Saturday, 5 March 2011

Music + Soul + Sex

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Last year, I made a big deal about Ricky Martin’s coming out.

Revisiting the blog piece today, I realize I was somehow evoking the spirit of the It Gets Better Project. And while I continue extremely critical of this campaign (for many reasons, not the least are its ageist and classist narratives), I do believe the visualization of imagined possibility is important. For the young boy who, like myself in my early teen years, finds himself living in rural México, seeing a public figure with pop culture prominence spanning a few decades might help in the process of imagining and/or visualizing what being a Brown man who loves other men might look like.

Later in the year, I wrote a piece titled “How Ricky Martin is Changing the Face of Latino Fatherhood,” based on Ricky and his two sons' (Valentino and Matteo) appearance on the cover of People En Español’s father’s day issue. Given People En Español’s circulation, the image of an openly gay Latino father and his children, would be in countless Latina/o supermarkets and living rooms. Yet again, the image of Ricky’s queer Latinidad was helping us imagine a more expansive Latinidad that includes more of us.

Musica+Alma+Sexo cover
With Ricky’s reemergence into the public light, we had the opportunity to see a queer Latino strike down racist stereotypes about inherent homophobia in our communities. Perhaps the best example was on The View when Ricky responded to Joy Behar’s suggestion that his culture kept him from coming out. In a moment that made him even more beautiful in my eyes, Ricky refuses to take the bait and simply states that people all over the world are struggling with their sexuality. (Thank you!)

This morning, Ricky's new album "Música + Alma + Sexo" hit stores and I typed faster than my queer fingers could to download it on iTunes. Refusing to shy away from the "sex" in sexuality by daring to have the word "Sexo" in the title of the album, I am excited to see where Ricky takes us as an openly queer historically sensual performer.

Watching two brown men in an affectionate embrace in the “Lo Mejor De Mi Vida Eres Tú” video, I’m pretty darn sure Ricky will continue to matter to me… and maybe a few other boys.

Source: Today, Ricky Martin matters more than ever by Lorenzo Herrera y Lozano

2,198 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   601 – 800 of 2198   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

this is not OMG, we don't ignore people who post here when we don't agree with them.

Don't like it? Don't go there.

Anonymous said...

Don't worry 1:38 PM, I left OMG six months ago and never looked back, there is no point in trying to have a reasonable discussion with OMG posters.

Anonymous said...

No longer sporting his lush "Prince of Persia" locks, a neatly-shorn Jake Gyllenhaal plays a helicopter pilot who wakes up in some other dude's body on a train that is just minutes away from being engulfed by an outsized CGI-assisted fireball from hell in "Source Code."

Since the first five minutes of the movie -- which opens April 1 -- are now conveniently available online, watch as Gyllenhaal delivers a passably confused performance opposite Michelle Monaghan. We were hoping the rabbit from "Donnie Darko" would make a cameo appearance, but alas, no such luck.

'Source Code': Watch a confused Jake Gyllenhaal in the movie's first five minutes, now online

Anonymous said...

this is not OMG, we don't ignore people who post here when we don't agree with them.
Don't like it? Don't go there.


LOL. Who said the poster goes there? They're posting HERE, if you hadn't noticed. Or maybe you're confused by all those secret clues Austin is giving out in his tweets and you don't know what site you're on.

Anonymous said...

Watch a confused Jake Gyllenhaal in the movie's first five minutes, now online

Looks good and interesting, but Michelle Monaghan's character is annoying.

Jake's Jewish closet said...

The only closet Jake G has been in is the jewish one. The man dates and fucks jewish girls behind closed doors because HW is still very anti seminatic when its comes too its leading men. This is the blind item Ted C has on Jake. You do noticed that all the women Jake dates in public are the prototype female gentiles. There was no way Jake was ever going to marry Reese W and she probably thought otherwise hence her quickie engagement to the Toth dude. Jake spends alot of time in Brooklyn even when Maggie is not there because he dates the many jewish women who live there. Why can't you all see you have been looking at the wrong taboo? Jake is not gay but jewish which in HW and America is almost just as bad.

There are not many known jewish leading heart throbs. Has anyone asked Ted to give hints about Jake's (not Toothy's) blind item? I have but Ted will not reply because it would torpedo Jake as Toothy. Its funny because Ted does print my questions about Toothy but never about Jake and his blind item. YOu have been had. Jake is closeted jewish man and I don't care how may Sesame Street videos he does.

Anonymous said...

Jake Gyllenhaal didn't fuck a female for years and years.

Anonymous said...

No, you're the one who's been had and have your head in a closet.

Jake is flaming gay. Have to give you credit for the new " angle ".

Jewish actresses said...

Scarlett Johansson, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Sarah Silverman, Rachel Weisz, Michelle Trachtenberg, Evan Rachel Wood, Emmy Rossum, Natalie Portman, Phoebe Cates, Winona Ryder, Jennifer Connelly, Mila Kunis, Gwyneth Paltrow, Ginnifer Goodwin, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Selma Blair, Alicia Silverstone, ...

Anonymous said...

VIDEO: Jake Gyllenhaal UrinalGate Now a Creepy Animated Short

http://www.movieline.com/2011/03/video-jake-gyllenhaal-urinalgate-now-a-creepy-animated-short.php

Anonymous said...

How desperate do you have to be to prove Jake is straight to claim he is closeted about dating Jewish women.

An old article from Salon about hot Jewish men in HW.

The Chosen Few

4:56 PM said...

Just seen it was already posted. My bad.

Anonymous said...

If Jake is really in LA right now, why all the mystery about the source of that information? I took someone's suggestion and tried to find out the source, but I didn't have any luck.

In addition to the anon posting the claim here, someone on OMG posting under the name NC said Jake was in LA, as did UV in a post on GB. No one provided a source. I posted a comment on GB asking why people thought he was in LA, and asking if I'd missed photos or some other information about him. Not only did UV not answer the question, she deleted my post.

Very strange.

Anonymous said...

If Jake is really in LA right now, why all the mystery about the source of that information?

I didn't post that info, but my guess would be: Jake finished his festival obligations so the person concluded that Jake went home. That makes sense since he was in NYC just 5 days ago.

Anonymous said...

"Jewish actresses said...
Scarlett Johansson, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Sarah Silverman, Rachel Weisz, Michelle Trachtenberg, Evan Rachel Wood, Emmy Rossum, Natalie Portman, Phoebe Cates, Winona Ryder, Jennifer Connelly, Mila Kunis, Gwyneth Paltrow, Ginnifer Goodwin, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Selma Blair, Alicia Silverstone"

Thanks for proving my point, those hot men from Salon is not what Jakes wants to be. He wants to be the "IT" guy in HW and in middle America and not in some jewish magazine.

Anonymous said...

5:31 PM, Jake is gay, he doesn't give a shit about dating women.

ihj gallery said...

Men's Journal scans

Anonymous said...

Jake Gyllenhaal CinemaSource Interview:

I think I speak for myself as a married man that there are things that come in what you want to do, what you feel like you should do, and what you should do.

What trollies can't stand or the Gyllenbabblers is that Jake is a healthy man of 30 who is gay. The only, and I mean only man who continues to be associated with Jake is Austin Nichols. Do you actually think Jake is celibate? That he doesn't know how to have a regular relationship with a guy? Jake has admitted he's a married man. Austin (aka Grey Goose) is the one and only gay man associated with him since 2002. It seems pretty obvious who Jake's main squeeze is.

Anonymous said...

The only, and I mean only man who continues to be associated with Jake is Austin Nichols.

ONLY by OMG posters and only based on their wishful thinking!

Jake's jewish closet said...

"Jake is flaming gay. Have to give you credit for the new " angle ".

Flaming Jake? Boy people will see what they want to get through life.

"Jake Gyllenhaal didn't fuck a female for years and years"

And how do you know what Jake has fucked. According to your bible, Ted C, toothy has fucked girls as recent as a few months ago according to the last post dedicated to the Toothy blind item. Either you believe Ted in everything toothy (including baby tile) or you are calling TEd a liar. And if you are calling Ted a liar, why should you believe Jake is toothy or gay? YOu can't pick and choose what to believe about Ted's toothy if your blog is based on Ted's own blind item. Either you believe Ted and everything printed about Toothy or you don't trust Ted fully.

You can't overlook the things written about Toothy that you don't want to believe and one of those things being that Ted himself has said Toothy is sleeping with women.

Anonymous said...

Do you actually think Jake is celibate?

Do you actually think that Austin is the only gay man Jake knows and can use for sex????????????????????

Anonymous said...

In addition to the anon posting the claim here, someone on OMG posting under the name NC said Jake was in LA, as did UV in a post on GB. No one provided a source. I posted a comment on GB asking why people thought he was in LA, and asking if I'd missed photos or some other information about him. Not only did UV not answer the question, she deleted my post.

That is strange. Deleted, huh? I also found it weird that everyone tweeted about Jake flying into Austin FROM LA on Thursday night. Talk about obvious. There was a reason we suddenly were privileged with a time/date stamp for Jake's arrival and not by just one or two, but six people. Jake comes and goes with not a peep. But, this time his people wanted us to know when he arrived. Probably because he had been in Austin since earlier in the week.

Anonymous said...

one of those things being that Ted himself has said Toothy is sleeping with women

LIAR, Ted never said not implied nothing like that.

Anonymous said...

"I think I speak for myself as a married man that there are things that come in what you want to do, what you feel like you should do, and what you should do."

Man you are dense, that was a joke if its even real.

Anonymous said...

Man you are the one who is dense. Why would Jake make a joke about being a married man? And, the tone of the interview is completely serious so sell it to someone else.

Anonymous said...

And how do you know what Jake has fucked.

Everyone knows - gay men fuck men.

Anonymous said...

It seems pretty obvious who Jake's main squeeze is.

Is that why Jake stayed away from Austin during all holidays birthday? Jake really cares about him!

Anonymous said...

Jake admits he’s a Married Man in December 2009

Anonymous said...

But, this time his people wanted us to know when he arrived. Probably because he had been in Austin since earlier in the week.

So Jake was hiding in Austin because ...?

Anonymous said...

Jake admits he’s a Married Man in December 2009

Can you please post Jake's quote about having no kids?
No?
I thought so, you pick and choose only what you like!

Anonymous said...

"LIAR, Ted never said not implied nothing like that."

In the latest Crotch/Franco BI he did say that about TT. Someone posted it some days ago.

Anonymous said...

Ted was talking about publicity whoring: "Really, that is so Toothy Tile and completely beneath Crotch's strong convictions to never live his life for the public."

Anonymous said...

Either you believe Ted in everything toothy (including baby tile) or you are calling TEd a liar. And if you are calling Ted a liar, why should you believe Jake is toothy or gay?

Last few years Jake Gyllenhaal faked relationships with Reese Witherspoon and Taylor Swift. Jake is gay as a goose and no one needs Ted Casablanca to tell him that.

destiny said...

Why should Jake talk about having no kids--except to try and stop the rumors. Jake/PR are always out there trying to deal with things they think are a problem.

Regarding Jake and LA, strange indeed that UV would delete a post like that.

I didn't post that info, but my guess would be: Jake finished his festival obligations so the person concluded that Jake went home. That makes sense since he was in NYC just 5 days ago.

I thought most people posting here thought Jake had no reason to be in LA anymore, so why would LA be the assumption, and not, say, NYC?

The thing that I find really strange is why we didn't get any pictures of Jake returning to LA if that is where he has been since Sunday. With SC out in a month, why wouldn't have Jake's pr arrange to have him papped at the airport and get him another story on JJ about promoting his film in Austin.

Anonymous said...

Is that why Jake stayed away from Austin during all holidays birthday? Jake really cares about him!

Jake was in LA for Austin's 30th Birthday. In fact, it was one of the few times the boys were allowed in the same city together...officially. Jake even took an early flight back to old Southern California. Wonder why?

Early Flight From Canada, April 23, 2010

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Why should Jake talk about having no kids--except to try and stop the rumors.

1. There are no BT rumors - even WFT2 posters do not believe Jake is an awful person who would hide his own kid(s).

2. Normal parents would never deny their kids because kids are too precious to them.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Jake was in LA for Austin's 30th Birthday.

Jake was in LA because he was done with Source Code filming.
Jake was out that day, alone and later with some friends. During wekend he was seen with Anne and some other people, there are tweets, photos and discussion about it on WFT2 - he wasn't celebrating with Austin.

Anonymous said...

Can you please post Jake's quote about having no kids?
No?


Trying to change the subject again, I see. Do you have an attention deficit? There would be no reason for Jake to state that he was a married man, if he wasn't. He probably was so mad at what Reesey had done to him that he wanted to go on the record. Didn't think of the consequences. The site was a pretty obscure one and he probably thought few people would notice it. Which actually is true.

Yeah, I'm sure Jake is going to admit he has kids. And, by the way, why would a single guy have to tell an interviewer that he has no kids? Oh, that's right because Jake wanted to prove what a selfish oaf he is. Yet, Anne Hathaway says he is the most nurturing person she has ever known. Hmmmmmmm. Someone's not telling the truth. I suspect it's Jake.

Anonymous said...

I thought most people posting here thought Jake had no reason to be in LA anymore, so why would LA be the assumption, and not, say, NYC?

Jake lives in LA and has a home there + he was in NYC before Austin, TX - as you know.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, I'm sure Jake is going to admit he has kids.

Playing stupid as usual? Jake had no reason to deny kids, he simply stated the fact.

Anonymous said...

How desperate do you have to be to prove Jake is straight to claim he is closeted about dating Jewish women.

God, really, lol. That has to be one of the dumbest things posted here and that's saying something. Besides, the media is always reporting that Jake dated Natalie Portman before they were just friends, and you don't get more Jewish than Natalie! Besides there is no BI about an actor secretly dating Jewish women - how absurd! It's the PEOPLE in the blinds that are secret, not what the people are doing. LOL.

Anonymous said...

Trying to change the subject again, I see. Do you have an attention deficit?

Your attempts to mention only few things that might support your opinion are beyond pathetic and obvious.

Anonymous said...

Jake isn't married, he has no kids and he is currently in L.A.

Jake is married (we have his own words of admission), has several kids (probably why Jake suddenly started bearding so aggressively; and based on Ted's domesticated BIs and other clues accumulated over 3 years), and PR doesn't want to place Jake in LA right now or they would have done so long before today.

Busy about James Franco said...

Franco had created a back story in which his character had "maybe been abused by his father, and so he didn't want any physicality between him and his girlfriend. This was unbeknownst to me," Philipps recalled, giggling. During the scene, the two characters were verbally sparring, and Philipps was meant to slap Franco lightly on the arm.

After doing so, he blew up, saying "'Don't you ever [expletive] touch me again!' and threw me to the ground. I had the wind knocked out of me," Philipps said, adding that she then ran into her trailer crying.
Apatow, probably trying to change the subject, sarcastically responded by saying Franco was the only cast member to since be nominated for an Academy Award.

http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/57240085.html?page=1#comments

destiny said...

You know, how gay closeted men play gay characters to prove they're straight--does that mean Jake did Shalom Sesame (there's a clip on OMG today) as part of his "Jewish closet."

ROFLMAO.

Jake lives in LA and has a home there + he was in NYC before Austin, TX - as you know.

Yes, we all know, although someone has spent most of the past two years telling us how Jake has no reason to be in LA anymore, what with his "crazy" father being the only left there, and his sister, Mom and Chris all back east, and that is why he rarely spends anytime anymore in LA. Really, it had nothing to do with the fact that Austin was working on the east coast.

Anonymous said...

Nonsense 6:33 PM, Jake never acted like a married man with kids and he certainly doesn't give a shit about being anywhere near Austin Nichols.
You can spin as much as you like but you know that Jake spent last Summer away from Austin and he didn't care about spending Thanksgiving, his birthday, Christmas and New Year with his "husband".
Actions speak louder than words.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Really, it had nothing to do with the fact that Austin was working on the east coast.

No, it had nothing to do with Austin. Jake was all over NYC without Austin and Austin was working and spending time with his beard. Sorry, you can't undo facts.

Anonymous said...

You can be a method actor, but you can still be sweet and polite like Heath Leger was. Just saying...to Mr. Franco.

Anonymous said...

Yes, we all know, although someone has spent most of the past two years telling us how Jake has no reason to be in LA anymore

So you decided to ignore common sense and facts about Jake spending time in LA in the past years because someone said that Jake "has no reason to be in LA"???

Anonymous said...

Playing stupid as usual? Jake had no reason to deny kids, he simply stated the fact.

You're the one playing stupid. Of course, Jake has reasons to deny he has kids. Both he and PR know the rumors have been out there since 2007. I even knew about them back when Reeke started. They were plastered all over the Internet.

Jake Gyllenhaal is Gay and Having a Baby said...

Former Hollywood publicist Jonathan Jaxson says that Jake Gyllenhaal is planning to come out some time by the end of next month. Jake is reportedly ready to come out because he and his boyfriend of several years (rumored to be actor Austin Nichols or Chef Chris Fischer) are expecting a baby in September.

Daddy Jake

Jake Gyllenhaal has been dating the same guy for years. Last year Jake and his bf were arrested and brought into the West Hollywood station after the sheriffs office was called after catching Jake and his bf having sex in an SUV behind the restaurant Chin Chins in LA. Both were later released. Jake has been dating this guy for years, even before he broke up with Kirsten Dunst. Kirsten Dunst found out about his bf and confronted him at Chateau Marmont. The confrontation was loud and they broke up right there. News of their break-up followed a few days later. Jake and his bf are currently expecting a baby through a surrogate. They used a company based in Westwood, CA. The baby is due in September."

Anonymous said...

You're the one playing stupid. Of course, Jake has reasons to deny he has kids. Both he and PR know the rumors have been out there since 2007.

One more time - use Google to check, no one discusses or mentions BT rumors because no one in the right mind believes Jake is insane and hides his kids.

Anonymous said...

Why are people desperate to believe bullshit about Jake, Austin and kids?
Can anyone explain because I really don't get it.

Anonymous said...

Nonsense 6:33 PM, Jake never acted like a married man with kids and he certainly doesn't give a shit about being anywhere near Austin Nichols. You can spin as much as you like but you know that Jake spent last Summer away from Austin and he didn't care about spending Thanksgiving, his birthday, Christmas and New Year with his "husband".

Nonsense yourself. You have absolutely no idea who Jake spent the summer with, or Thanksgiving, or his birthday, or Christmas and New Year's.

Oh, I know, your holiday evidence is that realistic pic of Jake with Swifty. Oh my god. They must have spent Thanksgiving Day together. Frozen leaves on the curbside anyone? The arranged photo was probably taken before TG. And during the summer, Jake practically disappeared. But, he did show up in Leadville with Austin in August.

Anonymous said...

One more time - use Google to check, no one discusses or mentions BT rumors because no one in the right mind believes Jake is insane and hides his kids.,

We're discussing it. OMG discusses it. Just Jared and other fan sites mention BT. FanchitChat has an entire thread on the topic. And, of course, Ted discusses it. So you would be wrong.

Anonymous said...

6:54 PM - stop ignoring facts, you aren't fooling anyone.
Jake didn't disappear during Summer, he left Austin in LA and went to NYC and MV and there are tons of sightings and pictures of Jake and Maggie and Peter - everything is posted and discussed here.
Jake was working (bearding) and spending holidays with his family.
Austin spent holidays with his beard and his family.
Again, you can't undo facts.

Anonymous said...

No, it had nothing to do with Austin. Jake was all over NYC without Austin and Austin was working and spending time with his beard. Sorry, you can't undo facts.

Sure, it's easy, particularly when you just make stuff up. Jake is in the closet. He is not going to be hanging around Austin OPENLY in public. Why do you think Jake does those annual photo ops with Austin. It's because he is telling people the guy is still in his life.

Anonymous said...

But, he did show up in Leadville with Austin in August.

And you can't fake photos that easy - man in Leadville wasn't Austin, everyone can see that.

Anonymous said...

Jake is in the closet. He is not going to be hanging around Austin OPENLY in public.

Jake is hanging out openly with his friends, and without Austin, all the time. Jake and Austin are in different cities and different coasts all the time.
That has nothing to do with being gay.

Anonymous said...

Why do you think Jake does those annual photo ops with Austin. It's because he is telling people the guy is still in his life.

You mean to tell people that Austin and his beard are still in his life?

Anonymous said...

Would you stop with the everyone has been discussing BT since 2007. I no for a fact that someone on FCC fed J. Jaxson recyled TT BI's knowing he was dumb enough to post them same as the BT crap.

They wanted the gossip out there beyond Ted to prove that everyone knew and was talking about it.

Not only was Jackson dumb but had connections to NE at the time, they used him to pimp Ted's BI's.

well it blew up in their faces and jackson finally realized he was used.

And TT fangirls posting in the comments section of JJ doesn't count.

I'm sure ted appreicated the efort, floating his story w/o doing it himself but it failed.

According to the loons, Reese, her kids, Ryan, the cast of Nailed, Pop, Brothers, SC, LAOD and How Do you know all know about BT's, boy can they keep a secret, LOL!!!

PS: The loons know that wasn't Austin in Co and how can they not know that he is fucking with them with his stupid tweets.

Anonymous said...

Jake didn't disappear during Summer, he left Austin in LA and went to NYC and MV and there are tons of sightings and pictures of Jake and Maggie and Peter - everything is posted and discussed here.

No, there were not "tons" of sightings. Just a smattering. Jake was pretty incognito the whole summer. A few well placed blurbs in the Boston papers, but after his LA high profile shots at the Lakers game and with Adam Levine he pretty much vanished at the end of June. (Btw: Austin was back on the East Coast at that time too). Remember how everyone was so surprised with that full beard Jake had grown? There's one isolated photo of him practically running out of a store in late July (supposedly in LA) but when he actually appears in public for Busy's daughter's B-day party he looks like a mountain man. Then he shows up in Leadville and is accidently photographed with Austin. Soon afterwards, we see him in a Cabin looking mighty strange and annoyed that he's been followed there. Then he disappears again for most of September. No I would say he was pretty much not around. Really the first time I have ever seen him so hidden away from the world. Awfully odd for a footloose and fancy free single man, with no responsibilities, don't you think?

Anonymous said...

Really the first time I have ever seen him so hidden away from the world.

Made up bullshit.
There were tons of sightings, a lot of them posted on WFT2 - everyone can check them and see that you are spinning and lying.

Anonymous said...

Then he shows up in Leadville and is accidently photographed with Austin.

Another obvious lie.

Anonymous said...

Wow, 7:13. You just are so "in the know." Far above all us mere mortals. Wonder why you are wasting all those wonderful contacts of yours on a looney blog like WFT2. We are simply not worthy of your intelligence and all omniscient ways.

Yes, every sentence is dripping with sarcasm. Just in case I was too subtle.

Anonymous said...

Another obvious lie.,

Nope. There's a photo this time, my friend. Try to be mature and admit you're wrong. And, yes, those are Austin's ears.

Anonymous said...

7:26 PM - so how come Jake prefers traveling and spending time away from Austin? Their kids don't need both parents?

Anonymous said...

That whole Jaxson bullshit was obvious from the git and confirmed by people that posted on FCC. That site is rather clannish and the same people pretty much post on Gossip rocks.

When the Jackson scam went down in flames, the person behind it fessed up, not on the site of course.

I assume they are still there participating in the BT thread.

Also after his August TT inspired post, he did another one about the birth of BT. He wasn't going to do it but he was egged on by the same person that lied and said that Perez had a pic of Jake and Austin with the baby leaving the hospital in L.A., LOL And he fell for it, Jackson and Perez were having a public spat at the time. After that he just stopped and cut off all contact with the loon at FCC.

Poor Jackson, calling Austin's dad, calling the hospital, LOL!!

What happened to that moron anyway??

PS It's no coincidence that OMG has the FCC site linked, that site is so clannish....

7:35, you ain't fooling anyone

Anonymous said...

Made up bullshit.
There were tons of sightings, a lot of them posted on WFT2 - everyone can check them and see that you are spinning and lying.


You would be wrong. I welcome people to find tons of photos of Jake from the end of June to the end of September, 2010. (Besides, of course, the ones I already mentioned.) Remember, you said "tons."

Anonymous said...

And, yes, those are Austin's ears.

We did side-by-side comparison (picture was posted on WFT2) and it was easy to see that man in that picture wasn't Austin - different earlobe shapes.

You are free to post your side-by-side pictures.

Anonymous said...

7:26 PM - so how come Jake prefers traveling and spending time away from Austin? Their kids don't need both parents?

I think they are together far more than you would like. Sorry, but I don't think Jake is a whore.

Anonymous said...

I welcome people to find tons of photos...

Learn to read - "there were tons of sightings". And yes, there were photos too, proving that Jake was fine with spending his Summer away from Austin.

Anonymous said...

We did side-by-side comparison (picture was posted on WFT2) and it was easy to see that man in that picture wasn't Austin - different earlobe shapes.,

It's Austin Nichols. I'm a different poster, but I saw that picture the day the discussion happened on OMG back in October. That's him. I was surprised that Jake screwed up like he did, but he probably didn't think some marathon blogger was going to care about Jake Gyllenhaal and his "film crew." He was wrong, of course.

Anonymous said...

I think they are together far more than you would like.

We would like??????????
You can think and wish what ever you want, just don't expect people to ignore facts and common sense.

Anonymous said...

It's Austin Nichols.

That wasn't Austin Nichols, the man had different earlobe, you can't sell a lie so easily when there is a good quality photo.

Anonymous said...

there were tons of sightings". And yes, there were photos too, proving that Jake was fine with spending his Summer away from Austin.

There were not tons of sightings either. And, you know it. Some of them were posted by the Martha's Vineyard duo whom everyone knows is in the pocket of visiting celebrities on MV. And, by the way, just because Jake is officially sited with Tom Welling or Sugar Ray Leonard or Chris Fischer on July 9-10 doesn't mean that Austin wasn't there with him.

Anonymous said...

Different earlobes??? Are you kidding me? Talk about grasping for straws, when the face is pretty darn obvious. It's Austin.

Anonymous said...

Please stop loons, Peter and his film crew showed up in Co because he was interested in doing a movie abiut that runner, Jake just tagged along.

I would assume they were well aware there would be pics, people were there to cover that race.

Not only is the ears all wrong but the height and legs and please dont say he was slouching and that man's legs were not long and lanky, just average.

He was most likely a member of Peter's film crew.

That pic was posted on various Jake sites before OMG or I should say peegee discovered it over a month later!!

And it wasn't the ears or legs of course because they didn't match but of a twicpic that moron Austin took of a pair of feet sitting on the throne, the sneakers were the same nike style and color of a pair jake wore that day and she decided it was a shoutout, LOL!!!

Now mind you the pic was posted on most Jake sites since the end of Aug, but it was just discovered in late Sept? You would have thought that they would have spotted it right away it it was so obvious.

The guy who they think was Austin had simiar sneaks but had some type if red marking on it, I bet Austin couldn't find thatpair so he chose the other.

How much you wanna bet he had one of his castmates either take the pic or it was them in the stall, shits and giggles.

And I swear Austin and sophia were in TX then and they may be the real reason they are pretending that was Austin

Anonymous said...

8:01 PM - cut the crap, you can NOT see man's face at all.
I'm sure that even you are smart enough to understand that one man can't change earlobe shape over night.

Anonymous said...

Since we have that Leadville pic for posterity, it'll be so much fun when photo stills or screencaps appear of Austin in that Miley Cyrus flick, LOL, that he filmed just before Leadville. When those two pics are posted side by side smart money says they won't look anything alike. :-)))

Anonymous said...

Different earlobes??? Are you kidding me? Talk about grasping for straws, when the face is pretty darn obvious. It's Austin.

LOL! You can't even see "the face" in that pic. But no amount of commonsense will budge you from your delusion.

Anonymous said...

LOLLLLL! Has the trolly's head exploded yet. :-D

Anonymous said...

No not yet, trolly is still trying to find a pic of Austin in disguise - y'know how he put on his Ronald McDonald red wig and clown make-up so he could sneak up to the balcony to sit with hubby at SC premiere.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Why should Jake talk about having no kids--except to try and stop the rumors. Jake/PR are always out there trying to deal with things they think are a problem.

Destiny, you're really too old for this, Really. The obvious is nobody has seen Jake and Austin together and the chances of them being together is very slim and you know this, well, any sane person understands this. The only person who don't understand this, is someone Who CAN'T understand this. There in lies the problem.

Anonymous said...

Jake was in LA for Austin's 30th Birthday.

Jake was in LA because he was done with Source Code filming.
Jake was out that day, alone and later with some friends. During wekend he was seen with Anne and some other people, there are tweets, photos and discussion about it on WFT2 - he wasn't celebrating with Austin.

********

^ What, Jake didn't spend the day making sexy time with Austin on his Bday? But he spent it with everyone else but Austy? Wow, what a couple. Is this the Ideal couple that (M at OMG) loves to worship?

Ya think Austin was with Sophia? on his birthday. Naw??
Come on where are (were) the tweets on his bday. Ya know he had to tweet that day, but he was not with Jakey.

Anonymous said...

Former Hollywood publicist Jonathan Jaxson says that Jake Gyllenhaal is planning to come out some time by the end of next month. Jake is reportedly ready to come out because he and his boyfriend of several years (rumored to be actor Austin Nichols or Chef Chris Fischer) are expecting a baby in September.

Daddy Jake

Jake Gyllenhaal has been dating the same guy for years. Last year Jake and his bf were arrested and brought into the West Hollywood station after the sheriffs office was called after catching Jake and his bf having sex in an SUV behind the restaurant Chin Chins in LA. Both were later released. Jake has been dating this guy for years, even before he broke up with Kirsten Dunst. Kirsten Dunst found out about his bf and confronted him at Chateau Marmont. The confrontation was loud and they broke up right there. News of their break-up followed a few days later. Jake and his bf are currently expecting a baby through a surrogate. They used a company based in Westwood, CA. The baby is due in September."


^^ JJ was too thru when he found out he was duped and went all around running his mouth. Even calling Austins father, LMAO. Another befuddled LOON.
JJ gave up and I think he apologized and never been seen or heard from the HW scene again.
He was also pissed.

Anonymous said...

Troll is losing it bad today. Her definition of tons is 1 photo and 1 tweet. If she is so sure that Jake and Austin are not together she would not waste her time defending her position or trolling this site. And as for Jake not wanting to be labeled Jewish. Bad timing troll. He just did the Shalom Sesame. He talks about his Bar Mitzvah and goes home for all the Jewish holidays. He has never hidden his Jewishness like he hides being gay. Besides while 50% of Hollywood is gay 90% is Jewish. I cant help but notice that the troll has come unglued ever since Austin was spotted at Leadville. It threw her for a real loop.

Anonymous said...

12:04 AM - you are bat shit crazy.

Anonymous said...

I cant help but notice that the troll has come unglued ever since Austin was spotted at Leadville. It threw her for a real loop.

Are you for real?! Only OMG loons believe that was Austin, and furthermore, only loons believe that J&A are married (lol). For the rest of us, it provides a good laugh - just like your post has. But please keep posting your comedy gold LOL!!

Anonymous said...

I have to ask again :)

Why are people desperate to believe bullshit about Jake, Austin and kids?
Can anyone explain because I really don't get it.

6:51 AM said...

P.S. I'm TB since 2006, I know Jake is gay.

Anonymous said...

Maybe because it's true. Your boy Jake is gay. He most likely married in 2007 during a California window of opportunity, hence the wedding band that he was photographed purposely and openly wearing to London for PoP promo work and was accidentally seen through a gaping shirt during Reeke. He has now been quoted as speaking as a married man.

With marriage, children quickly followed.

It doesn't matter if you don't get it, sorry. It's not stopping the train because the train has long taken off.

Anonymous said...

You have a quote (which could be one of Jake's gyllenbabble cases) and you choose to ignore everything else, including Jake's "I have no kids" quote.
On the other hand there is reality in which Jake and Austin don't act like a couple and never act like responsible parents.

So what would every reasonable person conclude?

Anonymous said...

7:20am, Austin has told us all of this in his secret tweets. Keep up with the latest developments!

Anonymous said...

It doesn't matter if you don't get it, sorry.

We all get it.
You are desperate for Jake and Austin to be a couple and you don't give a damn about facts, Jake and Austin's behavior or common sense.

Anonymous said...

7:20am, Austin has told us all of this in his secret tweets.

Tweets about "his woman"? Or pictures of Sophia and his family?

Anonymous said...

hence the wedding band that he was photographed purposely and openly wearing to London for PoP

Another lie.
There was no wedding band, Jake did not wear a ring on the ring finger of the left hand.

Anonymous said...

Tweets about "his woman"? Or pictures of Sophia and his family?

C'mon get with the program! They are secret tweets intercepted by Agent Peegee while she scours the internet reading slash.

Anonymous said...

Damn, I don't have the code book!

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
hence the wedding band that he was photographed purposely and openly wearing to London for PoP

Another lie.
There was no wedding band, Jake did not wear a ring on the ring finger of the left hand.

March 16, 2011 7:32 AM

My thoughts exactly, he wore it on his right hand and the ring had a sort of platinum/white-gold design to it. Nothing similar to the gold wedding band he wore on a chain around his neck which accidently peeked out of his shirt at one time.
But yes,I firmly believe he is married, although I am quite sure it isn't to mr Nichols I m convinced he is married to another man.

Anonymous said...

Another man? Who could that be? Someone we don't know?

Anonymous said...

Get some perspective will you - there could be a nuclear meltdown(s) in Japan, and yet all some of you care about is J&A. It's not that big of a deal to come "unglued" about, seriously.

Anonymous said...

I would guess most of us don't know him personally, but some of us might know OF him.

Anonymous said...

One of the Banana Boyz?

Anonymous said...

Don't think so but I guess anything/anyone is possible...
=)

Anonymous said...

austinluvsmoney austin otteman
so can i ask you somethin @ManMadeMoon its about chicks and dating them


@austinluvsmoney Not really my area of expertise, fellah! Jake is more the ladies man than me.


Getting ready for all the "it's PR".

ROFLMAO

Anonymous said...

I would guess most of us don't know him personally, but some of us might know OF him.

Well? Who is Jake's husband? :)

Anonymous said...

If it isn't Austin...

then I would guess, Chris?

Anonymous said...

I think Chris is great husband material.

Anonymous said...

Adam "Jake's str8" Levine?

Anonymous said...

Chris + Jake = Cake :)

Anonymous said...

Chris is hot :)

Anonymous said...

He is very hot. :) And he can cook.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Well? Who is Jake's husband? :)

March 16, 2011 9:00 AM

In case a statement can't be proven by facts, I suppose we have to remain silent?

Anonymous said...

Chris + Jake = Cake :)

That's the best celeb couple name combination I have seen yet. Yum!

Ted said...

Dear Ted:
I love the Blind Vices, and I have some pretty good guesses, but there is one that I can't quite figure out. There is a very popular guess out there for Toothy Tile, and I kind of believe it, except I'm not sure how Baby Tile comes into the picture. Is it really possible for a celeb to keep their child a secret? He can't be a very active father. Does the kid live with the birth mother or maybe with some relative of his? I'm totally confused.
—jade_blossom26

Dear Doubt Before You Think:
Exactly why I don't get the popular guess. Does no one realize there is a baby involved and that Toothy is not doing a good job letting us all in on how the babe's doing these days? Either way, we're told someone is raising that little nugget in the proper non-vicey environment.

Anonymous said...

9:03 AM; There is something Fishy... :-) about Chris isn't it?
Why did he all of a sudden seem to vanish out of Jake's life a few years ago?
Was it becuase PR or whoever it was suggested Jake should distance himself from other guys?
He IS great marriage material though, or so it seems.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Hasn't Ted just killed off the notion that Jake is Toothy?.

Anonymous said...

Dear Doubt Before You Think:
Exactly why I don't get the popular guess...


Everyone knows that Jake is the popular guess. Is Ted saying that Jake is not Toothy?

Anonymous said...

No, Ted is just babbling.

Anonymous said...

Ted is still drunk from last night.

Anonymous said...

"we're told someone is raising that little nugget in the proper non-vicey environment" = Jake doesn't raise his kid.

Jake couldn't wait to be a father so he decided to have a kid in secrecy, but he doesn't care enough to raise BT? Doesn't make any sense.

Anonymous said...

Quick, hide anything sharp away from the Jaustaloons.

Anonymous said...

Ted will give us a shout-out tomorrow to let his OMG fans know that he was only joking.

Ted said...

Stay tuned!

Anonymous said...

Chris has a girlfriend.

Anonymous said...

"we're told someone is raising that little nugget in the proper non-vicey environment" = Jake doesn't raise his kid.


LOL. Another time Ted said that Toothy was "active" in raising BT. He must be sending secret messages to OMGers again ;)

Floor plan said...

"we're told someone is raising that little nugget in the proper non-vicey environment"

I can't wait to see the spinning. The other day prairiegirl had it all worked out, how all the BTs live with Jake - you see, the first two BTs are twins and they share a room, and then the third BT has another room. LOL.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Chris has a girlfriend.

March 16, 2011 10:02 AM

Interesting!
Who is she?

Jake said...

Chris has a girlfriend.

Shut up, I'm all man!

Anonymous said...

girlfriend or "girlfriend"? ;)

Chris said...

I don't kiss and tell!

Anonymous said...

Jaxson had a post in which he talked about Toothy's boyfriend taking BT home from the hospital, how come that one is never posted or discussed? That didn't come from Ted. Some people thought Perez got the information, but was afraid to use it because he was in bed with all the big star's pr.

AT comment said...

LOL at Toothy raising that little nugget. What do you think of when you hear nugget? Gold, right? A little gold nugget. Well guess what, the first part of Gyllenhaal, the Gyllen part, means gold in Swedish. It was no accident that Ted described Baby Tile as a little nugget.

Anonymous said...

As a native Swedish speaker, I'd say the proper translation would be "golden", so I guess gold is close enough.

Anonymous said...

11:39: From what I heard about the person on FCC that egged on Jackson, they made that up. Ted first started the BT BS in 1/07, so they figured 9 mos the faux kid would be born, that would be around 10/07.

Jackson wasn't going to get pulled into that again but they convinced him that Perez had a pic ( he was fueding publically with Perez at the time) The fool fell for it and it blew up in his face, he said he asked Perez and he said that he didn't know what the hell he was talking about. There was no pic of them leaving Ceders with a kid, CEDARS!!! Closet cases that are sneaking around making babies would never go there, use your noggin.

Perez may be in PR's pocket but he would throw Jake under the bus in a hot minute for a pic like that, Jake isn't important int the HW food chain.

And speaking of assholes being fed TT crap, didn't Ian Halperin actually do some snooping and come up with no BT? Remember??

Anonymous said...

Ian was an even bigger joke than Jaxson. I thin Jaxson was an idiot, but don't for a minute think someone on FCC egged him on.

Perez was "bought" by Jake's people for sure--he had the first and "exclusive" story about Reeke being an official couple.

Anonymous said...

didn't Ian Halperin actually do some snooping and come up with no BT? Remember??

Can't recall if Ian mentioned BT one way or another.

Anonymous said...

One of the loons asked him to look intot it, he never posted his finding but he did when he did a podcast.

No BT as per Ian. Prez and other loggers are in PR's pockets but I never believd that he had a pic. Jackson was dumb enough to use recyled BT BI's fed to him that he embellished so why not the baby?

At that point he knew he was had and knew about the BT crap that was added to the TT BI. So IMO he embellished and names the most well know hospital in L.A>, LOL, also even that dummy knows that a baby is caried for 9 months and viola!

He may have used Perez's name to make like he was going to out-scoop him because they were feuding.

And why would he do that knowing it was BS? Publicity, even if proven BS he was willing to do it to draw attention to his site, it didn't work.

Anonymous said...

I have to ask again :)

Why are people desperate to believe bullshit about Jake, Austin and kids?
Can anyone explain because I really don't get it.


Because they "WANT" to.

Some posters are gay and believe the rumors totally. Some of them also feel betrayed, so they lash out at Jake. So, most of their post are negative around the net whenever Jake is mentioned. Why, I don't get it. You can believe he's gay without chastising someone. He owes no apologies, statements or excuses if he is.

Some others just can't fathom the idea of life without a blissful LOVE relationship between Jake and Austin. They will attack you if you don't see things their way. Their belief is Jake and Austin are a couple, some think they are married and hiding a child or children from the spotlight and everything is PR menipulated. Everything! These people need help NOW because they just have to be or "their" worlds seem to fall apart with logical reasoning that Jake and Austin never spend time together and if they were an item, time and distance says they are not now. And there is no time from the both of them to raise a child, let alone children.

Anonymous said...

Everyone knows that Jake is the popular guess. Is Ted saying that Jake is not Toothy?

^^^^ Y.E.S

or he's back tracking and trying to get out of a bullshit blind vice he made up because he didn't think it would go this damn far.

Babytile was riduculous and the last straw for most fans of toothy. Now in earlier post, Ted is saying Toothy has sex with women. So he's changing things.
They gays will not have this.

Anonymous said...

And there is no time from the both of them to raise a child, let alone children.

That's "fixed" - "we're told someone is raising that little nugget in the proper non-vicey environment"!

Anonymous said...

^^ WTF? LMAO

Ted will give us a shout-out tomorrow to let his OMG fans know that he was only joking.

^^ WTF?? LMAO



^ WOW..... ROTFLMAO Too funny!

Anonymous said...

Quick, hide anything sharp away from the Jaustaloons.

^^ Too funny

Anonymous said...

And speaking of assholes being fed TT crap, didn't Ian Halperin actually do some snooping and come up with no BT? Remember??

Yes, he egged his readers on with some late breaking news which was rehashed bullshit then he was silenced just as any celebs. attorneys do to wannabees, so he left the Jake/Toothy thing alone and moved on to something else. Never to talk about Jake ala Toothy = gay HW star again.

Anonymous said...

And there is no time from the both of them to raise a child, let alone children.
***
That's "fixed" - "we're told someone is raising that little nugget in the proper non-vicey environment"!


And you believe Purple Pigs fly?

Anonymous said...

And you believe Purple Pigs fly?

Of course they do!

Anonymous said...

1:48, Yes, Ian said not only was there no BT but he found nothing to indicate that Jake and Austin were anything more than friends. He DID say though that Jake had been involved with other guys and was gay. (He also said that Jake was in love with Heath and was really fucked up after he died).

OT WTF? said...

Tom C's kid holding a box of PENIS GUMMIES

http://dlisted.com/node/41217

Anonymous said...

Babbler in the house at 1:25. We know you hate it when anyone says the word gay and Jake in the same sentence.

Always thought Ian was catering to the Brokies, and the fact he seemed to know zip about Austin shows how little he knows. Regardless of whether you think Jake and Austin are together, I don't think anyone here thinks Austin is straight, which is what I recall Ian saying.

Even Lamey knows Austin is gay.

Anonymous said...

We know you hate it when anyone says the word gay and Jake in the same sentence.

Sorry Prudence, If the shoe fits, then YOU need to wear it.
"Most" gay fans here or anywhere else are upset with him after following the rumors. And they lash out about him anytime or place. Is this YOU?

Why do you feel so betrayed is the question?

Anonymous said...

Babbler in the house at 1:25

LOL. Definitely a Babbler, so obvious. So worried about what is said here and so militant about defending Jake's heterosexuality, it's hilarious. What's so funny is that if they were so sure he was the straightest and the most heterosexual of manly men, they wouldn't hang out here 24/7 giving their lectures. Dead giveaway that they know in their little phoney babbler hearts that Jake is a phoney, too :D

Anonymous said...

And there is no time from the both of them to raise a child, let alone children.
***
That's "fixed" - "we're told someone is raising that little nugget in the proper non-vicey environment"!


Come on, admit it, that's perfect explanation for Jake and Austin's parent unlike behavior! :)

Anonymous said...

TBH compared to Ted C.'s TT extraordinary tales Ian Halperin's Jake stories sounded sane. Even UFO stories are more believable than Ted.

Joe Jonas: "I'm not gay!" said...

"There's nothing wrong with being gay," Joe Jonas says, "but I'm not."

The middle Jonas brother, 21, was bluntly asked if he's gay by paparazzi last January. Details speculates that part of the reason for the rumors may have been Jonas's playful video homage to Beyonc's "Single Ladies," in which he dressed in a leotard and heels and danced to make good on a sports bet with some friends.

Anonymous said...

TBH compared to Ted C.'s TT extraordinary tales Ian Halperin's Jake stories sounded sane. Even UFO stories are more believable than Ted.

:)

Anonymous said...

I wondered why the two Jaustin sentries rode over here from OMG and came out swinging on Monday. You can always tell, it's just before Ted drops a bombshell. ;)

Anonymous said...

My theory is that Ted either saw what he wanted to see that day in that restaurant where he spotted Jake and Austin or he exaggerated enormously about what he saw. Ted knew Jake had completed filming BBM and broke up with Dunst at the time. He saw Jake with Austin in that restaurant. Maybe this "hand holding" was a misinterpretation of the situation? Or it indeed happened, but it still could have been an experiamental phase for Jake or he is bi, does't mean he is necessarily gay. If there was somthing going on with Nichols, it's probably long over. If nothing went on with Nichols, then it was really silly of Ted letting people believe his BV superstar is Jake. Making him a diss subject on the net for being a homophobic, closeted liar.
The Vice was so popular that Ted added more and more bs, maybe some bs was fed to him that he only later realized was bs. I think Ted is backtracking obviously. That guy's not credible at all.

Anonymous said...

Jake is 100% gay, his bearding for years doesn't lie.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

This is too funny. The lengths some will go to, now trying to convince people that Ted has been spending 5-6 years on a story that he knew was bogus.

What on earth are you doing on a blog that is called Waiting for Toothy? Does that not nullify the being, purpose and existence of the entire blog?

Anonymous said...

Does no one realize there is a baby involved
Ted just killed off the other 4 BT's with those few words.


So how many BTs is there on OMG today? One or more? :)

sk, pg,m,m&m,tom,destiny said...

12!!!!

Anonymous said...

Jake is gay but he's not gay because of Ted or anything Ted says or doesn't say.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Jake was more openly gay back when he was about to come out. He and Austin were seen around town and at parties so it was well known that they were in a relationship. You cant close the closet door after its been ajar for so long. Jake cant risk being seen with Austin because he cant hide the dreamy glow that comes over him when he is with the man he loves. Their chemistry leaps off the page.

Anonymous said...

edibow: Got asked to go to LA tomorrow to interview Jake Gyllenhaal. Currently sobbing into my pillow, I couldn't go. I might drown in my own tears!
about 11 hours

awwww! said...

Jake recently revealed he collects cook books.

“I’ve always loved cooking, probably because my father and other always cooked,” he said.

“I have a massive section in my library at home of beautiful old cook books. I really have a strange obsession with them.”

Anonymous said...

TheInSneider: That said, SOURCE CODE was pretty good. Better than I was expecting. Gyllenhaal is convincing enough to make you overlook some flawed logic.
about 6 hours

Anonymous said...

jennydemilo: RT @hexacorde: If I were Jake Gyllenhaal Id use the "Source Code" togo back in time 8 minutes before he agreed to star in "Prince of Persia"
about 8 hours ago

LOL said...

flaxendoll: Michelle Monaghan says Jake Gyllenhaal is funny and fabulous http://www.blogtopsites.com/p/10040980
about 9 hours

Anonymous said...

RACHELFOX5: Screening Jake Gyllenhaal's new movie SOURCE CODE tonight-shot in Chicago where my family lives!! Looks good....talking to cast this wkend.
about 11 hours ago

review said...

...
It isn’t perfect, though; the exposition – though ably chewed through by the ever-classy Vera Farmiga (as an officer heading up the operation), and Jeffrey Wright (as her superior) – has its moments of creaky unease, and the engagement with the physical plausibility of the scenario inconsistently fleets from an Inception-like detatchment to at times almost explaining too much to us. This extends to an ending that is liable to divide audiences, overzealously reaching beyond what likely would have been a more sobering, memorable ending. Still, that clearly isn’t the film Jones wanted to make, for Source Code stands among an increasingly cynical genre as peculiarly optimistic, detailing his almost romantic fixation with the notions of fate and destiny with disarming inventiveness.

The train crash visual effects are uniformly awful for a film with a $35m budget, but thanks to rock-solid direction and a strong cast – Gyllenhaal is at his best in a while, proving himself a rare actor able to perform well in pretty much every genre now – it was never likely do to less than impress. With a stronger ending Source Code could have been great; as it stands, it’s still a thrilling entertainment destined for cult status.

http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/reviews/review-source-code-satisfies-intellectually-emotionally-with-disarming-inventiveness.php

Ted said...

Dear Ted:
So are Jake Gyllenhaal and Austin Nichols still BFFs, or has that bird flown the coop? I miss seeing the pictures of their combined hotness!
—Dreaming In Dallas

Dear Me Too:
I miss their sweaty BFF shirtless runs, also! Yes, they're still very good friends, but I think somebody's publicist just said tone down the Matthew McConaughey crap, that's all.

Anonymous said...

One photo op every 18 months needs to be tone down?

Anonymous said...

What does "Matthew McConaughey crap" mean?

Anonymous said...

Biking together?

Anonymous said...

Just bumped into McConaughey backstage. He slipped me a flask and said, "Austin, take a pull baby." No lie.
1:57 PM Feb 28th via Twitter for BlackBerry®


^ Tweeted by AUS10 during Academy Awards. Is there a Jaustaloon in da house to decode the secret meaning?

LOL said...

Google "biking together" search - check out pic #3

Anonymous said...

Austin attended the Academy Awards?

Anonymous said...

No, he was joking about it.

Anonymous said...

No, he watched it on TV!

Anonymous said...

I see.

Anonymous said...

Jake has free time after he work as babysitter of children of other man and work as toyboy men of cellulitis and ugly woman!
There are people whose find that to be prostitute men isn’t difficult!
THere are a limit for Jake. They must work as a prostitute when they are young. After that it is very difficult because their sex haven’t power more!

Anonymous said...

I'm sure Jake in still in demand for Hollywood casting couch :)

Anonymous said...

Duncan looked satisfied

Anonymous said...

LOL :)

Anonymous said...

Dear Ted:
So are Jake Gyllenhaal and Austin Nichols still BFFs, or has that bird flown the coop? I miss seeing the pictures of their combined hotness!
—Dreaming In Dallas


Ted has come through with his secret shout-out (bird=grey goose) to his OMG/WFT fans and is telling us they are still together.

Anonymous said...

"Bird" is part of the question, how can that mean anything?

Anonymous said...

Ted writes some of the questions, especially, when he knows his OMG fans will be looking out for the subtle clues and hints.

Anonymous said...

No, he watched it on TV!

I don't have any skin in this game, but I do find it interesting how some posters are so absolutely dead certain when they answer questions about Jake or Austin. My instinct tells me to be very careful of those who continue to act like they have definitive inside information. No one has any idea if Austin Nichols was watching TV or if he was physically in LA at the Academy Awards. What's more intriguing is that he wanted people to think he was there.

Anonymous said...

"Bird" in the question can't only hint that Austin is GG.

Anonymous said...

Ted has come through with his secret shout-out (bird=grey goose) to his OMG/WFT fans and is telling us they are still together.

The person who asked the question was referring to the Goose moniker not Ted.

Anonymous said...

No one has any idea if Austin Nichols was watching TV or if he was physically in LA at the Academy Awards.

Everyone KNOWS that Austin wasn't in LA at the Academy Awards.

«Oldest ‹Older   601 – 800 of 2198   Newer› Newest»