Sunday, 29 November 2009

Fauxmance is Over!

November 29, 2009

Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal have split, a source close to the actress tells PEOPLE. No further details were given.

Source: People magazine, Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal Split

Jake Gyllenhaal, Reese Witherspoon, fauxmance

1,565 comments:

  1. Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal Split

    Sunday November 29, 2009 02:45 PM EST

    Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal have split, a source close to the actress tells PEOPLE.

    No further details were given.

    Witherspoon, 33, and Gyllenhaal, 28, costarred in the 2007 movie Rendition, after which rumors started flying about them as an off-screen couple.

    By the summer of 2008, however, the rumors appeared to be confirmed, thanks, in part, to an extended Bastille Day holiday in Paris – followed, the next month, when they were seen in Marrakech, spending a Saturday strolling hand-in-hand, checking out bazaar stalls, before stepping into the shade for lunch, according to reports.

    Come that Sunday, the couple reportedly stayed in their suites at the 5-star Amanjena Hotel, described as a beautiful, romantic getaway boasting a view of the Atlas Mountains.

    'Very Supportive'
    By that fall, Witherspoon was telling Vogue about Gyllenhall: "He's very supportive. Suffice it to say, I'm very happy in life, and I'm very lucky to have a lot of really supportive people around me who care very much for me, and, you know, that's all you can hope for in life. I am very blessed in that way."

    This spring, in April, the two enjoyed a steamy escape to the Southern California desert, where they looked cozy together at the Coachella Valley Music & Arts Festival. "Reese looked cute in a hat and bikini," an eyewitness told PEOPLE. "She was in a great mood and kept chatting with Jake between sips of a piƱa colada."

    And as recently as last month, things still appeared to be running smoothly between the two, with Witherspoon telling InStyle, "We spend the weekends outside L.A, in Ojai, where I have a farmhouse. We have chickens and we grow cucumbers and tomatoes. I love it. It reminds me of where I grew up in Tennessee."

    Oscar Recognition
    Witherspoon, the 2006 Oscar winner as Best Actress for her role as June Carter Cash in the Johnny Cash biopic Walk the Line, was married for seven years to her Cruel Intentions costar Ryan Phillippe, until their 2006 divorce. They have two children, Ava, 10, and Deacon, 6.

    Gyllenhaal's high-profile roles included those in Brokeback Mountain, which earned him a 2006 Oscar nomination.

    Last year, Witherspoon costarred with Vince Vaughn in the holidays Four Christmases, about a couple who all but split due to pressures brought on by their respective families.

    http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20323257,00.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. I knew from the start "Gyllenspoon", real or fake, would drag him down and overshadow his career. I think he finally realized it too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tee hee hee (evil sneer).

    Let's hear it for schadenfreude.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Told cha she's a bitch and you wouldn't listen.

    ReplyDelete
  5. OMG, such wonderful Jakey news! :)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Beautiful news!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I bet babblers are happy, too!

    ReplyDelete
  8. split sadly not true :(November 29, 2009 4:45 pm

    marcmalkin: Jake's rep just told me not true. Jake and reese are still together!

    http://twitter.com/marcmalkin/status/6180442625

    Story that Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal have split up is 'false.'

    A spokeswoman for Reese Witherspoon has told EW that a story which broke earlier today about the star having split with Jake Gyllenhaal is “false.” The two actors first started dating after they were both cast in the 2007 film Rendition.

    http://news-briefs.ew.com/2009/11/29/story-that-reese-witherspoon-and-jake-gyllenhaal-have-split-up-is-false/

    ReplyDelete
  9. ^^So, they are still together?

    Was it a publicity stunt to sell Brothers? Jeez!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Well, it was too good to be true. :(

    ReplyDelete
  11. Damn. Yet another low for them. I couldn't hate them more.

    ReplyDelete
  12. But why would People magazine post fake info???

    ReplyDelete
  13. Well if they didn't break up, maybe their PR will advise them to when they read the comments on JJ and ONTD. The majority of the comments are saying good thing the bearding is over.

    ReplyDelete
  14. "Damn. Yet another low for them."

    Yup!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Another low? People mag you mean?

    ReplyDelete
  16. I think the person meant Reeke and People mag.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Damn, a whole new post for nothing. How very awkward now.

    ReplyDelete
  18. How very awkward for People magazine.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Man that's some indirect Brothers promo. LOL.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Because People is a PR rag and they posted it online on a weekend with their reps blessing.

    Brothers premiere/Avon news conference in the UK. What scum.

    ReplyDelete
  21. It's the first time Jake's reps officially acknowledge Reeke.

    ReplyDelete
  22. People said "a source close to the actress tells PEOPLE".

    Reese did it again, got publicity without even trying.

    ReplyDelete
  23. P.S. Too good to be true?

    Yes.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Brothers premiere/Avon news conference in the UK.

    Ding, ding, ding! ;)

    ReplyDelete
  25. Our Jake is truly a fake.

    Still can't quit him....

    ReplyDelete
  26. The Break Up ProcessNovember 29, 2009 5:09 pm

    Isn't it how these things usually work? There has to be trouble in paradise for this even to become a rumour, unfounded or not.

    1) throw it out there that they have broken up

    2) DENY DENY DENY

    3)Lovely Dovey Photo Op! "Why yes! I do have a movie coming out! You like the way I smell? Funny you should ask, it's my very own fragrance!"

    4) Not seen together for awhile... THEN the official announcement comes. "Yes we are no longer together but we remain the best of friends"

    Something IS brewing!

    ReplyDelete
  27. The news probably got out before Reese, the control freak, wanted it out. I think they're finished.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Now I need two drinks! lol

    ReplyDelete
  29. How com Mailkin from E is Quoting Jake's rep and not Reese's?

    If she didn't want it ouy yet, he didn't either.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Malkin is quoting Reese's rep, not Jake's. IA something is up. People usually only post PR approved stories about celebs.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Maybe Reeke approved it to sell movie and what not?

    ReplyDelete
  32. In my country it's often that celeb couples annouce they split when they have to promote something, shortly after they say they're still an item.

    ReplyDelete
  33. ^^Just to bring more attention to them.

    ReplyDelete
  34. 5:17: He is quoting Jake's rep.:

    marcmalkin :Jake's rep just told me not true. Jake and reese are still together!
    about 1 hour ago from txt

    It was PR approved because a movie is coming out. Then they deny it, same old HW BS.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Rep: Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal "Have Not Split"

    Contrary to reports elsewhere Sunday, Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal have not broken up. A rep for Witherspoon, 33, tells Usmagazine.com: "It's not true. They have not split."

    http://www.usmagazine.com/celebritynews/news/jake--reese-20092911

    ReplyDelete
  36. 3 years of Reeke and a million photo ops and in all that time the most comments they ever got on either JJ or ONTD is the post about them breaking up. How can their PR team still think that Reeke is working?

    ReplyDelete
  37. LOL that's too funny. Most of the internet comments approve of the split whether they think it's real or fake. They are just so unlikeable together.

    We'll sure get some lovey dovey Reeke pics next week. For sure. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  38. I remember when Neil Patrick Harris's rep said NPH was "not of that persuasion" when reports first came out he was gay. I'm sorry People magazine is the most respected of the celeb weeklies (if they are). Something is up. I think the news got out before Reese, the control freak, was prepared. Or she wants to manipulate Jake or she just wants publicity. Did they share Thanksgiving together? Where is she? Where is he?

    ReplyDelete
  39. Yesterday Jake was in NYC.

    ReplyDelete
  40. 5:35 PM, please, it was a Reeke PR stunt. C'est tout!

    ReplyDelete
  41. ... a source close to the actress tells PEOPLE

    It this is a PR stunt, then this is REESE's PR stunt, Jake doesn't look forward to Reeke questions.

    ReplyDelete
  42. People blurbs do not get printed without PR approval. Manipulation, thy name is Reese. This was a test to see how people would react. The jumping for joy nearly caused an earthquake in CA. Her last few mentions on Jared were in the throw away section. This was just a desperate attempt at publicity.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Publicity stunt!

    ReplyDelete
  44. That picture on Just Jared is probably meant to convey the split, but what is hilarious is that it is so typical of every picture of them. Bored, disinterested, no chemistry.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Reps: Jake and Reese Are Still Together

    Despite reports, Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal are still very much a couple, according to their reps.

    Although a source close to the couple says their relationship has ended, reps for both say, "it is not true." Nanci Ryder and Carrie Byalick, who rep Witherspoon and Gyllenhaal respectively, tell PEOPLE, "They are still together."
    Developing story ...

    http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20323262,00.html

    ReplyDelete
  46. Now it is "a source close to the couple", and it was "a source close to the actress".

    ReplyDelete
  47. Posted on OMG by Special K

    Reese pulled stuff like this even after she was broken from Ryan when he was getting good reviews for Stop Loss. She kicked stuff up when Abby got good press for Bright Star. It is always the within days of an opening.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Either this is a publicity stunt or they didn't want this out before the U.S. premiere of Brothers and her Avon conference in the U.K. (which from a PR standpoint is understandable).

    I think they're finished but don't want to go official until some time has passed.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Sorry folks! We had our dates mixed up! The contract ends December 30th not November 30th! We've told People to save the article and re-print it this time next month. (when all of us will be in the midst of our Christmas holidays and Reese can sweep it under the rug)

    ReplyDelete
  50. "Although a source close to the couple says their relationship has ended, reps for both say, "it is not true." "

    Sounds like People is sticking to their story. Reese must be pissed that she can't pull a quick Reeke photo op being that she has to be in London. Someone at CAA must have pissed off someone at People and this is their payback.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Reese And Jakey Didn't Renew Their Contract (UPDATE: Reese's Rep Denies This Shit)

    Blind Items will EXPLODE over this shit. Ted Casablanca passed the hell out. Some source tells People that Jakey G and Reese Witherspoon have said "so long, farewell" to each other after 2 years. No, seriously. Jakey totally performed "So Long, Farewell" from The Sound of Music for Reese. Jakey did it in costume and everything. He's serious about his goodbyes.

    The source didn't give any details on why they split up.

    Jakey just decided that his beard was getting too itchy and it was time to shave it all off. And Reese got bored with listening to Jakey and his "friend" rough house in the next room while she knitted a little bag for his favorite pair of anal beads.

    And the line to be Jakey's next beard forms to the left. That wasn't meant for you, Squinty Zellweger. You've got your own!

    UPDATE: Reese's spokesbitch says this shit ain't true. Her rep told UsWeekly, "It's not true. They have not split." Hmm. Reese must still be trying to renegotiate with Jakey. Reese, give Jakey weekends off and throw in a monthly anal bleaching and he will sign on the dotted line. Guaranteed!

    Dlisted

    ReplyDelete
  52. Gee, Reeke continues to bring him down. :(

    ReplyDelete
  53. Gee, Reeke continues to bring him down...

    ... and I don't feel sorry for Jake.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Wait a minute, is this the first time their reps actually say/ confirm they're "together"? Did it happen before?

    ReplyDelete
  55. They reps denied engagement rumors before so they indirectly confirmed the "relationship" before, too.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Well if they didn't break up, maybe their PR will advise them to when they read the comments on JJ and ONTD. The majority of the comments are saying good thing the bearding is over.

    You have some crazy blinders on if you think "the majority" is saying that. Of the 300+ that I've seen, 80% of them are either "Aww, I hope they haven't split up", "Yay now Reese can get back with Ryan/Joaquin" or "I never got a gay vibes from Jake". I was quite surprised at that.

    ReplyDelete
  57. "Yay now Reese can get back with Ryan/Joaquin"

    LMAO! Some fangirls are retarded.

    ReplyDelete
  58. For important stuff, did Jake get a new movie?

    As for the split, maybe Jake told someone who was going to break it off and hasn't told Reese yet.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Posted on OMG by Special K

    It isn't about overshadowing it is about taking the spotlight away from others. And if I remember she she had the cover and the spread in In Style about her amazing life when Bright Star opened in London. And all the press coverage picking up those quotes.

    And hmm how does getting the cover of national celebrity tab like US Weekly take away from her ex' opening, well putting her faux relationship on the cover gave her the sympathy of her "rebuilding" and refinding love, especially when her ex and his girlfriend were both in Stop Loss. Poor Poor Reese, the dumped divorcee, the struggling single mom. Bullshit.

    She made Ryan stay together for the press (even when they were living apart) until after the award season and she got her Oscar for Walk the Line. Why the hell do you think Ryan was so sauced with Shirley MaClain, just to get it over with. When did she have the huge blow out - DURING HIS premiere party at Flags of our Fathers. Couldn't let him get the accolades that night could she. After he put up and played nice for her. But it doesn't work the other way round.

    Reese can't let anyone else get more than her. From stories in her past like she's been like that all her life and doubt it will ever change.

    ReplyDelete
  60. For important stuff, did Jake get a new movie?

    What do you mean?

    ReplyDelete
  61. The original People story claimed that it was someone close to Reese not Jake.

    Interesting that the first official denial came from Jake's rep. via M. Mailkin/E, then a bit later it was Rese's rep via EW and Us, then we have actual quotes from both reps via People.

    I knew it was BS. The People story said it was a friend/scource close to Reese, no explanation and nothing about them trying to contact their reps. People is a PR magazine, they must have them on speed dial and yet they didn't bother.

    And twt E, US and EW had no problem contacting them.

    Either it was all BS/PR and People are in on it or some sloppy intern jumped the gun on info e-mailed to them from some fangirl with too much time on their hands,

    ReplyDelete
  62. People:

    Although a source close to the couple says their relationship has ended ...
    Developing story ...

    ReplyDelete
  63. 6:32 PM, I disagree. I read the whole thing and the comments are pretty mixed, most don't seem to give a fuck.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Stephen Silverman was one of the reporters who broke the original story. He's not an intern. He's a veteran entertainment reporter. I think the news came out before either Jake or Reese wanted to make it official. It jumped the gun.

    ReplyDelete
  65. So people is a PR magazine but they pushed this story without PR approval?

    ReplyDelete
  66. People:

    Although a source close to the couple says their relationship has ended ...
    Developing story ...


    People seems to be standing by their story.

    ReplyDelete
  67. The unnamed source? Ava Phillipe... she's pissed at her Mom because she won't allow her to see "New Moon" with her friends

    ReplyDelete
  68. "People seems to be standing by their story."

    They want to keep their credibility. We aren't supposed to know people is PR voice

    ReplyDelete
  69. "http://www.gossipcentral.com/"

    report about brothers

    ReplyDelete
  70. It was PR approved because a movie is coming out. Then they deny it, same old HW BS.

    To me that's very obviously the case.

    ReplyDelete
  71. sounds like they are just looking to drum up some interest. Sounds like they just want to be in the
    media for "Brothers" release.

    Reese knows, nothing helps a academy award nomination more than breakup rumors.

    ReplyDelete
  72. We aren't supposed to know people is PR voice

    EVERYONE knows People is PR voice.

    ReplyDelete
  73. If true, the break up would be out of left field. They were fine when she was in philly what late summer. If Jake can go months filming POP in anoher country and not jump Jemma's bones , what does it say for their relattionship that Anne can attract Jake in a couple of months when Reese in 3 hours ways and up until last month a train rain away.

    The Anne-Jake story and this break up rumor, something ain't right. If the break up pans out as true, is she going to blame Anne? It seems some ground work is being laid out here.

    ReplyDelete
  74. If the break up pans out as true, is she going to blame Anne?

    Never, the last thing Reese wants is to look like a loser.

    ReplyDelete
  75. http://www.gossipcentral.com/ report about brothers

    Strange and very, very optimistic report about Brothers.

    ReplyDelete
  76. What a fun Sunday!November 29, 2009 7:40 pm

    Jake drops Reese for Anne? (YES PLEASE!) Oh Reese won't have that! She'll spin this break up (and this little bit of excitement today means the end of this farce is near!) to benefit her!

    Jake and Anne watch your pretty backs! lol!

    ReplyDelete
  77. Yes, but he was already friends with Anne but what do he and Anne have in common? BBM! That was a magical period for Jake and a reminder of you know who. I bet he had no bond with Gemma whatsoever. It makes sense he would hae a bond with Anne.

    ReplyDelete
  78. IDK, I like Anne. She seems a good hearted person and I think she's not an "easy to get woman". I respect her. She's a good catch. But look at Jake's trade record...Kiki, Reese. Tiny blonde bitches who make him look pussy whipped, Reese more so than Kiki. He's a masochist.

    ReplyDelete
  79. I noticed babblers don't seem to like Anne that much. I feel they'd prefer Nat to hook up with Jake if Reeke ends. Interesting. They ain't too fond of Heath, of Anne... Interesting pattern. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  80. If Jake ever starts dating/"dating" Anne, you can expect the general opinion of her on WFT2 to go from "she's great/cool/ok" to "oh my god what a fucking bitch she is" in about three days. Tops.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Bullshit.

    Reese Witherspoon was dull, fake bitch before the fauxmance.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Don't worry, Jake/Anne won't happen anytime soon. Reeke is here to stay, unfortunately.

    ReplyDelete
  83. 7:57, I disagree. She's a BBM gal and most of us are BBM'ers.

    ReplyDelete
  84. Jake and Anne are like milk and water!

    ReplyDelete
  85. "she's not an "easy to get woman". "

    Of course, she's a scorpio woman, any man will have to work for it. Scorpio women love to flirt and irk other women. The pursuit of the "hands off man" is irresitable especially if he thinks he's doing the chasing. I love Anne but a romp in bed with Jake may be all she is looking for.

    ReplyDelete
  86. So is WFT2 cheering for Jake/Anne now? Just so I know. Last time I checked the general consensus here was that Jake is gay. I like Anne but sorry I don't care for another bearding arrangement.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Anne knows Jake is gay.

    ReplyDelete
  88. If Stephen Silverman is a seasoned veteran reporter, why didn't he bother contacting their reps like the other outlets dis? What was the rush to publish the "story" w/o that plus give an actual explanation. It would seem that he took a risk with his employment with Peopel by posting that w/o checking it out.

    I think he saw the story about Anne and Jake and realized that there were no reason phoro ops and made it up.

    He got a lot of hits so that may save his job, but how ad it looks when E, ET, EW, Access HW and US all contacted them and denied it.

    Maybe he has the inside from someone inside Reese's camp, but why would they run to People and not let it play out and done right.

    There is no developing story and Anne ain't risking her relationship with her BF dor this BS.

    It was PR approved and Mr. Silverman was in on it, that's the only explanation

    ReplyDelete
  89. I think he saw the story about Anne and Jake and realized that there were no reason phoro ops and made it up.

    That doesn't make any sense.

    ReplyDelete
  90. If Anne starts bearding with Jake I'll lose all the respect I have for her.

    ReplyDelete
  91. If Anne starts bearding for Jake I'll lose all the respect I have for her.

    ReplyDelete
  92. It was PR approved and Mr. Silverman was in on it, that's the only explanation."

    I doubt that very much. (He was my adjunct professor in journalism school).

    ReplyDelete
  93. 8:01, I still don't know what that means.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Jake & Reese use Reeke for promotion of themselves and their projects. It has always been like that. Today's break up rumor = promotion for upcoming film.

    ReplyDelete
  95. I think that Jake wouldn't use something like this to promote his movie.

    ReplyDelete
  96. I think Reese set this up to take some of Jake's thunder.

    Anne is as sweet and wonderful as Reese is. She screwed over people when it helped her. She was no innocent when she was trying to get awards. Please remember money stealing boyfriend. She didn't dump him so fast. She is no saint. Gay friendly, yes. Perfect, no.

    ReplyDelete
  97. Reese is a bitch, Anne is a normal person.

    ReplyDelete
  98. "So is WFT2 cheering for Jake/Anne now? Just so I know. Last time I checked the general consensus here was that Jake is gay. I like Anne but sorry I don't care for another bearding arrangement."

    I don't care who Jake is loving, Anne, Natalie, Toby, man, woman, dog, alien or a hairbrush. Just as long as its not Reese W, America's sweetheart with a heart of nails who would sell her soul to the devil if he would take, to stay relevant. Jake is just her latest, "look at me" how great I am trophy. The woman will be the downfall of any man that stays with her. She ruined Ryan's career because she couldn't share the limelight and she oould do the same to Jake.

    ReplyDelete
  99. "I think that Jake wouldn't use something like this to promote his movie."

    But they did something similar for Rendition, didn't they?

    ReplyDelete
  100. 8:24 Maybe you should ask your former "Professor" why he didn't contact their reps. and why he changed his "source" from a close source to Reese to a close source to the couple. Which one is it?

    He has no integrity becasue he "writes" for people, the biggest PR whore magazine out there.

    The story was a PR plant plain and simple.

    ReplyDelete
  101. I don't see anything similar to Rendition reeking.

    ReplyDelete
  102. Hey, if possible, could someone tell me something? We are getting singlehandedly but heavily trolled over next door and this person is doubting the Ledgerection picture; (so they say). They also alleged no knowledge of the Matt red-headed guy lunch er-one armed salute picture.

    I'm trying to find the Ledgerection pic in IHJ and if someone could just tell me if they recall which awards that was. I thought it was at the BAFTA's but I didn't see it there.

    I'll find the pic but if someone recalls which awards that was, that would help me.

    This person is a real winner. The troll, I mean.

    ReplyDelete
  103. The story was a PR plant plain and simple.

    Who's PR plant? With what purpose?

    ReplyDelete
  104. Prairie girl, the Ledgerection happened at the DGA's 2006.

    Here it is: J/H

    ReplyDelete
  105. At the Toronto film festival and just prior there were all sorts of break up stories about how Reese didn't have the emotional space for a relationship and they were on a break.

    I think it was supposed to sadden the fangirls and amp up the jubilant response to the Rome Reeke-fest.

    This whole thing is fake and PR driven. How anyone can be a fan of either of these two shameless fame whores is beyond me.

    ReplyDelete
  106. ^^Posting twins.

    What a nice pic though...;)

    ReplyDelete
  107. "We are getting singlehandedly but heavily trolled over next door and this person is doubting the Ledgerection picture; (so they say). "

    Is that Reese or Jake lurking?

    ReplyDelete
  108. They also alleged no knowledge of the Matt red-headed guy lunch er-one armed salute picture.

    Matt? Not Mike White? Or David O'Russell?

    ReplyDelete
  109. At the Toronto film festival and just prior there were all sorts of break up stories about how Reese didn't have the emotional space for a relationship and they were on a break.

    I think those stories were posted months before Toronto.
    Anyway, Reeke were playing "are they dating or not?" PR games, which is very different from today.

    ReplyDelete
  110. Oh!! I guess it's Mike White - yeah, that's his name. I'm sorry, I'm such a duncehead. I just remembered he was a redhead and I knew he was in one of Jake's movies - The Good Girl, was it?

    My memory is not good on details but I sure as heck remembered the one armed salute.

    This person is scoffing at that one - you should see their crap.

    Thank you all for your help - I've been looking through all these award shows in 2006 and admiring cute Jakey back then. What a hottie he was in his tux. At least it's been an enjoyable search.

    ReplyDelete
  111. LOLL, boy that link came quick. Okay, so who has that as their desktop??? Hmmmm????

    lol.

    Thanks again!!!

    ReplyDelete
  112. Jake looks beautiful when he's aroused.

    ReplyDelete
  113. Hey Prairie, next time you want to shit talk someone, have the guts to do it to their face instead of playing holier-than-thou on OMG and then bitching about them on WFT2. What a two faced piece of work you are.

    ReplyDelete
  114. Look at the eyes. Look at the hands. Jake wants to grab Heath more than anything in the world. Jake had strong feelings both physically and emotionally for Heath.

    ReplyDelete
  115. 9:12 PM

    Trolling on OMG is not enough for you? lol

    ReplyDelete
  116. 9:16 PM, I agree: eyes, hands, mouth and penis.

    ReplyDelete
  117. Don't worry - I said it to their face over next door since they asked.

    I'll leave you all alone - you certainly don't need their nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  118. I still think Jake's feelings for Heath went beyond a crush, and I still think Heath's death messed him up in alot of ways. And when you are a mess, it makes it that much easier for people to take control of you. I am not excusing the bearding, but it does seem that the public appearances really began to ramp up with Heath's death (almost like Jake just gave up and really let other take total control).

    Just a thought.

    ReplyDelete
  119. Don't worry - I said it to their face over next door since they asked.

    I'll leave you all alone - you certainly don't need their nonsense.



    Yes, Praire, you can stop bad mouthing me on here now that you've been caught being a two faced troll. Lets keep this on OMG.

    ReplyDelete
  120. Some posters think Jake didn’t give a sh*t about Heath’s death. I don’t think that’s true in spite of the things supporting this idea (the photo ops, Jake’s silence....).

    I tend to agree with you, 9:39 PM. I also think he wasn’t allowed to grieve properly by the General. Bottling all that up isn’t healthy at all. JMO

    ReplyDelete
  121. 9:54 PM

    Get lost to GB.

    ReplyDelete
  122. ... you've been caught being a two faced troll.

    LOL, babblers are batshit crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  123. Heath kiss (gif animation)

    Awwww :)

    ReplyDelete
  124. I have always thought that Jake putting up that picuture of Heath, as Ennis Del Mar, on the prison wall was very telling. I think Heath was Jake's ideal male.

    I have to admit I've always wondered if this lust/crush/love? for Heath ever became an issue between Jake and Austin?

    ReplyDelete
  125. "I have always thought that Jake putting up that picuture of Heath, as Ennis Del Mar, on the prison wall was very telling. I think Heath was Jake's ideal male"

    Or maybe it was a tribute or simply an ironic joke, I mean he couldn't used Jack Twist.

    ReplyDelete
  126. I know this is a tangent but I cannot make sense of this unfolding Tiger Woods story. It's one big HUH to me.

    ReplyDelete
  127. Or maybe it was a tribute or simply an ironic joke"--it was a joke--something meant to lighten the mood while shooting a very dramatic film.

    ReplyDelete
  128. No way it was Jake that leaked the news early. He would not jeopardize his movie for this. He would have waited till after it opened to make the announcement. Reese got wind of his dumping her and set the derail him plan in motion, not that I really think the film will do that well in the box office. It may get some critical praise, but its a downer film. Its only hope for decent box office is no big contenders to compete with.

    ReplyDelete
  129. Heath was sex on a stick. He had a masculinity, a grace that was magnificent. He oozed sex appeal and he was not afraid to flirt with gay guys. How could a guy like Jake resist that. He almost fell off a park bench looking at that guy in the french park. How could he not get an erection looking at Heath.

    ReplyDelete
  130. "He almost fell off a park bench looking at that guy in the french park."

    Direct me to the pic please.

    ReplyDelete
  131. Jake could have just posted a picture of a women on that prison wall like everybody else, a type of picture that would elicit a laugh. He didn't.

    Sometimes your subconscious tells the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  132. Jake had it bad for Heath, and he wasn't very good at hiding it.

    ReplyDelete
  133. he forgot him quickly I guess !!

    ReplyDelete
  134. He hasn't forgotten Heath at all. It's a problem, actually. Trust.

    ReplyDelete
  135. (Jake's 3rd-last email to Heath.)

    Subject: Let Us Freak

    Boy, please allow me to break it down for you.

    You are the love of my life, and I would travel to the ends of the earth to prove my love for you. I would fly to Europe in order to personally select the finest champagne for you to drink. I would climb to the peak of the highest mountain to demonstrate that my lower-back muscles are powerful and won't give out. I would weave for you the most comfortable silk sheets ever known to creation.

    I am the man for you, and I will make you want to get down and get funk-ass nasty with me. I will make you scream and shout all hours of the night. I will make sweet love to you like no man has ever before.

    In addition to all of that, I will wash you.

    Every time I see you, you will be presented with a lovely gift. I will give you golden cockrings that shine like sparkles of sunlight on the ocean. I will give you a necklace of pearls that beams like the moon in the evening. I will give you earrings that are more beautiful than a flock of seagulls or some such other type of romantic bird.

    You are the loveliest creature in the world, and I promise that I will freak you wild. We will do the freak in the bed. We will do the freak on the floor. We will also do the freak in the bathtub.

    At this time, you may desire to know how I will treat you before we freak. Baby, let me put it down for you:

    First, I will pick you up at your apartment dressed in a shimmering, gold satin suit. At that point, I will present a gift of a dozen roses to you. Also, I will be polite and not enter your home until you verbally invite me in.

    Then we will take a romantic horse-and-carriage ride to dine at the most expensive restaurant we can find. We will eat a meal of boiled lobsters and enjoy greens and fine wine. The waiter will do my every bidding, bringing whatever I ask, be that butter, salt, extra sauce, more napkins, or even an additional serving of boiled lobsters.

    There will be bread also.

    Next, we will attend an exquisite Broadway musical. We will enjoy the finest singing, dancing and showmanship that is available anywhere. We will be among the upper crust of society, enjoying a night of theater.

    Ennis, I can't stand it. I want to freak you right here on my desk. Come here and jump on my saddle right now.

    When the show is completed, we will return to your apartment, and you will change into a short white silk robe. I will then lead you to the balcony of your apartment, which looks out over the city. Your white robe will cascade to the ground underneath you as I run my fingers softly over the smooth skin of your long, long legs. The breeze will send a chill up and down your spine. Next, I will run my fingers softly over the remaining portions of your magnificent body, including the arms, neck and hair.

    Boy, tell me that you are soaking wet at this stage. I know that you are.

    I want to hold you tight in my arms and swear to you that I will be your man forever. I want to look deep into your eyes so you will know by the seriousness of my gaze that I will put a sting in you.

    You and me, baby. We will freak crazy.

    Damn.

    (Thanks to The Onion/Smoove Boudoir)

    ReplyDelete
  136. I know this is a tangent but I cannot make sense of this unfolding Tiger Woods story. It's one big HUH to me.

    They say that Tiger a serious womanizer, maybe they discussed it during the ride, lol.

    ReplyDelete
  137. People magazine - Oh, what a night :(

    ReplyDelete
  138. Thanks JakeySmooth :)

    ReplyDelete
  139. No way it was Jake that leaked the news early.

    I agree, but still don't know what to think about this.

    ReplyDelete
  140. "He almost fell off a park bench looking at that guy in the french park."
    Direct me to the pic please


    I think it's this one

    ReplyDelete
  141. I have always thought that Jake putting up that picuture of Heath, as Ennis Del Mar, on the prison wall was very telling.

    And starting with Friday we'll have the chance to see that prison wall.

    ReplyDelete
  142. Posted on OMG by Grapevine

    The CAA lackeys have been out in force spamming the JiG blogs to counteract the prematurely released news (but soon to be fact) that it's over.

    Reese blew a gasket, and her spokesholes were forced to come in off holidays and clear the mess up. Jake didn't even know what she was going to do - she controls the show ;)

    ReplyDelete
  143. Just Jared is pure PR so it's interesting that he immediately posted the break-up news with a confirmation from an unknown source. And then updated the news as quickly when Jake and Reese's reps denyed it. Just shows imo that People got the news from a legit source but they jumped the gun or it was done on purpose to promote Reeke before the premier.

    ReplyDelete
  144. From OMG:


    Bullshit. Jake would not allow this shit to happen the week his movie was about to open. Besides "Grapevine", Jake's rep. was the first one to deny it to Marc Mailkin at E, it wasn't Reese's rep.

    Unless you are implying that their reps fed the story to People and that's why they went with it, they can't reveal that it was their PR since People is a PRwhore magazine.

    Does mke them look stupid.

    Plant a fake story and deny it.

    JJ is full of shit, the source he had was the People blurb. He jumped on it because it came from People.

    This is so obvious a PR aplant, that's why People originaly went with it, anything for PR and pimping Reeke.

    It's the mosy attention they had in ages!

    ReplyDelete
  145. Jake didn't use Reeke to promote Brothers so far, so to me it doesn't make sense that "it was done on purpose to promote Reeke before the premier".

    ReplyDelete
  146. Plant a fake story and deny it.

    Jake's PR planted a fake story to get publicity for Brothers?
    Reese's PR planted a fake story to make Reese and Reeke part of Brothers publicity?
    Can't decide what would be more pathetic! lol

    ReplyDelete
  147. Just responding the regular poster on OMG pretending to be an insider: Grapevine. Poor Jake didn't know! Even though his rep was the first to deny.

    It's no coincidence if you click on the various blogs carying the story you see the Brothers trailer and postr.

    IMO I don't think either Jake or Reese knew what their PR was going to pull this weekend.

    ReplyDelete
  148. Even though his rep was the first to deny.

    Huh? What the order in which someone called reps has to do with anything?

    ReplyDelete
  149. IMO I don't think either Jake or Reese knew what their PR was going to pull this weekend.

    LOL, you can't be serious!

    ReplyDelete
  150. PR works for celebrities, not vice versa.

    ReplyDelete
  151. Don't LOL. We are now hearing from a "true" insider. LOL (couldn't help it!)

    ReplyDelete
  152. nothing make sense in this story.

    ReplyDelete
  153. Reeke "breaking up" would make sense.

    ReplyDelete
  154. It's the mosy attention they had in ages!

    That's true, this is great publicity for the showmance.

    ReplyDelete
  155. Hope they were testing what the reaction would be when Reeke breaks up and realised it was all good. Reeke supporters were sympathetic and the rest of us were extatic. They have never been this exciting.

    ReplyDelete
  156. Unscripted Brothers interviewNovember 30, 2009 8:57 am

    This Saturday, Nov. 21, Moviefone is excited to host Natalie Portman, Jake Gyllenhaal and Tobey Maguire for an Unscripted interview where they'll be asking each other questions submitted by you. Ask them anything you'd like, just make sure you do it before Thursday, Nov. 19 (don't forget to include your first name and where you live). Then check back here on Monday, Nov. 30 to see if your question made the cut. Good luck!

    Ask 'Brothers' Stars Natalie Portman, Jake Gyllenhaal & Tobey Maguire a Question

    ReplyDelete
  157. They have never been this exciting.

    LOL :)

    ReplyDelete
  158. This is the definitive indication (as if we need any) that Reeke is all about shameless PR bullshit.
    I'm not so surprised that they are actually doing it but I'm mesmerized seeing how clumsy are their methods.

    Even if they are a real/straight couple (which i doubt), I don't understand how can they be happy by being so speculative about their relationship. If Reese couldn't make it work in that way w/ her husband, why she thinks it will with Jake??

    Anyway, if the goal was about promoting Brothers, i think PR could have come up with something better than boring,stupid,unappealing split rumour..
    Poor Reeke, their lies are even duller than their reality :(

    ReplyDelete
  159. Well how many times are they going to plant marriage and engagement rumors? It's been awhile since there was a breakup story, LOL!!

    And the added plus: Both theiir reps say they haven't broken up and are still together, which is better then them just denying the marriage rumors, this is more defintate.

    ReplyDelete
  160. Someone have to explain me how an affair like that is supposed to promote a movie like "Brothers", specially if you deny quickly after.

    ReplyDelete
  161. "I don't understand how can they be happy by being so speculative about their relationship."

    compared to Brandgelina it's nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  162. What do you mean?

    ReplyDelete
  163. I mean,real or not, many "couples" play this game and in the rumours and speculations departement Brandgelina are the king.

    ReplyDelete
  164. Someone have to explain me how an affair like that is supposed to promote a movie like "Brothers", specially if you deny quickly after.

    I bet this is about Reese using Jake and Brothers to promote the fauxmance and get publicity for her Avon perfume and shitty 4C DVD (Christmas shopping).

    Regarding "Brothers" promotion - any publicity is good publicity, but I don't think Reeke bullshit will help Brothers BO.

    ReplyDelete
  165. I mean,real or not, many "couples" play this game

    Only publicity whores play this game.

    ReplyDelete
  166. The publicity game is so lame. Just promote the god damn movie and cut the BS!

    ReplyDelete
  167. Reeke is boring as Hell.
    After 1.000 engagement "rumors" this is pathetic, but good way to get some Reeke publicity.

    ReplyDelete
  168. "Someone have to explain me how an affair like that is supposed to promote a movie like "Brothers", specially if you deny quickly after."

    It’s a quick PR trick to put their names in the news, force all the gossip-news sites to mention them and re-post Reeke pics everywhere. At the same time it creates an excuse to make an statement that they are together. They manufactured an opportunity to reinforce the idea that they are a couple (therefore a reminder that ‘Jake is straight’) and create free and cheap publicity.

    This is the first time Jake’s reps acknowledge there is a relationship. When they denied an engagement it was different because they only said ‘it’s not true’, but with this denial that they broke up they said ‘they are together’ so we are hearing a confirmation from Jake's side without him actually having to say it himself.

    Let’s see what happens next. I believe it was planted by Reeke's PR with the consent of both Jake and the chin, for Brothers/the beard's DVDs releases and Avon, but it’s weird that People will allow themselves to be perceived as an ‘unreliable source’ only for a favor to Reeke’s PR.

    ReplyDelete
  169. They manufactured an opportunity to reinforce the idea that they are a couple (therefore a reminder that ‘Jake is straight’) and create free and cheap publicity.

    Very much so.

    ReplyDelete
  170. Excellent points 10:01. People will probably get exclusives in exchange.

    ReplyDelete
  171. Thanks for the explanation.


    "but it’s weird that People will allow themselves to be perceived as an ‘unreliable source’ only for a favor to Reeke’s PR."

    If they work for PR they can do a favor from time to time.

    ReplyDelete
  172. What’s up with Reese & Jake?

    The word from both their reps is that they have not broken up. Which means they want you to think that they are still together…

    So why the shenanigans? It’s an intriguing little gossip story.

    Sunday morning People.com breaks the exclusive that Reese Witherspoon and Jake Gyllenhaal are done. Celebrity asslicking People, usually at the beck and call of celebrity publicists, published a story without citing comment from any publicist in this case, referring to a source close to Reese who supposedly said that the relationship was over.

    This prompted OTHER outlets to seek an official response. Which came swiftly.

    There is no split.

    What the what?

    I’ve spoken with other magazine sources, usually they’re all sniffing around a story when it’s a story. No one I contacted yesterday was working on this story. It came as a surprise.

    Two viable possibilities here:

    Could simply be a bad tip. Everyone gets a bad tip now and again, it’s totally understandable. But People is usually so safe about this sh-t. People also has a direct hotline to every star flack in the business. Even on a Sunday, it seems unusual they ran the exclusive without checking first…

    Coincidence or conspiracy?

    Well…

    Jake’s new film Brothers opens this coming Friday. So far he’s not participated much in promotion. Could this be his contribution? And will we see some pap shots of the happy couple some time this week just in time for the release?

    Wait for it. It’s coming.

    But it’s a dangerous game to be playing. She threw her marriage out for public consumption in exchange for an Oscar. It can be argued in Hollywood that an Oscar is worth it. But Jake doesn’t have a lot riding on Brothers. He has much more riding on Prince of Persia which isn’t due until end of May. The timing of this move is all f-cked up. Unless it’s a preemptive strike against something else.

    This one’s a tricky bitch. Will keep you posted.


    Lainey

    ReplyDelete
  173. X17 XCLUSIVE - JAKE’S ASSISTANT RETRIEVES ITEMS FROM REESE’S HOUSE AFTER REPORTS OF BREAKUP!

    Reese's rep may be denying the breakup, but there was no denying what we saw going on at the Oscar winner's Brentwood house last night!

    Jake Gyllenhaal’s assistant visited Reese's home at 7PM on Sunday, and she stayed for about 15 minutes before stepping out with two pieces of luggage. She then headed over to Jake's house with the bags, and X17 photographers on the scene tell X17online exclusively, “She looked like she had a job to do. She was in and out very quickly, and she had two bags with her in the car when she left.”

    So does this confirm the breakup? And is this how celebs end their relationships these days?

    x17online

    ReplyDelete
  174. I don't know if x17online story is real or not, but...having a fucking asssistant to remove items after a split???!!! That is the lamest thing to do! Jake, BE A MAN for once in your life! You must show in the breakup the dignity you didn't have during the entire relationship

    shit, boys of this days....

    ReplyDelete
  175. X17online "story" is the same bullshit as that old "Reeke going to church on Sunday" fiction.

    ReplyDelete
  176. Doesn't she live in a gated community? How could they see? Also apparently they followed her from Brentwood to the HH where he supposedly lives.

    BTW, I don't believe they lived together so what was she supposedly removing from her house? Besides he has been living away from L.A. for months filming and following her around. According to tweets she was in Nashville on Sunday, sop the PA got permission to rummage through her things.

    PR for Brothers, for sloppy and tavky but what else do you expect?

    ReplyDelete
  177. Doesn't she live in a gated community? How could they see?

    They didn't see anything, lol.

    ReplyDelete
  178. This one’s a tricky bitch. Will keep you posted. Lainey

    Lainey,

    if you report that Reeke is finished I'll take back all bad things I said about you! lol

    ReplyDelete
  179. "but it’s weird that People will allow themselves to be perceived as an ‘unreliable source’ only for a favor to Reeke’s PR."
    Not at all. When the break up is confirmed People will be seen as having been right all along

    ReplyDelete
  180. Good reviews on Brothers
    About the performances :

    "If it all sounds forcibly dramatic, it's not. Benioff's script is brilliantly methodical, and it's the surprisingly strong performances from the cast that give the film a truly resonant tone. Tobey Maguire has the flashiest performance, and no doubt its one that will be recognized come awards time as his lean frame, shaved head and Travis Bickle-channelling performance utterly smashes his image as the squeaky voiced Peter Parker. However, Jake Gyllenhaal arguably has the toughest role of the bunch having to believably shift from a good-for-nothing ex-con to a reliable family man. But not only does Gyllenhaal do it, but he knocks it out of the park. In the early stasges of the film, his charming asshole routine is largely lived through his dancing eyes and a perma-smirk etched onto his stubbled face. But when Sam is declared dead, the eyes and smirk are still there but become softer and his attitude, though still somewhat immature, is slowly shaded by the weight of responsibility. It's a great performace."

    "http://theplaylist.blogspot.com/2009/11/review-brothers-harrowing-post-war.html"

    ReplyDelete
  181. "This one’s a tricky bitch. Will keep you posted.
    Lainey"



    There is nothing "tricky" about this shit, just a very clumsy movie/Avon/heterosexuality promotion.

    ReplyDelete
  182. btw,Wasn't people the one that announced the Heath/Michelle split before they made it official?

    ReplyDelete
  183. Good reviews on Brothers

    That is a great review, I guess he loves depressing movies :)

    ReplyDelete
  184. 11:22: The problem with that is they lied to all the other media outlets like E, EW, ET, Us, Access HW, Extra all to get intop the good graces of People??? People is nothing but a shill for PR, no ned to kiss their asses to make them look good.

    The "source" was Jake and Reese's PR. The reason why they didn''t give a reason was because they knew (People) that there would be a denial within a few hours.

    So People looks dumb for a day or so but down the line they hoope to get exclusives on stories not only on Jake and Reese (Breakup, engagement) but all their other clients.
    They did them a favor, look at all the ruckus the BS story generated, thst hasn't happened since I don't remember.

    LOL @ X17, they never give up. They were the ones that actually started the livinng together rumors, the engagement rumor and even the pregnancy rumors.

    ReplyDelete
  185. 11:31: Heath amd Michele split rumors were flying around before their people officially announced it with People. In this case there were no Jake and Reese split up rumors floating around.

    ReplyDelete
  186. Jake and Reese don't date, there will be no split up rumors.

    ReplyDelete
  187. People got the exclusive of Heath/Michelle breakup when those two separated months before. That split was public when both H & M DECIDED to make it public. People magazine's inside sources, My Ass.

    That's why i think, Reeke MIGHT be preaparing the field for an eventual split...or like other poster above thinks: they are actually going to get married and People will get the exclusive news by making free publicity for them during Brothers/Avon promo.

    time will tell ;)

    ReplyDelete
  188. Jake avoids talking about the beard, I'm sure he would never marry the bitch.

    ReplyDelete
  189. Jake’s new film Brothers opens this coming Friday. So far he’s not participated much in promotion. Could this be his contribution?

    I (still) hope not.

    ReplyDelete
  190. keep hoping,12:48 :´(

    ReplyDelete