a single father. Jake is the best friend. No need to hide a child for three years.

Thinking about the weak spots:
- fake mother would have to be someone who can be trusted
- Austin and his family would have to lie about BT's whereabouts when BT is with Jake.

Anonymous said...

Easy question - is Austin living with Jake (and BT)?

Anonymous said...

1:24, I'd think so.

Anonymous said...

It's possible, but IDK.

Jake is in London? said...

mattypop39: Jealous isnt even the word!!!!! See u soon x x RT @SarahxGardner: Just met jake gyllenhaal ... He is hawt! :)
23 minutes ago

(mattypop39 and SarahxGardner's location is London)

Anonymous said...

Had JF Francis agreed to "hang out" with Jake do you think Jake would've brought him back to his and Austin's home?

Jake said...

*cough*

Anonymous said...

Had JF Francis agreed to "hang out" with Jake do you think Jake would've brought him back to his and Austin's home?

If they're all into threesomes, why not? ;)

Anonymous said...

Jake is in London?

I think so. A poster on DCF also said he's in England but didn't give any source.

Anonymous said...

Had JF Francis agreed to "hang out" with Jake do you think Jake would've brought him back to his and Austin's home?

Jake is a naughty boy, I think he would've hung out with Francis in their matrimonial bed. He probably did with his other hook ups. ;)

Anonymous said...

When will PoP premiere in London and when is his Jonathan Ross appearance?

Anonymous said...

uh,uh - the matrimonial bed is sancrosanct. Take the himbos to a hotel!

DCF post said...

I think so. A poster on DCF also said he's in England but didn't give any source.

^^^
Jakes in England at the Moment!!!

Next week he's gonna be on 'The Jonathan Ross Show' talking about 'PoP', he was also meant to be on BBC Radio 1 next week but this morning it was confirmed that he cancelled.

Anonymous said...

^^^ dated yesterday

Anonymous said...

When will PoP premiere in London and when is his Jonathan Ross appearance?

May 9 and 7.

Anonymous said...

Make that sacrosanct. Let's put it this way - if my partner cheated, it would make the difference between staying together and divorcing, where he cheated. :)

Anonymous said...

uh,uh - the matrimonial bed is sancrosanct. Take the himbos to a hotel!

Hotel?! No, not kinky enough.

Anonymous said...

May 9 and 7.

TY.

Anonymous said...

uh,uh - the matrimonial bed is sancrosanct. Take the himbos to a hotel!

Come on, Jake is a celebrity, his house is much more private ;)

Davide Bo said...

@Anonymous, May 01, 2010 1:23 PM
A surrogate mather is someone you can trust. Jake could stay with BT when he and Austin were together.
Austin and his family no need to lie.

Davide Bo said...

For a gay couple in the closet have a child is always a risk.
For a parent the most important thing is the happiness of their child. A child in the closet can't be happy.
I can't image Jake so selfish. Maggie and Naomi would disagreed.

Anonymous said...

missvharrington: @ LAX airport & just seen Jake Gyllenhall.......FIT!!!
about 15 hours

Anonymous said...

Nannies aren't the point - the amount of time a parent spends with the kid is the point: Jake doing a movie after movie, Jake and Austin not being together for months.

Hey, I don't believe there is a BT. The reason I don't believe there is a baby is not because I think they'd be worrying about spending enough time with the baby, though - the reason I don't think there is a BT is because it would be way too much of a freaking hassle to keep the kid hidden. What did Sandra B say? It was like a CIA operation - and that was only for three months. I can't imagine anyone living like that for years. It would end up driving you insane - literally.

Anonymous said...

Millions and millions of "civilians" have people who help them raise their kids or have nannies.

Yes, millions of "civilians" have people (often family) who help them with kids, of course; but a live-in nanny (or nannies) and personal assistants are for the privileged - it's not the same thing. In any case, I don't think there is a BT so I guess it doesn't matter, lol.

Anonymous said...

For a parent the most important thing is the happiness of their child. A child in the closet can't be happy.

Clay, Ricky and I agree. Vin Diesel is extremely private, but I think he would agree too :)

YouTube said...

Posted on WDW, new interview

Jake Gyllenhaal - GameTrailers TV (WonderCon 2010 Interview)

Anonymous said...

Had JF Francis agreed to "hang out" with Jake do you think Jake would've brought him back to his and Austin's home?

Well, I don't doubt that JG Francis got the "hang out" invitation, but I'm not convinced J&A have a shared home; anyways, I don't think Jake brings his "hang out" hook-ups back to his home. They're strictly for play and I doubt he'd even want them knowing where he lived.

lol said...

mattypop39: Just met Jake Gyllenhaal! Omfg Fit as fuck!!! I want him to sit on my face lol!
2 minutes ago

Matt Corcoran
London
Heeeey!! Im Matt I am 23 from London, Im a gay boy doing gay things! I love my life, love my friends! Anything else you want to know just contact me :)

lol said...

Davidthefixer: I don't think he needs to meet you RT @MaxineAlisha: So Jake Gyllenhaal is already in London, I need to meet this man. NOW.
3 minutes ago

Anonymous said...

My goodness, such comments! :)

new interview said...

...
Gyllenhaal says he "over-prepared, wildly" for the sword-fighting, horse-riding, fist-fighting, rope-climbing, etc., needed for the job and treated the whole experience like some rollicking ride through a Kipling epic. He said the shooting dates in Morocco and the outsized presence of Newell ("Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire," "Donnie Brasco") lent to the sense of safari.

"He's a big, robust guy, he's really a general, like how you imagine a D.W. Griffith might carry himself on the set," Gyllenhaal said. "He would use a bullhorn if you handed him one. He's got this bellowing, old-school British accent -- you hear him from behind the camera, 'That's smashing, Jake, smashing. Well done, my boy.' You're not living in 'The Sheltering Sky' but it's easy to pretend you were in this old British Empire moment."
...
"I grew up with filmmakers and I consider myself a filmmaker, sort of, but as an actor taking on a role I know that I'm just a piece of a situation. What I mean by that is you become part of the story that will be up there on the screen and that makes you want to try a really wide variety of situations. You try on a coat, you wear for it a while and you give it back. That's what acting is. I know this is going to sound simple or maybe even trite, but for a filmmaker there's a real devotion to the movie -- an investment -- but sometimes as an actor you just want to try something on."

Jake Gyllenhaal as the 'Prince of Persia': You try on a coat, you wear for it a while and you give it back

destiny said...

Most of the women I know who had children went back to work--and a few cases of free=lancing dads who worked at home and take care of the children. Some of it is economic necessity, and some of it is women who want to have both children and a career. I don't know, maybe New York is different that way, but I just have to look around my building, office, neighborhood, the bus, etc. so see how many children have nannies. But all of the working parents I know can't wait to get home at the end of the day to be with their families, ditto for weekends.

It wouldn't surprise me if Jake isn't the one taking BT with him to work; he's the big star with the resources, his own trailer on the set, bodyguard while working, etc.

The real problem I see is the three of them spending time together. I kind of doubt Austin was hanging out in London, Montreal, etc., especially when he was filming OTH. And who knows, maybe BT gets dropped off with family too in Texas, or with Maggie in Brooklyn, Stephen G., etc.

There have been plenty of families that have to spend time apart for many reason, but imo it leads to issues with absent parents, it affects bonding, happiness, etc., especially with very young children. I just had a friend whose husband had to go back to his country because of visa problems and was gone for over a month. Her poor little boy, who is 3 1/2, was okay for a few days, but after that he was moody and far more difficult to deal with.

Sadly I do think J&A are the kinds who would do that to their own child. Hell, Jake spent three years bearding with Reese, isn't that pretty much proof that he'll do anything including selling his own mother? jake in particular is immature, insecure, needy and looking for attention no matter how he has to get it, and wants more than anything in the world to be a big star.

I also think he is arrogant enough to think he can get away with all this, that somehow he can hide BT forever, or that BT will turn out normal despite being a prisoner in his own home.

What I really don't get is why Austin went along with all this. Growing up in Texas and not HW, and on the surface seeming more normal than Jake.

I guess the pursuit of power, fame and money really does corrupt just about everyone.

Anonymous said...

It wouldn't surprise me if Jake isn't the one taking BT with him to work; he's the big star with the resources, his own trailer on the set, bodyguard while working, etc.

True, but Jake can't hide the baby in his trailer: there would be too much people, babies cry, small kids want to play outside, ...

Anonymous said...

Sadly I do think J&A are the kinds who would do that to their own child. Hell, Jake spent three years bearding with Reese, isn't that pretty much proof that he'll do anything including selling his own mother?

Reeking was business, he was bearding for his career.

Having a baby would be bad for business, a risk that could damage Jake's career. Why would J&A want a baby if they aren't willing to do their best as parents?

To be fair said...

I also think he is arrogant enough to think he can get away with all this, that somehow he can hide BT forever, or that BT will turn out normal despite being a prisoner in his own home.

Sadly, that is part of the reckless, live in the moment Jake who also temperamentally likes to look on the bright side of everything.

I guess the pursuit of power, fame and money really does corrupt just about everyone.

...and, maybe life changing love, as well.

Anonymous said...

How old is Jake's supposed baby now?

Anonymous said...

2,5 years?

Anonymous said...

2,5 years?

Well, then it's not a Baby Tile anymore. I'd say we should call him/her Tile jr.

Still not a child said...

I think we can still use the term BT because he is, developmentally, a toddler, i.e. under 4 years of age. Hence, BT, can now mean Baby Toddler *smile*

Anonymous said...

I think we can still use the term BT because he is, developmentally, a toddler, i.e. under 4 years of age. Hence, BT, can now mean Baby Toddler *smile*

Good idea.

Anonymous said...

I'm a firm believer in Baby Tile. Simple reasons. Ted has been asked several times and has consistently said he/she exists. Ted has to pass muster with attorneys before he posts so there had to be some substance to the story in case a lawsuit would follow. Jake and Austin were deeply in love and on the verge of coming out when the baby was conceived. Different times but the result was a child. I don't mean to imply that they are not still in love, just that back then it was more intense and everything seemed possible to them.

Anonymous said...

Ted has to pass muster with attorneys before he posts so there had to be some substance to the story in case a lawsuit would follow.

Okay, I'm not trying to convince you that there is no BT - but I have to point out that there could be no lawsuit unless Ted mentioned Jake by name. Yes, I'm sure the E attorneys watch what gets posted, but that's the whole idea of the Blind Items - since Ted's NOT naming names, they're safe. I'm not arguing with the rest of your reasoning, which may be plausible.

Anonymous said...

Ted doesn't have to pass anything for his Blind Items. It's when he names actual names that he has to run that by someone first.

Anonymous said...

Jake and Austin were deeply in love and on the verge of coming out when the baby was conceived.

The baby was conceived during Reeke, coming out was long forgotten.

October 7, 2008
Dear Ted:
Who is the most loving, sweetest and hottest hubby: Toothy's or yours? Is Baby Tile old enough to walk?
—Grace

Dear Tile-icious:
Mine. No.

Ted has still not recanted said...

IA. Love can make even the hardened cynic believe that anything is possible. Apparently, Jake fell hard for Austin and vice versa when they first met back in 2002. And, even as early as today's Bitch Back, Ted is not pulling any punches when someone asks about TT and GG:

"Dear Ted:
Other than the odd reference here and there, there has been a real drought of gossip on Toothy Tile in the past few months. It seems like forever since we've had a Toothy Blind Vice, clues on his identity or any real news on his current love life. Has Toothy really become that good at hiding his secrets, or are you just growing tired of the whole Toothy-Grey Goose love saga? Any new info you can share?
—JA

Dear Update:
Not happy with the same-sex shenanigans of Toothy's D.L. peers? Can't blame you. I do love T2, who, FYI, I would never grow tired of, but as for Toothy and his hubby go, I'm afraid to report they're not only both behaving far too much for my tastes, they're (again) listening far too much to their advisors. Twisted stuff."

JA= Jake and Austin
Twisted= Jack Twist

destiny said...

It's not just Ted that made me believe in BT--I was a skeptic and ran hot and cold on the topic, one minute believing it, one minute thinking that nobody could be so callous as to hide their own child.


But all those photos from Paris, the nanny/assistant, the footprint, etc. has pretty much convinced me he exists.

Anonymous said...

There is no reason for Ted to pass the muster with E lawyers, TT and BT are blind items, that's what he has been hiding behind for years.

Yes everyone knows who he is talking about, but as long as he doesn't say Jake is hiding a baby, he's safe.

Ted doesn't owe anyone anything, he may feel the need to cater to certain readers but at the end of the day he knows nothing will hapen to him if his BI's turn out to be lies.

What do you think will happen to him? Get arrested buy Gossip cop?

BTW, he lies everyday about Robsten or wahtever those Twilight twits are called, everyone in HW knows Kristen is a dyke.

«Oldest ‹Older   1201 – 1400 of 2745   Newer› Newest»