***
Between courses at the Ravagh Persian Grill in Manhattan (his choice), he pulls out from under his T-shirt the two chains that hang around his neck. Each has a ring at its end - one is a black diamond, the other a pendant of Saint Genesius, patron saint of actors - and he starts rolling them between his fingers. But he almost seems alarmed when I ask about them, as though he hasn't been aware of what he has been doing. A diner from another table comes over.
"Can I say hi to you?" she asks.
"Yes, you can," he says.
"Oh, my gosh," she says. "You're my favorite."
"Oh no," he says. "Oh, don't say that. You say that to everybody."
"No!" she protests. "I love The Brokenback Mountain. I really did love it. I watched it three times."
Brokenback Mountain. Once she recedes, he turns to me and says, "You don't want to know the variations of that title." He tells me how, just the other day, a lawyer asked him how he got into acting at such a young age. "I think at first I was just ambitious," he says. "It was blind ambition. I wanted to be out there. I mean, I remember watching my sister up onstage doing South Pacific when we were kids and going, 'That looks like a fucking lot of fun.'" He debates with himself. "Was it attention? Probably, but I think it was more the magic. It's magic, some of what happens in movies. I mean, people asked me many times through the experience of Brokeback Mountain what that was like. And the best way I can describe it is what we all carry with ourselves from that experience, and why we feel so close. Forget all the awards that come, with people kind of adorning each other - it wasn't about that. There was something magical in that time. We all slept in our trailers out by a trailer park the first month of making that movie. I was sleeping next to Ang's trailer; Ang's trailer was next to Heath and Michelle's trailer - they'd kind of moved in together. And Michael Hausman, the producer, brought his Airstream trailer down. And it was just us, by this river, for a month. And we would walk to set, and we would eat together, and we would all make coffee in the morning, and I would wake up in the morning and there would be Ang Lee doing Tai Chi outside of my trailer, and it was just magical. It was just magical."
To promote the movie, the cast appeared together on Oprah. For the first half of the show, it was just Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger fending off Winfrey's enthusiasm and curiosity. There is a sheen cast over the movie now - to some extent because of its subject matter but mostly because of Ledger's death - that leaves it and anything connected to it frozen, untouchable. So rewatching the two actors on Oprah, I was surprised to see Gyllenhaal alluding to times that the two of them didn't get on during the filming. Gyllenhaal seems surprised, too, when I mention this, as if he wasn't aware this was something he'd shared. But he remembers. The scene with the two of them by the river, for instance.
"Where Heath's character goes into how his father knew of two guys who lived together and he ended up seeing them killed and dead. I had always read it in a certain way. I heard it in my mind a certain way. And I had worked with these incredible actors like Dustin Hoffman and Susan Sarandon. When I worked with Dustin, he would always do things to me; in between a take, he would stop his lines, and he'd be like, 'You're a wonderful person,' or horrible things sometimes to jar me... getting a different response. And so I decided in this scene to gather the gumption" - this was when Ledger's part of the scene was being filmed and Gyllenhaal was off-camera - "and I don't subscribe to this really, changing lines on an actor, because I don't think I'm Dustin Hoffman, and I don't think I have the ability or the talent to do that to somebody. But I do think that changing intention sometimes on an actor when you're doing a scene when you're not on-camera is really interesting for them. But I did it at one point in this one scene, and I'd always heard it a certain way, so I was almost trying to move the scene to that place for him. He delivered the whole thing very, very straight, and he could feel me trying to do that, and I remember him getting really upset with me. And I remember him turning to Ang at the end of it and going, 'If he wants to tell me what to do, have him tell you'... We had these kind of exchanges, you know. But ultimately, the way I look at it was I was wrong, because he was brilliant. But at the same time I think, "Well, if I hadn't, would it have gone a certain way?" We balanced each other out. When I think about these things that happened then, we were very much alive in that movie. We were really living that movie. Not literally, but you think about those times in your life..."
One thing Gyllenhaal would do - feeding off the way Ledger had chosen to play the part of Ennis quietly, his teeth clenched - was to ask him in character, "What? What'd you say?" "Stupid me," Gyllenhaal comments now.
Did Heath never do anything that annoyed you?
"No. I always admired Heath. I always was kind of enamored by him, you know. I mean, yeah, sometimes it was hard to sit with him. He moved... He was a mover."
People have since suggested that he was really, really troubled by having to do all that promotion and campaigning. Was that your sense?
"Yeah. He was very sensitive. He didn't always really have a sense of performance in his everyday life. He was who he was. I think actors very often, they know how to present something, and that's part of their job. I think he was just really sensitive. We often used to do a lot of things together, because people were very interested in him and I think we felt safe together."
For example, he says that when he and Ledger had to introduce Ang Lee at the Directors Guild awards, Ledger refused point-blank to say anything jokey about Lee, as might have been expected at such an event. Their introduction was consequently so serious and earnest, says Gyllenhaal, that when Lee came up to the stage, he told them, "That was so gay."
Still, he also remembers how much they'd be laughing backstage at events: "For such a serious actor as Heath was, he was crazy funny. Dark funny, but funny." Out front, they came to be sobered by people's reactions, as they realized that the movie was bigger than all of them, bigger than they'd realized. Gyllenhaal tells me a strange thing about the filming, an experience he'd just rhapsodized about as so magical: "In retrospect, it just was a painful process." As though there's no reason why both memories should not be equally true. "I don't think any of us can watch it to this day," he says. "I remember talking to Michelle very recently and her being like, 'I didn't know if it was any good or not.'"
Afterward, he and Ledger stayed in close touch. "We'd talk a few times a month. I mean, he was a friend. He was like my creative partner." The news of Ledger's death came while Gyllenhaal was filming Brothers.
Could you make any sense of it at all?
A lengthy pause. "I don't really like talking about it. That period of time was... It was difficult."
What effect do you think it had on you?
"Even when we did Brokeback and stuff, it was like my work was the only thing that mattered to me. It was like I could only understand or define myself through doing that. Life, I didn't totally understand. And I think I was afraid of life. And I had success in my work, enough success that you could keep going back there. But after that happened... I think I recognized that it was work. And I recognized that this is for real."
"This" being life?
"It's for real."
What were you scared of?
"It seems to me that there are some people who go, 'All right, I'm grabbing the bull by the horns. Let's do this...,' and there are some people who it takes a while to figure out. It's an everyday struggle to be able to go, 'I'm going to follow my own instincts - I'm going to try and hear my own heart regardless...' We're getting pretty deep here. I mean, there are things that I want in my life. You can hide in your work, I guess I'm saying, or you can be alive and free and live in your work. You can pretend the people that you're going to work with for however many months are going to be the family that's going to be forever. But the truth is, they're not. And no matter what relationships you make along the way - which have been occasionally really, really influential in my life – ultimately I choose all the mishegoss, and all the complication and confusions of life, which takes courage and patience to sift through. Over the temporary moment of 'Oh, I'm comforted in the womb of this family.' I choose the other. I hate to say this, but - "Gyllenhaal smiles - "it's time to jump."
***
There is a famous scene in Brokeback Mountain where Ledger's and Gyllenhaal's characters jump together off a cliff into a river, both of them naked.
In reality, Ledger made the jump but Gyllenhaal did not. Originally the leap was to have been from a lower ledge, but Ledger wanted to go from right at the top. They were told how careful they would have to be, falling from that height, because they might hit the river's shallow bottom, and they were also warned of the hazards presented by the glacial water. Gyllenhaal realized he wasn't so sure about it. He had just been cast in Jarhead, and that shoot was starting soon. He knew that if he injured himself, he would lose the part. And he was comforted by a precedent: he remembered a story he had heard in his youth, about how Paul Newman, a family friend, hadn't actually made the leap in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. He decided to let a stand-in jump in his stead.
I ask him whether Ledger didn't, after all they had been through together, say to him, "You're wimping out on this?"
"It's interesting - he never did say that. I would have loved for him to have said that."
Would it have made you feel bad?
"Maybe. Yeah, probably. But I was actually really, really proud of myself that I didn't do it. For me, it was a great triumph. You know, there's a pressure that people put on themselves to not trust their instincts. You know, show the stunt guys I can do it, prove it to this person, prove it to that person. Who do I need to prove it to? And Heath didn't do it for any of those reasons - he did it because he wanted to jump."
Do you at all regret not doing it now?
"Yeah. But that's me now."
***
Source: GQ, May 2010 - interviewed by Chris Heath
2,745 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 1401 – 1600 of 2745 Newer› Newest»but as for Toothy and his hubby go
Does anyone know when Ted first referred to Grey Goose as "hubby"?
Poll counted:
Yes: 5 opinions
No: 9 opinions
I have no control over whether people expressed their opinion twice, only the owner of this blog can really say.
It's not just Ted that made me believe in BT--I was a skeptic and ran hot and cold on the topic, one minute believing it, one minute thinking that nobody could be so callous as to hide their own child.
I agree. Along with Reeke, Jake's sudden obsession with privacy over the past 2.5 years, and changing from an economically green Prius in 2007 to a large dark tinted windowed van in his family-sized van by early 2008.
Jake never owned a Prius. But going back to his old Mercedes, all his vehicles have had tinted windows. Nothing new there.
Poll counted:
Yes: 5 opinions
No: 9 opinions
We all know that Democracy is not a full proof system, nor the arbiter of ultimate truth. After all, George Bush was elected for two terms, wasn't he?
We had Zachary Stains singing Hercules in nude an opera by Vivaldi, now we have Roberto Bolle dancing Mats Ek's choreography for Giselle in nude ... They put something in the water in Italy ;)
Picturing poor BT waiting all day for Jake to come back to the trailer.
BT can learn how to "wait patiently" just like I did.
I thought van belonged to Reese if i'm not mistaken. I have seen him driving other cars since then and they weren't vans. He was in a black van in the Doctor pics, he was getting in the passenger side. I think a lot of the cars he drives now are leases IMO.
The privacy thing was due to death threats he was getting shortly after Heath died and he didn't say anything in public I heard.
I have no control over whether people expressed their opinion twice, only the owner of this blog can really say.
Oops, sorry. I "voted" that I didn't believe in BT - but then I did reiterate that in the ensuing conversation, so that probably throws the numbers off.
Jake never owned a Prius
Ecologically aware Jake
The privacy thing was due to death threats he was getting shortly after Heath died and he didn't say anything in public I heard
I don't believe for one minute he received death threats over that. And I don't understand the "privacy" thing that's being referred to. He was seen with Reese in public constantly after Heath died - and he didn't always have a bodyguard.
Yeah that article may say Prius, but Jake's green car of choice was a Toyota Camry Hybrid. There are plenty of pics on IHJ of it. Strangely, none of him tooling around in his "Prius".
Prius was PR BS, never saw him driving one. The tinted car windows started before the alleged birth of BT.
Jake uses his BG in situations that are normal like press and appearences to promote films. I've seen his BG at WonderCon and the pics of him at the airport on friday which means he was in Montreal with Jake while filming and at the hockey game.
I thought van belonged to Reese if i'm not mistaken.
Jake has been seen driving a window tinted van post Reeke on many occasions. Example: The night of February 16 when paps captured him driving off with an unidentified male after a concert with Jeff Bridges and Friends at an L.A. Club with Elton John.
Sadly I do think J&A are the kinds who would do that to their own child. Hell, Jake spent three years bearding with Reese, isn't that pretty much proof that he'll do anything including selling his own mother? jake in particular is immature, insecure, needy and looking for attention no matter how he has to get it, and wants more than anything in the world to be a big star.
I also think he is arrogant enough to think he can get away with all this, that somehow he can hide BT forever, or that BT will turn out normal despite being a prisoner in his own home.
You are so correct Destiny. People wont admit you are right though. They will jump on you and say how mean you are to precious Jake. I think me and you arent here to babysit little Jakey but are digusted with his lies and deceit.
mattypop39: Just met Jake Gyllenhaal! Omfg Fit as fuck!!! I want him to sit on my face lol!
OMG LMAO. Maybe if Matty put on a Heath wig and drank a raspberry mint julep he might've gotten asked to hang out. Btw who was the hater here who said Twitter comments and sightings about Jake are boring and unnecessary?! Jeezus, loosen up man. Enjoy the ride.
Tile jr.
BT, can now mean Baby Toddler
Forget Baby Tile or Baby Toddler. At 2, 2.5 years old it's Baby Terrible.
Jake has been seen driving a window tinted van post Reeke on many occasions. Example: The night of February 16 when paps captured him driving off with an unidentified male after a concert with Jeff Bridges and Friends at an L.A. Club with Elton John.
Well, I admit I don't keep up on this stuff as well as a lot of you - but was that a "family-size van" or an SUV? Because there's a big difference between the two. I know lots of childless people who drive SUVs. And I'll bet a lot of celebs have tinted windows.
Maybe if Matty put on a Heath wig and drank a raspberry mint julep he might've gotten asked to hang out
LOL. Yeah, and if they happen to have a mutual friend, his chances are even better!
Wow, it's truly amazing how everyone is jumping on the vehicle bag wagon to disprove that Jake never drove a Prius. The amount of protests are trully extraordinary. I wonder what they are so shaken up about? I don't follow Jake that much, and even I know he used to drive around town in a Prius. All I can say, is the blog response was very interesting. Including, trying to make a fine distinction between an SUV and a family-sized van. Give me a break. I even know what the poster was trying to communicate. That suddenly in 2008single man Jake needed more room for maybe an addition to the famiy. Sometimes how people react to a seemingly innocuous statement says alot about its potential significance. I just did a quick search of google and there were several entries of Jake with a Prius. Hmmm.
IMO Jake is attracted to gay guys who are (don't rag on me for this) more masculine looking and acting. If Matty came off as the queen he seems to be in his Twitter profile I doubt Jake would have responded positively; it's more like he would completely ignore him. I don't have a link but maybe some of you will remember when an effeminate-sounding gay barista blogged/tweeted that he flirted with Jake at a cafe and although he and Jake made the "connection" that both were gay, Jake ignored him and then made a point of saying something like "Are you paying for this one, babe?" to Reese. IMO Jake is naturally attracted to more straight-seeming guys but he also knows that if he hung out with gay-seeming ones it would be a dead giveaway of his orientation. IMO he avoids twinks and queens like the plague.
Including, trying to make a fine distinction between an SUV and a family-sized van.
ffs, talk about being paranoid. I have no idea whether Jake drove a Prius - maybe he did and I wouldn't for one minute argue against that. But I'm the one who asked the question about whether it was a family size van or an SUV. It's not a "fine" distinction and I think it's a fair question because full 'family size' vans are generally not driven by single guys (unless it's work related), but SUVs commonly are. Besides, I hardly think Jake - or any celeb for that matter - has only one vehicle.
Can you post a picture of him driving a Prius 7:43. I have only seen him driving a Mercedes and a Toyota Camry hybrid and him in a SUVs that belonged to Reese (Mercedes GLK I think) He also leasewd a lot of cars over the years.
Nobody is shaken up it's just that we have never seen it unlike the others.
PR blurbs about clients mean shit.
I think not having a photo of something means shit too. Especially, when there are so many citations on the Internet referring to Jake with a Prius.
LOL re "fine distinction" between an SUV and a family size van. If any of you have gone on a driving vacation and reserved a family size van but got stuck crammed into an SUV you'd know there's a big unfuckingbelieveable difference.
^ Forgot to add that just because there are no photos of Jake f*cking men doesn't mean that he's not in alignment with the tooth fairy.
P.S. It's a wonder we didn't kill each other. We had a crying sick screaming baby, two people with hives, one with a raging migraine (me) and another with sudden motion sickness and no Dramamine. We laugh about it now but shit it was awful! At least with a van everyone could have had their own bench seat lol
There are definitely pics of Jake driving a Prius but IIRC it was Kiki's and it was awhile ago. He definitely had his hybrid Camry(s). Maybe he leased a Prius lately or was given one to use while the Camry was being maintained? As for driving or using larger vehicles, so what, he's been papped doing that too lately as well as when he was Reeking. IMO the vehicles near him, i.e. in the med center parking lots, are what we need to pay attention to - the "CIA" undercover op dark colored tinted window cars with baby seats in the back.
Experience tells me that when someone continues to belabor a point based on one single word by ignoring the validity of the rest of the argument, that particular someone is trying to distract and confuse. The original post indicated van, probably meant SUV. In any event, having a screaming baby doesn't detract from the original poster's point. Maybe one of the other reason's Jake got together with Reesy-poo is that he needed a larger vehicle and would have to explain the sudden shift from eco-green conscious, footloose and fancy free, single man Jake to sensible SUV/VAN Jake. The fact that he still drives one, speaks volumes.
IMO the vehicles near him, i.e. in the med center parking lots, are what we need to pay attention to - the "CIA" undercover op dark colored tinted window cars with baby seats in the back.
EXACTLY!
Babytile is the single biggest mistake that Ted has ever made in his gossip rag career. It was fed to him to pollute Toothy tile and he can''t back away from it. Some pr flack is laughing her/his ass off.
What a joke.
RosalinWriter: River Phoenix and Martha Plimpton in Running on Empty -- a case of beauty and the beast! Can't believe Jake Gyllenhaal had a crush on her.
2 minutes ago
Have been V boring today catching up with shopping, washing blah blah blah. Now in Claridges waiting for mates. Prepare for drunken tweets!!
about 9 hours ago
Jake Gylenhall in Claridges OMG!!!!!! In shorts after running OMG !!!
about 7 hours ago
I've left broken hearted without jake! Onwards and upward and off for dinner xx
about 6 hours ago
http://twitter.com/MarkHeyes
Can't believe Jake Gyllenhaal had a crush on her.
Another person buying the PR crap about a vagina loving Jake. They forgot to mention that the article indicated that Jake knew he loved girls when he was 5 years old because of his "attraction" to Martha. What a bucket full of you know what. Sexually conscious at five years old? Jake is just an incredibly mature boy, isn't he? Jeesh!
Babytile is the single biggest mistake that Ted has ever made in his gossip rag career. It was fed to him to pollute Toothy tile and he can''t back away from it. Some pr flack is laughing her/his ass off.
Any more info?
Jake, don't forget to buy shelled peanuts, Hyde Park squirrels are always hungry!
Who doesn't love a parkour trained squirrel? Wonder if Jake gave him lessons while he was filming in England? Maybe they jiggled some nuts around while Jake was filming. ;-)
Parkour trained squirrel - LOL :)
It was fed to him to pollute Toothy tile and he can''t back away from it.
And, since a certain blogger asked for visual evidence regarding Jake's Prius, do you have a video of Ted being "polluted" by a sinister undercover agent, trying to undermine his TT Blind Item? After all, why would Jake even care, if what Ted was saying wasn't even true? Oh, that's right. A-list seeking Jake probably cares very much. More than a so-called innocent man really should.
Babytile is the single biggest mistake that Ted has ever made in his gossip rag career. It was fed to him to pollute Toothy tile and he can''t back away from it. Some pr flack is laughing her/his ass off.
Hey, I'm not a Baby Tile believer, but if Jake's people went so far as to fake feed a baby story to "pollute" Toothy, they're pretty pathetic. imo, that further confirms Jake as Toothy b/c they would ignore it otherwise. Doesn't sound like smart PR to me.
The original post indicated van, probably meant SUV.
Oh, please. If you're not the orginal poster, how do you know what they "meant." Here's the exact words from the original post: "a large dark tinted windowed van in his family-sized van" (and they bolded it). And, yeah, it makes a huge difference, they're exaggerating in order to try and make their case. The entire argument about vehicles makes no sense. This is an extremely wealthy person we're talking about. He doesn't need to trade in a small car in order to get a bigger one. He probably has lots of cars, his assistants use different cars, his bodyguards use different cars. There's no need for him to drive this supposed big "family" vehicle when the supposed family isn't with him. He's simply driving whatever kind of vehicle he wants to and it has nothing to do with whether he has a kid or not.
Oh, please. If you're not the orginal poster, how do you know what they "meant."
Because I'm clueless, probably like a lot of folks, when it comes to sizes of vehicles. I know when I read SUV I think of family accomodating transport. In fact, several of my friends have bought SUVs over the the past 5 years because they have started a family. One person, bought one to see over traffic another because they thought it was safer. Somehow, I don't think the latter two were Jake's motivations for upsizing.
Some people buy SUV's for status. But alot of new families have to go to an SUV or a van due to the size of those baby carseats. Two door vehicles are out of the question and even a midsize vehicle isn't the best, especially if you have two. Which Ted has hinted that there may be two BT's now. Not only do you have carseats but you have diaper bags or tote bags, strollers, snacks, drinks, etc.
It's interesting to see the change in tone of the BT discussion between earlier today and tonight.
when someone continues to belabor a point based on one single word by ignoring the validity of the rest of the argument, that particular someone is trying to distract and confuse.
Nah. Some people just focus on one tiny thing and argue it ad nauseum while disregarding all else. LOL their fault of being tunnel-visioned, argumentative and tiresomely repetitive doesn't mean there's a conspiracy or PR plan in place.
if Jake gave him lessons while he was filming in England?
Whut? Hell no. He had me teach him how to stuff his cheeks full of nuts.
new families have to go to an SUV or a van due to the size of those baby carseats.
LOL that reminds me about when my bil had to pick up his parents at the airport. The "family" SUV wouldn't start so he had to take his weekend "couple" fun car, the Porsche Carrera. The baby was comfy in his carseat in the passenger seat and the parents with all their luggage were stuffed in the back for a 2 hour ride.
Kirsten doesn't fit the clues.
Kirsten fits every clue. Drop dead gorgeous, film, check, boyfriend likes boys, Toothy, check, recent meeting in Montreal, check. Rehab, check check check, career down the dumper, check.
That said, I don't believe for a minute Kirsten laid herself naked on a bed for Jake. How the hell would Gossip Boy know that unless Jake had gone to someone and blabbed? Why would he do that to a girl he gets on okay with despite all the PR fakery? Gosip Boy makes shit fit.
There's more chance Kirsten was there with her girlfriend.
Even Gossip Boy is trying to make Jake happen sexually to promote PoP.
This abolutely didn't happen imo. All Gossip Boy's BI's are more 'tape recorder under the bed' than Ted's. How could he possibly know these things happened?
Forget Prius or SUV. More telling is that he requested a house with a long driveway and a garage that enters to the house when he was staying in London. It was not needed to hide Reese and her brood. It was needed to hide his own family
kittymd: Jake Gyllenhaal sat next to us in bar last night, like you do.
2:17:That request was BS, just a UK real estate firm looking for attention.
2:17:That request was BS, just a UK real estate firm looking for attention.
You forgot to add that it can't possibly be true because it didn't come from Ted C.
7:26 AM,
Jake was in London for months and there were
1. Reeke arranged paparazzi photo ops (x)
2. movie set photos (1)
3. Jake visiting paparazzi magnet restaurant photos (1 or 2)
4. one Jake eating breakfast sighting.
Jake was very, very low profile and private.
8:46 AM, you are a sore loser, lol!
Jackie, please delete trolly post 8:46
2:17: That request was BS, just a UK real estate firm looking for attention.
What was the name of the UK Real estate firm?
Can Hollywood Legally Keep Gay Stars in the Closet?
Sat., May. 1, 2010 7:00 AM PDT by Leslie Gornstein
"Is it legal for a movie studio to have a clause in a celeb's contract that prohibits them from being openly gay? Wouldn't that be considered discriminatory?
—Ande, Los Angeles via Facebook
Interesting topic, given that some closeted celeb is due to come out next week. (And will E! Online have all the details? You bet we will!)
About your question, let's put it this way...
If any company tried to tell any full-time employee—say, for the sake of argument, that Disney hired Adam Lambert, and ordered him not to talk about his gayness—that sort of contract would go south quick.
First of all, the studio would be dealing with Adam Lambert. And second, attorneys tell me such a contractual demand would probably be illegal. But what about contracts that don't involve an employee relationship—like, say, an agency and an actor?
The answer my shock you:
I talked to an array of people for this story, ranging from well-sourced gossip columnists to top-flight attorneys. And none of them flat-out denied that such contracts exist.
In fact, at least one source tells me they do exist, but not necessarily in the explicit way you might think they do. From what I am able to gather, a contract between an agency and an actor may dodge the exact issue of "coming out." But it might ban other sorts of telltale activities.
Angela Agrusa, an attorney at the entertainment law firm Liner Grode Stein, says she hasn't personally seen any such contracts, "but I'm sure they do exist." Nonetheless, she wouldn't be surprised if contracts were more vague—couched "more in behavior modification terms—you won't be seen in public holding hands with so-and-so, that sort of thing."
Why? Well, Agrusa explains, asking a star to outright deny or decline to discuss sexual identity might be considered voidable by a judge—even if the relationship isn't that of an employer and employee.
Which brings us back to our soon-to-be-out mystery gay.
Sure would be interesting to know exactly what type of pressure—contractual or otherwise—has kept them in closet, don't you think?"
Can Hollywood Legally Keep Gay Stars in the Closet?
mattypop39: Me and "Mr Brokeback Moutain himself" Jake Gyllenhaal... EXCITE!!!!! http://twitpic.com/1kaxmg
jsr56: Just sat next to Jake Gyllenhaal at brunch in Chelsea. He totally caught me Gawking at him.
May 5th will be Chely Wright, country singer. ONTD comments. The original source, TMZ.
This is a total surprise, we didn't know about her being a lesbian ;)
The "family" SUV wouldn't start so he had to take his weekend "couple" fun car, the Porsche Carrera. The baby was comfy in his carseat in the passenger seat and the parents with all their luggage were stuffed in the back for a 2 hour ride.
:) Awwww the baby rode in style.
Wow, is it Chely Wright? Someone mentioned her here awhile back, a tweet or something, and I wondered where she had been
In fact, at least one source tells me they do exist, but not necessarily in the explicit way you might think they do.
Duh!
Angela Agrusa, an attorney at the entertainment law firm Liner Grode Stein, says she hasn't personally seen any such contracts.
Wow, is it Chely Wright? Someone mentioned her here awhile back, a tweet or something, and I wondered where she had been
Oh, I must've missed that tweet. Well, congrats to her and all that, it's a good thing when anyone comes out. But they over-hyped this (what else is new) and that inevitably leads to a let-down. I vaguely remember her from years ago, but whoever made the comment that it was going to be someone who needed a "coming out tour" to pump up their career was right. She hasn't had a hit song in over ten years. I'm kind of surprised she's getting a People cover, but good for her. It will be interesting to see how her new CD sells on the country music charts.
VirgoJohnny: @Atheria I'm psychic AND this : http://www.gambling911.com/Vin-Diesel-Jake-Gylenhaal-Oprah-Winfrey-gay-062506.html
about 10 hours ago
Hey 9:53, why aren't you repeating the ENTIRE quote? Angela Agrusa, an attorney at the entertainment law firm Liner Grode Stein, says she hasn't personally seen any such contracts, "but I'm sure they do exist."
Jake is not gay, you can't make him gay by keeping saying it. Ted has never said Jake was Toothy, its you and people like you wishing he were. Tell a lie long enough it spreads, this blog is a lie. You are ruining Jake's career not because you are calling him gay but basically you are calling him a liar. Jake can't come out because he is a straight man. He has said so in interviews that some of you have just turned a blind eye. This blog owner should be sued for calling Jake a liar.
Hi UV/FL. Babble must be really boring, huh.
10:10 AM
Forget Ted and Toothy Tile. Jake bearded for years, Jake is gay as a goose.
Jake is so boring nowadays that Gyllenbabble isn't discussing the Reeke wedding ad nauseum anymore. Maybe they should change over to a Reese blog; at least she buys more PR coverage. They could change the blog name to "Witheredpoo - Let's talk about Toth!"
You make no sense 10,20.
Jake is so boring nowadays that Gyllenbabble is coming here.
Because someone else repeated that part of the quote, leaving out the first half. She's never seen one, and she's an entertainment lawyer.
If someone comes out, it's always a good thing, regardless of what's happening with their careers. The tweet was that someone saw Chely in a restaurant, or something. It's in one of WFT2's fairly recent threads, I think.
Wouldn't it stand to reason that if the AB had a law firm with experience in these types of contracts, she would quote them, not someone who's never seen them but thinks they exist?
I can't believe how naive people are that they honestly think the only gay people in Hollywood are the very few that have actually made a public announcement. These types of contracts and arrangements have been going on for decades. Anyone who can't/won't see that is living in the fantasy world created, bought and paid for by the PR controlled media. Chely Wright used to be "paired up" with Brad Paisley in the PR rags. Gosh, I wonder why that never worked out.
Wouldn't it stand to reason that if the AB had a law firm with experience in these types of contracts, she would quote them, not someone who's never seen them but thinks they exist?
Um, I'm a lawyer, and I can tell you that the answer to that is a big, fat NO. No way would a lawyer who has actually created one of those contracts allow themselves to be quoted by name. There is a little thing called attorney-client privilege and if you break it, you lose your law license. Even if the attorney didn't name a client, their law firm would then be exposed to all kinds of speculation about their client list - way too risky. They'd have to be an absolute idiot to do that.
Yes, we know all of that. You're not breaking attorney client privilege to say yes they do actually exist - admitting you've never seen one but you are sure they exist say nothing. Why not just say you are sure they exist and leave it at that? Nobody would betray a confidence by admitting they exist. Or they could ask not to be identified. Happens all the time. E is just covering their butt with both sides of the coin. But it makes for nice speculation.
Sorry for the mixed metaphor. :)
Using that line of reasoning, an attorney acting in their client's best interests would not speak to a gossip columnist at all, I don't think. I'm not sure about the agent - client reasoning either.
10:57, you don't understand how lawyers think. Please re-read my post - I explained that they wouldn't technically be breaking attorney-client privilege but they would be exposing their law firm to questions about their clients. There is no reason for them to do that. None. They would have nothing to gain and the clients they do have would run like hell away from a law firm with such loose-lipped attorneys, even if they're only speaking in generalities.
Or they could ask not to be identified.
Didn't you read the entire article? That's obviously exactly what happened: "In fact, at least one source tells me they do exist, but not necessarily in the explicit way you might think they do." That source is the person who asked not to be identified.
That says nothing. I mean someone definitely saying they do exist, with no qualifications attached. What that says above is that it is open to interpretation. Just flat out say they exist. This just adds more layers of if-sh*t. Nothing definite.
She's already exposing her law firm by mentioning their name. People could still speculate about her clients. Firms have reputations that they hold very highly. I do know how attorneys think.
You're right, I only know how damn few attorneys think, and I don't want to know. They're the scum of the earth, IMO, unless they work for human rights or legal aid. There's a special level of hell reserved for them, right alongside of corporate tycoons. :)
11: 24 and 11:20, I can't follow your reasoning so I'm not going to continue with this. It's just silly. If you're looking for some attorney or employee of a law firm to come right out, by name, and give specific information about these types of contracts and admit that their law firm does them - that's just not going to happen. Look, you're free to believe that these contracts don't exist if you like just as you're free to believe there are no gay celebs other than those few that are out.
Exactly, and for all intents and purposes, maybe they do exist. But don't grab onto some flimsly piece of information and wave it around like the absolute truth. So you can't follow someone's line of reasoning, so it must be faulty, right? Maybe you are the one with the problem. And now, I'm done.
But don't grab onto some flimsly piece of information and wave it around like the absolute truth.
No one is being forced to read anything and nothing is being "waved around" like absolute truth. Links are made all the time to articles. Everything here is just put out there for people to read or believe or not believe, whatever. The question posed at 10:32 is illogical, but there's no reason for you to be so pissed off and defensive when that's pointed out.
10:32's quote is not illogical - but I can see why some would take offense to it, because it's true. If someone had something irrefutable, you'd know it.
The other interesting thing is why would Adam Lambert be immune to such a pervasive system? You'd think he'd be subject to the same unfairness, wouldn't you? Or are they trying to say that he's the only one who would stand up and speak out against the system? Marketing is a wonderful thing.
GiseIe: @adamlambert Are you excited to meet Jake Gyllenhaal next week on @Wossy!? Lucky bitch <3!
8 minutes ago
I hope Adam will answer this question :)
So here's a cute little discussion about whether Hollywood studios can legally keep actors and actresses in the closet. And the very easy answer is: Yes, yes they can.
It's called a "morals clause," and most stars of television series and even some movies have them. Often, for heterosexual actors, this just means "No getting arrested for beating your wife," although you've got to wonder what Charlie Sheen's morals clause looks like then. For gay actors, however, maintaining a certain public image can be spelled out in legalese before, say, Matt Bomer signs on to star on USA's White Collar.
Leslie Gornstein writes at E!: "I talked to an array of people for this story, ranging from well-sourced gossip columnists to top-flight attorneys. And none of them flat-out denied that such contracts exist. In fact, at least one source tells me they do exist, but not necessarily in the explicit way you might think they do. From what I am able to gather, a contract between an agency and an actor may dodge the exact issue of 'coming out.' But it might ban other sorts of telltale activities."
While employers may not be able to wield such control over full-time employees, movie studios are considered independent contractors, and they could argue that portraying a hetero image is crucial to a successful business transaction. Studios can exclude white actors if the role calls for a black actor, and while public acknowledgment of one's sexuality takes place off screen, we'd love to see studio make the case that public perception is as equally important as what happens in front of the camera.
Queerty
I'm an attorney too, and it's nonsense to say an attorney couldn't talk about the existence of a type of contract without violating the attorney-client privilege. It would be like saying an attorney can't admit there's such a thing as a prenup or a confidentiality agreement. It gives nothing away about your clients to talk about legal ideas and what one can and cannot do legally.
I'm frightened for the justice system if there are that many attorneys posting on WFT2. And by "that many" I mean more than -0-
I'm an attorney too, and it's nonsense to say an attorney couldn't talk about the existence of a type of contract without violating the attorney-client privilege
Please read the posts. That is NOT what was said - and it was explained it more than once.
Yes that is what was said.
From WDW :
"Before I get going tonight, I have to thank Disney for the wonderful pressie in the post last night of tickets for the advance screening of Prince of Persia in Leicester Square next Friday!"
I knew it. Final confirmation at last. So much for being an honest, unbiased fan-blog. The next time I mention WDW's Disney/CAA/pro-heterosexual bias, I don't want to hear any complaints, OK?
I think that it's time to officially add WDW to the Gyllenbabble, DC and IHJ virtual CAA-speed-dial list. When CAA/Disney ask these web sites to jump, the moderators ask, 'how high?'.
What's next? The next time Jake decides to tell us that every woman should find a man and every man should find a woman, and the above mentioned websites say nothing, will Disney send them four free passes and hotel reservations?
Rock Hudson and Montgomery Clift are probably turning over in their graves. After 50 years, virtually nothing has changed for A-list male actors. Nothing.
Well, Kate works hard to promote Jake and PoP so she deserves the prize.
Jake's PR should send Kate a gift for supporting Reeke and promoting straight Jake.
I think it's more about her WDW facebook which really is a Pop facebook. She has made herself known, pimping her blog and facebook on twitter. She also tweeted the Disney Pop official facebook, the JBruckheimer twitter along with D. Jones.
She also has a film blog where she reviews movies and she is freinds with the guys who run heyyouguys blog that covered Jake at wondercon, so it didn't just happened , she worked for it.
When she first started her blog she wanted to do a Biography of Jake and made contacts with someone in Jake'a camp via Jake Watch Prophecy girl. I don't know what happened to that bio project but i think she lost contact with that person when they realized that Kate involvement in Jake's online fandom went beyond WDW.
If she has 4 tickets then I bet the other 3 will go to Ruby and a few other DC/WDW posters from the UK.
When she first started her blog she wanted to do a Biography of Jake
Bad idea.
"Jake's PR should send Kate a gift for supporting Reeke and promoting straight Jake."
IA. She's promoting het-Jake because that what CAA/Disney wants. If she didn't, all of those perks would dry up. She could blog and promote PoP as much as she wants to. If CAA/Disney thought that she was going to promote Jake as the closeted gay male star of Pop, she wouldn't receive any more press-passes, t-shirts or advance notices.
Maybe we should add a CAA-approved button to IHJ, CAA, Gyllenbabble and WDW. At least you'll know what you're in for when you read the posts.
In terms of perpetuating the closet in Hollywood, which one is worse?
1) sleazy pr people in the Hollywood hierarchy who threaten to destroy the career of A-list male actors if they come out of the closet
2) explicitly homophobic movie-goers who will not see an action film with a male a-list out gay star
3) supposedly progressive, utterly sycophantic fan-blogs that do nothing when their favorite stars trash homosexuality to get ahead.
1) sleazy pr people in the Hollywood hierarchy who threaten to destroy the career of A-list male actors if they come out of the closet
PR people are just tools. Movie studios and producers have the power, and they want to make profit.
2) explicitly homophobic movie-goers who will not see an action film with a male a-list out gay star
Things will change for the better, but it will take time.
3) supposedly progressive, utterly sycophantic fan-blogs that do nothing when their favorite stars trash homosexuality to get ahead.
Don't expect fangirls to question their idols.
Dizneydreamer: Is it bad that i want to buy the prince of persia legos for ds so i can look at jake gyllenhall on the box?
about 1 hour ago
TeachJoanne: Dear non-denomination god-like being that I hope is female: Can I please have Jake Gyllenhaal as a pet? I'll be good for a whole day. xx
3 minutes ago
Even if PoP won't receive the best reviews, it should be a decent b.o. hit and he'll definitely gain more female/gay male fans. He's looking especially delicious in PoP.
Yes that is what was said.
May 02, 2010 2:07 PM
Well, either you have extremely poor reading comprehension or you completely missed these parts of the posts at 10:50 and 11:11:
"Even if the attorney didn't name a client, their law firm would then be exposed to all kinds of speculation about their client list - way too risky. They'd have to be an absolute idiot to do that."
Please re-read my post - I explained that they wouldn't technically be breaking attorney-client privilege but they would be exposing their law firm to questions about their clients. There is no reason for them to do that. None. They would have nothing to gain and the clients they do have would run like hell away from a law firm with such loose-lipped attorneys, even if they're only speaking in generalities."
paolo_adagio: @adamlambert would you date ricky martin?
3 minutes ago
Well, either you have extremely poor reading comprehension or you completely missed these parts of the posts at 10:50 and 11:11:
"Even if the attorney didn't name a client, their law firm would then be exposed to all kinds of speculation about their client list - way too risky. They'd have to be an absolute idiot to do that."
Not true. Prestigious law firms, e.g., an entertainment law firm, has hundreds if not more like thousands of clients. They may just represent someone once, or do work for them all the times. And it's not like with agents, law firms are not in the habit of listing who their clients are. Nobody would get pissed about them answering a very generic question--have you ever seen this kind of contract. Not to mention you'd have no idea which side of the desk, so to speak, they were working on when they saw it--the actor, or the agency.
I don't know much about law, but I know that I would not talk about anti-gay contracts - that can't be good for business.
Angela Agrusa, an attorney at the entertainment law firm Liner Grode Stein, says she hasn't personally seen any such contracts, "but I'm sure they do exist."
EVERYONE knows that such contracts exist.
"She could blog and promote PoP as much as she wants to. If CAA/Disney thought that she was going to promote Jake as the closeted gay male star of Pop, she wouldn't receive any more press-passes, t-shirts or advance notices."
Kate never saw jake as "the closetd gay male star of POP"
Sorry but I don't understand why you make big deal about what she thinks.
Wonder who Jake took with him to London? If he's going out to brunches and whatever he's not going alone. Pre Reeke he used to take Chris with him alot. During Reeke he didn't have any movies to promote. He just had to follow the Chin around and promote himself as the good, spineless boyfriend. During Source Code shoot he seemed to go out alot and was always with the female PA and the male baby sitter. Wonder if Jake took along the unidentified male compaignon he took to Mozza and to brunch the next morning?
Most likely his BG and Carie his Rep.
Kate never saw jake as "the closetd gay male star of POP"
Kate knows Jake is gay.
^^Really? She seems to ship him with Aniston.
During Source Code shoot he seemed to go out alot and was always with the female PA and the male baby sitter.
Who is the male baby sitter? Are there pics of him with vomit on his shoulder?
I have known Kate from the DC days and neither she nor anyone in his fandom knows anything. Please stop defending her actions, she knows just about as much as UV, FL, SK, Jackie or Steph from IHJ knows.
She used to post on WTF all the time but it was about Jake and Chris, wishful thinking on her part.
The thing with Kate is she has RL Jake and slash Jake, RL Jake is Jake fucking her or Annie or Natalie her preference, and in her slash world it's Chris.
She pushed Reeke because that's what she thought CAA wanted, she always thought that Reese wan't right for Jake, she prefers Natalie, Annie or even Kiki.
Kate straddles the fence so she doesn't loose fans on both sides.
So no, Kate doesn't know if Jake is gay or not.
Kate isn't at all what she seems.
Really? She seems to ship him with Aniston.
Yes, really, because she hinted so in her old posts and because a die hard fan would have to be blind and stupid not to see that Reeke was 100% fake.
Yes Kate likes him with Aniston too. She has no inside knowledge of Jake despite her attempts.
She wants to fuck Jake so her believeing he's gay wouldn't work
So no, Kate doesn't know if Jake is gay or not.
Kate believed that Jake is gay and after Reeke I'm sure she's as convinced as we are.
She wants to fuck Jake so her believeing he's gay wouldn't work
LOL! Kate isn't stupid, she isn't a stupid fangirl, read her old DC posts.
She wants to fuck Jake so her believeing he's gay wouldn't work
Jake turns me on sometimes too and I think he's gay. Same goes for NPH and i know he's gay. So...
Wonder if Jake took along the unidentified male compaignon he took to Mozza and to brunch the next morning?
London is business, I'm sure Jake wouldn't do anything to piss off Disney.
You think all straight women will suddenly stop fantasizing about Ricky Martin just because he's gay? Some will, but most, imo, won't. Thing is, we will NEVER be with these hot celebs, not matter if they are straight, bi, gay.
Does Kate still post on DC?
She like to ship Jake with Annie, Natalie and Kiki and Aniston or herself.
It's mostly Annie and Aniston. Aniston is like 45 or something, even if Jake was straight, he wouldn't hook up with her. Rather someone younger to procreate with.
Angela Agrusa, an attorney at the entertainment law firm Liner Grode Stein, says she hasn't personally seen any such contracts, "but I'm sure they do exist."
This statement alone is substantial and significant on its own, whether Ms. Agrusa admits she's seen one of these contracts or not. Here's why. An attorney at Liner Grode Stein (one of the largest, most prestigious law firms in Los Angeles), went on the record and stated unequivocably that she knows that talent agencies draw up contracts that are designed to keep performers in the closet. LYS&R is one of the most well respected firms in LA. Like all businesses of this ilk, their success is largely based on their reputation. Ms. Agrusa's straight forward, no qualification statement is a remarkable one. Truly huge, everyone. Don't get lost in minutia folks. We now have a high powered business and entertainment industry attorney admitting these stay-in-the- closet contracts exist. Wow!
Probably means you need to get out more.
We now have a high powered business and entertainment industry attorney admitting these stay-in-the- closet contracts exist.
Too bad that actors can't / don't complain.
That was not unequivocal, at all.
It's not an unequivocal statement because she's saying she's never seen one personally (one of the largest and most prestigous law firms in Los Angeles) but yet she's sure they exist. You wonder what makes her so sure - it needs to be clearer.
"but I'm sure they do exist."
Don't know what language is your native tongue, but when someone in English, with her insider status and knowledge of entertainment contract law states, "I'm sure" that means certain...no doubt in her mind at all.
But she prefaced it with she's never seen one. It makes for doubt. Further, no attorney would talke to a gossip columnist. You wonder why noone else has done an expose on it.
Her areas of expertise isn't entertainment law, unless I have the wrong person. A contract can be written for anything, but whether it's valid or not is another story. Morals clauses may have been used in the 50s, but not today. If they are cloaking it in different wording, there's no way to say.
no attorney would talke to a gossip columnist.
Well, we know that's not true, don't we? Not only did she give her name but she indicated the law firm she worked at. Facts easily verifiable. And, Ms. Agrusa never mentioned that the contract was based on a morals clause. She, in fact, talked about behavioral stipulations. A world of difference between the two. Since you are now making stuff up, like morals clause, I have nothing further to discuss. Rational people will make up their own minds.
No, I'm speaking about the article in E!, in general. Her contribution was only part of it. They went on to say that they don't exist in traditional form, but are worded in different ways. The article was meant to be taken as a whole, I think.
Yes, of course rational people make up their own minds. I can state an opinion like anyone else. I choose to take it with a hefty grain of salt. YEs, she's an attorney, and she isn't involved in entertainment law agreements. So she gave her opinion. There's no way to know if it's a fact or not, or to go further to assume which stars are being kept in the closet because of big bad contracts. They still don't have to go along with it.
Nobody said Ms. Argusa used the term. It's not the same today as it was in the 50s was the point. What is the difference between a morals clause and behavioural stipulations? Talk about making stuff up to suit your own purpose. You are invalidating your own argument, if you think behavioral stipulations don't mean amount to the same thing.
Mestup2000miles: Just entered 20+ competitions to try and win premiere tickets for Prince of Persia... dear God the things I do for Jake Gyllenhaal ):
7 minutes ago
Morals clauses may have been used in the 50s, but not today.
Employers like lawyers focus are behaviors in contracts as opposed to the concept of immorality, which is highly subjective. Don't believe for a moment such clauses don't exist in all walks of life and are usually behaviorally associated with causing adverse economic impact to the product's image or viability. From talent agencies, to sport celebrities (How do you think so many sponsors would able to walk away from their contracts with Tiger Woods?), to book publishers, to fund raisers. Example cited below:
Random House asks young adult writers to contractually promise not to behave immorally
CORY DOCTOROW, AUGUST 21, 2008
Random House is asking some of its authors of young adult books to sign contracts with "morality clauses" that allow the publisher to take back your advance and cancel your book if you're caught doing anything that "damages your reputation as a person suitable to work with or be associated with children, and consequently the market for or value of the work is seriously diminished." For the record, Random House Audio published my young adult novel Little Brother and did not request this clause.
An email arrives from the Society of Author's Children's Writers And Illustrators Group. Apparently, a well-established, enormous publishing house has decided to insert the following clause into its standard contract for children's books: "If you act or behave in a way which damages your reputation as a person suitable to work with or be associated with children, and consequently the market for or value of the work is seriously diminished, and we may (at our option) take any of the following actions: Delay publication / Renegotiate advance / Terminate the agreement."
Yes, we know there are morals clauses in contracts. I have worked endorsement contracts. That's not the same thing as writing in language about someone's sexuality, you can't be seen with your partner, holding hands, etc. Tiger Woods' behavior is different, IMO. So is criminal behavior and drug use. All legitimate reasons to terminate a contract. Homosexuality is not one of them, hasn't been since the 50s. Now if they coach it in different language, who's to say. But "behavioral stipulations" is just a euphemism for a morals clause, is what I meant, for all practical purposes. You or I don't believe it, but there is a segment of the population who probably does, or they wouldn't use stipulations on behavior. What about actor's unions?
^^for professional athletes. And just because their lawyers write a clause in, doesn't mean your attorney can't strike it out. If they want you bad enough, they'll concede to your demands.
"So no, Kate doesn't know if Jake is gay or not."
yes she doesn't know! anayway her blog doesn't focuse on his sexuality but more on him as actor. She thinks what she wants about his private life, her blog is mainly apreciated cause she has good infos about movie and project.
yes she doesn't know!
Kate knows because she is a die hard fan, not because she has some inside knowledge.
her blog doesn't focuse on his sexuality
True, but Kate was the major Reeke supporter and is major JiS supporter.
Not sure if this was already posted:
3/11/10
Jake Gyllenhaal Would 'Never Pass Up A Superhero'
Actor Jake Gyllenhaal will play an action hero in the upcoming "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time," but comic book movie fans might remember a time when he was considered for a far more familiar protagonist: Spider-Man. After missing out on replacing Tobey Maguire in "Spider-Man 2," his upcoming role has us wondering whether playing a superhero was still on his to-do list now that he's in the heroic mindset.
So, when we caught up with him on the Oscars red carpet, we asked him just that question...
(video)
"I'd never pass up a superhero, man," he smiled.
And now that we know he can bulk up for a muscular hero in "Prince of Persia" as easily as he can play a quiet outsider in "Donnie Darko," the question becomes: which superhero would you like to see him play?
MTV
nohopefortoday_: i cried like a bitch after Brokeback Mountain last night. Heath Ledger and Jake Gyllenhaal in the same movie = BEST MOVIE OF ALL TIME.
3 minutes ago
Dr. Arnold Klein, Michael Jackson's doctor, receives death threats after claiming singer was gay
Michael Jackson's long-time friend and physician says he is getting death threats after outing the King of Pop.
Dr. Arnold Klein told TMZ that he has received "horrible death threats" since he told the gossip Web site Friday that Jackson was gay. Last week on "Extra," Jackson's office manager, Jason Pfeiffer, claimed to have had an affair with his former boss. After the interview, Klein called in to TMZ to support Pfeiffer, adding that the office manager was "the love of [Jackson's] life."
Klein told TMZ that he revealed the singer's secret to put an end to rumors that Jackson was a pedophile. He did, however, add that Jackson’s alleged two-month fling with Pfeiffer was the only homosexual relationship he believes the singer has had.
Klein and Pfeiffer, who has also reportedly had his life threatened, have hired bodyguards since the incident.
link
There's no way to know if it's a fact or not, or to go further to assume which stars are being kept in the closet because of big bad contracts. They still don't have to go along with it.
Actors are in the closet because they want to have good careers, the same chance for success as everyone else. I'm sure movie studios and producers are using contracts to keep gay stars in the closed during filming and movie promotion - no one in the right mind would invest 100 million without formal insurance.
the office manager was "the love of [Jackson's] life
Jackson’s alleged two-month fling
I hate when people / reports don't make sense.
mylifeinlondon: Total celebrity spotting weekend Hugh Grant & Jake Gyllenhaal
3 minutes ago
Another controversy involving a high school prom and the LGBT community. Thankfully, this one was resolved quickly and has a happy ending.
Cape May County, New Jersey 18-year old Derrek Lutz, who describes himself as a "cross dresser," wanted to wear a dress and high heels to his prom this weekend but was met resistance from his high school. CBS 11 reports: "So Lutz planned to show up with his female date, not to protest, but to participate in the festivities however he could.
In the meantime, his friends started a petition and collected more than 600 signatures. Hundreds more joined a Facebook page created and titled: "Let Derrek Lutz Wear A Dress To Prom."
In response, the school's principal told Eyewitness News: "There was a discussion between the principal and a student. That discussion was taken to other parties in the district and the issue was resolved."
Lutz says he heard the district's legal advisor got involved, and whatever the reason, the high school senior is relieved he prevailed. "People shouldn't have to deal with this in the future and I'm really glad that Cape May County has moved on," Lutz said.
You can watch the full report from CBS 11 here.
Towleroad
Overseas, Iron Man 2 managed to dominate the box office with $100.2 million in ticket sales. Success varied wildly, with it hitting only 51% of what the first film did in the UK, but 179% of what the first film opened to in South Korea. Still, being #1 in 52 out of 53 markets it opened in is nothing to sneeze at.
Over at E!, The Answer Bitch talks about how “legal” it is for contracts to restrict an actor coming out, or doing anything “gay” in public. No one would go on the record as having seen such a contract, but everyone said such contracts existed. Unless I’m horribly mistaken, the article seems to have gotten noticeably shorter since the first time I read it.
Regardless of whether Jake had something explicit in his POP contract, I think Reeke was done partly to show he wasn't going to come out, despite all the chatter that Toothy was going to do it. I think the reason why he seemed to change on a dime was due to POP. NOw he's doing everything he can to prove he's straight, including that horrendous quote in GQ, because, you know, in Jake's world the possibility that someone is gay just doesn't exist. He's too straight!
I really hope POP fails, because otherwise he and Disney will be "rewarded" for their homophobia.
Country singer Chely Wright's reasoning was sound. "There had never, ever been a country music artist who had acknowledged his or her homosexuality," she tells PEOPLE. "I wasn't going to be the first."
But now Wright is changing her tune. "Nothing in my life has been more magical than the moment I decided to come out," she says.
Wright, 39, recalls of her youth in the South: "I don't have a memory in my life that doesn't include the dream of making music." But during her childhood and rapid ascent to fame in the county world, she also experienced a community in which homosexuality was shunned. "I hid everything for my music," says Wright.
The singer-songwriter, who has won both an Academy of Country Music and a Country Music award, will later this week release her memoir, Like Me, as well as her first album in five years, Lifted off the Ground.
She'll also appear on the Today Show Wednesday to discuss her personal journey. For more on Chely Wright's and her decision to come out, pick up PEOPLE, on newsstands Friday
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20365936,00.html
Coming out mystery solved :)
I really hope POP fails, because otherwise he and Disney will be "rewarded" for their homophobia.
Bad box office wouldn't help anything.
Dear Ted:
I have 5 rescue cats. I'm a sucker for those little balls of fur that need me. Anyway, I recently watched The Day After Tomorrow for the first time in many years. I knew Jake G was in the movie and Dennis Quaid. But didn't realize Austin Nichols and Emmy Rossum were supporting players. I thought Phantom was Emmy's debut. Which makes me wonder, did Jake, Austin and Emmy become friends during filming? Have they (or any combination of them) stayed friends?
—D
Dear Bromance:
Haven't you heard—Jakey and Sophia Bush's beau Austin are totally BFF.
Dear Ted:
As a gay man, I have always had a soft spot in my heart for Sandy Bullock...and Cher. I was so happy that she made lemons out of lemonade. Is it as sincere as it came across to a normal guy like me?
—X
Dear Joe Shmoe:
I totally love her too—one of my H'wood faves, so trust that your love for S.B. is not undeserved, not at all.
Bitch-Back! Selena's Gleeming New Beau?
Bonus Blind Vice: Which Young Star's X-tra Naughty?
You know what a lot of celebs do when they're trapped in the closet? Drugs. And lots of 'em.
A young Toothy Tile had to do line after line just to get through sex with a chick (you know, in an attempt to prove to himself he was straight) and now we're hearing another young homolicious babe is going through similar motions.
Anyone remember cutie Jackie Bouffant?
Jackie, the über-yum young-ish star who has a red-hot career (and bod, just FYI), seems to be dabbling in the hard stuff. But it's not coke.
While out on the town recently Jackie the stud was rolling—and we don't mean in some pimped-out caddy. He was superhigh on ecstasy.
J.B. was hitting a celeb-infested soiree filled with cameras, paparazzi and reporters, so natch that meant his beard was in tow for the photo ops.
And how did Bouffant get through the evening? By popping a few of those teeny colored pills in his mouth so his adorable smile wouldn't fade throughout the event.
Totally sad. Or not?
Thing is, Jackie really does enjoy his gal-pal (they've known each other for a while), but he hardly wants to rip off her stylish clothes off. And yes, Jackie's PR candy is most certainly aware of both of her man's habits—the drugs and dudes. But Missus Bouffant doesn't mind all that much. Jackie certainly is the bigger name out of the pretty pair, so she won't be letting her golden ticket to the tabloids go anywhere.
Ironic, though, how Jack's audience might be more shocked about the whole ecstasy thing than gay thing, which may not stay hidden for too much longer since J.B.'s pals can't stop blabbing about his way fun rolling ways around town.
Wonder which secret will come out—pun intended—first?
And it ain't: Jensen Ackles, Justin Bieber, Justin Timberlake
Bonus Blind Vice: Which Young Star's X-tra Naughty?
ITA with POP failing if the movie does well it's like validating the bearding and saying that in order to star in that type of movie you can't be just a guy, you have to be Mr. Super Straight, Super Macho guy. That's another reason why Reeke failed so badly. As time went on Reeke made Jake look more and more wussy and pussy whipped and also like the hired nanny. POP failing will hopefully teach Jake & Disney that you can't sell totally BS.
And how did Bouffant get through the evening? By popping a few of those teeny colored pills in his mouth so his adorable smile wouldn't fade throughout the event.
Totally sad. Or not?
Sad.
POP failing will hopefully teach Jake & Disney that you can't sell totally BS.
Teach them what? Teach Disney to use a straight actor next time and Jake to use better beards?
Did anyone think about that maybe Ted got wrong information re. Toothy/Jake and that all is based on a lie? Perhaps Jake didn't lie about being straight. Granted Reeke was horribly off, but maybe they were just a mismatch who used the relationship for image and promotional purposes until Jake got tired of it?
Maybe Jake is accused wrongly for being a liar?
Jake is gay rumors started before Ted, during Donnie Darko days. Ted is not the only person or gossiper who claims that Jake is gay. Reeke was 100% fake.
What if Jake gets married to a woman and they have a kid in the next years? Would you still believe he lied about his sexuality?
Millions of gay men have married women and have children. Zero turned straight.
12:25 PM, do you believe that John Travolta is straight?
We'll see what will happen to Jake. But I think we'll never know for sure about him.
Jake will come out one day.
12:25 PM, do you believe that John Travolta is straight?
No, I don't. Neither do I think Cruise is straight or Clooney etc.
So why would 'Jake gets married to a woman and they have a kid' change anything?
Jake will come out one day.
I'm a fan of Jake no matter his orientation. But it's only Ted who is the primary source for all gay rumors about Jake. Gossip boy and this other guy who said he'll write a book about closeted Hollywood actors take their information from Ted. But I'm not convinced Ted's BV's are reliable.
I guess we'll see what happens.
But it's only Ted who is the primary source for all gay rumors about Jake.
Most popular, but not the only source. Jake's bearding confirmed that Ted was right.
I'm a fan of Jake no matter his orientation.
I'm a fan of Jake becuse I'm curious about him as an actor and a person so that includes his sexual orientation.
In other news, there are reports that an A-list action star plans to publicly come out of the closet sometime this month. Rumors has it that it is "Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time" star Jake Gyllenhaal as the actor who is supposed to be coming out is reported to have a movie due out this month. Who do you guys think it is? What do you think of Chely Wright being so honest with her fans? Let us know now!
http://www.reelempire.com/news/94-music/2326-country-singer-chely-wright-is-gay
"There had never, ever been a country music artist who had acknowledged his or her homosexuality," Chely Wright tells People. "I wasn't going to be the first." Hey, that's great news! Wright is now out, ahead of her May 5 super secret unveiling, with an article up on People.com — spurned, undoubtedly, by Queerty's revealing her identity ahead of publicist Howard Bragman's planned debut. On Wednesday, she's expected to appear on The View and the Today show (we've also heard Larry King Live), bookings that were originally made without producers even knowing who their guest was going to be. Because this was supposed to be a big reveal, with all the talk shows basking in the ratings spike that would come from scoring the first round of interviews with America's new gaylebrity. Except now that Bragman has given People the okay to run with the story two days ahead of time, these shows have suddenly lost their momentum.
They can no longer plug a "big reveal"; the story is already out there.
Access Hollywood is among those playing catch up. Still bound to run its (pre-taped) story on May 5, it's rushing a release that's identifying Wright as the gay celebrity: "In an emotional sit-down interview with ACCESS HOLLYWOOD’S Shaun Robinson, American country music artist Chely Wright speaks candidly about her sexuality, something she has kept private over the span of her career as a singer/songwriter."
You can imagine producers, then, are furious with Bragman. By playing along with the unidentified coming out, Bragman promised all of these shows (and People) they would also benefit, just like his client, by this long-awaited, much-buzzed-about story. Instead, 48 hours from now when Meredith Vieira or whoever sits down with Wright, the story will already be old news. Not for everybody — some people still do not read blogs, Facebook, Twitter, or their sons' private emails — but for many. Instead of absolutely having to tune in to Today to see who's newly out, plenty of folks will be content waiting for the YouTube clip to arrive on Dlisted.
Sure, even we will still tune in for Wright's interviews, because that's our job, and we're curious to see how this barely-a-celebrity breaches the B-list with her newfound fame. But how anti-climactic.
Which is an interesting place to be: Pleased that another person of mild fame is out of the closet, but frustrated that the person who orchestrated it broke promises to keep it a secret to everyone until May 5. But hey, it's the world we live in.
Is Bragman going to lose business from closeted gay celebs? Of course not. But you can expect media outlets will be less willing moving forward to participate in his game.
Queerty
I was a fan of Jake's because he's a good actor whose made some really good films, because I thought he was a decent guy and different from other HW actors, and because he was sex on a stick. All he had to do to look hot was walk down the street.
Now he has turned into another lying, sell your soul and child to get ahead HW phoney, and he's had all the confidence and hotness beaten out of him. He doesn't have that strut and glow he used to have, the sexual ambiguity that drew in men and women, and which made him all the more desirable because everyone wanted him, and he knew it and showed it.
Now he just comes off as a better looking but still average suburban Joe, repressing any hint of sexuality because it would be too gay to have that kind of energy. Gone are the form-fitting t-shirts, the strut, the sparkle in the eyes that says I'm proud of who I am and not going to hide it.
LOL at how Jake's PR made sure he's in the UK waaaaay before May 5th.
In other news, there are reports that an A-list action star plans to publicly come out of the closet sometime this month.
Huh? Where did that come from?
POP failing will hopefully teach Jake & Disney that you can't sell totally BS.
How I wish that were true - not being able to sell total BS, I mean. Unfortunately, you can.
I haven't seen anything in the trailers to make me think PoP's going to be anything but a soulless mess with meh performances and bad accents. Bruckheimer does massive nonsensical movies with every penny going to effects, but here even the CGI looks fuzzy. Yet people are saying Disney's marketing muscle could still push PoP to a $60 mil+ opening weekend. That kind of number - not a huge hit but not a flop - won't teach Jake or Disney a thing.
Sadly, there is no Hollywood career downside to fakery, greed and bull$hit.
Jeeze I wish people would learn to read. LOL I'm not complaining about anyone here now but about the "action star" comment from Howard Bragman. After announcing that a star was coming out on May 5 he said something about that someday an action star could be openly gay and no one will care. How people - journalists! - are taking that to mean that an action star is coming out this week, this month, is really pathetic reading comprehension and irresponsible, careless "reporting".
Sadly, there is no Hollywood career downside to fakery, greed and bull$hit.
You can say that again.Depressing, but true.
I'm waiting for "Prince of Persia the Musical"
I sure do hope that if an actor's attorney saw that kind of that kind of offensive language written into a contract, they'd strike it out right away! :)
"There had never, ever been a country music artist who had acknowledged his or her homosexuality," Chely Wright tells People. "I wasn't going to be the first."
As was pointed out in more than one ONTD comment, wasn't k.d. lange considered a country artist?
Yes she was.
That came from a quote drom Bragman that one day an A-list action star will come out. More lazy, sloppy "journalism".
"There had never, ever been a country music artist with hair who had acknowledged his or her homosexuality," Chely Wright tells People. "I wasn't going to be the first."
re do said...
"There had never, ever been a country music artist with hair who had acknowledged his or her homosexuality," Chely Wright tells People. "I wasn't going to be the first."
LOL! Seriously, though, I do hope when she's on all the talk shows that someone asks her about k.d.
I disagree that POP made Jake take the bearding "straight look" highway. It wasn't POP - it's the roles like Joe Namath and another one (I can't remember the name) coming up in the near future, real-life roles that are traditionally viewed as ultra masculine and very straight. POP as a superhero, it's still a fantasy figure; the actor can be whoever and really whatever sexual orientation. But to get into "real man athlete hero machismo" portrayals the actor in the public eye needs to be straight, until audiences can get over someone being gay and understand what acting really is. IMO POP didn't play into the bearding and hiding as much as the future roles that we really don't know about yet, are doing.
Now he just comes off as a better looking but still average suburban Joe, repressing any hint of sexuality because it would be too gay to have that kind of energy. Gone are the form-fitting t-shirts, the strut, the sparkle in the eyes that says I'm proud of who I am and not going to hide it.
Well said. There used to be something really special about Jake, but no more. I know he's a child of HW, but now he has actually become a product of HW - manufactured, marketed, packaged and sold. I wonder if there is any part of him remaining that is bothered by that.
LOL it's funny that k.d. lang and Jake look alike. I don't have the pic but someone (IIRC on IHJ) had a side by side comparison and it was hilarious. k.d. and Anne Frank could be his sisters.
he has actually become a product of HW - manufactured, marketed, packaged and sold. I wonder if there is any part of him remaining that is bothered by that.
Well......
LOL, I still can't believe Jake did PoP after he did movies like DD, BBM and Zodiac. This guy is cracking me up. Let's hope he won't embarrass himself too much.
Post a Comment