Zachary Quinto
10.16.11.
nyc...
when i found out that jamey rodemeyer killed himself - i felt deeply troubled. but when i found out that jamey rodemeyer had made an it gets better video only months before taking his own life - i felt indescribable despair. i also made an it gets better video last year - in the wake of the senseless and tragic gay teen suicides that were sweeping the nation at the time. but in light of jamey's death - it became clear to me in an instant that living a gay life without publicly acknowledging it - is simply not enough to make any significant contribution to the immense work that lies ahead on the road to complete equality. our society needs to recognize the unstoppable momentum toward unequivocal civil equality for every gay lesbian bisexual and transgendered citizen of this country. gay kids need to stop killing themselves because they are made to feel worthless by cruel and relentless bullying. parents need to teach their children principles of respect and acceptance. we are witnessing an enormous shift of collective consciousness throughout the world. we are at the precipice of great transformation within our culture and government. i believe in the power of intention to change the landscape of our society - and it is my intention to live an authentic life of compassion and integrity and action. jamey rodemeyer's life changed mine. and while his death only makes me wish that i had done this sooner - i am eternally grateful to him for being the catalyst for change within me. now i can only hope to serve as the same catalyst for even one other person in this world. that - i believe - is all that we can ask of ourselves and of each other.
zq.
Source: www.zacharyquinto.com
3,540 comments:
1 – 200 of 3540 Newer› Newest»@
@ Previous post's comments
@
Needs to be repeated for all closeted gays in so called "glass closet":
but in light of jamey's death - it became clear to me in an instant that living a gay life without publicly acknowledging it - is simply not enough to make any significant contribution to the immense work that lies ahead on the road to complete equality.
Whoever did went to a lot of trouble, I suspect they had a "deadline" and forgot about getting rid of that.
What do you mean?
I think it means that someone is desperate to sell "Jake posing as Grace Jones photo is photoshopped".
I don't know boyz for me that photo it's as false as the" love" with Tylor Swift
I didn't realize where this entire quote came from - I thought it was from an interview. Zachary is a wonderful person.
Wait a moment! do you want to say that someone has voluntarily made the fotoshop, so that Jake could say that it was not true?
I think that person who leaked Jake's Grace Jones photo has other (more incriminating?) Jake's photos so Jake used his lawyers to send him a message "don't publish them or it's going to cost you".
That's the only scenario I can think off that would explain Jake using lawyers for some silly photo.
Zachary is a wonderful person.
Yes, he sounds like a wonderful person, hope his career won't suffer because of being openly gay.
But do you think indeed that the photo is true? I have shown her/it to one friend of mine, enough experienced and he has told that it was a clear example of fotoshop even succeeded not so much good
That's the only scenario I can think off that would explain Jake using lawyers for some silly photo.
That would also explain why Jake was perfectly fine with this fake photo, published before Grace Jones photo.
1:09 PM - I'm not photoshop expert, but Jake using lawyers and trying to force sites to take that photo down is very strange, something is fishy with that photo.
TheeDominizle Dominy
Incredible week - met Jesse Jackson, had a gd conversation with Jake Gyllenhall, saw NY from top of a roof & all with a wonderful man!
3 hours ago
http://twitter.com/#!/TheeDominizleBrooklyn, NY
Creative Writer, Youth Development Worker, A&R, Radio Presenter and Music Event Hostess! Currently carrying out a research project... www.dominizle.blogspot.com
Grace Jones photo has been published during, the promotion / gone out of Source Code, and I believe that Jake aimed a lot at this movie to relaunch his career, he didn't perhaps want other buzz gay that could damage his image of leadmen of sci-fi
Grace Jones photo has been published during, the promotion / gone out of Source Code
Not true. "Source Code" was released on April 1 in US and Grace Jones photo was published 6 weeks later, May 14.
Pezerk Pezerk
@nan_o_monster @tchalla7 @tedj0n I'm game for jogging together with Armstrong, McConaughey and Gyllenhall #brostrong
2 hours ago
Yes, he sounds like a wonderful person, hope his career won't suffer because of being openly gay.
I don't think it will -
He is gorgeous, those strong brows and eyes are really something. :)
Not true. "Source Code" was released on April 1 in US and Grace Jones photo was published 6 weeks later, May 14.
Are you sure? to me it seems that has been published before, I remember to have thought: how will it influence the film? however I am not sure
justapieceofsky Jesse Rabbits
Just saw Jake Gyllenhaal on the street in midtown! Oh, I love New York...
19 hours ago
Not true. "Source Code" was released on April 1 in US and Grace Jones photo was published 6 weeks later, May 14.
yes is true I have checked you are right sorry:)
Are you sure?
Yes.
http://www.dlisted.com/2011/05/15/eat-your-everything-out-grace-jones
Michael K is hilarious :)
Michael K is hilarious :)
Why?
yes is true I have checked
So what's your opinion, why did Jake use lawyers for that fake/real Grace Jones photo?
Michael K is hilarious :)
Why?
Because he doesn't give a shit, he writes what he wants.
daniokeefe Danielle O'Keefe
Jake gyllenhaal spotted on 21st about to take spin class no big deal http://pic.twitter.com/0ueVmLtW
21 Oct
stayC_lassy Stacy Mammen
Jake Gyllenhaal sighting at brunch. Maybe Brooklyn isn't so bad.
2 minutes ago
to 1:42 PM
For me the photo is clearly false, and the film was doing well and it had to still have released to a large extent of the world, perhaps he didn't want to risk, plus would have been an a little hazardous to threaten someone if the photo had been true or there was any of the others.
Jake Gyllenhaal sighting at brunch. Maybe Brooklyn isn't so bad. 2 minutes ago
No Austin this weekend. #5
plus would have been an a little hazardous to threaten someone if the photo had been true or there was any of the others
Hazardous? Jake has millions of dollars for lawyers, nothing hazardous about threatening someone to stop posting photos.
Four months after his birth, we're finally getting a good glimpse at Natalie Portman's son, Aleph.
Mom and son were out and about in Hollywood on Thursday, and although we've seen Portman toting Aleph in cities like New York and Paris, we've never seen his face. Until now!
Aleph was born in June; dad is Portman's fiance, Benjamin Millepied, whom the actress met while filming "Black Swan."
Natalie Portman and baby Aleph
Exactly because he has million of dollars it doesn't need to threaten someone through his lawyers, he simply could privately contactly him or her and to buy his/her silence
I don't think Jake has addresses or phone numbers from all men he was with.
libberation Libby Winters
This brunch brought to you by jake gyllenhall.
2 hours ago
No, but if this guy has these photos is probable that Jake can easily arrive to him. using the lawyers instead has definitely cut every possibility of accord
2:20 PM - you are contradicting yourself.
But what is your opinion, what do you think happened, why was Jake so pissed off by that photo?
No, I am not contradicting myself, I say that if the photo had been true, Jake would have been afraid and he would have tried everything to withdraw it with the smaller noise possible, and this would have been enough easy with all of hisr money and knowledges, therefore if he has not done it it is because surely the photo is a forgery, and obviously it was not dafraid of the reaction or to be denied.
JillFilipovic Jill Filipovic
Having brunch at the same place as Jake Gyllenhaal. The part of the plot where he saw me and fell in love didn't happen though? Weird.
7 minutes ago
I say that if the photo had been true, Jake would have been afraid and he would have tried everything to withdraw it with the smaller noise possible, and this would have been enough easy with all of hisr money and knowledges, therefore if he has not done it it is because surely the photo is a forgery, and obviously it was not dafraid of the reaction or to be denied.
1. It is possible that Jake can't contact the person who took that photo(s) - doesn't have enough info to find that person.
2. It is possible that Jake was scared. If the photo is fake why would Jake use lawyers to threaten websites and ask them to take the photo down? He didn't do that with previous photo which is 100% fake (see 1:10 PM link).
2:40 PM - why are avoiding giving your opinion about what happened?
AdeFink adrienfinkel
Hello NYC and Hello Jake Gyllenhal dining next to me at Prune. I can now die.
20 Oct
2:40 PM - why are avoiding giving your opinion about what happened?
ow, I thought about having done this! however I repeat, the photo is obviously false, many experts are expressed on the subject, to the beginning the photo had the mark TMZ, when they have checked in their file they have discovered that there was not any photo and this already sets a big mortgage on the truthfulness of the matter, I think that after a few years has been clear for everybody that the history of Ted was a forgery, and that since the film was being all right, he didn't want to risk to revert, because he has understood how much the histories (true or false that is) put on internet, they can hurt indeed, therefore he has immediately thought of cut before it took the biblical dimensionos of the saga of TT. With This I don't Want to Say That jAKE is ETERO, Jake is gay with or without TT story or false photos
I thought about having done this!
No, you haven't.
I'll repeat the question: if the photo is fake why would Jake use lawyers to threaten websites and ask them to take the photo down? He didn't do that with previous photo which is 100% fake (see 1:10 PM link). What is your explanation for that?
P.S. Jake knows how Internet works - he knew that he can't stop websites from publishing that photo and he knew that he'll attract more attention to the photo by trying to stop websites from publishing it.
I think that after a few years has been clear for everybody that the history of Ted was a forgery
Ted was right - Jake is gay.
I have done this instead, the first false photo, has gone out in the period of LAOD, where he was practically always naked on a bed, the false photo didn't harm to its image because it was very similar, to the thousand advertising images of the film, instead the second photo is a clear attempt to ridicule him, and to make insinuations on him, if it were true whoever would get angry, Jake has always shown to know how to be to the joke and to have sense of the humor, he has never reacted against all the things said on him, also the most absurd, that's why I believe that its reaction is genuine. Instead why you keep on ignoring all the experienced people consulted that they have said that the photo was false? PS once more I don't believe that Jake is etero
Sorry 3:46 PM, but if Grace Jones photo is fake then it proves that Jake's sense of humor is lacking because people with good sense of humor would just laugh it off.
Instead why you keep on ignoring all the experienced people consulted that they have said that the photo was false?
There is not proof that photo is false, no opinions from photo experts. Your and anyone else's opinion is just an opinion - not proof.
Sense of humor doesn't necessarily mean to accept everything without reacting, a thing it is to laugh with him another it is to laugh at him
When Esquire discovers a Web site that calls George Clooney "gay, gay, gay," the good-natured actor quips, "No, I'm gay, gay. The third gay – that was pushing it."
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20182302,00.html
Sense of humor doesn't necessarily mean to accept everything without reacting...
Wrong - adult celebrities with good sense of humor don't threaten websites for posting silly "fake" photos of them.
There is not proof that photo is false, no opinions from photo experts. Your and anyone else's opinion is just an opinion - not proof.
October 22, 2011 3:56 PM
This same thing can be said on the sexuality of Jake, anybody proof only opinions. Are you sure to want to cross this road? have a lot of opinions of experts come out in that days , do you believe that the site that the has received the LETTER FROM THE lawyers has not made a verification? or all the other GAY sites ? if the photo had been true they would have gained for months, /they have not insisted because theirs also knew that was false, and it didn't suit to them. Once more I am convinced that Jake is gay
lindsaymccomb Lindsay McComb
Um, yes. Great afternoon in Brooklyn. French toast, vintage shops, and Jake Gyllenhaal.
18 minutes ago
OfficialJBFans_ Jonas Brothers Daily
Embarrassing Pictures of Hot Guys: Zac Efron, Taylor Lautner, Ian Somerhalder | http://fb.me/1d252Xigj
51 minutes ago
Can you honestly say that to Jake something has been saved? or has he ever reacted badly? He has sense of the humor. Do you remember the performance to the SNL? he cannot always suffer
This same thing can be said on the sexuality of Jake, anybody proof only opinions.
What?
You are comparing a photo, something everyone can see and check to opinions about sexuality, something you can't prove for straight people, not to mention closeted gay Hollywood celebrities who hide the truth by spending money on PR teams and other people. Oranges and apples, that comparison makes no sense.
he cannot always suffer
Suffer? LMAO! Jake suffered because of some silly photo? Give me a break!
has he ever reacted badly?
Yes, more than once. Spitting on paparazzi is a good example of Jake acting like an asshole.
What?
You are comparing a photo, something everyone can see and check to opinions about sexuality, something you can't prove for straight people, not to mention closeted gay Hollywood celebrities who hide the truth by spending money on PR teams and other people. Oranges and apples, that comparison makes no sense.
October 22, 2011 4:28 PM
Yes, the rule is worth for all ,the opinions they are not facts, and it is easier to discover a false photo than the sexuality of someone
Suffer? LMAO! Jake suffered because of some silly photo? Give me a break!
perhaps suffer is not the correct word, I want to say another word that I don't know how to translate in English "subire." can someone help me?
it is easier to discover a false photo than the sexuality of someone
True. And so far no one proved that Grace Jones photo is false.
Subire - is that Spanish?
The paparazzi don't do amusing jokes or irony, they wants only to steal you some photos to sell, it doesn't care if to you it is well or no, if someone wants to defend his privacy it is correct to react
True. And so far no one proved that Grace Jones photo is false.
October 22, 2011 4:40 PM
or that Jake is gay
Subire - is that Spanish?
no Italian:)
LMAO, what a joke! Jake Gyllenhaal is just another cheap publicity whore who uses paparazzi when that suits him - Jake used them 1.000 times to sell his fake heterosexuality.
The paparazzi don't do amusing jokes or irony, they wants only to steal you some photos to sell
LMAO, what a joke! Jake Gyllenhaal is just another cheap publicity whore who uses paparazzi when that suits him - Jake used them 1.000 times to sell his fake heterosexuality.
True. And so far no one proved that Grace Jones photo is false.
As nobody has tried that they are true, but the fact that the gay sites have allowed to lose, it shows the credibility of the photo
True. And so far no one proved that Grace Jones photo is false.
or that Jake is gay
For God's sake!!!
Everyone can prove that Grace Jones photo is fake or not because everyone can examine the photo and do research.
There is no proof that Tom Hanks is straight. There is no proof that Jake Gyllenhaal is gay.
You can't compare those two things.
LMAO, what a joke! Jake Gyllenhaal is just another cheap publicity whore who uses paparazzi when that suits him - Jake used them 1.000 times to sell his fake heterosexuality.
WOW Do you kiss your mother with that mouth?
Don't blame me for Jake being a whore.
All those that have examined the photo have said that is false! and what do you tell me of children and wife of Tom Hnks to proof his heterosexuality?
Don't blame me for Jake being a whore.
Well it needs to say that clarity is your strong point;)
All those that have examined the photo have said that is false!
Who examined the photo? Please post a link, I would like to read why they think that photo is fake.
what do you tell me of children and wife of Tom Hnks to proof his heterosexuality?
Wife and kids aren't proof that man is straight.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23168113/ns/health-behavior/t/i-married-gay-man/
Who examined the photo? Please post a link, I would like to read why they think that photo is fake.
October 22, 2011 5:11 PM
OMG! was in almost all the sites that spoke of it, there are hundreds of comment and valid opinions to support, me same have asked to one enough experienced friend of mine, (I know that this doesn't count but is true) you Respond instead! if the photo is true why all the sites have they allowed to lose? now I look for them however,
Subire - to put up with or endure - an ordeal?
One more time - we are talking about people who examined the photo and who have some kind of expertise, not comments made by ignorant fangirls.
In other words - so far there is no proof that photo is fake.
Subire - to put up with or endure - an ordeal?
October 22, 2011 5:33 PM
Yes! thanks! grazie:)
Thanks for posting that Jackie. ZQ is awesome. He is a hero.
In other words - so far there is no proof that photo is fake.
October 22, 2011 5:37 PM
what do you say of f Ted? I understand that he has lately lost some credibility however it is always interesting to feel his opinionTed Casablanca
updated 5/16/2011 7:47:27 PM ET 2011-05-16T23:47:27
Print Font: +-The world stopped today. No, not with word of Donald Trump not running for president or of Demi Lovato stripping down to almost nothing, but rather Jake Gyllenhaal taking it all off! Only problem? Apparently, he didn't.
Well, that's at least what some experts are saying, not to mention Jake himself. Could they all be wrong? Is Jake fibbing? Did he totally do this barely clothed homage to gay disco queen Grace Jones?
TWITTER: Follow Ted
In a word? No.
"It's a fake," says Jake's rep, regarding the picture that has Jake impersonating an old Jones album cover and which seems to have mysteriously appeared out of nowhere.
"The skin tones are really good," says one of our best online photo experts, "but the shadows are completely off. Look how there aren't any against the wall, or along the body anywhere. It's a fake."
"Also, the hand," remarked another photo pro. "It's off, it shows the photo's been doctored."
Our own E! photo wizards say the lighting between the room of the hotel (which, apparently, supplies matching carpet and socks for its guests), and that of Jake's body also do not match.
Damn! This could have been so fab, Jake! Why didn't you do this pose, for real?
Taylor never would have bothered you for a caramel non-fat mocha-latte again!
PHOTOS: No Pants, No Problem!
mmmm... well seems that different experts have spoken ;)
Which experts? Any names? Experts like Jake's representative? LOL
6:08 PM - since when do you believe Ted? Oh, I see, you "believe" Ted only when you need him to prove your point.
think that after a few years has been clear for everybody that the history of Ted was a forgery...
DonSkey Don.Skey
Jake Gyllenhaal, you need to go to the barbershop instead of the Key Food
4 minutes ago
Key Food - maybe Jake will finally cook something!
BeautifulWish Candac'e H
So I just randomly bumped into maggie and jake gyllenhaal, like how crazy is that lol
1 minute ago
JacobBrent Jacob Brent
Definitely had dinner next to Jake Gyllenhaal! #NewYorkMoment
5 minutes ago
Which experts? Any names? Experts like Jake's representative? LOL
October 22, 2011 6:16 PM
I am sorry but you don't know how to accept the defeat
Experts like Jake's representative? LOL
The skin tones are really good," says one of our best online photo experts, "but the shadows are completely off. Look how there aren't any against the wall, or along the body anywhere. It's a fake."
"Also, the hand," remarked another photo pro. "It's off, it shows the photo's been doctored."
Our own E! photo wizards say the lighting between the room of the hotel (which, apparently, supplies matching carpet and socks for its guests), and that of Jake's body also do not match. can you read?
think that after a few years has been clear for everybody that the history of Ted was a forgery...
I don't believe very to ted, but I believe in the experts to which he has asked an opinion
I don't believe very to ted, but I believe in the experts to which he has asked an opinion
There are no experts, Ted made that up, just like Ted made up that Jake's rep taked to him about the photo.
be really unbelievable! surrender yourself, the title of the article is: Photo Experts: Nudie Jake Gyllenhaal Pic Is to Fake! Our own E! photo wizards say the lighting between the room of the hotel (which, apparently, supplies matching carpet and socks for its guests), and that of Jake's body also do not match.once more time
can you read?
8:14 PM - you are clueless.
Jake's people would never respond to Ted Casablanca - they know about his Toothy Tile story.
Just because Ted Casablanca wrote something it doesn't mean that it really happened - he's gossiper and E! isn't New York Times.
and who has made the fotoshop it is not Helmut Newton and you not Sherlocks Holmes,e I am not the Bible, however 2+2 still do 4, and Ted has not asked to the people of Jake, but to of the experts on the pretense photo of Jake, PS I don't know how to translate the word clueless.
So you think that Ted lies about Toothy Tile, that he lies about Jake's reps but is telling the truth about "photo experts"! Too funny!
Just yesterday, a photo of Jake Gyllenhaal in his underwear circulated across the internet, as he was said to be paying homage to Grace Jones’ famous pose. Now, we’ve learned that the photo is a fake!
Some photo experts are weighing in on the controversial picture, saying that it’s not actually the actor!
His rep weighed in, saying, “It’s a fake.”
A photo expert said, “The skin tones are really good, but the shadows are completely off. Look how there aren’t any against the wall, or along the body anywhere. It’s a fake.”
Another said, “Also, the hand. It’s off, it shows the photo’s been doctored.”
Are you sad that you don’t get to see the real Jake in his undies? Jake hasn’t really been in the news that much lately, except for the promotion of his latest movie, Source Code. This would have been a nice treat, if it were real, don’t you think? http://earsucker.com/2011/nude-jake-gyllenhaal-photo-branded-a-fake-photo/#comments Not just Ted
clueless - totally uninformed about what is going on; not having even a clue from which to infer what is occurring
clueless - totally uninformed about what is going on; not having even a clue from which to infer what is occurring
well not a good thing:(
8:41 PM - that is the same text reposted by some blog - it was just Ted.
You are clueless if you believe gossipers like Ted Casablanca, Perez, Lainey or Just Jared. They all have some agenda and they aren't reporters - they are selling stories, not facts.
some experts have been consulted before Ted, then he has asked to the expert of E! do you of it a reason, this it doesn't make Jake etero
I'm sure Ted made everything up.
Eeven if he didn't, Ted Casablanca is not reliable source, there is no way anyone will change his/her mind because Ted said that photo is fake.
Ted has not said that the photo it is false, he is limited to textually bring what they have said some experts, he has also added that was sorry that it was not true
Which part of the word LIAR you don't understand???
who is the LIAR in this case?
Believe what you want, you aren't going to change anyone's mind by quoting Ted's bullshit.
I don't want to change the mind of anybody, and this is not flour of the sack of Ted, but of experts of fotoshop, your reaction seems me an a little exaggerated
There are no experts, no Jake's reps, just Ted's fiction.
laylow718 laylow718
Just saw Jake gyllenhall (sp) downtown bk ....
1 hour ago
The Jake/Grace Jones photo reminds me of the leaked pics of Oscar De La Hoya. He was dressed in women's lingerie, and at the time he of course denied it was him, saying the pics were photoshopped. Even had "experts" who swore the pics were fake.
Well now four years later, and the so called expert was actually hired by De La Hoya's lawyers to say they were fake. Oscar admitted a few months ago that the pics were actually real.
At the time, Mr De La Hoya’s handlers brushed off the photos as bad Photoshop jobs and his accuser as a money-grubber.
But in a tell-all interview this week, the former welterweight champ revealed: ‘It was me.’
Known as 'The Golden Boy,' Mr De La Hoya became the subject of the photo scandal in 2007 when Ms Dravnel, who claimed he had cheated on his wife with her and posted the embarrassing images on the internet.
At the time, the De La Hoya camp claimed it wasn’t him in the photos and that the stripper was 'out for money.'
The Golden Boy’s legal team even brought in their own ‘photo expert,’ who said the photos were a computer-generated forgery.
His spokeswoman said of the photos: 'His head's too small and it doesn't even look like his body.'
Geez that last comment about the head & body sounds familiar. LOL!
Four years later, Oscar De La Hoya comes clean: It WAS me in the fishnet and high heels pictures
the experts in this case were independent and consulted in a second moment and not from Jake.
Ted doesn't even name the so called "expert". So who is this person, and how knowledgeable are they? Ted probably just consulted with the resident E! web design person who dabbles in Photoshop as a hobby on weekends.
From Queerty around the time the pic appeared:
Jake’s a public figure, and we can talk about him if we want to. We can even speculate about what he looks like in his underwear. We can’t — and won’t — claim that this picture of him is definitely authentic, since we just don’t know. (A lot of people seem to claim that it isn’t, but internet-photoshop-experts are about as reliable as internet-lawyers.)
http://www.queerty.com/read-the-takedown-letter-that-jake-gyllenhaals-lawyer-sent-us-over-the-photo-that-we-will-not-be-removing-20110517/
but do you know how to read? Ted has brought two opinions of experts it previously expressed
Too stupid for words. Yes sweetchops, I know how to read. I also know not to swallow every word I read on the internet, especially coming from Ted.
Then experienced of the sector that they do it for work they are not believable, but a site of distrusted gossip and that it implicitly admits that the photo is false, or however Don't bring elements that characterize it as true but it appeals to the usual liberty of press to justify, its a little professional behavior, insulting for other other categories of workers and the intelligence of the public, among the other the following day has removed the photo. WHY?
Sorry, Queerty (and Buzzfeed) was the site that received the letter from Jake's lawyers, and they did not remove the photo. Who cares if Ted removed the photo. He's happy to post fake stories about Jake and his beards, so why bother removing a fake photo?
they has removed the photo the day after to have said that they would not have done it
You obviously believe Ted and his experts. That's ok, but there are also opposite opinions to those of Ted. He is not God (except to SK and co) ;)
Ted's / E! experts?!? LOL!
The Jake/Grace Jones photo reminds me of the leaked pics of Oscar De La Hoya. He was dressed in women's lingerie, and at the time he of course denied it was him, saying the pics were photoshopped. Even had "experts" who swore the pics were fake. Well now four years later, and the so called expert was actually hired by De La Hoya's lawyers to say they were fake. Oscar admitted a few months ago that the pics were actually real.
Cool. Oscar has great legs :)
7:53am - Aren't you embarrassed to quote Ted and his PhD photo experts as the basis for an argument!
This is interesting too:
After De La Hoya launched a campaign to discredit the wild images, Milana Dravnel filed a federal lawsuit against him, claiming that his handlers duped her into agreeing that the photos were manipulated.
They settled the lawsuit out of court, and both sides clammed up, citing a confidentiality agreement.
But courthouse sources confirmed Wednesday that De La Hoya paid $20 million to buy her silence. The deal also called for her to give back the heels, lingerie and fishnets that she kept after their kinky photo session.
http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/boxing-legend-de-la-hoya-paid-model-20m-to-keep-quiet-over-his-drag-photos/story-e6frfku0-1226127707120
De La Hoya paid $20 million to buy her silence
Damn!
Closet can be VERY expensive.
The deal also called for her to give back the heels, lingerie and fishnets that she kept after their kinky photo session.
LOL! Heels in his size are hard to find!
KarishmaBhimani Karishma Bhimani
@AUS10NICHOLS Just watched TDATomorrow - the start of my <3 for your sexy grin right there...No wonder @SophiaBush fell for you, I have too!
3 hours ago
kathryn_eurms Kathryn Marie ✓
@SophiaBush Do you know what you're gonna be for Halloween yet?! I loved you and @AUS10NICHOLS as Katy Perri & Russell last year! So great!
12 hours ago
Aren't you embarrassed to quote Ted and his PhD photo experts as the basis for an argument!
No I am embarrassed only for your slowness. Did you know that the Catholic Church has put us around 400 years to admit that Galileo was right and that it was the Earth that turned around the sun? I hope that you put some less time and that fanaticism doesn't take the upper hand.
Oscar and I should swap shoes, I'm about his size.
Please. Don't insult Galileo by comparing him to Ted.
Jake, call me!
In the back of Jake, there am many Mole, as he can easily see in the video of the false tattoo of the Steelers, on the JK show, while in the photo there is not even the shade of a mole
9:08 AM - you should take a good look at the Grace Jones photo before making up things.
9:08 AM - you should take a good look at the Grace Jones photo before making up things.
October 23, 2011 9:11 AM
I HAVE DONE IT
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=214660905220023&set=a.212133618806085.58793.212130695473044&type=1&theater mmmmm.... it seems that somebody else has done it tnot only me.
No moles to be seen
they are seen instead! one especially that to the low right of the helmet, if you look well it is also noticed in your photo with the light of the sun shelled
it seems that somebody else has done it tnot only me
LOL, someone else is playing stupid like you.
In Grace Jones photo Jake's body is in such position that moles can't be seen + check out photos like 9:30 AM and stop insulting everyone's intelligence.
it is not true, at least two moles they can be seen very well, widening the image, obviously if the photo were true, thing that is not as us well we know
9:42 AM - why do you care so much what others think about Grace Jones photo?
9:43 AM
It doesn't care anything of it in reality and I have also gotten tired, but I don't like the liars, and it make me become rabid because we don't need these stupidities to know that Jake is gay, to sustain these buffooneries is self-defeating
9:45am, we know you are still looking for that thing called intelligence as shown by your insistence on quoting Ted as your credible source. LMAO!
I think that Jake's Grace Jones photo is real. So far there is no reason to believe otherwise and that would explain Jake's panic and attempt to stop websites from publishing the photo.
but I don't like the liars
^ Liars??? You just don't like opinions that differ to yours.
It is to certainly talk to you it is not the correct place whether to look for it
^ Liars??? You just don't like opinions that differ to yours.
October 23, 2011 9:54 AM
The opinions are not facts, the Facts disavow this theory
It doesn't care anything of it in reality
Give us a break. Check out your comments, you are obsessed with proving that photo is fake. For some reason you believe that that photo is really bad for Jake's image.
Ânother homophobic case?
I don't think Jake was in such a panic to have the pic removed since the letter only went out to a few sites and it was ignored.
I suspect Jake's lawyers issued the letter w/o consulting Jake. The letter was poorly written and unprofessional, it was from his lawyers office but most likely an intern did it that's why there was no follow-up.
The picture is silly and deserved to be ignored which I think he did, it was his legal dept that jumped the gun
I suspect Jake's lawyers issued the letter w/o consulting Jake.
Bullshit x 1000.
I suspect Jake's lawyers issued the letter w/o consulting Jake. The letter was poorly written and unprofessional, it was from his lawyers office but most likely an intern did it that's why there was no follow-up.
Your Ignorance is blinding and embarrassing.
Sorry, lawyers don't act on something like that without their client knowing.
"Oh hi Jake, this is Richard Thompson of Bloom Hergott Diemer Rosenthal LaViolette Feldman Schenkman & Goodman, LLP.
We just sent a letter to queerty.com about a picture you know nothing about. That will be $5000 thanks. Have a nice day!"
I doesn't care anything of it of the image of Jake, personally I think that the poster of Pop is a worse photo for hisr image of that of Grace Jones, not to talk then of the walk to Taylor Swift, it is not a matter of images but of truth. How can we be believable saying that he is gay if we submit us to these stupidities that all can check and to deny?
he passes for persecuted and us for liars
Sorry, lawyers don't act on something like that without their client knowing.
And lawyers certainly don't check new Jake's photos on the Internet.
10:01 AM -9:57 AM
We are two different people, I don't think of this way on the letter and the lawyers, it is obvious that Jake knew and he has sent them
it is not a matter of images but of truth. How can we be believable saying that he is gay if we submit us to these stupidities that all can check and to deny?
You can't prove that photo is fake because you have no argument to claim that photo is fake.
We DON'T need to be photoshop experts in order to notice Jake's showmances and PR fiction.
We just sent a letter to queerty.com about a picture you know nothing about. That will be $5000 thanks. Have a nice day!
LOL :)
whoever has seen the photo has said that me it is false I have brought tons of matters, but you make the Indians because it suits you, I have gotten tired and it is ridiculous to continue for the last time,: where is the shade on the wall that should be? why the face has clearer spots of light in comparison to the body? why the head is greater in comparison to the body? where are the moles and the muscular tone? the man in the photo is lower than J, and there is not the same distance between neck and shoulders. where are the hair?. however every one of us remains with his/her opinions and it is all right so, there is not worse deaf of whom doesn't want to listen.
10:41 AM - for the 100th time: your OPINION is just your OPINION.
Just because you believe something it does NOT make that the truth. That is still just your opinion and others have the right to have different opinions.
there is not worse deaf of whom doesn't want to listen
We are listening. The point is that you are wrong, that photo looks real to me.
The picture itself is not objectionable, it's the fact that it's so obviously photoshopped. It would be a great pic if it were actually Jake's body. He's got a nice one, long arms and legs and torso. The guy in this pic looks more short and compact, and all the other elements look stilted and unnatural. This pic is so obviously a photoshop deal, that's what people are saying. This is so laughable, it's a common yoga pose that Grace Jones did not invent. lol Men have been doing yoga for centuries. That some would build up so much controversy about it says more about their own predjudices about gay people than those you accuse of being homophobes.
Just another attempt to goad Jake out of the closet, and cutting off anyone who would disagree by calling them homophobes to shut them up.
I don't believe Jake's lawyers would have gotten involved in something so minor, there are pics like this all over the internet, just another day at the shop if you ask me. (Although we haven't seen the Austin and the legs pic in quite some time either, come to think of it.) I'm sure he and his people ignored it, as with all the others.
I think some were taking 'journalistic license' and I use that term very loosely.
The lobster claw hand is the funniest thing.
Why simply you don't answer to the questions? where is it the shade that should be on the wall? PS if I mistake you you are wrong at least the double PPS my opinion can be wrong but at least I try to bear it with concrete facts and believable examples, yours no, you repeat only to me it seems true, or Ted is not believable, but you knows a thing it is ok for me thinks what you want to say what you want. Can matter now be changed?
Whaaaaa? Ted is not believable? MichaelK didn't seem convinced either.
The picture itself is not objectionable, it's the fact that it's so obviously photoshopped.
Photoshopped? Looks like Jake Gyllenhaal to me.
It's strange that no one has ever found the original pic where Jake's head was supposedly cut and pasted from.
There doesn't seem to be a lot of Jake's body hair either - this guy in the pic seems more blond.
It's strange that no one has ever found the original pic where Jake's head was supposedly cut and pasted from.
We don't know this, maybe they have, and maybe they will. Never say never!
This pic is so obviously a photoshop deal, that's what people are saying. This is so laughable, it's a common yoga pose that Grace Jones did not invent. lol Men have been doing yoga for centuries. That some would build up so much controversy about it says more about their own predjudices about gay people than those you accuse of being homophobes.
You are so right that I don't even know how to find the words to say it
Why simply you don't answer to the questions? where is it the shade that should be on the wall?
^ Why should there be a shadow on the wall? If no flash was used, there would be no shadow. Also, the room appears to have recessed lights (you can see one near the door). These types of lights would not cast a shadow on the wall.
We don't know this, maybe they have, and maybe they will. Never say never!
Oh come on! The OMGers know every pic of Jake inside out. Someone would have found it by now.
There might not necessarily be a shadow, depending on the lighting, I agree.
I wish Jake would pose doing yoga, some black and whites would be beautiful. Like Herb Ritts photos of men, which are gorgeous.
Jake's Grace Jones photo is genuine, that's why Jake freaked out and called his lawyers.
The OMGers know every pic of Jake inside out. Someone would have found it by now.
I'm sure they are on the case, even as we speak!
The picture itself is not objectionable, it's the fact that it's so obviously photoshopped.
Sure, so obviously photoshopped that Jake called his lawyers the minute he saw it! LOL
You go to study what the reflexes and the shades are before speaking, better for you
You are never satisfied. You cried because no one answered your question - you got a logical answer - but no, that's not good enough! You are not interested in explanations. Go back to drinking Ted's koolaid breast milk. Bye
OMG has better things to do now like complain about the latest fake tweets and are pissed that Austin and Sophia are in NC hanging out at haunted houses!
The arm that the foot holds would have had to make shade on the wall for strength, and you sees that under the picture on the wall it is very more dark color
That some would build up so much controversy about it says more about their own predjudices about gay people than those you accuse of being homophobes.
Some???? Those some are Jake and his people.
11:46 So is the body fake now as well? I thought it was just the head. Maybe the wall is fake, and really is a doorway to the fifth dimension.
OMG has better things to do now like complain about the latest fake tweets...
Latest fake tweets? You mean tons of tweets from last 5 weeks which prove that Jake is in NYC all the time and Austin never ever visited? No wonder OMG is pissed off, Jake and Austin keep proving that they broke up long time ago and that there are no BTs.
Fake tweets = those they don't want to believe.
PG is calling Austin a deadbeat dad because he is dumping his parental duties on Jake, while Austin is romping around in haunted houses with Soapfia.
11:46 So is the body fake now as well? I thought it was just the head. Maybe the wall is fake, and really is a doorway to the fifth dimension.
October 23, 2011 11:49 AM
Yes and even in this fifth dimension Jake and Austin are married indeed and they have some children! I wanted to say that the wall returns the shade therefore it is not the type of light that makes the shade of Jake to miss
12:00 PM - no, there shouldn't be shades, try to make up some other "argument".
It's strange that no one has ever found the original pic where Jake's head was supposedly cut and pasted from.
Good point.
PG is calling Austin a deadbeat dad because he is dumping his parental duties on Jake, while Austin is romping around in haunted houses with Soapfia.
So OMG is pretending that 1.000 tweets about Jake being out in the city every day, eating breakfasts, brunches, lunches and dinners, attending different events, are fake?
Or OMG thinks that fathers usualy leave their kids at home and go out to eat?
They'd rather believe that Austin and Jake are deadbeat parents than that there aren't any babies? :(
Post a Comment