Luke Evans
The Advocate, September 3, 2002
The Advocate: How did you decide you were going to be open about your sexuality?
Luke Evans: Well it was something I'd spoken to a lot of people about, including my boyfriend at the time - we've broken up now - but at the time when I just got Taboo, I knew that even though my part was a straight character, everybody knew me as a gay man and, in my life in London, I never tried to hide it. I knew I was going to have to do interviews with gay magazines, so I thought, ‘Well, I’m going to have to be open’. It’s who I am. And if people don’t like it, then I don’t want their jobs. I've never been a very good liar, which is another thing...
The Advocate: Aren't actors all good liars?
Luke Evans: Well, it's not nice. Look at George Michael, let's say. I mean, he hid it for so many years, and then he gets found out in a really awful way... Y'know, you start a slippery slope downward, and I don't want to start that at 22. If that means I'm going to be a poor man at 60, then at least I've lived a happy, open, gay life and not had to hide from anybody.
The Advocate: Do you think it might be different in the UK than in America?
Luke Evans: Well, it depends on how big you are. It's not a big issue, and it's never going to be a big issue for me; whether I'm successful or if I weren't successful, at least I'll never have that skeleton in the closet they can rattle out. Y'know what I mean?
Eight years later...
Wales On Sunday, September 19 2010
RISING actor Luke Evans is rapidly gaining star status after landing yet another major Hollywood role and romancing Charlotte Church’s ex – ex-PA, that is.
Fresh from playing breastplate-baring Zeus in Immortals and Apollo in Clash Of The Titans, 31-year-old Evans is sword fighting once again in a re-make of The Three Musketeers.
And Evans, from Aberbargoed, is described as “top farmer totty” for his role in Brit-com Tamara Drewe, has a special reason to be careful with his blade now he is dating stunning fashion industry marketing expert Holly Goodchild.
Miss Goodchild, 27, former personal assistant to Welsh singing superstar Church, said at the Tamara Drewe movie premiere: “Luke’s lovely – we’re really old friends and it just sort of happened.”
She added: “We are nowhere near engaged but things are really good.”
Source: That Time Luke Evans Talked About Being Gay
2,286 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 1601 – 1800 of 2286 Newer› Newest»I'm hungry!
Stop winning!
So, Source Code had nothing to do with web development. And Jake Gyllenhaal looked weird in it. #disappointed
1 hour ago
When we’re little, our parents always told us to share with others since it’s the nice thing to do and it’s supposed to make you a better person.
Well, I think Maggie Gyllenhaal is taking that concept a little too far because the actress has recently admitted to letting her friends borrow her many vibrators. First of all, why does she have so many vibrators? And secondly, why is she lending them out like they’re library books?
Apparently the reason is because she’s starring in Hysteria, a movie about the invention of the vibrator, so several vibrator businesses thought it would be a great PR move to send some samples to Maggie. I guess this is one time where taking your work home with you doesn’t seem so bad.
So after she was bombarded with the numerous sex toys while shooting the film, Maggie thought it would be a good idea to give the unwanted ones to her friends to enjoy. Although the sentiment sounds sweet enough, I can’t help but find it revolting (and highly unsanitary).
Maggie explained her (lack of) thought process, saying, “By the time I finished the movie I’d been sent maybe 15 vibrators by different people in London with vibrator stores. It was a pleasant surprise. So I have this incredible collection, and I actually use like one or two of them. I lend them to my friends, and they’ll take them for six months at a time.” Is this even socially acceptable?
http://www.hollywoodchitchat.com/2011/09/maggie-gyllenhaal-lets-friends-borrow-her-sex-toys/
Is this even socially acceptable?
Why not? :)
When we’re little, our parents always told us to share with others since it’s the nice thing to do and it’s supposed to make you a better person.
I wonder how Jake feels about sharing his toys...
She was talking about sharing handbags, not vibrators, they left that part out.
You mean they made up story about sharing vibrators?
She was talking about sharing handbags, not vibrators, they left that part out.
She talked about both:
"Maggie Gyllenhaal needs a little help from her friends when it comes to using her extensive assortment of purses. “One thing about being an actress is I get sent a lot of bags. So I have this incredible collection, and I actually use like one or two of them," she told The Cut at Mulberry’s 40th birthday bash on Monday. "I lend them to my friends, and they’ll take them for six months at a time.” But bags aren't the only goodie friends of Maggie can expect to borrow: She also has a surplus of vibrators. Her collection was amassed while shooting the movie Hysteria: “I was sent a lot of vibrators from different sex stores in England while we were shooting the movie,” she said, laughing. “I shared them around.”
http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2011/09/maggie_gylenhaal_has_more_hand.html
Ever since he broke out as a teen idol in Twilight, Taylor Lautner's agents at William Morris Endeavor have been busily racking up multi-million-dollar roles outside of the franchise: They got him $5 million for Abduction (opening today), $7.5 million for Universal’s planned adaptation of Stretch Armstrong, and are said to be demanding a $10 million salary for Goliath, a modern retelling of the Biblical story in which he might play David. Also on his docket: Incarceron, based on the Catherine Fisher novel, and two other untitled action-thrillers — one with Michael Bay’s Platinum Dunes that’s currently out to studios, and another set up at New Regency Productions.
"William Morris has done a brilliant job of convincing Hollywood that he’s the next big movie star," says a senior production executive at a major studio, who asked not to be named because he regularly does business with Lautner’s agents and agency. Adds the exec, “Any agent can ask for ten [million], but you also need someone to pay. [The studios] certainly stepped up and they paid." But so far Lautner is all potential, never having actually led a film that didn't involve turning into a lycanthrope: Everyone was convinced that Robert Pattinson was going to be a huge romantic lead … until Remember Me proved forgettable. Another studio exec explains, “I remember when [Universal co-chairman] Donna Langley cast him in Stretch Armstrong, she said to me, 'He’s the real deal!' And I thought, Based on what?! Based on Twilight?” So what happens to his optimistic career if Abduction gets a harsh reality check at the box office?
Current audience polling data shared with Vulture by studio sources suggests Abduction’s appeal looks to be very limited — not just by Lautner’s own narrow fan base of tween and young teen girls, but by intense competition this weekend. Only slightly less than three fourths (72 percent) of total people surveyed were aware of Abduction, and only a third or so of those (33 percent) expressed "definite interest" in seeing it. Distribution insiders say that with those numbers, the film will be lucky to debut in third place with $12 million to $15 million, well behind the second week of a rerelease of The Lion King and Steven Soderbergh’s Contagion, which is heading into its third weekend, and possibly behind Brad Pitt in Moneyball.
To understand why Abduction isn’t breaking through requires an understanding of Lautner's strengths and weaknesses. Post Twilight, it’s no surprise that women under age 25 would be most interested in seeing Lautner put the Ab in Abduction, and they are. Nearly 85 percent of that demo is aware of the film and almost half (43 percent) has expressed "definite interest" in seeing it. Unhappily, however, Lautner appears to be a surprisingly polarizing figure even among his core fans: The number of young women expressing "definitely no interest" is surprisingly high, almost 10 percent. (By way of comparison, only 6 percent of women under 25 and 3 percent of women over 25 said they were "definitely NOT interested" in seeing the male- and adult-skewing Moneyball, thanks mostly to the broad, intergenerational sex appeal of Brad Pitt.) Perversely, one former studio marketing chief theorizes that Lautner's relatively high turnoff rate with this demo might be a result of Twihards who can't separate fantasy from reality: “This could be that ridiculous Team Jacob versus Team Edward bullshit that tween girls care about so much.”
Then there’s the matter of Lautner’s intense competition for males of any age. Though Lautner's following is mostly female, the film is being marketed as a Tom Cruise–ian action flick, likely as a way to get men in, too. But they're not buying, especially with the film opening against Moneyball and Killer Elite. The latter film, with its fortysomething action stars Jason Statham and Clive Owen (and the 68-year-old Robert De Niro), has piqued the interest of action-addicted young males: Nearly two thirds (62 percent) are aware of it, and almost half of those (49 percent) expressed definite interest in seeing it. But while far more young guys have heard of Abduction (69 percent), they are decidedly less interested in it, with barely a quarter (26 percent) expressing definite interest in seeing his solo act.
Lautner, unsurprisingly, also loses the fight for older men, thanks to Moneyball: Nearly 81 percent of men over 25 have heard of Pitt’s film, and 42 percent have definite interest in seeing it, a number that will only grow larger thanks to its overwhelmingly positive critical reviews, which still actually matter to older moviegoers. As of this morning, it enjoyed a 94 percent fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes. By comparison, almost two thirds (64 percent) of men over 25 have heard of Abduction, but only one in four (26 percent) want to see it — a number that won't be helped by its avalanche of pans; it hangs steady at a Rotten Tomatoes score of 7 percent. (The New York Times review carried the headline, "At Least His Abs Get a Workout," and singled out Lautner’s acting for special scorn, noting “If his physiognomy — recessed eyes that don’t seem to focus, a wide snub nose and Elvis-y lips — conjure Neanderthal manhood after a cosmetic makeover, his boyish monotone with its utter lack of inflection suggests that he is really an advanced robot simulating human speech without registering emotion or even comprehension.”)
So, if Abduction does fail to open in the high teens, what will happen to Lautner's future projects? First, Universal will likely consider putting Stretch Armstrong in turnaround. “Abduction is [like] selling Tobey Maguire in anything outside of Spider-Man,” explains our former studio marketing chief, “You have a built-in awareness, but that’s not the same as appeal. If I were sitting on top of Stretch Armstrong now, I’d be terrified.” Even before the weak tracking on Abduction surfaced, Universal’s new owners at Comcast were rapidly losing interest in reverse engineering pricey movies out of Hasbro’s toy chest. In the last two months, the studio put both Ouija and Clue in turnaround, and Stretch might well be next, since a big-budget, 3-D blockbuster cannot, by definition, be a “one quadrant” movie appealing only to squealing tween girls.
Even still, many of Lautner's other slated films will likely go forward no matter how Abduction fares, as a studio rarely backs out once a deal is signed. However, if the movie does underperform, every subsequent movie becomes all the more important to his future worth, and his $10 million price tag will surely be marked down. Agents say they fear his devaluation because that reality check could put a stop to the unreal checks their clients have been able to cash despite being still relatively unproven talent. For example, Ryan Reynolds is understood to have received $7 million for the now-filming R.I.P.D, a paycheck he sealed before Green Lantern and The Change-Up both failed. (And then there's the $3 million Alex Pettyfer was being offered before I Am Number Four cratered.) “It’s a spoiler for us, because they’ll have shown the emperor’s naked,” says one agent of another young leading man. “It’ll be like Jim Carrey [getting $20 million for] The Cable Guy all over again, or the infamous Gretchen Mol Vanity Fair cover. If it doesn’t open, that’ll be the end of exorbitant paydays for people who might actually deserve them, but haven’t proven themselves yet.” Indeed, as our production exec notes about Lautner, “Now it’s time to find out if people will say, ‘He’s a movie star!’ or ‘Good God, he can’t act to save his life!’” An end to the days when attractive hunks are paid eight figures simply because girls might love them: Will the class warfare never end?
http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/09/taylor_lautner_what_if_abducti.html
Everyone was convinced that Robert Pattinson was going to be a huge romantic lead …
Based on what? Ugly face? Bad acting? Zero sex appeal?
The New York Times review...
Ouch, ouch, ouch!
Good luck to Taylor L! :)
Taylor L is already insanely lucky.
Abduction is [like] selling Tobey Maguire in anything outside of Spider-Man,” explains our former studio marketing chief, “You have a built-in awareness, but that’s not the same as appeal.
Ouch! So true. LOL
Lucky for Tobey then that he had a pretty decent CV before he took on Spidey.
'We had a beautiful relationship': Naomi Watts opens up about her romance with tragic Heath Ledger
Naomi Watts has opened up about her ex Heath Ledger saying the late actor was a 'very special soul' who 'made a great impact on my life.'
The 43-year-old actress - who is currently promoting her movies Dream House and J Edgar - dated the Australian star for nearly two years.
Their relationship ended in 2004 and he died four years later at the age of 28.
Although they were dating different people at the time of his death Watts has fond memories of the Brokeback Mountain star.
'Good times,' Watts tells America's More magazine when asked about Ledger.
'We had a beautiful relationship, only a couple of years, but he was a man who was completely full of joy, and there was a lot of laughing and affection.
'He was really a very special soul and made a great impact on my life.
'And a great actor, but I know there was so much more to come. And it's such a tragedy for his little daughter.'
Ledger went on to date actress Michelle Williams, with whom he had a child, Matilda who turns six in October.
Ironically, Watts - who has two sons with her boyfriend Liev Schreiber - lost her father when she was just seven.
Peter Watts was a sound engineer and road manager for rock group Pink Floyd.
He died when she was a little girl and seven years later the actress moved from the UK where she was born to live in Australia with her mum, stepfather and brother.
Asked how the death of her father impacted her life, Watts is at first cagey, saying: 'I don't talk about him.'
According to the reporter she later says in an e-mail: 'It's too personal. Forgive me...'
But Watts eventually comments in another e-mail sent two weeks after the original interview.
She wrote: 'Not knowing my father always made me feel like a piece of myself was missing or unknown. Not reachable.
'And growing up, there was this wondering what he would think of me or what I would think of him.'
Now the mother of two sons - Alexander, four, and Samuel, two - Watts is very clear about the legacy she wants to leave her children. 'I want them to feel connected to me and me to them,' she says. 'Always. 'I want them, above all, to feel sure of who they are. 'That they are safe in the world and confident and happy people. 'And of course, connected - to their parents, their friends, their family, the world and themselves. 'This is the most important goal/dream in my life. Everything else is gravy.'
Aside from talking about her personal life, Watts also reveals that she has a 'bawdy' sense of humour.
'Bawdy' is apparently the word that actress Nicole Kidman used to describe her friend's sense of fun.
Watts agrees, saying: 'I do, I do.
'And it's definitely heightened when I'm in the company of Australian women and a drink.'
For the full interview visit More magazine.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2040723/Naomi-Watts-romance-Heath-Ledger-We-beautiful-relationship.html
Taylor Lautner and Lily Collins 'have split' despite never having confirmed their relationship in the first place
It had barely begun and now Taylor Lautner's short-lived relationship with Lily Collins is over.
According to US Weekly, the Abduction co-stars called it quits just one week before the September 15 premiere of their new film, Abduction. The tabloid's website ran the report today, which conveniently happens to be the day the thriller was released nationwide in the US.
'It was a clean break that Taylor initiated,' a source says, explaining that the split actually occurred one week prior to the LA premiere and afterparty. Apparently neither star was adept at acting civil towards the other and the situation was blatantly uncomfortable to onlookers.
'At the Abduction party, it was awkward,' the source admits. 'They barely said a word to one another.'
Although it's been reported that the two actually engaged in a real-life romance, neither star nor their reps have actually confirmed the claim. Still, the 19-year-old Twilight star has spoken kind words about his former co-star and love interest.
'You can feel some sort of chemistry or a connection when you are reading a script with someone for the first time,' he told Seventeen magazine, adding, 'And that was totally the case with Lily.'
Now that the star is nearly done promoting Abduction, he 'wants to be single for a while [so that] he can properly move on', says the insider. Lautner has been hanging out with a different ex, Taylor Swift, recently, even going backstage at her LA concert August 28 after she gave him a shout-out at the show.
Regardless of who he dates next, the actor will certainly be busy in coming months: he'll start promoting the fourth Twilight Saga installment, Breaking Dawn: Part 1, in November.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2041286/Taylor-Lautner-Lily-Collins-broke-week-Abduction-premiere.html
Now that the star is nearly done promoting Abduction, he 'wants to be single for a while [so that] he can properly move on', says the insider.
Bitches, they are too lazy to pretend one second longer than it's required for movie promotion.
Hollywood actor Ryan Gosling has kept a DUI arrest secret -- until now.
The 30-year-old star of "The Notebook" was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence back in 2005, Radar Online reported Thursday, citing a report in this week's Star Magazine.
The Canadian, who is currently starring as a stunt driver in the movie "Drive," was arrested by officers from the central Los Angeles station of the California Highway Patrol on March 17, 2005 according to Los Angeles County Superior Court.
He later pleaded "no contest" to a misdemeanor charge of "exhibiting speed," despite being originally charged with "driving under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs" and "driving with a blood alcohol content of 0.08 or greater."
"Exhibiting speed" is frequently negotiated as a plea bargain by defense attorneys as an alternative to a more severe DUI charge.
Gosling was sentenced to two years of probation and ordered to pay $849 in fines.
Trolly, please take your medication. Thanks in advance!
Taylor Lautner and Lily Collins 'have split' despite never having confirmed their relationship in the first place
Jesus, these fake relationships don't even bother to last past the opening weekend if the film tanks. I don't know if he's gay but that (Alex) Pettyfer kid and his supposed gf broke up the day after their movie opened and tanked.
Wow, what did I miss. Looks like trolly really derailed this time.
Trolly's medication doesn't work.
Poor trolly needs to medicate to get over his delusion that Jake is straight
Trolly knows that Jake is gay as a goose - he just wants people to believe Jake is straight.
What set the troll off today?
Trolly is bored.
KatyPurry4 @SuperLaurenLove Have sophia and austin really broke up ?? Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
18 hours ago
SuperLaurenLove @KatyPurry4 Sorry for late reply I was in twitter jail! I didn't know they were dating???? xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
18 hours ago
@KatyPurry4 @SuperLaurenLove Yea they were dating but I saw something but I don't think its true :) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and twitter jail lol ?? :)
15 hours ago
Horrible day here in NY Town. Rainy and wet and blergh.
23 Sep
OH MY GOD - JUST SAW JAKE GYLLENHAAL ON THE STREET. I WAS 1M AWAY FROM JAKE GYLLENHAAL. I AM HAVING A MOMENT.
24 Sep
http://twitter.com/#!/petstarr
Just saw Jake Gyllenhall walk by. He was like 8 feet away from me. I almost fainted.
23 Sep
http://twitter.com/#!/ReginaBlandon
I almost fainted.
DUH!!!
Pettyfer and Lautner have the same agent. They both flopped at the box office and had savage reviews, both announced splitting with their fake girlfriends on the day their movies released.
It's just to distract from the reviews and the terrible box office. It seems to have worked for the most part.
I see that Jake and Austin have finally achieved not being gossip fodder or blasted continuously about thier sexuality on blogs and comment sections by staying low and keeping a low profile. There is absoultely nothing to talk about. Even when a movie is released.
But some, (you know who, are still looking for pictures of the babytile and think they're doing a good job and hiding them.
Nothing there either.
Even when a movie is released.
Not a good sign for Jake's career.
Low profile would be even better if Jake would use it to work on something.
What do you call raising three babies? And another one on the way. Jake and Austin are both in NYC enjoying their babymoon.
What do you call raising three babies?
Insane OMG fiction.
Jake and Austin are both in NYC enjoying their babymoon.
Sure. Jake and Austin are in the same city at the same time every once in awhile so they must be parents with lots of kids. Duh!
That's your opinion. M&M has put together a very detailed timeline of various facets of Jake's life, and it is more than plausible that there are three children.
3:33 PM - not my opinion, those are are FACTS. You and OMG can lie and spin all you want, but you can't undo facts.
it is more than plausible that there are three children
Ted's BT wasn't enough so OMG had to make up more babies? I think that someone must be insane to really belive that 3 BTs bullshit.
M&M has put together a very detailed timeline of various facets of Jake's life, and it is more than plausible that there are three children.
^^^
What she forgets is that these two men don't have any interest in raising children at this "point" in their lives.
It shows!
OH oh, I know what might have happened. Jake and Austin had surrogate babies for a Nanny who could not get pregnant. So, that's it, they gave the babytiles to the Nanny. They're her children. So all Special, PG and M&M have to do is find this infamous Nanny. They need to get started immediately.
^^
And you know the Nanny knows how to raise children.
Jake and Austin are a poor excuse "at this point" in their life for being daddys. Here today, somewhere else tomorrow. Jetset acrosss the globe the next day. No babies out and about with them.
These two guys have more important and fun things to do like traveling to PR with Sophia and traveling on a train with dirty folk rockers who don't take a bath..
You know, FUN Stufff.
Oh the life of an independant free-spirit guy with no responsibilities.
All you can do is make tiresome snarky remarks, rude comments and pretend that you actually provide FACTS that there are no children (all I see are bitchy retorts, not FACTS).
3:56 PM - get a grip and start using your brain.
OMG and YOU have ZERO proof that Jake and Austin are still togeter or that there are any BT babies.
YOU and OMG have absolutely nothing that would suggest that BT or BTs exist. Your wishful thinking is just that.
"Argument" that BTs could exist because no one can prove that super secret kids don't exist is idiotic.
There is lots of evidence that could support the existence of one BT. It's all been discussed here, and all dates largely from the Reeke days. If you choose to believe there is no BT fine, but to say there is absolutely no evidence that could begin to support the existence of a BT is not accurate.
But I agree there is only one, and the babymoon talk is nonsense.
If you choose to believe there is no BT fine, but to say there is absolutely no evidence that could begin to support the existence of a BT is not accurate.
I was part of those discussions (Paris nanny video). That is not evidence, just something that can use for speculations.
The point is that years after Paris there is nothing to support "Jake is a father" speculation - just the opposite.
Look trolly, just accept that he is gay.
5:54 PM - stop insulting everyone's intelligence, this isn't OMG.
No this is bitchy WFT run by the biggest beyotch of all.
What's wrong with bitchy?
Damn 6:19 PM, you are a sore loser. LMAO!
Babymoon? *eyeroll*
It's possible that J&A might have a child, two maybe, but three and planning another really is beyond credibility. I think some just like to behave like babies themselves and get your goat. ;)
Babymoon?
That's what the OMG choir is singing at the moment. LOL!!
OMG "forgot" about small details like Austin not being in New York.
Jake and Austin are turning into the Two Men who lived in a Billy Reid boot, who had so many children they didn't know what to do! ;)
Prove that Austin isn't in New York! You can't? That proves he is in NYC with Jake!
The Catch-Austin 22.
These two guys have more important and fun things to do like traveling to PR with Sophia
Sophia was a beard.Bearding requires fake trips.
There is no difference between alleged Austin/Sophia Puerto Rico trip than Jake's trip with Reese W. to Cabo.
^^
Sorry cupcake, Don't believe Sophia has to beard for an up and coming actor like Austin.
She doesn't!
She could spend her time gettting laid for real instead of make believe and trying fool a hand full of slash and gay fans.
The OMG / slash / gay fans give themselves way too much credit and take themselves too serious.
So if I am to believe you, Sophia puts her life on hold of a real male / female relationship and "Real Sex", just to fool Ted and OMG readers? So that up and coming actor Austin Nichols can look str8? Not buying it.
Now bearding for Clooney, Pitt, Hanks, Denzel Washington you know, Major Stardom, could mean big things for the beard, but bearding for Austin Nichols?
lol what a joke
What's the payoff of drying up your "VaJayJay" because of inactivity while hanging around a gay man for many years so his small fanbase would think he's str8, you know, likes the Ladies?
Sophia Bush is a dumped beard. She can have as much sex as she wants. That is if she can find someone who would be interested.
And yes Austin is up and coming, at least when Jake is involved.
So if I am to believe you, Sophia puts her life on hold of a real male / female relationship and "Real Sex", just to fool Ted and OMG readers? So that up and coming actor Austin Nichols can look str8? Not buying it.
Wow. Have you got a lot to learn. You don't know how Hollywood bearding works, do you?
Tell me, cupcake- What was your couple Austin and Sophia doing this weekend?
Sophia constantly "dates" her costars. She only cares about her OTH universe. Sophia was rehearsing potential squeezes in 2009 like Robert Buckley, and Austin got the job. End of Story. She's a beard. Get over it!
Austin was with Jake this weekend. Sophia is tweeting into the early morning hours on a Friday night. Do the math.
"So if I am to believe you, Sophia puts her life on hold of a real male / female relationship and "Real Sex", just to fool Ted and OMG readers?"
Shes not putting her life on hold. She's racing,tweeting,going to fashion shows. Beards have their own life outside of the bearding life.
The Sophia/Austin bearding relationship seems to have lost its pulse which might explain Sophia's weekend with only her twitter account to keep her warm.
^^
Wow 11:47pm, YOU are A Sophia Bush stalker? Do you have a life of your own? Are you waiting for every Austin or Sophia tweet?
Sorry, you need help and a life.
The Sophia/Austin bearding relationship seems to have lost its pulse which might explain Sophia's weekend with only her twitter account to keep her warm.
Are you insane, nuts, Wacko, an All Seeing / All Knowing Psychic or just plain stupid?
How the h*ll do you know what she was doing all night. She could have been tweeting with a man, Austin, or any other fellow right there next her all night. Tweeting after dinner, brushing her teeth, SEX, or using the bathroom. What the hell are you talking about as if you know of her every move every freaking hour, minute, second of ((HER)) day.
jessh
Get a life of your own will you and stop following creepy tweets of people who don't know you Mr/Ms stalker.
Shes not putting her life on hold. She's racing,tweeting,going to fashion shows. Beards have their own life outside of the bearding life.
That same argument can be used equally for someone who is in a real M/F relationship. But of course, you can see or understand this. Because you don't Want To!!
Austin was with Jake this weekend. Sophia is tweeting into the early morning hours on a Friday night. Do the math.
What math?!? What tweeting has to do with Austin?
You have no idea where Austin was this weekend.
"She could have been tweeting with a man, Austin, or any other fellow right there next her all night. Tweeting after dinner, brushing her teeth, SEX, or using the bathroom"
The cellphone - the new trend in sex toys? Talk about up close and personal phone sex. LOL! Cellphone in the commode - sharing everything with the one you talk to.
Wow, justification is running rampant.
Feel sorry for your lovers, 12:02. They have to battle your phone for lovin' attention. How romantic & hot!
Latest UK study: 60% of women would choose shopping over sex.
7:01 AM - I still don't understand.
What Sophia's tweeting hours have to do with Austin or any other person? Please expain.
P.S. It is clear that her tweeting has nothing to do with Austin and Jake, and that so far there is no reason to believe Austin was in NYC.
The cellphone - the new trend in sex toys? Talk about up close and personal phone sex. LOL! Cellphone in the commode - sharing everything with the one you talk to. Wow, justification is running rampant.
Your playing stupid is too silly for words. Aren't you at least a bit embarrassed to post such bullshit?
Austin was with Jake this weekend. Sophia is tweeting into the early morning hours on a Friday night. Do the math.
J&A believers saying that Austin and Sophia are sleeping together??? Math and logic are too much for you! LOL
P.S. It is clear that her tweeting has nothing to do with Austin and Jake, and that so far there is no reason to believe Austin was in NYC.
Too funny for words. Backtracking much?
What has happened to Austin rather being in PR with Sophia than with Jake? Now it's understandable for Sophia to rather be snogging with her phone than with her boyfriend?
Did you see David Harbour (Randall in BBM) guest star in last night's premier episode of "Pan Am?"
What has happened to Austin rather being in PR with Sophia than with Jake? Now it's understandable for Sophia to rather be snogging with her phone than with her boyfriend?
For God's sake.
Austin was in PR with Sophia, we have photos as proof, and he was there instead of going to Jake in LA after OTH season filming was done.
Suggesting that Austin, Sophia's fake boyfriend, wasn't in Wilmington because Sophia tweeted "early morning hours on a Friday night" is simply idiotic.
I thought that the loons were sad because Austin wasn't posting as much as he used to?
didn't he just direct an episode of that shitty show? If so isn't he busy with editing, etc either in NC or L.A.?
Austin tweeted non-stop in the beginning to get a bunch of followers and to get attention with his causes, once that was done he only posted tweets occassionally, where Sophia continued because her fanbase is bigger.
Loons think that because he has down time that he has to run wherever Jake is like he has no life and friends/family seperate.
Anyway shouldn't they be home in L.A. with their kids??
Also Jake knows tons of people in NY friends and family.
Sophia continued because her fanbase is bigger
Her fanbase is bigger because she's working to make it bigger - that includes more tweets and more Twitter interaction with fans.
I think if there is a BT he or she is largely raised in NYC with Maggie's family. Jake spends more time in NYC than LA when he is not working.
Celebs not spending a lot of time with their kids is very common. DId you not see Musto's rant last week about how insane it is for celebs to have kids because most of them would drop spending time with the kid for the most trivial of work?
Sophia was in PR from what, a Sunday or Monday through the following Sunday? Austin didn't join her in PR until the end of the week. Not to mention I can't believe you're still ranting about PR. Jake went a million places with the Chin, and that didn't make it real. It is also clear she had a piece on the side, so please stop embarrassing yourself by talking about how Sophia wouldn't go without sex all these years, ergo Sophin is the real deal.
Yes and Austin knows that his OTH fanbase is linked to Sophia so no need to tweet as much, she's doing all the work.
Also, why do the loons always think that Austin has to drop and run every where Jake is, why can't Jake stop off in NC for example?
But OTH is over and Austin will look for other projects - he should work harder on his fanbase, it's not like he doesn't have time for that.
OTH is crap and he knows it but he's got more exposure and recognition from this than anything he has done. I'm sure he appreciates the fans and his higher profile but let's face it , this has to have a been a step backwards. Also I think Sophia is a lot more smarter regarding fans, especially soap fans where he isn't.
I bet she has her ducks in the row after OTH than Austin.
Also it seems to me that he has kinda adopted NC as a home so I wouldn't be surprised if he plans on sticking around after filming ends.
Sophia was in PR from what, a Sunday or Monday through the following Sunday? Austin didn't join her in PR until the end of the week. Not to mention I can't believe you're still ranting about PR.
That's because you choose to ignore the obvious:
1. we have very little FACTS about Jake & Austin
2. we aren't discussing Austin's bearding, we are discussing J&A having kid(s)
3. Austin choosed to take a short holiday instead spending time with his "husband and kids" - before going on holidays alone (Indonesia).
4. The point of Austin in PR = we have facts that suggest how Austin doesn't give a shit about being with Jake.
9:47: I thought the BT's were in L.A. or was it Austin, Tx or Silverlake, L.A. or Berekly, S.F.?
I'm confused.
mattkulper Matt Kulper
Yes. That's Jake Gyllenhaal. Dude loves his coffee. twitpic.com/6qxw24
3 hours ago
I think if there is a BT he or she is largely raised in NYC with Maggie's family. Jake spends more time in NYC than LA when he is not working. Celebs not spending a lot of time with their kids is very common.
Sorry, but that doesn't make sense. Kid isn't a plant so you aks your family to water it while you are away for few weeks or months. Why would Jake risk so much by having secret kid if he doesn't care about raising it?
Yes. That's Jake Gyllenhaal. Dude loves his coffee.
Loves his computer. Checking out WFT2?
Why would Jake risk so much by having secret kid if he doesn't care about raising it?
please stop asking Logical question. You know very well that the OMG, Babytile Kooks and the J/A romantic Loons cover their eyes and close their ears when these logical questions are asked. They just say "Stop acting stupid". LOL
Yes. That's Jake Gyllenhaal. Dude loves his coffee. twitpic.com/6qxw24
3 hours ago
3 hours ago was 7 AM in NYC. It that photo from this morning?
mattkulper Matt Kulper
Yes. That's Jake Gyllenhaal. Dude loves his coffee. http://twitpic.com/6qxw24
56 minutes ago
Yes. That's Jake Gyllenhaal.
^I think Jake was looking at OMG and pissing himself with laughter about how he is supposedly in NYC with hubby Austin on their BABYMOON (snicker)
DrunkEgo Jose Cuervo
Oh btw, I saw Jake Gyllenhaal in TriBeCa today brunching wit some other cute white dude
10 hours ago
SDotG_Man Steven G
Just bumped into Jake Gyllenhaal in front of Community ... Cool dude!
25 Sep
madMAJx Maj Dean Abuallan
Saw Jake Gyllenhaal on a corner in the city. Cool dude
25 Sep
Of course we were talking about bearding, but I guess you can't follow more than one discussion at a time. You love to throw crap and see what sticks, and when someone raises an argument you don't live you point to the other crap you've flung and say "we weren't talking about X". Someone at 9:57, 10:05, 12:02 and 12:11 is insisting that Sophia is not a beard.
Brangelina drag their kids all over the world with them, why do you think Jake would be any different?
Oh btw, I saw Jake Gyllenhaal in TriBeCa today brunching wit some other cute white dude
oH DANG! The "cute" description excludes Austin "Butt head" Nichols then.
Brangelina drag their kids all over the world with them, why do you think Jake would be any different?
Ummm, perhaps because he doesn't have any kids that he can drag around!
Of course we were talking about bearding, but I guess you can't follow more than one discussion at a time.
LOL, not even a nice try. Please read 10:03 AM comment again and cut the crap.
Of course we were talking about bearding, but I guess you can't follow more than one discussion at a time.
One more time, just for you - Austin bearding or not bearding isn't important because Austin can beard with Sophia without being Jake's "husband" - the fact that Austin has a beard doesn't prove that he's still with Jake.
So original 10:49
You love to throw crap and see what sticks, and when someone raises an argument you don't live you point to the other crap you've flung and say "we weren't talking about X".
What argument was that? Do tell if you can. I bet you made it up.
So original 10:49
You should try reading comments, too.
One more time, just for 11:01 AM #2 - Austin bearding or not bearding isn't important because Austin can beard with Sophia without being Jake's "husband" - the fact that Austin has a beard doesn't prove that he's still with Jake.
P.S. Austin being with Sophia would prove that he's not with Jake, but I don't expect to see their sex tape anytime soon.
Brangelina drag their kids all over the world with them, why do you think Jake would be any different?
You forgot that no one knows about Jake's kids, that they are his secret?
Oh btw, I saw Jake Gyllenhaal in TriBeCa today brunching wit some other cute white dude
10 hours ago
Just bumped into Jake Gyllenhaal in front of Community ... Cool dude!
25 Sep
Saw Jake Gyllenhaal on a corner in the city. Cool dude
25 Sep
Proof that Austin wasn't in NYC with Jake this weekend.
How are those tweets "proof". (I think you are yanking everyone's chain)
11:20 AM - are you saying that Jake would leave his "husband and kids" at home and go out on his own?
11:20 AM - is there any reason we should believe Austin was in NYC? Anything?
I asked how are those tweets proof Austin wasn't there. You still haven't answered. If there was a tweet about Austin in LA, then maybe you could call that "proof".
I asked how are those tweets proof Austin wasn't there. You still haven't answered.
I see.
You are saying that Jake would go out on his own and leave Austin and kids at home during one of rare occasions they were in the same city at the same time.
Unfuckingbelievable.
Most likely Austin was in NC working on that episode he directed, why would he fly anywhere if had to be on set Monday if he reall didn't need to.
And again, why not Jake flying to NC for the weekend? I'm sure Austin has a place there since he works there.
You still haven't answered. Now THAT's unfuckingbelievable. Talk about avoiding the question!
I believe Austin qualifies as a white cool dude.
And again, why not Jake flying to NC for the weekend?
Hmmm... what would be easier: hide kids at Maggie's or in some rented house in NC? (Don't think Austin could hide them in his place.)
^^ he can't hide what he don't have!
Get it..... duh
And why coudn't he? He must have a place there and i have yet to read or hear that OTH down in NC stalking the actors there. They do know where they hang out at bars and such but not where they live , just speculation.
And it would be impossible to hide kids in Park slope, Maggie, Peter and Ramona are a big part of that neighborhood and tounges would wag, especially Ramona's, be real.
Again, how come Jake never goes to NC?
Post a Comment