Sean Maher
“I was nervous coming here today because I’ve just never talked about it,” Sean Maher says, while sitting down to chat at Little Dom’s Italian bistro in Los Angeles’ trendy Los Feliz neighborhood, the area where the actor lives with Paul, his partner of nearly nine years, and their two children, Sophia Rose, 4, and Liam Xavier, 14 months. “But, it’s so liberating. It was interesting to be coming to have a conversation that I was always afraid to have.” Despite his trepidation, he adds with a big smile: “This is my coming out ball. I’ve been dying to do this.”
“I’ve never discussed it publicly,” the 36-year-old continues. “I’ve never been asked about it publicly, but I would be lying if I said I didn’t paint a different picture.” Maher says that not coming out wasn’t so much a choice as much as it was a reality of the business when he first came to L.A. fresh out of college back in 1997. Publicists working with him during his first Tinseltown role as the title character on Fox’s short-lived cop drama Ryan Caulfield: Year One assumed he was straight — and he didn’t tell them otherwise, out of fear. “I’m 22, I move to L.A., and it’s such a cliché, but the day I arrive, publicists from the show took me out to The Ivy for lunch,” he remembers. “They’re telling me, ‘You know, gosh, we’d really appreciate it if you could keep your girlfriend on the side because we want to appeal to the female demographic of the show.’”
Granted, Maher could have corrected his handlers, but in that instant, he decided not to. “At that moment, I didn’t think to say, ‘Oh, I’m gay,’ because right before I left New York [where he went to college at NYU], I had my manager tell me: ‘You need to get a girl on your arm or people will start talking.’ I remember telling him: ‘I’m gay.’ He had no idea. And he said: ‘All the more reason to get a girl on your arm.’ My agent was also like, ‘It’s best if you keep your options open. Maybe bisexual?’”
Despite pressure from his manager and agent, both of whom he has since parted ways with, it was ultimately Maher’s decision to stay in the closet, out of concern that he wouldn’t otherwise be able to book leading-man roles. “I kept thinking, This is my first show, I don’t want to get fired,” Maher says. “I’m thinking, What is the potential that if they caught wind that they had cast a gay lead actor that they would fire me? I was young, I was 22. I didn’t know anything. So that sort of started the idea of, okay, well, I’m working a lot, I guess I’ll just keep that gay part of my life on the back burner for now. I went so far as to sleep with women a couple times. It was a very confusing time for me.”
But being in the closet tormented Maher. “It was so exhausting, and I was so miserable,” Maher says. “I didn’t really have any life other than work and this façade I was putting on. So I kept my friends from college [where he was out] separate from my work friends, and that was very confusing. I just kept going on and on painting this picture of somebody I wasn’t. I didn’t have time for a personal relationship anyway. And you just don’t realize that it’s eating away at your soul.”
Although there have been famous cases of homophobia in Hollywood (ex. when Isaiah Washington called fellow actor T.R. Knight a gay slur on the set of ABC’s Grey’s Anatomy and was subsequently fired), Maher says he never encountered much hostility — mostly because he was never out and was very adept at acting straight. “Because I was never out, I was never addressed in a negative way to my face,” Maher says. “Although I witnessed a lot of it, whether it be making fun of gays or gay jokes. I just bit my tongue or looked the other way. That was part of the reason that I didn’t come out earlier — because there was an energy on set, and I felt like my being gay would have offset that, especially with the crew.”
Does Maher regret spending 14 years in the closet professionally? “I don’t think I have regrets,” he responds. “I do believe that sort of this journey took me to the place where I got and I don’t think I would feel so strongly about doing what I’m doing now had I not suffered for the years that I did.”
Having a family is what ultimately what made Maher want to be honest about his sexuality. “I have these beautiful children and this extraordinary family,” Maher says, “and to think in any way shape or form that that’s wrong or that there’s shame in that or that there’s something to hide actually turns my stomach.” Maher kept thinking about what daughter Sophia would say when she realized he was closeted professionally. “What would she think if I said, ‘Oh honey, you can’t come with me to work because they don’t know I have an adopted daughter and they don’t know that I’m gay.’ My children and our family, I’ve really never been as proud of anything in my life. I couldn’t be happier at this point in my life, and I feel like we’ve created this pretty extraordinary family.”
In the end, coming out publicly is what Maher feels he needed to do to tie his life together, personally and professionally. “Creatively, I feel so much more open and free, and I am so happy on The Playboy Club,” he says. “I think it’s because I’ve never been so open on set. All of the relationships that I have off-camera, I never would have allowed five years ago. It feels so liberating.”
Source: 'Playboy Club' star Sean Maher opens up about his sexuality: 'This is my coming out ball'
1,193 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 400 of 1193 Newer› Newest»there are plenty of straight couples who have no interest in getting married. For now anyway.
Although, they CAN!
That's my point.
Hmm, sorry, not sure I get your point.
My point was that argument "There are plenty of people in the gay community who are not interested in marriage, and some are afraid that if gay marriage becomes the norm they will feel pressure to conform" is silly, makes gay people look like immature half wits. Straight people don't marry just because they can and the same is/will be true for all other people.
And it's not just gay couples. There are straight couples that don't want to marry. And there are people who prefer to be or find themselves single. Serial monogamists. People who prefer dating and hookups. People who are in relationships where there are three people, not two.
Not having a subculture where it is okay to not marry hurts these people as well.
Yes, there are certain rights that go with marriage--like getting on a spouse's health insurance. Why should that be limited to married couples? Why not a domestic partner? Why not your sibling if they're living with you and you're helping take care of them?
Destiny really, really loves to play stupid!
One more time.
Marriage is very old institution and it's not going away anytime soon.
The point of marriage equality is equal civil rights for all people.
You can argue that certain rights could or should be redefined, but that doesn't mean that we don't need marriage equality - NOW.
Not having a subculture where it is okay to not marry hurts these people as well.
Straight people, gay people who live in states with gay marriage - it is OK to not marry in USA, I'm certain of that.
if gay marriage becomes the norm they will feel pressure to conform
Now I understand why Jake doesn't support marriage equality - he doesn't want to marry Austin!
With all those BTs one of them should make a honest man out of other one.
I think everyone should have the right to live the way they wish also - but gay people should have the right to marry if they so choose, just like straight people. I don't think that having exercising the same right as anyone else means you'd give up your culture. You have to work at maintaining a cultural visibility, just as ethnic groups have for ages, not to be assimilated to the point where you lose your beautiful uniqueness to the dominant culture. Certain rights do come with marriage.
"I feel that gay people not being able to get married for generations, forever, meant that we came up with alternative ways of recognizing relationships," she told THR. "And I worry that if everybody has access to the same institutions that we lose the creativity of subcultures having to make it on their own. And I like gay culture."
Rachel Maddow is for gay rights if they don't reduce creativity - she loves being entertained. How lovely.
'My Week With Marilyn' Trailer + Michelle Williams Gets Emotional (VIDEO)
SashaHalima Sasha H. Muradali
I just saw Jake Gyllenhaal at my coffee place... pretty eyes, nice hair, he's tall, good taste in coffee.... *le sigh* ah, he's beautiful :D
1 hour ago
IDK, having to make it on your own still says to me that you don't have what the dominant group has. I'd choose equal rights myself.
Just think if women, other ethnic groups, other races didn't have access to the 'same institutions' and had to remain with alternative ways of living. It's a fine line I suppose, but you can't have everything, and it stalls the civil rights process. :(
pappd Pappd.com
Jake Gyllenhaal in Broadway & Canal St http://pappd.com/23958/ #pappd /via @MelissaDPell
8 hours ago
Just think if women, other ethnic groups, other races didn't have access to the 'same institutions' and had to remain with alternative ways of living.
But think how creative that subculture would be! *rolling eyes like crazy*
True, creative subcultures reminds me of the Prohibition era. :(
But there's more harm to come from not having the same rights as others, I think.
And there is absolutely NOTHING in what I said, or Rachel said, that says gay people shouldn't have the right to marry. Gay marriage is a cause I am very passionate about. I've gone to a lot of rallies for gay marriage, called senators to get the gay marriage bill passed in NY, and given money to a lot of organizations that have fought for gay marriage.
Yes, there are certain rights that go with marriage--like getting on a spouse's health insurance. Why should that be limited to married couples? Why not a domestic partner? Why not your sibling if they're living with you and you're helping take care of them?
But not everyone wants marriage--and as I said, not everyone feels that rights should be denied--like access to health care insurance--because you choose not to marry.
And yes, I know what I'm talking about, as someone who has been part of the gay community for many, many years. I also attended a conference a few years back at NYU on this very topic, in which people were expressing these concerns about gay marriage.
Do you know what it is like? I bet you're not even gay.
Since NY passed gay marriage, I have been asked a million times if I'm getting married to my girlfriend (we haven't decided yet). But implicit in that is the assumption that marriage is something everyone should want.
Marriage is a right everyone should have. But it shouldn't be the only alternative, and a lot of gay people enjoy being part of a subculture where it is not expected you get married, or that marriage somehow is the only thing that legitimizes a relationship. That is the idea I was expressing, and the idea that Rachel was also expressing.
You can agree with that idea or not, but to call it anti-gay marriage is just not true.
Wow Michelle seems indeed unbelievable here! do you think that she will be named to the Oscars for the third time?
No idea, bit I LOVE trailer :)
Maddow has, of course, been a staunch supporter of same sex marriage rights. She even incurred some liberal wrath for continuing to note President Obama's opposition to marriage.
Do you know what it is like? I bet you're not even gay.
I bet only you are gay and know what it feels like. Geez.
I think we are all talking about the same thing. Nobody has to feel they have to get married, but the option should be there if they want to, for everyone. Right now, it isn't for some people. Long-term domestic partners too - but it has to be longer than two ships passing in the night, of course. Siblings that take care of one is ill - it still has to be a voluntary decision of one of the partners, which can be done by other means in this case. A life partner is a different thing altogether - the entire life.
Since NY passed gay marriage, I have been asked a million times if I'm getting married to my girlfriend (we haven't decided yet). But implicit in that is the assumption that marriage is something everyone should want.
So what?
Are you saying that you care what other people think about you and your relationship so much that those questions bother you? That you don't have the right answer for them? Maybe you should grow a pair and grow up.
Welcome to the club, straight couples have had the implicit 'marriage and children' question forever. Equality isn't just the good stuff. :)
The career of Michelle is going aloft more and more, and to say that starts with Dawson 's Creek and her it was not even the protagonist! Good job !
Where in any of my comments have I said I am against gay marriage. Seriously. Or that I am bothered by being asked if I'm getting married.
All I was doing was pointing out that it is valid argument for someone to say they have concerns about a loss of a subculture of freedom.
I have absolutely no problem doing what I want, but some people do.
And saying there is nothing wrong with defaulting to marriage is the norm is no different than saying there is nothing wrong with defaulting to heterosexuality as the norm.
Welcome to the club, straight couples have had the implicit 'marriage and children' question forever. Equality isn't just the good stuff. :)
LOL! Good point! :)
All I was doing was pointing out that it is valid argument for someone to say they have concerns about a loss of a subculture of freedom.
What is "subculture of freedom"?
And saying there is nothing wrong with defaulting to marriage is the norm is no different than saying there is nothing wrong with defaulting to heterosexuality as the norm.
More bullshit, you really have a problem with (gay) marriage.
I worry that if everybody has access to the same institutions
I would like to slap her for that. A person without agenda would say "I worry that when everybody has access to the same institutions", not if.
And saying there is nothing wrong with defaulting to marriage is the norm is no different than saying there is nothing wrong with defaulting to heterosexuality as the norm.
Oops! Agenda showing! lol
Leonardo DiCaprio 'dating Australian model Alyce Crawford' just days after splitting from Blake Lively
He's one of Hollywood's hottest heartthrobs, so it's no wonder that Leonardo DiCaprio wasn't single for long.
Just days after splitting from Gossip Girl actress Blake Lively, the Titanic actor has been linked to stunning Australian model Alyce Crawford.
DiCaprio, who has been staying in Sydney while filming The Great Gatsby, is said to have had regular visits from 21-year-old Crawford, a former Australia's Next Top Model contestant, at his hotel.
An insider told Australia's Daily Telegraph newspaper: 'It's been going on about two weeks. He texts her when he wants to see her and they hook up a few times a week.
'They've mostly been meeting up during the week. He does other things on weekends.
'She's been going to his hotel to visit but he is too smart to be seen with her in public.'
But while Crawford denied she was dating DiCaprio, she did describe him as a 'lovely, lovely guy'. She added: 'We have a lot of mutual friends and he seems really nice. We're just friends.'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2045911/Leonardo-DiCaprio-dating-Alyce-Crawford-just-days-splitting-Blake-Lively.html
'They've mostly been meeting up during the week. He does other things on weekends.
He does men on weekends.
I just saw Jake Gyllenhaal at my coffee place...
Jake is enjoying New York kids-free way.
LOL. Some people like putting words in Destiny's mouth as they have noone else to argue with.
That same someone arguing with Destiny about how everyone should get married is probably the same someone who prefers Jake on the down low getting and with a lot of different men
We prefer Jake on the down low as well
And saying there is nothing wrong with defaulting to marriage is the norm is no different than saying there is nothing wrong with defaulting to heterosexuality as the norm.
If and when marriage becomes accepted for all, then this kind of thinking would have a point. As it is, some are putting the cart before the horse, as marriage being available for all is something that is some ways away.
In a way, when marriage for same sex couples becomes so accepted that the inevitable 'when are you going to get married' questions arise, it's a sign of progress, in a way.
A romantic, loving and sexual partnership trumps a sibling relationship, and there's a whole lot more to a marriage than just taking care of the other when they are ill. Taking care of a sick family member shouldn't be dependent on money or what they get for doing it. It's the right thing to do, and there are powers of attorney, health care proxies and other legal means to address these things. One reason that married couples, gay and straight, are entitled to support, health insurance, etc. is that they are a unit, and to ensure that both are cared for in case one of the unit stays at home, becomes, ill, etc.
Where there are bigamy laws, third parties to marriages isn't legal.
LOL. Some people like putting words in Destiny's mouth as they have noone else to argue with.
That same someone arguing with Destiny about how everyone should get married is probably the same someone who prefers Jake on the down low getting and with a lot of different men
Not even a nice try OMG poster - LOL is on you.
LOL is on you Jack.
Whick post is from Jack, 3:22 PM?
3:22pm = OMG jaustaloon. They trot out the tired old "Jack" accusation like clockwork.
the same someone who prefers Jake on the down low getting and with a lot of different men
Why would that be bad? We know that there is no sex with Austin, there are no signs that Jake is in serious relationship with someone else so having sex with different men is most likely true.
The troll didn't stay away for long. He is obviously nervous because gay marriage is slowly being legalized, and troll is scared Jake will marry a man, and not a woman.
Whick post(s) is from the troll, 4:41 PM?
4:41 PM - you are the one who claims that only J&A&BT belivers are JiG believers, right? No balls to speak up?
The troll's head is spinning because Jake was associated with that bathhouse and troll can't explain away the naked men who were steaming up the place.
And saying there is nothing wrong with defaulting to marriage is the norm is no different than saying there is nothing wrong with defaulting to heterosexuality as the norm.
It's quite a bit different when homosexuality becomes part of the norm, if there is such a concept for anyone. Everyone has the right to live how they choose, gay or straight.
Equal protection under the law is just that, equal for all, no extras. There will always be those who don't want to marry, gay or straight.
There's obviously more to it than just who Jake decides to marry, if he does. But for some, what Jake is doing is their entire life I guess.
4:49, where are the posts with the trolls talking about bathhouses? I don't see any. Or is that just in the private blog in your mind?
But for some, what Jake is doing is their entire life I guess.
Yes trolly is here and on OMG 24/7 trying to portray Jake is straight while the gay is staring troll in the face.
The only one expressing nervousness about gay marriage becoming legalized is Destiny. :)
If a gay couple wants other partners, they can do what straight marriages have done for centuries - have an open marriage or have a bit on the side.
Whatever, spin away.
Yes trolly is here and on OMG 24/7 trying to portray Jake is straight while the gay is staring troll in the face.
You are silly liar, no one is talking about straight Jake, theare are no such comments here. Why are you doing that? Why are you hiding?
Nobody has been saying Jake is straight on WFT2 for months. I don't think anyone is on here 24/7 for any reason. The same tired old arguments when they have nothing or noone to attack anymore.
Whatever, spin away.
LOL! Destiny, spinning and playing stupid is your way.
The troll's head is spinning because Jake was associated with that bathhouse and troll can't explain away the naked men who were steaming up the place.
Your head is spinning because Jake is in NYC - and 2 weekends without Austin.
Awwwww, poor J&A believers.
LOL, and another icky woman rotating around him.
Rumored to be anyway. That's what's got them nervous.
Rumored to be anyway.
Dakota Johnson rumored to be new "girlfriend"?
Rumored to be anyway. That's what's got them nervous.
Why would that make anyone nervous? "Girlfriends" are just "girlfriends", nothing new.
oh boys I was looking at Jake and Bear Grylls and him has really surprised me, respect for Jake!
oh boys I was looking at Jake and Bear Grylls and him has really surprised me, respect for Jake!
What surprised you? Hanging out with cute men is Jake's thing :)
tashapadberry Tasha Padberry:)
RT if you think @SophiaBush and @AUS10NICHOLS should make their own version of Mr&Mrs Smith ;)
3 hours ago
Check out this great movie FIVE. October 10th on Lifetime. 9/8c. Five short films. I'm in the first one. @mrskutcher directed mine.
12 hours ago
Jake Gyllenhaal spotting on the way back from lunch with @LCMilstein! And to top it off, we also saw this guy: http://www.government-money-club.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/victorymatt201.gif
16 hours ago
npez nicole pezzolla
Oh yea, I met Jake Gyllenhaal today... He came into the shop and stuff, you know, no biggie.
7 hours ago
gailsaywhattt Gail Andeza Quintos
so Jake Gyllenhaal visited my school and had a q&a with us. nbd.
8 hours ago
BranflakeszXD Brandon Ray Maxwell™
Jack Gyllenhaal came to my school (LaGuardia Arts) todayy!! but I didn't get to see him but he was there to tlk to the drama majors :P.
12 hours ago
What surprised you? Hanging out with cute men is Jake's thing :)
October 07, 2011 4:47 AM
LOL for sure !however,he has been indeed amazing, I didn't believe him so brave,I don't know he has really amazed me
Brave? I wouldn't take my clothes off in that cold weather, but that's TV show, you can bet that they make sure no one is in any real danger. :)
probably is true, however if the compares with the episode of Will Farrel Jake has been great, and then only a really brave man can bear for almost three years the queen of the beards Reese W, I bet that she was more frozen than Iceland!
I don't think Jake cared about the chin being cold bitch, but I'm sure she bored him to tears! lol
it is the same effect that do me the movie of her ;)
PoP and reeking - what a tremendous waste of precious time...
Yes he is the world champion of absurd and wrong choices, and when you think that there cannot be of worse here that Tylor Swift arrives.........
LOL :)
Jack Gyllenhaal came to my school (LaGuardia Arts) todayy!! but I didn't get to see him but he was there to tlk to the drama majors
Awwww! I bet OMG loves this tweet.
The father of James Franco is dead: ( R.i.P. Mister Franco
Poor Mr Franco and his family.
dreamwrit3r Marian
I picked Jake Gyllenhaal to win #SCREAMSciFiActor at the 2011 @SPIKE_TV #SCREAMAwards. http://shar.es/b3Bbh
1 hour ago
misstaylorcast Miss. Taylor Cast
I've seen Jake Gyllenhal every day some I've been back in NY. I get my coffee, see him & start my day. @amyjojohnson99
23 hours ago
jackiedjenkins Jackie Jenkins
Love that I live in a city where I can walk right past the gorgeous Jake Gyllenhal on my lunch break.
4 hours ago
Bexmo Becky Morris Knight
And we watched Source Code with Jake Gyllenhall. Enjoyable sci-fi-ish nonsense for a while, then spoiled by a random happy ever after ending
6 hours ago
carolinehwang Caroline Hwang
today in the city: being called "ching-ling," seeing Jake Gyllenhall (buff!), passing a man w/ a crazed look w/ bloody mouth and hands. NYC!
22 hours ago
She (Rachel Maddow) was NOT making a personal statement, she was making a statement about how equality will harm our "diversity." That's an incomprehensible and reprehensible statement. As I've already stated, this romantic notion that "gay culture" somehow liberates us from the "tyranny of heterosexuality" is a mentality informed by internalized homophobia. She's bought into her own oppression. If the society can convince you that discrimination is actually good for you, then they don't have to do much to keep you down...you'll do it to yourself. This is a perfect example of how oppression works successfully. You must have some collusion by the oppressed to keep them oppressed; in order to get that collusion, you have to convince them that they're better off being oppressed.
Maddow has completely bought into it. Gay marriage equality doesn't threaten gay people in any way...it EMPOWERS us. Freedom is freedom and slavery is slavery. Slavery is NOT freedom. To suggest that we are freer because we are being oppressed is classic internalized self-loathing. It's ridiculous. Anyone with the tiniest bit of political consciousness knows that having more choices doesn't "ruin" freedom, it enhances it. We cannot be fully assimilated because we do not fit the "norm" as it is defined in this society. We "deviate" from it by our very existences. We will not melt into a community of Stepford gays. To suggest THAT is to also suggest that feminists are oppressing women by fighting for their liberation, and that Martin Luther King Jr. was harming people of color by championing their rights. It takes the truth and turns it completely on its head.
I would ask Maddow..."So the women's movement has created less freedom for women by fighting for their equal inclusion in all of society's institutions...is that correct?" Because, in essence, that's what she's saying. Women have MORe freedom today because of the fight for equality, not LESS. The same is true for all groups who have battled society for a place at the table. It's not about getting "absorbed", it's about being lifted up from the ghetto. Oppression is NOT freedom, no matter how much queer activists try to suggest otherwise. I agree with them to the extent that I think we should celebrate the clever and effective strategies we devised to survive being made into second class citizens.BUT we cannot live in this ghetto forever pretending that being oppressed is "liberation." The goal always has to be the right to more choices, greater freedom, and a capacity to be included as equals in whatever way we choose. To suggest that we are 'better off' being persecuted is insanity. And that is what she's suggesting. There's no "rush" for equality because we are somehow better off being oppressed. Bullshit.
This explains why Jake is so often seen in NYC subway :)
Awwwwwwww :)
I think what Rachel is saying Homosexuals don't have to live like Heterosexuals do. So we adopt all their traditions. No thanks. I relish being diverse at this point in my life.
How can marriage equality or having same civil rights as the rest of the world make you change your way of living or change you? It can't. But would help millions of gay people feel better about themselves and improve their lives.
I think what Rachel is saying Homosexuals don't have to live like Heterosexuals do.
WTF?! Why would anyone in the right mind think that having the same rights means that gays should / would live like heterosexuals or adopt their traditions?
Legally I do agree Gays should have all the rights everyone else does. I am just not a big fan of feeling I have to adopt to all Hetero traditions.
How can marriage equality or having same civil rights as the rest of the world make you change your way of living or change you? It can't. But would help millions of gay people feel better about themselves and improve their lives.
October 07, 2011 5:33 PM
holy words!
I am just not a big fan of feeling I have to adopt to all Hetero traditions.
I wish you would stop and think about what REALLY bothers you, because you aren't making sense.
dvdinfatuation Dave B.
Both Leonardo DiCaprio and Jake Gyllenhaal turned down the lead role in this film - http://bit.ly/h9EIFl
4 hours ago
MIKEJAGGERR JAGUAR CROWN
Just had a random conversation with Jake Gyllenhall on the 1 train....#RandomNYCshit
42 minutes ago
http://twitter.com/#!/MIKEJAGGERR
Music Artist/Producer & Director.
MeganKBowen says – reply to this
28I don't know about the two of them lunching together. But Jake is ridiculously self-absorbed, vain, and rude. So all of you girls who think he's such a sweet, hot guy would be very disappoint to know how full of himself he is IRL. And how he treats other people that he feels are "below" him (basically everyone). My friend and I met him and Adam Levine (through our promoter friend) at a hole in the wall pub. We didn't even ask to be introduced. I have a BF, and the promoter just thought Adam or Jake would be interested in my single friend. Well, Adam was very talkative and sweet. We went to his place for an afterparty. Jake said maybe an entire 20 words the entire 20 minutes. Adam was incredibly nice. Jake barely acknowledged us, then later had the nerve to call his friend for MY friend's phone number! (at 3AM…hmm, wonder what he was calling about!)…thank God she turned him down. I all but begged her not to go and so glad she didn't. He's a stuck-up prick, and his sister is a stuck-up bitch. I love Maggie's acting, but that's the truth. Hopefully none of you ever have the misfortune of meeting him.
from Perez
Anonymous said...
I am just not a big fan of feeling I have to adopt to all Hetero traditions.
I wish you would stop and think about what REALLY bothers you, because you aren't making sense.
I know what bothers me. The Hetero word has always made me feel like I was different. Now I am happy with who I am and don't feel like I need approval or to be more like the so called normal hetero folks;-)
word = world
That is susch a BS story. Just some fabricated Jake is not a nice person but most definetly straight because he wanted the friends number at 3am in the morning. What a joke.
Looks like you resent heterosexuals so much that you can't think straight.
MeganKBowen says...
Thanks for a laugh!
Tom, looks like you resent heterosexuals so much that you can't think straight.
I knew that would have made you laugh! for this I have posted it! they think that we are all idiots and we believe in every shit that they tell us!
I understand the uneasy feelings about marriage . We fought for ages for the right to be different and now it's like "shut up ab behave like a good little straight guy/girl"
9:30 PM - that's insane bullshit.
Gays are their own worst enemy.
Anonymous said...
Tom, looks like you resent heterosexuals so much that you can't think straight.
I don't blame Tom for the resentments and don't blame him for not thinking straight.. He is Gay.
So gays shouldn't be reasonable and have common sense?
now it's like "shut up ab behave like a good little straight guy/girl"
LOL! What's next, you are going to say that marriage equality will force gays to have kids and get fat like most married men?
And no clubbing and no queening!
violetxoxox V for Violet ✿
I watched half of Prince Of Persia: The Sands Of Time going "My GOD he looks exactly like Jake Gyllenhaal. It's uncanny!" And then ... d'oh!
5 hours ago
FailureFoundMe Cecilia
Oh my fucking god. This is a rip off of Aladdin and The Mummy. Whatthefuckingshit
10 hours ago
Well now, that was a really fucking awkward kiss. Jake Gyllenhaal, stick to men.
9 hours ago
lailysamadi Laily Mesbah Samadi
Oh just having lunch with @PoojaMerai and Jake Gyllenhal @ Angelica's kitchen #nobiggie
16 hours ago
lailysamadi Laily Mesbah Samadi
@ @lisalang9 well technically he was sitting at the table next to us. If you want to get really technical :)
6 hours ago
caseyfphoto Casey Fatchett
Just rode the 3 train with Jake Gyllenhal. Why you staring man? I know I'm good looking!
17 hours ago
October 6 - Enjoying A Smoothie At Organic Avenue In NYC
Big smile for cute guy :)
in my country Source Code is in head in the sales of the of the DVDs BR
DUH!!!
Big smile for cute guy
A-ha! Jake is buying food for BTs!!!
Yes, PG will be ecstatic about this, lol.
Three Musketeers in 3D - World Premiere - After Party - Luke Evans posing with his beard
What hetero tradtions are striking such fear in your hearts?
The social recognition and respect that comes with marriage, children and family if you so choose, wearing of wedding rings, all are human traditions. I think the benefits outweigh the risks. You can still be different.
Gay marriage laws don't come with a mandate that orders you to conform to a so-called heterosexual norm in order to participate, or the offer is null and void. What is a heterosexual norm or tradition anyway?
Luke Evans should be in the dictionary under definitions for pitiful.
destiny said...
Luke Evans should be in the dictionary under definitions for pitiful.
ITA. He is a joke.
The stand-in girlfriend has become an essential PR prop for Hollywood stars.
'Oh my God. Isn’t that…?” My friend – visiting from London – is staring at the film star who’s just walked into the bar we’re drinking in. “It is… I’m sure it is. Isn’t it?” It is, I tell her. She loves him, she simpers, always has. That last action film he starred in? Genius. And suddenly her expression changes. “Who’s the guy he’s with? Is that…?” His boyfriend? Yes, I nod.
It took me a while to get used it, too. When you come from a country where owning a Yentl DVD is enough to condemn a public figure to a vigorous interrogation on the subject of his sexuality, it’s hard to come to terms with some of the most famous “womanising” hard men of Hollywood blithely wandering around town with their gay partners.
There’s an “open secret” attitude out here that one US journalist friend describes as “more respectful and less pernicious than the mentality you guys have in the UK”. Journalists get blackballed for hinting at the question, much less asking it, so no one does. When a closeted star engages in a bout of “couch-jumping” about a pretty new conquest during an interview, we smile and we nod, while being fully aware that it’s all bilge.
My lofty US counterpart’s stance (“whose business is it, anyway?”) would carry more weight if it weren’t for the series of stand-in “girlfriends” paraded up and down the red carpet by these stars. Their private life is our business, it seems, when it’s big business, and in the industry these girls are considered to be necessary PR props. Necessary because – as one Hollywood agent told me early on – “for all our bias-free pretences, ambition still trumps a desire to be 'out and proud’ in showbusiness. After all, can you think of any major stars who are out?” Failing to come up with a single example, I had to concede the point.
What’s baffling is why it should be quite so hard for a modern audience to watch, say, an actor they know to be gay playing a straight man. Actors do pretend to be other people for a living. As Jean-Luc Godard said: “The cinema is halfway. We go halfway and the audience meets us halfway.” Perhaps now that we know so much about the stars on our screens – from their surgeries and various spiritualities to the number of their adopted children – halfway is too big a leap for us to make.
Tell someone you’re an actor out here and there’s only one response: “Oh – so which restaurant do you work in?” LA is a “slasher” town: you’re nobody unless you’ve got a couple of slashes breaking up your job description. There are the obvious combos (model/actress, waiter/musician, successful actor/execrable artist) and the jarring ones (driving instructor/herbalist, English literature professor/music video choreographer) but nobody with an ounce of self-respect would confine themselves to the one job.
Increasingly aware of this, I’ve started prefixing my one‑word job description with “just a…” before hastily adding: “And I have no dreams or aspirations of any kind.” Not really a winner in terms of sparkling self-introductions, is it?
-------------------
Some advice for Amanda Knox’s lawyer. First, avoid telling US TV networks that your client “has a great appreciation of how worldwide this story is”. Second, try – just try – to stop the 24-year-old from smiling at the cameras.
I realise this will be hard. Mesmerised by the lens from the moment one was first pointed at her in the wake of her flatmate’s murder four years ago, Knox is a perfect example of a new generation of young women who instinctively know how to play the media. Girls with vigorous sexual appetites – as one might describe her without implying any kind of murderous guilt – show a particular aptitude for this. She is, as one friend says wryly, “from the school of hard Knox”.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/8811241/Hollywoods-gay-stars-parade-their-open-secrets.html
in my wretch country (Italy) there is no anybody law that the rights of the gay protect, it is not possible to marry or to cohabit with rights legal insureds, if even one of the partners is sick the other he cannot go in the hospital to find him without the permission of the family of blood of the sick, if unfortunately one of the partners dies and he leaves for will to the other the house or the patrimony that shared for the Italian law it is not valid and any blood's relative also a cousin of fifth degree can grasp the will and the law will agree with him around two months ago our parliament and government (whose head he doesn't make scruple to pass his evenings accompanied by clandestine prostitutes and minor and to organize varied orgies with minor and cocaine) has rejected a law that the aggravating circumstance of omofobia founded in the crimes of aggression against the gay, that unfortunately from us they are in growth, we are perhaps the only country in Europe without a law account the omofobia or that the unions of fact you legalize among homosexuals. Whoever allows him to devalue or the civil rights of the gay to make banal in name of the charm of a suppository subculture or liberty of choice is for me an idiot and an egoist! sorry for my bad English I hope to be explains me the same .
When a closeted star engages in a bout of “couch-jumping” about a pretty new conquest during an interview, we smile and we nod, while being fully aware that it’s all bilge.
You go girl!
Whoever allows him to devalue or the civil rights of the gay to make banal in name of the charm of a suppository subculture or liberty of choice is for me an idiot and an egoist!
Rachel Maddow is a rich woman who can afford to be more concerned about gay subculture creativity than ordinary gay people's living.
all of us should be united in the struggle of the conquest of new rights among which to choose this is for me the true liberty I don't know this lady that will surely have all of her worths, but why it doesn't come in my country and it tries her to rent a house or to have a stable contract of job or only to walk for the road hand in the hand with the person that loves and with which would like to build a shared life in the respect of the laws and the others, but it is not you granted, and every day is a humiliation or a compromise if you are lucky?
There is nothing wrong with equal rights for gay people, no bad "side effects" of marriage equality. At least no one made any reasonable argument about it.
but if you make them banal or you diminish besides the value of it in the name of stupidities as " the charm of a subculture " from a privileged position, you implicitly attach them, and according to me this is stupid and dangerous.
Necessary because – as one Hollywood agent told me early on – “for all our bias-free pretences, ambition still trumps a desire to be 'out and proud’ in showbusiness. After all, can you think of any major stars who are out?” Failing to come up with a single example, I had to concede the point.
Not in screen film. Not a one.
11:49 AM - I agree with you, that's why I'm saying that there are NO bad "side effects" of marriage equality.
The studios are setting the rules. They will not hire Gay men. Of course you are not gonna see that written in any contract but it is a fact. Gay men who are screen actors choose to stay closeted because they will not get work, money or fame. Pure and simple.
I used to think it may be about personal safety but it is not. There are other huge stars in television and music. I haven't seen any issues with safety ever. Why would screen actors be different.
ambition still trumps a desire to be 'out and proud’ in showbusiness
Yep, Luke Evans is the latest example of how far that can go.
Neil Patrick Harris gay declared of success
Neil Patrick Harris is a TV star and he was TV series star at the time he was pushed out of the closet.
P.S. And he's doing comedy - people have less problem with accepting funny gay guys.
The Smurfs is it a film for the cinema of success, and then who has pushed him out of the closet without his consent?
Zachary Quinto doesn't seem me hides too much his sexuality
Yes, but just like no one watched The Lord of the Rings to see Ian McKellen, no one took their kids to see Neil Patrick Harris in The Smurfs - he's not the star of the movie, he's not important for movie success.
Just like Sam Worthington wasn't important for Avatar and didn't become a movie star after all that publicity and box office.
Zachary Quinto doesn't seem me hides too much his sexuality
He doesn't have fake girlfriends, but he's still in the closet.
he is the protagonist "human" of the movie, and nobody has had problems to bring their children to see a movie with a declared gay therefore it is worth double ,and for o me it is important part of the success of the movie
Sorry, I think you are wrong about that.
Perez pushed NPH out of the closet by threatning to post stuff about his ex-boyfriends who were willing to go on record. Perez claimed to know them.
Sam Worthington has made CotT that has had success and for me he has not become a star because it is too much of low stature
Perez pushed NPH out of the closet by threatning to post stuff about his ex-boyfriends who were willing to go on record. Perez claimed to know them.
October 08, 2011 12:32 PM
I didn't know it! there has been once when Perez was still a free man
Sam Worthington is an OK actor without movie star qualities.
He doesn't have fake girlfriends, but he's still in the closet.
he often makes him see with the boy of Glee that is declared gay, and everybody knows that are together, he doesn't declare that it is gay but it doesn't even deny it and a brave behavior seems me and also with a certain class.
Perez pushed NPH out of the closet by threatning to post stuff about his ex-boyfriends who were willing to go on record.
And then NPH's PR person denied Neil is gay, but he came out few days(?) after that.
Sam Worthington is an OK actor without movie star qualities.
October 08, 2011 12:37 PM
Amen !
he doesn't declare that it is gay but it doesn't even deny it and a brave behavior seems me and also with a certain class
That is much, much better than posing with fake girlfriends, but it's still the closet.
And thean NPH's PR person denied Neil is gay
October 08, 2011 12:41 PM
these PR of HW they do more damages of the hurricanes
PR people work for actors so they don't make decisios on their own.
I presume Neil tried to deny being gay via PR person, but changed his mind shortly after.
Gay = lonely and sad existence , got out of that lifestyle and feel much better
And yet not lonely and sad enough to to stay away but to seek out gay-themed blogs?
I dunno about you once being gay but you do have a new attribute: being a tool!
That is much, much better than posing with fake girlfriends, but it's still the closet.
yes but his behavior speaks alone, it doesn't have need to say it, it is as if he said : I am this thought and to do what you want I don't change and I don't hide me. it is of fact a to come out
PR people work for actors so they don't make decisios on their own.
I presume Neil tried to deny being gay via PR person, but changed his mind shortly after.
October 08, 2011 12:52 PM
I am not sure ,for me it is a fifty fifty of guilts
yes but his behavior speaks alone, it doesn't have need to say it
Yes, he does have to say it. Until he mentiones his gayness or his boyfriend he'll be in the closet as far as his public is concerned.
Regarding gay marrage my biggest bugbear has always been thus: how on EARTH can you call yourself a civilised, fair society and have one set of taxpaying, law-abiding citizens able to marry and the other set of taxpaying, law-abiding citizens unable to marry?
How can one set of people have a basic marital legal right but the other set cannot, even if they are born in that country, work there all their lives, never break the law, be entrepreneurial and pay more taxes into that country than their straight, welfare-drawing, pop out ten kiddies children types (I'm looking at you Baby Tile!) and yet remain held back because...some guy MIGHT HAVE walked on water a 2,000 years ago.
But we all know he didn't.
I am not sure ,for me it is a fifty fifty of guilts
Actors aren't retarded, they are capable of making their own choices. PR people and management do their best to keep actors in the closet (to make more money), but in the end it is actor's decision to be openly gay or not.
NPH...he made no comment during Perez' rampage. The his PR person said he was not gay and NPH came out and said no, I am gay.
I'm sure PR person didn't say "NPH isn't gay" without NPH's knowledge and agreement. PR is hired and paid by actors, they don't work on their own.
Because there is no way NPH and his PR person didn't discuss what to do during Perez' rampage time.
Yes, he does have to say it. Until he mentiones his gayness or his boyfriend he'll be in the closet as far as his public is concerned.
October 08, 2011 1:02 PM
it seems to me a judgment an a little too much rigid, for a person how rigid it is not at all it and that it seems so much calm with his sexuality not to be owed to do a matter of discussion of it, at times a gesture is worth more than thousand words
Maybe it was all carefully planned.
at times a gesture is worth more than thousand words
No, it isn't.
He's public figure and by staying in the closet Zachary Quinto's indirect message is "gay is not OK, hide it".
Actors aren't retarded, they are capable of making their own choices. PR people and management do their best to keep actors in the closet (to make more money), but in the end it is actor's decision to be openly gay or not.
for me it depends on the importance of the actor there are some stars as Jhonny Depp that they are practically an industry, I imagine me how many pressures and affairs you go to touch, in these cases the PR are fundamental, it is different for a less important actor, in that case it depends more from him and from his courage
Jhonny Depp that they are practically an industry, I imagine me how many pressures and affairs you go to touch
So what? He's still just an actor, someone who can be easily replaced.
He's public figure and by staying in the closet Zachary Quinto's indirect message is "gay is not OK, hide it".
October 08, 2011 1:23 PM
it doesn't seem me really the message of ZQ. its message seems more being: I do what I want and I don't hide me you do as many have the courage! The to come out can also have different forms
for me it depends on the importance of the actor
= depends on the money an actor can make. Hollywood feels the same!
So what? He's still just an actor, someone who can be easily replaced.
October 08, 2011 1:27 PM
ah for certain, my grandmother says "all are useful anybody is essential" there are however pieces an a little more difficult to replace
I do what I want and I don't hide me you do as many have the courage! The to come out can also have different forms
Zachary Quinto is in the closet, hiding his boyfriends,his relationships = "gay is not OK" message. There is only one (right) way to come out for a public figure - to acknowledge the gayness. Doesn't matter if that's on some TV show, magazine or book - he / she has to say it, to acknowledge it.
= depends on the money an actor can make. Hollywood feels the same!
yes I wanted to exactly say this, it is not correct and certain I don't like it rather to say the truth it is quite a lot bleak however it is this way
"all are useful anybody is essential" there are however pieces an a little more difficult to replace
Johnny Depp is just an actor, there wouldn't be need to replace him - he's not a Nobel prize winner or Steve Jobs.
Zachary Quinto is in the closet, hiding his boyfriends,his relationships = "gay is not OK" message. There is only one (right) way to come out for a public figure - to acknowledge the gayness. Doesn't matter if that's on some TV show, magazine or book - he / she has to say it, to acknowledge it.
October 08, 2011 1:38 PM
who has imposed this rule? I don't Know, for me it is too much drastic, How is it able what you say more important being of that that you do? don't have need to declare what you are if you already behave you as that
who has imposed this rule?
Gay people.
How is it able what you say more important being of that that you do?
Zachary Quinto does NOT behave as openly gay man.
Johnny Depp is just an actor, there wouldn't be need to replace him - he's not a Nobel prize winner or Steve Jobs.
October 08, 2011 1:43 PM
yes is that of which we are speaking, actors and coming out not Nobel or Steve Jobs God blesses him, in its field JD is a piece from ninety as the various Nobel prizes are in theirs therefore difficult to replace
Johnny Depp is an entertainer, not doing anything important for the world, not changing lives or the way we live and work.
1:58 PM - I think you are blinded by money Johnny Depp is making.
who has imposed this rule?
Gay people.
October 08, 2011
what? and how has they done? are they gathered in a conference as the doctors? and why nobody has told me? I wanted my nameplate of recognition;) you cannot speak for everybody, some person gay will think it so some other no , for me we have to be more elastic in to decode the behaviors every person it has its ways and its times
in reality it doesn't care a lot of it of J D and of how many money he succeeds in doing. and I know that he has not done anything of main point for the humanity apart perhaps to save Vanessa Paradis from general forgetfulness, mine was only an example to say that there am coming out more difficult than others to HW according to your importance I could say Will Smitt or Leo
Anonymous said...
Zachary Quinto is in the closet, hiding his boyfriends,his relationships = "gay is not OK" message. There is only one (right) way to come out for a public figure - to acknowledge the gayness. Doesn't matter if that's on some TV show, magazine or book - he / she has to say it, to acknowledge it.
ITA.
Have you posted the same message twice?
but how you do to say that he hides if it spends that whole time (to the light of the sun) alone with a man avowedly gay of his age? does he perhaps consider us intelligent enough not to have to add other?
what? and how has they done? are they gathered in a conference as the doctors?
Actors are PUBLIC FIGURES.
but how you do to say that he hides if it spends that whole time (to the light of the sun) alone with a man avowedly gay of his age? does he perhaps consider us intelligent enough not to have to add other?
People have opinions about his behaviour and sexuality and those are just opinions and speculations until ZQ comes out.
in reality it doesn't care a lot of it of J D and of how many money he succeeds in doing. and I know that he has not done anything of main point for the humanity apart perhaps to save Vanessa Paradis from general forgetfulness, mine was only an example to say that there am coming out more difficult than others to HW according to your importance I could say Will Smitt or Leo
You are talking about money again.
It would be harder for them to come out because they would lose more money than some TV actor.
what? and how has they done? are they gathered in a conference as the doctors?
Actors are PUBLIC FIGURES.
I don't understand the point, actors are certain public figures but every one will be different from the' other. How there can be a golden rule that is worth for everybody? it is a few rigid for me
How there can be a golden rule that is worth for everybody?
Same rule for all gay people.
I don't understand the point, actors are certain public figures but every one will be different from the' other.
That doesn't matter. There is only one way to be openly gay if you are a public figure - you let them know.
Post a Comment