Heath Andrew Ledger
What though the radiance which was once so bright
Be now for ever taken from my sight,
Though nothing can bring back the hour
Of splendour in the grass, of glory in the flower;
We will grieve not, rather find
Strength in what remains behind...
- William Wordsworth
2,726 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 1401 – 1600 of 2726 Newer› Newest»because it's grotesque. ( sorry I am not a believer)
What's grotesque about the possibility of having a baby?
P.S. Keep in mind that Jake's public private life is/was PR charade, smoke and mirrors.
smoke & mirrors = claiming lame ass pics as evidence for a BT
Don't be silly, 5:16 AM. We KNOW about Jake's bearding and all that PR fiction.
Claiming that there is BT = fan speculation. There is no general public, no one is trying to deceive anyone and there is no way to produce fake evidence.
Teen heartthrob Taylor Lautner wants to date someone who can just be themselves
Twilight star Taylor Lautner — who split from singer Taylor Swift — has had enough of dating girls who are preoccupied with themselves and instead is opting for the single life for a while.
“I just want someone who can be themselves. Not put on a show,” said Taylor. “It is as simple as that. I’m not dating anyone right now.”
Following Lautner’s split from Swift, it was claimed the two Taylors decided to call time their short-lived, highly-publicized romance after a series of fights over food. “Unlike Lautner, Swift is anti-diet. Her favorite restaurant is the Cracker Barrel near her family’s Henderson, Tenn., home,” a source said in December.
“Her favorite dish is their biscuits and gravy — something Lautner wouldn’t touch with a 10-foot pole! “Lautner is very athletic and health-conscious, so he eats mostly low-fat protein like skinless chicken breasts, egg whites and vegetables and fruits.
“But Swift loves cheeseburgers and has a major sweet tooth. Picking restaurants for date nights has turned into a huge headache and always leads to a squabble. The only food option they can agree on is sushi.”
ONTD - Taylor Lautner has had ENOUGH of dating girls.
A little OT, but I had to post this. Ryan G. and Michelle W. are the new Baby and Johnny:
a little Dirty Dancing anyone?
Wow! :)
Wow! :)
Lucky Michelle. *jealous*
"What's grotesque about the possibility of having a baby?"
nothing is grotesque about the possibility of having a baby. But thinking jake and Austin could presently hide a babe whereas they already get pressure trying to dissimulate their supposed relation, is a non sense to me.
I'm not saying that there is a baby, but of course they could hide it. It's not like we see much of their private life and paparazzi don't follow them around.
But that damn assistant of his and the blonde baby mama (?) look quite similar...
A hidden kid, people? That bullshit is worst than the story of Richard Gere putting a hamster in his ass.
Did Ted C. invented that one too?
^^ Please Shut Up ^^
PLEASSEEEE, I just gotta know about BabyTile. I'm not going to work until I find out if that's babytile in Rome. What's Ted's number. I'll call him myself. Can someone Please ask Ted how old is babytile PLeaseee? I can't stand it.
Jake, let me se BaBytile. Heelllpppppp
6:49 No Academy Award for you trolly
Even if he has a baby, it's his life who cares.
The sad thing about him, except for a potentially hidden baby is that his career is going down hill. I don't think PoP will be all that. He's slowly going down hill. All the baby hiding business (if that's the case) was unnecessary. He was big in 2005(06), I doubt he'll ever be as successful. When people find out about a hidden baby they'll pity him and laugh at him. He'd be the laughing stock of Hollywood.
Poor trolly! First Jake dumped the bitch who supposed to make him look straight and then BT strikes back! lol
Note to you Jake, if you or some of your people happen to read this blog:
You aren't as big as you think, pal!
Poor trolly! First Jake dumped the bitch who supposed to make him look straight and then BT strikes back! lol
I think you misunderstand, I'm sure no one here approved of him with Witherspoon. But BT is a mess he got himself into (if it exists that is). It's sad and pathetic. I think his fans want him to impress them as an actor and not read about him being a homophobic gay who is hiding babies. That's the act of a lunatic and most here probably don't want him to be a lunatic.
When people find out about a hidden baby they'll pity him and laugh at him.
Did they laugh at Ricky? Homophobes wouldn't approve, but the rest of the public would love it!
Did they laugh at Ricky? Homophobes wouldn't approve, but the rest of the public would love it!
What is the matter with you? We've seen pics of him and his supposed bf all the time. People knew about him using a surrugate mother and he even showed pics of himself with the babies. He never hid them, always was a proud father.
You CAN NOT compare these two cases for crying out loud!
BT is HIDDEN for about 2 fucking years!
You CAN NOT compare these two cases for crying out loud!
There is no obligation for celebrities to discuss their kids and no one would blame Jake for wanting privacy.
I think you misunderstand, I'm sure no one here approved of him with Witherspoon.
Trolly approved and trolly is always here :)
I think his fans want him to impress them as an actor and not read about him being a homophobic gay who is hiding babies.
A gay actor brave enough to have a kid in Hollywood closet.
7:19 and 7:22 - not only Jake seems to be a lunatic, some of his fans too it seems.
You think it's oh so romantic that he maybe has a baby with Austin. You don't see the morbidity of it. Like someone said, it's hopeless with some BT believers/supporters.
It's already pathological obsession.
A gay actor brave enough to have a kid in Hollywood closet.
Your whole sentence is a contradiction woman. The thing is, he is not brave. Ricky Martin is brave for showing his children, Jake who is allegedly hiding his is not!
Having a kid would be brave.
7:27 AM - Trolly talking about "pathological obsession"?! LOL, what a joke!
If BT is the baby in Paris, then Jake goes outside with his kid and they are out and open about it with their friends and family in their daily life. The kid is only hidden from the general public.
It's hidden very well then, because there are no sightings, tweets, pics (except for maybe that one unintentional in Paris).
^^Also no one is talking about the infant. I don't even think they can talk to that many people about the kid, because you can not trust everyone.
there are some suspicious sightings and pics with evidence of a baby. we discussed all of this here in the past days.
Awwwww my French blow up doll back when it was shiny and new...and clean.
we discussed all of this here in the past days.
You mean the pathologically obsessed saw whatever fits in with their BT fantasy
I don't remember, or maybe I missed it, what sightings are you talking about 7:37 PM?
Baby foot print pic on Jake's shorts when he is coming out of the doctors' office :)
"what sightings are you talking about 7:37 PM?"
This summary was posted here a few days ago. There are other pics and sightings that point to a baby in addition to the nanny/BT in Paris: The ultrasound pic around the first baby tile blind item, the baby dribble stain pic at the Brothers screening, the stroller in Paris being unloaded from the trunk of their car, Jake photographed at a playground in London, the baby’s coat next to him at a London restaurant pic, a baby footprint stain on his shorts coming out of the doctors office, sightings of Reeke with ‘another family’ in London (bg, nanny and bt), sighting of Reeke with Paul Rudd and two kids in Washington (when Paul has just one kid and Reese’s kids were in LA with Ryan), Jake’s excessive privacy requirements for the London house, having a whole secluded building for him in Morocco and threatening with a lawsuit if they publish his location in SC when he filmed Nailed...
Baby dribble stains on the shoulder area of his sweater at the Brothers screening in 2008 :)
Thanks for the recap, 7:54 AM!
7:54 AM, you know all this may be true, but for Jake's sake I hope it's not.
"Note to you Jake, if you or some of your people happen to read this blog:"
I hope he has better things to do, unless he wants to have fun.
I want to have fun!
Jake said...
I want to have fun!
I thought it's girls who wanna have fun? ;)
That Paris woman looks kind of creepy.
Chut up, 8:14 AM!
That Paris woman looks worn out and concentrated on the baby :)
but please the ricky affair is in all aspects different than jake one.
Jake/austin are supposed hidding a baby and one supposed to have faked a relation during 3 years with a mom of 2 kids while the other start an "ambivalent" relation with a co star.
Jake exposed himself with rese kids like he was the perfect stepdaddy! I understand some stars desire privacy concerning their kids but here we have guys who would hide a kid in "a box" pretending he/she never existed.
You cannot compare with ricky who never hide his kids.
Ricky is closeted gay and has twins through surrogate mother.
Jake is closeted gay and has a kid through surrogate mother.
It is the same woman. She obviously had a nose job to make the nose appear thinner, it has like two holes on each side (like Michelle's nose). The mouth form is identical even though the mouth appears thinner in Paris. The ears are the same, the chin, the face, the hair. It is the same woman.
Nanny!
I would just add ricky kids aren't harrassed by paps and we aren't invaded by tons of pics of them. It's clear he give importance to their safety, nevertheless he doesn't ashamed to talk about them in interview.
BT doesn't exist in jake/austin public world, he/she is like a dirty secret. Hard to think two guys like them wouldn't have any consideration for their own kid.
In conclusion BT believers can't expect the agrement of all the community on his existence,in many aspects it goes too far.
In conclusion BT believers can't expect the agrement of all the community on his existence
I think BT believers don't expect that and there is nothing wrong with TBs having different opinions about BT.
8:25: Her nose appears thinner and longer in the pics from 2007, the Paris pic in 2008 the nose looks different, not long and thin but a bit of a piggy nose, did she have a reverse nose job? her lips also seem to have dissapeared in a year, the pics from 2007 with her mouth closed her bottom lip is full, did she have the botox removed a year later?
8:23 Ricky announced to the world he had twins by a surrogate.
Jake paraded around with Reese's kids playing stepdaddy.
Yes. I just see on OMG someone sent pics with theory to gossip mags.
I think it's wrong to send this info to gossip mags. This was a troll for sure trying to make OMG and WFT2 look bad.
However, no magazine will publish this because they work with the PR approved line.
Only a foreign tabloid (like "news of the world" for example that goes searching for scandal) would pursue the story but nobody will believe it anyway. At most, it'll result in another story dismissing the rumors like the enquirer did in the past.
8:38 AM #1 - Botox, lol?! Sorry you are wrong (as you know), it is the same nose and the same woman.
Collagen lip injections can add significant volume to the lips, creating a pout effect that lasts for months.
Only a foreign tabloid (like "news of the world" for example that goes searching for scandal) would pursue the story but nobody will believe it anyway.
Nobody believed it when BT story was published on the Internet few years ago (Jonathan Jaxon).
Jonathan Jaxon said himself after it was bullshit.
MrShea: #awkwardmoments When another guy tells u how hot Jake gyllenhall looked in Jarhead.
about 2 hours ago
Jonathan Jaxon said himself after it was bullshit.
No, he didn't.
Did you lie about "Us Weekly posting pic of Jake and Reese walking behind the woman and the baby" on OMG?
"No, he didn't.
Did you lie about "Us Weekly posting pic of Jake and Reese walking behind the woman and the baby" on OMG?"
no it wasn't me for the pic but concerning jaxon I am sure he did say that. I even remember when this moron published his list of "who is gay/bi in hollywood" jake wasn't on it.
Jonathan Jaxon's opinion is worthless. The point is that BT story is already published.
to be fair the whole jaxon story was really weird.
"The point is that BT story is already published."
How that?
What was weird about it? Jaxon tried to make money with Toothy story and failed.
yes he surey tried but has been humiliated.
Humiliated because no one believed the story about Jake, Austin, Chris and BT.
Dear Ted:
Why would actresses like Reese Witherspoon and Katie Holmes enter into long-term relationships with men like Tom Cruise or Jake Gyllenhaal?
—Dumbfounded
Dear Curious:
These "relationships" are as mutually beneficial and unbeneficial to the women as they are to the men. Both sides are getting something out of it. And who the hell knows, maybe true love's actually involved?
August 27, 2007
Jake Gyllenhaal is Gay and Having a Baby
Former Hollywood publicist Jonathan Jaxson says that Jake Gyllenhaal is planning to come out some time by the end of next month. Jake is reportedly ready to come out because he and his boyfriend of several years (rumored to be actor Austin Nichols or Chef Chris Fischer) are expecting a baby in September.
Jake Gyllenhaal has been dating the same guy for years. Last year Jake and his bf were arrested and brought into the West Hollywood station after the sheriffs office was called after catching Jake and his bf having sex in an SUV behind the restaurant Chin Chins in LA. Both were later released. Jake has been dating this guy for years, even before he broke up with Kirsten Dunst. Kirsten Dunst found out about his bf and confronted him at Chateau Marmont. The confrontation was loud and they broke up right there. News of their break-up followed a few days later. Jake and his bf are currently expecting a baby through a surrogate. They used a company based in Westwood, CA. The baby is due in September."
This is a malicious lie, because there's no way Jake Gyllenhaal is gay. He's an A-list actor who's dated a ton Hollywood actresses. They just never take pictures together. And they're never seen together. When he's not with beautiful women, he just hangs out with his totally heterosexual friends and does stuff like shopping and talking long walks on the beach. You know, regular guy stuff.
www.idontlikeyouinthatway.com
Jake Gyllenhaal is Gay and Having a Baby
Nice pictures! :)
It was Ian Halperin that investigated BT and said that it was BS.
It was Ian Halperin that investigated BT and said that it was BS.
Link please or you're a liar.
It was Ian Halperin that investigated BT and said that it was BS.
No, you made that up.
first jaxon published his "scoop" literally plagied on Ted gossip but at time didn't know exactly the identity of boyfriend!
Then he played detective concerning the baby and asked ( don't know why) Perez hilton if this story was true. Then he said on this blog he called austin father!! about the born of the baby and finally on september he wrote on his blog the baby story was totally false and at the end he wasn't sure anymore about jake sexuality.
after that he stoped talking about this affair and ignored jake on his "who is gay" list!
JAKE GYLLENHAAL HITS THE ROOF OVER LATEST GAY RUMOR
Baby claim last straw for ‘Brokeback’ star
“Brokeback Mountain” star Jake Gyllenhaal is fuming over Internet rumors that he’s gay and having a child with his male lover!
The hunky screen star – who played Heath Ledger’s homosexual lover in the controversial Oscar-winning film – says he had enough with the anonymous Web site jabs that he’s more than just buddies with actor Austin Nichols.
“Jake’s been a good sport over gay rumors – up till now,” a source close to the 26-year-old star told The ENQUIRER.
He even went as far as spoofing himself when he hosted “Saturday Night Live.” He mugged for a crowd of “gay cowboys” planted in the audience and also did a dead-on impression of Jennifer Holliday singing “And I Am Telling You” dressed in drag!
Jake – who’s dated “Spider-Man” beauty Kirsten Dunst and Natalie Portman of “Star Wars” – has always been the first to laugh at the Hollywood gay buzz because he’s straight, the source said.
But he stopped laughing when an Aug. 28 story on the celebrity Web site Jossip carried the headline: “Jake Gyllenhaal is gay and having a baby!”
That report was picked up from an obscure Web site called IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com – which linked him to Nichols, star of the HBO series “John from Cincinnati.”
The site quoted an unnamed “former Hollywood publicist” claiming: “Jake Gyllenhaal is planning to come out some time by the end of next month…He and his boyfriend of several years, rumored to be actor Austin Nichols, are expecting a baby in September.”
The site ran a photo of longtime pals Jake and Austin sitting together and laughing at a basketball game.
“Jake has been dating this guy for years, even before he broke up with Kirsten Dunst,” according to the IDontLikeYouInThatWay.com report.
“Kirsten found out about his bf and confronted him at Chateau Marmont. The confrontation was loud and they broke up right there. News of their breakup followed a few days later.
“Jake and his bf are currently expecting a baby through a surrogate. They used a company based in Westwood, Calif. The baby is due in September.”
The story – which pals swear is pure fiction – incensed Jake.
“There were all kinds of rumors that Jake was gay after ‘Brokeback Mountain.’ Apparently, some people don’t realize that he was just acting,” another pal told The ENQUIRER."
"It was Ian Halperin that investigated BT and said that it was BS."
anyway Ian halperin never admit jaustin as a couple.
Jake – who’s dated “Spider-Man” beauty Kirsten Dunst and Natalie Portman of “Star Wars” – has always been the first to laugh at the Hollywood gay buzz because he’s straight, the source said.
LOL!
no wonder nobody believe it, reading like that it sounds ridiculous.
After years of bearding, it will sound even more ridiculous.
yes it sounds ridiculous but how telling otherwise?
If tomorrow Ted follows the same way, will he be discredited like jaxon ?
Ted will never out Jake and he's talking about BT for years - that's it, Ted already had done all he could do.
Stupid trolly will never learn.
I would just add ricky kids aren't harrassed by paps and we aren't invaded by tons of pics of them. It's clear he give importance to their safety, nevertheless he doesn't ashamed to talk about them in interview.
BT doesn't exist in jake/austin public world, he/she is like a dirty secret. Hard to think two guys like them wouldn't have any consideration for their own kid.
ITA with this, and the comment about Jake playing stepdad. He is nothing like Ricky Martin.
"Ted will never out Jake and he's talking about BT for years - that's it, Ted already had done all he could do."
What he had done? Isn't it a bit convenient to stay hidden behind BI ?
10:32 AM, Ian said that Jake is gay, check out his site.
What he had done?
Everything he could. Ted said that Toothy/Jake is gay and that there is BT.
Isn't it a bit convenient to stay hidden behind BI ?
Ted works for E!, gets paid by E! and plays by E! rules.
Ian Halperin never said BT didn't exist. He said he was investigating and was going to talk about it but he never did. He got into other bigger topics like Michael Jackson and Brangelina and forgot about Jake.
The guy is just looking for scandal. He is not credible at all. Did you see his site lately? His posts are lame.
Ted doesn't out people. He repeated a thousand times that it's up to the person to come out and that he won't out anybody.
The National Enquirer September 17, 2007
Posted on OMG by NE-Star
NE lost all their credibility since they were bought by Star. They publish everything PR approved. Investigated or not, they had to go with 'Jake is straight'. Just this week they have a BS story about the big romance of Jake with Jen Aniston.
NE lost all their credibility since they were bought by Star. They publish everything PR approved. Investigated or not, they had to go with 'Jake is straight'. Just this week they have a BS story about the big romance of Jake with Jen Aniston.
Just this week they have a BS story about the big romance of Jake with Jen Aniston.
Did anyone read that?
"Did anyone read that?"
A summary was posted yesterday here. It must be somewhere on the comments. It was some fiction about Jen flirting with Gerard Butler and Jake during the Golden Globes weekend to prove she was hotter than Angelina and that she thinks Jake is the one who has potential for a long term relationship.
Thanks 10:48 AM!
I get emails from the Courage Campaign that is working on the repeal of DADT. They sent one around this morning written by Lt. Choi. He ended it with this beautiful line:
And I'm not going to hide my love. Love is worth it.
"Ted doesn't out people. He repeated a thousand times that it's up to the person to come out and that he won't out anybody."
Ted outed a lot of people dear but people forget it.
Name and link please.
10:38: He said on his podcast that BT doesn't exisit and Jake and Austin were not together, he did say that he was gay.
He didn't post it, it was posted here already. It wasn't discussed on OMG for the obvious reasons.
NE broke the John Edwards scandal while Edwards was still in the race. They don't care about protecting some B-list actor like Jake.
10:38: He said on his podcast that BT doesn't exisit
Liar.
You keep forgeting that you aren't the only one following gossip.
NE broke the John Edwards scandal while Edwards was still in the race. They don't care about protecting some B-list actor like Jake.
Of course they do, tabloids don't want pissed off PR firms.
Ian Halperin never said in the podcasts that BT doesn't exist. He said he was investigating and would publish his findings soon but he never did. He moved on to other people.
NE pushed Reeke non-stop with tons of stories about their engagements and marriage plans, and linked Jake with Anne, Jen Aniston, models, etc etc since the Reeke 'break up'. They are not following the PR approved line of course.
PR doesn't care what tabloids say about Jake as long as what they're saying supports their "Jake is straight" campaign.
10:38: He said on his podcast that BT doesn't exisit and Jake and Austin were not together, he did say that he was gay."
He also said that Jake had been in love with Heath. I kid you not. He said that.
"PR doesn't care what tabloids say about Jake as long as what they're saying supports their "Jake is straight" campaign"
it's the reason why they love ted.
The truth is nobody will investigate this story. Jake's secret is safe. The media is bought and follow the PR approved line. Nobody will out him.
"The truth is nobody will investigate this story. Jake's secret is safe. The media is bought and follow the PR approved line. Nobody will out him."
Blogs are bought too?
"Blogs are bought too?"
Yes, I think so. they all follow the PR line too. I can't think of any blog that would investigate and publish a story with substantial proof. I always thought that TMZ has proof about Jake but they don't out. they hint but mostly go with the PR line.
TMZ aren't a PR blog if they had real proof I bet they would have done anything to have the scoop first!
I don't see TMZ outing anybody and they must have proof about many gay actors, not just Jake.
Good point, 11:43 AM.
Poor trolly, having a meltdown at OMG and possibly here, talking to itself about investigations into Jake's life.
Meanwhile GB has had about 10 comments in the past 24 hours, and half of those came from UV and FL. Probabl another reason why trolly is here.
Troll loves absurdity, Troll loves WFT
Trolly loves BT :)
The media is bought and follow the PR approved line. Nobody will out him.
Thank U Moses!
OT but LOL is this news worth reporting? from USWeekly: "Exclusive: Oops! Jessica Simpson Farts During Business Meeting"
LOL :)
Oops! I did it again!
Trolly loves BT
.....
^^^ Now look what you've done! lol
awwwwww bad trolly made sweet BT cry!
Jee, where's Jakey been lately?
Oh wait! With BT of course!
"I'm spending a lot of time with daddy now since that mean aunt Reese is out of our lives"!
Yippee!!!
Bad, bad trolly!
Atti, quit stolling, it's your turn to babysit!
^awwwwww so sweet! BT and Atti, a perfect match :)
Are James Franco and Agyness Deyn dating?! A source claims they met at a New York Cinema Society event last month and, "Agyness and James have met since and are very keen on each other. There is a real connection." [Contact Music]
Here's a typical day in the life of Gerard Butler: Attend a Haiti benefit in Santa Monica, head to Venice Beach with friends, chat with a woman playing a violin in the street for a few minutes, then make out with her. [People]
Ugh Franco! This guy is so overrated as an actor and pretentious as hell. He had a good year 2008, probably the best he'll ever have professionally.
I'll take Joseph Gordon Lewitt or Gosling any day over him.
Natalie Portman has a new man: Benjamin Millepied, the New York City Ballet dancer who's choreographing her new movie, The Black Swan. There's a slight problem, however: He had a live-in girlfriend when they met. A source says: "She had been talking about marrying him and was blindsided by the split." Ouch. This column asks, "Is Natalie Portman a home wrecker?" [Page Six]
When you connect two objects with a straight line, if a third object is also on that line it will continue to be so, no matter what angle it's viewed from. In other words, if viewed head on, they will be one behind the other; if viewed from the side (90 deg) they will be one next to another; if viewed from some other angle, they will be at a diagonal, but still along the same line.
So lets draw a line through our two objects and see what falls on that line, shall we?
Stop the video at 00:33. Note the shadow of the guy in the white shirt is behind Reese's feet. Now draw a line through the heads of Reese and the lady in pink. Extend that line out. Who's also on that line? They guy with the backpack, in the party of four.
Stop the video at 00:34. Draw a line through the heads of Reese and the lady in pink. Who's also on that line? The guy with the backpack.
Stop the video at 00:35. Note the shadow is even with Reese's feet. Draw a line through the heads of Reese and the lady in pink. Yes, we have backpack guy.
Stop the video at 00:36. Note the shadow is now in front of Reese. Draw your line. Who do we have? Backpack guy!
Do the same with the pictures 30 and 31. Who do we have in a line? Reese, pink lady, and backpack guy, that's who.
There are two cones at the corner of the flower bed. One has white on the bottom, and one has orange one the bottom. You can see them both clearly at 00:31 on the video. You can see one or the other of them in the pictures. That's the angle, not some 90 deg out of the frame. Backpack guy and his party are walking toward the corner from left to right. The HEAD guy with the yellow shirt is walking toward that same corner from right to left (look at the angle of his shoulders). They should have crossed paths, no? They didn't.
Pic 29 just doesn't fit.
No worries though! Nobody is paying attention, even on this Toothy obsessed blog. The real world will never know or care!
I'm just pointing out what's right in front of our eyes.
"Gay people, at least women that I know who have children, they're all friends with their exes. You know, it's not the same heterosexual paradigm, where they break up and everybody's mad and nobody talks and there's tension. It's not like that. We worked for a very long time to try to find a solution, and when we realized we couldn't, we worked to have a transition into something different, so it's been a long process and everything's OK." — Rosie O'Donnell. [The Daily Beast]
RIP J.D. Salinger
Pic 29 just doesn't fit.
What is your explanatin? Pictures aren't in sequence and there are more pictures missing?
Here's the Paris park video again.
video
It may be BT or not, but Jake does a pretty good job at ignoring cute BT (?) and the pretty nanny.
Oops, bad link!
“Pic 29 just doesn't fit.”
1:39PM, I definitely follow your reasoning and I think that you are into something big. You have wonderful attention to detail.
I just don’t know how to explain it. What is your theory? Did they re-shoot the photo op like a scene in the movie and the extras changed positions? Or could it be that they took out some pics from the set where it was visible that Ava was talking with the Nanny/BT? photoshopped?
The thing that is really curious is that the sequence of the pics and video match perfectly in the other pics, but ‘head’ guy doesn’t appear in the video and Reese not even once looked to her left in the video either and both things appear in pic 29.
The mystery of pic 29 is almost as big as ‘the last supper’ pic on McBongo's beach party ;)
Here we go again!
vid
Hope it works now!
The only three things that seem to make the theory a bit less than perfect is that it makes no sense to take BT to an arranged op. He could have taken the kid with him later or on another day w/o pap attention. He didn't have real business there, except accompany Reese, so he could have taken his time for the kid. The other two minor things are the nanny's nose and lips. But since she seems fond of plastic surgery, it's possible she changed her nose even more but stopped lip collagen injections. There's really an unbelievable similarity there no doubt.
It works!
It may be BT or not, but Jake does a pretty good job at ignoring cute BT (?) and the pretty nanny.
Duh! Jake is posing for more than one paparazzi, of course he's ignoring BT and nanny.
"it makes no sense to take BT to an arranged op."
why not? Nobody knew the baby exists so everybody focused on Reeke, like we did. It's the perfect 'hiding in plain sight'. Reeke being the focus allowed him to have the baby around. If it wasn't for the baby stroller in the car at the hotel, we wouldn't have searched for other clues. And he got to spend time with his kid when the photo op finished.
He could have taken the kid with him later or on another day w/o pap attention.
My guess - Jake was there to do photo op for Us Weekly and spend some time with nanny and BT after that.
The other two minor things are the nanny's nose and lips.
Nah, they fit.
1:54PM,
Well, aside from all-out fuckery, the only explanation is that the pictures are in order and 29 was taken before the video starts to roll. That would have been a hot second to have had no sign of our foursome, no sign of Ava, no sign of Nanny Brown, and to have had HEAD guy clear the field completely a second later--all while white shirt guy's doing the bob and weave in close proximity. Nanny Blonde's head is in line with the cone, so that's the line of sight we have to have when comparing it to the video. Possible, maybe.
Regardless, yes, there are pictures missing--the ones with Ava walking next to and interacting with the Nannies and BT. Basically everything that happens between 29 and 30 that would make anyone question, or obstruct the sight of Jake and Reese with other members of their entourage.
Whether by design, or by luck, paps and rags are not focused on what goes on outside of a clear shot of Jake. They do not want expose shit--they just want to get the shot of their main guy. He could have a baby or a boyfriend out and about with him all the time and we would never know.
"Hiding in plain sight", exactly. Ted has indicated Jake has felt like he can get away with almost anything, daring anyone to out him. As long as he keeps his distance, I guess he can.
This video from Splashnews has some footage from the Paris photo op. It's interesting that it is heavily edited and the part of nanny/BT is left out. It has some additional scenes that don’t appear in the French video on voici.fr
(Paris is from 0:09)
Splash video
"Splash video"
In the part that Jake points with the camera to take a picture, is he pointing up, to a focus point in front of him parallel to the level of his head beyond Ava? Could he be photographing BT? They also bought some boat toys that don’t appear in any of the pics.
I wonder how many times Austin and BT were around Jake in all the countless photos that Jake appears to be alone, and they were edited out.
I haven't weighed in on the Nanny/Assistant yet.
I think it's the same person. Her lips are pursed (making them appear thinner), her head is down (giving us a different view of her nose)--basically she's contracted, not wanting to draw attention to herself.
I think the pics between 29 and 30 were edited out because it was visible that Ava was interacting with the nanny and BT.
Atti, quit stolling, it's your turn to babysit!
Can I eat the baby?
It's clear that the french video has been edited down; wish we knew what was on the missing bits.
I think that is very likely 3:14.
Her lips are pursed
Could be why they look thinner. Yeah. If there wasn't this unbelievable similarity, I wouldn't believe all this at all. So, now I'm kinda "IDK" about it.
Can someone please repost the nanny/assistant pictures for comparison, all 4 please side by side. Thanks!
1:39 you're insufferable and delusional. Stop making up things in your mind to fit some conspiracy theory about the vid and pics. The logistics of the scene and camera angles has been explained to you over and over, yet you still continue to ignore it and bend the rules of physics and common sense to fit your asinine, cockamamie theory. Give and up and please, stop embarrassing this blog.
Geez 3:26. Why don't you look for them yourself by doing a search on the last 4 pages? You expect us to find it because you're too lazy to do it yourself? Grow up.
You expect us to find it because you're too lazy to do it yourself? Grow up.
What does it have to do with growing?
Btw. I've already found them myself.
Pics repost
3:26, here are the explanations of the camera/vid angles and scene logistics. Take time to read them, please. As for the posters above who agreed with 3:26, you are either 3:26 him/herself or gullible and just as desperate as 3:26 to believe a ridiculous conspiracy theory. Unbelievable.
Explanation 1
Explanation 2
Addendum to Explanation 2
3:38, anyone who comes on here, makes a request for info already posted within the last few days and expects someone else to look for it and post the link, is immature and needs to grow up.
3:27, why so rude?
Actually, I explained logistics and camera angles far better than you. Physics, I'm afraid, are on my side.
I can't explain what we don't see, but I can explain what we DO see.
As I stated, it is possible 29 was taken before the video started. My speculation about re-takes, was just that--speculation. At this point I'm leaning toward the former. None of that negates the fact that there was some very selective editing going on.
As far as camera angles are concerned, you're just out-matched.
Sorry you are embarrassed.
Sorry here's a corrected link: Explanation 1
In the video at the end it seems Reese is telling Jake that there are photographers, she looks annoyed, he turns to the left where the camera guy or guys are filming them and he looks annoyed too, visible in pic 29 (annoyed look). Maybe it was not a planned op after all. You don't always spot the papz right away when they are filming you.
I think it was a planned photo op and that nanny/BT joined them earlier than expected or she wasn't edited out well.
Bullshit, 3:50 #1. Absolute bullshit. It is so freakin unbelievable that you don't see that pic #29 is when the guy was at his farthest point away from Reese - when he was entering the frame behind her and to her far left. It is shown on the video. Also, pic #29 was taken straight on by the photographer, while the others were taken from a slightly left angle. THE REASON WHY HIS SHADOW CHANGES IN RELATION TO HER BODY IS BECAUSE SHE WAS WALKING BASICALLY IN A STRAIGHT LINE WHILE HE WAS COMING FROM THE LEFT, MOVING IN BEHIND HER, AND THEN PASSING HER ON HER LEFT.
THE REASON WHY SOME PEOPLE IN THE BACKGROUND WERE NOT IN THE FRAME IS BECAUSE THEY WERE OUT OF THE RANGE OF THE FRAME.
Your theory doesn't hold water. Seriously, if you can't understand the simple logistics of these pics, which btw are confirmed on the vid, it's because you don't want to. I'm done trying to explain the obvious to you - it's like hitting my head against a wall. Unfuckingbelievable.
LOL does this sound familiar? PR needs some new beard scriptwriters.
In Touch Exclusive:
Bradley Cooper is ring shopping!
What started out as a summer fling may end with a quickie engagement ring! According to an insider, after dating for just six months, Renée Zellweger and boyfriend Bradley Cooper are planning to walk down the aisle. “Bradley has fast-tracked the romance and he’s ready to get married,” explains the insider, who adds that a wedding will take place sooner than later. In fact, the Hangover star is so eager to tie the knot, that before appearing on Late Show with David Letterman on January 7, Bradley took the time to shop for a ring in New York. “He already has a setting he likes, but he visited various jewelers on 47th Street, including I. Friedman & Son, to look for a stone,” the insider reveals. The actor even went alone so he wouldn’t draw attention to himself. “He wore a hat and dark glasses and just walked right in.” The couple, who have each been married before, may be moving fast, but that doesn’t mean that Bradley, 35, won’t pop the question in a traditional way. “He is old-fashioned,” the insider says. “He’ll probably get down on one knee and propose in a romantic setting — and I wouldn’t be surprised if it was on Valentine’s Day.”
^^I was going to bold the parts identical to the Reeke stories but shit, there's too many. It would have been all bolded.
3:43 I did read your explanations again, as I did the first time, and I think you could be right about the guy in the white shirt coming from Reese's far left. That is the ONLY thing that explains the shadow placement, and the only thing that indicates that 29 was taken before the video. No way, no how, was that picture taken during or after the video, however. Given that it looks like he passes her at that point, as he does in the video, it was, I think, a fair interpretation. But I already stated that. I stand by my analysis.
What struck me when rereading your posts, was how vitriolic you quickly became, especially given how you stated you believe in BT and that he was there. I can't even say that for sure. I was just explaining what I saw, and just how curious pic 29 really is.
We could have put our noggins together, for crying out loud. Why are you so angry?
I love the title ONTD gave the Bradley Cooper ring story: VGBB Buys Ring For Beard
VGBB: Victor Garber's Bottom Bitch
Bradley Cooper is ring shopping!
Awwww, they are cute and always look so happy together! *where did I put my new hat*
BT nanny - 4 pics side-by-side
BT nanny - 2 pics side-by-side
LOL. This is like we are detectives in a tv show and searching for clues and finally spotting the mysterious blonde in a picture that could be the answer to all of our questions. Now we just need a face analyst to confirm that the assistant is indeed the nanny.
No way, no how, was that picture taken during or after the video, however.
Bullshit. The vid shows the guy coming into the frame from the upper left side. Sorry that the vid didn't start a second sooner to show his full entrance from stage left but the vid wasn't about him.
Same thing about any pics with Ava. The point of the French paps was to get pics of Reese, who cares about her rugrats. The vid recorded Ava, because it had a wider fixed focal range. The paps cameras did not.
I cannot believe you think everyone in the park in the vid and pics are extras who had to re-do the scene. LOL
vitriolic you quickly became
When I have to explain over and over something anyone with common sense could understand, yes I become angry. So what. Sue me.
We need to get Boner on the case.
I don't know what in the heck you two are talking about, or what you're trying to prove. But knock yourself out if it makes you happy.
If Boner's on the case I'd be more than happy to lend a hand!
4:53 #1, the links are there. Read about it if you want to.
Where are Ava and her nanny in picture 29?
Did you know that baby strollers are also called baby carriages? And in Great Britain they're known as prams. The stroller was invented by....
I would find it very sad if BT is true...
I have one request...Can you use your time on important things...like finding a cure for cancer. Some of you have great detective skills.
I would find it very sad if BT is true...
I feel the same.
4:54 #2, In the VID Nanny and Ava are walking in front coming in slightly from the left side. The PIC of that scene was taken a few seconds before the vid starts; you can tell because the guy in white is farther behind on the extreme right of the frame and not yet behind Reese. Nanny and Ava also were not in the frame yet. Also, please remember that the pic and vid are of two different perspectives, in distance, frame width, angle and focus. There is no conspiracy theory, only two different mediums at two different, albeit slightly, placement points.
I have one request...Can you use your time on important things...like finding a cure for cancer. Some of you have great detective skills.
Trolly, why don't you do the same, instead of spending all of your time obsessing on ways to prove to us Jake is not gay, doesn't have a boyfriend, and doesn't have a baby.
5:14 PM, I see. Thank you.
If Ava and Deacon knew about BT they probably didn't know that Jake is his daddy. They probably thought the blonde nanny is his mom and they are friends of Jake. It's the only explanation for me. Cause kids talk, it'd be unsafe telling them.
4:45 by before, I mean seconds before, and by during I mean during. No, it's not bullshit to say it is impossible that the pic was taken DURING (or after) the video, because it is. Didn't happen.
Given that impossibility, I speculated on possible explanations for the incongruity of pic 29. I think you and I agree on the likely explanation. If something is proven false (the coincidence of the vid and pic 29) then you brainstorm about what might be true. It was a leap, to be sure, but it's not beyond the realm of possibility that a couple of stars could get two or three people walking next to them to walk through an area again. But that's not likely what happened. It makes more sense that the picture was taken before, but we have scant evidence, beyond the erratic movements and the shadow of the guy in white. But like I said, shadows are important.
To my point in the first place, none of the portion of the video with Ava showed up in the pics. Which furthers my point--and yours--nobody cares (or nobody wants us to know) about the kids and the babies and the nannies. Which means anything could happen, all it takes is a few seconds for the cameras to stop clicking and you could hide anything.
Maybe if you assume the people you talk to DO have common sense and are intelligent and worthy of your respect, you wouldn't be so angry.
Come on, how would Ava and Deacon know anything about Jake and BT?! Reese talked to them about gay men, showmances and surrogate mothers?
I don't see TMZ outing anybody and they must have proof about many gay actors, not just Jake.
IA especially since Harvey Levin is gay. It's interesting because TMZ hardly if ever reported on Reeke; I think they knew it was fake and didn't go along with PR. Remember also that TMZ was the one that reported Jake in Austin's JFC trailer all day. IMO TMZ knows the score but just like how they knew about Chaz Bono's transgendering plans before anyone else and didn't report it until given the ok by her rep, I think they respect Jake's choice to not come out yet. They respect it, but they aren't going to support his bearding either - I think that's why they were so quiet about Reeke. They didn't even cover the "breakup" story.
5:31, sorry but I don't have time to read your nonsense.
Give it up 5.31. no one agrees with you and no one cares.
5:31 never got over the cancellation of the X-Files and is looking for a conspiracy to follow.
To my point in the first place, none of the portion of the video with Ava showed up in the pics. Which furthers my point--and yours--nobody cares (or nobody wants us to know) about the kids and the babies and the nannies. Which means anything could happen, all it takes is a few seconds for the cameras to stop clicking and you could hide anything.
Just to be precise: paparazzi never stop clicking, they take as many pictures as possible.
Paparazzi agency and/or PR will decide which pictures are OK to be used by tabloids and gossip sites.
"Paps are around a lot, yes. I see them all the time, but paps are also sent by the star's PR flacks. If Zach is in a picture, the publicist can yank it before it's sent to JustJared or Perez.
Believe me...
Hugh Jackman travels with the boyfriend a lot--he went to St. Barths and everything, and yet, you don't see him in the pictures--even though he's standing right there.
Paps are part of the Hollywood Machine as People Magazine or TMZ."
I doubt Reese passed herself off as dating Jake to her own kids, we never got any pdas when they were with the kids that I can recall.
It's also likely that they told Deacon and Ava that BT was the nanny's baby, and that she was a friend or assitant of Jake's.
5:45 I think you're right, generally, but you can hear the clicks pick up as soon as Ava gets out of the line of sight.
Give it up 5.31. no one agrees with you and no one cares.
What are you talking about?!
1. It is obvious that some of the pictures are missing
2. We know that PR can buy pictures from the agency and no one would ever see them.
5:48 PM - I noticed the lack of pda's when the kids were around too. No, she probably never told them he was her bf. Just a good friend who hung out with them.
They called me Gunkle Jake.
Bitches! You are my Gunkle!
1. It is obvious that some of the pictures are missing
2. We know that PR can buy pictures from the agency and no one would ever see them.
What's in the pictures or vid that you think are missing? Ava saying "Hi BT" and blowing a kiss?
What's in the pictures or vid that you think are missing?
Ava doing what we saw in the video. There were more than one paparazzi and some pictures are missing, that is more than obvious.
Post a Comment