Monday, 4 April 2011

Brokeback Mountain: Personal Impact

By Nathan Donarum

In high school, I always loved movies; yet, I always looked at them passively. Only rarely did I become involved in the events or with the characters I saw on screen. In fact, prior to Brokeback Mountain I can't think of a single instance when I felt a profound emotional reaction to a film. I remember getting a little choked up while watching the end of Jonathan Demme's Philadelphia, but that's as close as it ever got to my becoming emotionally invested in situations taking place in a movie.

I watched Brokeback Mountain with my father on opening weekend back in late 2005 — though we had actually gone to see Capote instead. When we tried to buy tickets, we realized there was only one showing of Capote four or five hours later. Brokeback Mountain, however, was playing in just an hour; so, we bought two tickets and went to Borders to wait.

Since at the store they had a display with E. Annie Proulx's short story, my father and I each grabbed a copy and read it while we waited to see the movie, which had been getting phenomenal reviews. Curiously, I remember feeling underwhelmed by the short story. I thought to myself, "I don't even know if I'm excited to see this movie anymore." But since we had already bought the tickets, there wasn't really any turning back.

Jack and Ennis
Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger in "Brokeback Mountain"

After the hour passed, we went in. As I sat there watching Brokeback Mountain unfold, something changed within me. I don't know what caused it exactly, but I remember that I started crying when Gustavo Santaolalla's "The Wings" began playing while Jack and Ennis are at the campfire. I had never, ever cried because of a movie. And frankly, I did not understand how or why anyone would. Still, as I sat there in the theater, I could not contain my tears.

Eventually, I stopped crying, but the tears began streaming down once again when Ennis collects Jack's shirt and hugs it, fighting to hold on to the man he loved. I shed more tears at the end of the film, when Ennis opens his closet door, looks at the shirt, and the credits slowly start to roll.

I don't know why, but ever since that first time I saw Brokeback Mountain, my entire movie-watching experience has been radically different. After that, I have revisited movies I had seen before; suddenly, I was looking at them in a new light; at times, I was able to connect with them where before I had been emotionally and/or intellectually detached.

In addition, whether or not I'm watching a movie for the first time, I have been able to find layers to characters and settings that would have been out of my reach before. In essence, Brokeback Mountain made me realize how much I truly love the art of film. It also inspired me to start writing about it.

I mustered the courage to start posting my film commentaries online only in 2008 or whereabouts, but I had never considered writing about movies prior to Brokeback Mountain. In a profound way, that same-sex love story set in the American West made me realize there were tangible differences between bad cinema, good cinema, and great cinema. Needless to say, I'm fully aware that my Brokeback Mountain experience was exceptional, for having such a visceral response to any film is something quite unique.

Even though I cannot fully explain my personal reaction to the film, I must credit the filmmakers for it. Had Brokeback Mountain not been crafted the way it was, I find it impossible to believe that I would have been so deeply affected by it. After all, I had felt quite unenthusiastic after reading E. Annie Proulx's short story.

I have watched Brokeback Mountain many times since that first viewing. My experience has been different each time, but the film's power has never been lost. As we grow, our experiences change; our hope is that they will change not for the worse, but for the better. Thanks to Brokeback Mountain, I can happily say that mine have been forever changed for the better.

Source: Meditations on BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN: Multilayered Love Story

2,704 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   1201 – 1400 of 2704   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

OK, pictures with Busy are from LA concert.

So after that concert Jake left LA and went to Arizona with the band. That's is even worse scenario for people who believe that Jake and Asutin are still together.

Jake said...

That's something to celebrate, don't you think?

DUH!!! Marcus and I are celebrating since Friday!

Austin said...

DUH!!! Marcus and I are celebrating since Friday!

You bastard! You say you are going out to get me a birthday present and you take off to Arizona with him?

Anonymous said...

That's is even worse scenario for people who believe that Jake and Asutin are still together.

Why would that be? Austin has proven he is capable of traveling; he does not have a traveling phobia. Why would he not be able to have been at Arizona? We have no idea where Austin was Friday. Yesterday. Or today.

The BT Bunch said...

Why would he not be able to have been at Arizona? We have no idea where Austin was Friday. Yesterday. Or today.

He stayed home with us and played shadow puppets. We don't like Mumford & Sons. It disappoints Daddy Jake greatly, but fuck him since he shaved his head, he scares the shit out of us.

Anonymous said...

Why would Austin travel to Arizona? To take care not to be seen with Jake in public? What about BT?

Atticus said...

I'm hungry!

Anonymous said...

Jake backstage at Mumford & Sons.

Backstage

Anonymous said...

Maybe Jake is following the band so closely because he's dating one of the guys in the band or a sibling of one of the band members. My personal opinion is that Jake is gay but him and Austin are no longer a couple. Maybe just good friends.

Anonymous said...

Or maybe he's friends with the band and was invited on this mini tour. It's not always about fucking.

Anonymous said...

Or maybe he's friends with the band and was invited on this mini tour. It's not always about fucking.

after reading the post about the bearded guy being Austin and he and Jake hooking up for his birthday, the above post seems to be the most sane theory.
It's obvious Jake likes music, bands and know some of these guys. He seems to know a number of popular artist/musicians persoally. Jake and Austin are only friends now is my opinion also.
Nobody here knows if Busy husband is with her but not by her side when pictures were taking. Talk about jumping to conclusions. Why would Austin parade in a costume to hide from OMG and Wft2 regulars. Nope, don't see it and it makes no sense.

Anonymous said...

No one said Austin was the bearded guy. Just that they look alike. And Austin does not wear costumes or disguises to hide from OMG or WFT2. He does it because Jake is in the closet so they hide from everyone.

Anonymous said...

No one said Austin was the bearded guy.
Some people said Austin could do that: "Austin is there and he could be dressed up to look like the guy from Mumford & Sons. I can see Jake and Austin laughing about him dressing up like one of the band members just to irritate people, like the troll here today."

Anonymous said...

And Austin does not wear costumes or disguises to hide from OMG or WFT2. He does it because Jake is in the closet so they hide from everyone.

Austin wears costumes and disguises and goes out with Jake like that? You really believe that? What kind of costumes and disguises? Anyone saw Austin doing that or is that just a theory?

Anonymous said...

I can see Jake and Austin laughing about him dressing up like one of the band members just to irritate people, like the troll here today

The only peeps laughing are those who know this is just lunacy!

Maybe Austin dressed up to look like Busy Philipps!!

Anonymous said...

somthinboutmary: Mumford and Sons, Old Crow Medicine Show, Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeroes, Jake Gyllenhaal, and Carey Mulligan. BEST. EASTER. EVER.
about 9 hours ago

Anonymous said...

dannyacosta: Mumford. Mumford. Sons. Edward Zeroes. Old Crowww! Magnetic Meds. Lance Armstrong. Jake Gyllenhaal. @RailroadRevival #Marfa #bestconcertever
about 7 hours ago

prairiegirl said...

I can see Jake and Austin laughing about him dressing up like one of the band members just to irritate people, like the troll here today."

"I can see" is not the same as saying that's Austin without a doubt and you better believe it.

After further studying, a couple of us have ruled out the above theory. Not because someone "says so" but because we ourselves did our own looking.

Jake is in the closet. Austin's in the closet. They both lie and they're hiding events and people in their personal lives.

Because of Twitter, Facebook, paparazzi, Tumbler and Flickr, these celebrities are aware of things leaking out and getting picked.

For someone like Jake who rarely appears anymore for the paps without pre-planning, frequenting a place where he & his people know he's going to be papped, or they themselves calling ahead, it totally makes sense that sometimes Austin might have to wear some props or else sit 20 rows back from Jake in order for them to do something together.

For those who are going to say he can't control the paps, that won't cut it for LAX. Jake can fly under the radar when he wants to. He lets his picture be floated when he needs it.

Some of Jake's fans need to face up to the truth that the guy manipulates and he has lied because he is still deep in the closet.

prairiegirl said...

Mu

picked = pic'd.

Anonymous said...

Sunday 24 April 2011
Mumford & Sons, Edward Sharpe & The Magnetic Zeros, and Old Crow Medicine Show
at El Cosmico Marfa, TX, US


Jake is in TX with the band.

Anonymous said...

it totally makes sense that sometimes Austin might have to wear some props or else sit 20 rows back from Jake in order for them to do something together

You are using this silly theories just to distruct attention from things we do know: Jake and Austin don't give a shit about being together (in the same city at the same time).
Mumford & Sons is the latest example - Jake prefered to spend weekend on the road with them instead celebrating birthday with Austin and "BT".

^^^^ said...

Jake and Austin don't give a shit about being together in private

Anonymous said...

P.S. I hope Michelle gets the role.

Crossing my fingers for Michelle too.

Talking about the Oz movie. Am I the only one who thinks Mila Kunis is overrated, acting and looks? She was ok in BS, but let's face it, it was Natalie's one woman show all the way and Kunis mostly rode along Natalie's wave of success. I doubt Kunis will have longevity as a serious actress. IMO of course.

Anonymous said...

For those who are going to say he can't control the paps, that won't cut it for LAX. Jake can fly under the radar when he wants to.

Jake can't control people with mobile phones who use Twitter, Facebook and blogs.

Anonymous said...

Do you mean she won't have longevity doing serious roles or she won't have longevity as an actress in general? She's been acting since 1998 but I think her forte is comedy. Good for her stepping out of the box and doing drama.

Anonymous said...

Do you mean she won't have longevity doing serious roles or she won't have longevity as an actress in general? She's been acting since 1998 but I think her forte is comedy. Good for her stepping out of the box and doing drama.

I don't see longevity with serious drama roles. Yeah, with fluffy comedy she could be successful as long as she's still young and perceived as pretty by men.

Anonymous said...

For someone like Jake who rarely appears anymore for the paps without pre-planning, frequenting a place where he & his people know he's going to be papped, or they themselves calling ahead, it totally makes sense that sometimes Austin might have to wear some props or else sit 20 rows back from Jake in order for them to do something together.

LOL none of that comment makes sense in the real world.

Anonymous said...

Mila Kunis may not be the best of actresses but she's a real beauty.

Anonymous said...

Mila Kunis may not be the best of actresses but she's a real beauty.

You think so? To me she looks pretty but not in a sophisticated rather in a cheap way.

From the actresses her age group, I think Natalie is pretty, Michelle too (I mean if you check her candids, she looks top notch w/o an inch of make up)and Scarlett Johansson.

Anonymous said...

It's called an opinion 7:29 AM.

Anonymous said...

It's called an opinion 7:29 AM.

I wasn't critisizing your opinion. We have to agree to disagree on that. And that's fine.

Anonymous said...

I'm not 7:26 but I concur; Mila is a very attractive girl. Though what we find beautiful/attractive is very much in the eye of the beholder. For instance I don't find either Natalie or Michelle beautiful or attractive, but you do. There is no right or wrong answer here.

Anonymous said...

There is no right or wrong answer here.

Of course. As I've initially stated, it' just my opinion. It would be boring if we all shared the same opinion. ;)

Anonymous said...

Mila has a smoldering quality about her in addition to her attractiveness. Some women are beautiful, but they don't have that sexy quality. I think some may misinterpret that sexy quality as "cheap", who knows why. A lot of women are threatened by it, because it drives men wild.

Anonymous said...

^^straight men, that is. And she's probably got lots of gay male friends too.

Anonymous said...

I think some may misinterpret that sexy quality as "cheap", who knows why.

I'm not threatened by sexy women. I just don't find Mila sexy. I.e. I find Angelina Jolie sexy.

I'm not a jealous type. I don't think I have a reason to be.

Anonymous said...

Yes, Mila has that Angelina Jolie quality, ITA.

8:10 AM said...

Many of my friends, though, find Angelina disgusting. I don't think they are jealous either. IRL I'm one of the few to find AJ attractive. The internet seems full of Angie/Brangelina worshippers though. My friends compare her to Aniston and would prefer Aniston to Jolie. I for one find Aniston very unattractive and think she has a boring personality and she also started messing with botox.

Anonymous said...

Mila Kunis looks like a sexy little doll, both beautiful and sensual. That's quite the combination. I don't think she look cheap at all.

Anonymous said...

The woman JGL is supposedly with has that sexy look too (the one in Morgan's Date With Destiny). Go Joe! :)

Anonymous said...

*looks

Anonymous said...

Yes, Mila has that Angelina Jolie quality, ITA.

To you. To me not so much. ;)

I noticed we have a lot of Mila fans here.

To stay on topic, did you hear she's dating Justin Timberlake?
Wonder if he broke up with Biel because of her?

Anonymous said...

Sensual, that's the word I was looking for! Angelina's lips are of course gorgeous. I like Jen too, she's a different kind of beauty.

Anonymous said...

I don't know if full-blown jealousy is the word, maybe more catty. Not you personally, of course.

Anonymous said...

If that's true Mila really likes fugly men :)

Anonymous said...

I don't know if full-blown jealousy is the word, maybe more catty. Not you personally, of course.

Catty? No, I've never been catty. Really not. But you can not know that of course. I have just a different opinion, that is all. All I said is I find Mila's acting and looks overrated. Instead I like other young actresses I listed. That is all.

Anonymous said...

Of course - I believe everyone should express their own opinions freely. I wasn't the original poster about Mila, I just wanted to contribute to the convo about her. The first time I ever saw her was in Black Swan - she was beautiful in it, practicing ballet with her tattoos. It was an interesting combination, the delicacy of the ballet wear and moves, but with the edgy tattoos. She was great in it, as was Natalie. :) But everyone has their own ideas of beauty and sexiness.

Anonymous said...

I don't only find Mila overrated, I feel the same about Amanda Seyfried. Who I foresee a good acting future till old are N. Portman, Michelle W., Carey Mulligan, maybe ScarJo (I liked her in Vicky, Christina, Barcelona and Match Point).

Anonymous said...

If by "cheap" you mean exotic and sexy, then yes Mila looks cheap. ;)

Anonymous said...

Michelle and Anne I will always love, since Brokeback Mountain. I love Carey too. I haven't seen ScarJo in much. Marion Cotillard is another, she broke my heart as Mal. I hope she's got a hidden side beneath the Board of Directors socialite she's going to play in TDKR! Joe too. :)

Anonymous said...

If by "cheap" you mean exotic and sexy, then yes Mila looks cheap. ;)

Oh jeez, why does it bother some that i find her to be cheap looking? So what? Most don't. It was jmo that's all. I just don't see a long future as a serious actress. I guess we'll see though. Maybe I'm wrong.

Anonymous said...

Mila's voice makes her even sexier.

Anonymous said...

Marion will always have this sensitivity about her since I saw her in La Vie en Rose. I must be the only one who got teary during Inception! lol

Anonymous said...

Marion Cotillard is another, she broke my heart as Mal

Agreed, Marion seems classy and a good actress.

Anonymous said...

Mila still looks like a teenager, I prefer women who look like adults :)

Anonymous said...

Mila's voice makes her even sexier.

April 25, 2011 8:31 AM


I get it 8:31 AM, you are a Mila fanboy/girl. I won't say anything about her anymore, so you can stop defending her and relax. ;)

Anonymous said...

Mila isn't "dating" Justin, Justin new beard is Olivia Wilde. He and Jessica were bearding for each other.

I have no idea who Mila is dating, any rumors about Justin and Mila is probably due to some crappy rom-com they have coming out this summer.

Anonymous said...

I get it 8:31 AM, you are a Mila fanboy/girl. I won't say anything about her anymore, so you can stop defending her and relax. ;)

Why are you so defensive? It's not just one person who posts here.

Anonymous said...

Michelle W was fantastic in BV. You could feel the life drained out of her by a relationship that wasn't working and had all but ended. So realistic. Of course, Ryan's Dean the guy who had a big heart but never grew up, you couldn't help but love too. Equally valid personalities, they just couldn't work together. :(

Anonymous said...

Justin and Mila backstage at Ellen DeGeneres Show


ONTD

Anonymous said...

Michelle W was fantastic in BV. You could feel the life drained out of her by a relationship that wasn't working and had all but ended. So realistic. Of course, Ryan's Dean the guy who had a big heart but never grew up, you couldn't help but love too. Equally valid personalities, they just couldn't work together. :(

They are two of the best young actors of their generation, not doubt.

Anonymous said...

Michelle W. is not a great actress. She is not terrible bad as Natalie Portman but she is just ok.
She just works in depressive movies,that's all.

Blue Valentine is not realistic or honest. Nothing exposed in the movie is new,original or controversial.
And two actors screaming at each other and whining their lines while being filmed with a hand-held camera (in indie movies there is not such thing as a tripod) does not make a valuable film.

After all this years, I also believe there are a lot of mediocrity on the making of Brokeback Mountain movie but i guess this isn't the right site to talk about that...

Anonymous said...

Are all four BBM actors mediocre in your opinion or just Heath, Michelle and Anne? ;)

Anonymous said...

She just works in depressive movies,that's all.

Her next movie with Seth Rogan is a comedy and her Marylin Monroe film will come out this year as well. If she succeeds in both (and I heard the movie with Seth is great) than you can't call her one-note anymore.

Michelle & Spike are on said...

Twitter

Anonymous said...

^^
crossing paths with Michelle Williams and Spike Jonze in my neighbordhood is a fantastic way to end the weekend!

Anonymous said...

Just when she has a new movie in theaters and starting promo for the Monroe pic soon!!! Life is so full of coincidences!!

Anonymous said...

Heath was a very versatile actor, he had great potential to have a career similar to Depp's. Anne is good, but she happens to overact often. She needs practice, but she'll be fine. Michelle is great in choosing great roles and if she succeeds in roles out of her comfort zone (like the upcoming ones) she'll have a similar career to Kate Winslet's. Jake was solid in the well fit indie roles when he was younger, it's good he tried to strech himself in various roles as of late (even though some movies weren't well received), I think he has the potential to get better and better, if he wants to. His acting reminds me of DiCaprio's nowadays.

Anonymous said...

Just when she has a new movie in theaters and starting promo for the Monroe pic soon!!! Life is so full of coincidences!!

Nah, I think she's just lonely and needs some loving again.

Anonymous said...

I read Heath had a man crush on Depp.

Anonymous said...

I read Heath had a man crush on Depp.

Well Depp is a beautiful man in and out, so no wonder. ;)

Anonymous said...

Michelle W. is not a great actress.

Michelle is a great actress and she keeps proving that.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, Johnny Depp is beautiful. Did you know a 9 year old girl wrote a fan letter to him and he went to her school dressed as Jack Sparrow to surprise her? What a great guy. :)

Anonymous said...

Yeah, Johnny Depp is beautiful. Did you know a 9 year old girl wrote a fan letter to him and he went to her school dressed as Jack Sparrow to surprise her? What a great guy. :)

Johnny Depp loves children. :)

Anonymous said...

Johnny is beautiful. When I saw him in Edward Scissorhands, I haven't been the same since. And I swooned over him as John Dillinger (with Marion). I don't blame Heath if he had a crush. Michelle I think is a wonderful actress. Anne's personality suited Lureen to a T, and Michelle was incredible as Alma. Some of those early role impressions can stay with an audience. I did see BV as painfully real - but not all relationships are like that of course. Cindy had a difficult life starting before she even met Dean, and that seemed to leave a lasting impression it seemed. And Dean was just a very open, almost innocent, kind of guy.

Anonymous said...

^^Anne as the young Lureen.

Anonymous said...

Michelle is good but not great by any means.Depp is charismaric and always succes on making a connection with the audience but he is not a very talented actor,he never was.

Anonymous said...

Michelle is good but not great by any means.

Critics disagree.

BI said...

When this famous director dropped out of a high-profile project, there was some speculation that it was due to personal rather than professional reasons. He had broken up with an actress last year, and it was believed that each was taking time off from work to battle over the custody of their child/ren. What isn’t public knowledge is that their breakup was due in large part to his affair with another actress… who became pregnant with his baby. The jury is still out on whether or not any of the three will ever acknowledge the affair and/or the baby's paternity.

My guess..
Director: Darren Aronofsky (the project being Wolverine)
First Actress: Rachel Weisz
Second Actress: Natalie Portman.

http://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/58682049.html

Anonymous said...

Ohhhhhhhhhhh noooooooooo ...

Anonymous said...

Michelle is good but not great by any means.

Critics disagree.

^^

Since when critics are the word of God?

Anonymous said...

Since forever.

Anonymous said...

"Since forever"

^^
For a brainwashed like you maybe, not for the rest of the humanity

Anonymous said...

11:16 AM - we get it, you hate Michelle.

We also know that you are informed enough to know how your opinion is insignificant compared to what professional critics, movie professionals and true art lovers have to say about performances.

Anonymous said...

Johnny Depp and Heath Ledger. Now that would have a been a slash writers dream.

Anonymous said...

Critics,journalist,movie goers,and "true art lovers"(LOL to that one) are often full of shit and everybody knows it.

Remember: those groups of people are the ones who voted Crash for best picture.

No reason to keep discussing Michelle's acting skills specifically, every actor in the world have their fans and their detractors. Acting is not like sports, being good or bad are very subjective things.

What is inadequate is to classify an actor as 100% great just because a bunch of critics and Harvey Weinstein say it.

the end.

Anonymous said...

Johnny Depp and Heath Ledger. Now that would have a been a slash writers dream.

They would probably work together if Heath were alive. With the huge success with the Joker, Heath would have his pick at roles and since he admired Johnny Depp it's a no brainer he would want to work with him. Johnny Depp obviously liked Heath too so.

Anonymous said...

Remember: those groups of people are the ones who voted Crash for best picture.

Not true, critics don't vote for Oscars.

Anonymous said...

No reason to keep discussing Michelle's acting skills specifically, every actor in the world have their fans and their detractors.

LOL!
Being a great actor has nothing to do with fans, I'm sure you know that, you are just pissed off because critics are praising Michelle's acting and you can't do anything about it.

Anonymous said...

Being a great actor has nothing to do with fans
^^
I meant actors have people between the public and between the critics who like them and some others who don't.It's all about opinions.

Why would I want to stop critics,movie goers and the Weinsten Company to make Michelle a successful actress? It's not like it will be a WWIII if that would happen. I'm just stating my own opinion just like you are doing with yours. I'm calmer about it but we are doing the same here: comparing opinions.

Anonymous said...

Cannes Wish List 2011: 40 Films We Have Reason To Hope For
...
”Take This Waltz,” directed by Sarah Polley (Canada)
Sarah Polley’s directorial follow-up to “Away From Her,” “Take This Waltz” is a romantic comedy that stars Michelle Williams as a woman torn between her loving husband (Seth Rogen) and a sexy new dude she meets during a “steamy Toronto summer” (Luke Kirby). The film finished shooting last fall and was selling at AFM. The fest is definitely a fan of Ms. Polley (she was on the jury a few years back), but “Waltz” might be a bit light for the fest. That said, the script (also written by Polley) made the Blacklist a few years back and is truly fantastic, so if it doesn’t win over critics (and buyers, as the film does not have a U.S. distributor) in Cannes, it surely will come September, where it will be a much more perfect fit for a Toronto premiere. [Peter Knegt]

http://www.indiewire.com/article/cannes_wish_list_2011_40_new_films_to_hope_for/P2/

Anonymous said...

He does it because Jake is in the closet so they hide from everyone.

this is only your insane logic which is bullshit.

it does not seem that Austin or Jake is hiding from anyone. Austin tweets all the times about his whereabouts, and Jake is seen everywhere. there are always tweets and sitings about Jake, and most seem to be true.

Anonymous said...

Why would I want to stop critics,movie goers and the Weinsten Company to make Michelle a successful actress?

You can't do anything.

I'm just stating my own opinion just like you are doing with yours.
And I'll repeat that our opinions don't matter when it comes to being a great actor, there is a way to achive objectivity and what general public thinks is irelevant.

Anonymous said...

Some of Jake's fans need to face up to the truth that the guy manipulates and he has lied because he is still deep in the closet.

What? I can't believe you said that.

Your assumptions can be considered lies also since you take all of your JIG allies and yours as the Truth.

What about the JIG fans facing up to Jake does not have to call paps when he's in the presents of a woman or by himself so the JIG fans will think he's not with Austin. They need to face up with the fact that Austin and Sophia have traveled the world together without Jake, and they still do and have for some years now. You do the math.
They need to face the fact that there have not been one (1) siting of a Jaustin baby/child. Not (1)!
It's 2011, and this child that according to Ted was suppose to be born in what (2007), where is the child.
They need to face the fact that there is no babytile, no more hanky panky between the two, and they very seldom are together.

Face those FACTS. PeeGee

Anonymous said...

Why would I want to stop critics,movie goers and the Weinsten Company to make Michelle a successful actress?
You can't do anything like that, but your personal dislike is obvious.

I'm just stating my own opinion just like you are doing with yours.
And I'll repeat that our opinions don't matter when it comes to being a great actor, there is a way to achive objectivity and what general public thinks is irelevant.

Anonymous said...

hummm there is a Michelle Williams blog isn't there?

a Aniston and Jolie blog, right?

A Mila Kunis blog?

Just saying.

Anonymous said...

They need to face the fact that there have not been one (1) siting of a Jaustin baby/child. Not (1)!

Surely a pap that's not in Jake and PR's pockets would be able to find and take a picture of the baby and paste babytiles pictures all over the tabloids and internet.

PeeGee and Co think that all LA and NY paps and agencys are into helping Jake and Austin with their little secret. That's just wierd and a bunch of bull.

Jake calls paps, ok I'm about to go to the farmers market with Busy, we'll be there at 1pm. Tomorrow I'll be with Austin in Santa Monica, so yall don't come there ok. Money will be in your account. Thanks fellas.

^^ Bullllllshit! Plain and Simple.

Anonymous said...

"there is a way to achive objectivity and what general public thinks is irelevant."

You are going with the concept that majorities's opinion and public consensus are irrefutable.
I can't help but disagree with that. We are not living in Nazi Germany,you know?

p.s. Michelle still sucks.

Anonymous said...

hummm there is a Michelle Williams blog isn't there?

a Aniston and Jolie blog, right?

A Mila Kunis blog?

Just saying.


Sometimes it's also fun discussing other celecs than Jake.

Anonymous said...

I can't help but disagree with that.

You can hate Michelle and disagree with objectivity as much as you like - it doesn't matter, her great performances don't need your approval.

Anonymous said...

Re. someone claiming good or bad acting performances are sujective. I would disagree. I noticed with good actors the majority seems to agree they are good, with bad actors the majority seems to agree they are bad. Critics are not always right and you should not let critics keep your from watching a movie, but often they are right about movies and the quality of an actor's performance(s).

Anonymous said...

^^subjective

Anonymous said...

We discuss here Jake and Six Degrees of Separation from Jake, Jake's acting peers, etc. I agree, you can't put 100% stock in critics, but they are generally correct in judging good movies and acting, and they are in Michelle's case. The majority of critics and general moviegoers seem to think so.

Anonymous said...

Ok, you want objective opinion? here it is:

MW is overrated, she does indie depressing movies that people tend to say they like because it sounds good to say so.
MW wouldn't have a chance in Europe where actors need to have extensive live theater experience and more acting abilities than puting a sore face and sad cow eyes.

objective enough for you?

Anonymous said...

1:25 I agree with you.

I could see if the Actor with the paps in his pockets were Clint Eastwood, Jack Nicolas, D. Washingotn, Tom Hanks or Will Smith, But Jake(?).

NO! Jake does not have that kind of clout "yet" in HW.

And let's not talk about Austin!

The paps / press / tabs would eat Jake alive if there was any truth to the babytile rumors. I could see them "maybe" ignoring the gay relationship, but I would think the paps and agency would .....
Noooo. not happening, it takes too much money to pay off paps and agencies. And Jake's not there yet. Austin, Not at All.

The best thing to do is, When puplic get a wiff of what's going on, stop it, end it.

That's what I think Jake and Austin did. Just friends now.

Anonymous said...

Ok, you want objective opinion

Your hate is very subjective.

Spike"the cool director" Jonze said...

objective enough for you?

You better stop insulting my Michelle or else I'll come over and...

Anonymous said...

Dislike is not hate. And i don't "hate" people who think different. I may hate their opinions but not the person.
I'm going to say goodbye now.So,what you say if he cut this subject right here and join the "Jake/Austin are they or aren't they" discussion?

so long..

Anonymous said...

Dislike is not hate.

Your "more acting abilities than puting a sore face and sad cow eyes" - I call that hate.

Anonymous said...

Now there's a "sooper sekrit" birthday party for Austin? Who knows, but lol at that phrase. Sigh, as long as J&A have been together, maybe Jake forgot A's b-day and it's no longer the national holiday it once was?

Anonymous said...

Your "more acting abilities than puting a sore face and sad cow eyes" - I call that hate.


Aaawwww... why is it making you so mad?? Is it because it's true? :(

Anonymous said...

May I suggest moving on from who we consider being good or bad actors and accept that everyone has a different opinion, ok?

Anonymous said...

What is true, 2:46 PM?

Anonymous said...

IDK what is more boring, Michelle's fangurl or Michelle's acting.

I guess the answer is "subjective"

Anonymous said...

I'm happy to see that Michelle's fantastic reviews are pissing off the haters :)

Anonymous said...

^^
lol guys, let's move on.

Anonymous said...

Now there's a "sooper sekrit" birthday party for Austin?

Birthday party was so sooper sekrit that Jake didn't know anything about it!

Anonymous said...

Mumford & Sons are performing in Austin, TX tomorrow so maybe Jake will remember the birthday and call Austin!

Jake said...

Oops!

Anonymous said...

Birthday party was so sooper sekrit that Jake didn't know anything about it!

LOL!

Anonymous said...

it totally makes sense that sometimes Austin might have to wear some props or else sit 20 rows back from Jake in order for them to do something together.

LOL. If he's sitting 20 rows back, then they're not really "doing something together."

If you honestly think Austin is sneaking around in some type of disguise and staying hidden or "20 rows back" then you must think he's the most pathetic loser on the planet. Honestly, no one with an ounce of self-respect would subject themselves to such humiliation.

Anonymous said...

Mumford & Sons are performing in Austin, TX tomorrow so maybe Jake will remember the birthday and call Austin!

LOL!

Anonymous said...

Carrying a conversation with yourself, 8:23?

Anonymous said...

it totally makes sense that sometimes Austin might have to wear some props or else sit 20 rows back from Jake in order for them to do something together


Poor, poor Austin... he is the one doing the work in this "relationship".... he has to sit 20 rows back, he has to wear the fake moustache, dark hat and glasses.

Geez Jake, will you put some effort into this and at least one time YOU sit 20 rows back??

Anonymous said...

All that and he doesn't even get a phone call on his birthday? Jake is off gallavanting.

Anonymous said...

The paps / press / tabs would eat Jake alive if there was any truth to the babytile rumors.

With J. Jaxton and Ian running their mouths to whoever would listen about Jake being gay, having a lover and surrogate baby, you just know the paps and the tabloids have dug very deep and turned every stone looking for a BabyTile.

That fool Ian was on some hollywood radio talk show spewing (gay father Jake) tales to the 3 host. So, the word is out there.
Still, no baby has turned up.
Because there is no baby.

Jake said...

Geez Jake, will you put some effort into this and at least one time YOU sit 20 rows back??

Hell, no! I'm the movie star and he's the one on that cheesy nighttime soap!

Anonymous said...

That fool Ian was on some hollywood radio talk show spewing (gay father Jake) tales to the 3 host.

When? Where?

Anonymous said...

I thought Ian during some podcast paosted on his site said that he looked into it and saod that there was no baby and Jake and Austin weren't together, this was back in 2007.

Jaxson appeared on some gossip show in FL back in 2007 talking about gay actors, this was after his first Jake is gay post and before the BT crap he posted.

So yeah the rags had plenty of time to look into it.

The NE had no problem outing John Edwards and his secret baby after they were tipped off and a mna running for President is more important than some actor that starred in Bubble boy.

Anonymous said...

I wish he would just get married to end all this drama

Anonymous said...

^ will Austin wear white?

Anonymous said...

Yes, Ian said there was no Baby Tile, Austin and Jake were never together HOWEVER, he said Jake was gay, had an affair with an older producer, was frequently seen hanging out at some gay LA burlesque club (also hit on guys there) and was in love with (or had a big crush on) Heath.

Anonymous said...

That fool Ian was on some hollywood radio talk show spewing (gay father Jake) tales to the 3 host.

When? Where?

^^ this happened back when Jaxton thought he had some real scoop to go to the tabloids with. 2007 or 2008. He talked to some radio show in LA talking about Jake and his lover and expecting a baby. The radio host acted surprised and wanted more from him, but he was silenced by lawyers. He said nothing else and began to think he was duped. He had no evidence, only hearsay like most on the Jake sites. He talked about the same shit here that's been talked about since 05.

Anonymous said...

That fool Ian was on some hollywood radio talk show spewing (gay father Jake)

^^ Sorry, my bad. It was J. Jaxson who talked to the radio station. Ian had a blog and a podcast. Two different guys who said they had some inside scoop on Jake's life.

Anonymous said...

Looks like the troll is all riled up. Cant hide behind his spelling errors. Singing the same lame old hash. Still no sale.

Anonymous said...

Is that you real M?

Anonymous said...

I wish he would just get married to end all this drama

I thought Jake is married :)

prairiegirl said...

Trolls and JIG believers who believe Jake is or never has been with Austin can laugh at Jonathan Jaxson all they want.

But here's a fact for you.


For someone who once published on his blog the stories about Jake being gay and spawning a kid with Austin, then closed that blog to say he was getting "out of the blog business", it's interesting to see what he's doing now. He's running a blog again, albeit as obscure and small as it is. It's called something like Dishin' the Dirt - go ahead, google it.

And what has he put on his blog?

He is suddenly shipping a straight Jake, and that includes a post on Jaylor. Go ahead & look - it's pretty ugly.

Anonymous said...

He is suddenly shipping a straight Jake, and that includes a post on Jaylor.

What should we conclude from that?

Anonymous said...

What should we conclude from that?

Just a guess, but I think PG is inferring that J Jaxson is now on PR's payroll, so he has changed his tune and now promotes JiS.

PR are behind everything didn't y'know!

Anonymous said...

OK, but what that has to do with anything? Perez Hilton did the same.

Anonymous said...

beerbitty: Great day! stressfree workday, yummy dinner, ACL taping w/ friends, & jake gyllenhaal dancing behind me to Mumford & sons. I'm a happy lady.
about 10 hours ago

^^ said...

Austin, TX
Mumford & Sons at the ACL taping!! Life is gooooooood.
11 hours ago

pic said...

CosmoPolitician: this 1's for @kgambetta: Jake Gyllenhaal with Macus Mumford of Mumford & Sons on the @RailroadRevival train Easter Mass http://bit.ly/hikpYW
about 10 hours ago

Anonymous said...

Going to see a live Mumford and Sons taping for the ACL tv show...for free... #bestdayever
11 hours ago

Jake Gyllenhaal was just within 3 feet of me. Trying not to hyperventilate...
11 hours ago

http://twitter.com/#!/madigans71

Austin said...

I signed for ONE more season of One Tree Hill. Now its time for all of you to tell the CW Network that you want them to pick it up for S9.
9 hours ago

Anonymous said...

OK, but what that has to do with anything?

Ask peegee

Sophia said...

Well faithful followers ... I am officially in for ONE last year of OTH. The writers have GREAT plans! Now all we need is a CW pick up! ;)
5 hours ago

So far it's me, @AUS10NICHOLS, @robbuckleyoth, @kramergirl, & #LisaGoldstein!! Keep your fingers crossed for the rest! @CW_network #OTHS9

Anonymous said...

Mumford & Sons at the ACL taping!!

See, Jake is already in Austin, TX :)

Mumford and Sons Upcoming concerts said...

Tuesday 26 April 2011
Austin, TX

Friday 29 April to Sunday 01 May New Orleans, LA

Anonymous said...

He is suddenly shipping a straight Jake, and that includes a post on Jaylor. Go ahead & look - it's pretty ugly.

Hey PeeeGee, you think Jaxson, Ian, Perez and everyone is out to discredit JIG and OMG regulars?

Ever thought that they may be telling the truth?



NO! Jake does not have that kind of clout "yet" in HW.

The paps / press / tabs would eat Jake alive if there was any truth to the babytile rumors.


^^^ I agree. If anyone could find out the truth of a baby, the tabs and press could.

But we know PeeGee has done some research and she keeps data, yeah she has the answers.

LMAO

Anonymous said...

See, Jake is already in Austin, TX

^^ Austin's birthday was Sunday, OK

Anonymous said...

OT Anyone here think the guy from Glee, M. Morrisey looks like he and Jake could be brothers?

They favor each other in some shots I've seen of him on TV.

Anonymous said...

Austin's birthday was Sunday, OK

Come on, that was only 2 days ago, next to nothing :)

Anonymous said...

OT Anyone here think the guy from Glee, M. Morrisey looks like he and Jake could be brothers?

Matthew Morrison? Nice body, fugly face.

Anonymous said...

Matthew Morrison?

Yes, Him.

Anonymous said...

... you think Jaxson, Ian, Perez and everyone is out to discredit JIG and OMG regulars?

Jaxson shoud be ignored, no need to waste tim on him.
Ian said that Jake is gay and faked a relationship with Witherspoon.
Perez in on Jake's PR pay list + he loves money too much to out anyone of importance.

Anonymous said...

No need to waste time on Ian either. His first Jake post asked everyone to refer to the Toothy Tile files for info, apparently that's how he got his initial info. He's an alleged writer do he used TT's BI's like Jonathan did and embellished.

The affair with a producer was a TT BI and the other BS about him having affait with some girl and a guy, he never followed up on. The crap about Jake/TT and the book he was trying to push never happened, there is no evidence that he and his team approached publishers.

He had no inside info on Jake faking it with Reese because that was obvious, and him hitting on guys at gay clubs is easy to make up especially if you don't name the clubs plus if true, there would be gossip all over gay blogs if he did that.

The only thing he actually followed up on was the fake BT and Austin. After that I think he dropped the whole thing, yes he said he is gay but everything else was BS. He dropped it because he didn't want to turn out like Jaxson , looking like a jackass.

The thing is Ian is a jackass and a tool, once he figured out that the source was Ted's TT' BI's he dropped it even though he supposedly aquainted with him and tried to push Ted's other BI's at some point, LOL

Anonymous said...

Well said 10:24. Well said

Anonymous said...

Ian is dumber than dirt. My fav was when he was so proud of outing Jake as TT in 2/2009, meanwhile gossip sites like Gawker already figured out it was Jake back in the summer of 2005, talk about sloppy research! And also TT's/Jake Aunt talked to Ian, LOL!!! I guees it helps to be a "writer". I think he did 10 posts on it in 2/2009-3/2009 thinking he was going to get massive hits and attention, when the baloon went out of his sail, he dropped it.

Anonymous said...

10:24 - watch out, as you make sense, peegee will accuse you of being a PR plant :)

Anonymous said...

At least Ian debunked the Austin/Jake /Baby Tile nonsense.

Anonymous said...

Austin said...
I signed for ONE more season of One Tree Hill.


Another confirmation that there is no J&A or BT.

Anonymous said...

Jake has been spotted with David Modigliani. Pic

David is from ATX, so the jaustaloons pretend he doesn't exist. They think that the only reason why Jake would go to ATX is because Austin is from there, and the fake BTz get looked after by Austin's parents.

Anonymous said...

12:00 PM - please stop lying.

No one ever petended that David Modigliani doesn't exist.
David was seen with Jake ONCE (1 time) in 2006 + we know that Jake visited David in 2009(?).
Two times.
So it is reasonable to presume that Jake would visit Austin, TX because of someone he knows for a long time and used to hang out a lot (Austin N).

Anonymous said...

No one ever petended that David Modigliani doesn't exist.

Not true. OMG doesn't believe he exists.

Anonymous said...

LOL! Who's lying? You have no idea who Jake visits in ATX. It may be both AN & DM. I don't discount that Jake visited either or both of them, I also don't completely ignore DM because it doesn't fit with Jaustin fantasy.

Anonymous said...

12:11 PM - please READ posts: it is reasonable to presume.

Anonymous said...

Jake took David Modigliani to London to the Baftas, this year at SXSW to the premiere of SC, went to TX to celebrate his birthday a couple years ago. When is the last time Jake did that with Austin? I'm not talking Jaustin fanfic, I'm talking real proof.

Anonymous said...

please READ posts

I HAVE READ posts on OMG that stated Jake was in ATX to see AN, when clearly he was there for David's birthday. So please don't call me a liar.

Anonymous said...

Jake was seen with Austin more times than with David. That is all we know for sure.

Anonymous said...

^^David Modigliani isn't recognizable like Austin and Austin lives in LA, same as Jake. David lives in ATX. So saying we know Jake was seen with Austin (I assume you mean papped) more often isn't really saying much.

Anonymous said...

12:27 PM - this is a lie: "the jaustaloons pretend he doesn't exist", keep in mind that other people read OMG too.

"Clearly he was there for David's birthday" - that is YOUR opinion, Jake could have visited more that one person.

Anonymous said...

So saying we know Jake was seen with Austin (I assume you mean papped) more often isn't really saying much.

It means that as far as we KNOW, Jake and Austin are/were closer friends than Jake and David.
P.S. I'm sure you wouldn't have a problem with such conclusion if we were talking about other Jake's friends.

Anonymous said...

^^Wrong.

Anonymous said...

What is wrong?

Anonymous said...

It means that as far as we KNOW, Jake and Austin are/were closer friends than Jake and David.

BS. Then why did he take David and not Austin to the BAFTA's??? HMMMMMMMM

Oh that's right, Austin was sitting in Row 20 with his Ronald McDonald wig on trying to blend in!

Anonymous said...

Then why did he take David and not Austin to the BAFTA's???

I was right, I knew you are trying to sell "if we are discussing Austin than Jake is closer to every other friend of his" bullshit.

Anonymous said...

What is wrong?

You are wrong. I have no problem with Jake and Austin's friendship but sorry, I don't think they're a couple.

We also know Jake, David and Chris have been friends since childhood. Just because they're not papped together it doesn't mean they aren't close. Obviously David is important enough to Jake to accompany him to official events and for Jake to go to ATX for his birthday.

Anonymous said...

Sorry dear, no need to sell the facts.

Anonymous said...

I have no problem with Jake and Austin's friendship but sorry, I don't think they're a couple.

Who said or implied that Jake and Austin are a couple? Quote please!

Anonymous said...

Obviously David is important enough to Jake to accompany him to official events and for Jake to go to ATX for his birthday.

^Exactly. And that is why Jaustinites are threatened by David, and always spin things to make him look less important.

Anonymous said...

Sorry dear, no need to sell the facts.

Your spinning doesn't work.

Anonymous said...

Who said or implied that Jake and Austin are a couple? Quote please!

You are implying it with "I'm sure you wouldn't have a problem with such conclusion if we were talking about other Jake's friends." Why would you think I have a problem with Jake and Austin's friendship unless you thought it's because I have a problem with them being a couple?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Obviously David is important enough to Jake to accompany him to official events

I really hate when you play stupid like that, insulting people's intelligence won't help your "argument".

You know why Jake didn't take Austin to BAFTA-s:

04/11/2006
Statement from Jake's rep:
"Gay fans of Jake Gyllenhaal are determined to claim the "Brokeback Mountain" star as their own. Blogosphere gossips have been claiming that Gyllenhaal was ready to admit he was having trouble quitting actor Austin Nichols, whom he has known since high school. But sorry, guys, there won't be any coming-out party. Even though Jake is now split with Kirsten Dunst and Nichols broke off his engagement to Claire Oswalt, Gyllenhaal's rep says he and Nichols are just friends."

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

12:58 PM - what's next, you will claim that pictures of Jake and Austin hanging out don't exist?

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

You know why Jake didn't take Austin to BAFTA-s

No, I don't and you don't either.

Sorry but you are the one playing stupid and spinning. You're assuming if it weren't for that Jake would have taken Austin to the Baftas or other official events instead of David. You're turning it into a fact but in reality it's only your speculation.

Anonymous said...

what's next, you will claim that pictures of Jake and Austin hanging out don't exist?

^No-one has said anything about Jake and Austin. We are discussing Jake and David. You are the one who keeps bringing Austin into it. Obviously that threatens you. Sad.

Anonymous said...

1:05 PM - you know that taking Austin to BAFTAS during that time was not an option for Jake.

Why are you so desperate to make David look like Jake's BFF? That can't change Jake and Austin story, you must know that.

Anonymous said...

We are discussing Jake and David. You are the one who keeps bringing Austin into it.

Liar, read posts:

Jake took David Modigliani to London to the Baftas, this year at SXSW to the premiere of SC, went to TX to celebrate his birthday a couple years ago. When is the last time Jake did that with Austin? I'm not talking Jaustin fanfic, I'm talking real proof.

Anonymous said...

Why are you so desperate to make David look like Jake's BFF? That can't change Jake and Austin story, you must know that.

LOL, you're the one to talk. Why are you so desperate to make it look like David isn't close with Jake?

You keep bringing Austin up, not me. You're the one who has a problem with me saying David is important enough for Jake to take him to events. Sorry but that's the way it is, you either deal with it or don't. That's my final word about this.

Anonymous said...

Still embellishing I see. It took you long enough to delete that post. Did you have to run off and look up what that word means? lol. I'm sure you know this word: PATHETIC

Anonymous said...

Who said or implied that Jake and Austin are a couple? Quote please!

You are implying it with "I'm sure you wouldn't have a problem with such conclusion if we were talking about other Jake's friends." Why would you think I have a problem with Jake and Austin's friendship unless you thought it's because I have a problem with them being a couple?


Wrong. I think you have a problem with Jake and Austin's friendship because you are so desperate to make David look more important and make Austin less important in Jake's life that you are saying things like "so saying we know Jake was seen with Austin (I assume you mean papped) more often isn't really saying much", implaying that simple logic works for other friends but not for Austin.

Jake's home video said...

BT and Atticus fighting over food

Anonymous said...

I wonder how old the poster who keeps throwing "liar" around is. ;) Not very mature.

Anonymous said...

Who cares about Austin. We know what Jake has said about David

He also talked about him and his bud's publicity circuit after Brokeback: "Me and my best friend have known each other since we were 6 and I took him to a lot of award ceremonies when Brokeback Mountain was doing the awards circuit," he said.

http://gaylife.about.com/b/2011/03/25/jake-gyllenhaal-talks-about-the-gay-rumors-on-jimmy-kimmel-live.htm

Anonymous said...

1:33 PM - what would be a better word for a person who posts false info?

«Oldest ‹Older   1201 – 1400 of 2704   Newer› Newest»