Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Last year, I made a big deal about Ricky Martin’s coming out.
Revisiting the blog piece today, I realize I was somehow evoking the spirit of the It Gets Better Project. And while I continue extremely critical of this campaign (for many reasons, not the least are its ageist and classist narratives), I do believe the visualization of imagined possibility is important. For the young boy who, like myself in my early teen years, finds himself living in rural México, seeing a public figure with pop culture prominence spanning a few decades might help in the process of imagining and/or visualizing what being a Brown man who loves other men might look like.
Later in the year, I wrote a piece titled “How Ricky Martin is Changing the Face of Latino Fatherhood,” based on Ricky and his two sons' (Valentino and Matteo) appearance on the cover of People En Español’s father’s day issue. Given People En Español’s circulation, the image of an openly gay Latino father and his children, would be in countless Latina/o supermarkets and living rooms. Yet again, the image of Ricky’s queer Latinidad was helping us imagine a more expansive Latinidad that includes more of us.
With Ricky’s reemergence into the public light, we had the opportunity to see a queer Latino strike down racist stereotypes about inherent homophobia in our communities. Perhaps the best example was on The View when Ricky responded to Joy Behar’s suggestion that his culture kept him from coming out. In a moment that made him even more beautiful in my eyes, Ricky refuses to take the bait and simply states that people all over the world are struggling with their sexuality. (Thank you!)
This morning, Ricky's new album "Música + Alma + Sexo" hit stores and I typed faster than my queer fingers could to download it on iTunes. Refusing to shy away from the "sex" in sexuality by daring to have the word "Sexo" in the title of the album, I am excited to see where Ricky takes us as an openly queer historically sensual performer.
Watching two brown men in an affectionate embrace in the “Lo Mejor De Mi Vida Eres Tú” video, I’m pretty darn sure Ricky will continue to matter to me… and maybe a few other boys.
Source: Today, Ricky Martin matters more than ever by Lorenzo Herrera y Lozano
Saturday, 5 March 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2,198 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 801 – 1000 of 2198 Newer› Newest»No one has any idea if Austin Nichols was watching TV or if he was physically in LA at the Academy Awards. What's more intriguing is that he wanted people to think he was there.
LOL. He was so OBVIOUSLY joking around with his tweets - there is no intrigue at all and he wasn't trying to get anyone to actually think he was in LA. Only the truly gullible would be unable to see he was making a joke of the whole thing.
Ted writes some of the questions, especially, when he knows his OMG fans will be looking out for the subtle clues and hints.
Here we go again. Of course, you know that because Ted told you, right? You are really trying too hard to discredit Ted. We are here because of him. But, you truly have some vested interested in calling him a liar and a loon. Come to think of it, you think anyone's a loon who doesn't agree with you. Sticks and stones....
What's more intriguing is that he wanted people to think he was there.
What is intriguing about an actor watching and tweeting about Oscars?????????????????????
Vanity Fair party - the woman we saw near Jake was Austin in disguise! Good job, Austin! :)
What's more intriguing is that he wanted people to think he was there.
LOL. All his tweets are so tongue-in-cheek, no-one would assume he was there.
LOL. He was so OBVIOUSLY joking around with his tweets -
Oh, you mean because YOU say it's obvious. What makes you so credible? The only thing obvious is your audacity and relentless ridiculing of anyone who doesn't agree with you. You have no idea where Austin was and you definitely have no ability to read his mind. Having an opinion is one thing, disparaging anyone else's point of view, makes one wonder about your true reason for being here. People can think for themselves. They don't need your constant, "I know everything so everyone else can just shut up," attitude.
You are really trying too hard to discredit Ted. We are here because of him.
Loon, speak for yourself.
10:29 AM - why and how on Earth would Austin get an invitation to attend Oscars? WTF are you talking about?
Yes trolly, we know you think you know every f*cking thing in the world that has to do with Jake, Austin and their beards.
Why you think we should believe you is another matter.
Austin went as "Oscar". No need for a wig this time, just gold paint.
What is intriguing about an actor watching and tweeting about Oscars?????????????????????
If you were paying attention, Austin started tweeting that afternoon and then stopped about 15minutes after Jake gave out the award for Live Action Short and Short Film Documentary. What's intriguing is how he didn't continue tweeting the rest of the night. The most important awards were yet to come. Yet, once Jake's stint was over, Austin stops tweeting.
(((10:33am)))
Calm down babe.
Loon, speak for yourself.
Ah, the persuasive name calling tactic. That's always a cogent arugment.
Yet, once Jake's stint was over, Austin stops tweeting.
So what? What are you suggesting?
Ah, the persuasive name calling tactic.
LOL! I'm sure you're not pure as the driven snow. Don't cry, it's just the internet.
10:36 And that was on purpose yet again. He must be laughing his ass off knowing that there are fangirls out there thinking he is giving shoutouts.
Oh well I guess that's more interesting than acting on that shitty show.
10:29 AM - why and how on Earth would Austin get an invitation to attend Oscars? WTF are you talking about?
Just like with other people who attend Oscar parties and events, Austin knows someone who invited him. I believe the person's name is Jake Gyllenhaal. In less cautious days, someone snapped a picture from 2005 of Austin and his former beard Claire Oswalt next to Jake at the Vanity Fair Party. That's how it works.
Yet, once Jake's stint was over, Austin stops tweeting.
Not even a nice try :)
10:38, 10:36 Is suggesting he is pulling some fangirls chains.
He lurks/lurked on OMG. SK showed some fellow jaustaloons an ISP address from NC from some hotel rught around the time zaustin started on that show. The hotel appeard in the short film he did with Hillary and she thinks he was staying there at the time.
So now he is using tweets to make them even more looney, if that's possible
Just like with other people who attend Oscar parties and events, Austin knows someone who invited him. I believe the person's name is Jake Gyllenhaal.
Why would Jake invite Austin? So he could ignore him in public?
Not even a nice try :)
Oh, I think it's a very nice try and obviously you do too or you wouldn't have responded with your smiley snark.
Why would Jake invite Austin? So he could ignore him in public?
Like other couples who attend awards, so they could be together. The after parties are ultra private and those invited inside know what is acceptable to capture on film and what isn't.
In less cautious days, someone snapped a picture from 2005 of Austin and his former beard Claire Oswalt next to Jake at the Vanity Fair Party. That's how it works.
No it isn't. Being at an industry/sponsors pre or post party is very different to being at the Oscars, which is where you claim Austin was. Even Z listers go to those parties to get free gifts!
"Why would Jake invite Austin? So he could ignore him in public?"
LOL :smiley snark:
LOL! I'm sure you're not pure as the driven snow. Don't cry, it's just the internet.
Another persuasive argument. You're really on a roll, aren't you. Your incoherency is showing.
The big parties that Jake was likely to attend are very exclusive, if you think any no-name person can wander in off the street, think again.
And even Z listers know the name of the game, they're not going to spill anything or look uncool by doing something as stupid as taking pictures.
Well, most of them. I remember that column from a guy who thought he was going to possibly hook up with Austin, only to see him leave the party with Jake.
Oops, not a column but a post on his blog.
Sorry 10:47 AM but nice try is something that doesn't insult everyone's intelligence.
BT believers: Jake, Austin and PR are faking tweets and sightings for years because they want people to believe that Jake and Austin aren't together and aren't even spending lot of time in the same city.
But at the same time Jake and Austin decided to attend Oscars together.
That makes sense? Of course not, but BT believers don't give a shit.
No it isn't. Being at an industry/sponsors pre or post party is very different to being at the Oscars, which is where you claim Austin was.
No, I did not claim Austin was physically standing next to Jake at the Samuel Goldwyn Theater in Beverly Hills. Don't be absurd. I asserted that it's quite possible he was with Jake that night in LA. Where exactly he was, is irrelevant. You said he was at home in NC, tweeting because he had nothing better to do.
The best 'evidence' that the jaustaloons have come up with that 'proves' Austin was at the AA's was that he stopped tweeting at around the time Jake finished his presenting duties.
No wonder you are called LOONS.
I agree Destiny. I remember that blog entry. The guy was very attracted to this guy sitting across the table and then Jake showed up and Austin and Jake disappeared TOGETHER. The guy was left hanging, thinking he had a chance with Austin.
And even Z listers know the name of the game, they're not going to spill anything or look uncool by doing something as stupid as taking pictures.
Please make up your mind: are you claiming that Austin attended the Oscars or that he attended post Oscar party?
BTW, there are photos from post Oscar parties posted on twitter, facebook, tons of sites. No one would care about Jake or Austin, much less would anyone care about not taking picture of Jake and Austin. Why would they?
Please make up your mind: are you claiming that Austin attended the Oscars or that he attended post Oscar party?
I've been reading this discussion thread about Austin tweeting the night of the Oscars, no one asserted that he attended the Oscars with Jake.
No, I did not claim Austin was physically standing next to Jake at the Samuel Goldwyn Theater in Beverly Hills.
You already forgot "once Jake's stint was over, Austin stops tweeting"? Unfuckingbelievable.
Jake showed up and Austin and Jake disappeared TOGETHER.
OOOOOOOhhhh "TOGETHER". How saucy, especially in all caps.
no one asserted that he attended the Oscars with Jake
Really? Could you please explain this: "Austin started tweeting that afternoon and then stopped about 15minutes after Jake gave out the award".
And this: "Just like with other people who attend Oscar parties and events, Austin knows someone who invited him. I believe the person's name is Jake Gyllenhaal."
No one would care about Jake or Austin
If no one would care, why do the guys make sure no one gets photos of them together unless they arrange the photo op like late last May after Prince of Persia opened? Seems pretty clear to me that insiders in Hollywood know that they are not to cross that line at industry events. Same with other celebs and their private hookups.
Really? Could you please explain this: "Austin started tweeting that afternoon and then stopped about 15minutes after Jake gave out the award".
Yeah, I can explain it. YOU can't read.
LOL! Exactly, 11:17. You never wrote that Austin was physically with Jake inside the theatre.
Well, most of them. I remember that column from a guy who thought he was going to possibly hook up with Austin, only to see him leave the party with Jake.
And how many years ago was this? And what relevance does it have to 2011?
Exactly, 11:17. You never wrote that Austin was physically with Jake inside the theatre.
So? What difference does it make? Whether someone is saying he was in the theater or just at the parties or whatever? The point is, Austin was joking around with his tweets and the people who desperately want to believe he was running around in plain sight at parties with Jake can't see that. On the one hand, you claim they go to great lengths to hide their relationship and on the other hand you claim they are attending Oscar parties together. Please.
It's comedy gold to watch the jaustaloons back peddle when called out on their bullshit.
You never wrote that Austin was physically with Jake inside the theatre.
Your bullshiting and spinning is beyond pathetic. WTF is wrong with you?
No one has any idea if Austin Nichols was watching TV or if he was physically in LA at the Academy Awards. What's more intriguing is that he wanted people to think he was there.
^10:15am #1 jaustaloon.
Well, where's the quote that indicates the poster was placing Austin in the theatre with Jake? I dont' see it. Do you have x-ray vision or something, besides your all knowing ways? The problem is you jump to conclusions because you're ready to go after anyone who has a different opinion. You have a right to your point of view but so do others.
Here comes the name calling again. That poster must have hit on something that is making the trolls very uncomfortable. Ha! So Austin could have been with Jake that night and it's killing them. Too funny.
So Austin could have been with Jake that night and it's killing them. Too funny.
Too bad stupid theories like "Austin could have been with Jake that night" aren't funny at all.
Well, where's the quote that indicates the poster was placing Austin in the theatre with Jake? I dont' see it.
Still playing stupid? Let me help you:
- No one has any idea if Austin Nichols was watching TV or if he was physically in LA at the Academy Awards.
- Austin started tweeting that afternoon and then stopped about 15minutes after Jake gave out the award
- Just like with other people who attend Oscar parties and events, Austin knows someone who invited him. I believe the person's name is Jake Gyllenhaal.
That poster must have hit on something that is making the trolls very uncomfortable. Ha! So Austin could have been with Jake that night and it's killing them. Too funny.
LOL, so if you are called a jaustaloon, then it means Austin was at the Oscars with Jake? Great logic!
The jaustaloons really are the new babblers!
Here comes the name calling again. That poster must have hit on something that is making the trolls very uncomfortable.
Please save that shit for OMG.
As you know, there is a troll and there are WFT2 posters who agree with troll on this: Jake and Austin broke up long time ago and there is no BT.
Jake cant risk being seen with Austin because he cant hide the dreamy glow that comes over him when he is with the man he loves. Their chemistry leaps off the page.
*****
((Some others just can't fathom the idea of life without a blissful LOVE relationship between Jake and Austin.))
^^ See the first post above!
What I told ya..Some others just can't fathom the idea of life without a blissful LOVE relationship between Jake and Austin.
Goodness, Not even realizing that relationships don't always last.
I Jake or Austin (IS) gay, they both could have been with many othem men since 2007 til now.
But Jake's been with other females and Sophia's not letting Austin go or get anywhere close to Jake, you can bet on that.
Besides, Jake don't need Austin, Nothings wrong with being freinds. The benefits are over now, if there were any.
- No one has any idea if Austin Nichols was watching TV or if he was physically in LA at the Academy Awards.
- Austin started tweeting that afternoon and then stopped about 15minutes after Jake gave out the award
- Just like with other people who attend Oscar parties and events, Austin knows someone who invited him. I believe the person's name is Jake Gyllenhaal.
How anyone can read those tweets and not see them as a joke is unbelievable.
And you still can't answer a very simple question: If they go to such great lengths to conceal their relationship the way OMGers keep insisting that they do (with fake tweets to throw people off track, etc.) why would they then attend Oscar parties together in plain sight? They wouldn't - and don't give us that crap that none of the people in attendance would give them away - that kind of stuff would definitely get out. There are all kinds of pictures out there and you wouldn't have to be aiming to take a picture of them specifically. Why is it that all the pics that you claim are Austin (at the Farmers Market, another one from a previous Oscars) never show his entire face? Just a random unidentifiable body part.
It's not the saying you think J&A broke up a long time ago that gets the label "name calling" and you know it. It's using words like "loon" "jaustaloon" and "panties damp" that is name-calling.
I agree that if someone is incapable of making an argument without resorting to using words like that, then they are uncomfortable, upset, or don't think they have a good argument, so they fling out words they think will discredit the poster, instead of trying to discredit the thought.
I have no idea whether Austin was in LA or NC for the Oscars. My point was that the absence of photos doesn't mean a thing when it comes to closeted gay actors and their boyfriends. The only ones taking pictures at those industry parties are industry-approved photographers who know the deal, or know that someone else is calling the shots as to what gets released and what doesn't. Anyone who has been paying attention to how pr and HW works can see that.
Destiny,
you are unbelievable.
You are one of those who post insane J&A theories, ignore all logic and sense, ignore direct questions and don't care about giving any reasonable arguments.
WTF2 posters are doing their best to post arguments and info which supports and explains their opinions, but you ignore all that and you address only troll posts (name calling).
Why do you keep treating WFT2 posters like idiots?
Go away Destiny and stop pretending you know anything because you don't.
^^^^ WFT2 posters
Ha! So Austin could have been with Jake that night and it's killing them. Too funny.
Austin could have been in Texas on a Ranch feeding wild WartHogs.
He could have been at home desigining a new matching pant ensamble for Ellen Degeneres.
He could have been at home on the Toilet reading EW because he was not nominated for any award that season, AND, not invited to any of the Awards Partys.
Who gives a Rats A**?
If they are gonna hide their relationship at all cost, then why on earth would they then attend the lavish A list Partys together, or meet up there as a couple?
Makes no Sense. Get it together and Start making some kind of sense to your far reaching theories.
The only ones taking pictures at those industry parties are industry-approved photographers who know the deal, or know that someone else is calling the shots as to what gets released and what doesn't.
That's bullshit. Industry-approved photographers and photo agencies are not the same as paparazzi agencies and celebrities with IQ 50 and higher don't attend such parties with people they don't want to be seen with in public.
So Austin could have been with Jake that night and it's killing them.
The idea that Waiting For Toothy 2 posters what have a problem with Jake and Austin being together is too stupid for words.
Industry-approved photographers and photo agencies are not the same as paparazzi agencies and celebrities with IQ 50 and higher don't attend such parties with people they don't want to be seen with in public.
Exactly.
My point was that the absence of photos doesn't mean a thing when it comes to closeted gay actors and their boyfriends
See above. It's not a matter of "absence of photographs" - it's just plain old common sense, without all the conspiracy theory stuff thrown in to rationalize and explain away the obvious.
Actually my opinions on a lot of things differ considerably from other people who post on OMG when it comes to Jake and Austin, but I know you don't give a rat's ass about that. You're just angry that you can't bully people into changing their minds.
And if you think I'm going to go away, the laugh's on you.
have a problem with Jake and Austin being together is too stupid for words.
Wow. How many times does this have to be explained. It's not about "having a problem" with anything - it's about using your brain and using logic.
Actually my opinions on a lot of things differ considerably from other people who post on OMG when it comes to Jake and Austin, but I know you don't give a rat's ass about that.
what opinion is that? We read and comment your posts, we can't read your mind.
1:21 PM - one more time:
"So Austin could have been with Jake that night and it's killing them." - poster is suggesting that the very thought of Jake and Austin being together is a big problem for WFT2.
"The idea that Waiting For Toothy 2 posters what have a problem with Jake and Austin being together is too stupid for words." = Only an idiot could suggest that people who believe that Jake and Austin were a couple could have a problem with them being together.
March 17, 2011 1:17 PM
You obviously haven't read my posts, because I have said plenty here. For starters, I've said that I'm not 100% convinced there is a BT, but I'm about 90% there. And I don't believe there is more than one.
I've also said that I think Jake is so deep in the closet that it is not likely he is taking Austin to industry events anymore, although I think plenty of people in the closet do, and I don't think there would be pictures if he did.
You obviously haven't read my posts, because I have said plenty here.
I did read your posts, but you often choose to ignore facts, logic and common sense so it is hard to understand your position.
Jack, it is so obvious what is going on. Every time there is an extended period of time when you can't place where Jake and Austin supposedly are you have a meltdown.
No sign of either of them since Saturday.
And no, your or some anon's insistence that Jake is in LA is not evidence.
That will change, I'm betting Austin will turn up in Puerto Rico this weekend, and this weekend we'll magically get pictures of Jake in LA, and then everyone will go "see, Jake was in LA all week, and Austin was with Sophia all week".
Ain't going to work.
I'm betting Austin will turn up in Puerto Rico this weekend, and this weekend we'll magically get pictures of Jake in LA, and then everyone will go "see, Jake was in LA all week, and Austin was with Sophia all week".
Ain't going to work.
^^^
I'm not this Jack person you speak about, but, What are you talking about? Austin in PR w/ Sophia, Jake in LA? What?
According to the OTH forums, the "girls" of OTH will be flying to PR tomorrow for filming, and word is that Austin will tag along with Sophia just for the weekend, even though he is not filming and apparently not staying the whole time the OTH crew is there. Even the posters on the forum think this is a bit odd, which really tells you something.
I suspect Jake will show up in LA to do SC promotion; someone posted a tweet about someone who couldn't go to LA to interview Jake at the end of this week.
Jack, it is so obvious what is going on. Every time there is an extended period of time when you can't place where Jake and Austin supposedly are you have a meltdown. No sign of either of them since Saturday.
Destiny, it is obvious that you love playing stupid. Jack is not the only one who posts here and believes that Jake and Austin are history. You know that, but you continue to pretend.
OMG posters are having a meltdown - no one in the right mind would suggest that Jake and Austin attending Oscars bullshit.
And no one in the right mind would suggest that "no sign of either of them since Saturday" means that Austin and Jake are somewhere together.
Austin will tag along with Sophia just for the weekend, even though he is not filming.
It tell us that Austin prefers to spend his time with Sophia - why should he care about Jake and kids? LOL
I'm betting Austin will turn up in Puerto Rico this weekend, and this weekend we'll magically get pictures of Jake in LA, and then everyone will go "see, Jake was in LA all week, and Austin was with Sophia all week".
Are you saying that Austin doesn't film OTH on the East coast? Sorry, there is no lie so big to undo that FACT.
Austin has no more filming left; you can check the OTH forums. Some people had a few scenes to shoot early this week, then tomorrow Sophia, Shantel and a few other actresses are heading to PR.
Austin hasn't worked on OTH since early last week.
And don't play dumb, you know perfectly well people only spend time with their beards to make a point, not because they have nothing else to do.
I can think of plenty of thinks for Austin to do, starting with trying to find new work. Or visiting his family in Austin.
people only spend time with their beards to make a point
Destiny,
you need to stop playing dumb - we didn't forget about Austin traveling with Sophia (Europe, she was filming), spending holidays with Sophia, Sophia spending time with Austin's family in Austin, TX, Austin calling Sophia "my woman", ...
Austin hasn't worked on OTH since early last week.
The point is that Austin was filming for MONTHS and that they are still filming OTH.
Austin hasn't worked on OTH since early last week.
Austin and Sophia were in Wilmington, NC last weekend, tweets are posted here.
Poor troll. Her entire argument that Jake and Austin are no longer together was wiped out by a few words from Ted. No wonder they have been in near melt down the past few days.
What the heck is 4:24PM talking about? Anyone who doubts that J&A are a couple is a troll now? Who decided that?
Oh, and I wouldn't be so quick to throw out the "a few words from Ted" argument - he said a few words the other day that have OMGers pissed off, confused and in denial. First he said Toothy was "active" in BTs life, now the kid is apparently off living somewhere "non-vicey." LOL.
Her entire argument that Jake and Austin are no longer together was wiped out by a few words from Ted.
I really, really hope you are joking.
BTW, which words were that? When Ted said that someone else is raising BT? Or when Ted said that Jake and Austine are still friends?
Anyone who doubts that J&A are a couple is a troll now? Who decided that?
On OMG everyone who doesn't believe that J&A are a couple is a troll for the last year or longer.
OMG posters are saying the same shit here - they have no arguments, nothing to support their opinion, so that is the best they can do.
The pretty Michlelle Monaghan on the cover of C:
http://justjared.buzznet.com/2011/03/17/michelle-monaghan-covers-c-magazine-april-2011/
So they are friends, big shit. There is a diff between being friends and fucking.
BTW, Ausin and Sophia re in DC today to meet the President then off to PR.
Austin will return to NC according to oth posters on Monday, I guess because they will be actually sttart filming and he isn't in the scenes so i guess he wouldn't have anything to do.
The pretty Michlelle Monaghan on the cover of C
Real nice cover :)
So they are friends, big shit.
Yes, Austin and Sophia are friends and Austin obviously likes spending time with her. But that also means that Austin is spending time with Sophia when he could be with Jake - another indication that Jake and Austin aren't together.
Austin is with Sophia because they work together and she is bearding for him. They are long time friends too. Lovers on screen only.
7:03 PM - only Austin Nichols is suggesting that they are a real couple. The point is that one of the reasons Austin is spending a lot of time with her, including holidays, is because he and Jake are history.
Very pretty cover of Michelle Monaghan - love the dress, the pretty spring green color. :)
he said a few words the other day that have OMGers pissed off, confused and in denial. First he said Toothy was "active" in BTs life, now the kid is apparently off living somewhere "non-vicey." LOL.
^^^^ And don't forget having sex with nasty WOMEN! aghhhhh
LOL
Ted keeps confusing them. I think he can't keep up with the story he made up, it's obvious.
I see you're still beating yourself off Jack.
And don't forget having sex with nasty WOMEN!
Learn to read, Ted didn't say anything about it for a long, long time.
Learn to read, Ted didn't say anything about it for a long, long time
You sound so threatened by Jake even spending one day with a vag.
Threatened by Ted's gossip????????? LMAO!!!
4:13 AM - you are projecting.
D.C. Is hilarious. Just saw this dude at a closed Starbucks. http://twitpic.com/4ajn5s
6 hours ago
k_stewasms: I'm gonna watch Brothers with Natalie Portman and Jake Gyllenhaal. It's finally available on netflix instant view!
about 5 hours ago
IanMenard: Why yes, I AM starting Prince of Persia on Netflix, because it's available, I'm bored, and - yes - I have a man-crush on Jake Gyllenhaal
about 7 hours ago
Jake Gyllenhall Hides The Afikomen
You sound so threatened by Jake even spending one day with a vag.
some of the Slashies and the GayFANS Are!
Sure, people are afraid that Jake might turn straight! LOL
Don't you just love when trolls, who spent last 5 years calling Ted a liar, are trying to use Ted's gossip as "Jake fucks women" argument?
Some people are beyond stupid.
Poor troll, she thinks that she can discredit Ted. Won't work. Ted looks after his fans.
Dear Ted:
So Reese Witherspoon is getting married again—imminently, apparently. Now, it seems to me that when she and Jake Gyllenhaal split there was a lot of talk about how he wanted to get married but she wasn't ready to settle down. So she's been dating Jim Toth "for about a year," as the tabloids are now saying, with a mention of this seeming contradiction. Your take?
—Christina
Dear Altar Rusher:
Coincidences never exist in Hollywood, come on. Reese's relationship with Jake was nothing like what's going on with her agent-turned-fiancé. There's more than just an image. These two are totally in love, and good for them. The woman needs to move on, as Jake did with all his rebound ladies. A year is a perfectly decent amount of time to date someone when getting married at this point. Plus, she can't let ex Ryan Phillippe out-score her in the postdivorce romance department. Wonder if Ry and Jake got invites to the quickie nuptials, and who their dates would be?
^^Ted is letting us know that Austin and Jake are married by using the word "altar"
These two are totally in love
LOL!
Ted is letting us know that Austin and Jake are married by using the word "altar"
Too silly for words.
Coincidences never exist in Hollywood, come on.
Reese Witherspoon used her engagement to get publicity for that awful movie and is timing the wedding to get publicity for movie with awful Robert Pattinson. One predictable and cheap publicity whore.
Too silly for words.
Why do you say that? Ted is always playing with words
Because there is no reason to believe that Ted's "Altar Rusher" has anything to do with Jake and Austin.
Do you believe that J&A are together still - married or not?
No, they broke up long ago.
Because there is no reason to believe that Ted's "Altar Rusher" has anything to do with Jake and Austin.
Exactly. Talk about grasping at straws. The question is about getting married - there's no hidden message in the fact that Ted used the word "altar."
The letter implies that she doesn't think a year is long enough before getting married, that's why Ted answers with the name "altar rusher". Nothing to do with Jake and Austin.
I'm not sure - I did/do think there was something to the rumors of J&A, and now they could be married with a kid(s), but IDK for sure. I do think some of the over carrying on about it is silly. Name calling and silly behavior from both sides is beneath posters here - and I'll be kind, it's immature bordering on the nutty, if you ask me. You believe what you believe, and that's all there is to it. :)
You believe what you believe, and that's all there is to it.
Are you saying that people shouldn't discuss it here?
now they could be married with a kid(s)
What makes you think that Jake would marry Austin and hide his kids?
What makes you think that Jake would marry Austin and hide his kids?
Do you not get tired of hearing yourself ask that question? It's akin to someone repeatedly banging their head against a wall.
Can someone proclaim a "Jaustin- & BT-free Day" please
Do you not get tired of hearing yourself ask that question?
No, I'm tired of ball-less people who are refusing to answer that question and explain why do they believe what they believe.
BT-free Day? Will I be allowed to leave the basement?
OMG, Bomer is co-hosting the 10 a.m. segment of the Today show, and he just talked about having three kids!!!!!
But Bomer didn't mention who's their father, right?
Are you saying that people shouldn't discuss it here?
Discuss reasonably, yes - attack others, accuse others and act like total idiots in the process - no.
Bomer is co-hosting the 10 a.m. segment of the Today show, and he just talked about having three kids!!!!!
Wow. Are you watching it on TV or on the net?
Did Bomer mention "husband" or "gay"? Doubt it. Still a closet case.
A closet case playing PR games.
There are trolls on both sides of the J&A rumors who delight in provoking and causing trouble. They've got lives? Coulda fooled me.
provoking and causing trouble.
LOL Trolls will never go away, so get over it
^^If it looks like a troll and quacks like a troll ...
Can someone proclaim a "Jaustin- & BT-free Day" please
You have several solutions:
Scroll past a comment containing any of those words.
Start your own discussion.
Take a day off from the blog.
People should feel free to post a comment about whatever they want without being told what they can or cannot say.
What makes you think that Jake would marry Austin and hide his kids?
^ they wouldn't. It's just the crazy's who need J/A to be the poster boys for them.
Not happening.
(If) they did have something special going on, it's now over and we can just hope for them to be friends which I think they are.
Good for Bomer for acknowledging his kids but disappointing that he didn't mention his husband. Hopefully this is the first step to him actually coming out of his glass closet.
Matt Bomer doesn't have kids, his partner has kids.
It's great that Matt Bomer talked about his kids. The guy's got a full name, you know. :)
Johnny Weir: "I Was Never in the Closet!"
Clay Aiken: "There was this misconception that I was not out."
I guess Matt Bomer will claim something similar one day.
Bitches, please.
It's great that Matt Bomer talked about his kids.
Why?
Because straight couples do without a second thought, and all families should as well.
^^be able to talk about their families freely.
Matt Bomer doesn't have kids, his partner has kids.
You know this how? You know for a fact he didn't adopt the kids? You don't know any of that, so stop pretending you do.
(If) they did have something special going on, it's now over and we can just hope for them to be friends which I think they are.
Then who has Jake been with for the past 4 years? It certainly hasn't been Reesey or Tay Tay. I'm now about 75% sold on Jake still being with Austin Nichols. Jake went into the closet the same year he was still VERY closely associated with only one person...Austin (e.g. JFC all day assignation in Austin's trailer , Borders Bookstore, JAR and other restaurant sightings, rumors swirling about having a baby together). Yet, throughout the past 3.5 years we've only seen Jake associated with beards or phony associations with women like Munn, Lucas, Bilson -- even a little Dunst recycling during the filming of Source Code.
As much as Jake worked from the end of 2007-2010, there's no way he even had time to start up a relationship with someone else. He's 30 years old and definitely seems like a home body. So yeah, Austin is more than likely still in the picture just pushed into the closet...hidden away. While Jake publicly preens around like the everyday, heterosexual hound dog (the overkill this past January and February was particularly nauseating). The question is what's he going to do now. The latest article in Men's Life indicates that he's going to "rebrand" himself from the most eligible bachelor to Hollywood's most discreet. Probably hinting that since Jake doesn't have anything new coming up and Nichols is about to finish his last year on One Tree Hill that Jake is going to be pushing himself deeper into the closet as well. For how long? Who knows?
You know this how?
Matt Bomer doesn't have kids, his partner has kids.
Long time ago an article about Simon, the father, surrogate mothers and his kids was posted here.
Matt Bomer doesn't have kids, his partner has kids.
You know this how?
Long time ago an article about Simon, the father, surrogate mothers and his kids was posted here, and he was talking about being a gay father and expecting twins.
Here is the article:
February 2008
http://www.wmagazine.com/celebrities/2008/02/growing_generations
Do you not get tired of hearing yourself ask that question?
No, I'm tired of ball-less people who are refusing to answer that question and explain why do they believe what they believe.
Well, the person who keeps asking that question got an answer. And, I have to say it's a persuasive argument. I never thought about how closely Jake was associated with Austin up through the beginning of Reeke and their "coming out" charade in Rome. In fact, just as Ted suggests, Reeke was all about Austin and probably BT. Thanks for the reminder about why Reeke happened in the first place.
Then who has Jake been with for the past 4 years?
What kind of question is that???
We didn't see ANYTHING that would suggest Jake and Austin are together, but you have no problem believing they are raising kids together.
At the same time you think it is impossible for Jake to date a guy or guys and keep it hidden.
What kind of logic is that???
What kind of logic is that???
Austin uses great disguises! DUH!
As much as Jake worked from the end of 2007-2010, there's no way he even had time to start up a relationship with someone else.
But Jake decided to have a kid during that time? He had time for being a father?
Sorry, that "argument" is void, people don't need serious relationships to date and have sex.
I know Matt Bomer has a full name, but I like calling him Bomer. :D
Good for Bomer for acknowledging his kids but disappointing that he didn't mention his husband.
Someone always has to find negative to say even when someone like Bomer does the right thing.
Since Matt's friend talked to a gay blog and told them about Simon and the children, I've always assumed that it was just a matter of time before he'd b e completely out. And he's easing out just as he's starting to get a big career--one that involves playing the lead in a show in which his sexiness is played up.
It is truly revolutionary, and if you can't see what a big step this is for HW, then I think you just don't really get HW.
Sorry, that "argument" is void, people don't need serious relationships to date and have sex.
Okay, so a well thought out argument is immediately dismissed with a non answer. That's not what the poster said. I think it's pretty obvious that whoever keeps beating the drum that there are no persuasive arguments that point to Jake and Austin still being together has another agenda. No, the arugment is not voided just because you don't like where it leads.
Matt wears a wedding ring and is clearly helping raise the children even if they are not his by blood--something that is of course always going to be the case when a gay couple has a child. An maybe he has adopted them.
Either way, he has the right to call think of them as his children.
We didn't see ANYTHING that would suggest Jake and Austin are together
I'm not going to go over all the evidence that has been posted about these two still being together. You continue to ignore it because you can't stand the idea of them being together. I also love the way you use the collective pronoun of "we" as if you are speaking for the entire blog. Surely, I'm going to be called a loon in a few minutes because we know how persuasive that argument is.
I think the poster's comments about Austin not only being the only man Jake was last closely associated with, but also the one who was still in the news the day Jake and Reese made it official is an interesting take and defintely aligns with Ted's timeline too. Hadn't thought of it that way. Guess that's what happens when trolly asks for someone to respond to their question by arrogantly asserting that no one has the balls to respond. Too funny. Sometimes you get what you wish for, huh? LOL!
What the fuck are you talking about you loon, are you talking to yourself and trying to convince yourself?
You are trying way too hard and you aren't convining anyone, not even yourself.
Maybe if you would stop feeding Ted your fanfic he would stop posting BS fanfic.
Take this shit over to OMG, this is a TT blog not a Jaustaloon blog.
I know Matt Bomer has a full name, but I like calling him Bomer. :D
Fair enough. :)
I agree, it's a big deal - and I'm sure they are as much his as his partner's kids. Hooray!
12:43, you're grasping for straws and you know it.
Somehow you have forgotten about Kirsten and Juliet (think that's her name.
And no matter how much "you are in the know", you can call Reese and Taylor a beard, but you don't know what they did behind closed doors. It helps you to act like you know, but, YOU don't.
I know Jake having sex with females upset you, but he could be bisexual, he could have been going thru a phase if he was dealing with Austin. Do you know how many men who have sex with men on the side without most people knowing it who are married and dating girls. I'm not gonna judge, but it happens much more that the (slashies and gays) here know about, well, the gays here Should know this. Since they are the ones having sex with married men and men with gf.
Some of those guys don't see themselves as gay and never will. You can label all you want.
Now back to J/A. You have said nothing but come with a bunch of thrown together hypothosis and sightings of J/A. It does not make it true..
Get over it.
Austin has said he is with Sophia. Believe HIM. If he said he was with Jake, what would YOU do??????
And, this does not mean they did not have something going on, or something on the side.
Sorry, these two don't see themselves as gay no matter what Teddy says, (as if he knows).
Open your eyes and smell the coffee.
If anything they could be bisexual.
And this is only going on rational thinking and sitings, not WISHFUL Thinking!
Take this shit over to OMG, this is a TT blog not a Jaustaloon blog.
This blog is called Waiting for Toothy. There is no stipulation that the typing of A-u-s-t-i-n is against its rules.
And aren't you just the Welcome Wagon? Sorry, unless you are Jackie, you don't have the right to run people off just because you don't like the word "Austin".
What the fuck are you talking about you loon, are you talking to yourself and trying to convince yourself?
No, I'm not talking to myself. I just came back from walking my dogs, booted up my laptop and just as I suspected I'm being called a loon. Just shows you the mentality I'm dealing with here. I certainly figured out long ago that there are people who absolutely do not want Jake associated with Austin Nichols. I mean to the point of fanaticism. Too close to home I think. Any reasonable person can see that my argument was not crazy. But, then you know that, don't you?
You are trying way too hard and you aren't convining anyone, not even yourself.
Oh, one more comment before I go. How is posting one argument in response to someone who kept challenging someone to make a persuasive argument trying too hard? Oh, I get it. Even one comment is too many for you, right?
2:11 is the one who sounds crazy to me. I believe that post qualifies as an incoherent rant and homophobic. Both Jake and Austin are gay. Nothing wrong with that. Live with it.
Someone always has to find negative to say even when someone like Bomer does the right thing.
Matt Bomer didn't do the right thing. Last year Bomer claimed that he doesn't talk about his family because mentioning anything about them would turn them into tabloid subjects or some bullshit like that, can't recall exact words.
Today he has no such problem.
I wish Bomer would keep his private life private until he's ready to come out, that would be the right and honorable thing to do.
Long time ago an article about Simon, the father, surrogate mothers and his kids was posted here, and he was talking about being a gay father and expecting twins.
Yeah, funny how you completely ignored the second part of my post where I asked how you knew that Bomer didn't adopt the kids. I may not always agree with destiny, but she is right that someone is always eager to be negative about Bomer. He called them his kids and I guess he would know better than anyone.
I'm not going to go over all the evidence that has been posted about these two still being together.
I've read all WFT2 comments from the last few months - there is no evidence. Zero evidence that Jake and Austin care about being together.
He called them his kids and I guess he would know better than anyone.
Bomer called them his because he didn't want to out himself - he couldn't say my partner's kids or anything like that.
I may not always agree with destiny, but she is right that someone is always eager to be negative about Bomer.
I'm sorry to hear that simple truth bothers you. I hate bullshiting, I hate PR games and it doesn't matter if celebrity is openly gay, closeted or straight.
I think the poster's comments about Austin not only being the only man Jake was last closely associated with, but also the one who was still in the news the day Jake and Reese made it official is an interesting take and defintely aligns with Ted's timeline too.
That was 40 months ago. 3 years and 4 months ago. Jake and Austin had enough time to break up 100 times.
After seeing Blue Valentine, I finally 'get' him. I never really thought he was particularly handsome, and never saw his movies other than The Notebook, which I hated.
But he absolutely blew me away in Blue Valentine. He was dirty, sexy, vulnerable, and had LOADS of charisma, even when his character was fat, ugly and balding. Definitely somebody that lights up more on screen than he does in photographs.
He's also exudes a raw sex appeal and a manliness than a lot of popular leading men in Hollywood right now (think Taylor Lautner, Justin Timberlake, Robert Pattinson, Andrew Garfield) lack.
---
Saw Blue Valentine yesterday and feel exactly the same as OP. I never followed Gosling's career but he is a fantastic actor - same for Michelle Williams. Both seem more interested in doing challenging and interesting roles in smaller films instead of becoming movie stars.
---
Their careers will last a lot longer.
I think a great example of someone who knew this, while in his 20s, is Johnny Depp. During and post-21 Jump Street, he was aware he'd have no future without challenging, quality material.
Jake, I hope you are reading this. But you could be after quick and easy movie star money... :)
Jake: "Getting on those sexiest man lists is the ??????????? for everything in my career"
Damn :)
2:11 is the one who sounds crazy to me. I believe that post qualifies as an incoherent rant and homophobic. Both Jake and Austin are gay. Nothing wrong with that. Live with it.
Yeah, YOU would say that while you sit somewhere in Nebraska eating cheetos reading OUT magazine with a flashlight in the dark dreaming of a J/A wedding.
I don't care what J/A sexuality is. Notice how I said they "could be". While YOU act as if you know. But while you desparately seek for some famous star to be your Gay hero, it would do you well to learn more about human sexuality, especially male sexuality, well, maybe female in your case.
Still, Do some research and some reading and stop all the hoping and a Wishing for the J/A wedding with the babytiles as the ring bairrers. It's not gonna happen.
New poll shows Charlie Sheen beating Sarah Palin, and Obama for President in 2012
We are doomed!!!
I'm not gonna judge, but it happens much more that the (slashies and gays) here know about, well, the gays here Should know this. Since they are the ones having sex with married men and men with gf.
Some of those guys don't see themselves as gay and never will.
Well.
Tell the Truth and Shame the DEVIL !!!!
I don't care what J/A sexuality is. Notice how I said they "could be". While YOU act as if you know.
We KNOW that Jake is gay.
... you can call Reese and Taylor a beard, but you don't know what they did behind closed doors
They were beards and they didn't have sex - that much is certain!
Austin has said he is with Sophia. Believe HIM.
I will. As soon as Austin's body language improves and he starts looking like her real boyfriend.
I know Jake having sex with females upset you, but he could be bisexual, he could have been going thru a phase if he was dealing with Austin.
A phase???
Jake was 30 when he bearded with Taylor Swift. Jake is gayer than pink Christmas tree.
They were beards and they didn't have sex - that much is certain!
^^ Of course, Certain to YOU.
Bradley Cooper and Renee Zellweger have reached their limit.
After less than two years together, the couple have split, multiple sources confirm to UsMagazine.com. Reps for both Cooper and Zellweger had no comment.
Limitless star Cooper, 36, first met Oscar winner Zellweger, 41, six years ago on the set of their thriller Case 39 -- but romance didn't bloom until summer 2009.
After being photographed dining together in NYC in July 2009, the duo were spotted kissing in Spain in early August; the next week, he took her to his Philadelphia home town. The couple remained steadfastly tight-lipped about their relationship in the press. Asked about Zellweger by Details magazine in the June/July 2010 issue, Cooper retorted, "I just can't."
"They're so down to earth and [they] spend time with family whenever possible," a source close to the couple told Us last year. Indeed, Zellweger was spotted frequently in the L.A. area palling around with Cooper's mother. "They're the real deal!" another insider said of the twosome at the time.
Doing press for his new movie Limitless, Cooper stayed typically mum on his love. On the Howard Stern Show on Monday, Howard Stern grilled the Hangover star about Zellweger; Cooper simply denied any engagement plans.
They were beards and they didn't have sex - that much is certain!
^^ Of course, Certain to YOU.
Obvious to everyone with a brain.
They were beards and they didn't have sex - that much is certain!
^^ Of course, Certain to YOU.
You can try and sell bullshit about Reese Witherspoon not being a beard, but tell us that Jake really dated Taylor Swift - I dare you! lol
I dare you!
Have you turned 5 years old yet?
Not even nice try to change the subject - tell us you believe that Jake really dated Taylor Swift, come on! Otherwise everyone will know that even our homophobic troll thinks Jake bearded with Swift :)
No wonder the Jaustaloons are here again trolling with their shit, Mr and Mrs Soapy was at the WH last night on the way to PR!!!
Talk about heads exploding.
Visiting Puerto Rico sounds great, why would Austin miss something like that?
I dare you! lol
What?
What do you constitute as a DATE??
Sure Jake dated the Taylor girl in My opinion. Did they have sex or make love? I don't know and YOU don't know either. Were they just friends and nothing else? I don't know and either do you.
You can play stupid and act as the All Knowing Oracle if you want, but you might want to get off your high horse, come down to earth and deal with rational, logical thinking and reasoning, which is no place for High hopes and Wishing.
YOU know nothing. Period.
And going with your logic of Jake being nothing other that GAY, what makes you think he can't have sex with a woman, Reese, Taylor, Kirsten, Juliet?? Even if he's gay as you say?
Were you born yesterday?
Don't get so Upset of the idea of Jake having sex with a woman.
It really shows the worst in you.
6:39 PM - Gay, closeted actors beard because they don't want sex with women. You know that. We know that.
Do you believe that Jake really dated Taylor Swift?
The Jaustaloon trolls can't understand why Mr Soapy wants to go th PR with Mrs Soapy!
Is OTH over for good?
williambibbiani: Interviewing Jake Gyllenhaal and director Duncan Jones (Moon, Source Code) on Sunday. Anyone want to suggest some questions?
7 minutes ago
Nobody's head is exploding, and in fact I said that Austin would pop up with Sophia around the same time Jake will actually be seen in LA. Since it sounds like he had interviews today in LA, he probably flew to LA yesterday from Austin or where ever he was staying with Austin, and Austin headed to DC.
I don't get why you think someone's head would explode because Austin or Jake spent time with a beard. IT"S JUST WORK, and yes, in the case of Austin and Sophia, friendship and some fun.
IT"S JUST WORK, and yes, in the case of Austin and Sophia, friendship and some fun.
Sorry, You don't beard with some woman for years. WTF do you think's in it for Her????
If Sophia wants some d*** why should she have Austin constantly around her. To play Jacks and jump rope? YOU people with this bearding theory need to try something new because it's getting really old.
Sophia wastes all her time bearding for Austin as if she does not have a life and something better to do which could involve a relationship and sex.
Give me a break.
You people think very little of women with this half ass bearding policy being thrown around here.
Correction - should be:
Women don't beard for some Man for years when you could be living a life with a potential partner or lover! It's riduculous.
I hope Charlie Sheen gets himself together. He made that show, Two and a Half Men, he and the kid (and the housekeeper). One of the funniest shows I have ever seen. He's donating some of the proceeds of his road show to the Japan relief effort too.
Whatever it was he said about his manager pales in comparison to what John Galliano said, IMHO. It could have been said in jest. John Galliano was talking about death camps, from my understanding which should never be done. Ever. There's no comparison with whatever Charlie Sheen said about his manager. He should remember also that it was all kinds of people who were sent to there as well.
I think the world is still waiting for an apology from Mr. Galliano as well.
Um, Destiny there were sightings of Jake in L.A. on Mon- Thur, he was at some restauraunt in L.A. with Jason Marz a singer and was seen jogging at Runyan, plus there was a LAX sighting on Sunday and A twicpic of him in the waiting area at the Austin airport on Sunday.
I know you loons can't seem to find the FB sightings on your own but you must have seen the tweets.
Any tweets placing Jake in TX after Sunday were after the fact and re-tweets,
Jake has been in L.A. all this week while mr and mrs soapy were in NC, now DC and on their wat to PR.
There were no photos of Jake in LA earlier this week or on Sunday. It's well known that when Jake wants people to know he's somewhere, pics appear.
And, Sophia Bush made up shit about dating Austin for 5 years. If you look at her dating history and marriage, it's a bold face lie. Beards lie. That's what they do. And, she probably has a real boyfriend in the wings just like Reese did. The bearding relationship really started in August, 2009. You truly don't think Witherspoon just started dating Toth after she dumped Jake in December, do you? Same with Sophia. There were no TG or Christmas holiday pics with the family. And, Austin's tweets never indicated they were together either.
Oh you silly loon, I know you are pissed when you don't know where Jake-poo is 24/7 and there aren't tedious pics to get your undies wet over but he was in L.A. all this week , don't get pissed because you can't seem to track down the sightings, LOL!!
BTW Toth has known Reese as long as she has known Ryan going back to 1998, so if he was waiting in the wings that's a long wait!!!
I wouldn't be surprised if there are pics of Reese, Ryan and Jim at some CAA event together, LOL
Reese did her part, no hard feelings, Jake's Mom is still friended on her FB and visa versa!
He has been at CAA since he was around 20, left and then came back just like Reese did.
He was her agents gofer for all those years with Ryan so they didn't just meet, they knew each other platonically for years.
When Jake and Reese started Toth was involved with someone else , the summer of 2009 he was "free" and knew the arrangement was going to end sooner than Jake expected, so yeah he was waiting from around late summer.
Also the marriage fits for both, he is in the biz but behind the scenes and very ambitious.
You need to stop basing your theroies on the lack of pics, that is beyond lame.
Austins parents visited him in NC with Sophia, Sophia has spent time with his family in TX and hers in L.A.
Austin doesn't tweet about everything, get real.
You are just jealous of Sophia
Why would anyone be jealous of Sophia Bush? A no talent actress on a more than mediocre show? Who got married and divorced within a year and now needs to try to move her way up the Hollywood food chain by providing her bearding services to notoriously gay men. Talk about lame. That's not even an argument. It's just a childish allegation that someone with the mentality of an 8 year old would use.
And, yes I'm very aware of Jim Toth and his role at CAA. Doesn't mean he wasn't boiking Reesey in 2008-2009. Who cares about 1998. I believe Jake was 17 then and finishing up High School. You just throw a bunch of crap on the wall and hope it sticks.
There are no pictures of Jake in LA because he wasn't there. Otherwise we would have seen real time photos of him jogging, going out for breakfast in Silver Lake or out with his favorite mom, Busy Philips. And, how do you know who Tothy was involved with in 2008. Even if he was, it doesn't mean he was getting some on the side with Reesey. Talk about lame. Your the one who needs to grow up.
Keep spinning, plenty of sightings of Jake in L.A. and you choose to ignore them, and stop with the pics BS, if there were pics you would spin and say that they were taken last month.
Jogging in Runyan canyon and hanging with Jason Mraz, what a cool life!
And yes you are jealous of Sophia because she's young, thin, rich and pretty things that you are not, shitty show or not she has a better life than you.
Toth was too busy with his GD at the time and getting high to think about getting anything from reese on the side then.
Late summer of 2009 is when she decided to expand her production Co and move to larger space and get some advice on actors for films she has plans to produce and that's when Toth started hanging around her more, than a few months later she pulled the plug also it helped that she knew thst Lourdes who cp owns CAA and id her agent had plans to step down eventually and move some people up and that includes Tith, don't you think reese knew that then?
Toth isn't the most powerful person at CAA but he is on his way and that's very powerful and exciting for someone like her.
Plus it helped that he was more willing to sign a pre-nup!
Here is a pic of your fav couple:
http://yfrog.com/gzs22ijj
Now you loons hate Busy too, who do you like?
Its well known that Sophia was living with that other guy from OTH for most of the time she now claims she was with Austin. Obvious she is just a beard as was Reese Kirsten and Swift. Jakes PR went too far with Swift wiping out any doubt about the beards or that Jake was gay. Its become easy to spot the troll and scroll past since she uses the same language all the time. If the troll is so sure Jake is straight why doesnt she start her own blog to tell that story instead of boring everyone here. Oh thats right Babblers has amassed an audience of 8 after all these years. Contrast that to WFT2 with 800 or 900 comments.
Post a Comment