Friday 22 January 2010

Splendour in the Grass

Heath Ledger
Heath Andrew Ledger


What though the radiance which was once so bright
Be now for ever taken from my sight,
Though nothing can bring back the hour
Of splendour in the grass, of glory in the flower;
We will grieve not, rather find
Strength in what remains behind...

- William Wordsworth

2,726 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   801 – 1000 of 2726   Newer›   Newest»
Baby Tile said...

"I'm so tired of hiding"!

Anonymous said...

Awwww :)

Anonymous said...

What will happen when BT starts to got to school? Is it's name Gyllenhaal or Nichols? Now it's about 3 years old.

Anonymous said...

If we can find out if there is indeed a pediatrican in that Medical building this will all make much more sense. Someone has got to know where that building is and what kind of doctors are in there.

Anonymous said...

There is NO baby. Repeat after me. There is NO baby.

bt said...

Someone please change my pamper, it's full of shit and piss.

Anonymous said...

10:46 PM, I'm surprised it wasn't found out yet.

Anonymous said...

Who thinks Austin and Jake are still together? If they are not, does Jake have the main custody?

Anonymous said...

There is NO baby. Repeat after me. There is NO baby.

How do you know?

east coast lovin! said...

Oh please, celebs go to that medical building all the time and take their kids, Reese and Ryan were seen tasking their kids their for check-ups but you already know this, stop playing dumb.

Like SK and the rest are pretending that they "stumbled" onto something when in fact that pictures of the stroller was known back in 2008. I though it belonged to deacon seeing that i have seversl kids that I put in strollers when shopping/travelling and they are 4 and 6.

That was the conclusion back then but for some reason it's being revisited with conviently saved pics, the same saved pics that were examined back then.

Hell, I even sent it off to Ted, no response but he kept on with BT.

Of course there is a peditrician there aling with very other type of Dr. OMG, you are a Sherlock Holmes! (eye roll).

Bpredom drives some to behave more nutty and desperate than usual.

Austin/sophia pics? Jake solo sightings again on the west Coast and not the East coast? But I though he moved East???

Anonymous said...

Lo, the trolls are nervous.

Anonymous said...

That was the conclusion back then but for some reason it's being revisited with conviently saved pics, the same saved pics that were examined back then.

Really? How odd that no one but you remembers. Why don't you do this: provide a link to the discussion so we can refresh our memory. Thank you in advance.

Hell, I even sent it off to Ted, no response but he kept on with BT.

Sure you did. Uh huh. Riiiight.

Anonymous said...

LOL troll at 11:05, you give yourself away every time.

Anonymous said...

jansises: @squoctobird lmfao @jamiewatson got a formspring's question assigning us all celebs to play in a movie abuot her life....

jansises: @squoctobird and she picked Jake Gyllenhaal for @TotallyQueer81

Anonymous said...

What was Austin doing in August of 2008? Was he filming OTH or somehing else? If not why not keep the kid at home with daddy #2? And if he was busy, why not not keep the kid with one of the family members that would care for the child properly?

I haven't looked at the Paris pics since 2008 so I went back. I noticed there no pics of that woman and her baby anywhere else just that brief time. Why did she decide to join them on their photo op then and not the other times?

Anonymous said...

Is Maggie going to hook Jake up to Kate?

And for the record, in case Ms. Witherspoon or as I call her Ms. Wonderful is larking this blog looking to sue now that Google is under fire, it was all Jake's fault. Reese is wonderful, sweet, smart, trusting, gorgeous and Jake is a fool not to go back to her on his knees.








Going to go hide from any sudden lightening strikes.

Anonymous said...

Look what happened when Maggie hooked up Jake with her friend and co-star Kiki?? Kiki turned out to be a junkie and maggie ended up hating her for tainting Jake.

Kate has a rep and not just sleeping sround but using the nose candy.

Anonymous said...

If we can find out if there is indeed a pediatrican in that Medical building this will all make much more sense. Someone has got to know where that building is and what kind of doctors are in there.

I have an idea. Why don't you jump on the next plane out west, scurry on over to the Med Center and report back to us if there is a baby doctor in the building. I know you won't sleep or eat until you find out if Jake was carrying a sonogram picture. Oh I know you just love the idea of "BabyTile". Report back to us what you find out.
I hope you find a life before you get back.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
destiny said...

I think that woman in the video and picture in Paris is the same one driving in the car with Jake. Same pointy chin. Would love to know when those were taken!

I remember the Reese stroller picture when it came out because I thought it was odd. But at that time there were no discussions here or at OMG about it belonging to Deacon or a doll, or any conversations at all that I can recall.

I agree with the people who say Ava would not run up and touch a baby she didn't know. Looks to me like maybe the nanny and BT were off somewhere away from the cameras, and perhaps joined up with Reeke and her kids too soon?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

PR's response to BT's discovery

Anonymous said...

Jake if you're out there here's a message to you. Please do not deny us our babytiles. We need to see him. Please Jake, just one picture. We fans still love ya. Oh, what's that noise I hear? Is that crying?
Is that you BaByTiles? Where are yoouuuuu?

I think Babytiles is in my closet yall. I'll be back.

Anonymous said...

Wow the 2 babbler trolls are posting like crazy! Doth protest too much....

prairiegirl said...

That video is something to watch. Ava is running up to that woman with the baby as if she's familiar with them. And the assistant is on the other side. When that vid first starts out, Deacon jumps out as if he sees something and boy, J & R jump up out of their chairs following suit. Then the video switches and it looks as if maybe Ava was walking closer to J & R, but then she trots ahead to catch up with the assistant and that's when she reaches up to briefly touch the baby's hand.

Uh, no that would not be reaching out to touch a cute baby because she runs up to the woman and immediately reaches up to touch the baby's hand. It would appear to me that she knows them. And in all the other pictures, the assistant has been walking with J&R and the kids all that time.

Why all of a sudden are these 2 women walking ahead of J&R. It's like watching the Secret Service the way J&R are walking behind these women.

And thanks to the person who put up that picture of Jake blowing up at that photog. When he wasn't even driving. He's protecting something, that's what it looks like to me. Why else would he be so angry looking?

Excellent work today, you guys.

Anonymous said...

I think that woman in the video and picture in Paris is the same one driving in the car with Jake. Same pointy chin. Would love to know when those were taken!

Pic 1 06-18-2007

Pics 2 and 3 06-25-2007

Anonymous said...

Hardly a peep out of the babblers all afternoon or evening over at GB. I suspect they all lurk over here and have been stunned into silence.

Anonymous said...

Guy working on music video in LA:

Jake Gyllenhaal just showed up. For some reason.
20 minutes ago


devdoyle

He has pics of what he's doing from an hour ago, maybe he'll get pics of Jake too. Wait and see..

Anonymous said...

Probably wouldn't have a baby in the front seat like that, but maybe a photo of some kind they don't want seen? And I think it is the same woman as the one in Paris.

Anonymous said...

Jake Gyllenhaal just showed up. For some reason.
20 minutes ago


He's out late (for him). Almost 10:00. Hmm I wonder if Wes the Production Guy is there (the mystery guy Unabomber Jake was hugging and practically humping on a WeHo street few years ago)

Anonymous said...

Why do people even doubt there is a baby tile. Ted has been asked about it several times and has said yes every time. How often does Ted come straight out with a yes. Usually he has a clever but vague response. Not so re baby tile. Its an outright yes.

Anonymous said...

BT is supposed to be born around October 2007. If the pics with the blonde in the car are from June 2007, then they are from before BT was born. But it could be that this woman used to work as an assistant and then she became BT’s nanny. What is best that someone who already knew them and they trusted her.

These pics of Jake hitting the photographer are from October 31 2007. This is after BT was born so it fits him being protective of the baby, not necessarily because the baby was with him in the car but because he was caught in a situation related to the baby. TMZ had the originals but IHJ didn’t include those particular ones in the set and they were taken in Beverly Hills where the doctors’ office is located: IHJ Oct 31 2007 Out in Beverly Hills.

I still think the blonde woman in Paris and in the car, is the same blonde woman with Jake in Morocco.

I believe Jake and Austin are still together and they have baby tile. I believe Ted, and he is constantly reinforcing that they are together and that BT exists.

Anonymous said...

Great detective work here. What is happening to us lately? There is a new energy and new discoveries. It's so good! :)

Anonymous said...

The evidence presented for a BT is overwhelming. The trolls have been sent packing due to the great detective work.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Great detective work here. What is happening to us lately? There is a new energy and new discoveries.

The person who posted the Splash pic of the stroller being unloaded from the car started it all. We can blame I mean congratulate them for lighting the fire. As for me (I posted the pics of the blond in the cars) I was supposed to do errands, paperwork and clean the cat box. It's amazing what you can accomplish spending hours on the internet when you avoid doing chores.

Anonymous said...

2:29 Hi UV

Frankie Valli said...

Oh, what a night,
What a baby, what a night! :)

Anonymous said...

PR's response to BT's discovery

LMAO!

Anonymous said...

Wow, great detective work guys!

update said...

Guy working on music video in LA:
Jake Gyllenhaal just showed up. For some reason.
20 minutes ago


Jake Gyllenhaal just showed up. For some reason.
about 5 hours ago

What!?! Lil' Jon is here. What?!?
about 3 hours ago

http://twitter.com/devdoyle

Jen said...

m calling it right now- jen aniston & jake gyllenhal are gonna date soon
about 3 hours ago

http://twitter.com/limonsito

Ashleigh Walmsley said...

My dreams last night. Damn. Jake Gyllenhaal was taking care of me because I thought Jennifer Aniston was dead.
5 minutes ago

http://twitter.com/AshFoo

Anonymous said...

Oh boy, I need a day off to read BT saga and check out every detail :)

Anonymous said...

I looked at that picture of the woman in Morroco, it doesn't look like her, she doesn't have a pointy chin. She has a Mariel Hemmingway look about her, the other has a pinty chin, big nose and a harsh look about her.

Where was Austin on August of 2008, working on OTH? If not why wasn't the baby home with him?

Why would Disney want Jake to Beard and yet pay for housing for him and BT while filming in Londod because studios do pay for stuf like that.

Why would Ryan allow Reese to drag the kids to UK/Paris with that side show?Reese knows about BT and parrently so do the kids so Ryan knows too.

Evelyn&Co wouldn't allow that happen during the Paris photo op.

The person that posted the viseo and pic sisn't just find it, it was discovered in 2008 and discussed via e-mails You know who you are) the blondes were discussed too, the conclusion was similat but not the same, I don't know why some are pretending otherwise.

I know I sent Ted this stuff back then along with the pic of the footprint, the sonogram pic, the pic of him in London park, etc.

Anonymous said...

Why would Ryan allow Reese to drag the kids to UK/Paris with that side show?

What BT has to do with Reese and her kids? Reese traveling around and using Jake and kids for tabloid covers and publicity was for the show, Ryan couldn't stop her. Why would anyone discuss BT in front of Reese's kids? Why would Reese's kids care about some woman (BT's nanny) and her baby?

Anonymous said...

^hi Trolly!

Anonymous said...

The person that posted the viseo and pic sisn't just find it, it was discovered in 2008 and discussed via e-mails You know who you are) the blondes were discussed too, the conclusion was similat but not the same, I don't know why some are pretending otherwise.

Trolly, you are exchanging e-mails with OMG / WFT2 posters?
I don't see anything wrong with that, I'm just curious how no one noticed that you are a troll.

prairiegirl said...

I remember reading back when Jake was filming in Morocco that the place he was staying at (which was beautiful because I do remember the pictures Special put up about it) was his exclusively. He had the entire building. Why would he need an entire building?

This particular trip to Paris, I'm not sure if Austin was filming at that time. Could be a simple case of Jake just wanting the baby with him. If Austin was filming at this same time, he would've at least been on the east coast to fly over to London. I believe the baby was over in London because remember Jake's need for his place to have an attached garage and so many bedrooms.

And we certainly know that Reese's kids weren't over there all that time staying.

I was also thinking about Ava's reach for the baby. One, she reached for the baby as soon as she was within reach. It's not like she ran up there to catch up with the asst. and then noticed the baby. "Ohhhh, cute baby!"

No, she ran up and the first thing she did as soon as she was up there, was reach for the baby. And it was a real brief touch. I can see the kids being told that they can't be seen touching the child during an outing like this. So she may have done it instinctively but then retracted her hand as if remembering that she's not supposed to. I don't know the whole scenario of how Ava & Deacon could know about BT and be counted on to keep silent about it. I honestly don't know. But this video does it for me.

It very well could have been someone from J or A's handling team who was monitoring last night and was trying to distract, scoff, and get everyone off track from BT discussion. Could've also been someone from JIS camp. But hopefully discussion of BT does not push either guy into doing something not originally planned.

prairiegirl said...

Oh boy, I need a day off to read BT saga and check out every detail :)


I was supposed to do errands, paperwork and clean the cat box.

LOL. Some of us are paying this morning for staying up late glued to our laptops. I know I am. But that's alright. It was worth it. It was one of those lightbulb, energetic, fun kind of evenings.

GUESS WHO said...

No one has answerd to where was Austin in August in 2008, was he filming? And if so why would he allow his 11 month old child to be dragged overseas with Reeke and not stay at home with him or their extended family.

If that PA pictured with Jake in 2007 is the same blonde in 2008 (I can't tell, all blondes look alike to me)with Evelyn grinning on the background, then that would me she signed off on BT's trip. BS.

Paris was a side business trip, Reese did the Vouge shoot, that means that not only did Disney pay for everything but Avon fit the bill for the hotel stay for the entourage. BS.

Kids talk, BT in London/Paris with the kids, BS and you know it Destiny, SK, PG and Stubborn who are all too dumb to realize they were exchanging e-mails with a 'troll".

Anonymous said...

All we know about Austin in the summer of 2008 is that he finished filming Prayers for Bobby in June 2008 and on July 15 he attended the Espys awards in LA. He didn’t start filming OTH until October 2008 and it was just sporadic days after that as he had a guest role. So from mid July until October 2008 he wasn’t spotted anywhere and he wasn't working. Probably Austin was in Europe with Jake and BT most of the time too.

Anonymous said...

If Jake knew there would be paps at that park in Paris, why even bother bringing the blond nanny & BT. They would have to keep their distance, so as not to arouse suspicion. BT may as well have been left in the broom cupboard.

Anonymous said...

If someone needs proof of where Austin was in the summer of 2008, here it is:

- Prayers for Bobby filming schedule: 21 May 2008 - 20 June 2008 in Michigan (source imdb). He filmed the parade scene June 17 pic

- He attended the Espys awards on July 15 pics

- His first day of filming OTH was October 2 pics

There is nothing between July 15 to October 2 2008, no pics or sightings. He was probably in Europe and Morocco with Jake and BT.

Coincidentally, Jake was photographed just once in that exact same period (from July 14 until October 3) and it was August 11 in the staged Reeke in the desert pics holding hands on set (IHJ)

Anonymous said...

1/25 11:15 pm, 1/26 6:10 am + 6:43 am = same troll, same shit, different day

Anonymous said...

And if so why would he allow his 11 month old child to be dragged overseas with Reeke

LOL kids and babies can and do travel, you know. They can even travel with one parent nowadays! You act as though Jake was a gypsy who sailed steerage to Europe and then hitchhiked from hostel to hostel with a baby on his back.

prairiegirl said...

Thank you, 07:06. Thank you for all your work.

I will not be deterred. I'll take the scoffing and the namecalling.

My mind won't be changed and I won't be quiet about it.

Off to work!! You all have a great day.

Anonymous said...

7:24 if you don't like what someone is saying, scroll past the post. We don't need someone on permanent troll watch to continually post about who is a troll, or the mindless "Hi Trolly" posts.

Anonymous said...

1/25 11:15 pm, 1/26 6:10 am + 6:43 am = same troll, same shit, different day

They are so rattled that they can hardly keep a thought together much less include all the words, and so nervous at the premise of a BT that their shaky hands are missing hitting a lot of keys on the keyboard, thus the major misspellings.

Anonymous said...

7:24 if you don't like what someone is saying, scroll past the post. We don't need someone on permanent troll watch to continually post about who is a troll, or the mindless "Hi Trolly" posts.

Troll at 7:30 - hi trolly! Don't like being pointed out, eh?

Dr B. Tee said...

Oh boy, I need a day off to read BT saga and check out every detail

You might get hit with a ~horrible migraine headache~ later this morning and have to go home and rest.

Anonymous said...

"You might get hit with a ~horrible migraine headache~ later this morning and have to go home and rest."

This will be another day when all of us will suddenly develop a migraine to go back home. Only Jake and Austin's porn manips or baby tile can achieve that! ;)

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

^Trolly's nervous today

Anonymous said...

They are so rattled that they can hardly keep a thought together much less include all the words, and so nervous at the premise of a BT that their shaky hands are missing hitting a lot of keys on the keyboard, thus the major misspellings.

lol dat is so trew

Anonymous said...

Guy working on music video in LA:

Jake Gyllenhaal just showed up. For some reason.

What!?! Lil' Jon is here. What?!?



Oh no. Possibly another music vid where Jake, surrounded by alcohol-induced owners of wanton vaginas, looks not like he's getting a hardon, but asking if they have any cute brothers.

BT said...

Jake and Austin's porn manips

Daddy what's porn? What mans nips you and Papa do??

Anonymous said...

lol dat is so trew

ey totley agre you

Florida Tom said...

That was some great work last night. I have not been able to see the video yet on my laptop. Hopefully I will when I get to my PC at home. Thanks to whomever did the work. I do think now there is some pretty credible evidence that a BT may exist.

Anonymous said...

I wrote Ted 2 questions a couple days ago, funnily enough 1 was about BT seen in public. The other was about set-up pap pics. I'm telling you this now, with enough of a description for you to recognize them but not detailed so they can be copied and messed with, in case Ted answers them in his column..and to prevent the "I know I sent Ted this stuff back then" troll from claiming after the fact that the questions came from him/her. Also I didn't "sign" my questions so if they get published it'll be interesting to see what sender names Ted gives them.

Anonymous said...

Disney and Reese are so supportive! Disney housing BT and Co and Reese acting like a decoy!
Paul Rudd in DC too!!

BT and PA/Nanny along for the Paris photo op, maybe if we can scan pics on IHJ at other Reeke phot-ops, we can spot PA/nanny BT too!

Anonymous said...

That particular Paris pic was taken on July 11, 2008 not August.

Anonymous said...

BT? And people call babblers delusional? No, I'm not nervous or a troll or whatever. But the idea of BT is absurd. If Ted C. is reading this, he's probably laughing his ass off that grown ups, even middle aged people, believe his bs. This site loses credibility with each day. I don't think JIS believers are threatened by it, I think they are laughing their asses off. I don't see anyone else mention this made up shit aka BT except for here. Taking BT to participate in photo ops in Paris. LMAO you guys. Sometimes I feel it's a kindergarten here.

Anonymous said...

I think people are addicted to read Ted's BI's in this case TT BI's and to write to him. He knows this and he plays with people who became obsessed with TT/BT. He throws some answers out there and moves on to another colum or BI, while the TT/BT obsessed spend their whole spare time to analyze etc. I don't think Jake is straight, but it's not because I believe that intellectual wannabe, arrogant prick.

Anonymous said...

Trollys are sweating now!

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

9:54 AM

How stupid can you be? YOU are spending your time on following US. Think about it. The laugh is on you.

destiny said...

Trolly, I have never communicated with anyone by email about all of this, and I seriously doubt Special, PG or Stubborn have either. We see right through you, you just want to make people think this was all considered before and rejected.

I do think paps can be bought off, and when you're working with a pap who is on speed-dial, well, they're basically your employer and you're probably not going to do anything to upset that. Not to mention the pap may have had no idea. As for the video, it came from a french source, so not beholden presumably to American PR people who will cut you off at the knees and not give you access to any of their clients if you don't play their game.

Jake had to work in London for PoP, and he took the side trip to Paris for Reeking. Don't forget that Ted has on more than one occassion talked about Jake arrogantly thinking he can get away with things and that he is fooling people. He probably thought he was safe in France where probably very few people really know who he is. That video only mentions Reese, not Jake.

Anonymous said...

The best is the "baby footprints" on Jake's shirt. Everytime I see this set of pics I have to lol.

Anonymous said...

The BabyTile Show is just so Damn Funny.

Ok, got my laugh in this morning. Now I'm off to Work and I can deal with the world. When the pressures of work get to heavy, I'll just think of BabyTiles stuck in Jake's closet with a bottle. And I'm alright again.

Anonymous said...

The thing is, it's hopeless, some posters desperately believe in the BT tale and nothing, no argument will change their minds.
So let's the baby talk continue. ;)

Anonymous said...

^^let

Anonymous said...

Stop calling people with adifferent opinions trolly.
My 2 cents:

The blonde in the Morocco pic is not the same blonde in Paris nor is she the same blonde in the series of blondie 2007 pics posted here. That Moroccon chick has petite features and sort of looks like Muriel Hemmingway, cross her off the list..

The blonde with the perm with Evelyn in the back seat looks younger and has a smaller nose than the Paris chick, cross her off the list.

The Blonde Reese look a like that paps mistook for Reese back in 2007: I first thought was the same blonde with the perm but she looks different, her feature are sharper, nose pointier. She looks closer to the Paris blonde but something is off, pointy chin yes but the foreheads are wrong, the Paris chick has a weird forehead and not attractive nose, the Reese clone nose is different.

Also the Paris woman is carrying the baby in a harness, craddling the baby's head, most nannies would just put the baby in the stroller, also the baby appears to be younger than 9-10 months.

The stroller is different than the one being un-packed, that one was a traveling stroller, the other one is just a regular stroller, looks to be a different color.

If you go to the pics on IHJ, you can see Jake lifting up Ava before she runs off tho join her brother and nanny, got of a shitty thing to do if BT was right in front of them.

The woman and baby appears in the same frame on a pic that has been on IHJ from day one and probably posted in Us weekly I bet.

Evelyn and Co would never allow BT/Nanny to be a apart of an arranged photo op.

There is yet another blonde in some photos from 2007, Jake sure likes blondes.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

the Paris woman is carrying the baby in a harness, craddling the baby's head, most nannies would just put the baby in the stroller

What the hell is wrong with you?

Anonymous said...

Jake sure likes blondes.

Not only he. Blonde women are more popular than brunettes, always have been. Think back, what hair color did the most popular girl in your school have? Mine were blondes. Didn't you hear, they supposely also have more fun. ;)

Anonymous said...

Jake likes men.

Anonymous said...

also the baby appears to be younger than 9-10 months

Read the posts. NO ONE said that BT was 9-10 months old.

Anonymous said...

It is common knowledge that the email exchanges that the OMG'ers had with a certain someone were in fact just one big troll. It's hard to admit when you are duped...

Anonymous said...

Here's some Paris vid stills of woman with stroller.

Anonymous said...

I'm sure Eveyln wouldn't have allowed BT to be in a formal pap shoot either. But accidents happen. The nanny probably thought they were done, she was not in any of the other shots, and if you watch the video, it looks like she was joining up with them.

And what was Evelyn going to do, call attention to the mistake by having the photo taken down? Remember when that photo of Jake and Austin at Borders disappeared and it caused a fuss because it was clear why?

Also, they probably thought that people would assume that someone wandered into the shot. They were also seriously deluded in believing that Reeke was working, and that all these "family vacation" photos were going to finish off the Toothy believers. But that video seals the deal, and it was not taken by Reeke's personal pap.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
destiny said...

Thanks 10:29.

Trolly, again, no one was duped. A lot of the regular posters at OMG have met each other. We're not dumb, we can figure out when somone is a troll or possibly a spy working for pr.

Anonymous said...

I love how the trollys have nothing to counter all the Baby Tile evidence and have to resort to name-calling.

Trolls are dumber than dirt if they think that is going to make BT believers change their minds.

Anonymous said...

LOL Gyllenbabble is deader than a doorknob - they're all over here trolling! Also a coincidence? ~no comments were posted on babble during the time of our WFT BT frenzy.

Anonymous said...

I'm just going through the Paris pics. Jake's a good looking guy, but he didn't look too well there, maybe it also had to do with TDK premiering in the US shortly after. He made some wrong decisions in the past, Reese, POP. But I hope he'll make better ones in the future professionally and personally. Even though he made some mistakes, he's no lunatic to bring a child into the world who he hides from the world. Give him some credit.

Anonymous said...

10:46 AM - stop being paranoid.
No one takes this BT shit seriously.

If something would threat Jake's heterosexuality and have babblers up in arms is the pic where he has an apparent boner looking at Heath.

Anonymous said...

The woman with the baby in Paris is definitely the same woman with Jake in the car. Everything matches. It’s the same person. The baby matches the size of an 8-9 months old baby.

It’s an amazing detective work to come up with so much evidence, not only the Paris pics but all the other pics/sightings/info etc that matches baby tile. We have now enough proof to support Ted’s info is real.

Thanks for the screencap 10:29AM!

Anonymous said...

10:54 The OMGers regularly circle-jerk/stimulate over there being TWO rugrats. They won't admit that here, as most people struggle to believe there is only one.

Come on OMGers, here's your chance to fess up to what you really believe - one or two?? or has it grown to three this week. Jakey must be one virile man.

Anonymous said...

I don't know if I'm totally believing about Baby Tile, but I must say that after looking at the screencaps of the Paris video, Ava definitely knew the blonde with the baby. Ava walked right up to them and touched the baby and the blonde didn't turn her head to look at Ava or pull away. If she didn't know Ava, the woman would have stepped away from a strange child touching her kid.

Anonymous said...

No one has answerd to where was Austin in August in 2008, was he filming? And if so why would he allow his 11 month old child to be dragged overseas with Reeke and not stay at home with him or their extended family.

Because BT is Jake's child?

Anonymous said...

Don't think a kid Ava's age would go up to a complete stranger like that and touch a baby. Play with other kids running around in a park, yes. Touching babies being carried by an adult, no.

Totally agree with 10:46 about the babblers. Noticed that last night. And since trolly posts over there under about a dozen names......

Anonymous said...

I didn't see Ava touch the baby. She was fixing her hair and it looked like she wanted to/touched it, but I don't think she did. Grasping at straws.

Anonymous said...

And if so why would he allow his 11 month old child to be dragged overseas with Reeke and not stay at home with him or their extended family.

Because Jake was working in London and Austin was probably with them for part of that time, when he wasn't working. Jake was in London getting ready for PoP, and took the train to Paris for the mini-vacation. Wasn't that around the same time Reeke stumbled drunk out of that dinner with Jerry? Maybe he arranged the little Reeke family vacation.

I remember there was a lot of talk about whether Austin was in London around that time, and then lo and behold, he all of a sudden showed up at the ESPN thing, as if to prove he wasn't in London. Don't forget ESPN is owned by the same company that owns Disney.

Also, Austin working mostly in tv and not being a star would not get the same housing allowance and catering to his privacy needs the way a studio would do for a star like Jake.

It makes perfect sense for Jake to be the one to take BT with him when they are working.

Anonymous said...

11:16 AM - I think you are more obsessed with the babblers than vice versa.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

If someone needs proof of where Austin was in the summer of 2008, here it is

Wow, thanks Austin fan :)

Anonymous said...

Ava was touching her hair. LMAO. Trolly, we can all see what went on as plain as day, so please stop saying such ridiculous things.

That woman was clearly walking with Reese's nanny--and that is another thing. Seems to me that it would be natural for nannys to walk together like that, and not with their employers.

Anonymous said...

I keep an eye on the babblers, just like they keep an eye on us. Only difference is that I never troll GB. And I think the silence over there says it all.

Anonymous said...

11:16 AM - I think you are more obsessed with the babblers than vice versa.

Really? Is that why babblers post on OMG and WFT2 all the time and no one trolls GB?

Ted said...

Dear Ted:
Are True Blood co-stars Alexander Skarsgård and Stephen Moyer secret lovers Toothy Tile and Grey Goose?
—Kate

Dear Hopeful:
I wish I could tell you that these two hot vamps hook up on the DL—but remember, Toothy has been on the scene way longer than either of these two actors, if you add it up.

Dear Ted:
There are several sightings of Jake Gyllenhaal doing yoga shirtless lately. I wonder if he is really into yoga or if he is just showing off his body. Do you think there is any chance he would also bike shirtless with his cycling partner, Austin, for our viewing pleasure?
—Asana

Dear Sporty Spice:
Been there, done that. Austin and Jake and Matthew McConaughey and Lance Armstrong all have never exactly shyed away from the Naked Cyclist Book Club, membership in which has its very special privileges.

Dear Ted:
Has Toothy Tile ever been associated with Glenn Close?
—Lynn

Dear Det. By Numbers:
Darling, everybody’s been associated with Glenn Close, at some point—that bitch works so much, she's the Kevin Bacon degree of separation around town. Toothy has, too, of course. Not gonna say in what capacity, though!

Dear Ted:
Love your column, dude! Question...how do the gay Hollywood hunks keep their previous BF's and flings and what-have-you quiet? I would think they could go to any gossip rag and get tons of money for spilling the story about their hot night with some hottie. I can't imagine they have everyone sign a non-disclosure, confidentiality agreement before they get busy.
—Practical

Dear Think Again:
Uh, most of gay Hollywood does have non-disclosure forms sitting around next to their condoms, hardly unusual anymore. But, just as a prophylactic can break, so, too, can these zipped lips, but the public's pretty stupid about believing the truth, which these boy-on-boy stars bank on big-time.

The Awful Truth

Anonymous said...

^Notice the order of the questions on Ted's site. The Jake and Austin question is in the middle between the Toothy/Goose and the other Toothy questions.

Anonymous said...

Jake and Glenn Close?

Anonymous said...

Jake and Glenn Close?

She is BT's surrogate mother!

Anonymous said...

Ted said: "everybody’s been associated with Glenn Close...Toothy has, too, of course. Not gonna say in what capacity, though!"

Both were announced together as presenters of last years' Golden Globes. It comes up on imdb as their 'joint venture'.

"Glenn Close, Jake Gyllenhaal to Present 66th Annual Golden Globe Awards"

aceshowbiz (with pic)

google

Anonymous said...

Thanks 11:35 AM #2!

Anonymous said...

"Brothers" opened at no. 9 in the UK. I find it sad that most Jake fans seem more interested in the mostly made up tales by Ted than the actor Jake.

Anonymous said...

Jake needs more fans.

Anonymous said...

Why are you blaming that on us. Whatever happened to all those babblers and Jake is straight fans, not to mention all those other fans who supposedly only care about his career.

Are you the same person who has been telling us for the past couple of years that Reeke wasn't going to affect Jake's carerr? The one who scoffs when posters say they won't support the bearding and see his movies--and says that a few delusional fans is not going to matter.

Anonymous said...

11:37 - And what are YOU doing here at WFT, a Jake gossip blog? Putting together a thesis paper on Jake's acting and how it affects nuclear physics?

Anonymous said...

Are you the same person who has been telling us for the past couple of years that Reeke wasn't going to affect Jake's carerr?

No, I knew from the start she'll hurt his career. Good thing he dumped her ass.

Anonymous said...

Jake would have more fans if he'd stayed true to his self and not run everyone off by Reeking. Dropping her right when Brothers opened was too late to change things.

Anonymous said...

most Jake fans seem more interested in the mostly made up tales by Ted than the actor Jake

^ The site is called Waiting for Toothy, not Waiting for Oscar

Anonymous said...

11:45 #2, good one! Oscar...lol

Jake said...

I'm waiting for Oscarmayer's weiner.

Anonymous said...

11:27: From looking at the stills, Ava is not touching the the nanny's . At first it looked like she was touching the hand of the baby, but in the stills posted, the baby's hands are upright not down. Thanks for posting the caps.

It look like the video was taken after Jake picked her up, she seemed giddy and ran up to catch up with her nanny who was walking next to the woman. She did reach out to the woman and baby but it doesn't actually look like she touched the baby and may have just brushed the woman's elbow. Curiosity? Anyway you can see from the pics on IHJ the nanny, Ava and Deacon are out of the frame, walked ahead of them and Jake and Reese are in the frame. I also see that the BG has dissapeared. I think that they would have walked in a different direction not with the nanny. The blonde didn't flinch because neither she nor the baby were touched. It looked like that in the video, but the caps show a different picture.

11:28: Silence on GB? Why would they be discussing this over there? There is "silence" on WDW because they wouldn't discuss this there either.

Anyway as you can see there are plenty of deletions here so maybe they aren't silent!

Anonymous said...

The blonde woman didn't flinch because she knew Ava and because Ava touched the baby, not her. But keep spinning.

Anonymous said...

Oscar mayer

Anonymous said...

11:55 had touch sensors installed on that woman, that how they can be so emphatic about it

Anonymous said...

Forgot to add, I think she was excited to see the baby and ran over there, so I'll concede you're right about her being giddy.

There's also just something about Jake's body language when he's taking photos, and I think it is because he's shooting BT.

Anonymous said...

I looked at the stills, Ava didn't touch the baby nor the woman look again. She reaches up and if anything her han appears to maybe brush the womans elbow. The image around that area looks blurred but there is no contact with the baby,

x3 said...

Why did she reached for the woman / baby?

reposting said...

Woman and the baby in Paris

Anonymous said...

Those pictures in Malibu, the kid in the background is not Deacon, different shirt and pants. But he does look like he is sitting next to Reese, she does wear a hat like that. But the kid also looks older than 6 months, and looks bigger than the baby in Paris.

Anonymous said...

The bearding was bad enough but having 3x week pap shots in Just Jared, PopSugar, etc was a Jake visual overkill. Especially considering that most of those foto ops featured bitchface front and center and ended up on IHJ with Jake as a background foliage. The old Jake Walking pics were often enough that he wasn't forgotten but sporadic and unpredictable to make each new one an exciting treat. I honestly think the overexposure and the dullness of all the everyday bearding pics numbed the public to his persona. He wasn't an intriguing elusive actor anymore; he became standard generic material on every middle of the road site and magazine, especially when he let his public image be downgraded into a second class citizen as part of Reese Witheredpoon Inc.

Anonymous said...

What's odd about the Paris blonde woman baby vid and still pics section is....where was Deacon? They're all walking purposefully like they're headed somewhere but Deacon is not in that part of the vid whatsoever.

Anonymous said...

"I looked at the stills, Ava didn't touch the baby"

The stills don't show everything. The frames per second and doing screen shots of them doesn't show the full stream, it's impossible due to the low quality of the vid. Look at the time counter in some of the successive frames, it stays at .30 even though the frame has changed!

Anonymous said...

ITA 12:11. I was scrolling through Jake posts on JJ last night looking for those blonde woman pictures to find a date(someone found them before me) and boy, was it numbing to see those endless Reeke posts, and all the stupid tabloid covers like "Jake moves in" and all the marriage chatter, and the on-again off-gain nonsense in 2007. It was not only dull, it was nauseating. I'd genuinely forgotten how many JJ posts there were.

Anonymous said...

Are we supposed to believe the blond woman with the babe are the nanny with BT????

Difficult to say if Ava touched the baby, what is sure : the woman ignore her. They look perfect strangers for me.

Besides BT isn't supposed to be born in spetember 2007. Those pics are from august 2008 right , the babe seems younger.

Anonymous said...

"Besides BT isn't supposed to be born in spetember 2007."

sorry I meant "is supposed to be born in september 2007"

Anonymous said...

Maybe that blonde woman is the surrogate mother not the nanny? The kid seems to have blonde hair.

Anonymous said...

Besides BT is supposed to be born in september 2007

Post that Dear Ted letter.

Anonymous said...

Maybe that blonde woman is the surrogate mother not the nanny? The kid seems to have blonde hair.

If she's the mother, maybe Jake wanted the child to have a mother in its life too?

Anonymous said...

I've been checking the pics, the pretty blonde lady (nanny, mother?) is tanned in the L.A. pics, but she's pale in the Paris pics, maybe because she was in London for a longer period of time when Jake was shooting PoP?

Anonymous said...

If she's the mother, maybe Jake wanted the child to have a mother in its life too?

What did he say in that interview (GQ?) about the most important thing for a man was to find the right mother for his child....some crap like that.

Anonymous said...

Now thinking about it, he left the baby alone for a longer period of time oftentimes with the nanny supposedly. You usually don't leave your kid alone for a longer period of time unless it's with another parent.

Anonymous said...

What did he say in that interview (GQ?) about the most important thing for a man was to find the right mother for his child....some crap like that.

Exactly. Maybe he found her? She lives a good life with him, takes good care of his baby and he can sleep with whomever, whenever he wants. Would be a nice deal.

Anonymous said...

he left the baby alone for a longer period of time

Like when?

Atticus said...

Whew am I glad i got fixed.

Anonymous said...

The Baby Tile blind item says both the woman who provided the egg and the woman who carried the baby were donors. According to Ted the surrogate mother is not involved in the kids' life. Toothy and Goose are raising the baby themselves as Ted said in a recent bitch-back. If the baby in Paris is BT, then the blonde woman is a nanny or Jake's assistant.

this is the original blind item:

Stork Stirrings

Since it's Blind Friday, thought I'd also give you the latest on Toothy Tile. Hear he's not really planning on adopting a kiddo, as I previously broke a few weeks ago. Nope. I was—gasp!—wrong.

Turns out T2, so blab our mutual amigos, plans on swirling up his love juice, right alongside his boyfriend's procreating protein, ya know, putting it in some kinda beaker or toaster, or something, and mixing it around with a donor's eggs, then putting the results into yet another donor to carry the resulting embryo.

The plan is, Boyfriend Tile will then, legally (and far, far away from pokin' press types like yours truly) be listed as papa—when, in fact, our beloved Tooth just may be the correct daddio.

Oh, the lengths scaredy-cat cats will go to in order to cover up their preferred meowing ways. So damn silly. Why the hell can't the dudes be more like roarin' hons such as Melissa Etheridge and Tammy Lynn Michaels, spouses and partners who are proud of whom they purr 'n' poke at?

Anonymous said...

She lives a good life with him, takes good care of his baby and he can sleep with whomever, whenever he wants. Would be a nice deal.

Except for when she wants a romance of her own. Try explaining that situation to a date!

Anonymous said...

^^ I think she could very well be the mother.

I don't think Austin is much involved anymore, since I think they broke up as Ted alluded that GG wised up finally and moved on. This is Jake's baby anyway.

Anonymous said...

Except for when she wants a romance of her own. Try explaining that situation to a date!

I'd compare her situation with Jackman's wife or Travolta's or Cruise's etc...

BT's mother on a date said...

Try explaining that situation to a date!

Have you ever heard of Ted Casablanca?

Anonymous said...

Why is it so hard to believe BT has two dads and no mother? They are a gay couple raising a kid together.

BT's mother's date said...

Twofer Tiley who?

BT's mother's date said...

*runs like hell*

Anonymous said...

"Why is it so hard to believe BT has two dads and no mother? They are a gay couple raising a kid together."

Because Ted said Austin "wised up" because he was tired being the "little Goose on the side". It's implyied he said goodbye.

Anonymous said...

It was mentioned that the blonde had fake breasts, but maybe they were just full of milk from nursing?

Anonymous said...

The spinning is unbelievable. Ted is repeating almost every day that Jake and Austin are still together. Who said the baby is Jake's? Ted said both Toothy and Goose are raising the kid together and they are a family as recent as last week!


January 9, 2010

Dear Ted:
Is there a second Baby Tile in the Tile-Goose family?
—Little Sibling

Dear Bundle of Joy:
Their family is constantly expanding, in many ways.


January 16, 2010

Dear Ted:
Do Toothy and Gray Goose's close circle of family and friends know about Baby Tile?
—Beth

Dear Family Fun:
Duh!


January 22 2010

Dear Ted:
I hope all is well. My doggy sends a friendly "woof" to your kids! I have two questions. Not sure if this has already been asked, but first question is: Do Toothy and Grey Goose actively raise Baby Tile, or was this a "sire" situation? (As in Toothy, uh, provided elements to help make the baby for a friend or family member who is raising the baby). Second, of all the closeted Blind Vices you've reported over the years, which one is most likely to come out?
—Sarah

Dear Tough Questions:
(a) Active; (b) My guess? Crotch Uh-Lastic.

Anonymous said...

No, IMO it implies he said how he felt and laid out some ground rules. Not leave. Besides, since then Ted has stated TT and GG are still together.

Anonymous said...

"Because Ted said Austin "wised up" because he was tired being the "little Goose on the side". It's implyied he said goodbye."

Ted said that in August in the middle of the Reeking. Did you read everything Ted said after that? He is constantly mentioning them as being still together and a family.

Anonymous said...

1:00 PM, that's contradictive, because he implyied they broke up in an earlier post. Maybe Austin pays visits out of responsibility (cause he was involved in the beginning), but the main responsible is Jake, since I think he's the bio daddy.

prairiegirl said...

I totally agree 12:31 # 1. When I went back to look at some of these pictures, re-living all of that stuff was gagging.

I don't think it's imperative that baby T needed to be holding out his hand to High-5 Ava, lol. I haven't looked at the stills but it's really irrelevant if Ava threw up an airball.

It's very visible to me that Ava ran up and reached up to touch that baby. And like I said, I can see her retracting her hand pretty quickly as if remembering that she's probably not supposed to be acting like she knows them.

Also, as for BT being in a papoose thing and not a stroller, it seems pretty smart to me since we clearly cannot see the child's face in the video because he/she is facing the nanny's body. Now how smart it was to take the baby out for this photo op I'm not so sure. But you know, maybe they thought they could get away with it as long as the nanny kept her distance.

This exposure was probably something they didn't count on. And since that stroller picture wasn't part of the ones on IHJ in that whole set, it could be that they weren't counting on that picture getting taken either.

Anonymous said...

"1:00 PM, that's contradictive, because he implyied they broke up in an earlier post. Maybe Austin pays visits out of responsibility (cause he was involved in the beginning), but the main responsible is Jake, since I think he's the bio daddy."

That is your personal opinion but don't quote Ted to back up your argument because Ted never said that.

prairiegirl said...

Ted has clearly indicated that Toothy & GG are still together.

And since I'm from OMG, I will answer 11:04 and speak for myself, anyways. I believe there are probably 2 BT's. I would have to go back and find Ted's hints at there being 2, though. But I'm open to there being 2.

Anonymous said...

So the blonde is the nanny and assistant, since she's driving the car. How convenient!

Anonymous said...

prairiegirl - maybe one is Jake's biological child and the other Austin's? Can you post what Ted said?

Anonymous said...

I just pray the mother isn't Octomom and Jaustin have 8 babies.

Anonymous said...

I still think the mother is the blonde woman.

prairiegirl said...

lol, 1:11 # 2

1:11 # 1, I don't have anything right off hand because I don't keep anything, unfortunately.
:-(

But I remember one answer by Ted that hinted at another one being in the fold.

Anonymous said...

The clues to a second baby tile started when Ted had hints around Toothy to Naomi Watts and Jennifer Garner's second babies. For example these two letters:

August 29, 2008

Bitch-Back! Readers Have a Baby Tile Freak-Out

Dear Ted:
Ted, I love your wit, and the new retina-burning format is starting to grow on me. You said there's a Baby Tile—is there another one on the way? Is it Ben Affleck?
—Scutten

Dear Baby Q:
Such the good guess, babes, so right in so many brunet directions, alas, it's the wrong two-timing type

September 4, 2008

Dear Ted:
I just had an epiphany...is Toothy Tile Liev Schreiber? Baby on the way, same age as Affleck. Come on, it's killing me not to know.
—Gillian

Dear Too Close for Toothy's Comfort:
Not exactly. Actually, not at all. But L and the real Tooth do have so much in common, true.


Until he finally hinted to it in a more explicit way in this recent letter:

January 9, 2010

Dear Ted:
Is there a second Baby Tile in the Tile-Goose family?
—Little Sibling

Dear Bundle of Joy:
Their family is constantly expanding, in many ways.

Anonymous said...

Dear Ted:
Is there a second Baby Tile in the Tile-Goose family?
—Little Sibling

Dear Bundle of Joy:
Their family is constantly expanding, in many ways.


^^Little Sibling, Bundle of Joy,
constantly expanding. I'd say that hints at a #2.

prairiegirl said...

You guys are astounding. I'm terrible at archiving. I may have to step it up, though. Clearly I'm slacking when compared to you all!! I feel like a tag a long tick, lol.

Atticus said...

Tick??

*runs*

Seagull said...

Supposedly BT was born in October of 2008.

I e-mailed Ted all of this using this blog as reference, I'll see what he does with it.

Back in 2008 when I saw the stroller being unpacked and the blonde in the pic on IHJ, I sent him an e-mail as well. Last year when I was lurking on GB, they posted this video and I recognized that it was from the same set of pics. I asked Ted if he thought that women was part of their entourage.

No answer either time.

Anonymous said...

Well if Jake is reading WFT right now he's either laughing or crying.

Anonymous said...

"Supposedly BT was born in October of 2008."

BT was born in October 2007.

Anonymous said...

Consensus:

Jake is gay, still dating Austin, BT exists, has a pretty little nanny and there is possibly another baby on the way or born.

Anonymous said...

Jake is gay, still dating Austin, BT exists, has a pretty little nanny and there is possibly another baby on the way or born.

If you have 1 or 2 kids together can you still say you're "dating" ??!

Anonymous said...

^^Even the nanny is a tiny blonde. Jesus Jake! LOL.

I'm not saying he's straight, so don't kill me, all I'm saying is he seems to like tiny blonde women.

Anonymous said...

If you have 1 or 2 kids together can you still say you're "dating" ??!

How would you describe it?

prairiegirl said...

I think going by the ring that Jake was spotted wearing when he was on the crutches, that the guys maybe had an unofficial service or maybe just an agreement/commitment between themselves.

Anonymous said...

Jake and Austin are partners and they have a family together.

Anonymous said...

Living together, partners, anything but dating, lol

Anonymous said...

"How would you describe it?"

husbands.

Anonymous said...

It's also possible that they got married in California when gay marriages were legal and had the confidential marriage done.

Anonymous said...

^The matching wedding rings make me think they definitely got married.

Anonymous said...

Confidential Marriage: Parties to the marriage must be living together, ceremony must take place in the County where the marriage license was issued, no witnesses are required, and the marriage record is only available to the named parties on the document.

California Confidential Marriage

Anonymous said...

he seems to like tiny blonde women.

They make him look and feel big, butch and manly.

Anonymous said...

Ryan G. and Michelle posing for pics

The way they laugh reminds me of the way Jake and Heath used to laugh during BBM promo. It makes me sad. :(

But R & M are cute together. She was never so happy with Heath. Sometimes I wish they never hooked up, but then there wouln't be little M.

Anonymous said...

The way his publicist was always quick to deny the wedding rumors, but nothing else, also makes me think he got married.

Anonymous said...

Don't attack me for saying this, but maybe Heath would still be alive if he was with Jake instead of Michelle. Heath seemed so happy with Jake and Jake with him. Life is so unfair. Sigh. :(

Anonymous said...

They make him look and feel big, butch and manly.

Probably. ;)

Anonymous said...

Also that pic of Austin with a man's legs around his neck. Go ahead and LOL but IMO there's something "wedding-like" or celebratory about it. It just doesn't look like a "casual Friday night having fun with the gang" pic.

Anonymous said...

^I totally agree with you!

Anonymous said...

Maybe it was a wild bachelor party. ;)

Don't think Ted will say anything about all of this, it would be too close to outing Jake, and he couldn't do it unless he knew 100% that was BT.

Anonymous said...

I also think that another hint that Jake has a kid could be when in his latest interviews he talked so much about his father and his relationship with his father when he was a kid. I think it was a reflection of his own role as a father in the present. This is why he was constantly mentioning the father-son relationships.

«Oldest ‹Older   801 – 1000 of 2726   Newer› Newest»