Wednesday, 18 May 2011

Quick PR lesson

Quick PR lesson for closeted celebrities!

FAKE photo GOOD for your public image:



FAKE photo BAD for your public image - Call a lawyer as soon as possible!

2,181 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   801 – 1000 of 2181   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

Jake has not make this passage yet

You make it sound like being part of a great movie and doing a great role is a bad thing for Jake and his career.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Another reason for Jake to be happy he was lucky enough to be offered the role.

How Jake could know that BBMt woul have become all this? He is been just brave to accept to closed box.

Anonymous said...

I was right: you are ignorant or you never watch gay themed movies or you just play dumb. First tent scene is fantastic, but people who watch movies know that there isn't anything "graphic" or "pushed the boundaries" about it.

Look dumb person, I've watched and own gay theme movies. Speak for yourself will you. Many would not see BBM because of the sex scenes. Now you can pretend to act as if gay sex (mild love scenes or agreesive sex scenes) are totally excepted by the masses and the movie going public, but you'll be in for a rude awakening. Just because you may be gay or I may be gay does not mean judgemental, prudish, purist, assholes share you veiw. Don't holler or get mad at me because of this. You seem to be some gay person who lives in a bubble of totally gayness and nothing else. Well, straights need to get over it because they are living with gay people and lifesytle and sheltered gays who live an all things gay lifestyle hopefully realized that they are living among straights who do not neccessarily share their views, and mostly about sex, gay sex, let alone gay sex scenes.

Anonymous said...

There was nothing brave about it - Jake had nothing to lose by doing BBMt + he was offered to work with a great director and great script, that much he knew for sure in 2004.

Anonymous said...

How Jake could know that BBMt woul have become all this? He is been just brave to accept to closed box.

There was nothing brave about it - Jake had nothing to lose by doing BBMt + he was offered to work with a great director and great script, that much he knew for sure in 2004.

Anonymous said...

Many would not see BBM because of the sex scenes.

So what???? That doesn't make BBMt sex scenes "graphic" or "pushed the boundaries".

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

You make it sound like being part of a great movie and doing a great role is a bad thing for Jake and his career.

Of course not,but I wish that he goes on and make more better in his career.

Anonymous said...

Bradley Cooper's Gay Sex Scene

From "Wet Hot American Summer", 2001

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Trolly, why are YOU here?

Anonymous said...

There was nothing brave about it - Jake had nothing to lose by doing BBMt + he was offered to work with a great director and great script, that much he knew for sure in 2004 He was offered also to play in The dreamers of Bernardo Bertolucci,other great director and good script ,surely less risk than BBMt,but him chose however BBMt

Anonymous said...

"The Dreamers" is a bad movie, Jake's decision was good.

Anonymous said...

"surely less risk than BBMt"

Jake was expected to show his dick in "The Dreamers", I wouldn't do it either.

Anonymous said...

speaking of Bradley Cooper,last week in my country has gone out The hangover 2,racommended me to go to see it? I know is out of topic but I wanted one suggestion of yours..... wise members of WFT;)

Anonymous said...

surely less risk than BBMt"

Jake was expected to show his dick in "The Dreamers", I wouldn't do it either.

WHY NOT?

Anonymous said...

Dear 2:07 PM

My answer would be no,don't go to see it.Rent Bachelor Party with a still cute Tom Hanks

Anonymous said...

WHY NOT?

Because there wasn't a good reason to do that in the movie and Hollywood actors shoudn't show their dicks just like that, America isn't ready.

Anonymous said...

thanks for having answered me,Tom Hanks WTF doing in that movie?

Anonymous said...

Not that movie, old movie called "Bachelor Party".

Anonymous said...

Because there wasn't a good reason to do that in the movie and Hollywood actors shoudn't show their dicks just like that, America isn't ready haaa OK I didn't know it ,I am European.

Anonymous said...

My answer would be no,don't go to see it.Rent Bachelor Party with a still cute Tom Hanks
oooh I'm sorry I had not understood anything,I will surely look at it! thanks for the suggestion :)

Anonymous said...

Bradley Cooper's Gay Sex Scene

Well? :)

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
destiny said...

You were the one that said Jake has problems because of BBM, not me. You're the one insisting that it has nothing to do with Jake himself, and everything to do with a role he took.

Since you don't seem to have seen anything but BBM with a gay sex scene, here's a few examples for you:

Peter Saarsgaard shows everything in Kinsey and has a sex scene with Liam Neeson. Didn't hurt their careers.

The sex scene in I Love You Phillip Morris makes the sex scene in BBM look PG-rated.

Peter S. again in the Dying Gaul, getting fucked on a boardroom table and crying while being jerked off. Yes it's an indie film, but so was BBM, no one expected it to become mainstream.

Zachary Quinto on stage in Angels in America in a pretty explicit sex scene.

Speaking of Quinto, he has been seen at gay events, including rallies against Prop 8 and the Gay Pride Parade last summer with Jonathan Groff. For better or worse, he did a "It Gets Better" video (not sure I think someone still in the closet should have done it).

Anderson Cooper, like all journalists, does not do anything publicly that would be considered political, it's a prohibition put on all journalists.

Anonymous said...

Because there wasn't a good reason to do that in the movie and Hollywood actors shoudn't show their dicks just like that, America isn't ready. And then that scene in LAOD where you can seen a thing that seems a junk to me?

Anonymous said...

And then that scene in LAOD where you can seen a thing that seems a junk to me?

You can't see his junk in LAOD, but you can in Jarhead if you look really hard, lol.

Anonymous said...

You can't see his junk in LAOD, but you can in Jarhead if you look really hard, lol.

In which sense really hard? ;)

Anonymous said...

Oh 4:10 nobody here cares about Jarhead; no explicit ghey sex.

Anonymous said...

Oh 4:10 nobody here cares about Jarhead; no explicit ghey sex.

well straight to the point!

Anonymous said...

In which sense really hard? ;)

You have to freez the picture in the right moment :)

Anonymous said...

Ok then I know what I will do tonight! What a pathetic life do I have?;)

Anonymous said...

Destiny none of those examples equal the success, the major push and the major attention that BBM generated. Let's not talk about Academy nominations, attention and spotlight it cast on the two lead stars in. With those films you mentioned you are talking apples and oranges here. Hardly anybody saw or know of those films. I do. But most would who are not gay would say, I've never heard of those movies. BBM is etched in our society and will be forever remembered as groundbreaking.

Jake did wonderful in his role and although he did not win the top award, he won one of them and he DESERVED it. I don't care whatever your biases towards Jake are, and believe me, you wear them on your sleeve, just because he has not pleased you with (his LIFE) choices and decision.
It still does not take away the facts that most stars who were asked to play the role turned it down for whatever reasons. Jake didn't when asked. And the reasons for most actors for turning it down was mentioned many places I've read in the past. I still don't think Heath would have taken the Jack role if he was offered it because of the sex scene.
As someone stated earlier, the negatives impact of Jake taking that role was there and is still here for the most part. A prime example is, People still screaming that he's gay and bearding who act as if they know him personally when they don't. Then other dummys follow. Regardless if he's str8, gay, or bi. He deserves respect and should not have to meet others expectations because he performed in an iconic movie with a profound social statement.

Jake said...

Ok then I know what I will do tonight! What a pathetic life do I have?;)

You won't be disappointed!

Anonymous said...

As someone stated earlier, the negatives impact of Jake taking that role was there and is still here for the most part. A prime example is, People still screaming that he's gay and bearding who act as if they know him personally when they don't.

An adult should be embarrassed to post bullshit like that.

Anonymous said...

Jake said...
You won't be disappointed!

promised .... promised.....;)

Anonymous said...

I still don't think Heath would have taken the Jack role if he was offered it because of the sex scene.

Of course Heath would do it, there is nothing special about it.

Check out that video - Bradley Cooper had no problem being a bottom in 2001, in much more explicit gay sex scene.

Anonymous said...

5:03 PM = silly, homophobic fangirl screaming that people who think Jake is gay don't know him, but never ever mentions that fangirls don't know Jake either.

Anonymous said...

An adult should be embarrassed to post bullshit like that.

^^^ but only a narrow minded self centered person who can't see things for what they really are would fool themselves to think otherwise because it allows them to continue their self righteousness of trying to out someone they don't know because..

Anonymous said...

5:18 PM - I KNOW that Jake Gyllenhaal bearded with Reese Witherspoon and Taylor Swift. 100% sure. Deal with that.

Anonymous said...

P.S. 5:18 PM - Your homophobia is your problem, keep hating gayness and gays.

Anonymous said...

to 5:03 PM these words for me should be engraved in the stone.

Anonymous said...

5:27 PM = homophobic troll talking to himself.

Anonymous said...

Jake Gyllenhaal bearded with Reese Witherspoon and Taylor Swift. 100% sure. And not to forget to say that he has very probably killed Kenny! ugly bastard!

Anonymous said...

5:03 PM / 5:27 PM - cheap publicity whores don't deserve respect. Being lucky to get a role in a movie like BBMt doesn't change anything.

Anonymous said...

for me everybody deserve respect also those that have a different thought from mine!

Anonymous said...

Bradley Cooper is a big ole sloppy bottom, letting old men fuck him any chance he gets.

Everyone in HW knows this.

Anonymous said...

5:03 PM / 5:27 PM - cheap publicity whores don't deserve respect. Being lucky to get a role in a movie like BBMt doesn't change anything.

You are just a taleban.You don't want to think you don't want to see and certain you don't want to ask you questions that your certainties graze.You don't be able to have a discussion, you are just able to impose your truth that is above all a hope.

Anonymous said...

From an earlier discussion: Levine is a name that is descended from the priest class in ancient Israel and Judaism. A very beautiful name and a very beautiful history. So while I am sure no harm was meant, it isn't respectful to play games with with people's surnames.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
prairiegirl said...

Levine is a name that is descended from the priest class in ancient Israel and Judaism. A very beautiful name and a very beautiful history. So while I am sure no harm was meant, it isn't respectful to play games with with people's surnames.


Okay, so 18:50, you can speak directly to me since I am the referenced party in this comment. So let me see if I have this right: it's okay to hack personally at fellow bloggers that you are actually talking to but Latrine is hands-off? Adam Levine is untouchable. 18:50, can you tell me where the respect has been when someone gets told to 'go back to OMG', 'jaustaloon', pee gee (Gee Whiz, what do you think that is a reference to?) is 'dumber than a box of hair', 'needs to take their meds', etc.? I haven't seen anyone jumping to the defense of the targeted blogger when this tampering has been going on.

You know why? Because this is a blog and WFT2 is a particularly rough neighborhood. All I can say is you better be prepared to take it, scroll by it or else you are going to get an ulcer stewing about it.

I'm the one calling him Latrine. Let's see, I've called Marfa TX "Barfa". Called Reese "Ice Maiden". Called Coachella "Cockroachella". I don't think some people understand what Latrine was doing when he gave that Advocate interview but he certainly isn't getting a box of candy and flowers from me after telling me to please stop thinking Jake is gay.

And sorry, but the nameplay will continue.

Unstinkinbelievable.

prairiegirl said...

Oh Jack, you're a hoot. I'm going to refrain from commenting further on your opportunistic personal attack.

Thank you, though for confirming points in my comment at 19:50!!

prairiegirl said...

And I will say that there have been some to put in a defensive word, some Anon and sometimes Destiny. I don't mean to act like there never has been.

But something tells me that 18:50, you have never been one of them.

But if you want to chime in right now at Jack for changing my name to peegee, hey go for it! Maybe I'll reconsider my useage of Latrine as an olive branch of good will.

Anonymous said...

I don't know what Jack is referring to, but every time I see that name I think of a hydrangea, a very pretty plant.

Anonymous said...

Sara palon LOL!

Anonymous said...

You are just a taleban.You don't want to think you don't want to see...

More troll bullshit.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

cheap publicity whores don't deserve respect. Being lucky to get a role in a movie like BBMt doesn't change anything.


^^^ are we talking about Michelle, Ann, Jake and Heath?

Surely you know they all prospered from their roles in that movie, the publicity, the attentiona and fame of that famous movie.
All of them.
Why on earth are you attacking them?
LOL lol

Anonymous said...

are we talking about Michelle, Ann, Jake and Heath?

Playing stupid doesn't work.
As you KNOW, we are discussing Jake. Michelle, Ann or Heath never posed for paparazzi or tabloid cover.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

10:01 PM - LEARN to read. Jake is gay because he beards for years and years. No one is talking about Austin or Jake's "marriage".

Anonymous said...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/05/sarah-palin-paul-revere-ride-history_n_871479.html

Anonymous said...

Jake is gay because so your life would illuminate of reflected light.I don't know if he is gay or not,of sure your insistence makes me belive that this thing concerns more you then him

Anonymous said...

Jake is gay because so your life would illuminate of reflected light.

LOL, bullshit. Stop projecting.

Anonymous said...

sure your insistence makes me belive that this thing concerns more you then him

Sure, sure, Jake is hiding in the closet all his life, but he doesn't care - makes sense! Jake gets pissed off like crazy by his Grace Jones photo because he doesn't care! lol

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

As you KNOW, we are discussing Jake. Michelle, Ann or Heath never posed for paparazzi or tabloid cover.

talk about playig stupid!

I guess in your mind Heath and Michelle was some lovey dovey made in heaven relationship, well that's ok and it may be your opinion, but others think it was for publicity also somewhat. All of them posed for the cameras and gave interviews and benefitted from BBM success. You're just mad at Jake because he did not come out as planned and as Ted predicted. Tell the truth and shame the devil will you. It's ok that you're mad at Jake for not coming out for you and being the gay spokesperson. But don't act like that's not your reason for resenting him. Because of your resentment he is fare game to make judgement calls and ridicule for every freaking thing he does. I get it, but tell the truth Ms. Weiner.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Light Bulb said...

My life is illuminated of reflected light!

Anonymous said...

It's ok that you're mad at Jake for not coming out for you and being the gay spokesperson. But don't act like that's not your reason for resenting him.

What are you talking about?!?

READ OMG and WFT2 comments, years of comments, and it is easy to see that Jake's shameless bearding and lying is the reason for resenting him. Your silly made up lies are just silly made up lies.

Ted said...

Leo DiCaprio & Blake Lively's Disneyland Date!

What does any young starlet looking to reclaim her innocence after a nude photo scandal do?

Why, visit Disneyland of course! The happiest place on Earth!

Instead of hitting the A-list MTV Awards afterparty at Soho House Sunday night, award presenter Blake Lively instead brought her new beau Leo to Disneyland for a late night date!

But this isn't the first time Lively has brought a man to the kiddie theme park: Remember her rumored romance with Ryan Gosling?!
The duo hit Disneyland in October, right after the actress broke up with her longtime BF and Gossip Girl costar, Penn Badgley.

Well, with both of those relayshes in the past and a slew of awkward nude photo questions in her future, Blake apparently decided it was Leo's turn to see her inner innocent child.

And after their whirlwind Euromance, what is more all-American good, clean fun than Disneyland?

So Blake, Leo and a group of twentysomething pals hit the theme park, where, according to Us Weekly, they "were escorted via private entrance to the front of the line on the Star Tours ride past 11 p.m. The group—seen taking photos of one another with their phones—enjoyed their own private ride on the Star Wars-themed simulation ride."

Enough with the cell phone pics, B! Haven't you learned your lesson?

"After midnight, the VIP crew was spotted again (with a guest relations tour guide) hanging outside the penny arcade on Main Street," writes the mag. "A little while later, with the park all but empty, the witness spotted to group 'chattering and laughing' during a stroll through Downtown Disney back to their hotel."

Welcome to your new relationship, Leo!

Nude photo scandals followed by Disneyland. It's exhausting being a 35-year-old dating a 23-year-old, isn't it?!

http://uk.eonline.com/uberblog/the_awful_truth/b245977_Leo_DiCaprio__Blake_Livelys_Disneyland_Date.html

Anonymous said...

Leo is 36 soon to be 37 y/o.

Anonymous said...

dating a 23-year-old

Wow, she looks 30.

Anonymous said...

I guess in your mind Heath and Michelle was some lovey dovey made in heaven relationship,

I think some people will always beieve that.
I personally think Michelle was a very conveniet hook up after the break up with Ms. Watts on that gay cowboy movie set. Yes Michelle seems nice, but she also strikes me as someone not too difficult to get in the sack (know what I mean?), but there is nothing wrong with that, mind you. She obviously took it a lot more seriously than Heath. I think by now she knows, she is not stupid after all.

You gotta give it to Michelle though, she always manages to hook up/sleep with the most interesting and hottest guys.

Anonymous said...

I personally think Michelle was a very conveniet hook up after the break up with Ms. Watts on that gay cowboy movie set.

Really? Ms. Watts was just another hook up too.

Anonymous said...

I guess in your mind Heath and Michelle was some lovey dovey made in heaven relationship

No, that is just your mind trying to make up some shit, any shit, to make Jake look better.

Anonymous said...

No, that is just your mind trying to make up some shit, any shit, to make Jake look better.

What? What does Jake have to do with Heath and Michelle? *color me confused*

reposting said...

As you KNOW, we are discussing Jake. Michelle, Ann or Heath never posed for paparazzi or tabloid cover.

talk about playig stupid!

I guess in your mind Heath and Michelle was some lovey dovey made in heaven relationship, well that's ok and it may be your opinion, but others think it was for publicity also somewhat....

Anonymous said...

I didn't post that. I don't care if any of them posed for pap pics or didn't. I just voiced my opinion on Heath and Michelle who I've followed waaay before I even knew who Jake G. was. Jake G. I only started following because of BBM and Heath. Actually I haven't posted in any Jake forum or thread in the last months. I'm not as much interested in him anymore. I like him as an actor and I think he's a nice guy, but everything else I'm starting not to care anymore. (RL isn't allowing it actually) :)

Jake said...

*sulking*

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
DL comment said...

Cary Fukunaga? Cary NASTY!

by: Spike Jonze

Anonymous said...

"You gotta give it to Michelle though, she always manages to hook up/sleep with the most interesting and hottest guys."

In what planet Spike Jonze,the nerd from The Baxter" and the Fukuyama guy are hot?
Heath was her only nice looking boyfriend, and he wasn't even THAT attractive when he hooked up with her. His looks started to fade during BBM and in his last 2 years he looked completely like shit.

Anonymous said...

Old, but kind of interesting Cooper showmance photos

Renee Zellweger, Victor Garber and Bradley Cooper

Anonymous said...

Spike Jonze looks like a nerd, but Fukuyama is very handsome.

Anonymous said...

Michelle needs to show up in gossip sites once in a while now. Her rom-com is about to hit the theaters and she will start to campaing for an Oscar along with Weinstein soon for the Marilyn movie.
She already spoke constantly about Heath to promote Blue Valentine and doing it again wouldn't look ok.
She needs to pull out something else but I wonder if people is realy interested in her because of HER and not because she was Heath's wife....

Anonymous said...

She needs to pull out something else but I wonder if people is realy interested in her because of HER and not because she was Heath's wife....

However Michelle is also a good actress,she has been great in Blue Valentine,more than the overestimated Ryan Gosling that is a decent actor but nothing of which will write to home

Anonymous said...

She has also run for oscar for BV,and I have read that when instead to win has been N.Portman she has started crying and put on a scene and Jake has had to console her.

destiny said...

Destiny none of those examples equal the success, the major push and the major attention that BBM generated. Let's not talk about Academy nominations, attention and spotlight it cast on the two lead stars in. With those films you mentioned you are talking apples and oranges here. Hardly anybody saw or know of those films. I do. But most would who are not gay would say, I've never heard of those movies. BBM is etched in our society and will be forever remembered as groundbreaking.

Nobody thought BBM would be the big hit it was. Jake was not signing on for a sure winner when he took on that role.

The other movies I mentioned may not have been seen by a lot of people, but that just again shows that BBM was not a sure thing.

And maybe you've never heard of Kinsey, but it got a lot of nominations for various film awards, including an Oscar nomination, GG nominations, Independent Spirit nominations, and got singled out by a lot of the film critic boards around the country. It was directed by Richard Condon, whose films often get award nods.

destiny said...

Most actors do work to get publicity for themselves and their movies. There is nothing wrong with it. What people like Michelle, Heath and Anne have done is pretty ordinary and tame.

I find it hard to believe you can't see the difference between that and Mr. Tabloid Cover, so I'm just going to assume you feel the need to attack everyone who makes Jake look bad in comparison.

Anonymous said...

About M.Williams:She is not that good.
I was watching a clip of Blue Valentine some weeks ago and I noticed a lot of gestures and mannerisms that were exactly the same as she put as Alma (the way she removes the tear in the corner of her eye for instance).

She does depressive,awards biting movies (although she never gets one) and the meme of her is that "she is a talented,serious actress"...but she is very limited.
I liked her in wendy&Lucy and that thriller she did with Ewan MacGregor (it was really good despite the critics) but she is a one note actor. Which is not a bad thing actually.
Harrison Ford and Gene Wilder are one note too and I love them and watch every film they are in it,even the bad ones.

If Michelle has die-hard fans I think it's all good, different strokes for different people,to each its own,whatever works,and all that shit...

Anonymous said...

she has started crying and put on a scene and Jake has had to console her

That's bullshit. There is no reason to believe Michelle is immature and vain like that. She lost Heath, her little daughter lost her father and such tragic events teach you what's important in life.

Anonymous said...

READ OMG and WFT2 comments, years of comments, and it is easy to see that Jake's shameless bearding and lying is the reason for resenting him.

^^
It's ok that you're mad at Jake for not coming out for you and being the gay spokesperson.


Because of your resentment he is fare game to make judgement calls and ridicule for every freaking thing he does.

No need to resent him at all.
Speak up for yourself. YOU be the gay spokesperson. Champion your cause with respect to others. Why get mad at Jake? Because if he's gay in the closet and bearding, there are other male HW stars doing the same. Why focus just on him is the question.

Now enters Ted!

He put in most here and at OMG minds that there was gonna be this big coming out party. It was not! And I believe he lied with Bullshit. He then claim to know about a baby in the mix, which most know is insane and does not exist. Ted got most followers motivated and emotional, but his info did not deliver.
So, let's get mad at Jake is the last resort.
It's wrong!
Even though Ted may have known some things at the start of this (mess) I can say for certain (imo) he knows NOTHING NOW.

Absolutely No Reason to Resent Jake.

Anonymous said...

All actresses in last Oscar show went to the ceremony only becouse they had to. The statue had Natalie Portman's name from the begining,deserved or not.
Having a nom and being there was better than nothing at least.

Anonymous said...

About M.Williams: She is not that good.

Michelle is great.

Anonymous said...

It is not the same things "Kinsey"it's a biography and however a decent movie but nothing to do with BBMt that is draw by a marvelous original story of AP,And the movie it has of it almost overcome the poetry imposing itself in the imaginary collective,Kinsey is a good but ordinary movie, BBMt is a piece of art from which we cannot put aside anymore there is no comparison

Anonymous said...

Well, since 10:55 AM has stated that my personal opinion means less that their own, I guess I'm obligated to solemnly declare Miss.Williams as the only actress that matters in the world..No! In the whole universe!!


happy now,dear?

Anonymous said...

there is no comparison

Stop playing stupid, it doesn't work.
Comparison is made only to show that by choosing to do BBMt Jake wasn't brave because more grafic gay sex scenes were done by many actors (before and after BBMt) and doing such scenes didn't negatively affect their careers.

Anonymous said...

Well, since 10:55 AM has stated that my personal opinion means less that their own...

Huh??? How did you conclude that from "Michelle is great." comment?

Anonymous said...

About M.Williams:She is not that good, Well she is good enough to have run for twice to the oscar,how many actresses of her generation can say the same?

Anonymous said...

She does depressive, awards biting movies

Michelle was funny in "Dick", she can do comedy too.

Anonymous said...

Michelle was funny in "Dick"

^^
Oh,yeah!
I saw the movie "Dick".Hilarious. I havent' laughed that hard since my puppy was run over by a truck

Anonymous said...

Well she is good enough to have run for twice to the oscar,how many actresses of her generation can say the same?

Only the ones linked with The Weinstein company,dear.

Anonymous said...

Stop playing stupid, it doesn't work.
Comparison is made only to show that by choosing to do BBMt Jake wasn't brave because more grafic gay sex scenes were done by many actors (before and after BBMt) and doing such scenes didn't negatively affect their careers First of all I don't see motive to offend ,I have not offended anybody,we can discussed also without exchanging offenses, The heavy impact(I don't want to call it negative) on the careeer of Jake it doesn't come from graphic gay scenes (wath they are well little thing) but came from to the incredible emotional impact and of deep empathy that Jack Twist character has on the spectator.

Anonymous said...

Sorry my ignorance but what is it "the Weinstein company"?

Anonymous said...

11:29 AM - our hatred is showing and that makes your arguments against Michelle void. Just thought you'd like to know.

Anonymous said...

Whats up with the troll going off the deep end again. Jake and Austin have been in the same town for a couple of weeks and laying low together. Yes laying not lying. Driving the troll nuts I guess.

Anonymous said...

Whats up with the troll going off the deep end again. Jake and Austin have been in the same town for a couple of weeks and laying low together. Yes laying not lying. Driving the troll nuts I guess.

you really need help

Anonymous said...

Well it's true that Michelle is few dad but perhaps it's because we associate her to the tragedy of Heath

Anonymous said...

Jake and Austin have been in the same town for a couple of weeks and laying low together.

Together? Based on what? Austin could be in Austin, TX, with his family.

Anonymous said...

Sorry my ignorance but what is it "the Weinstein company"?

Influential production company.

Anonymous said...

hoops sad is few sad, even if it is not so much mistake she is also a dad unfortunately:( I wish every good to her and Matilda.

Anonymous said...

I have not offended anybody,we can discussed also without exchanging offenses, The heavy impact(I don't want to call it negative) on the careeer of Jake it doesn't come from graphic gay scenes (wath they are well little thing) but came from to the incredible emotional impact and of deep empathy that Jack Twist character has on the spectator.

Telling someone "you are playing stupid" is not an insult, it means that someone is changing the subject or avoiding giving answers etc.
"The heavy BBMt impact" had very POSITIVE effect on Jake's career - Jake got the chance to work with great directors and made a lot of money because he was great in BBMt.

Anonymous said...

Influential production company.

Ok ,I know I'm ignorant as a goat but does she make part of it?

Anonymous said...

"The heavy BBMt impact" had very POSITIVE effect on Jake's career - Jake got the chance to work with great directors and made a lot of money because he was great in BBMt.

Of course had very positive effect on Jake's career,but balanced by so many other negative effects because unfortunately we live in a world full of ignorant and racist peaple.Jake got the chance to work with great directors because he is a very talented actor and it is for this that Ang Lee chosen him and he has been great in BBMt.

destiny said...

I think Michelle is a very good actress, loved her and Kiki in Dick, very funny movie.

After Jake was in BBM, he started appearing on all those promising young actor lists, something he wasn't on before. Unfortunately he made some poor decisions after BBM and expended a lot of his capital, and that is what hurt his career:

holding out for more money and not taking roles while he waited to see if he could win an Oscar and increase his price;

Rendition;

POP;

changing his image from sexy indie actor with ambiguous sexuality and a bit of mystery who seemed to be himself in interviews to a guarded, HW manufactured product trailing after his A list beard around the world while playing stepdad to her kids, with pap appearances that you could set your calendar to and numerous tacky tabloid covers.

You love to tell us all how it's Jake's life, and your right, it is. But it is also Jake who has to take responsibility for his career, not OMG, WFT2 and the gay rumors.

Anonymous said...

Jake and Austin have been in the same town for a couple of weeks and laying low together. Yes laying not lying. Driving the troll nuts I guess.

That's right. PrairieGirl went to Cali recently to gather more information for the Word document Jaustin archive. Ted has also been giving us subtle clues.

Anonymous said...

Of course had very positive effect on Jake's career,but balanced by so many other negative effects because unfortunately we live in a world full of ignorant and racist peaple.

I know that during BBMt time there was a lot of homophobia about the movie and Jake was the target, but that was 6 years ago and most of the reactions were very positive.

Jake gained so much by doing BBMt that overall effect was positive and Jake has nothing to complain about.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Soapy aka Austin last tweet was of him in a cab in L.A. The only reason why I would think that anyone would be in cab that has a car is to be driven to an airport, so I think that he may not be in L.A. at the moment.

There is speculation on some OTH sites that Ms. soapy aka Sophia is in Afghanastian at the moment reporting on the condition of women there for a magazine. She stopped tweeting around the same time he did.

There were several fb sightings of Jake in L.A. yesterday.

Anonymous said...

Because of your resentment he is fare game to make judgement calls and ridicule for every freaking thing he does.
No need to resent him at all.
Speak up for yourself. YOU be the gay spokesperson.


No one wants or needs Jake to be gay spokesperson - you are making that bullshit because you have no other arguments to trash people who believe Jake is gay.

Anonymous said...

We all know that the FB sightings and Tweets are bogus - Jake and hubby Austin have been in LA together in their matrimonial home, with the BTs.

Anonymous said...

Sure. And all photos of Jake and MS guys are fake, he wasn't on the tour with them, he was with Austin on his birthday. Not.

Anonymous said...

Destiny I agree with most of your comment but I disagree with your assessment of his career choices. It's never a totally correct path towards being a top notch A list actor.

We can say the same for Heath. He took the Batman part and I'm sure he knew that role would be a big success. Of course his acting had to make it successful. What I'm saying is he made the choice that would raise his clout as and actor. Heath also made some bad choices just as other actors / actress have done. There are so many actors who are really good or great who never get the attention they deserve. Christian Bale has finally achieved his.

As for Jake bearding and photo op's, I'm not gonna say every damn woman he's seen with is a beard. I think that's to broad of a statement since I don't really know him although I've followed his career since BBM. And whoever continues to make those broad statements about his relationships, whatever they are, who don't know him personally deffinately has an agenda.

Anonymous said...

And whoever continues to make those broad statements about his relationships, whatever they are, who don't know him personally deffinately has an agenda.

You don't know Jake personaly either.
Some of us followed Jake's showmances with Reese Witherspoon and Taylor Swift very closely - all comments are still posted on WFT2 and OMG.
Everyone makes mistakes, even Reese Witherspoon was caught in a lie when she didn't know what was served for her birthday dinner - because there was no bithday dinner with Jake, she made that up.
We know that Jake never lived with Witherspoon, that he faked relationships with her and Swift, we are sure about it.

Anonymous said...

whatever they are, who don't know him personally deffinately has an agenda

What about your agenda?

Anonymous said...

Of cours that whole matter is more positive than negative,and Jake has to be proud to have participated in way so important a masterpiece as BBMt,then however I'm also agreed with Destiny that some guilt is his to have been lazy,to have chosen badly the roles and not to invest on its qualities more than on its physical dowries.On the his private life I can't say anything I don't have elements ,can be true everythig and the contrary one of everythig.

Anonymous said...

some guilt is his to have been lazy

Being a parent to three children is not being lazy. His priorities changed once his juices were swirled with Austin's and the children came into their lives.

Anonymous said...

Reese Witherspoon was caught in a lie when she didn't know what was served for her birthday dinner - because there was no bithday dinner with Jake, she made that up.

And Us Weekly was caught in a lie about Jake attending Swift's birthday party in Nashville - Jake was in LA, we found that out because he was nominated for GG after which Us Weekly deleted the article from the site (we have screen captures).

Anonymous said...

His priorities changed once his juices were swirled with Austin's and the children came into their lives.

Is that why Jake tours with MS and Austin spends weekends with Sophia in PR and goes to Indonesia on his own after months and months of filming OTH? Jake and Austin just love spending time with their kids!

Anonymous said...

LOL 1:13pm - do you always swallow what PR feeds you?

Anonymous said...

do you always swallow what PR feeds you?

What PR?
We have photos of Jake spending Austin's birthday with MS and staying with them during the tour.
We have photos of Austin and Sophia in PR.
We have proof that Jake was away from Austin when he had the opportunity to be with him.
We have proof that Austin was away from Jake when he had the opportunity to be with him (traveling with Sophia, for example).
You don't have any proof that Jake and Austin are spending any time togeter. Nothing.

Anonymous said...

o m g I need a tutor "everything"! sorry :)

Anonymous said...

I think that's to broad of a statement since I don't really know him although I've followed his career since BBM.

Did you follow his "relationships" with women since BBM? That was very easy bacause Jake made it sure that everyone can see him with his "girlfriends" week after week after week.

Anonymous said...

You don't have any proof that Jake and Austin are spending any time togeter. Nothing.

We have the OMG word document where it is all recorded.

Anonymous said...

Is "Dick"that movie back in the seventies and it has somethingto whether to do the President Nixon?

Anonymous said...

Yes.

Story of two girls who wander away from a White House tour and meet President Nixon.

Anonymous said...

Thanks it's an amusing movie and Kiki and Michelle are funny and good

Variety said...

Eisenberg's next trick: 'Now You See Me'

Jake Gyllenhaal also has an offer for Summit's magician-heist pic

EXCLUSIVE: After a prolonged casting search, Summit Entertainment and director Louis Leterrier ("Clash of the Titans") have finally found a leading man for their magician-heist pic "Now You See Me," as Jesse Eisenberg has agreed in principal to star and is in early negotiations to work his movie star magic.

Additionally, Summit's "Source Code" star Jake Gyllenhaal has an offer to play the other lead. Studio had previously been courting Colin Firth, Sacha Baron Cohen, Jim Carrey and Hugh Grant as potential topliners before they decided to cast the roles with younger thesps.

Thriller follows a group of the world's greatest illusionists, who pull off daring bank heists during their performances, showering the profits on their audience. Eventually, the FBI gets involved, prompting a cat-and-mouse game between adversaries.

Dealmaking with Eisenberg and Gyllenhaal is still in the very early stages, so don't be surprised if one or the other pulls a disappearing act due to scheduling, which is still being worked out.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118038247

Anonymous said...

kvndvddmy: Its hotter than a Ryan Reynolds/Jake Gyllenhaal sex tape outside.
about 5 hours ago

Anonymous said...

4:15 Did you deliberately leave this bit out?.

"Gyllenhaal has driven the mid-budget thriller "Source Code" to an impressive $111 million worldwide gross. Thesp is currently attached to star in David Ayer's cop drama "End of Watch."

Anonymous said...

Jake Gyllenhaal also has an offer for Summit's magician-heist pic.

Wow, what a great idea. :)

Anonymous said...

Did you deliberately leave this bit out?

We mentioned more than once that Source Code made a profit.

Anonymous said...

There's something really attractive about Jesse Eisenberg too - must be that curly mop of hair he has. :)

Anonymous said...

Wow, what a great idea.

You think so? I wonder why Colin Firth, Sacha Baron Cohen, Jim Carrey and Hugh Grant weren't interested.

Anonymous said...

4:39 Can't you read?.

"Studio had previously been courting Colin Firth, Sacha Baron Cohen, Jim Carrey and Hugh Grant as potential topliners before they decided to cast the roles with younger thesps.".

Oh and 4:37 your holier and thou attitude is laughable.

Anonymous said...

Thesp is currently attached to star in David Ayer's cop drama "End of Watch."

Why just "attached" when they are going to start filming in a few weeks?

Anonymous said...

I don't know if those actors would be right for the roles, IMHO. The comedians - you want someone to play against type so that the comic heists are a bit funny/shocking - like Heath being cast as the Joker, unpredictable. Hugh Grant and Colin Firth - maybe.

Anonymous said...

Another little Blake & Leo photo op.

ONTD

Leo starting to become a famewhore? ;)

Anonymous said...

Did you deliberately leave this bit out?

Are you trying to tell us something? "Source Code" will make a healthy profit, but people won't watch it because Jake is the lead.
LAOD will make a nice profit too, but domestic gross is only $32,367,005 which isn't good.

The problem: Jake wants to be A-list but still can't open a movie.

Anonymous said...

And he doesn't work enough.

Jake said...

What?! Oh, wait...

Anonymous said...

Leo starting to become a famewhore? ;)

^^^ What? You people kill me with this famewhore Bs. Most of you scour the net looking for your favorite star obsessing how hot, cool, indie, cute they are. Then act as if you don't read the tabs. about anything. I wouldn't be surprise if half of you watch the most stupid show on TV, TMZ. With dumb paps hounding stars with a non story.
Even the one's most of you claim to like are just as much famewhores as the rest.
the nerve of some people.

Someone's famewhore is another persons favorite star.

Anonymous said...

Additionally, Summit's "Source Code" star Jake Gyllenhaal has an offer to play the other lead. Studio had previously been courting Colin Firth, Sacha Baron Cohen, Jim Carrey and Hugh Grant as potential topliners before they decided to cast the roles with younger thesps.

is a good thing?

Anonymous said...

Additionally, Summit's "Source Code" star Jake Gyllenhaal has an offer to play the other lead. Studio had previously been courting Colin Firth, Sacha Baron Cohen, Jim Carrey and Hugh Grant as potential topliners before they decided to cast the roles with younger thesps.

is a good thing?

Anonymous said...

Are you trying to tell us something? "Source Code" will make a healthy profit, but people won't watch it because Jake is the lead.
LAOD will make a nice profit too, but domestic gross is only $32,367,005 which isn't good.

The problem: Jake wants to be A-list but still can't open a movie.

You are a little bit drastic, SC has been good on the BO.

Anonymous said...

Huh?

Anonymous said...

is a good thing?

Any new project is a good thing for Jake.

Anonymous said...

Huh?

What have not you understood?

Anonymous said...

Any new project is a good thing for Jake.

of corse,I meant it's a good director? it's an important project?

Anonymous said...

Not enough info at the moment.

Anonymous said...

ok thanks the same :)

Anonymous said...

lol another flop in the pipeline

Anonymous said...

we have an optimist here!

Anonymous said...

SOURCE CODE IS NOT A FLOP

Anonymous said...

Source code is not a flop. Decent success but the draw was Duncan Jones the director of Moon. Jake was downplayed in the poster and ads until the movie proved itself. Dont get me wrong. Jake was fine it in. Memorable? Breathtaking? No. He did not make the movie. Not like Heath in the Dark Knight. He leaped off the screen and made such an impression it seemed no one else could have done it.

Anonymous said...

Source Code is a very good movie and the kind male and female public likes to watch - Jake or no Jake, I would watch Source Code because of the subject (but wouldn't watch LAOD or PoP, for example). So in this case Jake choosed well and will profit because public likes the movie and likes him in the movie.

Anonymous said...

she has started crying and put on a scene and Jake has had to console her

That's bullshit. There is no reason to believe Michelle is immature and vain like that. She lost Heath, her little daughter lost her father and such tragic events teach you what's important in life.

^^

I think it was something in the middle. Even though she expected Nat to win, she probably was still a tad disappointed.

Oh and I bet she enjoyed Jake consoling her, if he did (since IMHO she has a weakness for him). ;)

Anonymous said...

Source code is not a flop. Decent success but the draw was Duncan Jones the director of Moon. Jake was downplayed in the poster and ads until the movie proved itself. Dont get me wrong. Jake was fine it in. Memorable? Breathtaking? No. He did not make the movie. Not like Heath in the Dark Knight. He leaped off the screen and made such an impression it seemed no one else could have done it.

June 09, 2011 12:57 AM

Sorry but it's not so,Jake has chosen the subject Jake has wanted Duncan Jones,Jake found the money to make the movie and always Jake has actively collaborated to the realizition of the movie because he had a clear idea of that wanted,and he has eliminated who otherwise thougt it.You look for what Jones and the producers say of him (I have a project to long expiration with him, He should be the director.)Jake is not just the actor what wose found here for a lucky case,without him the movie would not be made. It is not Jones that has chosen Jake it is the contrary one. And it cannot be comparrede with the fantastic joker of Heath, SC is just a movie of passage as Casanova for Heat. For his performance you look for the reviews on Rollind Stone and many others or also what common people says on Rotten Tomatoes.

Anonymous said...

Heath not Heat sorry

Anonymous said...

Jake is not just the actor what wose found here for a lucky case,without him the movie would not be made.

That's not true. You might not remember, but we discussed great "Source Code" script review - it is hard to find a good script in Hollywood, but when you find it you can be sure that someone will use it to make a movie.

Anonymous said...

It is not Jones that has chosen Jake it is the contrary one.

Yes, but only after studio and producers decided to invest 32 million and make that movie.

Anonymous said...

it's true instead,SC sript it was good for sure,but without Jake no movie ,He has done the job. I have sade only the truth all you can check.

Anonymous said...

Yes, but only after studio and producers decided to invest 32 million and make that movie.

it's not so Jake has cotacted Jones before the studio belived in the movie.

Anonymous said...

but without Jake no movie

That's not true, Source Code was produced by Summit. Producers and movie studios invest money and they choose and employ leading actors and / or directors.

Anonymous said...

Jake has gotten the money from the studio non Jones,that is a great director and he had made "Moon" but he was almost unknow and with a disastrous Box office experience.

Anonymous said...

it's true instead,SC sript it was good for sure,but without Jake no movie ,He has done the job. I have sade only the truth all you can check

Sorry, you misunderstood, Jake has nothing to do with initial movie production:

Nov. 8, 2009

Jake Gyllenhaal is in negotiations to star in sci-fi thriller "Source Code" for Vendome Pictures and the Mark Gordon Co. Duncan Jones will direct and Mark Gordon will produce with Vendome's CEO Philippe Rousselet and Jordan Wynn. Production is slated to begin during the first quarter.

Summit Entertainment will distribute the film in the U.S. Summit International is also handling international sales, which began at the American Film Market with more than 15 territories licensed.

"Source Code" centers on a soldier who wakes up in the body of an unknown commuter and is forced to live and relive a harrowing train bombing until he can determine who is responsible for it.

Project had originally been set up at Universal in early 2007 when the studio bought Ben Ripley's screenplay and attached Topher Grace to star. Universal tapped Shane Abbess to helm last year. Current script includes revises by Billy Ray ("State of Play").

"Source Code" will launch the Vendome slate, according to Rousselet, who said the project exemplifies the types of producers and filmmakers with whom Vendome plans to work. He and co-CEO Fabrice Gianfermi plan to produce a minimum of a dozen films over the next five years.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118011029?refCatId=13

Anonymous said...

That's not true, Source Code was produced by Summit. Producers and movie studios invest money and they choose and employ leading actors and / or directors.

it's not true,checks it better I have say only true things

Anonymous said...

it's not true,checks it better I have say only true things

Please read Variety article from November 2009:

Jake Gyllenhaal is in negotiations to star in sci-fi thriller "Source Code" for Vendome Pictures and the Mark Gordon Co. Duncan Jones will direct and Mark Gordon will produce with Vendome's CEO Philippe Rousselet and Jordan Wynn.

Project had originally been set up at Universal in early 2007 when the studio bought Ben Ripley's screenplay and attached Topher Grace to star. Universal tapped Shane Abbess to helm last year. Current script includes revises by Billy Ray ("State of Play").

Anonymous said...

I HAVE NOT MISTAKEN,the project wos dead and jake has thrown out it choosing Jones and treating him the studio

Anonymous said...

Was dead to the studio sorry :)

Anonymous said...

Is trolly off its meds today?

Anonymous said...

I HAVE NOT MISTAKEN,the project wos dead and jake has thrown out it choosing Jones and treating him the studio

Sorry, Variety is better informed. Jake was choosed to star in the movie and AFTER that he got the chance to be involved in Source Code production.

Anonymous said...

maybe jones is better informed the Variety: " The acclaim from moon launched Jones into the statosphere and while he tried to gets his "blade runner"-ish sci fi follow up "MUTE"off the ground all the buzz in the world couldn't help find financer to take the risk of featuring a leading actor that doesn't talk in their movie(though Jones is confident yhat with the right actor one day the project will happen) Jones had been talking to Jake Gyllenhaal about the part when the actor thought of JONES to direct "Source Code"a trippy,time-jumping sci fi pictur written Ben Rypley and one that had been featured high on the 2008 Black list. jones jumped on an eccellent cast etc.....

Anonymous said...

maybe jones is better informed the Variety

What you posted is the same info reported by Variety and others: production company offered Jake a role in "Source Code" and then Jake talked with Jones and Jones was happy to direct.

"All the buzz in the world couldn't help find financer to take the risk" is about movie "Mute", not "source Code".

Anonymous said...

No way what i have posted is drawn from "indieWIRE blog network" not Variety. I perfectly know that JONES spoke of"Mute"I have brought the whole discourse. In an intervew Jake says that SC was one of the most beautiful and inresting project of HW but for a motiv or for the other it never did nothyng,and when he had seen "Moon"has remained lightened by Jones he has stuck to the project and he has tried everything to realize it. Jake was fully involved in the production and realization of SC done of it a reason.

Is It Time to Rethink Bradley Cooper? said...

Bradley Cooper has given countless high-profile interviews on behalf of The Hangover Part II, but the one where he came off best was never even intended to be seen in the United States. That would be his recent appearance on a Gallic chat show speaking perfect, fluent French, which became a swoon-inspiring YouTube phenomenon that even persuaded some pundits who'd dismissed the actor to reevaluate him. On May 20, before the video exploded, Hollywood Elsewhere's Jeff Wells was still calling Cooper a "fizzy-souled showbiz whore"; on June 1, after viewing the clip, Wells posted the video and grudgingly admitted, "Like those who play piano and can quote Shakespeare at length, I've always been impressed by French-speakers." Maybe Cooper should try this French thing a little more often! Or, alternately, are people starting to realize that they had been kind of a dick to him?

Because really, why was he so divisive in the first place? A NextMovie blog post called him the "most polarizing actor in Hollywood," but Cooper has hardly fed into that perception himself. Though his good looks and his occasional squiring of famous actresses may have contributed to the rancor, it's more than likely that audiences had simply come to associate the 36-year-old too strongly with his two breakout roles: Wedding Crashers, where he played a fratty asshole, and the Hangover movies, where he plays a smug jerk. In recent months, Cooper has committed to playing the title role in a remake of The Crow and Lucifer in Paradise Lost, and for people who know him only as Phil from The Hangover, those projects sounded like a stretch.

more said...

But for people who were already following Cooper's career before he became a box-office star, it's his facility for jerky roles that came as a surprise, since he was more likely to be typecast as the perennial sensitive sweetheart. Before Wedding Crashers, Cooper was best known for playing the best friend to Jennifer Garner in Alias " i.e. the guy who was so beta-male that Michael Vartan was an action hero in comparison " and before that, he'd played a winning supporting role in Wet Hot American Summer, where he bottomed for Michael Ian Black in a summer camp shed, then gay-married him. Suffice it to say, neither of those would be high on Phil's Netflix list.

Over the last few months, Cooper has proven his versatility (in Limitless, which was a bona fide sleeper hit that he carried on his shoulders), his smarts (he's writing the script to Hyperion, a sci-fi novel optioned by Graham King), his humility (he's said that as much as he wants to direct Hyperion, he doubts anyone would let him, and he launched a self-effacing bid for the role of Tom Buchanan in The Great Gatsby through the New York Times), and his charm. He's been a great talk-show guest no matter which language he was speaking, and for his current Esquire cover story, he even prepared a stuffed-squid dinner for the journalist interviewing him. It almost seems too over-the-top " can a male movie star really be so charming and guileless? But why not say oui? After all, George Clooney can't do it all by himself.

http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/06/is_it_time_to_reevaluate_bradl.html

Anonymous said...

Jake was fully involved in the production and realization of SC...

Not true, Variety is realiable source.
Jake got the role and did some celebrity type producing - other people are real producers.

Anonymous said...

In an intervew Jake says that SC was one of the most beautiful and inresting project of HW but for a motiv or for the other it never did nothyng

Jake can say whatever he likes, but we know facts. "Source Code" wasn't his project, he just got the role.

Anonymous said...

and why in the world Jake and Jones are not a realible source when the they speaks of their movie?

Anonymous said...

Jake can say whatever he likes, but we know facts. "Source Code" wasn't his project, he just got the role.

why Jake should say the forgery? And if is not true why nobody has denied him?

Anonymous said...

and why in the world Jake and Jones are not a realible source when the they speaks of their movie?

I haven't heard Jake or Duncan saying what you are claiming they said, so it is just your word against info from Variety.

Anonymous said...

why Jake should say the forgery? And if is not true why nobody has denied him?

Post a link and prove that Jake really said it.

Anonymous said...

Over the last few months, Cooper has proven his versatility (in Limitless, which was a bona fide sleeper hit that he carried on his shoulders), his smarts (he's writing the script to Hyperion, a sci-fi novel optioned by Graham King), his humility (he's said that as much as he wants to direct Hyperion, he doubts anyone would let him, and he launched a self-effacing bid for the role of Tom Buchanan in The Great Gatsby through the New York Times), and his charm. He's been a great talk-show guest no matter which language he was speaking, and for his current Esquire cover story, he even prepared a stuffed-squid dinner for the journalist interviewing him. It almost seems too over-the-top " can a male movie star really be so charming and guileless? But why not say oui? After all, George Clooney can't do it all by himself.

Really? Cooper is the next big thing in Hollywood? :)

Anonymous said...

Limitless

Production Budget: $27 million

Domestic: $78,779,339
+ Foreign: $66,700,000
= Worldwide: $145,479,339

Anonymous said...

SXSW Video: Duncan Jones and Jake Gyllenhaal Talk Source Code
Jake Gyllenhaal was attached to sci-fi script Source Code when he saw Duncan Jones’ $5 million space drama Moon, starring Sam Rockwell in a multi-layered performance. He thought Jones was perfectly suited to direct Source Code, which played well as the SXSW Film Fest opener Friday night. Summit will release it April 1
indieWIRE* toh!Thompson on Hollywood

Anonymous said...

Jake Gyllenhaal was attached to sci-fi script Source Code when he saw Duncan Jones’ $5 million space drama Moon

OK, so Jake suggested Duncan Jones as "Source Code" director to the production company. That was nice of him and not a bad choice. What is your point?

«Oldest ‹Older   801 – 1000 of 2181   Newer› Newest»