Heath Ledger and unknown boy, 1988Ah, the apple trees,
Blossoms in the breeze,
That we walked among,
Lying in the hay,
Games we used to play,
While the rounds were sung,
Only yesterday, when the world was young.
Angele Vannier and Johnny Mercer
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3,120 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 1801 – 2000 of 3120 Newer› Newest»Jake lies. He also says he's not gay and is a very private person and that Reese was his girlfriend. Having a motocycle means nothing. What about the two Audi Q7s? That is not a single man's car.
Having a motocycle means nothing.
That "means nothing" only because you ignore facts which doesn't support your opinion.
Having kids doesn't make you mentally ill. And, lots of gay guys are having families these days. Being in the closet doesn't mean that someone might not want to have a family too. Ted said early on that Toothy was having a kid with Goose so I believe that Jake has at least one child. Does he have more? I'm beginning to wonder.
IHJ interview scan: Jake Gyllenhaal: "I don't have children, so I can still be selfish..."
Did OMG discuss that?
Having kids doesn't make you mentally ill.
Only insane people hide their kids.
That "means nothing" only because you ignore facts which doesn't support your opinion.
Like you ignore the ginormous Audi Q7s. My brother has four kids AND a motorcycle. It does mean nothing. I can sure tell you, right now, however, that my brother never had two, 7 passenger vehicles when he was single. He drove around in cars that were chick magnets.
Only insane people hide their kids.
I'm sure if Jake has children he doesn't hide them from his family and friends, just the public. Like the person said above, "Time will tell."
Like you ignore the ginormous Audi Q7s.
What Audi Q7 had to do with being a parent? We know that Jake had big and safe cars 5-6 years ago, there are pictures. Please explain.
Only insane people hide their kids.
I'm sure if Jake has children he doesn't hide them from his family and friends, just the public.
LOL!
Jake is a public figure so he hides his kid(s) whenever he goes out or he never goes out with them. You call that sane?
Jake and Austin spending 20 days per year in the same city is another proof that they are parents?
Yes, he is hiding his kids.
What Audi Q7 had to do with being a parent?
This has been thoroughly discussed already on OMG.
And yes, Jake lies.
Jake and Austin spending 20 days per year in the same city is another proof that they are parents?
That's such an exxageration and generality. Look how Jake fooled most people about the Nashville trip. He was in North Carolina.
This has been thoroughly discussed already on OMG.
I believe that but the point is that you can't use such nonsense as an argument that Jake is a parent, that's too silly for words.
You choose to ignore his motorcycle, you choose to ignore that he had a big car years ago and you choose to ignore that people who are single drive big cars too.
Look how Jake fooled most people about the Nashville trip.
Mumford concert? Jake was there.
Why do you think he was in North Carolina?
Yes, he is hiding his kids.
Why would he do that? He obviously doesn't care about Austin, does Jake have a partner?
MichaelK needs to back to salivating over Anderson Cooper. It's much more interesting. ;)
Who is ignoring the motorcycle?
I've seen it. We've all seen it. What about it? I've got a married neighbor with a new baby who lives in the next building. He has a big ol' honkin' motorcycle parked next to the family 4-door sedan, both items squished into a single carport space. That motorcycle sits and sits, even through the summer.
Can't put a baby on the darn thing but I reckon he refuses to let go of that piece of his bachelorhood. Maybe when the kid reaches high school, he'll take it out more often.
But for the most part, he & his wife use the 4-door sedan because that's what holds the carseat.
A motorcycle doesn't mean much at all, sorry.
Mumford concert? Jake was there.
I'm still not convinced on that one but that's not the Nashville trip I'm talking about.
I'm talking about the ol' Tay Nashville trip. Talk about a trip full of holes that his PR screwed up on, lol.
A motorcycle doesn't mean much at all, sorry.
Of course not, you choose only what you like, lol!
Most drivers want to feel safe in their cars - you can't use a big car as an argument that someone has kids and pretend this is the first time Jake is driving a big car.
Most parents care more about their security so you can't ignore buying and driving a motorcycle for the first time just because if does not fit into "Jake is a family man" scenario.
Jake Gyllenhaal: "I don't have children, so I can still be selfish..."
Still no BT believers who would care to comment? I thought so!!!
I'm talking about the ol' Tay Nashville trip. Talk about a trip full of holes that his PR screwed up on, lol.
Jake's trip to Nashville after the showmance ended? There are pictures, Jake was there.
Jake can still be a family man and have some fun once in awhile, the two terms aren't mutually exclusive. "Tay" is in the past now.
Jake can still be a family man and have some fun once in awhile
I agree, but there is nothing, absolutely nothing to suggest that Jake is a parent or in a relationship with Austin.
I agree, but there is nothing, absolutely nothing to suggest that Jake is a parent or in a relationship with Austin.
^^ Sorry but that does not make it so.
Tom Hardy has split from actress fiancee Charlotte Riley. The couple - who got engaged last July after dating for one year - reportedly broke up last month although the 'Inception' actor is said to be desperate to rekindle their relationship. A source told the Metro newspaper: "Tom and Charlotte broke up last month. He has been calling her a lot to try to patch things up."
http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/56267284.html
Jake Gyllenhaal: "I don't have children, so I can still be selfish..."
It's already been answered. Jake lies to hide his personal life. This is not rocket scientist stuff people. The key is when people who know Jake talk about him, they describe him as anything but selfish. Anne Hathaway even used the word nurturing. Doesn't sound like a selfish person to me. So Jake knows that given his age he's going to be asked about children. He has to have a ready made excuse. It's a common fallacy that people who don't have children are selfish. Jake probably thought the reasoning was full proof. Frankly, I know tons of people who are selfish and still have children.
Sorry but that does not make it so.
Sorry, but you and OMG have just your wishful thinking.
After 4 years there is nothing to support "Jake has kids" opinion, just tons of proof that Jake and Austin don't care about being together. Some parents!
So Jake knows that given his age he's going to be asked about children. He has to have a ready made excuse.
There is no need for any excuses, no one in a 1.000.000 years would ask Jake about his kids. They asked him about having kids and they will ask again, but a parent would NEVER say something like that. Never.
So what? If he lies about Why would a parent lie like that about what's most imnp
So Jake knows that given his age he's going to be asked about children. He has to have a ready made excuse.
There is no need for any excuses, no one in a 1.000.000 years would ask Jake about his kids. They asked him about having kids and they will ask again, but a parent would NEVER say something like that. Never.
I agree, but there is nothing, absolutely nothing to suggest that Jake is a parent or in a relationship with Austin.
Ah, a very persuasive argument. You simply say there is no evidence so all evidence vanishes. There's a lot of info to suggest Jake is in a committed relationship and has kids, if you are open minded. I'm not going to repeat what has been posted over at OMG for years. I believe there is even a FAN CHITCHAT Room that has an entire thread on Baby Tile. Lots of specifics there too.
Jake lies to hide his personal life.
What personal life? Jake and Austin are next to never at the same coast at the same time, what is there to hide????
There's a lot of info to suggest Jake is in a committed relationship and has kids, if you are open minded.
There is just Ted's gossip.
You keep ignoring facts and pretend that Jake and Austin not spending time together is a sign they are raising kids in a committed relationship. How crazy is that?
There's a lot of info to suggest Jake is in a committed relationship and has kids, if you are open minded. I'm not going to repeat what has been posted over at OMG for years.
No need for that, I know what was posted - 4 things that might mean there is ONE BT, and 1.000 things confirming over and over again that Jake is single and doesn't have kids.
Guys, please, there is nothing to suggest that Jake has a kid or relationship with Austin - from Jake leaving Austin in LA to enjoy MV, buying a motorcycle or saying "I don't have kids" to Austin's traveling around and posing with the beard and family.
PR couldn't have written it any better. That is exactly what they want people to think.
Personally I find it odd that someone who is single would feel compelled to say "I don't have kids".
People raise children under all kinds of conditions. Not saying any of it is ideal, but it happens. A parent who works in another city and only sees the family on weekends. Children who are sent to boarding school. Actors who spend 12 hours or more on the set of TV shows and probably see very little of their kids on their days off.
Jake hasn't worked in over a year, so what's a few concerts or overnight trips in the scheme of things? He probably spends more time with BT than most parents who work ever get to spend with their children.
Personally I find it odd that someone who is single would feel compelled to say "I don't have kids".
Huh??????????????????
You are saying that parents wouldn't have a problem with such disgusting lie? You really mean that?
There is no need for any excuses, no one in a 1.000.000 years would ask Jake about his kids. They asked him about having kids and they will ask again, but a parent would NEVER say something like that. Never.
If you don't think that Jake's people monitor and approve what is asked of him, you don't know anything about how Hollywood publicity works. Politicians work the same way. If you don't play the game, your access is cut off. Look what happened to the former publicist Jonathan Jackson. He now is relegated to an obscure blog (dishinthedirt) and pushes straight Jake garbage. Your over the top argument makes one think you have some vested interest in Jake not having kids. Believe what you want, but don't think your emphatic prose proves anything. Because it doesn't.
A parent who works in another city and only sees the family on weekends.
Why do you insist on insulting our intelligence? Do you really think we forgot about all those times when Jake CHOOSED to spend his time away from Austin or Austin choosed to spend his time away from Jake? You can't undo facts.
If you don't think that Jake's people monitor and approve what is asked of him, you don't know anything about how Hollywood publicity works.
What are you talking about?
What Jake's "I don't have kids" has to do with Hollywood publicity???????
Please explain if you can.
Destiny's point is well taken. Since the general public knows Jake doesn't have children, why did he feel he needed to clarify that issue?
Maybe because he wanted to have an official quote out there so people could point to it and say, "See he doesn't have any children. He said so in black and white." I've been following Jake for years. He lies. End of story.
Your over the top argument makes one think you have some vested interest in Jake not having kids.
LMAO! What kids? Give us just one trace of anything about those fictional kids, something that isn't Ted gossip or OMG fiction.
so people could point to it and say, "See he doesn't have any children..."
NO ONE believes Jake has kids except few OMG & WFT2 posters. There are NO rumors about Jake having kids. NONE. JiS believers and gossip lovers would never believe Jake is hiding kids.
There is no reason for such lie.
He lies. End of story.
Sure! We should ignore common sense and logic and refuse to use our brains because you think there is no need for that.
Why do you insist on insulting our intelligence? Do you really think we forgot about all those times when Jake CHOOSED to spend his time away from Austin or Austin choosed to spend his time away from Jake?
Give me calendar years, dates and times since you obviously are aware of every move Jake makes. Please, now who's insulting whose intelligence. Amazingly, you even seem to be knowledgeable about what his state of mind is, as well. How do you know if he chose to be somewhere or if he was obligated to go? Are you clarivoyant now too? Remember, bearding doesn't allow you a whole lot of freedom once you sign that contract.
Give me calendar years, dates and times since you obviously are aware of every move Jake makes.
Read WFT2 comments from 2010 - there are dates, time, photos, tweets, articles, reports, sightings. All is there, you know that, but still play stupid.
How do you know if he chose to be somewhere or if he was obligated to go?
Jake was obligated to leave Austin (and kids) in LA and go to MV to help Chris with his farm? Austin was obligated to travel around with his beard and take pictures of his beard and family? Please try again.
Sure! We should ignore common sense and logic and refuse to use our brains because you think there is no need for that.
Common sense can be fallible. And, logic can be faulty. Jake is a flimflam artist. You can continue to believe what he's selling. I prefer to watch the show. Abracadabra anyone? Personally, I definitely think Jake's gay, even though we continue to be bombarded with millions of lies that point to the contrary. Having kids would not be too large a leap for me. He loves kids, is 30 years old and, if he is with Austin Nichols, it wouldn't surprise me that they have a family together.
Jake was obligated to leave Austin (and kids) in LA and go to MV to help Chris with his farm? Austin was obligated to travel around with his beard and take pictures of his beard and family? Please try again.
How do you know the kids weren't with Jake? And, Austin hasn't none much with his beard since last August if you've been paying attention. Just about the time, OMG is suggesting that another child was born.
Read WFT2 comments from 2010 - there are dates, time, photos, tweets, articles, reports, sightings. All is there, you know that, but still play stupid.
No, all is not there. Just what Jake and his people want you to see.
He loves kids, is 30 years old and, if he is with Austin Nichols, it wouldn't surprise me that they have a family together.
We have tons of reasons to believe that Jake is gay and bearding, but we have no reason to believe he has kids or he's still dating Austin or even hangs out with him from time to time.
No, all is not there. Just what Jake and his people want you to see.
Sure - lets ignore photos and sightings and facts, but believe Ted's gossip and OMG fiction. That makes sense!
No, all is not there.
What's next????
When we see Jake in LA and Austin is filming on the other side of the continent, we shouldn't believe it because "Jake and his people" want us to believe that?
but we have no reason to believe he has kids or he's still dating Austin
That's not true. People have been posting info that point to not just one but maybe up to three children. Started in 2007 and continues through to today. You just keep ignoring the info because you've already made up your mind. Same thing with Austin. Personally, I find it odd that the first person Jake wanted to be seen with after PoP promotion was Austin Nichols. Now, why would that be? Yeah, the beard was there, but so what. Then there's Leadville and Jake not showing at the Stand Up to Cancer event. Austin missed his fight that weekend too.
People have been posting info that point to not just one but maybe up to three children.
Ted's answers about BT (one more time - about BT) are not info, aren't even gossip because he doesn't even hint that there is more than one BT. So all you have is someone's idea that 3 answers about BT mean there are three BTs. Why would anyone in the right mind believe in 3 BTs based on that???
Personally, I find it odd that the first person Jake wanted to be seen with after PoP promotion was Austin Nichols.
That was a photo op, not Jake and Austin being together because they missed each other.
Then there's Leadville
That man wasn't Austin.
Jake not showing at the Stand Up to Cancer event. Austin missed his fight that weekend too.
Jake couldn't stand to be away from Austin for a few hours, but Jake was OK to leave LA few weeks before Austin got so to start filming??? Makes sense, lol.
The more the jaustaloons open their mouths, the sillier they look.
Just like with Toothy, Ted had to be creative about BT. His lawyers probably told him to lay off the issue after he initially spilled the beans in January 2007. Back then he probably had no idea that Jake was planning on having more children so I can see where he came up with a backdoor way of getting the information out to the public. I for one don't believe he forgot that he had already answered the "BT is human" question. When I read what Methodical Muser had found (and yes, I think it's a find, very perceptive), it rang true to me. Along with a lot of other oddities. Like several people have already said you can believe whatever you think to be true, but I'm interested in this theory. Makes Jake intriguing again. Not a bad thing. I was losing interest in him for awhile there. Sorry, Jake, but I was. :-)
I for one don't believe he forgot that he had already answered the "BT is human" question.
Ted answered similar question three times so he was talking about three children? Why would Ted be silent about BT2 and BT3?
Ted keeps repeating that there is BT, but he can't even hint that there are BT2 and BT3? Why? How that makes sense?
Jake has no children.
Shut up!
BREAKING: Calif. Supreme Court will hear standing issue in #prop8 case, grants expedited schedule, opening brief due 3/14.
Ted answered similar question three times so he was talking about three children? Why would Ted be silent about BT2 and BT3? >
I think the poster at 3:57 already indicated what they thought the reason for Ted's discretion was about. I went back to the discussion on OMG on January 31st to read Ted's answers and most importantly when the items were posted. If the second baby was born in January, 2009 and a third one last August, it is interesting that Ted publishes a letter about whether BT is human AFTER each birth. Could be his way of saying that another baby is here.
A thought-provoking proposal. Peter Sarsgaard answered an interviewer's question recently about what he admired most about Jake. He responded by saying that he liked that was "adventurous". Well, having not one but maybe several babies while in the closet, would be pretty audacious, enterprising and reckless. RDJ called Jake wet, dark and wild. I'm sensing a theme here. Because on the surface of what he presents to the public, he seems pretty bland and predictable to me. It's what we don't know that maybe makes him a daredevil and risk-taker.
LOL!!! Daredevil? Risk taker??? Jake is as dull as dishwater and all the spewing from family and friends are going to change that.
You fangirls are too much, there is nothing interesting about Jake, period.
I think the poster at 3:57 already indicated what they thought the reason for Ted's discretion was about.
Yes, but that "reason" doesn't make any sense: Just like with Toothy, Ted had to be creative about BT. His lawyers probably told him to lay off the issue after he initially spilled the beans in January 2007.
Ted isn't creative about BT - he keeps saying that TT has a kid. Lawyers didn't do anything because Ted still posts about BT, ergo there is no reason why Ted wouldn't post about BT2 and BT3.
I think it's entirely possible that Jake and Austin have a child, but anything upwards of one or two is really stretching the bounds of credulity. Anyone who has children will tell you it is no day at the beach raising them, so it's not something to oooooh and ahhhhh about like a romantic happy tale. You notice it's people who probably have no children that are so high on this romantic fable. I think it's entirely possible, but I don't waste too much time on it.
Can somebody open a window? It's kinda starting to smell down here in the basement!
there is nothing interesting about Jake, period.
LOL. Do you hear yourself?
What in the hell are you doing here then?
Man, that's rich.
I went back to the discussion on OMG on January 31st to read Ted's answers and most importantly when the items were posted.
I don't get it. How can timing be important when BT2 and BT3 theory is based only on Ted's answers?
Having kids is part of a societal bill of goods we are sold, along with marriage. The reality of both are sometimes anything but happy, as a lot of parents tell me. If you really want both, by all means, go for it - but it's hard work to raise kids even under the best of circumstances, so I'm a bit skeptical that J&A can be such freewheeling spouses/parents. And dumping the kids off with relatives is both immature and inconsiderate. If you have kids, they are yours. Both J&A have young nieces and nephews, don't forget.
but anything upwards of one or two is really stretching the bounds of credulity. Anyone who has children will tell you it is no day at the beach raising them,
Kind of explains why Jake looks so darn tired all the time now, doesn't it.
By the way, where is Jake this week? Weekend? Any pictures anywhere of Mr. Gyllenhaal to account for his whereabouts? When's our actual last picture of the man?
No, it really doesn't, from just a picture alone. Anyone's opinion from a picture is subjective - based on their own thoughts, hopes, dreams, etc. projected onto a photo that could be of anything. He could be tired just from all of the plane travel, and public appearances, and just the general bs he has to endure from being a movie star, etc. I imagine it's pretty wearing.
so it's not something to oooooh and ahhhhh about like a romantic happy tale. You notice it's people who probably have no children that are so high on this romantic fable.
Who said we're oohing and aahing? Who said anyone's knitting booties and throwing the men a baby shower?
This is a tired misconception. We are all discussing it.
Big difference.
Who cares if there's any pictures? Good to know you monitor his day to day activities based on pap pics.
Kind of explains why Jake looks so darn tired all the time now, doesn't it.
Why don't you try to explain why "parents" don't give a shit about their "family and kids" and prefer to spend time apart?
As far as the Q7 goes, how do we know he wasn't seen driving it as a promotional thing? I don't know that he owns it, and from that, I can't jump to the conclusion he's got a pacel of kids to fill it. Just saying.
You know, it doesn't matter what some say, there are those who have it fixed in their mind and there is nothing that will ever change it so it's a waste of time to argue about it.
Life isn't perfect. People aren't perfect. There are changes in life and plans get disrupted.
I believe what I do but it's not based on a dream, a fantasy or merely Ted. There has been a lot of research with pictures and dates and accountings of whereabouts of both guys, not only them but their families from the internet.
Everyone is free to believe whatever they want. It's not something you can pound into somebody's head and force on them - everyone has to make up their own mind from what is presented.
Someday, I firmly believe we're going to see these 2 guys come out and they're going to have a family in tow.
Then why do you come out of the woodwork to lecture when some doubt the possibility? Just askin.
I believe what I do but it's not based on a dream, a fantasy or merely Ted.
Wrong, it's a fantasy based on ignoring facts and things we know and can see about Jake and Austin. There are no photos or anything that could support BT or BT x 3, there is no family or parental behavior, no proof or indications that Jake and Austin see each other at all.
Someday, I firmly believe we're going to see these 2 guys come out and they're going to have a family in tow.
So you would be OK with Jake and Austin being lousy parents, people who value money over their own kid(s)?
Jake G. must be laughing his ass off reading about his and his 3 children. LAMA.
#Oscars Countdown! We're just 11 days away!! Who's feeling excited?!
I'm not down with Jake hiding a kid. I've carried on quite a bit about how wrong it is. It's why however much you want to jump up and down and say Bomer is bad, I still find him good--he is seen out and about with his partner and the kids, even if he doesn't talk about it.
But I do think he is likely hiding one--but I haven't seen enough to believe in two more.
I'm just here because I like watching and talking about the Jake show, and talking about other actors, gay issues, etc.
Odd that the troll is over here going on and on about things discussed on OMG. They cant argue when they have to do so with an identity. If you are going to go on about Jake not being seen with Austin then how do you explain Jake never being seen on a date with a woman. Beards dont count.
There is NO BabyTILE!
Get over it.
PeeGee, you're gonna have to have your own baby then you can see if Jake and Austin wants to adopt the little thing if you want to see Jake and Austin with a baby.
Please oh please get a grip! PLEASE......
Each BT costs what... $300k just to conceive & carry? (remember, they're paying hush $ in addition to gestational carrying and doc bills.) Do these guys have that kind of $? These kids would need full time live in nannies, lots of security, etc etc.
Funny how pictures of Jake in LA pop up after Austin is back in NC. First pictures of Jake in awhile. None of the usual Jake at LA pictures either.
If you don't think Jake and Austin had some overlapping time in LA, then you're either blind, stupid, or willfully ignoring the games they are playing.
It is stuff like this that makes me think Jake and Austin are still together.
You keep ignoring months and months with Jake and Austin staying away and claim that a day or two in the same city is a proof they could be together.
They aren't playing any games, they aren't together for a long time.
February 16 - Jake Arriving At A Studio In Silver Lake
http://iheartjakemedia.com/thumbnails.php?album=1860
Not just "could be together", but "could be parents who are raising a kid"! "Had some overlapping time in LA" while Jake doesn't work is something we should be impressed with? Do you hear yourself?
If you are going to go on about Jake not being seen with Austin then how do you explain Jake never being seen on a date with a woman.
What Austin has to do with Jake's beards or being gay? Austin is NOT the only other gay in the world.
I generally like the ability to use crayons with my children's books, but that doesn't mean I don't enjoy My Uncle's Wedding, a 34-page read — released this week for kids aged 4-8 — that follows wee Andy as he attends the nuptials of Uncle Mike and Steve. I'll forgive author Eric Ross making use of the gay uncle stereotype (everyone has gay uncles, apparently, but not gay moms and dads), but only because Mike and Steve look so happy. It's $10.99, if you're interested. [MyUnclesWedding]
http://www.queerty.com/heather-might-have-two-mommies-but-andy-has-two-gay-uncles-getting-married-20110217/
^^^ Jake, I hope you will buy that book for Ramona and Matilda :)
FB sightings of Jake in Park Slope on Sunday and Monday, Austin arrived back in NC on Monday, there were no overlapping.
Paps don't hang out in Park Slope, he spenfs most of his time while in NY un Brooklyn, that's why you get the ocasional twitter and FB sightings and no pcs, L.A os crawling with paps so of course we are going to see pics.
Diamondstein Jake Gyllenhaal: you really need to step up your disguise when you go incognito in park slope. #shadesaintdoinit
9 minutes ago
February 13, 2011 10:17 PM
I wonder if Jake really is annoyed by the paps or is he just pretending to look annoyed, like he did when he was with Reese?
I think he's really annoyed, not in the mood for paparazzi.
6:58AM, you can repeat your BS ad nauseum, but we know that FB and Tweets are all fake.
7:25 AM - are you joking or serious?
7:25 AM - are you joking or serious?
OK, they are only fake when they don't fit our slash fantasy of Jake being with Austin.
LOL!!!!
The thing is the Jaustaloons must see the same FB and Tweet sightings as everyone else but choose to ignore them along with the fact that editing the OTH episode was finished on Sunday and Austin flew back to NC on Monday.
Jake was spotted in P. Slope with Maggie and Ramona on Sunday and solo on Monday, most likely he returned to L.A. on Tuesday, Austin was already back in NC
Anonymous said...
I think he's really annoyed, not in the mood for paparazzi.
February 17, 2011 7:22 AM
Really? Jake didn't seem annoyed in the US Weekly Thanksgiving pics he posed for. Nor did he seemed annnoyed for the Rome piggyback pics with Reese or the Paris weekend pics with Reese and her kids, or the other millions of photo ops he did. If he gets annoyed at the not scheduled pap pics that's to bad. Can't just use the paps when it suits him. He invited them in.
Bearding, arranged photo ops and posing for tabloids is working, doesn't mean he wants to be seen all the time. Tough luck, lol!
The thing is the Jaustaloons must see the same FB and Tweet sightings as everyone else but choose to ignore them
That's exactly right. The 'inconvenient' FB/Twitter sightings are never posted by SK. Her head goes straight into the sand like an ostrich.
The other thing they do is find a 24 hour period where Jake's whereabouts is unknown, and try and concoct some vague connection to Austin. They seem to forget that there are 8760 hours in a year!
8760 hours in a year? Minor details! :)
As far as the Q7 goes, how do we know he wasn't seen driving it as a promotional thing? I don't know that he owns it, and from that, I can't jump to the conclusion he's got a pacel of kids to fill it. Just saying.
Jake was interviewed last year and asked about his Swedish car and Jake said he drives an Audi now. It's his car. We've also seen it in several photos when he's gone for those coffee/breakfast dates of his in LA.
Are you saying that only parents drive cars like that? No dog owners, for example?
If anyone's seen an Audi Q7, they would take pause about Jake having not just one but two of them. Those vehicles are huge. Definitely, family transportation. Jake has had Atticus since 2004. Don't think he woke up one day last year and said, "Gee I need more leg space for my boy. Think I'll buy a 7 passenger vehicle!"
What kind of an Audi? Brad Pitt was promoting the new Q7 also.
and BTW, Audi isn't a Swedish car, it's German.
I think it's entirely possible that J&A have one child, maybe two - but definitely not three. Next it will be four and five. The little baby onesie might have been for a friend's child, or a relative's. It's irresponsible to have kid after kid after kid in today's world. Maybe they could adopt?
and BTW, Audi isn't a Swedish car, it's German.
If you read 9:07's post they said that Jake indicated that he didn't drive a Swedish car. He drives an Audi now. I read the same article so their recollection is correct.
Also,the person who mentioned that Brad Pitt has an Audi Q7 probably just helped to support the point that it's an attractive vehicle for those who are raising growing families. Not for swinging bachelors.
I don't believe it, sorry.
Maybe you could post the quote so we all can see it?
OK, they are only fake when they don't fit our slash fantasy of Jake being with Austin.
^^^^ CORRECT....
I think it's entirely possible that J&A have one child, maybe two - but definitely not three. Next it will be four and five. The little baby onesie might have been for a friend's child, or a relative's. It's irresponsible to have kid after kid after kid in today's world. Maybe they could adopt?
I know I'm enjoying this discussion. Intriguing. Guess it's not for us to judge. If true, it is pretty obvious those guys don't want to adopt. They want their own biological children.
On the bright side, I remember Jake said back in 2006 that he didn't want more than four children. Obviously, he had been thinking about this subject. When Ted brought up that Toothy was having a kid less than one year later, it now makes more sense why Jake had been thinking so precisely about the topic of being a father.
I have no idea where Jake was over the weekend, but no, I'm not going to assume random FB and Twitter sightings are all accurate.
Guys who look like Jake are a dime a dozen in hipster Brooklyn.
People also lie all the time about seeing celebs, they want to impress their friends.
Funny how none of these people seem to know how to use the camera on their phones.
And even if Jake and Austin were not in LA at the same time, doesn't it strike you as odd that two actors avoid being seen in LA at the same time. A city that someone keeps pointing out is the central location for their industry? It's the behavior of people with something to hide.
If anyone's seen an Audi Q7, they would take pause about Jake having not just one but two of them. Those vehicles are huge.
Please. It's just another nice and big car, the idea that only parents would buy it is too silly for words.
Maybe you could post the quote so we all can see it?
I'll be happy to check to see if I can find it on the Internet again. That's where I read it.
And even if Jake and Austin were not in LA at the same time, doesn't it strike you as odd that two actors avoid being seen in LA at the same time.
AVOID??? Jake doesn't work, there is NOTHING odd about him spending time with his family in NYC.
Please. It's just another nice and big car, the idea that only parents would buy it is too silly for words.
What is it with whoever it is who keeps distorting what people are writing. I don't believe anyone suggested that ONLY parents would buy a Q7. Just that this kind of vehicle would be designed for a target audience that makes a lot of money and probably has children. Jeez!
Really? Jake didn't seem annoyed in the US Weekly Thanksgiving pics he posed for. Nor did he seemed annnoyed for the Rome piggyback pics with Reese or the Paris weekend pics with Reese and her kids, or the other millions of photo ops he did. If he gets annoyed at the not scheduled pap pics that's to bad. Can't just use the paps when it suits him. He invited them in.
What are you talking about? You're talking about things that happened months and YEARS ago. Let me ask you, have you felt the same way everyday of your life or, do the average person feel the way they felt 4 years ago with lifes ups and downs, highs and low, great times and achievments? You sound like you're 12. How do you know if he's not feeling well? The answer is, you DON'T KNOW. So stop acting as if you do. YOU're just mad.
Find another hot Man star to make you feel good.
Funny how none of these people seem to know how to use the camera on their phones.
No, nothing funny or odd about that, NYC people aren't impressed by celebrities.
But it is funny how you don't believe tweets or FB sightings, but expect other people to believe your wishful thinking based on nothing about Jake and Austin spending last weekend in LA.
In today's world - having too many children and driving big cars is selfish. The world is overridden with humans.
You're talking about things that happened months and YEARS ago.
Jake posed for Us Weekly with his latest beard only 2,5 months ago.
I'd like to hear more about the kind of car(s) Jake and Austin drive.
9:35 AM - I'm more interested in Jake's motorcycle, how many kids can he drive on that thing?
I don't believe anyone suggested that ONLY parents would buy a Q7. Just that this kind of vehicle would be designed for a target audience that makes a lot of money and probably has children. Jeez!
That car is the only visible thing BT believers can use as "Jake has kids" argument, there is nothing else, so yes, some posters are suggesting that only parents would buy such car.
But the prevailing theory is that J&A have two Q7's - so with that logic they must have 15 little tiles running around! :)
15??? That bitch!
LOL!
Jake posed for Us Weekly with his latest beard only 2,5 months ago.
^^ So What? And your point is?
In today's world - having too many children and driving big cars is selfish. The world is overridden with humans.
Are you some kind of activist? So, don't YOU have any children and buy a mini car or ride a bike. Do your part, but don't get upset when other people live their lives the way they want to.
Take that logic and use it yourselve re Jake's life.
Jake posed for Us Weekly with his latest beard only 2,5 months ago.
^^ So What? And your point is?
My point is obvious - just 2,5 months ago Jake was smiling for paparazzi, NOT years ago.
That car is the only visible thing BT believers can use as "Jake has kids" argument, there is nothing else, so yes, some posters are suggesting that only parents would buy such car.
Who suggested that only parents would buy such a car? Nobody. But, it is a vehicle that I don't see too many single men without children wanting to have. There's a Q5 that's geared more toward their lifestyle.
Justin Timberlake supposedly has one. Must be for his large family.
I was going to mention Justin. Jake is also seen riding other types of cars and I swear that the Audi at one point had a lease sticker on it.
The Jaustaloons have their heads in the sand , I saw the FB sightings of Jake, Ramona and Maggie for instance at some restauraunt in Brooklyn on Sunday and a sighting of him getting coffee on Monday. I also saw that Austin returned to NC on Monday and yet they are trying to say that they spent Valentines day together, on which planet???
The remind me of the LOTR loons obsessed with Elijah Wood and Dominic Monaghan except they had a lot more fans, Jake's fandom is dwindling which is a good thing because
But the prevailing theory is that J&A have two Q7's - so with that logic they must have 15 little tiles running around! : )
Jake has had two cars (one grey and one black) for at least 5 years now. One theory is that one car is Austin's. If they have children, the extra seating capacity would be needed not just for baby seats/strollers and a family or friend, but nannies as well.
Sorry, but blogger is not taking links, but here is the interview Jake gave where he said he has an Audi now:
Audi not a Volvo
http://www.expressen.se/noje/film/1.1997891/jake-gyllenhaal-langtar-till-sverige
And, here is the English discussion on Wet, Dark and Wild back on June 8, 2010:
http://www.wetdarkandwild.com/2010/06/jake-gyllenhaal-international-man-of.html
I think it's very lovely if J&A have kids, Volvos, Audis, motorcycles, even tandem bicycles built for two (or three, or four, etc). But I don't like to carry on about it ad nauseam. He makes movies occasionally too. I don't think Ted has made mention of a third child, has he?
10:32 AM - you think it is very lovely to hide kids, deny their existence and not care about providing them basic things like spending time with parents? Really?
I don't think Ted has made mention of a third child, has he?
Ted mentioned only one BT.
There are no kids, the jaustaloons desperate spinning by linking to interviews where Jake says he has an Audi (Gasp!) shows their desperation.
Lot's of Actor's have Audi's it's the in car to have now. If he was seen with 2 I suspect one was on loan while his was being repaired.
Um, how do people search for "Facebook sightings"? Don't most people keep their profiles private?
Why would most people keep their profiles private?
There are no kids, the jaustaloons desperate spinning by linking to interviews where Jake says he has an Audi (Gasp!) shows their desperation.
Excuse me, but someone asked for a link to the article and I provided it. You are rude and it seems to me frothing at the mouth like a rabid dog about the possibility of Jake having children. Your only proof that Jake doesn't have children is because you say so. I don't even know what a jaustaloon is but it sure shows me not only your immaturity, but your inability to carry on a civil discussion.
Your only proof that Jake doesn't have children is because you say so.
Sorry,
the only "proof" that Jake has a kid is Ted's gossip.
the only "proof" that Jake has a kid is Ted's gossip.
Wrong. This just shows how you have an agenda. Over the past few days there has been lots of discussions that have pointed to Jake having children. Never mind the 3 years of posts over at OMG and the FanChitChat Room. The baby stroller in Paris, the frequent Medical Building visits beginning in 2007, the paparazzi video taunting Jake like they got the picture they wanted, the reverse footprint of a baby's foot, the timing of the bearding with Reese and the coming out in Rome in October , 2007 just when BT1 was supposed to have been born, Jake's slipping on Regis and Kelly that Maggie had a niece, the Audi Q7 family vehicle...it goes on and on. Of course, you will have an excuse for each clue. But, there are those who are interested so that's why I'm sharing the information.
Excuse me, but someone asked for a link to the article and I provided it. You are rude and it seems to me frothing at the mouth like a rabid dog about the possibility of Jake having children. Your only proof that Jake doesn't have children is because you say so. I don't even know what a jaustaloon is but it sure shows me not only your immaturity, but your inability to carry on a civil discussion.
No worries, my friend. The idiot who keeps being snarky is our resident Internet trolly, Jack. He obviously has come out of his dark hole again. Thank you for the links. Very interesting stuff.
Last weekend I went hiking up on Mt. Tamalpais in Marin County with a guy I have just started dating. We passed the tourist lookout and found a secluded spot up front. Of course, nature took over and we started making out like crazy.
Several minutes later, we looked up and realized that the entire tourist crowd was looking down at us - our spot wasn't secluded after all! We both laughed and as we walked past the tourist lookout, many people were smiling at us - some seemed deliriously happy and one straight guy gave us a thumbs up!
http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2011/02/new-normal.html
I can't believe anyone in their right mind believes Jake has a child, much less two or three. He is spoiled, immature, lazy, always tagging along after his sister and brother in law or famous women. He has an obvious need for attention to be directed at him, hence the famewhoring with Reeke and Swift. People who have children, especially via surrogate, don't behave like him. He is not a responsible man with a child or a family of his own, he is a lost boy in a man's body.
This thing has really taken on a life of its own, so much so that some don't even need Ted's gossip anymore for J&A to be reproducing exponentially.
The baby stroller in Paris, the frequent Medical Building visits beginning in 2007, the paparazzi video taunting Jake like they got the picture they wanted, the reverse footprint of a baby's foot, the timing of the bearding with Reese and the coming out in Rome in October , 2007 just when BT1 was supposed to have been born, Jake's slipping on Regis and Kelly that Maggie had a niece, the Audi Q7 family vehicle...it goes on and on. Of course, you will have an excuse for each clue.
The baby stroller in Paris - maybe, nothing conclusive.
The frequent Medical Building visits beginning in 2007 - nothing to do with babies, Jake can't get pregnant and only a total moron would use such public building for anything that has to do with his super secret baby.
The paparazzi video taunting Jake like they got the picture they wanted - lol, that must be about Jake's kids!
The reverse footprint of a baby's foot - Jake's friends and family have babies.
The timing of the bearding with Reese and the coming out in Rome in October - you forgot about Rendition? First time parent would stay away from his newly born?
Jake's slipping on Regis and Kelly that Maggie had a niece - that never happened.
Audi Q7 family vehicle - too silly for words.
Of course, you will have an excuse for each clue - you expect people to ignore facts, logic and common sense? Of course you do because that is the only way to believe that Jake has a family with Austin.
poor troll. tries every lame excuse in the book but none of them have any impact or credibility. Baby tile(s)still exist, Jake is gay and Jake and Austin are still together.
The frequent Medical Building visits beginning in 2007
Wasn't there a rumor Jake was/is in therapy? During PoP promo he mentioned depression in an interview.
aby tile(s)still exist, Jake is gay and Jake and Austin are still together.
Sure, that is why Jake and Austin aren't in the same place at the same time - because they are parents who raise kids together! Makes perfect sense!
I can't believe anyone in their right mind believes Jake has a child, much less two or three. He is spoiled, immature, lazy, always tagging along after his sister and brother in law or famous women.
Wow! You sure have a high opinion of Jake. Frankly, I loved Jake for years and then he suddenly seemed to change in 2007, when he hooked up with Reese Witherspoon. Suddenly, that was a Jake I did not recognize. I was furious with him for quite a while, wondering what had happen to my taste, until I came upon Ted's Toothy BI in late 2008. Now, that I've be watching this charade play out for over two years, I get it. Jake hasn't changed. He's just hiding his true self and life away from the world. Hope he changes his mind in the future. He's a beautiful, intelligent, funny, charming, and thoughtful man. Very talented too. It doesn't hurt that he is amazingly good looking either. Did you see those photos of him in LA today? And, by the way, how did he sneak back into LA without anyone noticing? And, most importantly why did he not want anyone to know when he arrived?
Jake's slipping on Regis and Kelly that Maggie had a niece - that never happened.
Oh, yes it did. Sorry.
The frequent Medical Building visits beginning in 2007 - nothing to do with babies, Jake can't have babies.
Now, that's just stupid. First off, saying it aint' so doesn't make it so. And, fathers go for checkups with their girlfriends, wifes, and one would think surrogates too.
The timing of the bearding with Reese and the coming out in Rome in October - you forgot about Rendition? First time parent would stay away from his newly born?
Rendition had already opened in the U.S. when the "coming out" in Rome occurred on October 23. The movie had already proved to be one huge flop. No reason to hookup with Reese afterwards and for over two years. Are you trying to tell me that they were still trying to get people to go see Rendition? You really are too funny.
The loons on OMG also post on FanChitChat, the same fangirls that were obsessed with Dom and Elijah from LOTR.
The thing is even the loons don't believe there are any babies or even believe they are together anymore despite what they post on a public blog.
Just a bunch of middle aged fangirls desperate for attentio and refusting to admit that Ed is laughing his flabby ass off over their lunancy.
PS: Not all FB accounts are set to privacy. Also some tweets have FB links, some have both accounts and you can follow and figure out how to check out the sightings.
That's why they aren't linked because there are some loons that would harass the FB person, sort of like how Jake' Mom has harassed whrn the loons found out that she was still friended to Reese.
11:58: No closet case that wants to make secret babies would ever go to that BH clinic crawling with PR, there are tons of private places inL.A. to go, you make no sense.
Jake goes there for the same reasons other celebs go there: check ups, prescritions, etc. If there is a pettrern he may be getting treaments, therapy, etc.
^^^^^^^^
crawling with paps
The paparazzi video taunting Jake like they got the picture they wanted - lol, that must be about Jake's kids!
Yes, I suspect there is a high probability that they got the money shot. The paps were ecstatic and kept saying, "You're too late, you're too late." They obviously got a picture they knew they could sell. What kind of pic might garner such a fee? Jake getting into his car? Jake smiling? Jake eating lunch? I suspect they were laying in wait for him for a reason.
Jake goes there for the same reasons other celebs go there: check ups, prescritions, etc. If there is a pettrern he may be getting treaments, therapy, etc.
Why wasn't he seen regularly going to the Medical Building before 2007 then? It's not just the going, is the frequency and the timing in which these trips started to occur.
tries every lame excuse in the book but none of them have any impact or credibility
There is no credibility in any of those BT arguments and I'm sure you know that. So why do you continue to act like BT speculations are not just speculations?
The loons on OMG also post on FanChitChat, the same fangirls that were obsessed with Dom and Elijah from LOTR.
And, your evidence of that is? Oh, that's right because you say so. For someone so concerned about evidence, you seem to absolve yourself of the same rigorous standard, don't you? Double standard, I think you call it.
Oh please, if that was the case they would have sold it and wouldn't be there still taunting him.
The too late chant was probably because he was too late to hide or run into the parking lot like he sometimes does or go back into the building. He probably was told to park there to avoid the paps and he didn't "Too Late"!!!
Sorry fangirl, there are no outing pics being sat on for almost 2 years by fat, drug addicted paps lurking in alleys.
The paparazzi video taunting Jake like they got the picture they wanted
Which video was that? When? Where?
For someone so concerned about evidence
I don't expect evidence of BT, but I expect people to have some sense.
BT believers insist on posting insane "arguments" to support their speculations while they insist on ignoring facts about Jake and Austin.
12:10 Maybe he developed some kind of condition like the rumored herpes, a chronic skin condition, therapy, all could have developed during that time.
I can't believe that grown women would think that a closet case wanting to make babies left and right and hide them would want to visit that pap invfested clinic when he has so many options.
That only happens in fanfic because it's easy to write shit like that.
Also I think there is some weird projection going on here: you can't for whatever reason have kids and that you have no one in your life so you fantasise that there are 2 people that re together forever and have kids, ehy you choose these to turds are a mytery.
There is no credibility in any of those BT arguments and I'm sure you know that. So why do you continue to act like BT speculations are not just speculations?
Okay, I've been paying attention to this discussion for two days now. Time to give my two cents. I do think there is a lot of merit to the argument that Jake may have children and is with this Austin guy. The other person (Jack?) who keeps attacking has no evidence either. They just keep name calling and saying that people are loons. The other people posting seem to have amassed a lot specifics that I wasn't aware of before. Don't see what the big deal is about. People think it's bad that Jake's a father? I don't like if he's keeping this from the public, but I'm sure he is a loving Dad, if he has children.
12:14 a video from about 2 years ago when he was with Reese. 2 coked up paps were sitting in a van in the alley where Jake and other celebs go waiting for celebs to come out. Jake comes out to get in his car and sees them and they screech too late, too late, he smirks and drives off.
If they got "the money shot" they would not still be sitting in their van. If they wanted a pic of him getting in his car they got it, so no money shot.
12:21: Get lost and stop calling people calling you out on your slash Jack or troll.
There are no kids.
I do think there is a lot of merit to the argument that Jake may have children and is with this Austin guy.
Why do you believe Jake is still with Austin? Because you believe that last 329 sightings and photos are faked so Jake and Austin aren't spending 95% of their time apart?
Thanks 12:23 PM. So there is no way that was about BT, absolutely no reason to think that.
The paparazzi video taunting Jake like they got the picture they wanted
Which video was that? When? Where?
Sorry. I didn't know someone asked for the video link of the paps taunting Jake. Here's the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0KSt2nyvUE
Jake and Austin broke up over a year ago. They were off and on for most of 2009. They still see each other, but not often. Ted knows this, and his gossip and BB Q&A correlate. Earlier this year, he threw out a red herring about it - do two people in love ever really break up - and some people think that means J&A are still together. They're not. If there is a child, it's not at all apparent which one of them are primarily raising the child. Don't think it's Jake, I don't care how many Audi Q7s he has.
I think most of the talk on here about there being more than one child are from people trying to be provocative, or as some have suggested, they're deeply committed to their slash fiction storyline. That's fine. They're just having fun with it. You people who get angry and defensive about it are just as loony.
12:21: Get lost and stop calling people calling you out on your slash Jack or troll.
Prophecy Girl then. Isn't she in tight, or thinks she is, with Stephen Gyllenhaal?
Sorry. I didn't know someone asked for the video link of the paps taunting Jake. Here's the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0KSt2nyvUE
Thanks! I'll repeat myself: there is no way that was about BT, absolutely no reason to think that.
Jake and Austin broke up over a year ago. They were off and on for most of 2009. They still see each other, but not often. Ted knows this, and his gossip and BB Q&A correlate. Earlier this year, he threw out a red herring about it - do two people in love ever really break up - and some people think that means J&A are still together. They're not. If there is a child, it's not at all apparent which one of them are primarily raising the child. Don't think it's Jake, I don't care how many Audi Q7s he has.
Then why did Jake just perform another elaborate smoke and mirrors cover story, pretending he was in Brookyn, Nashville, NY, when we now know that he magically popped up in LA. Interesting how all of this was right before Valentine's Day too. Bottom line, I think Destiny suggested it, if they broke up why is it still so important that Jake and Austin never be in LA together at the same time?
Also, Ted mentioned something last year about the boys pulling a Bullock. When someone wrote back and said are you suggesting they are going to break up, he said something like them thinking about it but not doing it.
That's fine. They're just having fun with it. You people who get angry and defensive about it are just as loony.
LMAO!
People who believe Jake has 3 kids and people who believe that can't be true are equally loony??????????????
Then why did Jake just perform another elaborate smoke and mirrors cover story, pretending he was in Brookyn, Nashville, NY, when we now know that he magically popped up in LA.
Quit playing stupid.
There are tweets / sightings of Jake in NYC on Sunday and Monday.
There are LA pictures of Jake from Wednesday.
You call that "magically popped up in LA"???
Why do you believe Jake is still with Austin? Because you believe that last 329 sightings and photos are faked so Jake and Austin aren't spending 95% of their time apart?
I'm not going to repeat myself. For those who are interested they will come to their own conclusions. And, yes there are hundreds of fake sightings and photos (a la Thanksgiving with Swifty and the frozen leaf). When you can prove that Jake and Austin are apart 95% of the time, maybe I'll pay attention. Your certainty already is mind boggling.
pretending he was in Brookyn, Nashville, NY
When?
1:07 You are just pissed because there are no new Jaustaloon pics for you to get your undies wet over.
Jake ofen flies back and forth w/o notice, he gets papped at LAX and JFK because that's where the paps hang, there are other airports not just LAX.
The need to linked them no matter what is creepy and just proves that the jaustaloons know they are not together, otherwise they wouldn't be spinning.
They have their seperate lives, no need to pretend or hide, they aren't together and coud care less where the other is and travel freely visiting their own seperate freinds and family.
Quit playing stupid.
There are tweets / sightings of Jake in NYC on Sunday and Monday.
There are LA pictures of Jake from Wednesday.
You call that "magically popped up in LA"???
I'm not the same poster but I think they are right. Tweets are notoriously suspect and Jake's people can plant them as well. Jake didn't want us to know when he flew back into LA. That's why there' no LAX photos. But, he sure wanted us to see when he came back from Australia and Nashville didn't he? Jake let's us see what he wants us to. Being in the closet, he is a master manipulator.
When you can prove that Jake and Austin are apart 95% of the time, maybe I'll pay attention.
Still insisting on insulting everyone's intelligence?
YOU have ZERO evidence that Jake and Austin are seeing each other.
There are tweets, sightings and photos posted on this blog that put Jake and Austin apart for 95% of last year.
So you want people to believe your wishful thinking and ignore all info we have as fake and invalid. How crazy is that?
That's why there' no LAX photos.
So how do you know when Jake was back in LA if there are no photos? How do you know that Sunday and Monday NYC sightings are fake?
You don't, you are just making things us.
^^ making things up
^^ I believe they are fake because there were too many high pofile, obviously planted PR stories swirling around Jake being with Mulligan, Aniston, Mumford and Sons, etc. after he arrived for the Three Sisters opening. He looked sick to me, but suddenly he was everywhere, healthy as could be, and being shipped with this woman then that one. The stories, including the one with Aniston had all kinds of holes in it. So that's why.
Sorry. I didn't know someone asked for the video link of the paps taunting Jake. Here's the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0KSt2nyvUE
Thank you, whoever posted this. I've never seen this video before. It does look like they got a picture that Jake would not want to be taken. Whoa. That really is something.
That really is something.
Picture of Jake getting in the car is "something"? This is the first time Jake wasn't happy to see paparazzi? What?
obviously planted PR stories swirling around Jake being with Mulligan, Aniston, Mumford and Sons
How are tweets and sightings of Jake with Marcus "obviously planted"?
Why should we believe that Jake wasn't in Nashville?
Where was he?
You know when the trollies get worked up that they think something is amiss.
Who knows if Jake was in Nashville. But I am beginning to have serious doubts that he was in NY for Jen's birthday. People doesn't mention him being there, only US, which seems to be Jake's go-to rag. No photos, you'd think he'd want to be seen having dinner with his good friend on her birthday.
There were no photos of Jen with anyone of her guests.
When I go to LA I always fly into Burbank. It's a low-key airport, never seen paps there, and it's much closer to the Hollywood Hills where Jake lives than LAX.
Pretty sure if the pap "Angello" had gotten the coveted shot of Jake with said Baby Tile, Jake would have been offering him a wad of cash, not blowing him off. KWIM?
Right, he's going to start flashing money on camera.
I'm sure there are photos that stars don't want seen, and some kind of informal process for buying them up.
Post a Comment