FAKE photo GOOD for your public image:
FAKE photo BAD for your public image - Call a lawyer as soon as possible!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Blog for those interested in the truth about Toothy Tile and Gray Goose
Search This Blog
Blog info
Toothy Tile Blind Items
Other places
Blog Archive
Disclaimer
This blog is for entertainment purposes only. Images used here within this blog belong to their respective copyright owners and no infrigement of copyright is ever intended.
StatCounter
2,181 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 1401 – 1600 of 2181 Newer› Newest»All we have are signs and opinions and very strong clues that Jake is gay, can you make me an example?
Yes, Jake has children. And, is not a child abuser.
Signs, opinions, clues, intuition.
which signs which clues which intuition? please illuminated me.
Yes, Jake has children.
How many? What are their names and ages?
Were you the gestational carrier?
Before Ted it spoke about gay Jake?
how can be thought that with Kiki was a False Relationship?
I agree. Jake is not a Father Knows Best kinda guy. He's human. Being gay, in the closet and with someone for ten years who is also a closeted actor, does not make one a saint. Still it's obvious to me he's a family man and lives a healthy life. In the world of Hollywierd I bet he's considered a choir boy next to many of the lowlifes that hang out there.
Yes, Jake has children.
How many? What are their names and ages?
Do your own research, lazy bones. I've done mine and have watched this charade play out for six years. Jake. Has. Children. Don't really care whether you want to believe it or not.
this history is grazing the grotesque one, dare admit it! Jake doesn't have any family with Austin and Ted it doesn't have any credibility!
Signs, opinions, clues, intuition.
You notice "fact" isn't included in this list. I think a good argument can be made for Jake being a gay parent, but without any facts, I certainly can't indict him as a child abuser for how he raises his possible child(ren) or criticize him mercilessly for anything else he's credited or discredited with. There's nothing wrong with believing what you believe, but a few of people on both sides of this fandom who are really cutthroat about it for some reason.
still I don't understand why one as Kiki she would have had to spend two years of her life to share a house a dog with someone who you surely say gay.It doesn't have some logical sense
I think that if Jake has a child/children then what he is doing does border on child abuse, of the psychological variety. A child who grows up being hidden why Jake is seen with and talks about Ramona is going to think there is something wrong with them. No kid is going to understand an explanation of "I did it to hide the fact I'm gay, not because I don't love you".
Regarding the incident of Toothy getting caught having sex with Goose, right around the time the same time Jake, who had broken up with Kiki by then, all of sudden went running back to her, and we got a whole flurry of pictures.
Kiki an Jake were hardly together the two years they supposedly lived together. They were always off filming, first Jake with TDAT and later Jarhead, then Kiki with Spiderman and Wimbledon.
"still I don't understand why one as Kiki she would have had to spend two years of her life to share a house a dog with someone who you surely say gay2
It happens all the time.Closeted gays that live happily with their het partners until the shit hits the fan.
We haven't been fed in ages and our pampers are stinking up the joint!
still I don't understand why one as Kiki she would have had to spend two years of her life to share a house a dog with someone who you surely say gay
LOL!
1. don't believe everything you read in tabloids - according to them Jake lived with the chin for 2 years(?), in reality he never left his LA home.
2. Jake and Kirsten were longer "off" than "on" during their on-off relationship, so there is no reason to believe they shared a house for a longer period of time.
which signs which clues which intuition? please illuminated me
Read OMG and WFT2 comments IF you are interested. Almost everything is there - all signs, clues, rumors and facts.
All we have are signs and opinions and very strong clues that Jake is gay, can you make me an example?
21 Oct 2007
I quote something he said about homosexuality: 'I don't think I'd be afraid of it if it happened.' What on earth did he mean by that? 'Nothing like that has ever happened to me. I live in a different world. What I was trying to say was why leave out possibilities in my life? It wasn't meant to be provocative.'
So let's get it on the record: is he saying he is open to persuasion? 'No, I am not open to persuasion myself, but the idea of homosexuality is acceptable to me. I grew up in a city where half the people I know are gay. Both of my godfathers are gay.'
Paul Newman is gay! He laughs again. 'No, he's my celebrity godfather.' What's a celebrity godfather? 'That's the godfather that the media give you. He's a close friend of my family. He taught me to drive. I have literal godfathers and celebrity godfathers.'
I see. And Jamie Lee Curtis, is she a celebrity godmother or a literal godmother? 'Both. That's why it is confusing growing up in Hollywood.'
OK, having established that he is not bisexual, was he being quite calculating when he allowed people to think he was? 'It was meant as a way of saying it was important for Heath [Ledger, his co-star in Brokeback Mountain] and I to have the movie exist as the movie, but also to have people know it was two straight actors playing those parts.'
I think I follow. The chemistry and tension wouldn't have worked as well if two gay actors had been playing those roles, and because they were both straight it made their sexual awkwardness more convincing, more like it might be for two cowboys. 'Exactly. Here are these two lonely people who find themselves through love. Love has no bounds and these two people found a connection in this massive, lonely landscape of Wyoming.'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/3668690/Jake-Gyllenhaal-Aggression-is-a-part-of-me.html
Still it's obvious to me he's a family man and lives a healthy life.
Healthy and kids-free life. Father doesn't leave kids behind to enjoy touring with a band. There is nothing to suggest that Jake is raising a family.
Do your own research, lazy bones. I've done mine and have watched this charade play out for six years. Jake. Has. Children.
There is nothing to research, Jake is gay but he's not a father. You are making kids up and you don't have any clues, rumors, facts nor indications that Jake has kids. Just Ted's BT gossip and your wishful thinking.
In the world of Hollywierd I bet he's considered a choir boy next to many of the lowlifes that hang out there.
Jake hiding his kids so he could make more money would make him lower than all Hollywood lowlifes.
There is nothing to research, Jake is gay but he's not a father
You're 50% correct. Jake's gay and a father. Like I said, you can continue to ignore the hundreds of clues since 2006. I don't really care. And, no Jake is not a lowlife. Mislead and confused, but not a bad guy. That stupid takeback interview from The Telegraph proves how Jake will lie with no problem. He was trying to come out in 2005-06, but he was pushed back into the closet. I don't blame him for going ahead and having the family anyway. In fact, I think that's why he wanted to come out in the first place.
Like I said, you can continue to ignore the hundreds of clues since 2006.
What clues? There are no clues that Jake is a father, but there are tons of clues that Jake and Austin aren't together.
There are plenty of clues and you have read them for years at WFT and OMG et al. They are all archived if you are interested and open minded. If you're not interested and are a rabid nonbeliever, that's fine too.
But Kirsten opened her heart to talk of her secret sadness at the break-up and her hopes for the future.
“Jake was the love of my life,” she said. “He was, is and always will be. “Despite what has happened, though, I still have this whole fairytale vision in my head because I was brought up on movies and storybooks that say I’m going to find my soulmate, get married and have a perfect life. “Maybe one day that will be with Jake.”
Kirsten, 24, who split with the 25-year-old Donnie Darko star last year, added: “Maybe I’m a weird girl and I just needed a good freak to match me.
“In Jake I believe I found that. He’s a dork. That’s what I love about him.
“But I felt that at the age of 22 I just wasn’t ready to settle for a long-term commitment. “I feel so young and there’s still so much to do and see. But I’m not seeing anyone else and as far as I know neither is he…”
She said: “Maybe some day it will work out for us. I’m sad this happened but my career is blossoming and I want to make the most of every moment.
“We’re two people who’ve been in love and the feelings we have for each other will remain very special.
“I don’t believe we’re finished for ever…and neither does he.”
whether to speak so if it had not been a true relationship?
A Grace always will miss her Will :´´)
Back in 2002, Kirsten Dunst and Jake Gyllenhaal were a really hot item. Now, she’s said to be super ticked off that he’s looking so much in love with new squeeze, Taylor Swift.
Jake and Kirsten dated for almost two years, but it was a long time ago. You would think that she would’ve gotten over any bitterness since. Apparently that’s not the case!
While doing the promotional rounds for her new movie, All Good Things, reporters asked her about GyllenSwift. One snapper asked if Kirsten thought the happy twosome would last, to which she responded, “Next!”
Not taking the hint, another reporter pushed the issue, saying that she MUST know something about it because she and Jake were together for so long. Again, snidely, she responded, “Next!”
Was it that good, Kirsten, that you’re still bitter eight years later???
5:13 PM - LMAO, thanks for a laugh! :)
“I don’t believe we’re finished for ever…and neither does he.”
LOL!
In reallity Jake doesn't give a fuck about Dunst:
November 19, 2009
Dunst told Allure, "It would be nice to see him. But we're not good friends."
http://www.stylecaster.com/celebrity/6570/kirsten-dunst-interview-on-jake-gyllenhaal-were-not-good-friends
There are plenty of clues and you have read them for years at WFT and OMG et al.
I've read them all over last 4 years, but nothing can be called a clue. There is nothing to suggest that Jake is a father or that he's still dating Austin.
And why they were not good friends if it were everything false?
And also with Reese, why a woman with that career an oscar two children she would have had to lend him to a thing of the kind?
Reese Witherspoon is a boring phony with a fake "I'm so blessed" public image who used closeted Jake to get tons of good publicity and get "revenge" when her husband dumped her for a younger woman.
And why they were not good friends if it were everything false?
Because Jake doesn't need Dunst to make him look "straight" anymore.
For almost three years then,I don't know it seems a whole little forced to me
Sorry but I don't succeed in seeing her this way. Why this hunger of publicity she has come only when she has met Jake and not first?, Doesn't she seem me really the type
That's because you don't know what you're talking about, you never noticed that celebrities are making millions of $$$ from publicity.
Because Jake doesn't need Dunst to make him look "straight" anymore.
this theory serves water as all the parts. Why really while it was raging the polemic on BBMt and the questions on hisr sexuality he would have had to free himself of his beautiful famous blond fiancée?
What fiancée? Dunst wasn't anyone's fiancée.
BBMt has nothing to do with questions about Jake's sexuality, his good times with Austin have.
That's because you don't know what you're talking about, you never noticed that celebrities are making millions of $$$ from publicity.
didn't Reese already earn enough? she was not more famous than him respected and the paiddest actress of HW?
That was just one of Witherspoon's publicity lies. Earn enough? She is still making bad movies, isn't she?
BBMt has nothing to do with questions about Jake's sexuality, his good times with Austin have.
your affirmations don't have logic. how can you separate the sexuality of Jake from Kiki that has been with him for two years?
Jake and Dunst weren't together for two years and Jake was fucking men while he was with Dunst.
Jake and Dunst weren't together for two years and Jake was fucking men while he was with Dunst.
how do you do to know it? and how come one drugged unstable as kiki has not blabbed everything to the press if she were so angry?
I know the truth it is painful
Yes, Jake Gyllenhaal is gay as a goose truth is painful for so many!
how come one drugged unstable as kiki has not blabbed everything to the press if she were so angry?
Sorry but you obviously don't know anything about Hollywood publicity, gay closet and tabloids so this discussion doesn't have much point.
I imagine to me kiki in rehab in crisis of abstinence worried about her relationship with gossip and tabloids and HW publicity.Please
Yes, Jake Gyllenhaal is gay as a goose truth is painful for so many!
I think that this is only a part of the truth and it doesn't make hurt at all, I believe that jake also likes the women
and it doesn't certainly have a marriage and three hidden children
Anna Kendrick (love her!) is in talks to play Jake's wife in the movie.
(Just an aside, dear, if you are going to quote an article, kindly do so in its entirety.)
The article is out there and available in its entirety for anyone who wants to read the entire piece of.....written work. You can stick your 'dear' where it hurts the most.
She's doing a great thing, and she doesn't need to be physically in Afghanistan, in fact, I think it's better that she isn't, and is working with a seasoned journalist.
Spoken just like a true OTH'er and Sophia fan. Give me a break, if Sophia wants to get her information via Skype, she's just going to be transcribing what Karen Day tells her. So skip the middle man and just let Karen Day put out the article. Sophia isn't needed.
Oh, please. I never watch OTH, and I'm not a Sophia fan.
And back up there, Sparky, when you post only certain paragraphs meant to prove your own point, you give a deliberately false impression, because you know that not everyone will take the time to read the entire article. Many writers, professional and not, write opinion pieces without actually being physically at the place they are writing about. What Sophia haters don't want to acknowledge that it is much too dangerous for her or anyone to be there. But she seems to have an interest, so why not write about it with her own commentary added to Karen Day's - hardly a transcription.
but is this OTH a Show Of Success?
No, I don't think so - maybe with a certain demographic. It's just not my cup of tea, but some may like it.
does it have accepted Jake the role in" You See Me?"
Ten to one its the troll voting furiously. Nothing else to do and no friends to do it with.
And back up there, Sparky, when you post only certain paragraphs meant to prove your own point, you give a deliberately false impression
Don't be silly - that was posted as illustration of Sophia's shitty article.
Why, @MarieClaire? Why? http://ow.ly/5fUIP What editor could possibly think this a good idea?
@AzmatZahra you are so so right! (I also cannot believe how proud Sophia Bush is put her inner idiot on full display)
12 Jun
But she seems to have an interest
Sophia Bush is always interested in all ways to promote herself.
I believe that jake also likes the women
Jake likes women, Ricky likes women, most of gays like women - but they don't have sex with them.
Anna Kendrick (love her!) is in talks to play Jake's wife in the movie.
Wife? Damn, Jake is still 25 in my mind.
Anna Kendrick (Scott Pilgrim vs. The World) and Natalie Martinez (Death Race) are in talks to star in the gritty cop drama End of Watch. Directed by David Ayers (Street Kings), the two will join a bald-headed Jake Gyllenhaal and Michael Peña. Ayers directs from a script that he wrote, which centers on the friendship between two seasoned police officers in Los Angeles. Variety reports that the actresses will play the love interests of Gyllenhaal and Peña, though doesn’t state which actress is paired up with which actor.
Ayer is no stranger to cop dramas, having made his directorial debut with 2005’s Harsh Times. He also penned the screenplays for The Fast and the Furious, Training Day and S.W.A.T. I’m a big fan of Kendrick’s, and Gyllenhaal can be great with good material, so hopefully everything comes together for End of Watch.
http://collider.com/anna-kendrick-end-of-watch-natalie-martinez/96410/
Michael Peña's "wife" is hot! Sorry Jake.
Stupid trolly.
doesn’t state which actress is paired up with which actor
Michael Peña is Latino. Natalie Martinez is Latina. Duh!
June 12 - Jogging With Peter In Santa Monica
IHJ gallery
June 12 - Lunch With Peter In Venice, CA
IHJ gallery
Ricky likes women who Ricky is?
Ricky Martin.
Jonathan and Lea Michele
Jonathan Groff, openly gay actor, likes women too - so much that he holds hands with them in public :)
is it him the boyfriend of ZQ?
Yes.
Who is this ZQ?
Actor Zachary Quinto.
Jonathan Groff, openly gay actor, likes women too - so much that he holds hands with them in public :)
As we can see, Jonathan is straight, straight, straight!
Will they stop the Bush to bother the Afghans sooner or later?
Sophia, we are waiting for you! Please don't forget to pack your stilettos!
Please don't forget to pack your stilettos!
surely a good of first necessity that is scarce in Afghanistan
likes women too - so much that he holds hands with them in public :)
and then what I have to think when I see to walk Jake with Atticus?;)?
8:55 AM Those kind of phrases aren't funny anymore,actually they never were. Time to come up with something new,dear.
Everyone thinks "That dog is gorgeous!"
^^LOL
Hey wait a minute - stilettos just aren't beautiful sexy works of wearable sculpture you know, they can serve as a good weapon in a pinch. They don't call them stilettos for nothing! ;)
Thanks Jackie for cleaning up the blog.
Trolly is ALWAYS here, ready to post some insult or some bullshit. LOL
they can serve as a good weapon in a pinch. They don't call them stilettos for nothing! ;)
Sophia will use them to kill some elusive head Taleban with her cry of battle "justice is done in name of Prada"
It's very entertaining. :)
LOL
Those kind of phrases aren't funny anymore,actually they never were. Time to come up with something new,dear.
oh no I have lost the not amusing sentence
thanks:)
Not amusing sentence was one of trolly's PUSSY posts. Not amusing, just stupid.
I have understood, the usual elegant and peaceful comments thanks:)
Sophia will use them to kill some elusive head Taleban with her cry of battle "justice is done in name of Prada"
Ha! LOL - This would be a good line to use in another Sex and the City movie. Or Louboutins. :)
A report was just released that Afghanistan is the most dangerous country in the world for women.
another Sex and the City movie frighten me more than Afghanistan:)
Where are my stilettos?
LOL :)
Where are my stilettos?
thrusted in the middle of the eyes of some democratic elk
Ay! Can't wait for another Sex and the City movie!
Awful Truth - Toothy and Grey: True Luv 4eva!
Like it was ever even a question! Fifty-six percent of you believe it's time for Toothy Tile to face the music and open that closet door, with hubby Grey Goose lovingly at his side, of course! And we agree. It's been a decade, can you even imagine the party Team Truth would throw if T2 said "I'm here, I'm queer, get used to it!"
Looks like Ted has just confirmed that Jake and Austin are married, as he called GG "hubby". How cute and romantic <33 :)
^^ Total BULLSHIT !! ^^
Ted's At it again. LOL
Some are jumping for JOY
He's still pulling strings for the Needy. (SAD)
Sorry 10:56am, but Ted gives us secret clues all the time. Why so bitter? You should be happy for the wedded duo.
Talk is cheap. No holidays together, no birthdays together, spending time somewhere else when they could be together = Jake and Austin aren't together, facts are stronger than Ted's stories about Jake's "hubby".
You should be happy for the wedded duo.
I'm sad because now J/A believers are much worse than babblers :(
that closet door, with hubby Grey Goose lovingly at his side
No BTs by their side?
Oops!
Natalie Portman welcomes a baby boy. Congratulations!
Ay! Can't wait for another Sex and the City movie!
good and with Sarah Jessica you are already in two!;)
Natalie Portman welcomes a baby boy. Congratulations!
how nice now the child of Nat can play with the children of Jake...... ops! wait a moment Ted has just said that in the closet not there and any child! what a pity
^^I just saw some stiletto pumps in camo. Perfect for Afghanistan! :)
Congrats to Nat!
I just saw some stiletto pumps in camo. Perfect for Afghanistan! :)
I bet that if Dick Cheney sees her personally gives her! Will you tell how Dick to know Sophia? from the poster that her daughter has hung in her bedroom ;)
I'm sad because now J/A believers are much worse than babblers :(
^^^
I AGREE !
Needy, Wishful and hopelessly ramantics fans of Gay Jake/Austin with babies being strung on by the nose of Ted's Antics and Words.
Nothing J/A does points towards this. Then they talk about Hollywierd. It anything Ted says about J/A were true, TMZ would have posted this shit 5 years ago. They are relentless, have no morals and take no prisoners when it comes to being first with the story. They can't be bought.
And they talk about babblers??
11:38am do you think Jake is gay?
What Jake being gay has to do with J/A?
Jake can't be gay if he's not with Austin? Jake can't be gay if we don't believe Ted's J/A and BT stories?
I think he likes both sexes and will lean towards being with a woman for now. I believe he and Austin's fling they ((had)) years ago is over. I think they are just friends. No marriage, living arrangements or babies.
Do I think J/A were involved years ago, YES!
I think he likes both sexes and will lean towards being with a woman for now.
Like he "was with" Taylor Swift? LMAO
11:52 who the hell cares about Taylor Swift? Apparently you do. Whatever the Tabs wrote, it's obvious they were friends. Why are you so threatened by this?
Whatever the Tabs wrote, it's obvious they were friends.
You can't be serious. Or maybe you didn't see twitter photos, when they didn't pose for paparazzi.
And no one is threatened by Jake's silly beard (WTF is there to be threatened about???) - just amused by Jake's stupidity.
11:52 who the hell cares about Taylor Swift?
Please LEARN to read.
Comment: I think he likes both sexes and will lean towards being with a woman for now.
Reply: Like he "was with" Taylor Swift? LMAO
11:52 who the hell cares about Taylor Swift?
Apparently you are still pissed off by Jake's choice of beards. GOOD! :)
Apparently you are still pissed off by Jake's choice of beards. GOOD! :)
LOL :)
LOL
12:04 apparently you are only pleased if Jake is seen only with men or some gay OUT Man. I know you would love for him to hang out with Adam Lambert, NPH etc, but when he's in the present of any female, the Jake is gay fans go absolutely beserk. They get worked up in a frenzy. Then the knives and fangs come out.
No need for it. It makes no sense.
who is NPH?
but when he's in the present of any female, the Jake is gay fans go absolutely beserk
You enjoyed seenig Jake making a fool of himself and posing for Us Weekly with his fake girlfriend Swift?
No need for it. It makes no sense.
I'm sure you would LOVE if people would buy Jake's bullshit and wouldn't laugh at him and his beards. Don't count on that.
Neil Patrick Harris
You enjoyed seenig Jake making a fool of himself and posing for Us Weekly with his fake girlfriend Swift?
Yes! The famewhore deserved the ridicule
why it is so unbelievable that were together indeed?
LMAO!!!
WHAT?
Showmance with Taylor Swift was 10 times less convincing than showmance with Reese Witherspoon. They were beyond pathetic.
but why?
P.S. Check out old comments, from that time, if you are interested in details. Like when Us Weekly was caught in "Jake attended Taylor's birthday party" lie.
Or to see how Taylor and Maggie posed for paparazzi at the same location they used for Jake and Taylor Us Weekly photos.
LOL!
but why someone of so famous and to the apex of the career as Tylor Swift should make a similar stupidity? it doesn't have sense
12:50 PM - you need to know basic things about show business, publicity, marketing, tabloids and gay closet in order to understand it.
and why a respected serious person and reserved as Maggie would lend herself and her child to all of this?
you need to know basic things about show business, publicity, marketing, tabloids and gay closet in order to understand it.
Maybe, but this whole thing is not convenient for her that in this moment it is that really famous therefore whether to risk
but why someone of so famous and to the apex of the career as Tylor Swift should make a similar stupidity?
Taylor Swift can't really sing and she sings average songs.
Her team is good at marketing - selling her image and songs.
She needs publicty for that, she has to be interesting, needs to get press.
That's why Taylor Swift likes to beard for popular gays like Taylor Lautner and Jake Gyllenhaal - boring girl gets tons of publicity for her "dating" and her songs about "her dating".
Ergo publicity = $$$
she has sold million of copies without jake or tylor and if she cannot sing the publicity she should be of quality and not of quantity. then why someone of so " chatted" as Jake?
People don't need to know to sing in order to be pop stars.
Why Jake? Swift's and Jake's people thought that showmance would be a good idea. They were wrong. Everyone makes mistakes.
but why someone of so famous and to the apex of the career as Tylor Swift should make a similar stupidity? it doesn't have sense
^^^^ extremely high maintenance poster and time consuming. Not sure if they are as uninformed as they are trying to sound. I've heard rumors of a similar type poster who dominates threads on IHJ.
Anyone who buys Jake w/Taylor or Reese - there are no words to describe.
I've heard rumors of a similar type poster who dominates threads on IHJ
Fingers crossed it's a JiG poster, lol :)
what is this JIG please
Jake is Gay
Why Jake? Swift's and Jake's people thought that showmance would be a good idea. They were wrong. Everyone makes mistakes.
It is a so stupid thing that has to be true, otherwise the PR of both them two should be stoned in the public plaza
What has to be true?
and nobody has still responded me on Maggie, to her it doesn't rub anything of the publicity, it is not Paris Hilton
their relationship
2:49 PM - are you trolling WFT2 for fun or are you really so ignorant that you're buying such obvious showmance for a real relationship?
and nobody has still responded me on Maggie
Why would anyone answer your newbie questions?
So you could trash people who were kind enough to answer? You are too lazy to read old comments?
the second that you have said I guess, I don't buy anything to closed box neither "showmance" neither the theory "Jake is absolutely gay because it tells Ted and I desireit so much." I want to think with my head and I set accordingly questions
I want to think with my head
That is the best way, but in that case you should do your own research - you have 4 years of articles, videos and photos to check out, something we already did.
3:00pm, I would suggest going back through all the threads of WFT2 starting with October 2007 when Reeke first came out.
All the theories and observations are there.
contrarily I appreciate a lot the gentleness of whom has the patience to answer me, and they do with intelligence and correctness and without seeming Tom C that speaks of Scientology. Don't you ever have any doubt?
That is the best way, but in that case you should do your own research - you have 4 years of articles, videos and photos to check out, something we already did.
it is not nice to make to feel me as the student that the lesson doesn't know, if it is so clear why you cannot be explained in two words? Do it seem as an illegible hieroglyph and me I am not Relic Hunter
I have followed Jake's showmance with Reese Witherspoon from the very beginning - November 2006. There is no doubt for me that they were 100% fake.
it is not nice to make to feel me as the student that the lesson doesn't know, if it is so clear why you cannot be explained in two words?
No one can explain Hollywood publicity, way tabloids work, gay closet and showmances in 2 words to someone who has no clue about those things. One more time - we had 4 YEARS to research, and discuss and learn.
yes I have understood but why?
Because we are Jake Gyllenhaal fans and people interested in real gossip, not tabloid and PR lies.
also I am a fan of Jake and it is for this motive that I seek the truth and I am not satisfied what I would like that he would be
" I am not satisfied what I would like that he would be"
Don't understand, please explain.
yes I'm sorry, English is not my language, I am trying to learn, I wanted to say that I would like if Jake were gay happily gotten married and with children but unfortunately I believe is not in this way and for honest intellectual I try to say /it
I believe Jake is gay, but I don't believe he's with Austin (anymore) and I don't believe he has kids.
I think that Jake is bisexual that with Austin there has been something, but this doesn't automatically make false his relationships with the women
I've said it 10.000 times before, I'll repeat it again - Jake is faking relationships with women because he's gay. There are tons of proof that Jake's heterosexual "relationships" are showmances - if you care to look.
you can also tell it 20.000 times if you are not convincing perhaps the problem it is your credibility, however make me an example without enunciating the whole theory
hallo.....any believable and spendable example as usual
4:05 PM - you are talking about credibility??????????????
I don't care what you believe and I don't want to convince you anything. If you want to contribute to the discussion you are welcome, but keep in mind that no one here has a duty to prove anything to you.
any believable and spendable example
Example of what?
if you sell off a theory for the Bible and for more on another human being, you absolutely have the duty to try it, they are the rules of the to civilly discuss I would say ,and you don't have to give me the permission to participate in a discussion, my opinion is worth how much yours and anyway to ask is permissible to answer it is courtesy
Example of what?
to form me an opinion more possible neighbor to the truth and that it is based on concrete factors and not on desires
if you sell off a theory for the Bible and for more on another human being, you absolutely have the duty to try it
No one is selling anything - I don't care what you believe and don't care abut changing your mind.
ok the discussion in this case ends here good evening
and you don't have to give me the permission to participate in a discussion, my opinion is worth how much yours
No one talked about the permission to discuss - you misunderstood.
You didn't follow Jake like people who post here for years so no, your opinion about Jake's sexuality isn't worth much here.
and does Jake know that in this sacred blog is deposited the truth on its sexuality?and in the case it owed him to make a comment it would matter his of opinion considering that it doesn't have never post here exactly as me? to Always Speak Of Stars doesn't Do Of You An Astronaut
4:53 PM - you don't know anything about gay closet, showmances, Hollywood publicity machine. You didn't follow Jake's "relationships" with Witherspoon and Swift. YOU made it clear that you aren't informed well. Your opinion about Jake's sexuality is based on very little. So how can your opinion matter when you know so little?
have you ever felt to speak of intuition? or it is only perhaps the fortune of the beginner, however with all of your great wisdom still you have not to give me a spendable example
to form me an opinion more possible neighbor to the truth and that it is based on concrete factors and not on desires
Do you post on "Jake is straight" blogs that their opinion is based on their desires? Do you ask them to prove it? Of course you don't, only people who believe Jake is gay could be wrong.
have you ever felt to speak of intuition? or it is only perhaps the fortune of the beginner, however with all of your great wisdom still you have not to give me a spendable example
We did post a few examples, but you just don't get it. Or you ignore them.
no no for me the two theories have the same value, if you affirm with essential conviction that Jake is straight you have to exactly show it as whoever he affirms that is not it
doesn't it seem me however if I have been so blind not to see them or so stupid not to understand you could kindly propose me them?
any example still? my ignorance on the matter is comparable only with your reticence
Here is an example - Jake didn't bother to celebrate Swift's birthday with her, so Us Weekly posted fiction about the birthday party and deleted the article after everyone found out that Jake was in LA, not Nashville:
US Weekly said...
Exclusive: "Cuddly" Taylor and Jake "Obsessed" With One Another at B-Day
A partygoer tells US Swift and Gyllenhaal were inseparable at her booze-free soiree
Jake Gyllenhaal was all the intoxication Taylor Swift needed at her 21st birthday party at her Nashville home on Monday night.
A source tells UsMagazine.com that Swift celebrated her big milestone with Gyllenhaal, close pals and no booze at a "small" and "super low key" bash at home. ...
WFT2 comments from Dec 14, 2011
Start reading from December 14, 2010 10:30 AM comment.
no no for me the two theories have the same value, if you affirm with essential conviction that Jake is straight you have to exactly show it as whoever he affirms that is not it
One more time: did you ever ask some Jake fan to prove that Jake is straight?
Post a Comment